Tenecteplase versus alteplase before stroke thrombectomy: outcomes after system-wide transitions in Pennsylvania.

INTRODUCTION: United States stroke systems are increasingly transitioning from alteplase (TPA) to tenecteplase (TNK). Real-world data on the safety and effectiveness of replacing TPA with TNK before large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke endovascular treatment (EVT) are lacking. METHODS: Four Pennsylvania stroke systems transitioned from TPA to TNK during the study period 01/2020-06/2023. LVO stroke patients who received intravenous thrombolysis with TPA or TNK before EVT were reviewed. Multivariate logistic analysis was conducted adjusting for age, sex, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), occlusion site, last-known-well-to-intravenous thrombolysis time, interhospital-transfer and stroke system. RESULTS: Of 635 patients, 309 (48.7%) received TNK and 326 (51.3%) TPA prior to EVT. The site of occlusion was the M1 middle cerebral artery (MCA) (47.7%), M2 MCA (25.4%), internal carotid artery (14.0%), tandem carotid with M1 or M2 MCA (9.8%) and basilar artery (3.1%). A favorable functional outcome (90-day mRS ≤ 2) was observed in 47.6% of TNK and 49.7% of TPA patients (p = 0.132). TNK versus TPA groups had similar rates of early recanalization (11.9% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.259), successful endovascular reperfusion (93.5% vs. 89.3%, p = 0.627), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (3.2% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.218) and 90-day all-cause mortality (23.1% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.491). CONCLUSIONS: This U.S. multicenter real-world clinical experience demonstrated that switching from TPA to TNK before EVT for LVO stroke resulted in similar endovascular reperfusion, safety, and functional outcomes.

"Intraosseous Administration of Tenecteplase for Thrombolysis of an Acute Ischemic Stroke".

INTRO: Current guidelines for acute ischemic stroke recommend timely administration of intravascular thrombolytic therapy to promote functional and neurologic outcomes. Tenecteplase is an emerging off-label therapy for this indication and being utilized by various institutions due to its simpler administration strategy. In emergent situations in which intravenous access cannot be obtained, intraosseous access is a viable option for medication administration. However, there has been minimal published cases to support the efficacy and safety of intraosseous administration of tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke. CASE: We describe the case of a 51-year-old woman who developed acute ischemic stroke within our institution. Due to difficulty achieving intravenous access and time-dependent efficacy of thrombolytic therapy, the decision was made to administer tenecteplase by the intraosseous route. Stroke symptoms improved within 48 hours following administration without complication. CONCLUSION: Intraosseous administration of tenecteplase may be considered for treatment of acute ischemic stroke if intravenous access is unattainable.

Low-dose tenecteplase during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in massive pulmonary embolism.

We report the case of an 18-year-old male who presented to the Emergency Department with sudden onset dyspnea. The patient was intubated on arrival, but suffered a cardiac arrest soon after. Point-of-care echocardiography during cardiopulmonary resuscitation revealed a grossly dilated right atrium and right ventricle, which alerted the Emergency physician to the possibility of massive pulmonary embolism leading to cardiac arrest. Due to no discernible history or risk factors in favour of pulmonary embolism, a decision was taken for thrombolysis with half dose Tenecteplase. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved 14 min after thrombolysis, with massive pulmonary embolism subsequently being confirmed on CT Pulmonary Angiography.

Successful use of intra venous tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke in pregnancy.

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with tenecteplase or alteplase is the standard of care in, patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) presenting within 3-4.5 h. However here, are no established guidelines for such treatment during pregnancy. We report a case, of AIS in third trimester of pregnancy successfully treated with Tenecteplase. To the, best of our knowledge, this is the first and only case of acute ischemic stroke in, pregnancy treated with Tenecteplase.

Angioedema After Use of Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activators in Stroke.

