The comparative effect of teriparatide and denosumab on activins, follistatins and inhibins in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

The activins-follistatins-inhibins (AFI) hormonal system affects bone metabolism. Treatments that alter bone metabolism may also alter the AFI molecules. In this non-randomized, open-label, head-to-head comparative study, circulating levels of the AFI system were evaluated in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated for 12 months with either teriparatide (n = 23) or denosumab (n = 22). Τeriparatide treatment increased activin B (p = 0.01) and activin AB (p = 0.004) and the ratios activin A/follistatin (p = 0.006), activin B/follistatin (p = 0.007), activin AB/follistatin (p < 0.001) and activin AB/FSTL3 (p = 0.034). The significant p for trend in group*time interactions of activins B and AB and of the ratio activin AB/FSTL3 remained robust after adjustment for body mass index (BMI) and lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS BMD) but it was lost for activin B after adjustment for previous antiresorptive treatment. The effect of teriparatide on BMD was attenuated when it was adjusted for baseline activins levels or their 12-month changes. No changes were observed after denosumab treatment. In conclusion, activins B and AB, as well as the ratios of all activins to follistatin and of activin AB to FSTL3 increased with teriparatide treatment, possibly in a compensatory manner. Future studies are needed to study the potentially important role activins may play in bone biology and any associations with the effect of teriparatide on BMD.

Bone and the muscle, comprise two tissues that are considered to interact with each other, not only through mechanical but also through endocrine signals. Several components of the activins-follistatins-inhibins (AFI) hormonal system have been shown to be secreted by the muscle and affect the bone possibly contributing to this interplay. We have previously investigated levels of the AFI molecules in case­control studies and reported differences between osteoporotic versus osteopenic versus postmenopausal and premenopausal women with normal bone mineral density (BMD). In this 12-month, non-randomized, open-labeled, head-to-head comparative study, we prospectively compared the effect of antiosteoporotic agents with opposite effect on bone metabolism, i.e., teriparatide versus denosumab, on the circulating concentrations of all known molecules of the AFI system in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. We observed increases of activins after teriparatide treatment, but no effect after denosumab treatment on any of the AFI molecules studied. Since activins are mainly acting in an autocrine way and since activin B and AB have not been extensively studied, further studies in the basic research, preclinical and clinical research fields are required to expand these observations and fully elucidate physiology and any therapeutic potential.

Effects of differences in dose and frequency of teriparatide on bone structure in Proximal Femur. - Analysis by DXA-based 3D-modeling (3D-SHAPER Software) -TRIPLE-BONE study (The effects of TeRIParatide preparation on bone mineraL density increase and BONE structure).

Trends toward more favorable improvement of the cortical bone parameters by once-weekly (56.5 µg once a week) and twice-weekly teriparatide (28.2 µg twice a week), and that of the trabecular bone parameters by once-daily (1/D) teriparatide (20 µg/day once a day) were shown. PURPOSE: To examine the effects of differences in the amount of teriparatide (TPTD) per administration and its dosing frequency on the bone structure in the proximal femur by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based 3D-modeling (3D-SHAPER software). METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study. Patients aged 50 years or older with primary osteoporosis who continuously received once-/twice-weekly (1・2/W, n = 60) or 1/D TPTD (n = 14) administration for at least one year were included in the study. Measurement regions included the femoral neck (FN), trochanter (TR), femoral shaft (FS), and total proximal hip (TH). Concurrently, the bone mineral density (BMD) and Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) were measured. RESULTS: The cross-sectional area, cross-sectional moment of inertia, and section modulus in the FS were significantly improved in the 1・2/W TPTD group, as compared to the 1/D TPTD group. However, significant improvement of the cortical thickness and buckling ratio in the FN was observed in the 1/D TPTD group, as compared to the 1・2/W TPTD group. Trabecular BMD values in the FS and TH were significantly increased in the 1/D TPTD group, as compared to the 1・2/W TPTD group, while the cortical BMD values in the TR, FS, and TH were significantly increased in the 1・2/W TPTD group, as compared to the 1/D TPTD group. CONCLUSION: Trends toward more favorable improvement of the cortical bone by 1・2/W TPTD and that of the trabecular bones by 1/D TPTD were observed.

