An in-vitro three-dimensional surgical simulation technique to predict tibial tunnel length in transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: During the transtibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, drilling depth excessively longer than the tibial tunnel length (TTL) is an important reason to cause popliteal neurovascular bundle injury when preparing the tibial tunnel. This study aims to develop an in-vitro three-dimensional surgical simulation technique to determine the TTL in anteromedial (AM) and anterolateral (AL) approaches. METHODS: A total of 63 knees' 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography models were included in this study. The SuperImage system was used to reconstruct the 3D knee model and locate the tibial PCL site. The established 3D knee model and the coordinates of the tibial PCL site were imported into Rhinoceros 3D modeling software to simulate AM and AL tibial tunnel approaches with different tibial tunnel angles (TTA). The TTL and the tibial tunnel height (TTH) were measured in this study. RESULTS: In AM and AL tibial tunnel approaches, the TTL showed a strong correlation with the TTA (for AM: r = 0.758, p < 0.001; for AL: r = 0.727, p < 0.001). The best fit equation to calculate the TTL based on the TTA was Y = 1.04X + 14.96 for males in AM approach, Y = 0.93X + 17.76 for males in AL approach, Y = 0.92X + 14.4 for females in AM approach, and Y = 0.94X + 10.5 for females in AL approach. CONCLUSION: Marking the TTL on the guide pin or reamer could help to avoid the drill bit over-penetrated into the popliteal space to damage the neurovascular structure.

Use of Unidirectional Porous ß-Tricalcium Phosphate in the Tibial Tunnel for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Case Series.

Bone defects in the tibial tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can cause adverse events. The unidirectional porous tricalcium ß-phosphate (UDPTCP) has the potential to be used as a filling substitute for bone defects. In this case series, we present the first nine cases in which UDPTCP was used as a bone substitute in the tibial tunnel during ACL reconstruction. The patients comprised six males and three females, with an average age of 32 years (range: 16-50 years). A cylindrical UDPTCP measuring 10 x 20 mm was molded to fit the tibial tunnel and then implanted. At the one-year postoperative follow-up, none of the patients demonstrated any complications, and bone remodeling was observed on radiographs. Therefore, UDPTCP may provide a safe and reliable filling substitute for the tibial tunnel in ACL reconstruction.

Accurate tibial tunnel position in transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears delays the progression of medial joint space narrowing.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the association between the progression of medial joint space (MJS) narrowing, medial meniscus extrusion (MME) and clinical scores and the tibial tunnel position in pullout repairs for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs). METHODS: This retrospective study examined 54 patients. Changes in MJS (ΔMJS), MME (ΔMME) and clinical scores and their relationship with the tibial tunnel position were evaluated using correlation coefficients. The distance from the anatomical to technical attachment position in the tibial tunnel position was measured in the anterior and medial directions, and the direct distance was measured using the Pythagorean theorem. RESULTS: The mean ΔMJS and ΔMME were 0.6 ± 0.8 and 1.3 ± 1.3 mm, respectively, and the mean anterior, medial and direct distances were 1.4 ± 2.3, 2.2 ± 1.7 and 3.4 ± 1.7 mm, respectively. ΔMJS had a significant positive correlation with the medial (r = 0.580, p < 0.001) and direct (r = 0.559, p < 0.001) distances, while ΔMME had a significant positive correlation with direct distance (r = 0.295, p = 0.030). Several clinical scores were significantly negatively correlated with these distances. CONCLUSION: In transtibial pullout repair for MMPRTs, accurate tibial tunnel position delayed the progression of MJS narrowing and MME, leading to improved clinical outcomes. The progression of MJS narrowing was associated with the mediolateral direction of the tibial tunnel position, while the clinical scores were associated with the anteroposterior direction of the tibial tunnel position. These findings indicate the need to orient the tip of the guide in a more posterolateral direction when creating the tibial tunnel. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

