Evolving Medical Student Experiences in the Surgery Clerkship: A New Generation.

BACKGROUND: The surgery clerkship has a powerful impact on medical students' attitudes toward surgery. The primary aim of this study was to identify factors that influence current medical student experiences during the surgery clerkship and discern if they have shifted following the COVID pandemic and with a new generation of "Zillennial" students. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a qualitative content analysis of medical student surgery clerkship evaluations from 2018 to 2022 at three clinical training sites of our medical school (n = 596). The codes and themes that emerged from the data were then compared between the pre-COVID cohort (pre-March 2020) and post-COVID (post June 2020) cohorts. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed four themes: clerkship factors, educator qualities, surgical culture, and student expectations. Clerkship factors included the overall clerkship organization, preparatory sessions, and having schedule flexibility. The clinical educators had a significant impact on medical student experience by setting expectations and providing actionable feedback. Surgical culture included the team dynamic and professionalism or diversity issues. Students were expected to have clear guidance for their roles, opportunities to shine, and sought meaningful learning. While the themes were consistent between both cohorts, the frequency of codes varied, with more students commenting on flexibility, neglect, and long work hours in the post-COVID cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous previously unreported factors impact surgical clerkship experiences, revealing a generational shift in medical student attitudes. These results suggest that educators and their institutions must be proactive in tracking student evaluations to adapt their clerkship curriculum for an optimal educational experience and evolving student expectations.

The Surgical Clerkship in the COVID Era: A Natural Language Processing and Thematic Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Responses to COVID-19 within medical education prompted significant changes to the surgical clerkship. We analyzed the changes in medical student end of course feedback before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: Postclerkship surveys from 2017 to 2022 were analyzed including both Likert scale data and free text, excluding the COVID outbreak year 2019-2020. Likert scale questions were compared between pre-COVID (2017-2019) and COVID-era cohorts (2020-2022) with the Mann-Whitney U-test. Free-text comments were analyzed using both thematic analysis and natural language processing including sentiment, word and phrase frequency, and topic modeling. RESULTS: Of the 483 medical students surveyed from 2017 to 2022, 297 responded (61% response rate) to the included end of clerkship surveys. Most medical students rated the clerkship above average or excellent with no significant difference between the pre-COVID and COVID-era cohorts (70.4% Versus 64.8%, P = 0.35). Perception of grading expectations did significantly differ, 51% of pre-COVID students reported clerkship grading standards were almost always clear compared to 27.5% of COVID-era students (P = 0.01). Pre-COVID cohorts more frequently mentioned learning and feedback while COVID-era cohorts more frequently mentioned case, attending, and expectation. Natural language processing topic modeling and formal thematic analysis identified similar themes: team, time, autonomy, and expectations. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 presented many challenges to undergraduate medical education. Despite many changes, there was no significant difference in clerkship satisfaction ratings. Unexpectedly, the greater freedom and autonomy of asynchronous lectures and choice of cases became a highlight of the new curriculum. Future research should investigate if there are similar associations nationally with a multi-institutional study.

Medical student perceptions of assessments of clinical reasoning in a general surgery clerkship.

BACKGROUND: Components factoring into general surgery clerkship grades vary by institution, and while evaluators attempt to remain unbiased when evaluating medical student performance, subjectivity and implicit bias remain an issue. Our institution recently implemented a case-based structured oral examination to provide the general surgery clerkship director objective insight into students' clinical reasoning skills. We hypothesized that medical students believe this exam, along with graded clinical documentation and the Observed Standardized Clinical Encounter (OSCE), are fair assessments and increase students' awareness of their clinical reasoning skills. METHODS: A survey was sent to third-year medical students in the classes of 2023 and 2024 at our institution who had completed their general surgery clerkship. Students rated five grading assessments (i.e., preceptor evaluations, the oral examination, clinical documentation, the OSCE, and the shelf exam) on fairness and the ability of the assessment to give them insight into their clinical reasoning on a five-point Likert scale 1-5 (with 1 = Strongly Agree, 5 = Strongly Disagree). RESULTS: One hundred and ten of 162 (67.9%) students responded to the survey. The shelf examination was the most highly regarded assessment tool followed by the oral examination. Seventy-three percent agreed or strongly agreed that the oral exam was a fair assessment, and 80% agreed or strongly agreed that it gave them insight into their clinical reasoning skills. Alternatively, only 41.8% of students agreed or strongly agreed that preceptor evaluations were fair assessments and 42.7% agreed or strongly agreed that it gave them insight into their clinical reasoning. CONCLUSIONS: Third-year medical students on a general surgery clerkship favor the shelf examination and a case-based oral examination over other assessment tools regarding fairness and perception of their clinical reasoning. This type of examination can provide general surgery clerkship directors with additional objective data to assess medical students more fairly and improve students' clinical reasoning.