Angioedema without concomitant urticaria is a well-known complication of treatment with the recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA) alteplase and its genetically modified variant tenecteplase. It is potentially lethal when causing airway obstruction and can require intubation. The latest guideline for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association advises to treat this complication initially by interfering with the histamine pathway. This article aims to clarify the pathophysiological mechanism of r-tPA-induced angioedema and provides several arguments that this condition is primarily bradykinin-mediated and hence should be treated initially by intervening with the bradykinin pathway. Second, other-less frequently reported-adverse symptoms after r-tPA therapy and their proposed pathophysiological mechanisms leading to specific treatment are described. This manuscript describes the need for an update of the section "3.5 IV alteplase" from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guideline to treat this r-tPA-induced angioedema adequately and prevent potentially fatal outcomes.

Second-dose intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase in alteplase-resistant medium-vessel-occlusion strokes: A retrospective and comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: In intracranial medium-vessel occlusions (MeVOs), intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) shows inconsistent effectiveness and endovascular interventions remains unproven. We evaluated a new therapeutic strategy based on a second IVT using tenecteplase for MeVOs without early recanalization post-alteplase. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, comparative study included consecutively low bleeding risk MeVO patients treated with alteplase 0.9 mg/kg at two stroke centers. One center used a conventional single-IVT approach; the other applied a dual-IVT strategy, incorporating a 1-h post-alteplase MRI and additional tenecteplase, 0.25 mg/kg, if occlusion persisted. Primary outcomes were 24-h successful recanalization for efficacy and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) for safety. Secondary outcomes included 3-month excellent outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1). Comparisons were conducted in the overall cohort and a propensity score-matched subgroup. RESULTS: Among 146 patients in the dual-IVT group, 103 failed to achieve recanalization at 1 h and of these 96 met all eligible criteria and received additional tenecteplase. Successful recanalization at 24 h was higher in the 146 dual-IVT cohort patients than in the 148 single-IVT cohort patients (84% vs 61%, p < 0.0001), with similar sICH rate (3 vs 2, p = 0.68). Dual-IVT strategy was an independent predictor of 24-h successful recanalization (OR, 2.7 [95% CI, 1.52-4.88]; p < 0.001). Dual-IVT cohort patients achieved higher rates of excellent outcome (69% vs 44%, p < 0.0001). Propensity score matching analyses supported all these associations. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, a dual-IVT strategy in selected MeVO patients was associated with higher odds of 24-h recanalization, with no safety concerns. However, potential center-level confounding and biases seriously limit these findings' interpretation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05809921.

Clot migration in patients treated with tenecteplase versus alteplase before mechanical thrombectomy.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to describe and analyze the rate of clot migration of vessel thrombosis to distal segments in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who received intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with tenecteplase (TNK) and alteplase (ALT) before mechanical thrombectomy (MT). In addition, we aimed to determine the relationship between thrombus migration and functional prognosis. METHODS: This study followed the STROBE reporting guidelines. We performed a retrospective analysis of a series of patients from November 2017 to April 2023 with an AIS with thrombosis on CT imaging, treated with IVT (TNK or ALT, split into two distinct groups) prior to mechanical thrombectomy. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-six patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) were included. Ninety-six had received TNK. One hundred and sixty had received ALT. Of the 96 TNK patients, 25 experienced either complete recanalization (n = 3) or thrombus migration (n = 22). Of the 160 ALT patients, 20 experienced either complete recanalization (n = 6) or thrombus migration (n = 14). The difference being statistically substantial for the thrombus migration rate (OR = 3.61, 95% confidence interval: 1.63; 7.98). Migration to an irretrievable very distal segment occurred in four (4%) patients with TNK and in three patients (2%) with ALT (p > 0.05). Thrombus migration was not significantly associated to a different functional prognosis, measured through Rankin scale after 3 months (OR = 0.44, 95% confidence interval: 0.17; 1.12). CONCLUSION: The use of TNK over ALT as a fibrinolytic agent is associated with a higher thrombus migration rate. The migration of thrombi to distal segments, which are theoretically less accessible for mechanical thrombectomy, did not result in worse clinical outcomes.

