Steroid lifting method during endoscopic submucosal dissection: A novel strategy for stricture prevention.

A 73-year-old male patient was referred to us with a long Barrett's esophagus (BE). He had a history of pulmonary embolism under anticoagulant therapy. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed a C8M9 BE with no macroscopic lesions. Random biopsies from the BE revealed multifocal high-grade dysplasia. The case was discussed in a multidisciplinary team conference and the decision for full resection of BE with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was made. Considering the large ESD resection and the high risk of stricture, we developed a novel preventive technique: the "steroid lifting method" for submucosal injection during ESD. Complete circumferential ESD with en bloc resection was performed using the "steroid lifting method", without adverse events. Oral liquids were initiated on day 1 and the patient was discharged on day 4. Oral prednisolone (30 mg per day) was started and tapered for a total of 6 weeks. The pathological examination confirmed multifocal high-grade dysplasia, with radical and curative resection. The patient had neither stricture, dysphagia nor recurrence of Barrett's mucosa at the 2, 6, 12, and 24-month follow-up. International guidelines recommend oral prednisolone and triamcinolone injection to prevent stricture formation in large ESD of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, there is no solid data on BE ESD. The risk factors for stricture formation and the optimal preventive management after large BE ESD is not known. The "steroid lifting method" might be an option in this context. Large prospective studies addressing stricture formation and preventive measures on BE ESD are necessary.

The influence of color vision deficiency on vessel visibility during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and the potential advantage of red dichromatic imaging to achieve color vision barrier-free.

Objectives: Although color information is important in gastrointestinal endoscopy, there are limited studies on how endoscopic images are viewed by people with color vision deficiency. We aimed to investigate the differences in the visibility of blood vessels during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) among people with different color vision characteristics and to examine the effect of red dichromatic imaging (RDI) on blood vessel visibility. Methods: Seventy-seven pairs of endoscopic images of white light imaging (WLI) and RDI of the same site were obtained during colorectal ESD. The original images were set as type C (WLI-C and RDI-C), a common color vision. These images were computationally converted to simulate images perceived by people with color vision deficiency protanope (Type P) or deutanope (Type D) and denoted as WLI-P and RDI-P or WLI-D and RDI-D. Blood vessels and background submucosa that needed to be identified during ESD were selected in each image, and the color differences between these two objects were measured using the color difference (ΔE 00) to assess the visibility of blood vessels. Results: ΔE 00 between a blood vessel and the submucosa was greater under RDI (RDI-C/P/D: 24.05 ± 0.64/22.85 ± 0.66/22.61 ± 0.64) than under WLI (WLI-C/P/D: 22.26 ± 0.60/5.19 ± 0.30/8.62 ± 0.42), regardless of color vision characteristics. This improvement was more pronounced in Type P and Type D and approached Type C in RDI. Conclusions: Color vision characteristics affect the visibility of blood vessels during ESD, and RDI improves blood vessel visibility regardless of color vision characteristics.

Prophylactic effect of compression stockings for elevated D-dimer levels following endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Objectives: A relationship between endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and deep vein thrombosis has been recognized. We previously reported that a high corrected midazolam dose (total midazolam dose/initial dose of midazolam used to induce sedation) is related to elevated D-dimer levels after ESD. In this study, the effect of compression stockings (CSs) in preventing thrombosis following ESD under sedation was evaluated by measuring D-dimer levels before and after ESD. Methods: The participants were patients who underwent ESD for upper gastrointestinal tumors during the period between April 2018 and October 2022. Patients with pre-ESD D-dimer levels ≥1.6 µg/m and patients with corrected midazolam doses ≤3.0 were excluded. A retrospective investigation of the relationship between CS use and high post-ESD D-dimer levels (difference in D-dimer levels ≥1.0 µg/mL between before and after ESD) was conducted. Results: There were 27 patients in the non-CS group (NCS) and 33 patients in the CS group. The number of patients with high post-ESD D-dimer levels was 13 (48.2%) in the non-CS group and six (18.2%) in the CS group; the number in the CS group was significantly lower (p = 0.024). On logistic regression analysis, a relationship was seen between the wearing of CSs and a lower number of patients with high post-ESD D-dimer levels (odds ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.79, p = 0.019). Conclusion: Wearing CSs was related to a lower risk of high post-ESD D-dimer levels. This result suggests that thrombus formation is a cause of elevated D-dimer levels after ESD.

