Correlation between urine cytology results on the day after overnight continuous saline irrigation following transurethral resection of bladder tumor and bladder tumor recurrence.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between urine cytology results after overnight continuous saline irrigation (OCSI) following transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and bladder tumor recurrence in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with NMIBC between 2016 and 2020 after undergoing TURBT at our hospital. All patients received OCSI following TURBT and had urine cytology test at postoperative 1 day. Urine cytology was classified into three groups: Negative, low-grade urothelial neoplasm (LGUN)+atypical urothelial cells (AUC), and suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (SHGUC)+high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) in each group was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients were included in this study. Based on urine cytology group (after OCSI), RFS did not reach the median value in the Negative group. In the LGUN+AUC group, the median RFS was 615.00 days. In the SHGUC+HGUC group, the median RFS was 377.00 days. In survival analysis, the Negative group had a longer RFS than the SHGUC+HGUC group (p=0.013). However, Cox regression analysis showed that SHGUC+HGUC was not an independent prognostic factor for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Urine cytology results after OCSI following TURBT in NMIBC were associated with bladder tumor recurrence. Specifically, SHGUC or HGUC in urine cytology after OCSI showed earlier recurrence than negative cases. However, further research is needed to accurately determine whether it is an independent prognostic factor.

A phase 2 pilot study of water irrigation after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (WATIP) demonstrating safety, feasibility and activity.

PURPOSE: Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) can recur, partly due to seeding of free tumour cells after transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT). Intravesical chemotherapy post-TURBT can reduce the risk but is used infrequently and inconsistently due to cost, complexity and side effects. The objective of this study was to prospectively assess continuous bladder irrigation using water, which may be a safer and easier alternative with comparable effectiveness. METHODS: WATIP was a prospective, single-arm phase 2 study of water irrigation during and for at least 3 h after TURBT for bladder tumours noted on imaging or flexible cystoscopy. Participants were assessed clinically for adverse effects and with blood tests within 24 h for sodium, haemoglobin and lactate dehydrogenase. The primary endpoints were safety (defined as < 10% adverse events of CTCAE grade ≥ 3), and feasibility (defined as the intervention being delivered as planned in > 90% of cases) and secondary endpoint was recurrence-free rates (RFR). RESULTS: Water irrigation was delivered as planned in 29 (97%) of 30 participants (median age 67 years, 25 (83%) males). The only adverse event (grade 2) was clot retention in one (3.3%) participant. Water irrigation significantly reduced urothelial cell counts in catheter effluent over time, unlike saline irrigation which did not. RFR was 56.2% (9/16 participants with low-risk NMIBC) at first cystoscopy (median interval 108 days) and 62.5% (5/8 evaluable low-risk NMIBC) at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Water irrigation during and after TURBT is feasible and safe. Prospective assessment of its effect on NMIBC recurrence compared to post-TURBT intravesical chemotherapy is needed before recommending its use in routine clinical practice. Trial registration ANZCTR registration ID ACTRN12619000517178 on 1 April 2019.

Massive continuous irrigation (MCI) and endoscopic debridement as an alternative treatment strategy for refractory abscess-fistula complexes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of massive continuous irrigation (MCI) and endoscopic debridement for the treatment of refractory abscess-fistula complexes. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center observational study involving 12 patients with refractory abscess-fistula complexes. All patients had experienced long-term treatment failure or had failed multiple treatment modalities. We used over two catheters and inserted them via the gastrointestinal (GI) tract or percutaneously to form a circulation pathway to achieve MCI of normal saline, endoscopic debridement was then performed. The treatment success rate, irrigation volume and treatment duration, time to abscess-fistula complex closure, intra-treatment complications, and recurrence rate were recorded. RESULTS: The treatment success rates were 100%. The median time of previous treatment was 32 days (range 7-912 days). The mean time from the use of the novel treatment strategy to abscess-fistula complex healing was 18.8 ± 11.0 days. The mean volume of irrigation was 10 804 ± 1669 mL/24 h. The mean irrigation time was 16.5 ± 9.2 days, and a median of two irrigation tubes (range 2-5) were used. No complications occurred either during or after the procedure. During the follow-up of 23.1 ± 18.1 months, no recurrence or adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: MCI and endoscopic debridement may be a feasible, safe, and effective alternative treatment for refractory abscess-fistula complexes. Large prospective studies are needed to validate our results.

Strategies used for childhood chronic functional constipation: the SUCCESS evidence synthesis.