An assessment of surgery core rotation quality at osteopathic medical schools.

CONTEXT: Osteopathic medical schools have traditionally placed a heavy emphasis on the field of primary care. While graduating osteopathic students continue to pursue family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics at higher rates than their allopathic counterparts, it is unknown whether students feel that surgical rotations are held to similar standards. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess osteopathic medical student opinions of the quality of their surgical clerkships and to determine if good or poor experiences influenced their decision to continue pursuing surgery. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a voluntary and anonymous Qualtrics survey was sent to all nationally registered members of the American College of Osteopathic Surgeons, Medical Student Section (ACOS-MSS) in their final 2 years of medical school. Analyses were conducted utilizing R statistical software. RESULTS: A total of 345 responses were recorded from the Qualtrics survey sent to 2182 ACOS students from the national registry (response rate of 15.8 %). Students who found a mentor during their surgical rotations were more likely to consider a surgical career after they completed their rotations (odds ratio [OR]=1.43, p=0.003). Students at academic sites had more opportunities for research than those at community hospitals (p=0.019). Most students responded that they were still considering surgery as a career after rotation completion; a significant portion (OR=0.36, p<0.001) responded that they were no longer interested. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students are most likely to review a surgical rotation favorably if they can connect with a mentor while on rotation. Osteopathic medical schools may benefit from instituting mentorship programs for students interested in surgery, as well as ensuring that their students have ample opportunity for research.

Preclinical Immersion Experiences Improve Medical Student Perceptions of Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Medical students historically receive little to no preclinical exposure to surgery and surgical subspecialties. As a result, by the time they reach their clinical clerkship time, students often have already found interest in other specialties. The goal of this study is to utilize the knowledge to action (KTA) implementation framework to design and refine a clinical immersion experience during the second year of medical school. METHODS: A total of 94 second-year Harvard Medical School students underwent the surgical immersion experience between 2019 and 2022 (the program was postponed in 2020 due to COVID). The development and refinement of the curriculum were nicely modeled by the KTA implementation framework. We identified a gap in medical student preclinical education, adapted a curriculum for preclinical medical students at Massachusetts General Hospital , selected the curriculum components to provide a high-level overview of surgery, monitored the student experience, and evaluated outcomes using the student surveys. Based on the survey results, inductive thematic analysis was utilized to identify prominent positive and negative themes. The feedback was then used to tailor subsequent iterations of the immersion experience. RESULTS: Eighty-eight medical students completed the survey (RR = 93.6%), and 85% rated the immersion experience as "excellent", 11% "very good", 4% "good", and 0% "fair" or "poor". There was no significant difference in ratings between sessions. Several key themes were identified, including changed perceptions, diversity of surgical fields, teamwork, surgery clerkship preparedness, and the need for more preclinical exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Preclinical medical students gave overwhelmingly positive reviews of the surgical immersion experience. A half-day intervention is sufficient to begin changing students' views toward surgery, disproving stereotypes, and even inspiring some to consider a surgical field themselves. In addition, the KTA implementation framework is a useful model for the development and refinement of medical education curricula.

Revisiting Medical Student Expectations on the Surgery Clerkship.