Extraction of terminal ileal lipomas to cecum can facilitate endoscopic resection: A case series with video.

Large ileal lipomas over 2 cm can cause symptoms, that may require a resection. Due to the narrow lumen and thin walls of the ileum, endoscopic treatments can have a high risk of adverse events and require technical expertise, thus surgical resection is currently the mainstay of treatment. To overcome the technical challenges, we developed a novel method to endoscopically resect terminal ileal lipomas. The technique involves extracting the lesion into the cecum, which creates sufficient space to maneuver, and a better field of view. The lipoma is resected with endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection. The appearance of the lipoma protruding out of the ileocecal valve resembles that of a tongue sticking out of the mouth, thus we named this the "tongue out technique". To assess the technical feasibility of this method, we retrospectively analyzed seven cases of terminal ileal lipoma that were endoscopically resected using the "tongue out technique" at NTT Medical Center Tokyo between January 2017 and October 2023. Technical success was 100% and en bloc resection was achieved in all cases. The median size was 31 (14-55) mm. Three cases were resected with endoscopic mucosal resection while endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed on the other four cases. There was one case of delayed post-endoscopic mucosal resection bleeding, which was caused by clip dislodgement. There were no perforations. No recurrence of the lipoma or associated symptoms have been observed. This new technique can allow more ileal lipomas to be treated with minimally invasive and organ-preserving endoscopic procedures.

Usefulness of virtual scale endoscope for early gastrointestinal lesions.

Objectives: For early gastrointestinal lesions, size is an important factor in the selection of treatment. Virtual scale endoscope (VSE) is a newly developed endoscope that can measure size more accurately than visual measurement. This study aimed to investigate whether VSE measurement is accurate for early gastrointestinal lesions of various sizes and morphologies. Methods: This study prospectively enrolled patients with early gastrointestinal lesions ≤20 mm in size visually. Lesion sizes were measured in the gastrointestinal tract visually, on endoscopic resection specimens with VSE, and finally on endoscopic resection specimens using a ruler. The primary endpoint was the normalized difference (ND) of VSE measurement. The secondary endpoints were the ND of visual measurement and the variation between NDs of VSE and visual measurements. ND was calculated as (100 × [measured size - true size] / true size) (%). True size was defined as size measured using a ruler. Results: This study included 60 lesions from April 2022 to December 2022, with 20 each in the esophagus, stomach, and colon. The lesion size was 14.0 ± 6.3 mm (mean ± standard deviation). Morphologies were protruded, slightly elevated, and flat or slightly depressed type in 8, 24, and 28 lesions, respectively. The primary endpoint was 0.3 ± 8.8%. In the secondary endpoints, the ND of visual measurement was -1.7 ± 29.3%, and the variability was significantly smaller in the ND of VSE measurement than in that of visual measurement (p < 0.001, F-test). Conclusions: VSE measurement is accurate for early gastrointestinal lesions of various sizes and morphologies.

