A Comparative Study of Correction of Caudal Septal Deviations.

BACKGROUND: There are multiple surgical approaches for the correction of caudal septal deviation. OBJECTIVES: To compare the surgical outcomes of the widely used techniques of correction of caudal septal deviation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study done over a period of 3 years, 36 patients with caudal septal deviation were selected and randomly divided into 3 groups of 12 each who underwent surgery by the following techniques: Group A - Swinging Door technique. Group B- Tongue-in-groove technique. Group C- The cutting and suture technique with unilateral bony batten grafting. The preoperative and postoperative (at 6 months) NOSE score, anterior rhinoscopy and subjective assessment were used to measure surgical outcomes and the techniques were compared. RESULTS: Out of the 36 patients, the mean NOSE score preoperatively and postoperatively were as follows. For Group A- 72.5 and 23.33. For Group B- 73.75 and 19.17. For Group C- 72 and 22. A significant improvement of mean 49.17, 54.58 and 50.00 with p-value of < 0.05 respectively. Anterior rhinoscopy done at 6 months postoperatively showed that 30 patients (83%) had a straight septum while 6 patients (17%) had some residual deviation. Subjective patient satisfaction was "much improved" in 17 (47.2%) patients, and "improved" in 19 (52.8%) patients. Four patients had postoperative synechia which were managed conservatively. CONCLUSION: Surgical correction of caudal septal deviation resulted in significant improvements in nasal airway. The tongue-in -groove technique was found to be the most effective among the three.

Comparison of 1 Year Nasal Tip Projection Results of Triple Cartilage Combining Suture (Flexible Tongue-in-Groove) and Classical Tongue-in-Groove Techniques.

Objectives: In the present study, we compared patient satisfaction with classical tongue-in-groove (TIG) technique and triple cartilage combining suture (TCCS; flexible tongue-in-groove) techniques applied to the nasal tip in rhinoplasty. Methods: In this retrospective study, 80 patients who underwent rhinoplasty operations with TIG or TCCS techniques applied to the tip region were included. There were 40 patients in both groups. All patients in groups 1 and 2 were evaluated by the criteria written below at preoperative, postoperative first month, and postoperative first year: (1) Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation Questionnaire (ROE), (2) tip projection (cm), (3) nasal dorsum length (cm), (4) tip projection ratio (Goode), (5) nasofrontal angle, and (6) nasolabial angle. Results: The patients were followed up at 84.32 ± 19.38 months in the TIG group and 87.47 ± 18.01 months in the TCCS group. Our results showed that preoperative, postoperative first-month, and first-year tip projection (P = .013, P = .022, and P = .020, respectively), and nasal dorsum length values (P = .009, P = .020, and P = .020, respectively) of the TCCS group were significantly lower than those in the TIG group. There was a positive correlation between the postoperative first month and postoperative first year ROE scores. Lower preoperative tip projection ratio (Goode) values and higher nasolabial angle values were related to higher ROE scores showing patient satisfaction. Conclusion: For the patient satisfaction after tip rhinoplasty, lower projection ratio (Goode) and higher nasolabial angle values were related to ROE scores. Although there are no significant results, lower tip projection results in the TCCS group may be related to more patient satisfaction due to natural appearance.

Different techniques for caudal extension graft placement in rhinoplasty.

INTRODUCTION: The caudal extension graft is usually a cartilage graft that overlaps the caudal margin of the nasal septum. A combination of the caudal extension graft and the tongue-in-groove technique is used to stabilize the nasal base, set tip projection, and refine the alar-columellar relationship. OBJECTIVES: In this study we present some new modifications to the placement of caudal extension grafts in rhinoplasty. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of 965 patients who underwent septorhinoplasty from June 2011 to July 2015. Of these, 457 patients required a caudal extension graft and were included in the study. Minimum follow-up was 13.2 months with a mean follow-up time of 17.4 months. RESULTS: In most cases, comparison of photographs before and after surgery were satisfactory and showed improved contour. Minor deformity was detected in 41 patients and 11 patients needed revision surgery. CONCLUSION: With these modifications the surgeon can employ the caudal extension graft even in angulated caudal septal deviations. A variety of methods have been proposed for correction of caudal nasal deviation.

The effect of the tongue in groove technique on the nasolabial angle and nasal tip projection.

BACKGROUND: The tongue in groove technique (TIG) is a useful technique for the correction of the nasal tip projection and the nasolabial angle. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of this technique for nasal tip rotation and projection correction in the Iranian society. METHODS: This is a retrospective clinical trial study of 20 patients undergoing open septo-rhinoplasty using TIG technique from January 2017 to August 2019 at the oral and maxillofacial unit of Bu Ali Hospital and private sector. Preoperative and postoperative profile view photographs were compared to assess the changes in tip projection and rotation. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (75%) had normal angular size, and 5 of them (25%) were not within the normal range after the surgery. The Fisher exact test showed that this success was statistically significant (P = 0.006). Ten patients (50%) had normal projection size, postoperatively. The Fisher exact test showed that this effect was statistically significant (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the benefit of TIG on the correction of nasal tip projection and rotation.