OBJECTIVE: Medical students frequently report ambiguity of expectations in their feedback of the surgery clerkship. Herein, we aimed to gauge general surgery resident and attending expectations of students on their clerkship. DESIGN: Residents and attending surgeons were surveyed on medical student expectations for rounding and floor duties, the operating room, clinic, and professionalism. RESULTS: There were slight differences in expectations between residents and attendings, which were then utilized to facilitate a discussion to create consensus expectations for students. Early outcomes demonstrate improved understanding of expectations by medical students. CONCLUSION: Identifying differences in resident and attending expectations of medical students on their surgery clerkship can help improve the alignment of such expectations. We hope that longterm, this intervention can facilitate a better learning environment for medical students on their surgery clerkship.

Examination Scores but not Clinical Performance Correlate With Duration of Preclinical Didactic Time: A Synchronous Comparison of Second- Versus Third-Year Medical Students on the Surgery Clerkship.

OBJECTIVE: Numerous institutions have reduced preclinical didactic time to facilitate earlier clinical exposure during the second year of medical education. However, the effects that shortened preclinical education may have on performance in the surgery clerkship are unclear. This study aims to compare the clinical and examination performance of second- (MS2) and third-year (MS3) students synchronously completing an identical surgery clerkship. DESIGN: All students completing the surgery clerkship (identical didactics, examinations, clinical rotations, etc.) were included. MS3s received 24 months of preclinical education, whereas MS2s received 14 months. Performance outcomes included weekly quizzes based on lectures, NBME Surgery Shelf Exam, numeric clinical evaluations, objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) scores, and overall clerkship grades. SETTING: University of Miami Miller School of Medicine. PARTICIPANTS: All second- (MS2) and third-year (MS3) medical students completing the Surgery Clerkship over 1 year (n = 395). RESULTS: There were 199 MS3 (50%) and 196 MS2 (50%) students. MS3s demonstrated higher median shelf exams (77% vs 72% MS2s), weekly quiz score averages (87% vs 80% MS2s), clinical evaluations (96% vs 95% MS2s), and overall clerkship grades (89% vs 87% MS2s), all p < 0.020. There was no difference in median OSCE performance (both 92%; p = 0.499). A greater proportion of MS3 students performed in the highest 50% of weekly quiz scores (57% vs 43% MS2), NBME shelf exams (59% vs 39% MS2), and overall clerkship grades (45% vs 37% MS2), all p < 0.010. No significant difference in the proportion of students placing in the top 50% of clinical parameters including the OSCE (48% MS3 vs 46% MS2; p = 0.106) and clinical evaluations (45% MS3 vs 38%; p = 0.185) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Although the duration of preclerkship education may correspond to examination scores, MS2s and MS3s perform similarly on clinical metrics. Future strategies to enhance available preclinical didactic time and preparation for examinations are needed.

Real-Time Student Feedback on the Surgical Learning Environment: Use of a Mobile Application.

OBJECTIVE: Improvements to the medical student surgical learning environment are limited by lack of granular data and recall bias on end-of-clerkship evaluations. The purpose of this study was to identify specific areas for intervention using a novel real-time mobile application. DESIGN: An application was designed to obtain real-time feedback from medical students regarding the learning environment on their surgical clerkship. Thematic analysis of student experiences was performed at the conclusion of 4 consecutive 12-week rotation blocks. SETTING: Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. RESULTS: Fifty-four medical students at a single institution were asked to participate during their primary clerkship experience. Students submitted 365 responses over 48 weeks. Multiple themes emerged which were dichotomized into positive and negative emotions centered on specific student priorities. Approximately half of responses were associated with positive emotions (52.9%) and half with negative emotions (47.1%). Student priorities included the desire to feel included in the surgical team (resulting in feeling engaged/ignored), to have a positive relationship with members of the team (perceiving kind/rude interactions), to witness compassionate patient care (observing empathy/disrespect for patients), to have a well-planned surgical rotation (experiencing organization/disorganization within teams), and to feel that student well-being is prioritized (reporting opportunities/disregard for student wellness). CONCLUSION: A novel, user-friendly mobile application identified several areas to improve the experience and engagement of students on their surgery clerkship. Allowing clerkship directors and other educational leaders to collect longitudinal data in real time may allow for more targeted, timely improvements to the medical student surgical learning environment.

Medical student preparation for the operating room.