Change in spinal bone mineral density as estimated by Hounsfield units following osteoporosis treatment with romosozumab, teriparatide, denosumab, and alendronate: an analysis of 318 patients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of osteoporosis medications on opportunistic CT-based Hounsfield units (HU). METHODS: Spine and nonspine surgery patients were retrospectively identified who had been treated with romosozumab for 3 to 12 months, teriparatide for 3 to 12 months, teriparatide for > 12 months, denosumab for > 12 months, or alendronate for > 12 months. HU were measured in the L1-4 vertebral bodies. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the mean change in HU among the five treatment regimens. RESULTS: In total, 318 patients (70% women) were included, with a mean age of 69 years and mean BMI of 27 kg/m2. There was a significant difference in mean HU improvement (p < 0.001) following treatment with romosozumab for 3 to 12 months (n = 32), teriparatide for 3 to 12 months (n = 30), teriparatide for > 12 months (n = 44), denosumab for > 12 months (n = 123), and alendronate for > 12 months (n = 100). Treatment with romosozumab for a mean of 10.5 months significantly increased the mean HU by 26%, from a baseline of 85 to 107 (p = 0.012). Patients treated with teriparatide for > 12 months (mean 23 months) experienced a mean HU improvement of 25%, from 106 to 132 (p = 0.039). Compared with the mean baseline HU, there was no significant difference after treatment with teriparatide for 3 to 12 months (110 to 119, p = 0.48), denosumab for > 12 months (105 to 107, p = 0.68), or alendronate for > 12 months (111 to 113, p = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with romosozumab for a mean of 10.5 months and teriparatide for a mean of 23 months experienced improved spinal bone mineral density as estimated by CT-based opportunistic HU. Given the shorter duration of effective treatment, romosozumab may be the preferred medication for optimization of osteoporotic patients in preparation for elective spine fusion surgery.

Effects of daily teriparatide, weekly high-dose teriparatide, or bisphosphonate on cortical and trabecular bone of vertebra and proximal femur in postmenopausal women with fragility fracture: Sub-analysis by quantitative computed tomography from the TERABIT study.

PURPOSE: The effects of daily teriparatide (D-PTH, 20 µg/day), weekly high-dose teriparatide (W-PTH, 56.5 µg/week), or bisphosphonate (BP) on the vertebra and proximal femur were investigated using quantitative computed tomography (QCT). METHODS: A total of 131 postmenopausal women with a history of fragility fractures were randomized to receive D-PTH, W-PTH, or bisphosphonate (oral alendronate or risedronate). QCT were evaluated at baseline and after 18 months of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 86 participants were evaluated by QCT (Spine: D-PTH: 25, W-PTH: 21, BP: 29. Hip: PTH: 22, W-PTH: 21, BP: 32. Dropout rate: 30.5 %). QCT of the vertebra showed that D-PTH, W-PTH, and BP increased total vBMD (+34.8 %, +18.2 %, +11.1 %), trabecular vBMD (+50.8 %, +20.8 %, +12.2 %), and marginal vBMD (+20.0 %, +14.0 %, +11.5 %). The increase in trabecular vBMD was greater in the D-PTH group than in the W-PTH and BP groups. QCT of the proximal femur showed that D-PTH, W-PTH, and BP increased total vBMD (+2.8 %, +3.6 %, +3.2 %) and trabecular vBMD (+7.7 %, +5.1 %, +3.4 %), while only W-PTH and BP significantly increased cortical vBMD (-0.1 %, +1.5 %, +1.6 %). Although there was no significant increase in cortical vBMD in the D-PTH group, cortical bone volume (BV) increased in all three treatment groups (+2.1 %, +3.6 %, +3.1 %). CONCLUSIONS: D-PTH had a strong effect on trabecular bone of vertebra. Although D-PTH did not increase cortical BMD of proximal femur, it increased cortical BV. W-PTH had a moderate effect on trabecular bone of vertebra, while it increased both cortical BMD and BV of proximal femur. Although BP had a limited effect on trabecular bone of vertebra compared to teriparatide, it increased both cortical BMD and BV of proximal femur.