The tibial capsular reflection and septum in posterior compartment are safe and reliable soft-tissue landmark for tibial tunnel drilling in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To investigate the validity of using tibial capsular reflection and septum in the posterior compartment as landmark during posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction (PCLR). METHODS: Anatomic measurements were obtained for 12 fresh human cadaveric knee specimens to observe the spatial position of the tibial insertion of the PCL in relation to the posterior septum and the capsular reflection in the posterior compartment. Sixty patients who underwent reconstruction of the PCL between 2020 and 2023 were also retrospectively investigated. The tibial tunnel was replaced in all patients using the same method (with reference to the tibial capsular reflection and the posterior septum). The placement of the tibial tunnel was assessed using X-ray fluoroscopy intraoperatively and computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction postoperatively. RESULTS: All fibres in the tibial insertion of the PCL in the 12 cadaveric specimens were located in the posteromedial compartment, adjacent to the posterior septum. The inferior border of the PCL insertion is adjacent to the tibial capsular reflection, which is attached at the champagne glass drop-off of the posterior tibia. In our previous cases, none of the patients experienced postoperative or intraoperative complications such as neurovascular injury, and the angle between the pin and the PCL facet was 93.1 ± 3.9° as measured on intraoperative radiographs. The mean distance from the centre of the tibial tunnel outlet to the inferior border of the PCL insertion was 5.6 ± 1.1 mm, and the distance from the centre of the tibial tunnel outlet to the outer border of the PCL insertion as a percentage of the length of the inferior border of PCL insertion was 42.2 ± 6.3%. CONCLUSION: The tibial capsular reflection and septum in the posterior compartment are safe and reliable soft-tissue landmark for tibial tunnel drilling in PCLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level Ⅳ.

Anatomic versus Low Tibial Tunnel in Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

There is currently no consensus on the optimal placement of the tibial tunnel for double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of double-bundle PCL reconstruction utilizing anatomic versus low tibial tunnels. We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving patients who underwent double-bundle PCL reconstruction between Jan 2019 and Jan 2022, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years (n = 36). Based on the tibial tunnel position on postoperative computed tomography, patients were categorized into two groups: anatomic placement (group A; n = 18) and low tunnel placement (group L; n = 18). We compared the range of motion, stability test, complications, and side-to-side differences in tibial posterior translation using kneeling stress radiography between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding clinical outcomes or complication rates. No significant differences in the posterior drawer test and side-to-side difference on kneeling stress radiography (2.5 ± 1.2 mm in group A vs. 3.7 ± 2.0 mm in group L; p = 0.346). In conclusion, the main findings of this study indicate that both anatomic tunnel and low tibial tunnel placements in double-bundle PCL reconstruction demonstrated comparable and satisfactory clinical and radiologic outcomes, with similar overall complication rates at the 2-year follow-up.

Outcome Analysis of Arthroscopic Fixation of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fracture Using a Single Tibial Tunnel and Suture Loop with Button Configuration - A Case Series Study.

Introduction: A prospective case series study to analyze the outcome of arthroscopic fixation of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fracture using a single tibial tunnel and suture loop with button configuration technique. PCL avulsion fracture injury requires surgical treatment to restore PCL function and stability of the knee joint. Several open and arthroscopic procedures require a steep learning curve are followed to treat these injuries; yet, our technique is a simpler technique with desirable outcomes and does not require a long learning curve. Hence, it is reported. Case Series: Ten patients with the same ethnic background having avulsed PCL injury since 2015 underwent arthroscopic fixation of avulsed PCL with single tibial tunnel and suture loop with button configuration within 3 months of injury are studied prospectively till date. All patients are clinically and radiologically evaluated with varied parameters. Postoperatively structured rehabilitation protocol is followed for all the patients. Post-operative clinical and radiological assessments are done and analyzed in 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years. Discussion: Ten patients were available for follow-up for a period of 6 months-3 years. Outcome analysis at the end of 3 years for all patients showed definitive improvement in the function of the knee statistically and functionally. Conclusion: For patients with PCL avulsion fracture, arthroscopic fixation of PCL with a single tibial tunnel and suture loop with Endobutton configuration gives definitive results. Medium-term follow-up analysis shows no failure in the outcome.

[Comparison of intraoperative effects of computer navigation-assisted and simple arthroscopic reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament tibial tunnel].