BACKGROUND: This study examines student perceptions of preparedness for the operating room (OR), resources used, and time spent in preparation. METHODS: Third-year medical and second-year physician assistant students across two campuses at a single academic institution were surveyed to assess perceptions of preparedness, time spent in preparation, resources used, and perceived benefits of preparation. RESULTS: 95 responses (response rate 49%) were received. Students reported being most prepared to discuss operative indications and contraindications (73%), anatomy (86%), and complications (70%), but few felt prepared to discuss operative steps (31%). Students spent a mean of 28 min preparing per case, citing UpToDate and online videos as the most used resources (74%; 73%). On secondary analysis, only the use of an anatomic atlas was weakly correlated with improved preparedness to discuss relevant anatomy (p = 0.005); time spent, number of resources or other specific resources were not associated with increased preparedness. CONCLUSION: Students felt prepared for the OR, though there is room for improvement and a need for student-oriented preparatory materials. Understanding the deficits in preparation, preference for technology-based resources, and time constraints of current students can be used to inform optimisation for medical student education and resources to prepare for operating room cases.

Effects of Recorded versus Live Teleconference Didactic Lectures on Medical Student Performance in the Surgery Clerkship.

OBJECTIVE: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous institutions converted medical education didactics to electronic formats including both live teleconference didactics and recorded faculty lectures. This study aims to compare the effect of recorded versus live teleconference didactic lectures on medical student examination scores during the surgery clerkship. DESIGN: Medical students completing the Surgery Clerkship received a weekly series of didactic lectures taught by faculty via a teleconference (2020-2021 academic year) or recorded format (2021-2022 academic year). Performance outcomes included weekly quizzes, National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Surgery Shelf Exam, and clerkship Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores. SETTING: University of Miami Miller School of Medicine. PARTICIPANTS: All second- (MS2) and third-year (MS3) medical students completing the Surgery Clerkship over two academic years (n = 312). RESULTS: Students who received live teleconference lectures (n = 156) demonstrated higher average scores on weekly quizzes (89%) and the NBME shelf exam (76%) compared to those receiving recorded lectures (n = 156; 71% quiz, 70% shelf exam), both p < 0.001. There was a significant association with performance in the highest quartile (Q1) of weekly quiz scores and receiving live lectures (40% vs. recorded lectures 1%, p < 0.001). Comparing only MS3 students, mean weekly quiz scores and Q1 achievement were significantly higher (both p < 0.001) in the teleconference cohort with no significant difference in NBME shelf exam performance (p = 0.971). No difference in OSCE performance was observed between groups. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that synchronous teleconferences may be more effective than recorded lectures for achieving institutional learning objectives on the surgery clerkship without any negative impact on NBME shelf exam or clinical evaluation parameters. This information should be used to inform future institutional clerkship design and educational initiatives.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical student education: Implementation and outcome of a virtual general surgery curriculum.

BACKGROUND: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, medical schools were forced to adapt clinical curricula. The University of Washington School of Medicine created a hybrid in person and virtual general surgery clerkship. METHODS: The third year general surgery clerkship was modified to a 4-week in person and 2-week virtual clerkship to accommodate the same number of learners in less time. All students completed a survey to assess the impact of the virtual clerkship. RESULTS: The students preferred faculty lectures over national modules in the virtual clerkship. 58.6% indicated they would prefer the virtual component before the in-person experience. There was no change from previous years in final grades or clerkship exam scores after this hybrid curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: If the need for a virtual general surgery curriculum arises again in the future, learners value this experience at the beginning of the clerkship and prefer faculty lectures over national modules.

Validation of Use of Flipped Classroom for Surgery Core Clerkships.