Two-Year Outcomes of Daily and Twice-Weekly Teriparatide Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Severe Osteoporosis: A Randomized Non-Blinded Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The long-term effects of daily teriparatide (D-TPTD) and twice-weekly TPTD (W-TPTD) injections are compared among postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis. METHODS: A total of 102 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups for the administration of either D-TPTD or W-TPTD. Treatment efficacy was measured as the percentage change in bone mineral density (ΔBMD) from baseline in the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck. The findings were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: At 24 months after treatment, the persistence rates and medication possession ratios in the D-TPTD and W-TPTD groups were 68.6% and 56.9%, and 87.8% and 92.0%, respectively. The ΔBMD in the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck were 15.6%±10.2%, 5.3%± 6.3%, and 5.5%±6.2%, respectively, in the D-TPTD group; and 9.5%±7.9%, 2.3%±6.2%, and 3.1%±7.4%, respectively, in the W-TPTD group following 24 months of treatment. The ΔBMD of the lumbar spine (p=0.008) at 24 months and total hip (p=0.024) at 18 months differed significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: D-TPTD administration resulted in a significantly higher BMD in the lumbar spine and total hip, supporting this therapeutic regimen for postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis.

The Combined Therapy of Teriparatide and Raloxifene Improves Osseointegration of Dental Implants in the Osteoporotic Rabbit Model.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of combined therapy of teriparatide and raloxifene on the osseointegration of titanium dental implants in a rabbit model of osteoporotic bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty female rabbits were randomly divided into six groups. The sham ovariectomy group (control) consisted of animals that received no medication. Animals in the ovariectomy group (OVX) underwent ovariectomy and received no medication. The combined group consisted of ovariectomized animals that received combined teriparatide (10 mg/kg) for 12 weeks and raloxifene (10 mg/kg) for 12 weeks. The sequential group (SEQ) consisted of ovariectomized animals that received teriparatide (10 mg/kg) for the first 6 weeks and raloxifene therapy (10 mg/kg) for the following 6 weeks sequentially. The parathormone (PTH) and raloxifene (RAL) groups consisted of ovariectomized animals that received only teriparatide (10 mg/kg) for 12 weeks or raloxifene (10 mg/kg) for 12 weeks, respectively. Dental implants (Bilimplant) were placed in the proximal metaphysis of both tibias in all rabbits. Histomorphometric and microCT studies were performed on the specimens obtained from the right tibia bone. Removal torque (RTQ) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) tests were performed on the specimens obtained from the left tibia bone. The results were compared and evaluated statistically. RESULTS: RTQ analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between the mean values of the combined group (93.01 ± 27.19 Ncm) and the OVX group (49.6 ± 12.5 Ncm) (P = .015). The highest mean T0 (implantation day) value was obtained in the control group (67.1 ± 3.4 Ncm), and the lowest mean value was obtained in the OVX group (61.4 ± 3.8 Ncm). The highest T1 mean (3 months after implantation) was obtained by the combined group (76.6 ± 3.8 Ncm), and the lowest mean was obtained by the OVX group (68.9 ± 6.2 Ncm). Histomorphometric analyses showed that the mean percentage of bone-to-implant contact (BIC%) of the combined group (51.2%) was significantly higher than that of the OVX group (28.6%) (P =.006). In the microCT examinations, it was found that the mean BIC% value of the combined group (41.1%) was significantly higher than that of the OVX group (24.1%) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of the current study, combined therapy of teriparatide and raloxifene improves the BIC and osseointegration of titanium dental implants in osteoporotic bone compared with sequential or independent therapy with these agents.

