[Management of chronic non-oncologic pain by multicomponent programs using non-pharmacologic therapies: A systematic review of the literature]. / Manejo del dolor crónico no oncológico con programas multicomponentes de terapias no farmacológicas: revisión sistemática de la literatura.

Chronic pain is a public health problem suffered by 20% of the world's population. Pharmacological approaches are insufficient, so a multi-therapeutic approach that also includes non-pharmacological therapies (psychological therapies, meditation, physical exercise, healthy habits, etc.) is proposed. The aim of this review was to review the existing scientific evidence on the effect of multicomponent programs with non-pharmacological therapies in people with chronic non-oncologic pain. To this end, a search for scientific articles was carried out in three databases (PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO) and 17 articles were selected, following the PRISMA recommendations. The patients who participated in these programs were mostly women, aged 18 to 80years, working or on sick leave due to pain, with secondary education or less and married. The most frequent pain was musculoskeletal, mainly low back pain. All the articles studied the effectiveness of two or more therapies, highlighting psychological therapies, physical exercise and education. Positive results were obtained in the reduction of different variables such as pain, pain catastrophizing, anxiety and depression, in addition to improving functionality and quality of life. It has also been shown that patients' prior expectations regarding the intervention influence its effectiveness. Although throughout the review there was great heterogeneity in the interventions, in the evaluation methods and in the results themselves, it can be concluded that multicomponent programs show positive results in the management of chronic pain, and should therefore be incorporated as a routine therapeutic treatment.

[Impact of a multicomponent program with nonpharmacological therapies for patients with chronic pain]. / Impacto de un programa multicomponente con terapias no farmacológicas para pacientes con dolor crónico.

INTRODUCTION: 25.9% of Spanish people suffer from chronic pain. An integrated, interdisciplinary approach is recommended, with pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies, involving patients in their self-care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and impact on resources of a program with non-pharmacological therapies in the control of non-oncological chronic pain in the short and medium term. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Quasi-experimental before-after study, follow-up 3-6 months, measuring: pain, well-being, quality of life, self-esteem, resilience, anxiety/depression (validated scales); patient-reported outcomes of workshop impact on pain management, habits and mood; ED and office visits; drug consumption and employment status. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-two patients completed the program; 131 (92.3%) were women, age: 56.0. Decreased: pain (scale 0-10) (start: 6.0; end of workshop: 4.0; 3 months: 5.0); anxiety (12.9; 10.4; 8.8) and depression (12.3; 7.23; 6.47) (scales 0-21). They increased: well-being (scale 0-10) (4.0; 6.0; 4.0); quality of life (scale 0-1) (0.418; 0.580; 0.536); health status (scale 0-100) (47.5; 60.0; 60.0); self-esteem (scale 9-36) (24.1; 27.5; 26.7); resilience (scale 6-30) (14.8; 17.4; 18.6). Patient-reported outcomes were performed by 136 patients at the end of the workshop and 79 at 3 months: pain decreased (end of program: 104, 76.5%; 3 months: 66, 83.5%); medication decreased (96, 76.2%; 60, 78.9%); habits improved (112, 88.2%; 69, 90.8%). Forty patients (37.4%) reduced visits to the emergency room, 40 (37.4%) reduced scheduled visits. Overall satisfaction: 9.8 out of 10. CONCLUSIONS: Patients learn to mitigate their pain, participate in their self-care and improve their quality of life, self-esteem and emotional state. The effects remained for 3-6 months.