Background: Up to 30% of children have constipation at some stage in their life. Although often short-lived, in one-third of children it progresses to chronic functional constipation, potentially with overflow incontinence. Optimal management strategies remain unclear. Objective: To determine the most effective interventions, and combinations and sequences of interventions, for childhood chronic functional constipation, and understand how they can best be implemented. Methods: Key stakeholders, comprising two parents of children with chronic functional constipation, two adults who experienced childhood chronic functional constipation and four health professional/continence experts, contributed throughout the research. We conducted pragmatic mixed-method reviews. For all reviews, included studies focused on any interventions/strategies, delivered in any setting, to improve any outcomes in children (0-18 years) with a clinical diagnosis of chronic functional constipation (excluding studies of diagnosis/assessment) included. Dual reviewers applied inclusion criteria and assessed risk of bias. One reviewer extracted data, checked by a second reviewer. Scoping review: We systematically searched electronic databases (including Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) (January 2011 to March 2020) and grey literature, including studies (any design) reporting any intervention/strategy. Data were coded, tabulated and mapped. Research quality was not evaluated. Systematic reviews of the evidence of effectiveness: For each different intervention, we included existing systematic reviews judged to be low risk of bias (using the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews), updating any meta-analyses with new randomised controlled trials. Where there was no existing low risk of bias systematic reviews, we included randomised controlled trials and other primary studies. The risk of bias was judged using design-specific tools. Evidence was synthesised narratively, and a process of considered judgement was used to judge certainty in the evidence as high, moderate, low, very low or insufficient evidence. Economic synthesis: Included studies (any design, English-language) detailed intervention-related costs. Studies were categorised as cost-consequence, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility or cost-benefit, and reporting quality evaluated using the consensus health economic criteria checklist. Systematic review of implementation factors: Included studies reported data relating to implementation barriers or facilitators. Using a best-fit framework synthesis approach, factors were synthesised around the consolidated framework for implementation research domains. Results: Stakeholders prioritised outcomes, developed a model which informed evidence synthesis and identified evidence gaps. Scoping review: 651 studies, including 190 randomised controlled trials and 236 primary studies, conservatively reported 48 interventions/intervention combinations. Effectiveness systematic reviews: studies explored service delivery models (n = 15); interventions delivered by families/carers (n = 32), wider children's workforce (n = 21), continence teams (n = 31) and specialist consultant-led teams (n = 42); complementary therapies (n = 15); and psychosocial interventions (n = 4). One intervention (probiotics) had moderate-quality evidence; all others had low to very-low-quality evidence. Thirty-one studies reported evidence relating to cost or resource use; data were insufficient to support generalisable conclusions. One hundred and six studies described implementation barriers and facilitators. Conclusions: Management of childhood chronic functional constipation is complex. The available evidence remains limited, with small, poorly conducted and reported studies. Many evidence gaps were identified. Treatment recommendations within current clinical guidelines remain largely unchanged, but there is a need for research to move away from considering effectiveness of single interventions. Clinical care and future studies must consider the individual characteristics of children. Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019159008. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 128470) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 5. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Between 5% and 30% of children experience constipation at some stage. In one-third of these children, this progresses to chronic functional constipation. Chronic functional constipation affects more children with additional needs. We aimed to find and bring together published information about treatments for chronic functional constipation, to help establish best treatments and treatment combinations. We did not cover assessment or diagnosis of chronic functional constipation. This project was guided by a 'stakeholder group', including parents of children with constipation, people who experienced constipation as children, and healthcare professionals/continence experts. We carried out a 'scoping review' and a series of 'systematic reviews'. Our 'scoping review' provides an overall picture of research about treatments, with 651 studies describing 48 treatments. This helps identify important evidence gaps. 'Systematic reviews' are robust methods of bringing together and interpreting research evidence. Our stakeholder group decided to structure our systematic reviews to reflect who delivered the interventions. We brought together evidence about how well treatments worked when delivered by families/carers (32 studies), the wider children's workforce (e.g. general practitioner, health visitor) (21 studies), continence teams (31 studies) or specialist consultant-led teams (42 studies). We also considered complementary therapies (15 studies) and behavioural strategies (4 studies). Care is affected by what is done and how it is done. We brought together evidence about different models of delivering care (15 studies), barriers and facilitators to implementation of treatments (106 studies) and costs (31 studies). Quality of evidence was mainly low to very low. Despite numerous studies, there was often insufficient information to support generalisable conclusions. Our findings generally agreed with current clinical guidelines. Management of childhood chronic functional constipation should be child-centred, multifaceted and adapted according to the individual child, their needs, the situation in which they live and the health-care setting in which they are looked after. Research is needed to address our identified evidence gaps.

Results of transanal irrigation in intestinal dysfunction associated with anorectal malformations. / Resultados del uso del irrigador transanal en la disfunción intestinal asociada a malformaciones anorrectales.

INTRODUCTION: There are multiple tools available to optimize defecation in patients with anorectal malformation (ARM), such as habits, laxatives, and retrograde or anterograde irrigations, which are usually adapted in a progressive and combined fashion. The objective of this study was to assess the incorporation of transanal irrigation (TAI) to constipation and fecal incontinence treatment in patients with ARM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of ARM patients with indication of TAI according to the colorectal pathology unit's intestinal management protocol from 2015 to 2022 was carried out. Following use for over 3 months, patients or their guardians completed a phone survey of our own approved by the ethics committee. RESULTS: 39 ARM patients participated in the study. Pathologies included 11 rectourethral fistulas, 6 rectovesical fistulas, 16 cloacae, 2 rectovaginal fistulas, 2 perineal fistulas, and 2 vestibular fistulas. 44% of them had a sacral index < 0.4. 62% had constipation, and 38% had incontinence. Thanks to TAI, confidence and safety improved in a very high and a high degree in 89% of the patients, whereas time devoted to intestinal management decreased a lot in 68% of them. 79% reported a 9- and 10-point quality-of-life improvement. 92% rated overall satisfaction with TAI with a score of 8, 9, and 10 - 10 meaning "completely satisfied." 100% recommend TAI. CONCLUSION: TAI is a good alternative for the intestinal management of fecal incontinence and constipation.