Objective: To compare the intraoperative effects of computer navigation-assisted versus simple arthroscopic reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tibial tunnel. Methods: The clinical data of 73 patients with PCL tears who were admitted between June 2021 and June 2022 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analysed, of whom 34 cases underwent PCL tibial tunnel reconstruction with navigation-assisted arthroscopy (navigation group) and 39 cases underwent PCL tibial tunnel reconstruction with arthroscopy alone (control group). There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups, including gender, age, body mass index, side of injury, time from injury to surgery, preoperative posterior drawer test, knee range of motion (ROM), Tegner score, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score between the two groups ( P>0.05). The perioperative indicators (operation time and number of guide wire drillings) were recorded and compared between the two groups. The angle between the graft and the tibial tunnel and the exit positions of the tibial tunnel in the coronal, sagittal, and transverse planes respectively were measured on MRI at 1 day after operation. The knee ROM, Tegner score, Lysholm score, and IKDC score were evaluated before operation and at last follow-up. Results: The operation time in the navigation group was shorter than that in the control group, and the number of intraoperative guide wire drillings was less than that in the control group, the differences were significant ( P<0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 12-17 months, with an average of 12.8 months. There was no perioperative complications such as vascular and nerve damage, deep venous thrombosis and infection of lower extremity. During the follow-up, there was no re-injuries in either group and no revision was required. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the exit positions of the tibial tunnel in the coronal, sagittal, and transverse planes between the two groups ( P>0.05), but the angle between the graft and the tibial tunnel was significantly greater in the navigation group than in the control group ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, 30, 3, 1 and 0 cases were rated as negative, 1+, 2+, and 3+ of posterior drawer test in the navigation group and 33, 5, 1, and 0 cases in the control group, respectively, which significantly improved when compared with the preoperative values ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05). At last follow-up, ROM, Tegner score, Lysholm score, and IKDC score of the knee joint significantly improved in both groups when compared with preoperative values ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the difference in preoperative and postoperative indicators between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion: Computer-navigated arthroscopic PCL tibial tunnel reconstruction can quickly and accurately prepare tunnels with good location and orientation, with postoperative functional scores comparable to arthroscopic PCL tibial tunnel reconstruction alone.

A modified anatomical posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique using the posterior septum and posterior capsule as landmarks to position the low tibial tunnel.

BACKGROUND: Lowering the exit position of the tibial tunnel can improve the clinical efficacy of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, however, there is no unified positioning standard. This study aimed to use novel soft tissue landmarks to create a low tunnel. METHODS: A total of 14 human cadaveric knees and 12 patients with PCL injury were included in this study. Firstly, we observed the anatomical position between the PCL, posterior septum, and other tissue, and evaluated the relationship between the center of the low tibial tunnel (SP tunnel) and posterior septum and distal reflection of posterior capsule, and using computed tomography (CT) to evaluate distance between the center of the SP tunnel with bony landmarks. Then, evaluated the blood vessels content in the posterior septum with HE staining. Finally, observed the posterior septum and distal reflection of the posterior capsule under arthroscopy to explore the clinical feasibility of creating a low tibial tunnel, and assessed the risk of surgery by using ultrasound to detect the distance between the popliteal artery and the posterior edge of tibial plateau bone cortex. RESULTS: In all 14 cadaveric specimens, the PCL tibial insertions were located completely within the posterior medial compartment of the knee. The distance between the center of the SP tunnel and the the articular surface of tibial plateau was 9.4 ± 0.4 mm. All SP tunnels retained an intact posterior wall, which was 1.6 ± 0.3 mm from the distal reflection of the posterior capsule. The distances between the center of the SP tunnel and the the articular surface of tibial plateau, the champagne glass drop-off were 9.2 ± 0.4 mm (ICC: 0.932, 95%CI 0.806-0.978) and 1.5 ± 0.2 mm (ICC:0.925, 95%CI 0.788-0.975) in CT image. Compared with the posterior capsule, the posterior septum contained more vascular structures. Last, all 12 patients successfully established low tibial tunnels under arthroscopy, and the distance between the posterior edge of tibial plateau bone cortex and the popliteal artery was 7.8 ± 0.3, 9.4 ± 0.4 and 7.4 ± 0.3 mm at 30°, 60° and 90° flexion angels after filling with water and supporting with shaver in posterior-medial compartment of knee joint. CONCLUSIONS: A modified low tibial tunnel could be established in the PCL anatomical footprint by using the posterior septum and posterior capsule as landmarks.