Efectividad de una intervención multimodal para la mejora de la atención al dolor crónico / Effectiveness of a multimodal intervention for improving chronic pain care

Fundamentos: La prevalencia de dolor crónico en España es del 17% y causa sufrimiento y pérdida significativa de la calidad de vida. Las terapiasno deben enfocarse sólo a la reducción del dolor, sino que es necesario mejorar la función y la calidad de vida. Actualmente, se apuesta por combinarfármacos y otras terapias como la relajación, meditación, terapia cognitivo conductual, ejercicios dirigidos, estilos de vida saludable y técnicas de aumentode la autoestima y motivación para el cambio. Estas terapias pueden ser utilizadas como parte de un abordaje multimodal, formando parte de programaso talleres multicomponente. En este trabajo nos planteamos evaluar la efectividad de un taller desarrollado en el Hospital San Juan de Dios del Aljarafe, queintegraba distintas terapias no farmacológicas en el control del dolor crónico no oncológico y analizar las percepciones de los pacientes sobre las técnicasaplicadas y cómo afectaban al dolor y a sus estilos de vida. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio intragrupo antes-después (inicio-final del taller), comparando dolor, bienestar, consumo de fármacos, calidad de vida yautoestima. Se realizaron encuestas para profundizar en aspectos más cualitativos e identificar mejoras. El taller consistió en una acción psicoeducativa yde entrenamiento para el control mental del dolor y las emociones, fundamentada en la participación activa del paciente en el manejo de su enfermedad,promoviendo su autocuidado y autoestima, y persiguiendo mejorar el bienestar y calidad de vida. Constó de cinco sesiones de tres horas (una por semana);de carácter grupal, interactivo y práctico. El análisis estadístico se realizó con SPSS vs.27.0. Para comparar medidas relacionadas (antes-después) se realizaron las pruebas T de Student para muestras apareadas y test de Wilcoxon, y para comparar grupos independientes se usó la T de Student y U de MannWhitney; para las variables cualitativas se empleó Chi-Cuadrado y test de Fisher...(AU)

Background: The prevalence of chronic pain in Spain is 17%, which causes suffering and significant loss of quality of life. Therapies should not focusonly on pain reduction, to improve function and quality of life are necessary. Currently, it is committed to combining drugs and other therapies such asrelaxation, meditation, cognitive behavioral therapy, targeted exercises, healthy lifestyles and techniques to increase self-esteem and motivation for change. These therapies can be used as part of a multimodal approach, forming part of multicomponent programs or workshops. In this paper we proposed toevaluate the effectiveness of a workshop developed from the Hospital San Juan de Dios del Ajarafe, that integrated different non-pharmacological therapiesin the control of chronic non-oncologic pain and to analyze patients’ perceptions of the techniques applied and how they affected pain and lifestyles. Methods: An intragroup before-after study (beginning-end of the workshop) was carried out, comparing pain, well-being, drug use, quality of life, andself-esteem. Surveys were conducted to deepen more qualitative aspects and identify improvements. The workshop consisted of psychoeducational action andtraining for the mental control of pain and emotions, based on the active participation of the patient in the management of his disease, promoting self-care andself-esteem, and aiming to improve well-being and quality of life. It consisted of 5 sessions of 3 hours (1 per week); of a group, interactive and practical nature.Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS vs.27.0. To compare related measures (before-after) we used Student’s T tests for paired samples and Wilcoxon’s testand to compare independent groups, Student’s T and Mann Whitney’s U; for the qualitative variables, we used Chi-Square and Fisher’s test...(AU)

Usage of immersive virtual reality as a relaxation method in an intensive care unit.

INTRODUCTION: The usage of immersive virtual reality (iVR) in the context of an intensive care unit (ICU) is scarce. Our objective was to assess the feasibility of the usage of iVR in critical patients with or without mechanical ventilation (MV) and to determine the anxiety degree before and after each session. METHODS: Analytical, descriptive, prospective, and cross-sectional research. Pilot test with 20 patients from a polyvalent ICU of a tertiary hospital. Adult patients were included, either connected or not to MV, watchful and calmed (RASS -1/+1) and without delirium (negative CAM-ICU). Oculus Go (Facebook Technologies, LLC) iVR glasses were the model used. The relaxation strategy consisted in the visualization of an experience of 15 min with scenes related to nature and fantasy, relaxing music with a plot. The sessions were individual, with the patient monitored in a fowler position or seated. The anxiety degree before and after each session was evaluated following a reduced version of the Spanish "Cuestionario de Ansiedad Estado-Rasgo (STAI-e)" and they were analysed using T samples coupled (statistical significance when p-value was <0.05). RESULTS: Incorporation of 20 patients with an average age of 63.9 years old (60% men). A total of 34 sessions of iVR were conducted. 32% patients mechanically ventilated, 32% high-flow oxygen therapy, 36% other breathing supports. 80% of the sessions were completed without serious side effects. A significant decrease in the anxiety degree was observed after each iVR session: first session mean change -2.68 (SD = 2.75), p = 0.000; second session mean change -1.86 (SD = 1.57), p = 0.021; third session mean change -1.67 (SD = 1.63), p = 0.054. CONCLUSION: The usage of iVR in the context of an ICU is feasible, even with patients mechanically ventilated. iVR reduces the anxiety degree in the critic patient, which suggests that "digital therapies" can be effective to improve the emotional state during their stay in the ICU.

