Real-world experience with the new pulsed solid-state Thulium: YAG laser (Thulio) for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate.

PURPOSE: The solid-state Thulium laser (Tm: YAG) is a novel alternative to the widely used Holmium laser for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) due to its relatively high peak power. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of a new pulsed Tm: YAG laser in its first application in humans. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected for the first 103 patients who underwent EEP with a new pulsed solid-state Tm: YAG laser (Thulio®, Dornier MedTech Systems GmbH, Weßling, Germany). Peri- and postoperative data were assessed. Procedure-specific complications were graded using Clavien-Dindo Classifications (CDC). Patients were interviewed 15 months after the surgery to evaluate functional and long-term outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS®). RESULTS: The mean preoperative prostate volume was 105.6 ± 55.0 ml. Median enucleation speed was 4.1 g per minute (range 1.1-9.7). Short-term postoperative complications occurred in 21 patients (20.4%), but no high-grade complications (CDC ≥ IV) were observed. Five patients suffered gross haematuria and required reintervention (CDC IIIb; 4.9%). After 15 months, 76 patients (73.8%) participated in the follow-up interview, where seven patients (9.2%) reported complications, including two reinterventions for urethral strictures (CDC IIIb; 2.6%). Most patients reported an improvement in continence (54.0%) and urine stream (93.4%), but no difference in erectile function (81.6%). No persistent dysuria was reported. Patient satisfaction with the surgery results was very high (96.1%). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate with the new pulsed solid-state Tm: YAG laser is a safe and effective option for surgical BPH treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register number: DRKS00031676. Registration date: 10 May 2023, retrospectively registered.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of picosecond KTP and fractional thulium lasers on pigmented-type periorbital dark circles.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of picosecond KTP in reducing peri-ocular dark circles caused mainly by excessive pigmentation and to compare Picosecond KTP with Thulium laser ability in reducing the intensity and extent of peri-ocular dark circles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This split-face prospective study included twelve women with periorbital dark circles (pigmented or mixed-pigmented type). The left lower eyelid was treated using the PicoHi machine (HIRONIC Ltd), a full beam Q-switched Nd-YAG provided by KTP crystal (523 nm) at settings of 0.3 J/cm2, 5 mm, 5 Hz, and 300 Ps. Whereas the right lower eyelid was treated using the Lavieen machine (WON TECH Co., Ltd), a fractional Thulium laser (1927 nm) at setting 1320 mJ/cm2, 30 × 15 mm, 1500 microseconds. Patients received a series of 3 treatment sessions, given at 4-week intervals. RESULTS: The 532-nm full beam Q-switched KTP and fractional Thulium lasers were more likely to induce post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation rather than decrease the pigmentation. The risk is higher with a Q-switched KTP laser, which may be attributed to the skin tone of the participants. Nonetheless, some improvement in the pigmented type of PDCs, although not detected clinically, was documented by the VISIA software. CONCLUSION: No solid conclusion can be drawn from the results of the study. Picosecond KTP and Thulium lasers may have a role in reducing PDCs yet more studies should be performed in order to determine the exact impact these lasers have.

Erosion of embolization coil into the renal collecting system: Retrograde fragmentation of stone and coil via thulium laser lithotripsy.

A 50-year-old female developed kidney stones on an eroded embolization coil 16 months after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) related bleeding complications. Retrograde ureteroscopy and thulium laser lithotripsy was performed to fragment the exposed portion of the coil into clinically insignificant pieces. Thulium laser coil fragmentation remains a potential strategy to remove eroded coils and their associated kidney stones; however, recurrent stone formation on the coil stump may necessitate repeat intervention if this conservative approach is pursued over radical antegrade coil removal. This case highlights the importance of continued surveillance and multidisciplinary management in preventing and treating coil erosion after PCNL.