INTRODUCCION: Existen múltiples herramientas para optimizar la función defecatoria en pacientes con malformación anorrectal (MAR): hábitos, laxantes, irrigaciones retrógradas o anterógradas. Estas se adecuan de forma progresiva y combinada. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la incorporación del dispositivo de irrigación transanal (ITA) al tratamiento del estreñimiento y la incontinencia fecal en pacientes con MAR. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Estudio retrospectivo en pacientes con MAR con indicación del ITA según el protocolo de manejo intestinal del consultorio de patología colorrectal desde el 2015 al 2022. Tras usarlo más de 3 meses, los pacientes o sus cuidadores completaron un cuestionario telefónico propio aprobado por el comité de ética. RESULTADOS: 39 pacientes con MAR: 11 fístulas rectouretrales, 6 rectovesicales, 16 cloacas, 2 rectovaginales, 2 perineales y 2 vestibulares. El 44% presentó un Índice Sacro < 0,4. El 62% presentaban estreñimiento y el 38% incontinencia. Debido al uso del ITA, mejoró la sensación de confianza y seguridad en muy alto y alto grado en el 89% de los pacientes. Disminuyó mucho el tiempo dedicado a su manejo intestinal en el 68%. El 79% refiere mejoría en su calidad de vida con 9 y 10 puntos. El 92% calificaron su satisfacción general con ITA con un valor de 8, 9 y 10 siendo 10 completamente satisfecho. El 100% lo recomiendan. CONCLUSION: El ITA es una buena alternativa para el manejo intestinal de la incontinencia fecal y el estreñimiento.

Arthroscopy versus arthrocentesis and versus conservative treatments for temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of arthroscopy compared to arthrocentesis and to conservative treatments for temporomandibular joint disorders. Thirteen controlled studies on various patient outcomes were included after a systematic search in seven electronic databases. Meta-analyses were conducted separately for arthroscopic surgery (AS) and arthroscopic lysis and lavage (ALL), and short-term (<6 months), intermediate-term (6 months to 5 years), and long-term (≥5 years) follow-up periods were considered. No significant differences in pain reduction and complication rates were found between AS or ALL and arthrocentesis. Regarding improvement in maximum mouth opening (MMO), both AS at intermediate-term and ALL at short-term follow-up were equally efficient when compared to arthrocentesis. However, at intermediate-term follow-up, ALL was superior to arthrocentesis for MMO improvement (mean difference 4.9 mm, 95% confidence interval 2.7-7.1 mm). Trial sequential analysis supported the conclusion of the meta-analysis for MMO improvement for ALL versus arthrocentesis studies at intermediate-term follow-up, but not for the other meta-analyses. Insufficient evidence exists to draw conclusions regarding other patient outcomes or about comparisons between arthroscopy and conservative treatments. Due to the low quality of the primary studies, further research is warranted before final conclusions can be drawn regarding the management of temporomandibular joint disorders.

Resultados del uso del irrigador transanal en la disfunción intestinal asociada a malformaciones anorrectales / Results of the use of the transanal irrigator in intestinal dysfunction associated with anorectal malformations

Introducción: Existen múltiples herramientas para optimizar la función defecatoria en pacientes con malformación anorrectal (MAR): hábitos, laxantes, irrigaciones retrógradas o anterógradas. Estas se adecuan de forma progresiva y combinada. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la incorporación del dispositivo de irrigación transanal (ITA) al tratamiento del estreñimiento y la incontinencia fecal en pacientes con MAR. Materiales y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo en pacientes con MAR con indicación del ITA según el protocolo de manejo intestinal del consultorio de patología colorrectal desde el 2015 al 2022. Tras usarlo más de 3 meses, los pacientes o sus cuidadores completaron un cuestionario telefónico propio aprobado por el comité de ética. Resultados: 39 pacientes con MAR: 11 fístulas rectouretrales, 6 rectovesicales, 16 cloacas, 2 rectovaginales, 2 perineales y 2 vestibulares. El 44% presentó un Índice Sacro < 0,4. El 62% presentaban estreñimiento y el 38% incontinencia. Debido al uso del ITA, mejoró la sensación de confianza y seguridad en muy alto y alto grado en el 89% de los pacientes. Disminuyó mucho el tiempo dedicado a su manejo intestinal en el 68%. El 79% refiere mejoría en su calidad de vida con 9 y 10 puntos. El 92% calificaron su satisfacción general con ITA con un valor de 8, 9 y 10 siendo 10 completamente satisfecho. El 100% lo recomiendan. Conclusión. El ITA es una buena alternativa para el manejo intestinal de la incontinencia fecal y el estreñimiento.(AU)