Análisis del efecto a largo plazo de un programa de estimulación cognitiva en mayores con deterioro cognitivo leve en Atención Primaria: ensayo controlado aleatorizado / Long-term effect analysis of a cognitive stimulation program in mild cognitive impairment elderly in Primary Care: A randomized controlled trial

Objetivo: Aportar evidencias de la eficacia de una intervención comunitaria en salud a través de un programa de estimulación cognitiva (PEC) implementada con el paso del tiempo en mayores con deterioro cognitivo leve en la comunidad. Diseño: Seguimiento de un ensayo controlado aleatorizado (normas grupo CONSORT). Emplazamiento: Centro de salud San José Norte-Centro y Fundación La Caridad (Zaragoza). Participantes: Veintinueve personas ≥65 años, con 24-27 puntos en el MEC-35 que completaron el ensayo a los 48 meses, 15 aleatorizados en el grupo intervención y 14 en el grupo control. Intervenciones: Se realizaron 10 sesiones, 45min/semana, durante 10 semanas, con el cuaderno rojo de activación mental que ejercita: memoria, orientación, lenguaje, praxis, gnosis, cálculo, percepción, razonamiento lógico, atención y funciones ejecutivas. Mediciones principales: MEC-35, Set-test, Barthel, Lawton-Brody, subescala de ansiedad Goldberg y Yesavage abreviado (GDS-15). Resultados: Analizando los incrementos sobre el nivel basal para MEC-35, el grupo intervención obtiene, de media: postintervención 3,14 puntos, a los 6 meses 3,76 puntos y a los 12 meses 2,26 puntos más que el grupo control, siendo estos incrementos estadísticamente significativos. A los 48 meses el grupo intervención sigue obteniendo 2 puntos más que el control, sin ser significativos. La intervención no mejoró el desempeño en fluidez verbal, actividades de la vida diaria ni estado de ánimo. Conclusiones:Nuestro PEC podría ser eficaz en la mejora de la cognición general, medida con el MEC-35, en postintervención, a los 6, 12 y 48 meses. No se evidencian mejoras en fluidez verbal, actividades de la vida diaria ni estado de ánimo.(AU)

Objective: To provide evidence about the efficacy of a community health intervention through a cognitive stimulation program at long term in older people with mild cognitive impairment. Design: Randomized controlled trial (CONSORT group norms). Location: San José Norte-Centro Primary Care Center and La Caridad Foundation (Zaragoza, Spain). Participants: Twenty-nine people over 65 years old with a 24-27 MEC score that completed 48 months follow up. They were randomized between the intervention group (15) and the control group (14). Interventions: The intervention was applied in 10 sessions of 45min for 10 weeks using the red notebook tool for mental activation that works memory, orientation, language, praxis, gnosis, calculation, perception, logical reasoning, attention and executive functions. Main measurements: The main outcome variables were MEC-35, Set-test, Barthel index, Lawton-Brody scale, Goldberg anxiety scale and Yesavage geriatric depression scale short form. Results: Increases of the main result variable over the baseline level of MEC-35 were analyzed. On average, the intervention group obtained higher scores than control: 3.14 points post intervention, 3.76 points after 6 months and 2.26 points more than control group after 12 months. All the differences were statistically significant. After 48 months the intervention group obtained 2 points more than control group. The intervention did not improve verbal fluency, activity daily living and mood. Conclusions: Our cognitive stimulation program seems to improve cognitive performance, measured with the variable MEC-35 at post intervention, 6, 12 and 48 months. There is no evidence of improvement in verbal fluency, activity daily livings and mood.(AU)