Comparative efficacy and safety among different doses of tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Tenecteplase (TNK) is a promising alternative to alteplase (ALT) as the thrombolytic agent for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, its clinical outcomes in certain populations remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety among different doses of TNK in AIS patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase for studies comparing at least one dose of TNK to another dose of TNK or ALT 0.90 mg/kg. We conducted Bayesian network meta-analyses to estimate the relative risks (RRs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) for all outcomes using ALT 0.90 mg/kg as the reference. The treatments were ranked according to their surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) values. RESULTS: We included 11 trials from 16 publications comprising 5423 participants. There were no significant differences between any doses of TNK and ALT for reperfusion, 3-month modified Rankin Score (mRS) 0-1 (rank 1st: TNK 0.25 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.68), mRS 0-2 (rank 1st: TNK 0.25 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.86), mortality (rank 1st: TNK 0.25 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.82), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (rank 1st: TNK 0.25 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.88), symptomatic ICH (sICH) (rank 1st: TNK 0.10 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.70), and parenchymal hematoma (rank 1st: TNK 0.10 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.68). TNK 0.40 mg/kg had a significantly higher sICH rate compared to TNK 0.25 mg/kg (RR = 2.39, 95% CrI = 1.00-7.92). Among elderly patients, TNK 0.25 mg/kg had a significantly lower rate of sICH than ALT 0.9 mg/kg (RR = 3.0 × 10-13, 95% CrI = 3.4 × 10-40-0.07). CONCLUSIONS: TNK has efficacy and safety outcomes comparable to those of ALT. TNK 0.25 mg/kg may be the optimal dose of TNK for patients with AIS.

Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the elderly patients: a post hoc analysis of the TRACE-2 trial.

BACKGROUND: The benefit-risk profile of tenecteplase in the elderly patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is uncertain. We sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase compared with alteplase for AIS patients aged ≥80 years. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the Tenecteplase Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischaemic Cerebrovascular Events-2 Trial, a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority clinical trial. Disabling AIS patients aged ≥80 years who initiated intravenous thrombolytics within 4.5 hours of symptom onset were enrolled from June 2021 to May 2022 across 53 centres in China and were randomly allocated to receive 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase or 0.9 mg/kg alteplase. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of participants with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1 at 90 days. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) within 36 hours was the safety outcome. RESULTS: Of 137 participants, mRS 0-1 at 90 days occurred in 37 (49.3%) of 75 in the tenecteplase group vs 20 (33.9%) of 59 in the alteplase group (risk ratio (RR) 1.47, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.23). sICH within 36 hours was observed in 3 (4.0%) of 76 in the tenecteplase group and two (3.3%) of 61 in the alteplase group (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.20 to 8.41). CONCLUSIONS: The risk-benefit profile of tenecteplase thrombolysis was preserved in the elderly patients, which lends further support to intravenous 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase as an alternative to alteplase in these patients.

Intravenous tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke between 4.5 and 6 h of onset (EXIT-BT2): Rationale and Design.

RATIONALE: To date, the benefit of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients without advanced neuroimaging selection is confined to within 4.5 h of onset. Our phase II EXIT-BT (Extending the tIme window of Thrombolysis by ButylphThalide up to 6 h after onset) trial suggested the safety, feasibility, and potential benefit of intravenous tenecteplase (TNK) in AIS between 4.5 and 6 h of onset. The EXIT-BT2 trial is a pivotal study undertaken to confirm or refute this signal. AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of TNK for AIS between 4.5 and 6 h of onset with or without endovascular treatment. SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATES: A maximum of 1440 patients are required to test the superiority hypothesis with 80% power according to a two-sided 0.05 level of significance, stratified by age, sex, history of diabetes, location of vessel occlusion, baseline National Institute of Health stroke scale score, stroke etiology, and plan for endovascular treatment. DESIGN: EXIT-BT2 is a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded assessment of endpoint (PROBE), and multi-center study. Eligible AIS patients between 4.5 and 6 h of onset are randomly assigned 1:1 into a TNK group or control group. The TNK group will receive TNK (0.25 mg/kg, a single bolus over 5-10 s, maximum 25 mg). The control group will receive standard medical care in compliance with national guidelines for acute ischemic stroke. Both groups will receive standard stroke care from randomization to 90 days after stroke onset according to national guidelines. OUTCOME: The primary efficacy endpoint is excellent functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score 0-1 at 90 days after randomization, while the primary safety endpoint is symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, defined as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score increase ⩾4 caused by intracranial hemorrhage within 24 (-6/+12) h after randomization. CONCLUSIONS: The results of EXIT-BT2 may determine whether intravenous TNK has a favorable risk/benefit profile in AIS between 4.5 and 6 h of onset.