Introduction: There are multiple tools available to optimize defecation in patients with anorectal malformation (ARM), such as habits, laxatives, and retrograde or anterograde irrigations, which are usually adapted in a progressive and combined fashion. The objective of this study was to assess the incorporation of transanal irrigation (TAI) to constipation and fecal incontinence treatment in patients with ARM. Materials and methods: A retrospective study of ARM patients with indication of TAI according to the colorectal pathology unit’s intestinal management protocol from 2015 to 2022 was carried out. Following use for over 3 months, patients or their guardians completed a phone survey of our own approved by the ethics committee. Results. 39 ARM patients participated in the study. Pathologies included 11 rectourethral fistulas, 6 rectovesical fistulas, 16 cloacae, 2 rectovaginal fistulas, 2 perineal fistulas, and 2 vestibular fistulas. 44% of them had a sacral index < 0.4. 62% had constipation, and 38% had incontinence. Thanks to TAI, confidence and safety improved in a very high and a high degree in 89% of the patients, whereas time devoted to intestinal management decreased a lot in 68% of them. 79% reported a 9- and 10-point quality-of-life improvement. 92% rated overall satisfaction with TAI with a score of 8, 9, and 10 –10 meaning “completely satisfied.” 100% recommend TAI. Conclusion. TAI is a good alternative for the intestinal management of fecal incontinence and constipation.(AU)

2D and 3D Erosion Landscape Analysis of Endodontic-Treated Teeth Using EDTA and HEDP as Chelating Agents: A High-Resolution Micro-Computed Tomographic Study.

This study aimed to assess the amount of erosion during activated endodontic irrigation with either HEDP or EDTA via high-resolution micro-computed tomography. Two root canals of twenty premolars were prepared with ProTaper Next and irrigated with sodium hypochlorite. Palatal canals, which served as control groups, were sealed, while buccal canals were further irrigated with either EDTA (n = 10) or HEDP (n = 10), which served as test groups. Micro-CT was performed to measure erosion depth. For 2D and 3D measurements, non-parametric repeated ANOVA measurements and post hoc tests were performed. 2D analysis showed highly significant differences between the case groups at each position of the root (p ≤ 0.01). The cervical and apical positions showed significant differences in the EDTA group (p = 0.03). The 3D analysis also showed significant differences between both chelating agents (p < 0.01) and the case and control groups (p = 0.01). The mean erosion depths in the cervical, middle, and apical thirds of the EDTA group were 45.75, 41.79, and 32.25 µm, and for the HEDP group were 20.25, 16.40, and 15.96 µm, respectively. HEDP seems to have a significantly less erosive effect. Different irrigation protocols with harsher conditions, as might be the case during endodontic retreatment, could be assessed with micro-CT.

Custo Direto com Tecnologias Para Manejo da Colostomia Definitiva em um Serviço Especializado / Direct Cost of Technologies for Management of Definitive Colostomy in a Specialized Service / Costo Directo de Tecnologías Para el Manejo de la Colostomía Definitiva en un Servicio Especializado

Objetivos:Identificar o custo direto de um serviço especializado com o uso de equipamentos coletores e adjuvantes e compará-lo com o custo simulado da autoirrigação intestinal em pessoas com colostomia definitiva. Método: Estudo descritivo-exploratório conduzido por meio da abordagem quantitativa nos moldes de estudo de casos múltiplos. A amostra por conveniência foi composta de 22 participantes cadastrados em um serviço especializado do norte de Minas Gerais. A coleta de dados foi realizada em prontuários do período de janeiro de 2019 a janeiro de 2020. Resultados: Dos participantes, 59,1% apresentaram complicações relacionadas à estomia e pele periestomia. Em relação aos equipamentos coletores/adjuvantes, o custo variou de 2.340,00 a R$ 5.535,00, custo médio de R$ 4.050,01 e desvio padrão amostral de R$ 770,31. O custo direto médio com autoirrigação de colostomia foi de R$ 3.793,44. Conclusão: O custo direto médio dos equipamentos coletores/adjuvantes foi superior ao da autoirrigação de colostomia, impactado pela presença de complicações e pelo valor do protetor de colostomia.

Objectives:To identify the direct cost of a specialized service with the use of collection equipment and adjuvants and to compare it with the simulated cost of intestinal self-irrigation in people with permanent colostomy. Method: Descriptive-exploratory study conducted through a quantitative approach in the form of multiple-case studies. The convenience sample consisted of 22 participants registered in a specialized service in the north of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Data collection was carried out in medical records from January 2019 to January 2020. Results: Among the participants, 59.1% had complications related to the ostomy and peristomal skin. Regarding collector/adjuvant equipment, the cost ranged from R$ 2,340.00 to R$ 5,535.00, average cost of R$ 4,050.01, and sample standard deviation of R$ 770.31. The average direct cost with colostomy self-irrigation was R$ 3,793.44. Conclusion: The average direct cost of collection/adjuvant equipment was higher than that of colostomy self-irrigation, impacted by the presence of complications and the value of the colostomy protector.

