Advanced Cardiac Signal Recording.

Implantable loop recorders allow prolonged and continuous single-lead electrocardiogram recording, with the pivotal addition of remote monitoring. They have significantly shortened time to electrocardiographic diagnosis and appropriate therapy of many bradyarrhythmias/tachyarrhythmias and proved helpful in arrhythmia burden definition, offering invaluable information in the diagnostic workup for syncope and atrial fibrillation. Advanced cardiac signal recording is also possible by transesophageal catheters. They have been used to orient diagnosis during wide and narrow QRS complex tachycardias and also to perform minimally invasive pacing. Intracardiac electrophysiologic study remains, however, essential for diagnosis of several arrhythmias in the perspective of curative catheter ablation.

Comparison of Transesophageal and Intracardiac Electrophysiologic Studies for the Diagnosis of Childhood Supraventricular Tachycardias.

In this study, we aimed to compare the results of transesophageal electrophysiologic studies (TEEPS) and intracardiac electrophysiologic studies (IEPS) in a cohort of pediatric patients with SVTs. The medical records of children aged between 0 and 18 years who underwent TEEPS between January 2007 and June 2012 were systematically reviewed, and those without pre-excitation and who underwent subsequent IEPS were identified. Post-procedural diagnoses were compared for compatibility. A total of 162 patients were included in the study with a mean age at diagnosis 11.6 ± 3.6 years. Tachycardia was induced in 152 patients by TEEPS and in 154 patients by IEPS. Overall, in 147 patients, tachycardia was induced by both TEEPS and IEPS. Diagnoses were compatible in 135 out of 147 patients (91.8 %). Nine out of the 12 patients with discrepant results were diagnosed with atrioventricular-reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) and three with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) after TEEPS. Following IEPS, TEEPS diagnosis of AVRT was revised to typical AVNRT in 5 patients and atypical AVNRT in 4 patients. Two of the 3 patients who were diagnosed as having AVNRT following TEEPS were confirmed to have atrial tachycardia after IEPS, while the other patient was diagnosed with AVRT. Tachycardia terminated spontaneously in 3 patients, while overdrive pacing was attempted to terminate the tachycardia in 149 patients, with a success rate of 93.2 % (139/149). The diagnostic compatibility between TEEPS and IEPS is quite high. A diagnostic discrepancy mostly occurs in patients diagnosed with AVRT by TEEPS, and the possibility of atypical AVNRT should be considered in patients with a VA ≥70 ms to avoid such discrepancies.

Sensitivity of transesophageal electrophysiologic study in children with supraventricular tachycardia on electrocardiography.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the inducibility of tachycardia by transesophageal electrophysiologic study (TEEPS) in patients with documented supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) on electrocardiography and to investigate the accuracy of TEEPS records by comparing with intracardiac electrophysiologic study (IEPS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The TEEPS records of patients having documented electrocardiography during SVT were reviewed. The results of TEEPS in 43 of 85 patients were compared with results of IEPS for compatibility of diagnosis. RESULTS: A total 85 patients, 46 male and 39 female, mean weight 35.1 kg (36-87), aged 1 month-17 years, were included. Tachycardia was induced by TEEPS in 79 of 85 patients with documented electrocardiography (sensitivity 92.9%). IEPS for diagnosis or ablation was conducted in 40 patients having inducible tachycardia and three of six who had no inducible tachycardia by TEEPS. Tachycardia was induced by IEPS in 39 of 40 (97.5%) patients who had inducible tachycardia and two of three who had no inducible tachycardia by TEEPS. Mechanisms of tachycardias were similar in 97.5% of patients (37/39) who had inducible tachycardia in TEEPS and IEPS. One of the patients with atrioventricular reentry tachycardia by TEEPS was diagnosed as atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) and the other one was diagnosed as atypical AVNRT and atrial tachycardia by IEPS. CONCLUSION: The rates of inducibility and mechanisms of tachycardias by TEEPS in children having documented SVT were similar with those obtained from IEPS.

Transesophageal atrial pacing compared with intracardiac electrophysiologic analysis on diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia / 医学研究生学报

Objective:Comparing differences between transesophageal and the intracardia electrophysiologic study,to assure the clinical value of transesophageal pacing on diagnosis of various types of supraventricular tachycardia and different accessory pathway. Methods: Comparing the results of transesophageal atrial pacing(TEAP) and electrophysiological study(EPS) in 142 patients during radiofrequency ablation.Results:Atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia(AVRT)with anterograde,P_(V1)-P_E was more than 25ms,R-P_E was more than 75 ms,with the exception of right septal accessory pathway(RSAP) P_(V1)-P_E was more than 25ms,R-P_E more than 75 ms,with the exception of right septal accessory pathway(RSAP) P_(V1)-P_E was 0,R-P_E more than 75 ms,in patient with atrial reentrant tachycardia(ART)P_(V1)P_E more than 25 ms,R-P_E more than 150 ms and R-P_E more than PE-R.Atrioventricular junctional reentrant tachycardia(AVNRT)P_(V1)-P_E less than 25 ms.R-P_E less than 70 ms.Conclusion:Transesophagus P_(V1)-P_E and R-P_E hold great clinical value on diagnosis of various types of supraventricular tachycardia and different accessory pathway.