[Long-term effect analysis of a cognitive stimulation program in mild cognitive impairment elderly in Primary Care: A randomized controlled trial]. / Análisis del efecto a largo plazo de un programa de estimulación cognitiva en mayores con deterioro cognitivo leve en Atención Primaria: ensayo controlado aleatorizado.

OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence about the efficacy of a community health intervention through a cognitive stimulation program at long term in older people with mild cognitive impairment. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial (CONSORT group norms). LOCATION: San José Norte-Centro Primary Care Center and La Caridad Foundation (Zaragoza, Spain). PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-nine people over 65 years old with a 24-27 MEC score that completed 48 months follow up. They were randomized between the intervention group (15) and the control group (14). INTERVENTIONS: The intervention was applied in 10 sessions of 45min for 10 weeks using the red notebook tool for mental activation that works memory, orientation, language, praxis, gnosis, calculation, perception, logical reasoning, attention and executive functions. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome variables were MEC-35, Set-test, Barthel index, Lawton-Brody scale, Goldberg anxiety scale and Yesavage geriatric depression scale short form. RESULTS: Increases of the main result variable over the baseline level of MEC-35 were analyzed. On average, the intervention group obtained higher scores than control: 3.14 points post intervention, 3.76 points after 6 months and 2.26 points more than control group after 12 months. All the differences were statistically significant. After 48 months the intervention group obtained 2 points more than control group. The intervention did not improve verbal fluency, activity daily living and mood. CONCLUSIONS: Our cognitive stimulation program seems to improve cognitive performance, measured with the variable MEC-35 at post intervention, 6, 12 and 48 months. There is no evidence of improvement in verbal fluency, activity daily livings and mood. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03831061.

[Analysis of the effect of a program of cognitive stimulation in elderly people with normal aging in primary care: Randomized clinical trial]. / Análisis del efecto de un programa de estimulación cognitiva en personas con envejecimiento normal en Atención Primaria: ensayo clínico aleatorizado.

OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence of the effectiveness of a community health intervention, that includes a cognitive stimulation program, to prevent the deterioration of cognitive abilities in our population of elderly people with normal cognition that are living in the community. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial (CONSORT group norms) LOCATION: San José Norte-Centro Health Center and La Caridad Foundation (Zaragoza, Spain). PARTICIPANTS: 201 people aged 65 or older, with a MEC score of at least 28 points, which were randomized between the Intervention group (101) and the Control group (100). INTERVENTION: The intervention was applied in 10 sessions of 45minutes, one per week. It used materials designed by one of the authors, which addressed the following areas: memory, orientation, language, praxis, gnosis, calculation, perception, logical reasoning, attention-concentration and programming. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome variables were MEC, Set-Test, Barthel and Lawton-Brody. RESULTS: Increases of the main result variables over their baseline level were analized. For MEC variable, the Intervention group obtained, on average, 1.58 points more than the Control group in the evaluation performed immediately after the intervention. After 6months, the improvement was 1.51 points and after a year, it was of 2.04 points. All these differences were statistically significant. For Set-Test, Barthel and Lawton-Brody variables, no statistically significant differences were observed between Intervention group and Control group. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive stimulation with our program is effective to maintain or improve cognitive performance, measured with the variable MEC, our population of elderly people with normal cognition that are living in the community. There is no evidence that this improvement is transferred to the activities of daily life measured with Barthel and Lawton-Brody variables.

[Non-pharmacological treatment of cognitive impairment]. / Tratamiento no farmacológico del deterioro cognitivo.