BACKGROUND: The flipped classroom (FC) is an integrated learning paradigm that equips students with self-directed study materials before scheduled meeting times allowing for the deeper application of acquired knowledge with an instructor. There is limited data on the application of FC to clinical undergraduate medical education and particularly as it applies to a surgical clerkship. METHODS: This study is a four-year retrospective study that includes two cohorts of students who matriculated through two training paradigms, traditional classroom (TC) and FC. Information regarding the FC cohort was collected from June 2018 to July 2020 (N=166). A two-year matched historical cohort of students enrolled in the clerkship and taught with the TC paradigm from June 2016 to July 2018 was used for comparison (N=157). The primary aim of this study is to assess the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) surgery shelf performance when the FC model is utilized compared to the TC model. This study will validate a prior similar study that had a smaller cohort with different secondary endpoints. Therefore, the secondary aim of this study assesses how teaching style can affect other performance metrics of a rotation (such as clinical performance, quizzes, Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE), and practicums) and how time was utilized by faculty, staff, and students. RESULTS: There was no difference in overall NBME surgery shelf performance when comparing the FC to the traditional classroom teaching (68.94 vs 70.34, P= 0.1667). Likewise, there was no difference in quiz performance. The FC did allow instructors to spend more time in other clinical components of the curriculum leading to a significant difference in student practicum (84.2 vs 88.26, P = 0.0186) and OSCE grades (87.54 vs 90.58, P <0.0001). CONCLUSION: The surgery NBME shelf performance is not compromised by FC and therefore can be used as an alternative to traditional classroom setting for teaching medical knowledge to surgery clerkship students. In addition, the FC can improve time management for instructors allowing for improved teaching and development in other components of the surgery curriculum.

A Novel Educational Tool to Improve Medical Student Knowledge Acquisition During Surgical Rotations.

BACKGROUND: The addition of a novel education tool helps students improve understanding of general surgery topics. However, the effect of the new tool on objective exam performance is unknown. MATERIALS: A 10-item card of high-yield general surgery topics was implemented in the third-year surgery clerkship. Students reviewed these topics with general surgery residents. Scores from the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) surgery subject exam and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) board exam were compared among students who completed the Ask-a-Resident Topic card to a control group. RESULTS: Students who participated in the curriculum demonstrated significantly better scores on the NBME Surgery exam, t (236) = -2.56, P = .006. There was not a significant effect of the curriculum on Step 2 CK scores, although students who participated in the curriculum (M = 250.7, SD = 13.4) achieved higher scores than the control group (M = 247.8, SD = 14.2). DISCUSSION: The novel curriculum may improve objective student performance on standardized surgery exams.

Perioperative Clerkship Design for Students with Physical Disabilities: A Model for Implementation.

OBJECTIVE: Disability inclusion is an important and growing area of focus for medical education that may be stymied by stereotypes about disabilities, lack of knowledge about accommodations for students with physical disabilities, or outdated technical standards that preclude participation of people with mobility disabilities. To support the inclusion of students with physical disability in surgical clerkships, we describe a proactive, progressive approach to the accommodations process for a student with a thoracic spinal cord injury entering a surgical clerkship. DESIGN: Working proactively, medical school leadership, disability professionals and the clerkship team collaborated on the development of reasonable accommodations for a student with a thoracic spinal cord injury entering a surgical clerkship. SETTING: University of Colorado, Department of Surgery and Department of Medical Education, Aurora, CO. PARTICIPANTS: A third-year medical student and faculty from the medical school and surgical clerkship leaders. RESULTS: An M3 student with a thoracic spinal cord injury successfully completed an 8-week surgical clerkship completing all required procedural and clinical skills utilizing reasonable accommodation. The student achieved a grade of honors for the rotation. CONCLUSIONS: Early communication and planning for disability-related adjustments are critical to ensure an accessible experience for students with physical disabilities. The addition of a student with a disability adds to a better understanding of inclusive practices for surgical education and adds to the diversity of thought and experience for the medical education community.

The Effect of a Microlearning Module on Knowledge Acquisition in Surgery Clerkship Students.