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in the USA: The current state and future perspectives.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a transformative advancement in the endoscopic management of superficial gastrointestinal lesions. Initially conceived for the treatment of early gastric cancer, ESD has demonstrated proficiency in achieving en-bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal lesions. ESD has experienced widespread acceptance in Japan and East Asia; however, its adoption in the USA remains delayed. This initial hesitancy could be attributed to procedural complexity and training demands; nonetheless, recently, ESD has been gaining popularity in the USA. This is due to the advancements in endoscopic technology, tailored training programs, and cumulative evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of ESDs. This review aimed to deliberate the historical progress, current implementation, and prospective trajectory of ESDs in the USA. With ongoing clinical research, technological integration, and educational efforts, ESD is likely to become the gold standard for managing large gastrointesitinal lesions. This progress marks an imperative step toward less invasive, more precise, and patient-centric approaches regarding advanced therapeutic endoscopy in the USA.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for undifferentiated type early gastric cancer over 2 cm with R0 resection.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for over 2 cm in size undifferentiated type (UD type) early gastric cancer (EGC) confined to the mucosa is not only challenging, but also long-term outcomes are not well known. AIM: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of ESD done for UD type EGCs confined to the mucosa over 2 cm in size and compare the results with those where the lesions were less than 2 cm. METHODS: 143 patients with UD type EGC confirmed on histology after ESD at a tertiary hospital were reviewed. Cases with synchronous and metachronous lesions and a case with emergency surgery after ESD were excluded. A total of 137 cases were enrolled. 79 cases who underwent R0 resection were divided into 2 cm or less (group A) and over 2 cm (group B) in size. RESULTS: Among 79 patients who underwent R0 resection, the number in group A and B were 51 and 28, respectively. The mean follow-up period (SD) was 79.71 ± 45.42 months. There was a local recurrence in group A (1/51, 2%) and group B (1/28, 3.6%) respectively. This patient in group A underwent surgery while the patient in group B underwent repeated ESD with no further recurrences in both patients. There was no regional lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and deaths in both groups. With R0 resection strategy for ESD on lesions over 2 cm, 20.4% (28/137) of patients were able to avoid surgery compared with expanded indication. CONCLUSION: If R0 resection is achieved by ESD, UD type EGCs over 2 cm also showed good and similar clinical outcomes as compared to lesions less than 2 cm when followed for over 5 years. With R0 resection strategy, several patients can avoid surgery.

Risk of stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the cervical esophagus and efficacy of local steroid injection for stricture prevention.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is a high incidence of stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for cervical esophageal cancer. We aimed to elucidate the risk factors for stricture and evaluate the efficacy of steroid injection for stricture prevention in the cervical esophagus. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 100 patients who underwent ESD for cervical esophageal cancer to: (1) identify the factors associated with stricture among patients who did not receive steroid injection; (2) compare the incidence of stricture between patients with and without steroid injection. RESULTS: Among 48 patients who did not receive steroid injection, there were significant differences in tumor size (P = .026), resection time (P = .028), and circumferential extent of the mucosal defect (P = .005) between patients with stricture (n = 5) and without stricture (n = 43). Compared with patients without steroid injection, patients with steroid injection had a significantly lower incidence of stricture when the post-ESD mucosal defect was < 3/4 and ≥ 1/2 (40% versus 8%, P = .039). As for the patients with a post-ESD mucosal defect of ≥ 3/4 (n = 13), local steroid injection was performed for all the patients, and 6 patients (46%) developed stricture. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent ≥ 1/2 circumferential resection were at high risk of cervical esophageal stricture. Steroid injection had a stricture-prevention effect in patients with < 3/4 and ≥ 1/2 circumferential resection, but seemed to be insufficient in preventing stricture in patients with ≥ 3/4 circumferential resection.

Tunneled or Pocket Creation Method versus Conventional Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Lesions - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Tunneled endoscopic submucosal dissection (T-ESD) and pocket creation method ESD (PCM-ESD) are considered to have technical advantages over conventional ESD (C-ESD). However, data comparing these techniques for ESD of gastric lesions is limited. METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane databases were reviewed for relevant studies from their inception to October 31, 2023. Studies comparing T-ESD or PCM-ESD (T/PCM-ESD) to C-ESD for gastric lesions were included. The primary outcomes were dissection speed and en bloc resection. Secondary outcomes were R0 resection, recurrence, perforation, and post-ESD bleeding. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Eight observational studies (359 patients - T/PCM-ESD, 670 patients - C-ESD) were included. T/PCM-ESD was associated with a significantly faster dissection speed (Mean Difference: 4.42 mm2/min, 95% CI: 2.05, 6.79, I2 = 79%). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of en bloc resection (risk ratio (RR): 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.03, I2 = 0%), R0 resection (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.99-1.07, I2 = 0%) and recurrence (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.14-3.84, I2 = 0%). While T/PCM-ESD was associated with a significantly lower risk of perforation (RR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.06-0.80, I2 = 0%), post-ESD bleeding rates were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: T/PCM-ESD facilitates faster and safer gastric ESD than conventional ESD with comparable en bloc resection, R0 resection, and recurrence rates. A future randomized controlled control trial is required.