Lack of Interactions Between Alteplase/Tenecteplase and the Adenosine A1R/A3R Agonist AST-004.

BACKGROUND: AST-004, a small molecule agonist of the adenosine A1 and A3 receptors, is a potential cerebroprotectant for patients with acute stroke and is currently in clinical trials. Drug-drug interactions are critically important to assess in the context of acute stroke care. Lytic therapy with tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator)-induced plasmin formation (alteplase) is the only available pharmacotherapy for acute stroke. Consequently, it is imperative to evaluate potential interactions between AST-004 and tPAs such as alteplase and tenecteplase. METHODS: The interactions between AST-004 and tPAs were evaluated in 3 ways in preparation for AST-004 phase II trials. First, the metabolic stability of AST-004 was determined in the presence of alteplase and plasmin. Second, the potential for AST-004 to influence the thrombolytic efficacy of alteplase and tenecteplase was evaluated with an in vitro assay system utilizing a fluorogenic substrate of plasmin. Finally, the potential for AST-004 to influence the thrombolytic efficacy of alteplase was also determined with an in vitro thrombolysis assay of human blood thrombi. RESULTS: Neither alteplase nor plasmin affected the stability of AST-004 in vitro. In 2 different in vitro systems, AST-004 had no effect on the ability of alteplase or tenecteplase to generate plasmin, and AST-004 had no effect on the thrombolytic efficacy of alteplase to lyse blood clots in human blood. CONCLUSIONS: These studies indicate that there will be no interactions between AST-004 and tPAs such as alteplase or tenecteplase in patients with stroke undergoing thrombolytic therapy.

Real-world data of tenecteplase vs. alteplase in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a single-center analysis.

Background: This retrospective observational cohort study aimed to evaluate whether tenecteplase's use for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has time management advantages and clinical benefits. Methods: 144 AIS patients treated with alteplase and 120 with tenecteplase were included. We compared baseline clinical characteristics, key reperfusion therapy time indices [onset-to-treatment time (OTT), door-to-needle time (DNT), and door-to-puncture time (DPT)] and clinical outcomes (24-h post-thrombolysis NIHSS improvement, and intracranial hemorrhage incidence) between the groups using univariate analysis. We assessed hospital stay durations and used binary logistic regression to examine tenecteplase's association with DNT and DPT target times, NIHSS improvement, and intracranial hemorrhage. Results: Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences except hyperlipidemia and atrial fibrillation. OTT (133 vs. 163.72, p = 0.001), DNT (36.5 vs. 50, p < 0.001) and DPT (117 vs. 193, p = 0.002) were significantly faster in the tenecteplase group. The rates of DNT ≤ 45 min (65.83% vs. 40.44%, p < 0.001) and DPT ≤ 120 min (59.09% vs. 13.79%, p = 0.001) were significantly higher in the tenecteplase group. Tenecteplase was an independent predictor of achieving target DNT (OR 2.951, 95% CI 1.732-5.030; p < 0.001) and DPT (OR 7.867, 95% CI 1.290-47.991; p = 0.025). Clinically, the proportion NIHSS improvement 24 h post-thrombolysis was higher in the tenecteplase group (64.17% vs. 50%, p = 0.024). No significant differences were observed in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) or any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Patients receiving tenecteplase had shorter hospital stays (6 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001). Tenecteplase was an independent predictor of NIHSS improvement at 24 h (OR 1.715, 95% CI 1.011-2.908; p = 0.045). There was no significant association between thrombolytic choice and sICH or any ICH. Conclusion: Tenecteplase significantly reduced DNT and DPT. It was associated with early neurological function improvement (at 24 h), without compromising safety compared to alteplase. The findings support tenecteplase's application in AIS.

Implementation of a Tenecteplase Protocol for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke in a Health System.

