Effect of Pulmonary Hypertension on Survival Outcomes in Patients With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the effect of pulmonary hypertension (PH) on survival in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The present study was conducted according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from January 1, 2015, to March 10, 2024. Outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included early and late all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Total 15 studies were integrated into the pooled analysis to assess the impact of PH on outcomes among patients undergoing TAVR, comprising a total sample size of 35,732 individuals. The pooled prevalence of PH stood at 52.57% (n=18,767). Predominantly, the studies were conducted in the United States (n=6), followed by Germany (n=3), with one study each from Japan, Italy, Switzerland, Brazil, Poland, and Australia. Pooled analysis showed that risk of short-term mortality was greater in patients with PH compared to patients without PH (risk ratio (RR): 1.46, 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.80). Risk of long-term mortality was greater in patients with PH (RR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.29 to 1.55). Risk of cardiovascular mortality was also greater in patients with PH compared to patients without PH (RR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.36 to 2.02). We advocate for further research to address gaps in understanding different types of PH and their impacts on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes.

Left versus right ventricular pacing during TAVR and balloon aortic valvuloplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: While right ventricular pacing (RVP) is the conventional temporary pacing modality used for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), this approach possesses inherent risks and procedural challenges. We aim to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of left ventricular pacing (LVP) and RVP during TAVR and balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV). METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in four databases from inception to December 15th, 2023. We included observational studies and clinical trials comparing LVP with RVP during TAVR and BAV procedures. Primary outcomes included short-term mortality, mortality due to cardiac tamponade, and procedural complications including bleeding, vascular complications, and cardiac tamponade. Secondary outcomes comprised procedure duration and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Five studies involving 830 patients with RVP and 1577 with LVP were included. Short-term mortality was significantly higher in the RVP group (RR 2.32, 95% CI: [1.37-3.93], P = .002), as was the incidence of cardiac tamponade (RR 2.19, 95% CI: [1.11-4.32], P = .02). LVP demonstrated shorter hospital stays (MD = 1.34 d, 95% CI: [0.90, 1.78], P < .001) and reduced procedure duration (MD = 7.75 min, 95% CI: [5.08, 10.41], P < .00001) compared to RVP. New pacemaker implantation was higher in the RVP group (RR 2.23, 95% CI: [1.14, 4.39], P = .02). CONCLUSION: LVP during TAVR and BAV emerges a safer alternative to RVP, offering reduced mortality, hospital stays, and procedure durations.

Trial Designs A44002PZS Electronic Physician Notification to Facilitate the Recognition and Management of Severe Aortic Stenosis: Rationale, design, and methods of the randomized controlled DETECT AS Trial.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis causes substantial morbidity and mortality when left untreated, yet recent data suggest its undertreatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of electronic physician notification to facilitate the guideline-directed management of patients with severe aortic stenosis. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that patients with severe aortic stenosis who are in the care of physicians who receive the notification are more likely to undergo aortic valve replacement within 1-year. METHODS/DESIGN: The Electronic Physician Notification to Facilitate the Recognition and Management of Severe Aortic Stenosis (DETECT AS) trial is a randomized controlled trial and quality improvement initiative designed to evaluate the efficacy of electronic provider notification versus usual clinical care in the management of patients with severe aortic stenosis. Providers ordering an echocardiogram with findings potentially indicative of severe aortic stenosis, defined by an aortic valve area ≤1.0 cm2, are randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive electronic notification (intervention) or usual care. Providers in the notification arm are sent a notification within the electronic health record inbox outlining customized guideline recommendations for the management of patients with severe aortic stenosis based on the 2020 ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guidelines for Valvular Heart Diseases for the index and all subsequent echocardiograms. Providers in the control arm receive no notification. Randomization continues until 940 patients have been enrolled. SETTING: Multi-centered, academic health system OUTCOMES: The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with severe AS receiving an aortic valve replacement within 1-year of the index echocardiogram. Secondary endpoints include mortality, heart failure hospitalization, transthoracic echocardiogram utilization/surveillance, aortic stenosis billing code diagnosis, and cardiology/Heart Valve Team referral. CONCLUSION: The DETECT AS trial will provide insight into whether electronic notification of providers on the presence of severe aortic stenosis and associated clinical guideline recommendations will facilitate recognition and guideline-directed management of severe aortic stenosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05230225, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05230225.