Serial change of femoral and tibial tunnel width after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft.

PURPOSE: To investigate progressive tunnel widening and its correlation with postoperative outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using allografts. METHODS: Sixty-five patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using a tibialis anterior allograft between 2015 and 2017 were enrolled. Femoral and tibial tunnel widths were measured on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs immediately and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Average femoral and tibial tunnel widths in AP and lateral views were calculated at three different measurement points. Tunnel widening was calculated as the difference in tunnel width immediately and 2 years postoperatively. The correlation between tunnel widening and the postoperative results was analysed. RESULTS: Tunnel width changes between immediate and 2 years postoperatively were as follows, in AP and lateral views, respectively: femur, 3.0 mm ± 1.5 mm and 2.4 mm ± 1.4 mm; and tibia, 2.8 mm ± 1.4 mm and 2.9 mm ± 1.5 mm. Femoral tunnel widths significantly increased until 1 year, but not from 1 to 2 years postoperatively. Tibial tunnel width significantly increased until 2 years postoperatively. In all tunnels, the increments in tunnel widening decreased over time. Increased knee laxity significantly correlated with greater femoral tunnel widening in AP (r = 0.346, P = 0.006) and lateral views (r = 0.261, P = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Femoral tunnel widths gradually increased until 1 year postoperatively, and tibial tunnel widths increased until 2 years after ACL reconstruction with allografts. The tunnel widening rate gradually decreased over time. Femoral tunnel widening of 3.7 mm and 3.2 mm on AP and lateral views, respectively, were the cut-off values for postoperative knee laxity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The optimal tibial tunnel placement to maximize the graft bending angle in the transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a quantitative assessment in three-dimensional computed tomography model.

Background: The graft bending angle created by the graft and the tibial tunnel has inevitably occurred during the transtibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. However, few studies quantitively analyzed this angle. This study aimed to (I) explore the optimal tibial tunnel placement to maximize the graft bending angle in the PCL reconstruction; (II) reveal the effect of the tibial tunnel placement on the graft bending angle. Methods: This was an in-vitro surgical simulation study based on the three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT). A total of 55 patients who took CT scanning for knee injuries were selected (April 2020 to January 2022) from the local hospital database for review. The 3D knee models were established on the Mimics software based on the knees' CT data. Using the Rhinoceros software to simulate the transtibial PCL reconstruction on the 3D CT knee model. The anteromedial and anterolateral tibial tunnel approaches were simulated with different tibial tunnel angle. The graft bending angle and tibial tunnel length (TTL) with different tibial tunnel angles were quantitively analyzed. Results: The graft bending angle in anterolateral approach with a 50° tibial tunnel angle was significantly greater than it in anteromedial approach with a 60° tibial tunnel angle (P<0.001). There was no difference of the graft bending angle between the anterolateral approach with a 40° tibial tunnel angle and the anteromedial approach with a 60° tibial tunnel angle (P>0.05). The graft bending angle showed a strong correlation with the tibial tunnel angle (for anteromedial approach: r=0.759, P<0.001; for anterolateral approach: r=0.702, P<0.001). The best-fit equation to calculate the graft bending angle based on the tibial tunnel angle was Y = 0.89*X + 59.05 in anteromedial tibial tunnel approach (r2=0.576), and was Y = 0.78*X + 80.21 anterolateral tibial tunnel approach (r2=0.493). Conclusions: The graft bending angle and TTL will significantly increase as the tibial tunnel angle becomes greater. Maximizing the tibial tunnel angle (50° tibial tunnel angle) in the anterolateral approach could provide the greatest graft bending angle in the PCL reconstruction. No matter how the tibial tunnel angle is changed in the anteromedial approach, using anterolateral approach might reduce the killer turn effect more effectively than using anteromedial approach.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Arthroscopic Ligamentoplasty Using the Four-Strand Hamstring Technique.