Teriparatide Does not Have Beneficial Effects on Bone Healing in Complete Atypical Femur Fractures.

Teriparatide is an anabolic drug sometimes administered to patients who have atypical femoral fracture (AFF). However, whether teriparatide has beneficial effects on bone healing remains uncertain. The present study aimed to analyze the association between teriparatide and bone healing in complete AFF. A total of 59 consecutive cases (58 patients) who underwent intramedullary nailing for complete AFF were categorized based on postoperative use of teriparatide into the non-teriparatide (non-TPTD, n = 34) and teriparatide groups (TPTD, n = 25). Time-to-bone union was evaluated and compared between the two groups. Additionally, multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors affecting time-to-bone union. All participants were women, with a mean age of 77.6 years (range: 62-92). No significant difference in time-to-bone union was found between the non-TPTD and TPTD groups (5.5 months vs. 5.8 months, p = 0.359). Two patients in the non-TPTD group underwent reoperation (p = 0.503) due to failure caused by inadequate fixation, and both achieved bone healing after additional fixation with blocking screws. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the anterior gap of the fracture site postoperatively was a factor affecting time-to-bone union (p = 0.014). The beneficial effect of teriparatide on bone healing in complete AFF could not be confirmed. Additional randomized controlled trials are required. Nonetheless, appropriate techniques, including efforts to reduce the gap on the tensile side during the surgery, are important for reliable bone healing.

Bioequivalence of Recombinant Human Teriparatide Injection in Healthy Adult Female Subjects in the Fasting State.

A single-center, randomized, open, 2-period, self-crossover, single-dose trial was conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence of the test (T) and reference (R) preparations in healthy adult female subjects under fasting conditions. Seventy-six subjects were enrolled in the study, and subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups at a 1:1 ratio and were administered once per period, with a 4-day washout period. In each period, plasma drug concentrations, blood calcium changes, and antibodies were determined for pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity analysis, respectively, and adverse events were recorded for safety analysis. The 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios (T:R) of maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity were within the predefined bioequivalence criterion of 80%-125%, indicating bioequivalence between the T and R preparations under fasting conditions. Comparable serum calcium levels demonstrated pharmacodynamics similarity, and no differences were found in immunogenicity profiles. Additionally, the incidence of adverse reactions to the T preparation was 18.4% lower than that of the R preparation (31.6%). This study confirmed the bioequivalence of the T and R preparations under fasting conditions, along with comparable immunogenicity profiles and good safety.

Does Early Treatment With Teriparatide Prevent the Need for Surgical Intervention in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of early administration of Teriparatide in preventing the necessity of surgical intervention in individuals with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. METHODS: In a 24-month follow-up retrospective analysis, 191 OVCF patients from January 2016 to October 2020 were randomly assigned to Non teriparatide Group A (n = 104) or Group B teriparatide (n = 87). At baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years following treatment, demographic data and need of surgical intervention, VAS, ODI, union rates, and kyphosis development, were examined. RESULTS: Our study found that non-teriparatide group individuals had an 11.53% higher risk of non-union formation that required surgery. Only 8.63% of teriparatide group patients needed surgery. Both groups had significant VAS score reductions. Non-teriparatide group scores declined from 8.38 ± 0.74 to 3.15 ± 1.40, while teriparatide group scores decreased from 8.49 ± 0.73 to 1.11 ± 0.31. The 2-year follow-up ODI scores significantly decreased, with values of 25.02 ± 13.94 for non-teriparatide patients and 15.11 ± 2.17 for teriparatide patients. The kyphosis progression angles in the teriparatide group were considerably lower (4.97 ± 0.78°) compared to the other group (8.09 ± 1.25°). CONCLUSION: With increasing elderly populations, it is necessary to take measures to prevent surgical intervention in osteoporotic spinal compression fractures. Teriparatide can be employed as an early medication in the management of these fractures to avert non-union and the minimise the progression of kyphosis.

A crossover comparison of patient satisfaction with two teriparatide regimens: primary results of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial 06 (JOINT-06).