OBJECTIVE: Microlearning has been found to be beneficial in other areas of healthcare education. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a microlearning module compared to a traditional online learning module in undergraduate medical education. DESIGN: A microlearning module was developed to cover the etiology and management of gallbladder disease. Surgery clerkship students were randomized into 2 groups. One group began with the microlearning module (MLM). The second group began with a 45 minute commercially available module centered on gallbladder disease (WISE-MD™). Halfway through the clerkship, the groups crossed over to the other learning intervention. Student knowledge was assessed with a test at three time points (pre-test, post-test1, post-test2). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Third year surgery clerkship students at George Washington University. RESULTS: There were 56 students in the MLM and 57 in WISE-MDTM groups. In the MLM group, mean scores significantly increased from pre-test to post-test1 and pre-test to post-test2, but significantly decreased from post-test1 to post-test2. In the WISE-MD™ group, mean scores significantly increased from pre-test to post-test1 and pre-test to post-test2, with no significant change from post-test1 to post-test2. After the initial intervention, test scores of post-test1 of the MLM group were significantly higher than the WISE-MD™ group, while there were no significant differences between groups at the pre-test or post-test2 time points. CONCLUSIONS: Students exposed to the microlearning module first performed significantly better on a post intervention test than students that used a commercially available product in our standard curriculum. Therefore, the use of microlearning modules may lead to improved knowledge acquisition in surgery clerkship students.

Surgical clerkship: Do examination scores correlate with clinical performance?

BACKGROUND: This study aims to determine if there are correlations between clinical performance and objective grading parameters for medical students in the third-year surgery clerkship. METHODS: Clerkship grades were compiled from 2016 to 2020. Performance on clinical rotations, NBME shelf exam, oral exam, and weekly quizzes were reviewed. Students were divided into quartiles (Q1-Q4) based on clinical performance. Standard statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: There were 625 students included in the study. Students in Q1+Q2 were more likely than those in Q3+Q4 to score in the top quartile on the shelf exam (29% vs. 19%, p = 0.002), oral exam (24% vs. 17%, p = 0.032), and quizzes (22% vs. 15%, p = 0.024). However, there was negligible correlation between clinical performance and performance on objective measures: shelf exam (R2 = 0.027, p < 0.001), oral exam (R2 = 0.021, p < 0.001), and weekly quizzes (R2 = 0.053, p = 0.092). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical performance does not correlate with objective grading parameters for medical students in the third-year surgery clerkship.

Evaluating knowledge and skill in surgery clerkship during covid 19 pandemics: A single-center experience in Indonesia.

BACKGROUNDS: Surgery clerkship for medical students has been changed in response to clinical exposure limitation due to this pandemic. This study aim to evaluate knowledge and skill of students in surgery clerkship in covid 19 pandemics. METHODS: Cross-Sectional design comparing surgery clerkship before and during COVID-19.A total of 270 fourth and fifth-year medical students have enrolled in surgery clerkship from June 2019-October 2020 were selected for this study. Each student had completed education and training in the hospital for nine weeks in the rotation. RESULTS: There is no significant difference in MCQs scores before and during the pandemic. However, a significant difference was found in OSCE scores. CONCLUSIONS: Combining virtual platforms and in-person clinical rotation is an effective surgery clerkship curriculum, particularly in pandemic covid 19. There are no different skill and knowledge results before and during the pandemic analyzed from MCQs and OSCE exam.

Medical student attitudes and actions that encourage teaching on surgery clerkships.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical faculty and residents are responsible for the clinical education of medical students during their core surgical clerkship, sub-internships, and clinical electives. Much attention has been paid to faculty development in teaching, as well as residents-as-teachers programs, to enhance student learning in the surgical environment. This focus to "train the trainers" has not addressed what medical students can do to take ownership of and improve their own learning, as partners in educational interactions. The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate how medical students' attitudes and actions can enhance clinical teaching interactions during surgical rotations. METHODS: Previously collected data from a multiple case study that explored the learning environment at a single academic medical center was analyzed to understand the roles that students play in their learning. The data includes transcriptions from semi-structured interviews with four 4th year mediacl students, three general surgery residents, and four surgery attendings, and focus groups with two sets of 3rd year medical students. Two authors employed thematic analysis to code the data. RESULTS: Findings were organized into five themes: eagerness, humility, confidence, team player, and adaptability. Each attitudinal theme was associated with specific actions that students adopted to encourage teaching behaviors from resident and faculty surgeons during their surgery rotations. Participants discussed the importance of students "seek[ing] out opportunities" for learning (eagerness) and being "willing to be wrong" (humility). Student expressions of confidence in their knowledge and skills were marked by following "steps that I know," which signaled to teachers that they could be entrusted to participate in patient care. Students categorized as team players "follow[ed] up on information without specifically being told." Finally, students categorized as adaptable responded to "immediate feedback" by making "adjustments." CONCLUSIONS: Medical students are important stakeholders and contributors to teaching interactions and are likely to impact their own learning experience through the adoption of key attitudes and associated actions.