In this study, we looked at the clinical outcomes of individuals who had a symptomatic torn anterior cruciate ligament and had their anterior cruciate ligament repaired using a four-strand hamstring (4SHS) tendon autograft at least two years later. This is a retrospective study of 34 cases of anterior cruciate ligament arthroscopic reconstruction using the four-strand hamstring graft, collected from Traumatology and Orthopedics at Cheikh Khalifa Hospital in Casablanca, Morocco between January 2017 and January 2021. Different surgeons performed the operations. Physical findings and functional scores were recorded before the follow-up physical examination and surgery; thus, knee radiographs have been evaluated. A six-month rehabilitation program was devised following surgery. The average age of the patients was 30 years, with a male predominance of 94%. Thirty patients (88%) reported negative pivot shift tests and the Lachman test. The average Lysholm score enhanced from 59.3 before surgery to 85.29 at the time of the assessment. Three patients (8.82%) with a positive pivot shift test had no background of extra knee damage. In comparison to the appearance on the preoperative radiographs, no proof of progressive degenerative deterioration was found on the follow-up radiographs. All of the patients, however, had tunnel extension. The tibial tunnel grew on average by 18%, while the femoral tunnel grew on average by 30%. In 88% of patients assessed at least two years after surgery, ligamentoplasty of the anterior cruciate ligament using the four-strand hamstring graft eradicated anterior tibial subluxation. The failure rate was overall 10%. The functional knee scores had greatly improved at the time of the follow-up.

The "N+10 Rule" to Avoid Graft-Tunnel Mismatch in Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone ACL Reconstruction Using Independent Femoral Tunnel Drilling.

Background: Graft-tunnel mismatch (GTM) is a common problem in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) grafts. Hypothesis: Application of the "N+10 rule" in endoscopic ACLR with BPTB grafts will result in acceptable tibial tunnel length (TTL), minimizing GTM. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Endoscopic BPTB ACLR was conducted on the paired knees of 10 cadaveric specimens using 2 independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques-accessory anteromedial portal and flexible reamer. The graft bone blocks were trimmed to 10 × 20 mm, and the intertendinous distance (represented by "N") between the bone blocks was measured. The N+10 rule was used to set the angle of the ACL tibial tunnel guide to the appropriate number of degrees for drilling. The amount of excursion or recession of the tibial bone plug in relation to the anterior tibial cortical aperture was measured in both flexion and extension. A GTM threshold of ±7.5 mm was set based on prior studies. Results: The mean BPTB ACL intertendinous distance was 47.5 ± 5.5 mm. The mean measured intra-articular distance was 27.2 ± 3 mm. Using the N+10 rule, the mean total (flexion plus extension) GTM was 4.3 ± 3.2 mm (GTM in flexion, 4.9 ± 3.6 mm; GTM in extension, 3.8 ± 3.5 mm). In 18 of 20 (90%) cadaveric knees, the mean total GTM fell within the ±7.5-mm threshold. When comparing the actual measured TTL to the calculated TTL, there was a mean difference of 5.4 ± 3.9 mm. When comparing femoral tunnel drilling techniques, the total GTM for the accessory anteromedial portal technique was 2.1 ± 3.7 mm, while the total GTM for the flexible reamer technique was 3.6 ± 5.4 mm (P = .5). Conclusion: The N+10 rule resulted in an acceptable mean GTM in both flexion and extension. The mean difference between the measured versus calculated TTL using the N+10 rule was also acceptable. Clinical Relevance: The N+10 rule is a simple and effective intraoperative strategy for achieving desired TTL regardless of patient-specific factors to avoid excessive GTM in endoscopic BPTB ACLR using independent femoral tunnel drilling.

The tibial tunnel drilling angles of 60° provided a lower ultimate load to failure on a single bundle posterior cruciate ligament graft using interference screw fixation compared to 30°/45°.