Objetivos:Identificar o custo direto de um serviço especializado com o uso de equipamentos coletores e adjuvantes e compará-lo com o custo simulado da autoirrigação intestinal em pessoas com colostomia definitiva. Método: Estudo descritivo-exploratório conduzido por meio da abordagem quantitativa nos moldes de estudo de casos múltiplos. A amostra por conveniência foi composta de 22 participantes cadastrados em um serviço especializado do norte de Minas Gerais. A coleta de dados foi realizada em prontuários do período de janeiro de 2019 a janeiro de 2020. Resultados: Dos participantes, 59,1% apresentaram complicações relacionadas à estomia e pele periestomia. Em relação aos equipamentos coletores/adjuvantes, o custo variou de 2.340,00 a R$ 5.535,00, custo médio de R$ 4.050,01 e desvio padrão amostral de R$ 770,31. O custo direto médio com autoirrigação de colostomia foi de R$ 3.793,44. Conclusão: O custo direto médio dos equipamentos coletores/adjuvantes foi superior ao da autoirrigação de colostomia, impactado pela presença de complicações e pelo valor do protetor de colostomia.

[Effect of equal temperature bladder irrigation in patients with transurethral resection of prostate: A meta-analysis].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of equal temperature bladder irrigation on bladder spasm, postoperative bleeding, vital signs and discomfort of chills in patients of transurethral resection of prostate using meta-analysis. METHODS: Several electronic databases included Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, VIP, China Biology Medicine (CBM) were searched systematically for published randomized controlled trial about equal temperature bladder irrigation in patients with transurethral resection of prostate before November 20, 2019. Two reviewers selected independently the literature in the light of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, assessed the risk of bias by quality assessment and extracted data which were consisted of clinical efficacy indexes, such as incidence of bladder spasm, severity of bladder spasm, incidence of tube plugging, amount of bladder flushing fluid, time of bladder flushing, heart rate, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, and incidence of chills. Data were pooled using fixed-effects model or random-effects model, and the summary effect measure was calculated by risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.3 Software. RESULTS: In the study, 13 randomized controlled trails met the requirement with a total of 2 033 patients of transurethral resection of prostate were included, of whom 1 015 were carried out with equal temperature bladder irrigation and 1 018 with room temperature bladder irrigation. The results of meta-analysis showed that incidence of bladder spasm [RR=0.51, 95%CI (0.45, 0.57), P < 0.001], severity of bladder spasm [MD=-1.61, 95%CI (-2.00, -1.23), P < 0.001], incidence of urinary blockage [RR=0.29, 95%CI (0.19, 0.44), P < 0.001], dosage of bladder irrigation [MD=-6.75, 95%CI (-7.33, -6.17), P < 0.001], time of bladder rinse [MD=-7.60, 95%CI (-11.91, -3.29), P < 0.001], heart rate [MD=-13.68, 95%CI (-15.19, -12.17), P < 0.001], systolic pressure [MD=-29.26, 95%CI (-31.92, -26.59), P < 0.001], diastolic pressure [MD=-29.36, 95%CI (-31.75, -26.98), P < 0.001], incidence of chills and discomfort [MD=0.37, 95%CI (0.31, 0.44), P < 0.001] in equal temperature group of the patients with transurethral resection of prostate had significantly statistical difference compared with room temperature group. CONCLUSION: Based on current available evidence, equal temperature bladder irrigation reduced the incidence of bladder spasm and urinary blockage, relieved bladder spasm, reduced dosage and time of bladder irrigation, and hardly affected normal vital signs and increased the patient' s comfort.

Drainage or lavage as a salvage manoeuvre after intrathecal drug errors: A systematic review with therapeutic recommendations.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage and lavage are reported to reduce drug exposure after inadvertant intrathecal drug administration errors. This reviews aims to provide recommendations for this salvage technique, with regard to methodology, effectiveness and adverse events. DESIGN: Systematic review. A search in the databases of Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Trials and Google Scholar was performed in 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All reports of individual patient data with CSF drainage or lavage with a percutaneous lumbar access for an intrathecal drug error were included. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome is the description and count of CSF drainage or lavage, such as times and volume of drainage, volume of replacement and type of replacement fluid. Secondary outcomes are the effects, adverse events and overall outcome. MAIN RESULTS: 58 cases were found, of which 24 were paediatric cases. There was a large variance in methodology, with regard to volume t and type of replacement fluid. In 45% of the cases the intrathecal drug removal continued. The effects were specifically reported in 27 cases, all demonstrated drug removal based on drug concentrations in the CSF (n = 20) and clinical signs (n = 7). Adverse effects were sought for in 17 cases and found intracranial haemorrhage in 3 cases. No interventions were required for these adverse events and the only reported long-term sequelae in these three patients was short-term memory impairment up to 6 months after the event (n = 1). The overall outcome depended largely on the causative agent. CONCLUSIONS: This review shows that CSF drainage or lavage leads to intrathecal drug removal, but it is unsure if this intervention leads to improved overall patient outcome. Based on aggregated data from case reports, we provide recommendations that may guide clinicians. The risk-benefit ratio should be weighed on a case-to-case basis.