Optimal management options for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (E-GIST).

OBJECTIVE: To explore the different treatment modalities for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (E-GIST) and their respective applicability and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective study in which consecutive patients diagnosed with E-GIST at our hospital from January 2017 to August 2023 were included. The clinical characteristics of all the patients as well as long-term quality of life were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 23 (12 males, 11 females) E-GIST patients with a mean age of 56.7 ± 12.0 years were included in this study. Common symptoms, including upper abdominal pain, acid reflux, and heartburn, accounted for over 60 % of cases. Fifteen patients underwent endoscopic resection, five patients underwent surgical resection, two patients underwent surgical resection after receiving preoperative imatinib therapy, and one patient received conservative management. CONCLUSION: Different treatment strategies may be applied to the patients with E-GIST depending on the their clinical features. Our study provides insights into precise treatment for different patients. However, due to the rarity of the disease, it is challenging to collect a large sample size from a single center, necessitating more multicenter prospective large-scale studies.

Comparing underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for large laterally spreading tumor: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is challenging despite its usefulness. Underwater ESD (UESD) provides better traction and a clearer view of the submucosal layer than conventional ESD (CESD). This study compared the efficiency of UESD and CESD for large (20-50 mm) laterally spreading tumor (LST). METHODS: Preplanned sample size was calculated from our previous experience. As a results, 28 patients were required to UESD group or CESD group, respectively. The primary outcome was total procedure time while the secondary outcome was dissection speed. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were enrolled and a total of 28 patients were assigned to each group. The mean size of LST was 31.6 mm and 31.3 mm in the UESD and CESD group, respectively. Fibrosis was observed in 67.9% and 60.7% patients in the UESD and CESD group. Total procedure time (mean [SD]) for the UESD group was significantly shorter than that for the CESD group, respectively (49.5 minutes [20.3] vs 75.7 minutes [36.1]; mean difference, -26.2 minutes; 95% CI, -42.0 to -10.5). Dissection speed of the UESD group was significantly faster than that of the CESD group (21.9 mm2/min [6.9] vs 15.2 mm2/min [7.3]; mean difference, 6.7 mm2/minutes; 95% CI, 2.8-10.4). There was no difference between groups in the R0 resection rate or en bloc resection rate. No perforations were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: UESD was superior to CESD in total procedure time and dissection speed. UESD can be recommended as the preferred method for the resection of large LST.

Efficacy of Two Kinds of Scissor-Type Knives for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Scissor-type knives are spreading as safe devises in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We evaluated the efficacy of two kinds of scissor-type knives (Clutch Cutter: CC, Fujifilm Co. and SB Knife Jr2: SB, SB-KAWASUMI Laboratories. Inc.) in colorectal ESD. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study analyzed 178 ESD cases treated with CC from January 2020 to August 2021 and 91 cases with SB from September 2021 to December 2023. The two groups were compared through propensity score matching. Therapeutic results, such as ESD procedure time, en bloc resection rate, perioperative bleeding frequency, and complications, were analyzed in each group. Risk factors for long ESD procedure time (≥ 90 min) were also examined. RESULTS: After matching, 87 cases in each group were analyzed. There was no significant difference in the ESD procedure time (min, median [interquartile range]) between the CC and SB groups (54.0 [36.0-72.0] vs. 53.0 [39.0-72.0], p = 0.99). Additionally, there were no differences in the en bloc resection (100% vs. 100%, p = 1.00), perioperative perforation (1.1% vs. 1.1%, p = 1.00), or delayed bleeding (1.1% vs. 0.0%, p = 1.00). There was a significant difference in perioperative bleeding frequency (mean ± standard deviation: 1.8 ± 2.6 vs. 3.0 ± 3.5, p < 0.01). The significant risk factors (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]) for long ESD procedure time in patients treated with CC or SB were antiplatelet (7.51 [1.82-31.00]), large lesion size (1.08 [1.05-1.12]), severe fibrosis (24.30 [7.60-77.90]), and perioperative bleeding frequency (1.34 [1.14-1.56]). CONCLUSIONS: CC and SB in colorectal ESD enabled high en bloc resection and low complication rates. CC showed significantly less perioperative bleeding than SB.