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare treatment satisfaction with two dosing regimens (two teriparatide [TPTD] self-injection systems) in osteoporosis patients at high risk of fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this open-label crossover randomized trial comparing self-injected once-daily (1/D)-TPTD with self-injected twice-weekly (2/W)-TPTD, three satisfaction variables were evaluated by questionnaire for 2 years. The primary endpoint was overall satisfaction and secondary endpoints were satisfaction with treatment effectiveness and with utility of the self-injection device. Changes in quality of life (QOL) assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension, pain assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS), and anthropometric parameters were also analyzed. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: The 1/D-TPTD and 2/W-TPTD groups consisted of 180 (75.9 ± 7.3 years) and 179 (age: 75.5 ± 6.9 years) patients, respectively. After 26 weeks of treatment, no significant between-group difference in the persistence rate (79.4% vs 72.6% in the 1/D-TPTD and 2/W-TPTD groups, respectively), distributions of overall satisfaction scores, and satisfaction with treatment (p > 0.05) were observed. However, several items of satisfaction with the utility of the injection device were significantly higher in the 2/W-TPTD group (p < 0.05). Statistical improvements from baseline values were observed in QOL and pain VAS in both groups (p < 0.05). No serious AEs were reported. CONCLUSION: The between-group similarity of overall treatment satisfaction and effectiveness scores and between-group difference in satisfaction with the utility of the self-injection device was useful information for real-world treatment of osteoporosis. Both medication regimens were well tolerated.

Looking Beyond the Usual Suspects: A Rare Case of Teriparatide-Induced Gynecomastia.

Teriparatide, an osteoanabolic agent, is a biosynthetic analogue of the 1-34 amino acids of human parathyroid hormone (PTH) used for the treatment of osteoporosis. It is typically well-tolerated; common side effects include headaches, arthralgias, nausea, and dizziness. In this report, we present a case of gynecomastia occurring shortly after initiating teriparatide therapy, associated with nipple sensitivity and breast tenderness. Secondary workup for various causes of gynecomastia was unremarkable. Finally, a decision was made to discontinue teriparatide due to the patient's concerns. The nipple sensitivity started improving shortly afterward, with complete resolution of gynecomastia 4 months later. Although this unusual side effect has been reported as a possibility in postmarketing studies, a chronological report on the occurrence of teriparatide-induced gynecomastia and its complete resolution after discontinuing teriparatide has not yet been published in the literature.

Teriparatide alone versus vertebroplasty on pain control and radiographic outcomes after osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

PURPOSE: To investigate efficacy of 3-month teriparatide(TPD) and compare this treatment with vertebroplasty in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes after osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). METHODS: This is a retrospective matched cohort study. Patients who received conservative treatment with at least 3-month TPD treatment for acute OVCF with at least 6 months follow-up were included. Each enrolled TPD case was matched with 2 vertebroplasty cases using age and gender. 30 TPD cases and 60 vertebroplasty cases were enrolled. Patient-reported pain scores were obtained at diagnosis and 1, 3, 6 months after diagnosis. Radiographic parameters including middle body height, posterior body height, wedge angle and kyphotic angle were measured at diagnosis and 6 months after diagnosis. Fracture non-union and subsequent vertebral fracture were evaluated. RESULTS: TPD treatment showed inferior pain relief to vertebroplasty group at 1 month, but did not show difference at 3 and 6 months after diagnosis. In TPD cases, progression of vertebral body collapse was noted in terms of middle body height and wedge angle at final follow up. Instead, both middle body height and wedge angle increased significantly after operation in the vertebroplasty group. Fracture non-union was confirmed via MRI and 4 TPD patients were diagnosed with non-union (4/30, 13.3%). Subsequent compression fracture within 6 months was significant higher in vertebroplasty group (12/60, 20%) than in TPD group (1/30, 3.3%). CONCLUSION: In acute OVCFs, 3-month TPD treatment alone showed comparable pain improvement and less subsequent spine fracture than vertebroplasty.