PURPOSE: To biomechanically compare the initial fixation strength of grafts among three tibial tunnel angles (30°/45°/60°) in transtibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. METHODS: A series of transtibial PCL reconstruction models were established with porcine tibias and bovine tendons. Specimens were randomly assigned to three groups according to the angles between the tibial tunnel and the perpendicular line of the tibial shaft: Group A (30°, n = 12), Group B (45°, n = 12), and Group C (60°, n = 12). The area of the tunnel entrance, the segmental bone mineral density (sBMD) of the graft fixation site of the tibia and the maximum insertion torque of the interference screw were measured. Finally, load to failure tests were carried out on the graft-screw-tibia constructs at the same rate. RESULTS: Ultimate load to failure in Group C (335.2 ± 107.5 N) was significantly lower than that in Group A (584.1 ± 127.9 N, P < 0.01) and Group B (521.9 ± 95.9 N, P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between biomechanical properties of Groups A and B (n.s.). The posterior part fractures of the tibial tunnel exit occurred in eight specimens of Group C. In addition, the ultimate load was proven to be related to insertion torque (rho = 0.7, P < 0.01), sBMD (rho = 0.7, P < 0.01), and the area of the tunnel entrance (rho =- 0.4, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The ultimate load to failure was significantly lower in tibial PCL interference screw fixation for tunnels drilled at 60° compared to 30°/45°. In addition, the ultimate load was significantly correlated with insertion torque, sBMD and the area of the tunnel entrance. Given that the load to failure of distal fixation may not be sufficient for early postoperative rehabilitation, a 60° tunnel should not be recommended to drill in tibia during PCL reconstruction.

Accuracy of the newly developed Zimmer Biomet Root Aiming guide in tibial tunnel creation compared with that of conventional guides.

Background/objective: Accurate tibial tunnel creation is crucial for successful transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tears (MMPRTs). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the newly developed Zimmer Biomet Root Aiming (ZeBRA) guide for transtibial pullout repair of MMPRTs. Methods: This study included 50 patients who underwent transtibial pullout repair using the Unicorn Meniscal Root (UMR) (n = 25) and ZeBRA (n = 25) guides. The expected anatomic centre (AC) and tibial tunnel centre (TC) were assessed using three-dimensional postoperative computed tomography (CT) images. The expected AC was defined as the centre of the circle tangent to the triangular footprint of the MM posterior root. The expected AC and TC on the tibial surface were assessed using the percentage-based posterolateral location on the tibial surface. The absolute distance between the AC and TC (mm) was evaluated. Results: The mean AC location was 76.1% ± 3.1% posterior and 40.8% ± 2.1% lateral, whereas the mean TC location was 76.7% ± 5.3% posterior and 37.2% ± 3.6% lateral using the UMR guide and 75.8% ± 3.1% posterior and 36.5% ± 2.4% lateral using the ZeBRA guide. No significant difference was observed in the absolute distance between the UMR and ZeBRA guides (3.9 ± 1.4 and 3.8 ± 1.3 mm, respectively; p = 0.617). Conclusions: The newly developed ZeBRA guide allows accurate tibial tunnel creation, and its accuracy is comparable to that of the conventional UMR guide. Tibial tunnels were created at optimal positions using both guides, and the choice of the guide would depend on the surgeon's preference.

Anterior Screw Insertion Results in Greater Tibial Tunnel Enlargement Rates after Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction than Posterior Insertion: A Retrospective Study.

Background and Objectives: Tunnel enlargement (TE) is a widely reported phenomenon after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Given the paucity of knowledge in the literature, it remains unclear whether screw position in the tunnel affects TE. This retrospective cohort study evaluated differences in postoperative tunnel enlargement rates (TER) and clinical results between anterior and posterior tibial interference screw insertion during single-bundle ACLR using autologous hamstring grafts. Materials and Methods: A group of consecutive patients that underwent primary arthroscopic single-bundle ACLR in our hospital were screened and divided into two groups based on the position of the tibial interference screw (determined by Computer Tomography within 3 days after surgery): anterior screw position group (A) and posterior screw position group (B). The bone tunnel size was measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed 1 year after surgery. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were used for clinical results 1 year postoperatively. Results: 87 patients were included. The TER of Group A is higher than that of Group B (43.17% vs. 33.80%, p = 0.024). Group A showed a significant increase (12.1%) in enlargement rates at the joint line level than group B (43.77% vs. 31.67%, p = 0.004). Moreover, KOOS and IKDC scores improved in both groups. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two groups. Conclusions: One year after ACLR, patients with posterior screw showed significantly lower TE than patients with anterior screw. However, the position of screw did not lead to differences in clinical results over our follow-up period. Posterior screw position in the tibial tunnel maybe a better choice in terms of reducing TE. Whether the different screw positions affect the long-term TE and long-term clinical outcomes needs to be confirmed by further studies.