Multicenter retrospective analysis of complications and risk factors in endoscopic resection for esophageal cancer across Japan.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection (ER) is a minimally invasive treatment for esophageal cancer that sometimes causes complications. To understand the real-world incidence and risk factors for these complications, a nationwide survey was conducted across Japan. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included patients who underwent ER for esophageal cancer from April 2017 to March 2018 (2017 complication analysis) and April 2021 to March 2022 (2021 complication analysis). The study assessed the complication rates and conducted risk factor analyses for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using data for these patients, with exclusions based on specific criteria to ensure data accuracy. RESULTS: In the 2021 complication analysis, there were two mortalities highly likely attributable (0.03%) to ER and one mortality possibly attributable (0.01%) to ER. Intraoperative perforation, delayed bleeding, and pneumonia occurred in 137 cases (1.8%), 44 cases (0.6%), and 130 cases (1.7%), respectively. In the multivariate analysis for complications after ESD, low ER volume of the facility was an independent risk factor for perforation, while lesion location in the cervical or upper thoracic esophagus was an independent factor for reduced risk of perforation. Age ≥ 80 years was a risk factor for pneumonia, while use of traction techniques was a factor for reduced risk of pneumonia. Lesions located in the middle thoracic esophagus had a lower risk of stricture, and the risk of stricture increased as the circumferential extent of the lesion increased. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale study provided detailed insights into the complications associated with esophageal ER and identified significant risk factors.

Gastric carcinoma of the fundic gland type developed 32 years after Helicobacter pylori eradication for duodenal ulcer: a case report.

Introduction: Gastric cancer has been reported to occur with mild to moderate mucosal atrophy, particularly after the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (HP) more than 10 years previously. However, no conclusion has been reached on how many years of esophagogastroduodenoscopy should be performed after HP eradication. Presentation of case: This was a case of gastric carcinoma of the fundic gland type (GCFGT) 32 years after the eradication of HP, which is the longest posteradication period reported. A 62-year-old male patient was diagnosed with GCFGT after HP eradication and regular esophagogastroduodenoscopy, which revealed a white raised lesion on the anterior wall of the upper part of the body. Endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed for GCFGT, and the vertical and horizontal margins were negative. Clinical discussion: In this case, HP was eradicated in 1990, and GCFGT developed 32 years later. To the best of our knowledge, this is the longest case in which gastric cancer appeared after HP eradication. HP eradication therapy for a duodenal ulcer was first reported in 1990, supporting that this is the longest case. Conclusions: This is the first case of gastric cancer more than 20 years after the eradication of HP. The endoscopic findings of this case are typical of GCFGT and may be useful when encountering such cases in the future. Therefore, the risk of gastric cancer should be considered for an extended period even after the eradication of HP, and regular esophagogastroduodenoscopy is recommended even after the eradication of HP.

Treatment outcomes of endoscopic resection for nonampullary duodenal neuroendocrine tumors.