Mitral complex geometric changes aggravate mitral stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) often coexists with mitral valve stenosis (MS). MS aggravation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is common, and its etiology is multifactorial. We hypothesized that geometric changes in the mitral complex (mitral valvular and annular deformities) are adjunctive factors aggravating MS after TAVR, particularly in older adults with a smaller left ventricle (LV). This study aimed to evaluate the mitral complex geometric changes before and after TAVR and to assess the important predictors of MS aggravation after TAVR. This retrospective study enrolled consecutive adult patients who underwent TAVR and surgical AVR (SAVR) for severe AS. The mitral valve area (MVA), the angle between the anterior mitral valve leaflet (AMVL) and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), AMVL length, mitral annular diameter, presence of mitral annular calcification, and LV size were evaluated using transthoracic echocardiography. This study included 258 patients who underwent TAVR and SAVR. MVA index decreased from 2.3 ± 0.6 cm² to 1.9 ± 0.5 cm² in the TAVR group. The angle between the AMVL and LVOT was 56.3 ± 9.7° preoperatively and increased to 67.3 ± 11.5° after TAVR. In multivariate analysis, the most important predictive factors of MS aggravation after TAVR were a smaller mitral annular diameter, restricted AMVL mobility, and implantation depth (odds ratio: 4.5, 5.3,3.0; 95% confidence interval: 1.6-14, 1.9-17, 1.0-8.9; and p = 0.005, p = 0.001, p = 0.042, respectively). The reduction in MVA after TAVR was related to the restriction of AMVL opening, depth of implantation and narrowing of the mitral annulus.

Prognostic value of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity changes post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) offers a solution, especially for high-risk aortic stenosis (AS) patients. However, patient outcomes post-TAVR show variability, highlighting the need for reliable prognostic indicators. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), a measure of arterial stiffness, may predict outcomes post-TAVR. This study aims to explore baPWV's prognostic value in relation to all-cause mortality post-TAVR. This study prospectively enrolled 212 severe AS patients undergoing TAVR between September 2015 and December 2021, focusing on pre- and post-TAVR baPWV measurements to explore associations with all-cause mortality. Of the 212 patients (119 females, 93 males, mean age 85 years), post-TAVR baPWV increased significantly from 1589 ± 376 to 2010 ± 521 cm/s (p < 0.001). Aortic valve (AV) peak velocity and mean pressure gradient decreased, while AV area increased, indicating procedural success. Despite this, 88% of patients experienced an increase in baPWV, with higher pre-procedure AV peak velocity and mean pressure gradient identified as predictors of increased baPWV post-TAVR. Over 23 months, 29 patients (14%) reached the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality. Notably, changes in baPWV, rather than baseline values, were significantly associated with event-free survival (HR: 0.64 per 1SD increase, p = 0.009). The study highlights the prognostic value of baPWV changes post-TAVR in predicting patient outcomes. Elevated baPWV post-TAVR may reflect a beneficial adaptation to altered hemodynamics, suggesting the need for individualized patient evaluation and the integration of baPWV measurements into clinical practice for improved post-TAVR management.

A Comprehensive Evaluation of the NAVITOR Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has undergone significant advancements in the last two decades, expanding its indications and refining transcatheter heart valve (THV) and delivery system designs to improve procedural success and patient outcomes. This review focuses on the Navitor™ valve, a third-generation intra-annular Portico™ valve (Abbott Structural Heart, St Paul, MN, USA) designed to address TAVR complications, particularly paravalvular leak (PVL). We present an overview of the Navitor™ system, comparing it to the first-generation Portico™ THV in terms of THV design, key iterations and clinical outcomes. The Navitor™ THV introduces two key refinements-a protective outer sealing skirt and a more flexible delivery system. These enhancements have led to a significant reduction in 30 day PVL rates, from 6.3% with the first-generation Portico™ to 0% with the Navitor™ system. Additionally, the Navitor™ system exhibited lower rates of severe bleeding (27.3% versus 13.1%) and major vascular complications (5.8% versus 0.7%) compared with the first-generation Portico™. The Navitor™ valve represents a promising advancement in TAVR technology, with notable reductions in complications such as PVL, severe bleeding, and major vascular issues, compared with its predecessor. While further research is needed to assess long-term durability, these results underscore its potential benefits in enhancing patient outcomes and reducing complications. This review provides insights into the evolving landscape of TAVR technology and its quantifiable impact on patient care.