Bidirectional Irrigation System to Treat a Difficult Wound: A Case Series.

AIMS: To date, there is no distinct principle determining whether to use irrigation under negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT). We developed a new economical device to manage difficult wounds, employing 1 of 2 techniques depending on the wound condition. METHODS: This case series study was conducted in 12 patients with difficult wound, from 2017 to 2018. Four patients were treated with Type A bidirectional irrigation system (wound irrigation), while 8 patients were treated with Type B bidirectional irrigation system (wound irrigation combined with NPWT). RESULTS: In the Type A device group, inflammatory profiles in case I, case IV, and case VIII were not monitored due to the stability of their wound. The mean recovery period was 3.75 weeks (2-8 weeks), with decreases in 100% healing rate. In the Type B device group, we noted an average of 71% reduction in inflammatory profiles. All patients' infections were resolved or were healing, and 7 patients recovered satisfactorily. The recovery period ranged from 4 to 17 weeks, with a median value of 7 weeks. CONCLUSION: Bidirectional irrigation system decreases secondary infections and complications, and increases the healing rate in patients with difficult wound.

Prophylactic intraoperative wound irrigation with antibiotic solution for the prevention of surgical incisional wound infections: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the use of prophylactic intraoperative wound irrigation (pIOWI) for reducing surgical-site infections (SSIs), particularly surgical incisional wounds, and opinions are divided on whether an antibiotic should be mixed with the solution used for incisional wound irrigation. No large, reliable cohort studies or meta-analyses of pIOWI for surgical incisional wounds were found in PubMed or Embase. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Insight, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for primary research articles investigating the relevance of pIOWI with antibiotics for SSIs. The initial search was limited to human studies published before January 2022, which were indexed as randomized controlled trials (RCTs); clinical trials; or observational, cross-sectional, or cohort studies. We used R statistical software version 4.1.2 for this meta-analysis. RESULTS: The odds ratio of the random-effects model was 0.519 [95% confidence interval (CI); 0.311, 0.864, P-value < 0.0117], indicating that the intervention had a statistically significant effect on surgical complications. To examine the heterogeneity of the entire study, we performed statistical analysis (τ2 (tau square) = 0.4175 [0.0732; 2.8178]; τ (tau) = 0.6461 [0.2706; 1.6786]; Higgins' I2 = 64.0% [34.8%; 80.1%]; and H = 1.67 [1.24; 2.24]). CONCLUSIONS: Many studies have shown that inclusion of antibiotics in the irrigation solution significantly lowers the rate of soft-tissue-related SSIs, but those studies contain both heterogeneity and many biases. Further large, prospective RCTs only limited to incisional SSIs and excluding other variables and biases in the field of plastic surgery are needed.

Arthrocentesis versus non-surgical intervention as initial treatment for temporomandibular joint arthralgia: a randomized controlled trial with long-term follow-up.

Arthrocentesis for arthralgia of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is often only indicated when conservative, non-surgical interventions have failed. However, performing arthrocentesis as initial therapy may facilitate earlier and better recuperation of the joint. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of this therapy with a long-term follow-up. Eighty-four patients were randomly allocated to receive either arthrocentesis as initial treatment (n = 41) or non-surgical intervention (n = 43). Pain (100-mm visual analogue scale, VAS) and mandibular function impairment questionnaire scores (MFIQ, 0-100) were recorded at 3, 12, and 26 weeks, and ≥ 5 years (median 6.2, interquartile range 5.6-7.4 years). Univariable analyses were performed and linear mixed-effect models were constructed. Patients in the arthrocentesis group experienced significantly lower TMJ arthralgia compared to those treated non-surgically (pain during movement: -10.23 mm (95% confidence interval -17.86; -2.60); pain at rest: - 8.39 mm (95% confidence interval -13.70; -3.08)), while mandibular function remained similar in the two groups (MFIQ -2.41 (95% confidence interval -8.61; 3.78)). Of the final sample, 10 patients (10/39, 26%) in the non-surgical intervention group and two patients (2/34, 6%) in the arthrocentesis group received additional treatment during follow-up. Thus, initial treatment with arthrocentesis reduced TMJ arthralgia more efficaciously than non-surgical intervention in the long term, while maintaining similar mandibular function.

Comparative evaluation of debris and irrigation extruded apically using different design of needles and penetration depth - An In Vitro study.