Role of Thulium Laser and Holmium Laser in the Surgical Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia are generally treated holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP). Therefore, it is important to analyze the several surgical procedures used for benign prostatic hyperplasia in terms of their role, effectiveness and safety. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis by searching databases of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Finally, we selected 10 papers including 2,456 patients treated with of thulium laser and holmium laser in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. We did the analysis using RevMan 5.0 with the selected studies until 26 October 2023. Results: ThuLEP resulted in a smaller reduction in haemoglobin (MD: -0.22, 95%CI -0.32 to -0.13, P<0.001) and a shorter hospital stay (MD: -0.29, 95%CI -0.38 to -0.20, P <0.001). During the postoperative follow-ups, only the IPSS (MD: -0.03; 95%CI -0.11 to -0.06; P 0.58) at the six-month showed statistically significant differences. Conclusion: ThuLEP has greater security and faster growth than HoLEP.

A novel technique for thulium laser enucleation of the prostate: anterior releasing with ThuLEP (ARTh technique).

Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) is a highly effective approach to the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. We present here a description of the "ARTh Technique" and the benefits it offers in terms of improved visualization, short operation times, and easy recognition of the dissection plane, describing specifically the anterior release (AR) technique using ThuLEP(Th). Included in this retrospective study were 32 consecutive patients operated on between January 2022-November 2022. Parameters were measured before and after the procedure: the International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS), maximum flow rate(Qmax), post-void residual urine(PVR) prostate-specific antigen(PSA), prostate volume, operation-time, morcellation-time, catheterization-time and presence of transient urinary incontinence, and compared. The median age of patients undergoing enucleation of the prostate using the ARTh technique was 64 years (range: 44-83). The median prostate volume of the patients was 83.5 ml(50-128 ml), preoperative-IPSS was 24.8(15-33), postoperative-IPSS was 7(5-11), preoperative-Qmax was 8.1 ml/Sects. (5-11.5 ml/sec), postoperative-Qmax was 26.9 ml/Sect. (20.8-34 ml/sec), preoperative-PVR was 145 ml(75-258 ml), postoperative-PVR was 36.2 ml(0-66 ml), total operation time was 51.4 min(28-82 min), enucleation time was 36.9 min(19-51 min) and morcellation time was 15.3 min(8-27 min). The ARTh technique is a safe procedure that allows the surgeon to easily recognize and adhere to the defined dissection plane, thus decreasing operation times, significantly reducing the rate of postoperative transient urinary incontinence (TUI).

A prospective analysis of thulium laser enucleation in benign prostatic hyperplasia comparing low- and high-power approaches for prostates exceeding 80 g.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the perioperative and functional outcomes of low-power and high-power thulium:YAG VapoEnucleation (ThuVEP) of the prostate for the treatment of large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (> 80 ml). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective analysis of 80 patients with symptomatic BPO and prostatic enlargement (more than 80 ml) was conducted. They were divided randomly into two groups (40 patients in each group). One group was treated with low-power ThuVEP, and the other group was treated with high-power ThuVEP. All patients were assessed preoperatively and early postoperatively, and 12-month follow-up data were analyzed. The complications were noted and classified according to the modified Clavien classification system. RESULTS: The mean age at surgery was 68 (± 6.1) years, and the mean prostate volume was 112 (± 20.1) cc, and there were no differences between the groups (p = 0.457). The mean operative time was 88.4 ± 11.79 min for group A and 93.4 ± 16.34 min for group B, while the mean enucleation time was 59.68 ± 7.24 min for group A and 63.13 ± 10.75 min for group B. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding catheterization time and postoperative stay. The quality of life (QoL), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoiding residual urine (PVR), and prostate volume improved significantly after treatment and were not significantly different between those treated with the different energies. The incidence of complications was low and did not differ between both the groups. CONCLUSION: Low-power ThuVEP is feasible, safe, and effective with comparable results with high-power ThuVEP in the treatment of BPO.