Retrograde Aortic Valve Migration During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Regurgitation: A Case Report Highlighting the Importance of Prompt Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) Initiation.

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is the recommended curative treatment for pure native aortic regurgitation (AR). However, some patients are not suitable for SAVR due to comorbidities or frailty. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been reported to offer a better prognosis than medical therapy in AR patients; thus, the use of TAVR for AR may increase in the future. However, the reduced calcification and annulus ring stiffness associated with TAVR may increase the risk of valve migration. Accumulating data on rescue measures in the event of valve migration is necessary. An 87-year-old female with a history of hypertension and persistent atrial fibrillation presented to our emergency department with dyspnea. The patient was diagnosed with congestive heart failure class IV, according to the New York Heart Association classification, necessitating urgent admission to our cardiac department. Due to the patient's high surgical risk (Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score 9.17%, Euro2 score 9.55%, frailty 6), the heart team performed TAVR with a right femoral arterial approach. The patient was sedated, and pacing was initiated at 180 bpm. We placed an Edwards SAPIEN 3 valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) #23 (-1 mL volume, with attached balloon). During the post-deployment procedure, the aortic valve migrated retrogradely into the left ventricle (LV). Despite the occurrence of severe aortic valve regurgitation, the patient's vital signs remained stable. Five minutes after the migration of the aortic valve, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) was initiated. A second TAVR valve implantation was then performed. However, after the second valve implantation and the removal of the pre-shaped guidewire (Safari2 pre-shaped guidewire extra small, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA), the migrated valve became stuck in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) in a reverse position, resulting in severely limited left ventricular ejection. We increased the support provided by VA-ECMO, and surgical conversion to SAVR was performed without experiencing circulatory collapse. Surgical aortic valve replacement was initiated successfully, and withdrawal of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was performed without complications. The patient was extubated on the first postoperative day (POD), discharged from the ICU on POD 3, and transferred for rehabilitation on POD 27. In summary, the prompt introduction of VA-ECMO was important for avoiding complications and saving the patient's life following the retrograde migration of the TAVR valve.

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty bridge to transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with worse in-hospital mortality.

BACKGROUND: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has gained renewed interest as a bridge to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for patients with aortic stenosis (AS). However, it is unclear whether they patients should undergo TAVR directly or receive a staged bridge to BAV before TAVR is unclear. We used a national database to examine the association between BAV and TAVR in patients with TAVR and its effect on in-hospital mortality. METHODS: Using the nationwide inpatient database of the Japanese registry of all cardiac and vascular diseases and the combination of the diagnosis procedure combination, we retrospectively analyzed 27,600 patients with AS who underwent TAVR between October 2013 and March 2021. Outcomes of the direct TAVR group (n = 27,387) were compared with those of the BAV bridge to TAVR group (n = 213), which received BAV at least 1 day before TAVR. RESULTS: The median age was 85 (interquartile range: 82-88) years, with 33.3% (n = 9188) being male. Unplanned/emergent admissions increased with TAVR, whereas the use of BAV bridge to TAVR decreased. The in-hospital mortality rate was 1.3% and decreased over time. However, the BAV bridge to TAVR had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality than direct TAVR (5.6% vs. 1.3%; p < .0001). Factors associated with in-hospital mortality included age, body mass index, chronic renal disease, percutaneous coronary intervention, and BAV bridge to TAVR. CONCLUSIONS: In unplanned/emergent and planned admission settings, the in-hospital mortality rate for BAV bridge to TAVR is worse than that for direct TAVR. Practical criteria for BAV bridge to TAVR should be proposed to improve outcomes.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) now represents the mainstay of treatment for severe aortic stenosis. Owing to its exceptional procedural efficacy and safety, TAVI has been extended to include patients at lower surgical risk, thus now encompassing a diverse patient population receiving this treatment. Yet, long-term outcomes also depend on optimal medical therapy for secondary vascular prevention, with antithrombotic therapy serving as the cornerstone. Leveraging data from multiple randomized controlled trials, the current guidelines generally recommend single antithrombotic therapy, with either single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or oral anticoagulation (OAC) alone in those patients without or with atrial fibrillation, respectively. Yet, individualization of this pattern, as well as specific case uses, may be needed based on individual patient characteristics and concurrent procedures. This review aims to discuss the evidence supporting antithrombotic treatments in patients treated with TAVI, indications for a standardized treatment, as well as specific considerations for an individualized approach to treatment.

