Early Results and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) of an Intraosseous Device for Arthrodesis of the First Tarso-Metatarsal (TMT) Joint.

Background: We describe a new surgical technique for arthrodesis of the first tarso-metatarsal (TMT) joint using an intraosseous fixation device and the early results including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS). Materials and Methods: Seventeen consecutive procedures with this method were included. Indication for surgery was hallux valgus. The average age was 42 years (range 26-65). PROMS were collected and the patients were asked to fill out a satisfaction questionnaire. A retrospective review of radiographs and electronic medical notes was conducted. Results: Overall fusion rate was 94%. Complications included a case of failed fusion, a superficial wound infection and a deep vein thrombosis (DVT). At a mean follow-up of 24 months (range 10-38) radiographic results demonstrated significant improvement in the intermetatarsal angle or IMA (11.7 ± 2.8 degrees to 6.9 ± 2.4 degrees, P < 0.001) and hallux valgus angle or HVA (28.1 ± 7.3 degrees to 12.2 ± 4.3 degrees, P < 0.001). The mean visual analog scale (VAS) score improved significantly from a mean of 7.6 (SD 0.85) preoperatively, to a mean of 2.1 (SD 1.83) post-operatively (P < 0.0001). The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) significantly improved from a mean of 35.8 (SD 10.2), to a mean of 9.2 (SD 17) (P < 0.0001). The final result was satisfactory for 88% of the patients. Conclusions: The early results show intraosseous fixation to be a safe and efficient method for the fusion of the first TMT joint providing good patient satisfaction.

Multiplanar instability of the first tarsometatarsal joint in hallux valgus and hallux rigidus patients: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Hypermobility of the first ray has been considered associated with various forefoot diseases including hallux valgus (HV) and hallux rigidus (HR). Weightbearing CT scan can be a reliable method for analysis of the first tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint in axial, sagittal, and coronal planes. Our objective was to comparatively investigate signs of instability of the first TMT joint on weightbearing CT between three groups (control, HV, and HR). METHODS: In this single-centre, retrospective, case-control study, 27 HV patients (30 feet; mean age 54.2 years), 26 HR patients (30 feet; mean age 56.6 years), and 30 controls (30 feet; mean age; 43 years) were enrolled. Measurements of signs of instability were performed in multiplanes including first TMT angle, dorsal translation of the first metatarsal (M1) at the first TMT joint, plantar distance between the medial cuneiform (C1) and M1 in sagittal plane, hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA) in axial plane, rotational profiles of C1 and M1 in coronal plane. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and chi-square test were performed to compare each parameter between the three groups. Interobserver reliabilities were assessed using interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: The HV group had significantly increased first TMT angle (0.23° in controls, 1.15° in HV, 0.19° in HR, p < 0.001), HVA (7.52°, 33.50°, 11.21°, p < 0.001), IMA (9.46°, 16.98°, 11.87°, p < 0.001), C1-M1 angle (22.44°, 29.46°, 23.74°, p < 0.001), and rotational profile of the distal M1 (7.06°, 17.88°, 9.85°, p < 0.001) compared with the control and HR groups. Dorsal translation of M1 (23% in controls, 63% in HV, 70% in HR, p < 0.001) was frequently found in the HV and HR groups with significantly increased plantar distance (0.37 mm, 1.14 mm, 1.46 mm, p < 0.001) compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: Multiplanar instability of the first TMT joint was confirmed using weightbearing CT in HV and HR groups compared with controls. HV group demonstrated instability mainly in sagittal and axial planes; HR group had sagittal instability predominantly. Our measurement of rotational instability at the first TMT joint was not able to detect differences between groups. A surgical correction of the instability at the first TMT joint can be an option to address HV and HR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: First ray hypermobility at the first TMT joint is an important consideration when addressing HV and HR, a surgical correction of the instability at the first TMT joint should be taken in consideration as an option.

Relationship of Radiographic and Clinical Parameters With Hallux Valgus and Second Ray Pathology.

BACKGROUND: Hallux valgus is frequently associated with additional forefoot pathologies, including hammertoes and midfoot osteoarthritis (OA). However, the pathogenesis of these concurrent pathologies remains to be elucidated. We sought to determine whether there is a relationship between demographic and radiographic parameters and the incidence of secondary pathologies in the setting of a bunion, with an emphasis on second tarsometatarsal (TMT) OA and hammertoes. METHODS: A total of 153 patients (172 feet) who underwent reconstruction for hallux valgus were divided into 3 groups: (1) bunion only (61 patients), (2) bunion with hammertoe without second TMT joint OA (78 patients), and (3) bunion with second TMT joint OA (14 patients). Preoperative age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) as well as hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), metatarsus adductus angle (MAA), ratio of second to first metatarsal length, and Meary's angle were recorded. One-way analysis of variance (normality demonstrated) and Kruskal-Wallis (normality not demonstrated) tests were used to assess differences in continuous variables. Post hoc tests were conducted with the Bonferroni technique. Associations between discrete variables and the study groups were analyzed using χ2 tests. Following the univariate analysis, multinomial logistic regression models were built to determine potential risk factors for hammertoe or TMT OA group placement. RESULTS: Patients in the hammertoe and TMT OA groups were significantly older than patients in the bunion only group ( P < .001 for both pairwise comparisons) and had significantly higher BMIs ( P = .024 and P < .001, respectively). Patients in the TMT OA group had a significantly higher mean HVA than patients in the bunion-only group ( P = .004) and a significantly higher mean MAA relative to both other study groups ( P ≤ .001 for both comparisons). IMA, Meary's angle, and the ratio of second to first metatarsal length did not differ significantly between groups. In the multivariate analysis, hammertoe group assignment was predicted only by age and HVA, while midfoot OA group assignment was predicted by age, HVA, BMI, and MAA. CONCLUSION: Our data show that older age and increased HVA were predictors of both second ray pathologies studied. Higher BMI and MAA were predictive only of TMT joint OA. These data may help identify patients with hallux valgus who are at greater risk for developing secondary pathologies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Radiological Analysis of Osteoarthritis of the Second Metatarsophlangeal and Tarsometatarsal Joint / 대한족부족관절학회지

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the radiological characteristics of the osteoarthritis of the second metatarsophalangeal (MTP) and tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2002 and August 2010, 27 patients (33 feet) who had second metatarsal osteoarthritis (OA) were reviewed retrospectively. Group 1 was 14 patients (17 feet) with second MTP joint OA. Group 2 was 13 patients (16 feet) with second TMT joint OA. Group 3 was 24 patients (25 feet) had hallux valgus without second metatarsal (MT) OA as control. Weight bearing foot anteroposterior (AP) and lateral view were checked, and measured hallux valgus angle, metatarsus adductus angle (MAA), second MT functional length, first and second MT length by Hardy & Clapham method on AP view, angle of second MT with horizontal plane, calcaneal pitch, talo-first MT on lateral view. RESULTS: On weight bearing foot AP view, second MT functional length of group 1, 2, 3 was 2.4 mm, -0.1 mm, 0.7 mm and MAA of group 1, 2, 3 was 17.7degrees, 17.7degrees, 14.5degrees. Second MT functional length of group 1 was longer than control group and it was statistically significant. MAA was significant different between group 1-3 and group 2-3. Angle of second MT with horizontal plane of group 2 was smaller than control group and it was statistically significant. Other radiographic parameters have no statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Group 1 has long functional length of second MT and group 2 has small angle of second MT with horizontal plane.