Background: The incidence rate of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors has been increasing in recent years. Endoscopic resection [ER; endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)] is recommended for nonampullary duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NAD-NETs) ≤10 mm in diameter that are confined to the submucosal layer and without lymph node or distant metastasis. However, the efficacy and safety of and indications for EMR/ESD remain unclear. Methods: Between November 2011 and April 2021, 12 NAD-NETs in 12 patients who underwent either EMR or ESD were analyzed retrospectively. The rates of en bloc resection, complete resection, pathologic complete resection, margin involvement, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, complications and prognosis were determined during follow-up (median observation period 53.0 months). Results: EMR was performed for two tumors, and ESD was performed for ten tumors. En bloc resection was performed for both tumors (100%) in the EMR group, and complete resection was achieved in one case (50%). Pathological complete resection was achieved in one case (50%), while in the ESD group, these three rates were 90% (9/10), 80% (8/10), and 80% (8/10), respectively. Intraoperative perforation occurred in one patient (10%) during ESD treatment, with no intraoperative or delayed bleeding in either group. Recurrence and distant metastasis were not observed during the mean follow-up period of 53.0 months (range, 18-131 months). Conclusions: For NAD-NETs that measure ≤10 mm in size, are confined to the submucosal layer and have neither suspicious lymph nodes nor distant metastasis, ER (EMR and ESD) may be a safe, effective, and feasible endoscopic technique for removing them.

Meta-analysis of clinical efficacy and safety of transanal endoscopic microsurgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of rectal tumors.

Aim: The aim of the article was to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the treatment of rectal tumors. Material and methods: Control studies were conducted on cases included in the electronic databases Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI. Patients with colorectal tumors were included in the TEM and ESD groups for treatment, with the main indicators being R0 resection rate, postoperative perforation and bleeding incidence, and tumor recurrence rate. The meta-analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: A total of 10 studies were included, with 736 patients. The analysis showed that for the recurrence rate in the TEM group compared to ESD, OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.56-2.72, p = 0.60; for the R0 resection rate between the TEM group and ESD group, OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.82-2.22, p = 0.24; for the incidence of perforation in the TEM and ESD groups, OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.25-1.40, p = 0.23. The inter-group comparison of these three items was statistically significant. Compared with the ESD group, the hospitalization time and the incidence of bleeding of the TEM group were both lower, with SD = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.26-0.69, p < 0.001 and OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.13-0.92, p = 0.03. The differences were statistically significant. Conclusions: Both TEM and ESD endoscopic treatment techniques can achieve a higher R0 resection rate and lower risk of tumor recurrence in the treatment of colorectal tumors. However, TEM may have higher surgical safety than ESD technology, and can shorten postoperative hospitalization time and lower postoperative bleeding rate.

Hybrid endoscopic approaches for complex colorectal polyps with a non-lifting sign: the Greek experience.

Background: Hybrid approaches combining endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) with conventional techniques (endoscopic mucosal resection [EMR], endoscopic submucosal dissection [ESD]) have enabled the resection of difficult fibrotic colorectal adenomas exhibiting a "non-lifting" sign, and polyps in difficult positions. We present our cohort treated with either EMR+EFTR or ESD+EFTR as salvage hybrid endoscopic approaches for complex colorectal polyps not amenable to conventional techniques. Methods: Retrospective analysis included technical success, histological confirmation of margin-free resection, assessment of adverse events and follow up with histological assessment. All patients underwent follow-up endoscopy at least 6 and 12 months post-resection. Results: Fourteen patients underwent hybrid EFTR procedures (11 EMR+EFTR and 3 ESD+EFTR). Technical success was achieved in all cases where the full-thickness resection device (FTRD) was advanced to the site of the resection (100%). In 2 cases, the FTRD system could not be passed through the sigmoid colon because of severe chronic diverticulitis, subsequent fibrosis and stiffness. The mean lesion size in the EMR+EFTR group (41.7 mm; range 20-50 mm) was larger than the ESD+EFTR group (31.7 mm; range 30-35 mm). Six patients (42.9%) were histologically diagnosed with T1 carcinoma. The mean duration of hospitalization was 1.4 days. Follow-up endoscopy was available in all patients and no recurrence was observed with histological confirmation during a mean follow-up period of 15.4 months. Conclusion: Hybrid procedures appear to be safe and effective treatments for complex colorectal lesions not amenable to EMR, ESD or EFTR alone, because of the lesion size, positive non-lifting sign, and difficult positions.

A comparative analysis of different reduced-port laparoscopic surgical procedures after non-curative endoscopic resection for early colorectal cancer.