Influence of the Tibial Tunnel Angle and Posterior Tibial Slope on "Killer Turn" during Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of various posterior tibial slopes (PTSs) and tibial tunnel angles (TTAs) on "killer turn" in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction by using three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA). The study models were created using computed tomography images of a healthy young Asian male. Using SolidWorks, PCL grafts and tibial bone tunnels at different tibial drilling angles (30°, 45°, 60°) were developed. Anterior opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (aOW-HTO) was performed to evaluate the influence of the PTS (+8°, +4°, native, -4°, -8°). An FEA was performed utilizing the ANSYS software program. In the same PTS model, the peak of the equivalent Von Mises stress in PCL grafts decreased as the angle of the TTA increased. In the same TTA model, the peak of the Von Mises in PCL grafts decreased as the PTS angle increased. The "high-contact stress area" (contact stress greater than 10 MPa) was diminished when the TTA and PTS were increased. aOW-HTO was used to steepen the PTS, and a larger TTA may reduce the stress at the "killer turn" during PCL reconstruction. In conclusion, the study findings suggest that using aOW-HTO to steepen the PTS and a larger TTA may reduce the stress at the "killer turn" during PCL reconstruction. The usefulness and safety of this surgical procedure need to be evaluated in future clinical studies.

All-inside versus complete tibial tunnel techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: All-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a novel technique that has gained attention due to its minimally invasive. However, evidence surrounding the efficacy and safety between all-inside and complete tibial tunnel ACLR are lacking. Present work was aimed to compare clinical outcome for ACLR performed with an all-inside versus a complete tibial tunnel technique. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted of published literature on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines up to May 10, 2022. The outcomes included KT-1000 arthrometer ligament laxity test, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, and Knee Society Score (KSS) Scale, and tibial tunnel widening. Complications of interest extracted were graft re-ruptures and evaluated the graft re-rupture rate. Data from published RCTs meeting inclusion criteria were extracted and analyzed, and all the extracted data are pooled and analyzed by RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: A total of 8 randomized controlled trials involving 544 patients (consisting of 272 all-inside and 272 complete tibial tunnel patients) were included in the meta-analysis. We found clinical outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] subjective score: mean difference [MD], 2.22; 95% CI, 0.23-4.22; p = 0.03; Lysholm score: MD, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.25-1.93; p = 0.01; Tegner activity scale: MD, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.11-0.71; p < 0.01; Tibial Tunnel Widening: MD = - 1.92; 95% CI, - 3.58 to - 0.25; p = 0.02; knee laxity: MD = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.12-1.20; p = 0.02; and graft re-rupture rate: RR, 1.97;95% CI, 0.50-7.74; P = 0.33) in the all-inside and complete tibial tunnel group. The findings also indicated that all-inside may be more advantageous in tibial tunnel healing. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis indicated that the all-inside ACLR was superior to complete tibial tunnel ACLR in functional outcomes and tibial tunnel widening. However, the all-inside ACLR was not entirely superior to complete tibial tunnel ACLR in knee laxity measured, and graft re-rupture rate.

Surgically adjust tibial tunnel in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament single-bundle reconstruction: A time-zero biomechanical study in vitro.