A Neuronal Network-Based Score Predicting Survival in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Intervention: The ABC-AS Score.

Background: Despite being the most commonly performed valvular intervention, risk prediction for aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis by currently used risk scores remains challenging. The study aim was to develop a biomarker-based risk score by means of a neuronal network. Methods: In this multicenter study, 3595 patients were divided into test and validation cohorts (70% to 30%) by random allocation. Input variables to develop the ABC-AS score were age, the cardiac biomarker high-sensitivity troponin T, and a patient history of cardiac decompensation. The validation cohort was used to verify the scores' value and for comparison with the Society of Thoracic Surgery Predictive Risk of Operative Mortality score. Results: Receiver operating curves demonstrated an improvement in prediction by using the ABC-AS score compared to the Society of Thoracic Surgery Predictive Risk of Operative Mortality (STS prom) score. Although the difference in predicting cardiovascular mortality was most notable at 30-day follow-up (area under the curve of 0.922 versus 0.678), ABC-AS also performed better in overall follow-up (0.839 versus 0.699). Furthermore, univariate analysis of ABC-AS tertiles yielded highly significant differences for all-cause (p < 0.0001) and cardiovascular mortality (p < 0.0001). Head-to-head comparison between both risk scores in a multivariable cox regression model underlined the potential of the ABC-AS score (HR per z-unit 2.633 (95% CI 2.156-3.216), p < 0.0001), while the STS prom score failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.226). Conclusions: The newly developed ABC-AS score is an improved risk stratification tool to predict cardiovascular outcomes for patients undergoing aortic valve intervention.

Comparison of Patient Outcomes Between Leadless vs Transvenous Pacemakers Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Evidence is limited regarding the effectiveness of leadless pacemaker implantation for conduction disturbance following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the national trends in the use of leadless pacemaker implantation following TAVR and compare its performance with transvenous pacemakers. METHODS: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged ≥65 years who underwent leadless or transvenous pacemakers following TAVR between 2017 and 2020 were included. Outcomes included in-hospital overall complications as well as midterm (up to 2 years) all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization, infective endocarditis, and device-related complications. Propensity score overlap weighting analysis was used. RESULTS: A total of 10,338 patients (730 leadless vs 9,608 transvenous) were included. Between 2017 and 2020, there was a 3.5-fold increase in the proportion of leadless pacemakers implanted following TAVR. Leadless pacemaker recipients had more comorbidities, including atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease. After adjusting for potential confounders, patients with leadless pacemakers experienced a lower rate of in-hospital overall complications compared with patients who received transvenous pacemakers (7.2% vs 10.1%; P = 0.014). In the midterm, we found no significant differences in all-cause death (adjusted HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.96-1.32; P = 0.15), heart failure hospitalization (subdistribution HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.74-1.08; P = 0.24), or infective endocarditis (subdistribution HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.44-2.17; P = 0.95) between the 2 groups, but leadless pacemakers were associated with a lower risk of device-related complications (subdistribution HR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.21-0.64; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Leadless pacemakers are increasingly being used for conduction disturbance following TAVR and were associated with a lower rate of in-hospital complications and midterm device-related complications compared to transvenous pacemakers without a difference in midterm mortality.