Introduction: Surgery serves as a salvage procedure for non-curative resection of early-stage colorectal cancer under endoscopy. A standard method for performing additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early colorectal cancer has yet to be established. Aim: To enhance the understanding of different surgical outcomes by discussing additional treatment strategies following non-complete curative endoscopic resection of early colorectal cancer. Material and methods: This retrospective study included 88 patients who were divided into three groups based on the surgical approach: conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS), single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery (SILS+1), and three-port laparoscopic surgery combined with natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (three-port NOSES). The study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes, safety, and postoperative recovery among these groups. Results: The SILS+1 and three-port NOSES groups demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy to the CLS group in terms of blood loss, complications, number of lymph node dissections, and length of bowel resection. However, the SILS+1 and three-port NOSES groups had advantages in terms of incision length (7.11 ±0.38, 4.24 ±0.33, 3.16 ±0.22, p < 0.001), postoperative pain (4.000 [3.0,5.0], 3.500 [3.0,4.0], 3.000 [3.0,4.0]; p = 0.003), cosmetic result (4.000 [3.8,5.0], 7.000 [7.0,8.0], 7.000 [7.0,8.0]; p < 0.001), and hospital stay (8.000 [7.0,9.0], 7.000 [6.3,8.0.], 7.000 [6.3,8.0]; p = 0.035). Conclusions: Different strategies of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery have been demonstrated to be effective and safe in additional surgery after non-curative ESD. These techniques have shown reduced pain and increased satisfaction among patients. Reduced-port laparoscopic surgery is expected to become the preferred treatment option for these patients.

Novel perfusion system using continuous liquid-suction catheter attachment in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection with water pressure method (with video).

Water pressure method (WPM) is useful for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), characterized not only by underwater conditions but also by active water pressure via the waterjet function. However, the extension of the colorectum by injecting excess water and contaminating the operative field by stool and bleeding have been issues. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a novel perfusion system using a continuous liquid-suction catheter attachment (CLCA) in colorectal ESD with WPM. We retrospectively reviewed cases in which the perfusion system was used in colorectal ESD with WPM between August 2022 and September 2023. We evaluated clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, volume of injection by the waterjet function, volume of suction by the endoscope and CLCA, and concentration of floating matter in the operative field over time. Thirty-one cases were enrolled. The median lesion size was 30 (range, 15-100) mm. In all cases, en bloc resection was achieved without perforation. The median injection volume was 2312 (range, 1234-13,866) g. The median suction volumes by the endoscope and CLCA were 918 (range, 141-3162) and 1147 (range, 254-11,222) g, respectively. The median concentration of floating matter in the operative field (measured in 15 cases) was 15.3 (range, 7.3-112) mg/mL when the endoscope arrived at the lesion and 8.0 (range, 3.2-16) mg/mL after endoscopically washing at the beginning of the ESD. It ranged from 7.6 to 13.4 mg/dL every 20 min during ESD. This perfusion system could prevent the extension of the lumen and maintain a good field of view in colorectal ESD with WPM.

The Outcomes of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Honam Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (HASID) Multicenter Study.

Colorectal neoplasms are prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, the safety and efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are not well understood. This retrospective analysis included ESD procedures performed in 1266 patients with CKD across five tertiary medical institutions from January 2015 to December 2020. Patients were categorized based on their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), which ranged from CKD1 to CKD5 (including those on dialysis). We found that en bloc resection rates remained high across all CKD stages, affirming the procedural efficacy of ESD. Notably, the prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities, such as ischemic heart disease and diabetes mellitus, significantly increased with an advancing CKD stage, with a corresponding increase in the Charlson Comorbidity Index, highlighting the complexity of managing these patients. Despite these challenges, the complete resection rate was lower in the CKD5 group (50%) than in the CKD1 group (83.4%); however, procedural complications, such as perforation and bleeding, did not significantly differ among the groups. The predictive models for complete resection and major complications showed no significant changes with a decreasing eGFR. These findings underscore that ESD is a feasible and safe treatment for colorectal neoplasms in patients with CKD, successfully balancing the inherent procedural risks with clinical benefits.