BACKGROUND: The anatomical positioning of the graft during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is of great significance for restoring normal knee kinematics and preventing early joint degeneration. Therefore, the adjustment of the mispositioned guide pin becomes extremely important. Our research aims to test the time-zero biomechanical properties in adjusting inaccurate guide pins to the center of the tibial footprint in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament single-bundle reconstruction. METHODS: Porcine tibias and bovine extensor tendons were used to simulate a transtibial ACL reconstruction in vitro. Load-to failure testing was carried out in 4 groups: control group (n = 45): the guide pin was drilled at the center of the ACL footprint; group I, group II and group III (n = 45, respectively): the guide pin was respectively drilled 1 mm, 2 mm and 3 mm away from the center of the ACL footprint. In the experimental groups, a small tunnel with a 4.5 mm reamer is made and the guide pin is shifted to the center of the footprint. All the reamed tibias were scanned by CT to measure the area of the tunnel in the footprint, and time-zero biomechanical properties were recorded. RESULTS: All graft-tibia complexes failed because the grafts slipped past the interference screws. Compare to control group, the ultimate load, yield load, and tunnel exit area in group III decreased significantly (p < 0.05). Regarding to the ultimate load, yield load, tensile stiffness, twisting force and tunnel exit area, t-test showed no significant differences between control group and group I, group II respectively (p > 0.05). Pearson test showed that tunnel exit area was negatively correlated with other characteristics (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical adjustment of the guide pin to the center of the tibial footprint may have significant influence in time-zero biomechanical properties in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament single-bundle reconstruction when the adjusted tibial tunnel was significantly enlarged compare to the standard tibial tunnel.

Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic Versus Lower of Anteromedial and Anterolateral Tibial Tunnels in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: In order to reduce the "killer turn" effect, various tibial tunnels have been developed. However, few studies investigated the biomechanical effects of different tibial tunnels during PCL reconstruction. This study aims to compare the time-zero biomechanical properties of anteromedial, anterolateral, lower anteromedial, and lower anterolateral tibial tunnels in transtibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction under load-to-failure loading. METHODS: Porcine tibias and bovine extensor tendons were used to simulate in vitro transtibial PCL reconstruction. Forty bovine extensor tendons and 40 porcine tibias were randomly divided into four experimental groups: anteromedial tunnel group (AM group, n = 10), anterolateral tunnel group (AL group, n = 10), lower anteromedial tunnel group (L-AM group, n = 10), and lower anterolateral tunnel group (L-AL group, n = 10). The biomechanical test was then carried out in each group using the load-to-failure test. The ultimate load (in newtons), yield load (in newtons), tensile stiffness (in newtons per millimeter), load-elongation curve, failure mode, and tibial tunnel length (in millimeter) were recorded for each specimen. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the mean differences among the four groups. RESULTS: The biomechanical outcomes showed that there were no differences in the mean tensile stiffness and failure mode among four groups. The ultimate load and yield load of the L-AM group were significantly higher than those of other three groups (P < 0.05). For the AM group, its ultimate load is significantly higher than that of the L-AL group (P < 0.05), and its yield load is higher than that of the AL group and L-AL group (P < 0.05). However, we found no significant differences in either ultimate load or yield load between AL group and L-AL group (P > 0.05). There was significant statistical difference in the length of tibial tunnel between anatomic groups (AM and AL) and lower groups (L-AM and L-AL) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with the anteromedial, anterolateral, and lower anterolateral tibial tunnel, the lower anteromedial tibial tunnel showed better time-zero biomechanical properties including ultimate load and yield load in transtibial PCL reconstruction.

Biomechanical comparison of proximal, distal, and anatomic tibial tunnel for transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

No consensus has been reached on the optimal position of PCL tibial tunnel. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of proximal, distal and anatomic tibial tunnel in transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. An in-vitro model of transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was simulated using porcine tibias and bovine extensor tendons. Two models of biomechanical testing, load-to-failure loading, and cyclic loading, were performed in this study. The load-to-failure loading found that distal tibial tunnel resulted in greater ultimate load and yield load than the anatomic and proximal tunnel group (p < 0.05), whereas there were no significant differences in mean tensile stiffness among three groups (p > 0.05). The cyclic loading found no differences in the graft displacement at 250, 500, and 1000 cycles among three groups (p > 0.05). It was found that distal tibial tunnel showed superior ultimate load and yield load in load-to-failure loading testing compared with proximal and anatomic tibial tunnels, whereas no significant difference was found in terms of the mean displacement of the survived grafts in cyclic loading testing among three groups.