Aim: : The aim of this study was to measure the amount of material extruded in the periapical area using three irrigation needles (Max-I-Probe, NaviTip Fx and IrriFlex flexible needle). Materials and Methods: : Mandibular premolars were selected for this study and glass vials were used to gather the extruded debris and they were preweighed. The samples were divided into two groups: Group A (1 mm penetration of needle from working length), which was subdivided into three subgroups: Subgroup A1: Irrigation was made by Max-I-Probe. Subgroup A2: Irrigation was made by NaviTip Fx. Subgroup A3: Irrigation was made by IrriFlex flexible needle. Group B (3 mm penetration of needle), which was subdivided into three subgroups: Subgroup B1: Irrigation was made by Max-I-Probe. Subgroup B2: Irrigation was made by NaviTip Fx. Subgroup B3: Irrigation was made by IrriFlex flexible needle. XP-endo Shaper was used for chemomechanical preparation. After removal from vials, the teeth were incubated and then removed from the incubator and weighed again three times. The average of the readings was taken. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and least significance difference tests were applied to analyse data. Results: : All of the needles caused debris extrusion. There was a significant difference between groups (P ≤ 0.001) according to the depth of penetration. The lowest value for debris was observed in subgroup B3 while subgroup A2 had shown the highest mean. Conclusion: Results revealed that the design and depth of needles significantly affected the debris extrusion. Using more flexible needles and shorter penetration depth for irrigation so that we don't need to push the needles so far apically.

The effect of simulation on nursing students' knowledge about colostomy irrigation: a quasi-experimental study / Efecto de la simulación en los conocimientos de estudiantes de enfermería sobre irrigación de colostomía: estudio cuasiexperimental / Efeito da simulação no conhecimento de estudantes de enfermagem sobre irrigação de colostomia: estudo quase experimental

ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the effect of clinical simulation and of a lectured class on Nursing students' knowledge about the colostomy irrigation procedure. Method: a quasi-experimental study conducted in September 2019 with Nursing students attending Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte in Natal, Brazil. The instruments used were a questionnaire targeted at sociodemographic issues and a knowledge analysis tool at three different moments. The Control Group had a lectured class and the Intervention Group took part in the laboratory simulation. The Chi-Square and Mann-Whitney tests were used for data analysis. Results: no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of the sociodemographic profile. In the analysis of the means of correct answers, better measures were observed in the post-test of both groups when compared to the pre-test; however, in the retention test, the students from the Intervention Group had better and statistically significant results than those from the Control Group (p-value=0.015). Conclusion: it is noticed that both teaching strategies exerted a positive effect on the students' learning process. Although both are equally important and effective, simulation showed better performance in knowledge retention. It is expected that this research enables educators to reflect on their work and allows them to use strategies that enhance their teaching practice, in order to benefit teaching and the students' development.

RESUMEN Objetivo: comparar el efecto de la simulación clínica y de una clase expositiva en los conocimientos de estudiantes de Enfermería sobre el procedimiento de irrigación de colostomía. Método: estudio cuasiexperimental realizado en septiembre de 2019 con estudiantes de Enfermería de la Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte en Natal, Brasil. Como instrumentos se utilizaron un cuestionario dirigido a cuestiones sociodemográficas y una herramienta de análisis del conocimiento, en tres ocasiones diferentes. Al Grupo Control se le ofreció la clase expositiva y el Grupo Intervención participó de la simulación en laboratorio. Para el análisis de los datos se emplearon las pruebas de Chi-Cuadrado y de Mann-Whitney. Resultados: no se observaron diferencias estadísticas significativas entre los grupos en relación con el perfil sociodemográfico. En el análisis de los valores medios de respuestas correctas se observaron mejores medidas en el post-test de ambos grupos, en comparación con el pre-test; sin embargo, en el test de retención, los estudiantes del Grupo Intervención obtuvieron mejores resultados que los del Grupo Controle, además de ser estadísticamente significativos (valor p =0,015). Conclusión: se percibió que ambas estrategias de enseñanza produjeron un efecto positivo en el proceso de aprendizaje de los estudiantes. Aunque ambas son importantes y eficaces, la simulación presentó mejor desempeño en la retención de conocimientos. Se espera que este trabajo de investigación permita que los educadores reflexiones acerca de su trabajo y haga posible la utilización de estrategias que mejoren su práctica docente, a fin de beneficiar la educación y el desarrollo de los estudiantes.

RESUMO Objetivo: comparar o efeito da simulação clínica e da aula expositiva dialogada no conhecimento de estudantes de enfermagem sobre o procedimento de irrigação de colostomia. Método: estudo quase experimental, realizado em setembro de 2019 com acadêmicos de enfermagem da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, em Natal, Brasil. Utilizaram-se como instrumentos um questionário voltado para questões sociodemográficas e um de análise de conhecimento em três diferentes ocasiões. O grupo controle teve aula expositiva dialogada e o grupo intervenção participou da simulação em laboratório. Para análise de dados foram usados os testes Qui-Quadrado e o de Mann-Whitney. Resultados: observou-se ausência de diferenças estatísticas significantes entre os grupos quanto ao perfil sociodemográfico. Na análise das médias de acertos, observaram-se melhores medidas no pós-teste dos dois grupos, quando comparado ao pré-teste, contudo, no teste de retenção os discentes do grupo intervenção tiveram resultados melhores que o grupo controle e estatisticamente significantes (p-valor=0,015). Conclusão: percebeu-se que as duas estratégias de ensino produziram efeito positivo no processo de aprendizagem dos discentes. Apesar de ambas serem importantes e eficazes, a simulação apresentou melhor desempenho na retenção do conhecimento. Espera-se que a pesquisa possibilite aos educadores a reflexão de seu trabalho e oportunize a utilização de estratégias que aprimorem sua prática docente, com vistas a beneficiar o ensino e desenvolvimento dos estudantes.