Surgical outcomes of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in community aging males with or without preoperative urinary retention.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the surgical outcomes of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in older males with or without preoperative urinary retention (UR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a study on selected patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who underwent either thulium:YAG laser (vela XL) prostate enucleation (ThuLEP) or bipolar plasma enucleation of the prostate (B-TUEP) at the geriatric urology department of our institution. The studied patients were categorized into two groups, namely the UR group and the non-UR group, on the basis of whether they experienced UR in the 1 month preceding their surgery. Their clinical outcomes following prostate endoscopic surgery were evaluated and analyzed. RESULTS: Our results revealed comparable outcomes for operation time, length of hospital stay, percentage of tissue removed, re-catheterization rate, and urinary tract infection rate within the 1 month between the B-TUEP and ThuLEP surgery groups, regardless of UR history. However, the non-UR B-TUEP group experienced more blood loss relative to the non-UR ThuLEP group (P = .004). Notably, patients with UR exhibited significantly greater changes in IPSS total, IPSS voiding, and prostate-specific antigen values relative to those without UR. CONCLUSIONS: Both ThuLEP and B-TUEP were effective in treating BPH-related bladder outlet obstruction. Our study identified more pronounced changes in IPSS total, IPSS voiding, and prostate-specific antigens within the UR group. Moreover, the rate of postoperative UR in this group was not higher than that observed in the non-UR group. Our study also revealed that the presumed benefits of laser surgery in reducing blood loss were less pronounced for patients with UR.

Flexible ureteroscopic treatment of kidney stones: How do the new laser systems change our concepts?

Objective: Flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) has become a widely accepted and effective technique for treating kidney stones. With the development of new laser systems, the fURS approach has evolved significantly. This literature review aims to examine the current state of knowledge on fURS treatment of kidney stones, with a particular focus on the impact of the latest laser technologies on clinical outcomes and patient safety. Methods: We conducted a search of the PubMed/PMC, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane Databases for all randomized controlled trial articles on laser lithotripsy in September 2023 without time restriction. Results: We found a total of 22 relevant pieces of literature. Holmium laser has been used for intracavitary laser lithotripsy for nearly 30 years and has become the golden standard for the treatment of urinary stones. However, the existing holmium laser cannot completely powder the stone, and the retropulsion of the stone after the laser emission and the thermal damage to the tissue have caused many problems for clinicians. The introduction of thulium fiber laser and Moses technology brings highly efficient dusting lithotripsy effect through laser innovation, limiting pulse energy and broadening pulse frequency. Conclusion: While the holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser remains the primary choice for endoscopic laser lithotripsy, recent technological advancements hint at a potential new gold standard. Parameter range, retropulsion effect, laser fiber adaptability, and overall system performance demand comprehensive attention. The ablation efficacy of high-pulse-frequency devices relies on precise targeting, which may pose practical challenges.

Nephron-sparing ureteroscopic surgery vs. radical nephroureterectomy: comparable survival-outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study investigates the utility of ureteroscopic surgery (URS) as an alternative to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in managing upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), with a focus on survival outcomes and re-evaluation of current the European Association of Urology guidelines criteria. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multi-institutional review of 143 UTUC patients treated with URS (n = 35) or RNU (n = 108). Clinicopathological factors were analyzed, and survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional-hazards models. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 27 months. Overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) were comparable between the URS and RNU groups (OS: HR 2.42, 95% CI 0.63-9.28, P = 0.0579; rPFS: HR 1.82, 95% CI 0.60-5.47, P = 0.1641). URS conferred superior renal function preservation. In patients characterized by factors such as radiographically invisible lesions, negative cytology, pTa stage, low-grade tumors, and multiple lesions, the OS outcomes with URS were comparable to those with RNU as follows: radiographically invisible lesions (P = 0.5768), negative cytology (P = 0.7626), pTa stage (P = 0.6694), low-grade tumors (P = 0.9870), and multiple lesions (P = 0.8586). CONCLUSION: URS offers survival outcomes similar to RNU, along with better renal function preservation, especially in low-risk UTUC patients. These findings underscore the urgency of re-evaluating the current EAU guidelines and encourage further research into determining the ideal patient selection for URS in UTUC treatment.

Efficacy of skin rejuvenation with a fractional 1927-nm thulium laser alone or combined with a chemical peel: a controlled histopathological preliminary study in a mouse model.