Prognostic value of CT body composition analysis for 1-year mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the value of body composition indices derived from pre-procedural computed tomography (CT) in predicting 1-year mortality among patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed consecutive patients who underwent TAVR between June 2016 and December 2021 at a single academic medical center. Skeletal muscle and subcutaneous fat area at the T4, T12, and L3 levels on pre-procedural CT were measured. The association between body composition and 1-year mortality was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. RESULTS: Finally, 408 patients were included (185 men and 223 women; mean age, 81.7 ± 5.1 years; range, 62-98 years). Post-procedural death occurred in 13.2% of patients. The muscle-height index and fat-height index at the L3 level were more strongly correlated with those at the T12 level (r = 0.765, p < 0.001 and r = 0.932, p < 0.001, respectively) than with those at the T4 level (r = 0.535, p < 0.001 and r = 0.895, p < 0.001, respectively). The cumulative 1-year mortality rate was highest for patients with both sarcopenia and adipopenia (26%), followed by those with adipopenia only (17%), those with sarcopenia only (12%), and those with neither sarcopenia nor adipopenia (8%, p = 0.002). Multivariable analysis revealed that body composition at the T12 level was an independent risk factor for 1-year mortality (hazard ratio: 4.09, 95% confidence interval: 2.01-8.35) in patients with both sarcopenia and adipopenia (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia or adipopenia assessed with CT at the thoracic level may be valuable for stratifying 1-year all-cause mortality in patients who undergo TAVR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Skeletal muscle and subcutaneous fat mass indices at the level of T12, measured on pre-procedural CT, have value for risk stratification of 1-year all-cause mortality in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement. KEY POINTS: Sarcopenia and adipopenia are associated with the prognosis of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Body composition at the T12 level was an independent risk factor for 1-year all-cause mortality. Sarcopenia or adipopenia assessed at T12 with pre-procedural CT is valuable for risk stratification.

Performance of Purpose-Built vs Off-Label Transcatheter Devices for Aortic Regurgitation: The PURPOSE Study.

BACKGROUND: Severe pure aortic regurgitation (AR) carries a high mortality and morbidity risk, and it is often undertreated because of the inherent surgical risk. Transcatheter heart valves (THVs) have been used off-label in this setting with overall suboptimal results. The dedicated "purpose-built" Jena Valve Trilogy (JVT, JenaValve Technology) showed an encouraging performance, although it has never been compared to other THVs. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to assess the performance of the latest iteration of THVs used off-label in comparison to the purpose-built JVT in inoperable patients with severe AR. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective registry with 18 participating centers worldwide collecting data on inoperable patients with severe AR of the native valve. A bicuspid aortic valve was the main exclusion criterion. The primary endpoints were technical and device success, 1-year all-cause mortality, and the composite of 1-year mortality and the heart failure rehospitalization rate. RESULTS: Overall, 256 patients were enrolled. THVs used off-label were used in 168 cases (66%), whereas JVT was used in 88 (34%). JVT had higher technical (81% vs 98%; P < 0.001) and device success rates (73% vs 95%; P < 0.001), primarily driven by significantly lower incidences of THV embolization (15% vs 1.1%; P < 0.001), the need for a second valve (11% vs 1.1%; P = 0.004), and moderate residual AR (10% vs 1.1%; P = 0.007). The permanent pacemaker implantation rate was comparable and elevated for both groups (22% vs 24%; P = 0.70). Finally, no significant difference was observed at the 1-year follow-up in terms of mortality (HR: 0.99; P = 0.980) and the composite endpoint (HR: 1.5; P = 0.355). CONCLUSIONS: The JVT platform has a better acute performance than other THVs when used off-label for inoperable patients with severe AR. A longer follow-up is conceivably needed to detect a possible impact on prognosis.

Haemophilus parainfluenza-Associated Aortic Root Abscess and Septic Embolic Stroke Post-transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Case Study.

