[Advantages and disadvantages of transthoracic approach for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction].

Adenocarcinoma of the esophaogastric junction (AEG) has anatomical characteristics of spanning two organs and anatomical sites. Thoracic surgery and gastrointestinal surgery aim at the safe resection margin of esophagus, the scope of lower mediastinal lymph node dissection and whether transthoracic surgery will increase complications. However, there are great differences and controversies in the surgical approach, surgical method, lymph node dissection and extent of resection of AEG. For Siewert II AEG via abdominal mediastinal approach, due to the limitation of exposure and the difficulty of operation, it is difficult to acquire a satisfactory proximal resection margin, and very difficult to dissect the inferior mediastinal lymph nodes. The transthoracic approach can provide adequate exposure, reduce the difficulty of operation, obtain satisfactory resection margin of esophagus and allow lower mediastinal lymph node dissection, which may bring better prognosis. Although transthoracic approach may increase the incidence of pulmonary infection, the standard development of thoracoscopic technology will overcome the disadvantage of transthoracic approach for Siewert II AEG.

Advantages and disadvantages of transthoracic approach for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction / 中华胃肠外科杂志

Adenocarcinoma of the esophaogastric junction (AEG) has anatomical characteristics of spanning two organs and anatomical sites. Thoracic surgery and gastrointestinal surgery aim at the safe resection margin of esophagus, the scope of lower mediastinal lymph node dissection and whether transthoracic surgery will increase complications. However, there are great differences and controversies in the surgical approach, surgical method, lymph node dissection and extent of resection of AEG. For Siewert II AEG via abdominal mediastinal approach, due to the limitation of exposure and the difficulty of operation, it is difficult to acquire a satisfactory proximal resection margin, and very difficult to dissect the inferior mediastinal lymph nodes. The transthoracic approach can provide adequate exposure, reduce the difficulty of operation, obtain satisfactory resection margin of esophagus and allow lower mediastinal lymph node dissection, which may bring better prognosis. Although transthoracic approach may increase the incidence of pulmonary infection, the standard development of thoracoscopic technology will overcome the disadvantage of transthoracic approach for Siewert II AEG.

Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy - influence on patient survival.

AIM: To evaluate the survival of patients after surgery of the esophagus/cardia using the transthoracic and transhiatal methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the years 2007-2011, 102 patients were radically treated for cancer of the esophagus/cardia: 24 women and 78 men at the average age of 59.5. There were 38 transthoracic procedures and 64 transhiatal procedures. All patients had a conduit made from the stomach, led through lodges in the esophagus and combined with the stump of the esophagus in the neck following the Collard method. Two-pole lymphadenectomies were performed in all patients. RESULTS: Patients after transthoracic procedures had statistically more (p < 0.05) lymph nodes removed than patients after transhiatal procedures. The 5-year survival rates in transhiatal and transthoracic procedures did not statistically differ, being 8% and 0% respectively. The length of patient survival was influenced by metastases in the nearby lymph nodes (p < 0.0001) and the presence of adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical access (transhiatal and transthoracic surgery) does not affect the 5-year survival rates. Transhiatal surgery allows a greater number of lymph nodes to be removed. The main factor influencing the 5-year survival rate is the presence of metastases in the nearby lymph nodes.

Video-assisted transthoracic surgery resection of a tracheal mass and reconstruction of trachea under non-intubated anesthesia with spontaneous breathing.

Radical surgery for tracheal tumors is typically completed under basal anesthesia. Thus, endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are required. However, these procedures may influence the surgical operation and meanwhile prolong the surgical duration and postoperative recovery. In this article we describe the application of video-assisted transthoracic surgery (VATS) resection of a tracheal mass and reconstruction of trachea a non-intubated patient with spontaneous breathing.

The clinical analysis of 142 cases of minimally invasive transthoracic device closure of ventricular septal defect / 实用医学杂志

Objective To summarize the minimally invasive transthoracic ventricular septal defect (VSD) occlusion operation experience in the clinical application. Methods 142 VSD patients (admitted from August, 2013 to October, 2014) were chosen. All patients were treated with minimally invasive transthoracic device closure under the monitoring of transoesophageal echocardiogram. Results 136 cases received successful closure, and 6 cases still need CPB conventional extracorporeal circulation operation. After follow-up for 3 ~ 12 months for 102 patients, 16 cases remain residual shunt. Conclusion The short-term therapeutic effect of minimally invasive transthoracic device closure of VSD is satisfying. However , the long-term follow-up remains to be studied.

Transthoracic vs transhiatal surgery for cancer of the esophagogastric junction: a meta-analysis.

AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of the transthoracic and transhiatal approaches for cancer of the esophagogastric junction. METHODS: An electronic and manual search of the literature was conducted in PubMed, EmBase and the Cochrane Library for articles published between March 1998 and January 2013. The pooled data included the following parameters: duration of surgical time, blood loss, dissected lymph nodes, hospital stay time, anastomotic leakage, pulmonary complications, cardiovascular complications, 30-d hospital mortality, and long-term survival. Sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding single studies. RESULTS: Eight studies including 1155 patients with cancer of the esophagogastric junction, with 639 patients in the transthoracic group and 516 in the transhiatal group, were pooled for this study. There were no significant differences between two groups concerning surgical time, blood loss, anastomotic leakage, or cardiovascular complications. Dissected lymph nodes also showed no significant differences between two groups in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs. However, we did observe a shorter hospital stay (WMD = 1.92, 95%CI: 1.63-2.22, P < 0.00001), lower 30-d hospital mortality (OR = 3.21, 95%CI: 1.13-9.12, P = 0.03), and decreased pulmonary complications (OR = 2.95, 95%CI: 1.95-4.45, P < 0.00001) in the transhiatal group. For overall survival, a potential survival benefit was achieved for type III tumors with the transhiatal approach. CONCLUSION: The transhiatal approach for cancers of the esophagogastric junction, especially types III, should be recommended, and its long-term outcome benefits should be further evaluated.