Many patients demand minimally invasive treatments for skin rejuvenation, such as nonablative laser and superficial chemical peels. Combination therapy yet has not been studied histopathologically. The purpose of this study is to assess the histopathological efficacy of a 1927-nm thulium laser-assisted salicylic acid (SA) peel in skin rejuvenation. A six-segment table was drawn on the shaved back of C57BL/6 mouse. All segments were irradiated with the thulium laser-different tips and passes were used for specific segments. A 30% SA peel was then applied to the right-hand segments. After treatment, the skin samples were collected from each segment and examined for dermal thickness, collagen density, and melanin content. Greater thickness was seen in the combination therapy group compared with the laser alone group and in those segments receiving more passes with larger beam-sized tip. Collagen density increased in all treated skin segments, irrespective of the group. No adverse events were noted in the treated areas. The sample size was small and mouse skin has histological differences with human skin. The combination of a thulium laser and 30% SA peel has a synergistic effect on dermal thickness, so that can be suggested as a novel skin rejuvenation technique.

Efficacy and safety of transurethral thulium laser enucleation versus robot-assisted prostatectomy for large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare perioperative outcomes between Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and robotic-assisted simple pasta-ectomy (RASP)for large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia(> 80 ml). In August 2023, we undertook a comprehensive search of major global databases including PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar, focusing solely on articles written in English. Studies that were merely reviews or protocols without any specific published data were omitted. Furthermore, articles that comprised conference abstracts or content not pertinent to our subject of study were also disregarded. To calculate the inverse variances and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for categorical variables' mean differences, we employed the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel approach along with random-effects models. The findings were denoted in the form of odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. A p-value less than 0.05 was deemed to indicate statistical significance. Our finalized meta-analysis incorporated six articles, including one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and five cohort studies. These studies accounted for a total of 1218 patients, 944 of whom underwent Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and 274 who underwent Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy (RASP). The pooled analysis from these six papers demonstrated that compared to RASP, HoLEP had a shorter hospital stay, shorter catheterization duration, and a lower blood transfusion rate. Moreover, HoLEP patients exhibited a smaller reduction in postoperative hemoglobin levels. Statistically, there were no significant differences between the two procedures regarding operative time, postoperative PSA, the weight of prostate specimens, IPSS, Qmax, PVR, QoL, and postoperative complications. (HoLEP) and (RASP) are both effective and safe procedures for treating large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia. HoLEP, with its benefits of shorter catheterization and hospitalization duration, lesser decline in postoperative hemoglobin, and reduced blood transfusion needs, stands as a preferred choice for treating extensive prostate enlargement. However, further validation through more high-quality clinical randomized trials is required.

Thulium Laser for the Treatment of Posterior Urethral Valves in Infants.

Objective: Thulium laser (ThL) has become popular in urology, because of its powerful action on tissue, achieving optimal ablation and hemostasis. Aim of our article was to evaluate efficacy of ThL in infants affected by posterior urethral valve (PUV) ablation. Patients and Methods: Clinical charts of 25 infants (age ≤12 months) who underwent PUV ablation were retrospectively reviewed. According to our protocol, all patients performed voiding cystourethrography and cystoscopy 6 to 8 months after initial treatment. Several factors, including age and weight at surgery, operative time, postoperative bleeding, catheterization period, postoperative urinary retention, retreatment for valve remnants, and stricture at follow-up, were evaluated. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed. Results: Mean age at primary surgery was 4.5 months (5 days-10.5 months) and mean weight at primary surgery was 5.7 kg (2.5-10.3 kg). Mean operative time was 29.5 minutes (range 15-50 minutes). None of the patients experienced intraoperative and postoperative bleeding. In all cases, postoperative catheterization period was 1 day. Residual valves were found in 6 of 25 (24%) patients. No cases of urethral stricture were registered during follow-up (48.4 months, range: 11-95). Analyzing literature data using other techniques, complication rate of ThL PUV ablation seems lower than standard treatments (electrofulguration, cold knife) and comparable with those reported with other laser techniques. Conclusion: PUV ablation with ThL has proven to be feasible and safe in infants. Further studies are needed to define the real effectiveness of this laser technology in PUV ablation. Miniaturized instruments and ThL technology make early PUV treatment feasible also in low body weight newborns.

Current laser therapy options for endoscopic treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Endoscopic management via retrograde ureteroscopic laser ablation of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has become the preferred treatment modality for low-risk tumors. The most popular ablative lasers over the past 15-20 years have been the holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) and neodymium (Nd:YAG) lasers, but recently the thulium (Th:YAG) laser has emerged as a potential alternative. This review compares the mechanism of action, physiological properties and effects, and oncologic outcomes of Ho:YAG/Nd:YAG lasers versus the Th:YAG laser for UTUC treatment. Potential advantages of the Th:YAG laser over existing technologies are outlined, followed by a discussion of emerging laser technologies in UTUC management.

Surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Thulium enucleation versus single-port transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy.

Objective: The objective of this work is to compare our outcomes using thulium laser enucleation of prostate (ThuLEP) to the single-port robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (SP RASP) in the surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2017 through December 2021 of men who underwent SP RASP and ThuLEP performed by a single surgeon with an enucleation experience of >300 cases and extensive robotic experience. The primary outcome was changed in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were operative time, length of stay (LOS), change in post-void residuals (PVR), de novo stress- or urge-urinary incontinence (SUI, UUI), and rate of complications. Results: One hundred two patients underwent surgery during the study period: 33 RASP and 69 ThuLEP. There was no difference in preoperative characteristics, including age and body mass index, between both groups. Changes in IPSS scores postoperatively were not significant between SP RASP versus ThuLEP (-17 vs. -14, p = 0.2956). SP RASP had a longer operative time (180 vs. 90 min, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in LOS (0 vs. 0 days, p = 0.2904). There was no difference in change in PVR (-96 vs. -91 mL, p = 0.8504). SP RASP patients had significantly less postoperative SUI than ThuLEP (0 vs. 13 patients, p = 0.0083), while there was no difference in UUI between both groups (4 vs. 2 patients, p = 0.0843). There was no difference in 30-day complication rate (21.2% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.9517), although there were three ThuLEP patients with Clavien-Dindo Class III or higher complication. Conclusions: There was no difference in change in IPSS scores between the two groups. ThuLEP is associated with shorter postoperative catheter days and decreased operative times. Hospital LOS was equivalent. SP RASP demonstrates significantly improved continence rates. Though SP RASP is within the initial learning curve at our institution, early results demonstrate the role for this modality alongside ThuLEP in the treatment of large gland BPH.

Simultaneous thulium laser resection of the prostate and transperineal prostate biopsy in clinically diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer with bladder outlet obstruction.

Metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients complicated with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) are often referred to a urologist. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with indwelling catheter usually be the initial management. To retrospectively analysis the safety and efficacy of simultaneous thulium laser resection of the prostate (TmLRP) and transperineal prostate biopsy in metastatic prostate cancer with bladder outlet obstruction. From January 2016 to December 2021, 67 clinically diagnosed mPCa with BOO patients were included in this study. All patients were preoperatively assessed with international prostate symptom score (IPSS), QoL, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume evaluation by transrectal ultrasound, postvoid residual urine volume (PVR), and maximum flow rate (Qmax). Preoperative and perioperative parameters at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up were also evaluated. All complications were recorded. Simultaneous TmLRP and transperineal prostate biopsy had obvious advantages for clinically diagnosed mPCa patients with BOO, including short overall operation time (52 ± 23.3 min), little hemoglobin decrease (0.6 ± 0.7 g/l), and short hospital stay (average 3.8 days). In addition, simultaneous TmLRP and transperineal prostate biopsy also brought them significant improvement on IPSS, QoL score, Qmax, and PVR volume (P < 0.001) at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up after operation compared to preoperative parameters. Complications were in a low incidence. Simultaneous TmLRP and transperineal prostate biopsy is a bloodless operation with immediate effect and little perioperative complication. Importantly, it is a promising technology in the diagnosis and treatment of clinically diagnosed mPCa patients with BOO.