We present a rare instance of aortic root abscess and septic embolic stroke due to Haemophilus parainfluenza in a 75-year-old male patient who had undergone a recent transcatheter aortic valve replacement. The patient initially presented with generalized weakness and altered mental status. Blood cultures grew Haemophilus parainfluenza. Brain imaging showed multiple infarcts with some areas of hemorrhagic conversion. Echocardiography demonstrated an aortic root abscess as well as vegetation on the tricuspid valve. Surgical correction was deemed high risk; hence, management involved intravenous (IV) antibiotics, resulting in the resolution of both symptoms and the abscess.

Permanent pacemaker reduction using temporary-permanent pacemaker as a 1-month bridge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective, multicentre, single-arm, observational study.

Background: The permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation and pacemaker dependency rates after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are highly variable as some of the conduction disturbances are reversible. It remains poorly investigated how to optimise temporary pacing in these patients. This study aimed to explore the potential reduction in the PPM implantation rate using temporary-permanent pacemaker (TPPM) as a 1-month bridge. Methods: This is a prospective, multicentre, single-arm, observational study. Consecutive patients undergoing TAVR from March 1, 2022 to March 1, 2023 in 13 tertiary hospitals in China were screened. Patients who developed high-degree atrioventricular block, complete heart block, or first-degree atrioventricular block plus new onset left bundle branch block during the TAVR procedure or within 1 month after TAVR were included to receive TPPM. Patients with pre-existing PPM implantation or indications for PPM implantation before the TAVR procedure were excluded. Patients with TPPM were monitored to determine whether the conduction disturbances persisted or recovered. The primary endpoint was the rate of freedom from indications for PPM implantation 1 month after TAVR. This study is registered with ChiCTR, ChiCTR2200057931. Findings: Of 688 patients who have undergone TAVR, 71 developed conduction disturbance and met the inclusion criteria, 1 patient withdrew due to noncompliance, 70 patients received TPPM and completed follow-up. There were 41 (58.6%) men and 29 (41.4%) women in the study, with a mean age of 74.3 ± 7.3 years. At 1 month follow-up, 75.7% (53/70) of the patients with TPPM did not require PPM implantation. For 688 patients who have undergone TAVR, the rate of PPM implantation at 1 month was 2.47% (17/688, 95% CI 1.55%-3.92%), representing a significant reduction in self-comparison with the rate at 48 h after TPPM (2.47% vs. 8.28% [95% CI 6.45%-10.58%], P < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained in the subgroup analysis of patients with HAVB/CHB. Multivariate analysis revealed the baseline PR interval, difference between the membranous septum length and implantation depth, and timing of postprocedural conduction disturbance occurrence were independent predictors of freedom from indications for PPM implantation at 1 month after TAVR. Interpretation: Using TPPM as a 1-month bridge allows for a buffer period to distinguish whether conduction disturbances are reversible or persistent, resulting in a significant reduction in the PPM implantation rate after TAVR when compared with the current strategy. However, this is an observational study, the results need to be confirmed in a randomized trial. Funding: Beijing Science and Technology Plan 2022 from Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission.

A novel balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve bioprosthesis: Myval and Myval Octacor.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past two decades, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has expanded its application across all surgical risk levels, including low-risk patients, where, due to longer life expectancy, reducing common pitfalls of TAVR is essential. To address these needs, many technological advancements have been developed. Myval and the new generation Myval Octacor (Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd) are novel balloon-expandable (BE) transcatheter heart valve (THV) systems designed for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. AREAS COVERED: This review aims to illustrate the design features of these novel THVs and the main evidence from available studies. Furthermore, we provide evidence of these THVs' performance in challenging scenarios such as extra-large aortic annuli, bicuspid aortic valves, and valve-in-valve/valve-in-ring procedures. EXPERT OPINION: Myval and Myval Octacor have demonstrated comparable early safety and clinical efficacy to the leading contemporary THVs, exhibiting remarkably low rates of moderate to severe paravalvular leak (PVL) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI). The wide range of sizes offered by the Myval family may minimize the risk of under-/oversizing, potentially explaining the lower rates of the aforementioned phenomena. Moreover, the presence of both internal skirt and external reinforced cuff may also explain the low rate of moderate to severe PVL.