Romosozumab versus parathyroid hormone receptor agonists: which osteoanabolic to choose and when.

Osteoanabolic agents are used as a first line treatment in patients at high fracture risk. The PTH receptor 1 (PTH1R) agonists teriparatide (TPTD) and abaloparatide (ABL) increase bone formation, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone strength by activating PTH receptors on osteoblasts. Romosozumab (ROMO), a humanized monoclonal antibody against sclerostin, dramatically but transiently stimulates bone formation and persistently reduces bone resorption. Osteoanabolic agents increase BMD and bone strength while being more effective than antiresorptives in reducing fracture risk in postmenopausal women. However, direct comparisons of the antifracture benefits of osteoanabolic therapies are limited. In a direct comparison of TPTD and ABL, the latter resulted in greater BMD increases at the hip. While no differences in vertebral or non-vertebral fracture risk were observed between the two drugs, ABL led to a greater reduction of major osteoporotic fractures. Adverse event profiles were similar between the two agents except for hypercalcemia, which occurred more often with TPTD. No direct comparisons of fracture risk reduction between ROMO and the PTH1R agonists exist. Individual studies have shown greater increases in BMD and bone strength with ROMO compared to TPTD in treatment-naïve women and in women previously treated with bisphosphonates. Some safety aspects, such as a history of tumor precluding the use of PTH1R agonists, and a history of major cardiovascular events precluding the use of ROMO, should also be considered when choosing between these agents. Lastly, convenience of administration, reimbursement by national health systems and length of clinical experience may influence patient choice.

The Effects of Longer Use of Teriparatide on Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes after Spinal Fusion in Geriatric Patients.

Background: Teriparatide is an anabolic agent for osteoporosis and is believed to improve the bone healing process. Previous studies showed that teriparatide could enhance not only fracture healing but also spine fusion. It has been reported that use of teriparatide could promote the spine fusion process and decrease mechanical complications. However, there was no consensus regarding optimal treatment duration. The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes between short-duration and long-duration teriparatide treatment after lumbar fusion surgery in elderly patients. Materials and Methods: All consecutive patients older than 60 years who underwent 1-level lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative diseases between January 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Based on the duration of teriparatide treatment (daily subcutaneous injection of 20 µg teriparatide), patients were subdivided into two groups: a short-duration (SD) group (<6 months) and a long-duration (LD) group (≥6 months). Mechanical complications, such as screw loosening, cage subsidence, and adjacent vertebral fractures, were investigated. Postoperative 1-year union rate was also evaluated on computed tomography. Clinical outcomes were recorded using visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Between-group differences for these radiographic and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: Ninety-one patients were reviewed in this study, including sixty patients in the SD group and thirty-one patients in the LD group. Their mean age was 72.3 ± 6.2 years, and 79 patients were female. Mean T-score was -3.3 ± 0.8. Cage subsidence (6.7% vs. 3.2%), screw loosening (28.3% vs. 35.5%), and adjacent vertebral fracture (6.7% vs. 9.7%) were not significantly different between the SD and LD groups. Union rate at 1-year postoperative was 65.0% in the SD group and 87.1% in the LD group (p = 0.028). Both groups showed improvement in VAS and ODI after surgery. However, the differences of VAS from preoperative to 6 months and 1 year postoperative were significantly higher in the LD group. Conclusions: Longer teriparatide treatment after lumbar fusion surgery resulted in a higher union rate at 1-year postoperative than the shorter treatment. Also, it could be more beneficial for clinical outcomes.

Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Anabolic Agents and Bisphosphonates in the Patients With Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the clinical efficacy of anabolic agents compared with bisphosphonates (BPs) for the incidence of new osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) and fracture healing of OVF in the patients with OVF via meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for published RCTs till December 2022. The RCTs that recruited participants with osteoporosis at high-/very high-risk of fracture (a history of osteoporotic vertebral or hip fracture) or fresh OVF were included in this study. We assessed the risk of bias on every included RCTs, estimated relative risk (RR) for the incidence of new OVF and fracture healing of OVF, and overall certainty of evidence. Meta-analyses were performed by Cochrane review manager (RevMan) ver. 5.3. Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 and GRADEpro/GDT were applied for evaluating methodological quality and overall certainty of evidence, respectively. RESULTS: Five hundred eighteen studies were screened, and finally 6 eligible RCTs were included in the analysis. In the patients with prevalent OVF, anabolic agents significantly reduced the incidence of new OVF (teriparatide and romosozumab vs. alendronate and risedronate [RR, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.71; p < 0.00001; high-certainty of evidence]; teriparatide vs. risedronate [RR, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.68; p < 0.0001; high-certainty of evidence]). However, there was no evidence of teriparatide compared to alendronate in fracture healing of OVF (RR, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.60; p = 0.12; low-certainty of evidence). CONCLUSION: In the patients with prevalent OVF, anabolic agents showed a significant superiority for preventing new OVF than BPs, with no significant evidence for promoting fracture healing of OVF. However, considering small number of RCTs in this study, additional studies with large-scale data are required to obtain more robust evidences.

Gprc5a is a novel parathyroid hormone-inducible gene and negatively regulates osteoblast proliferation and differentiation.

Teriparatide is a peptide derived from a parathyroid hormone (PTH) and an osteoporosis therapeutic drug with potent bone formation-promoting activity. To identify novel druggable genes that act downstream of PTH signaling and are potentially involved in bone formation, we screened PTH target genes in mouse osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells. Here we show that Gprc5a, encoding an orphan G protein-coupled receptor, is a novel PTH-inducible gene and negatively regulates osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. PTH treatment induced Gprc5a expression in MC3T3-E1 cells, rat osteosarcoma ROS17/2.8 cells, and mouse femurs. Induction of Gprc5a expression by PTH occurred in the absence of protein synthesis and was mediated primarily via the cAMP pathway, suggesting that Gprc5a is a direct target of PTH signaling. Interestingly, Gprc5a expression was induced additively by co-treatment with PTH and 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (calcitriol), or retinoic acid in MC3T3-E1 cells. Reporter analysis of a 1 kb fragment of human GPRC5A promoter revealed that the promoter fragment showed responsiveness to PTH via the cAMP response element, suggesting that GPRC5A is also a PTH-inducible gene in humans. Gprc5a knockdown promoted cell viability and proliferation, as demonstrated by MTT and BrdU assays. Gprc5a knockdown also promoted osteoblast differentiation, as indicated by gene expression analysis and mineralization assay. Mechanistic studies showed that Gprc5a interacted with BMPR1A and suppressed BMP signaling induced by BMP-2 and constitutively active BMP receptors, ALK2 (ACVR1) Q207D and ALK3 (BMPR1A) Q233D. Thus, our results suggest that Gprc5a is a novel gene induced by PTH that acts in an inhibitory manner on both cell proliferation and osteoblast differentiation and is a candidate for drug targets for osteoporosis.

Teriparatide: an innovative and promising strategy for protecting the blood-spinal cord barrier following spinal cord injury.

The blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) is disrupted within minutes of spinal cord injury, leading to increased permeability and secondary spinal cord injury, resulting in more severe neurological damage. The preservation of blood-spinal cord barrier following spinal cord injury plays a crucial role in determining the prognosis. Teriparatide, widely used in clinical treatment for osteoporosis and promoting fracture healing, has been found in our previous study to have the effect of inhibiting the expression of MMP9 and alleviating blood-brain barrier disruption after ischemic stroke, thereby improving neurological damage symptoms. However, there are limited research on whether it has the potential to improve the prognosis of spinal cord injury. This article summarizes the main pathological mechanisms of blood-spinal cord barrier disruption after spinal cord injury and its relationship with Teriparatide, and explores the therapeutic potential of Teriparatide in improving the prognosis of spinal cord injury by reducing blood-spinal cord barrier disruption.