Safety, feasibility, and quality of thulium laser en-bloc resection for treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: Trans-Urethral Resection of Bladder Tumors (TURBT) is a critical step in diagnosis, staging and treatment of bladder tumors. Conventional TURBT (cTURBT) involves the electro-resection of the tumor into small fragments. This technique leads to concerns about the completeness of resection, under-staging, bleeding, cancer cell implantation, and most importantly, risk of tumour recurrence. To circumvent this, laser en-bloc resection of bladder tumors has been introduced. OBJECTIVES: Assessment of the safety, feasibility, and quality of Thulium Laser En-bloc Resection of Tumors (TmL-ERBT) for treatment of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) in various urinary bladder walls as a primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints were to investigate the feasibility of thulium laser use in the re-staging cystoscopy and to evaluate the learning curve of TmL-ERBT. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study including all newly diagnosed patients, above 18 years old, with a urinary bladder mass ≤ 4 cm in maximal dimension (measured via bladder ultrasound or CT or MRI). All patients underwent TmL-ERBT under regional anaesthesia in a lithotomy position. All intraoperative complications such as obturator nerve reflex, bladder perforation, and significant bleeding were recorded. Postoperative variables such as the mean catheterization time, bladder irrigation fluid volume and duration, and the mean of hospital stay as well as the postoperative complications were recorded. All patients were risk stratified and managed according to EUA guidelines then followed by a surveillance regimen per 3 months for 6 months. RESULTS: The study included 23 patients with a mean age of 53 ± 15.8 years. While 15 patients (65%) had a single tumor, the rest had multiple tumors, ranging from 2 to 3 in number with a total of 36 lesions. No cases required conversion to cTURBT and none of them experienced obturator nerve reflex or bladder perforation. Only one patient (4.3%) had an attack of clot urine retention. The mean hospitalization time was 31.2 ± 14.4 h and the mean catheterization time was 20.4 ± 13.3 h. The Detrusor muscle was present in 20 patients (87%) and the remaining 3 patients required a re-staging cystoscopy which was performed efficiently using thulium laser. None of the treated patients developed tumour recurrence during the follow-up period. In analysis, the duration of complete resection of 2-4 cm tumours was 23-27 min after the 7th case with a resection rate of 0.12-0.15 cm/min. CONCLUSION: TmL-ERBT is safe and feasible for complete resection of NMIBC with a short learning curve and adequate cancer control.

Development of a dynamic risk system for predicting the risk of recurrence and progression in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer after thulium laser resection of bladder tumor or transurethral resection of bladder tumor followed by intravesical BCG instillation.

Background: The high recurrence rate of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) after tumor resection brings huge physical and financial burdens for patients. Several predictive models that predict the recurrence of patients with NMIBC have drawbacks in clinical practice. With the rapid development of therapeutic methods, more factors should be taken into consideration when constructing predictive model. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 90 patients who were diagnosed as intermediate- or high-risk NMIBC and received a Thulium laser resection of bladder tumor (TmLRBT) or transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by BCG instillation. Univariate Cox regression analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed to screen out the independent prognostic factors of recurrence free survival (RFS). A nomogram and risk index were constructed using these prognostic factors. Results: In this study, 22 patients suffered recurrence; 37 patients (41%) received TmLRBT, and over 90% patients completed intravesical BCG instillation for one year. The univariate Cox regression showed that surgery (TURBT vs TmLRBT), previous bladder tumor, tumor number, pathological stage, post-operative catheterization and number of BCG therapy were associated with RFS. The multivariate Cox regression revealed that surgery (TURBT vs TmLRBT) (HR = 3.16, 95%CI [1.02 - 9.83]); previous bladder tumor (HR = 4.03, 95%CI [1.41 - 11.54]); number of BCG therapy (HR = 0.89, 95%CI [0.84 - 0.95]) were independent prognostic factors. A nomogram was constructed and exhibited excellent capability in predicting the RFS with an AUC of 0.789, 0.848, 0.806 at 6-, 12- and 24-months respectively and a c-index of 0.822. Also, the calibration curve and decision curve analysis were performed to verify the predictive efficacy. The risk index was derived from the nomogram and also exhibited favorable capability in predicting the progression free survival (PFS) of patients. Conclusions: Patients who received TmLRBT, without previous bladder tumor history and had more intravesical BCG instillations are likely to have better RFS. The nomogram and the risk index which were constructed to predict the RFS and PFS of patients may help urologists to make clinical decisions and aid in precision medicine.

Percutaneous transhepatic endoscopic thulium laser vaporesection for management of severe and focal benign biliary strictures.