Purpose. Alteplase is the standard of care for intravenous thrombolytic treatment of acute ischemic stroke, but recent evidence suggests that tenecteplase may be as safe and efficacious. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the direct cost savings, safety, and efficacy outcomes following the implementation of a tenecteplase protocol for acute ischemic stroke in the emergency departments within a health system. Methods. A multicenter retrospective medical record review was performed for 4 months prior to protocol implementation on patients who received alteplase and for 4 months post-implementation on patients who received tenecteplase. The primary outcome was the direct cost difference associated with tenecteplase. Secondary outcomes included reduction in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 24 hours after thrombolytic therapy, door-to-needle time, symptom onset to intravenous thrombolysis time, incidence of adverse effects, and death. Results. Pre-implementation, 102 received alteplase and post-implementation, 117 received tenecteplase. Four months of utilization of tenecteplase resulted in direct cost savings of $209,476.80 for the health system, which translates to roughly $2,000 per patient. Reduction in the National Institutes for Health Stroke Scale were similar between the two groups with -3.96 in alteplase and -3.18 in tenecteplase (p = 0.952). Median door-to-needle time was 44.5 minutes in alteplase and 49 minutes in tenecteplase. Adverse events occurred in 19 patients in alteplase and 19 in tenecteplase (p = 0.573). Death occurred in 9 patients in alteplase and 14 patients in tenecteplase (p = 0.376). Conclusion. A tenecteplase protocol was successfully implemented in the healthcare system resulting in direct cost savings with no significant differences in adverse events.

Tenecteplase versus Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: A number of clinical trials have compared tenecteplase (TNK) and alteplase for the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and the results are inconsistent. Purpose: Present systematic review and meta-analysis is undertaken to analyse the efficacy and safety of TNK in AIS compared to alteplase. Summary: A thorough literature search was performed through the databases Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov, for a period from inception to September 2022, with the keywords i.e., "tenecteplase" and "alteplase" and "acute ischemic stroke." Clinical trials published in English that compared the efficacy and safety of TNK to alteplase in AIS were included. The major outcomes of this meta-analysis were proportion of patients free from disability and functional independence at 90 days, early neurological improvement at 24 hours, all-cause mortality at 90 days, patients with intra cranial hemorrhage (ICH), and patients with severe disability at 90 days. A total of nine studies with 3,573 patients were included in the analysis. The proportion of patients with freedom from disability was comparable in both groups (relative risk [RR] = 1.04, 95 per cent CI = 0.92-1.17; p = .53). Similarly, proportion of patients with functional independence was comparable (RR = 1.12, 95 per cent CI = 0.96-1.31; p = .14). TNK group had a higher rate of early neurological recovery (RR = 1.56, 95 per cent CI = 0.96-2.54; p = .07). All-cause mortality at 90 days was comparable in both groups (RR = 0.97; 95 per cent CI = 0.72-1.29; p = .82). The proportion of patients with ICH was higher in TNK group (RR = 1.14, 95 per cent CI = 0.77-1.68; p = .52). The proportion of patients with severe disability was less in TNK group (RR =0.84, 95 per cent CI = 0.53-1.32; p = .44). Key Message: TNK was similar to alteplase in terms of efficacy and safety. The patients in TNK group showed early neurological improvement but were simultaneously at higher risk of ICH. The TNK can be an alternative to alteplase if the benefits outweigh the risks.

Incidence and predictors of intracranial hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase.

BACKGROUND: Despite its increasing use, there are limited data on the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase in the setting of acute ischemic stroke. Our aim was to investigate the incidence and predictors of ICH after tenecteplase administration. METHODS: We reviewed data from the prospective ongoing multicenter TETRIS (Tenecteplase Treatment in Ischemic Stroke) registry. Patients with available day-1 imaging were included in this study. Clinical, imaging and biological variables were collected. Follow-up imaging performed 24 h after IVT was locally reviewed by senior neuroradiologists and neurologists. The incidence of parenchymal hematoma (PH) and any ICH were investigated. Potential predictors of PH and any ICH were assessed in multivariable logistic regressions. Subgroup analyses focusing on patients intended for endovascular treatment were performed. RESULTS: PH and any ICH occurred in 126/1321 (incidence rate: 9.5%, 95% CI 8.1-11.2) and 521/1321 (39.4%, 95% CI 36.8-42.1) patients, respectively. Symptomatic ICH was observed in 77/1321 (5.8%; 95% CI 4.7-7.2). PH occurrence was significantly associated with poorer functional outcomes (p < 0.0001) and death (p < 0.0001) after 3 months. Older age (aOR = 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.05), male gender (aOR = 2.07; 95% CI 1.28-3.36), a history of hypertension (aOR = 2.08; 95% CI 1.19-3.62), a higher baseline NIHSS (aOR = 1.07; 95% CI 1.03-1.10) and higher admission blood glucose level (aOR = 1.12; 95% CI 1.05-1.19) were independently associated with PH occurrence. Similar associations were observed in the subgroup of patients intended for endovascular treatment. CONCLUSION: We quantified the incidence of ICH after IVT with tenecteplase in a real-life prospective registry and determined independent predictors of ICH. These findings allow to identify patients at high risk of ICH.