Where Do We Go From Here? Assessing Medical Students' Surgery Clerkship Preparedness During COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of COVID-19 on surgical education has been profound, and clinical learning experiences transitioned to virtual formats. This study investigated the impact of virtual experiences created to facilitate learning during the pandemic for medical students. METHODS: We performed a cohort study to determine the perceived clinical preparedness for medical students enrolled in the preclinical surgery pilot course, surgical Extended Mastery Learning Rotation (EMLR), and longitudinal surgical clerkship (LC). The preclinical surgery pilot course took place before COVID-19 disruptions, and the EMLR and LC experiences took place virtually. Specialty choice was examined in the EMLR and LC cohorts. Performance on the NBME surgical assessments was analyzed among students enrolled in the traditional clerkship and pandemic-disrupted courses and compared to national data using a two-sample t-test. RESULTS: Compared to preclinical students, EMLR and LC students demonstrated improvements in their perceived surgical clerkship readiness. After the 3-week EMLR course, in the setting of completing only one-third of the clerkship year, students had an average NBME Surgical Self-Assessment Exam score of 72 (SD 12), comparable to the national average of 71 (SD 9) p = 0.33. The average shelf exam score for students (N = 24) enrolled in the traditional clerkship (block 1), prior to COVID-19, disruptions was 66 (SD 9) compared to an average score of 69 (SD 9) for the longitudinal clerkship students (N = 20) that took the shelf exam later in the year (p = 0.36). COVID-19 disruptions did not affect specialty choice. All LC students have decided on a specialty; 50% nonsurgical and 50% surgical. From the EMLR cohort, 36% and 38% plan to pursue surgical and nonsurgical specialties, respectively, with 26% still undecided. CONCLUSIONS: Courses were well-liked and will be implemented in future clerkships. Surgical educators demonstrated flexibility and creativity in the development of the EMLR. Despite COVID-19 disruptions, medical students made progress in their clinical skills and foundational science knowledge. COVID-19 disruptions did not appear to impact specialty choice.

Near-Peer Learning During the Surgical Clerkship: A Way to Facilitate Learning After a 15-Month Preclinical Curriculum.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the performance and perspectives of third-year medical students (MS3s) participating in near-peer learning (NPL) sessions during their core surgical clerkship following a 15-month preclerkship curriculum. DESIGN: An evaluation study of 7 NPL sessions developed and implemented by fourth-year medical students (MS4s) held from March 2019 to February 2020. MS4s taught 1-2 sessions per rotation that included test taking strategies, illness script development, radiology review, case-based multiple-choice questions, and rapid review. Participants completed a questionnaire with 11 seven-point Likert and open-ended questions after each session. Analyses included quantitative comparison of shelf score averages between NPL participants and nonparticipants and qualitative content analysis for open-ended questions. SETTING: Surgical clerkship at the University of California, San Francisco. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-eight (32%) MS3s participated, with an average attendance of 10 students per rotation. Thirty-three (69%) participants completed the questionnaire. RESULTS: MS3s enjoyed the session (6.9 ± 0.4), improved their knowledge (6.8 ± 0.5), and felt more prepared for the surgery shelf examination (6.5 ± 0.6). MS4 leaders found that MS3s always wanted radiology review, and their interest in test taking strategies and illness script development declined across the clerkship year. Participants had lower shelf exam scores compared to nonparticipants (68.1 vs 71.4, respectively; p = 0.04, ES = 0.03). Shelf exam scores increased over time in both cohorts. Each group had 2 shelf exam failures. Qualitative analysis suggests that MS3s appreciated the NPL's tailored approach and exam demystification, with a desire for increased NPL integration into the clerkship. CONCLUSION: Students participating in NPL were satisfied with the sessions. Participants may have been students who struggled as indicated by shelf exam scores and appreciated the support. The shift in preferred topics across the blocks reflects the students' development during clerkships. Near-peer teachers should adjust sessions over time to fit students' evolving needs.