Half-Saline Versus Normal-Saline as Irrigation Solutions in Burr Hole Craniostomy to Treat Chronic Subdural Hematomata: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of half-saline (HS) serum as an irrigation solution in chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) surgery using the burr hole craniostomy (BHC) technique. Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted in university hospital referral centers from 2020 to 2021. Sixty-three patients with CSDH eligible for BHC were primarily enrolled. Two patients were excluded because of concurrent stroke. Sixty-one patients were randomly allocated into case (HS=30) and control (normal-saline [NS]=31) groups. HS was used to irrigate the hematoma in the case group and NS was used in the control group. The patients were followed-up. Clinical variables including demographic and medical findings, postoperative computed tomography findings, postoperative complications, hospitalization period, recurrence rate, and functional status measured by the Barthel type B index were recorded. Results: Forty-six of 61 patients were male (75.4%), and the patients' mean age was 65.4±16.9 years, with equal distribution between the 2 groups. Postoperative effusion and postoperative hospital stay duration were significantly lower in the HS group than in the NS group (p=0.002 and 0.033, respectively). The postoperative recurrence within 3 months in both groups was approximately equal (6.6%). In terms of functional outcomes and postoperative complications, HS showed similar results to those of NS. Conclusion: HS as an irrigation fluid in BHC effectively reduced postoperative effusion and hospital stay duration without considerable complications. Trial Registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: IRCT20200608047688N1.

Lavage Volume of Arthrocentesis in the Management of Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The aim of this study was to investigate the most effective lavage volume of arthrocentesis in the management of temporomandibular disorders. A comprehensive electronic search, based on the PRISMA guidelines, was performed, which included a computer search with specific keywords, a reference list search and a manual search. The inclusion criteria were the following: a randomized controlled trial, at least 20 subjects who underwent arthrocentesis, mention of the irrigation materials used for the arthrocentesis, mention of the irrigation volumes used for the arthrocentesis, MMO and pain measured as VAS or NRS, were reported as outcome figures, mention of a specific diagnosis or signs and symptoms, and inclusion of the data on the MMO or VAS/NRS at 6-month follow-up. Sixteen publications were enrolled in the meta-analysis, comparing arthrocentesis with a lavage volume <150 mL and arthrocentesis with a lavage volume ≥150 mL, in the efficacy of the improvement in the mouth opening and pain reduction. The results revealed the group with a lavage volume <150 mL had a greater improvement in the mouth opening and pain reduction. However, results are to be interpreted with caution, due to the paucity of the randomized controlled literature and other confounding factors. Further high-quality studies are required to provide a better conclusion to the treatment outcomes of the different lavage volumes.

Drainage of pancreatic fluid collections in acute pancreatitis: A comprehensive overview.

Moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis is characterized by local and systemic complications. Systemic complications predominate the early phase of acute pancreatitis while local complications are important in the late phase of the disease. Necrotic fluid collections represent the most important local complication. Drainage of these collections is indicated in the setting of infection, persistent or new onset organ failure, compressive or pressure symptoms, and intraabdominal hypertension. Percutaneous, endoscopic, and minimally invasive surgical drainage represents the various methods of drainage with each having its own advantages and disadvantages. These methods are often complementary. In this minireview, we discuss the indications, timing, and techniques of drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with focus on percutaneous catheter drainage. We also discuss the novel methods and techniques to improve the outcomes of percutaneous catheter drainage.

Chemical burn to the skin: A systematic review of first aid impacts on clinical outcomes.

Chemical burns can cause deep injury and subsequently significant scarring to the skin. The mechanism and pathophysiology of chemical burns is distinct to thermal burns, and recommended first aid approaches are consequently different. Twenty minutes of cool running water is an effective first aid measure to improve outcomes after thermal burn. For chemical burns to the skin, the recommendations are immediate water lavage for 60 min, removal of contaminated clothing if not stuck to the skin and then covering the wound with a sterile dressing. This review assesses the peer-reviewed literature to find the evidence behind the efficacy of cutaneous chemical burn first aid on short term outcomes such as length of hospital stay, depth of burn and longer-term outcomes such as scarring; in particular, the effect of immediate or early water lavage, and the effect of the duration of water lavage. Ocular chemical burns were not included in this review. The review suggests some evidence to support that the early application of cool water irrigation may reduce length of hospital stay and the extent of scarring. Community education should emphasize that water irrigation is recommended and that the earlier this happens, the better.