Door to needle time trends after transition to tenecteplase: A Multicenter Texas stroke registry.

BACKGROUND: Tenecteplase (TNK) is considered a promising option for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with the potential to decrease door-to-needle times (DTN). This study investigates DTN metrics and trends after transition to tenecteplase. METHODS: The Lone Star Stroke (LSS) Research Consortium TNK registry incorporated data from three Texas hospitals that transitioned to TNK. Subject data mapped to Get-With-the-Guidelines stroke variables from October 1, 2019 to March 31, 2023 were limited to patients who received either alteplase (ALT) or TNK within the 90 min DTN times. The dataset was stratified into ALT and TNK cohorts with univariate tables for each measured variable and further analyzed using descriptive statistics. Logistic regression models were constructed for both ALT and TNK to investigate trends in DTN times. RESULTS: In the overall cohort, the TNK cohort (n = 151) and ALT cohort (n = 161) exhibited comparable population demographics, differing only in a higher prevalence of White individuals in the TNK cohort. Both cohorts demonstrated similar clinical parameters, including mean NIHSS, blood glucose levels, and systolic blood pressure at admission. In the univariate analysis, no difference was observed in median DTN time within the 90 min time window compared to the ALT cohort [40 min (30-53) vs 45 min (35-55); P = .057]. In multivariable models, DTN times by thrombolytic did not significantly differ when adjusting for NIHSS, age (P = .133), or race and ethnicity (P = .092). Regression models for the overall cohort indicate no significant DTN temporal trends for TNK (P = .84) after transition; nonetheless, when stratified by hospital, a single subgroup demonstrated a significant DTN upward trend (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In the overall cohort, TNK and ALT exhibited comparable temporal trends and at least stable DTN times. This indicates that the shift to TNK did not have an adverse impact on the DTN stroke metrics. This seamless transition is likely attributed to the similarity of inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as the administration processes for both medications. When stratified by hospital, the three subgroups demonstrated variable DTN time trends which highlight the potential for either fatigue or unpreparedness when switching to TNK. Because our study included a multi-ethnic cohort from multiple large Texas cities, the stable DTN times after transition to TNK is likely applicable to other healthcare systems.

Comprehensive Review of Tenecteplase for Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Although intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase remains the primary treatment for acute ischemic stroke, tenecteplase has shown potential advantages over alteplase. Animal studies have demonstrated the favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tenecteplase. Moreover, it is easier to administer. Clinical trials have demonstrated that tenecteplase is not inferior to alteplase and may even be superior in cases of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. Current evidence supports the time and cost benefits of tenecteplase, suggesting that it could potentially replace alteplase as the main option for thrombolytic therapy, especially in patients with large vessel occlusion.

First intravenous thrombolysis for pCys194Arg Notch 3 mutation in a Moroccan CADASIL patient with stroke.

Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leucoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is caused by mutations in the NOTCH3 gene. Clinical manifestations of CADASIL include lacunar infarcts, transient ischemic attacks, dementia, migraine, and psychiatric disorders. Cerebral MRI can show signal abnormalities in the basal ganglia and white matter, especially characteristic when located in the anterior part of the temporal lobe and external capsules. We report CADASIL patient treated with intravenous tenectelase for acute ischemic stroke, and we present a review of literature aimed to report effectiveness and safety of intravenous thrombolysis in CADASIL patients.