Background: Biliary lithiasis and strictures in the bile ducts have a causality. Dilation or stent placement is routinely used to treat strictures but fibrosis can lead to their recurrence. Thulium laser vaporesection with percutaneous transhepatic endoscopy is a novel therapeutic modal-ity for managing severe, focal benign biliary strictures (BBSs). There are few reports about this method of treating BBSs. Our study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of this technique. Methods: Fifteen patients (six males and nine females) with BBSs underwent stricture ablation with thulium laser via percutaneous transhepatic endoscopy. The immediate and short-term technical success and complication rates were evaluated. Results: Biliary strictures appeared in segmental branches of two patients, in the left or right hepatic duct of twelve patients, and in the common bile duct of one patient. The immediate and short-term technical success rates of the thulium laser procedure were 100%. The lumen of the strictures measured 1-3 mm before the procedure and improved to 4-5 mm in six (40%) patients, 5-10 mm in five (33.3%) patients, and 10-15 mm in four (26.7%) patients after the procedure. No mortality and major procedure-related complications were observed. One patient experienced a minor complication (hemobilia). Conclusions: Percutaneous transhepatic endoscopic thulium laser ablation appears to be safe and effective for treating short-segment BBSs. However, further studies with large samples and long follow-up periods are necessary to fully determine the long-term outcomes of this technique.

Perioperative Outcome of Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate versus Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate and compare clinical safety and efficiency of Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) for the treatment of large gland benign prostatic hyperplasia in a tertiary care center. METHODS: Perioperative data of 39 patients who underwent RASP in our institution from 2015 to 2021 was collected. Propensity score matching using prostate volume, patient age, and body mass index (BMI) was performed from a database of 1,100 Patients treated by ThuLEP from 2009 to 2021. A total of 76 patients were matched. Preoperative parameters such as BMI, age, and prostate volume, as well as intra- and postoperative parameters such as operation time, resection weight, transfusion rate, postoperative catheterization time, length of hospital stay (LoS), hemoglobin drop, postoperative urinary retention (PUR), Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC), and the Combined Complication Index (CCI), were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no difference in mean hemoglobin drop (2.2 vs. 1.9 g/dL, p = 0.34), yet endoscopic surgery showed superiority in mean operation time (109 vs. 154 min, p < 0.001), mean postoperative catheterization time (3.3 vs. 7.2 days, p < 0.001), and mean LOS (5.4 vs. 8.4 days, p < 0.001). Complication rates evaluated by CDC (p = 0.11) and CCI (p = 0.89) were similar in both groups. Within the documented complications, transfusion rate (0 vs. 3, p = 0.08) and the occurrence of PUR (1 vs. 2, p = 0.5) showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: ThuLEP and RASP show similar perioperative efficacy and a low rate of complications. ThuLEP had shorter operation times, shorter catheterization time, and a shorter LoS.

Thulium laser vaporesection of prostates with volume exceeding 100 cm3 as an alternative to HoLEP and ThuLEP.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of thulium laser vaporesection of prostates with volume exceeding 100 cm3. In the present prospective study, patients with infra-vesical urinary obstruction due to a prostate with volume exceeding 100 cm3 underwent endoscopic vaporesection using thulium laser. In this procedure, prostate chips were resected without morcellation. The technical aspects of surgery, admission time, post-operative catheter time and post-operative complications were analyzed. Flowmetry was performed combined with prostatic ultrasound in the follow-up. Between March 2010 and November 2018, 156 cases with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; volume >100 cm3) were treated. The mean patient age was 67.8 years (48.4-86.6 years), and the mean prostatic volume was 137 cm3 (100-436 cm3). The mean length of hospitalization was 1.48 days (1-8 days), and the mean post-operative catheter time was 5.1 (1-17). Three cases (1.9%) required readmission due to hematuria. The mean follow-up time was 31.2 months (standard deviation = 27.7). Urethral stricture was observed in 14 cases (9%), with bulbar urethra being the most frequent finding. Urinary tract infection was observed in 11 cases (7.1%), and urinary incontinence was observed in 5 cases. The mean peak urinary flow at 12 and 24 months was 26.9 ± 12.5 and 23.9 ± 11.7 ml/s, respectively, and the mean urinary flow during the final follow-up at 41 months was 21.6 ml/s. Thulium laser vaporesection is a valid alternative to open prostatectomy, HoLEP and ThuLEP in patients with large BPH. Urinary flow remained elevated throughout the follow-up.