This article reviews the effect of non-pharmacological therapies in persons with cognitive impairment, especially treatments aimed at brain stimulation and functional maintenance, since both pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies affecting the cognitive and psychoaffective domains are reviewed in another article in this supplement. The article also discusses the close and reciprocal relationship between cognitive impairment, diet and nutritional status and describes the main nutritional risk factors and protective factors in cognitive decline.

A pilot study of a new method of cognitive stimulation using abacus arithmetic in healthy and cognitively impaired elderly subjects. / Estudio piloto de un nuevo método de estimulación aritmética empleando el ábaco en ancianos sanos y con trastorno cognitivo.

BACKGROUND: This study explores the applicability of a cognitive stimulation method based on abacus arithmetic in elderly people with and without cognitive impairment. METHODS: This observational and prospective pilot study was performed in 2 hospitals. The study assessed the applicability of a programme of arithmetic training developed for use in the elderly population. The primary endpoint was an evaluation of the stimulation programme, in terms of usability, satisfaction, and participation, in healthy elderly controls and elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer disease. Secondary endpoints were family satisfaction, caregiver burden, and the behaviour and cognition of patients. RESULTS: Usability, satisfaction, and degree of participation were high. The Mini-Mental State Examination showed significant changes (23.1±4.8 before the intervention vs 24.9±4.2 afterwards, P=.002); there were no changes on the Trail Making Test parts A and B, Yesavage Geriatric Depression scale, and Zarit caregiver burden scale. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that cognitive stimulation with abacus arithmetic may be used in elderly people with and without cognitive impairment. Further studies will be needed to evaluate the efficacy of this kind of programmes.

Cognitive intervention therapy as treatment for behaviour disorders in Alzheimer disease: evidence on efficacy and neurobiological correlations.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of behavioural and psychological symptoms (BPS) is very high among patients with Alzheimer disease (AD); more than 90% of AD patients will present such symptoms during the course of the disease. These symptoms result in poorer quality of life for both patients and caregivers and increased healthcare costs. BPS are the main factors involved in increases to the caregiver burden, and they often precipitate the admission of patients to residential care centres. DEVELOPMENT: Current consensus holds that intervention models combining pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments are the most effective for AD patients. Several studies have shown cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine combined with cognitive intervention therapy (CIT) to be effective for improving patients' cognitive function and functional capacity for undertaking daily life activities. However, the efficacy of CIT as a treatment for BPS has not yet been clearly established, which limits its use for this purpose in clinical practice. The objective of this review is to gather available evidence on the efficacy of cognitive intervention therapy (CIT) on BPS in patients with AD. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review suggest that CIT may have a beneficial effect on BPS in patients with AD and should therefore be considered a treatment option for patients with AD and BPS.

Medidas no farmacológicas para el alivio del dolor / Non pharmacologic measures for relief of pain

El objetivo de esta revisión es discutir algunos aspectos de las terapias no farmacológicas para aliviar el dolor y el sufrimiento las cuales no han recibido la atención que merecen por parte del personal de la salud. Se incluyen elementos de la terapia física como el calor, el frío, el ejercicio, la neuroestimulación y la acupuntura; la terapia cognoscitiva y conductual con métodos como la educación, la retroalimentación, la relajación, la musicoterapia, la hipnosis, la distracción, la sustitución de pensamientos e imágenes y la terapia grupal y familiar. Se discuten aspectos de la asistencia espiritual y el tacto humanizado. Todo esto con el fin de lograr un acercamiento humanizado al hombre que sufre.

In this review the author discusses some aspectsof non-pharmacologic therapies for relief of painand suffering; both physical and psychologicalapproaches are included; the former include heatand cold applicatio", exercises, neurostimulationand acupuncture; the latter are education,biofeedback, relaxation, musictherapy, hypnosis,thought sustitution, images and group and familytherapy. Aiso discussed are spiritual assistanceand humanized touch. The goal of theseapproaches is to obtain proximity with the sufferinghuman being