Trastornos adaptativos y su manejo desde atención primaria / Adaptive disorders and their management in primary care

Introducción: El trastorno de adaptación describe una respuesta emocional y conductual desproporcionada a uno o más estresores psicosociales identificables. Existen múltiples situaciones capaces de generarnos una situación de estrés agudo. Sin embargo, uno de los requisitos necesarios para poder hablar de trastorno adaptativo es que ese o esos factores estresantes supongan un deterioro en el funcionamiento normal del individuo. Objetivos: El objetivo principal de este trabajo es analizar, mediante una revisión bibliográfica, el diagnóstico y abordaje de los trastornos adaptativos dentro del ámbito de Atención Primaria. El objetivo secundario es destacar la importancia de la detección y el tratamiento precoces, así como de la gestión multidisciplinar y la promoción de la salud mental. Resultados: Los principales factores de riesgo de los trastornos adaptativos son el desempleo, los bajos ingresos,el escaso apoyo social, las enfermedades físicas y la salud mental. La prevalencia es mayor en jóvenes,especialmente entre las mujeres, y existe un riesgo aumentado de suicidio en el subtipo de estado de ánimo depresivo. El Cuestionario Internacional de Trastornos Adaptativos es actualmente la principal herramienta diagnóstica, por establecer sus criterios diagnósticos en base a la definición teórica establecida por la CIE-11. El manejo de estos trastornos se realiza principalmente mediante terapia cognitivo-conductual. Conclusiones: Los trastornos de adaptación surgen como respuestas anormales ante ciertas situaciones estresantes. El papel de los médicos de Atención Primaria en el abordaje de este trastorno es primordial, siendo necesaria su detección y manejo precoz para disminuir los niveles de ansiedad disfuncionales que presentan los pacientes.(AU)

Introduction: Adjustment disorder describes a disproportionate emotional and behavioral response to one or more identifiable psychosocial stressors. There are multiple situations capable of generating an acute stressful situation. However, one of the requirements to be able to speak of an adaptive disorder is that the stressor(s) in question should lead to an impairment of the individual's normal functioning.Objectives: The main objective of this work is to analyze , through a literature review, the diagnosis and approach to the diagnosis and management of adaptive disorders in the Primary Care setting. The secondary objective is toemphasize the importance of early detection and treatment, as well as multidisciplinary management and mentalhealth promotion. Results: The main risk factors for adjustment disorders are unemployment, low income, low social support, physical illness, and personal history of mental health. The International Questionnaire of Adaptive Disorders is currently the principal diagnostic tool, as it establishes its diagnostic criteria based on the theoretical definition established by the ICD-11. The management of these disorders is mainly through cognitive behavioural therapy.Conclusions: Adjustment disorders arise as abnormal responses to certain stressful situations. The role of primary care physicians in dealing with this disorder is essential, and early detection and management are necessary to reduce the levels of dysfunctional anxiety that patients present.(AU)

Ancianos con trastorno adaptativo en la interconsulta de psicogeriatría: perfil clínico y abordaje terapéutico / Elderly patients with adaptive disorder diagnosis in psychogeriatry interconsultation: clinical profile and therapeutic approach

Introducción. El trastorno adaptativo es una entidad clínica frecuente pero muy escasamente estudiada en población anciana hospitalizada por causas somáticas. A pesar de su doble consideración como entidad benigna y no subsidiaria de mejoría mediante tratamiento farmacológico, su evolución puede ser tórpida y el empleo de psicofármacos está muy extendido. En una población anciana con pluripatología y polifarmacia, el uso de fármacos podría ser nocivo. Métodos. Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo de 123 pacientes con diagnóstico de trastorno adaptativo atendidos por la Interconsulta de Psicogeriatría de un hospital de tercer nivelen los años 2016 y 2017. Se valoran antecedentes, manejo al diagnóstico y durante el seguimiento posterior hasta el año. Resultados. Un 75,9% del total de pacientes recibieron tratamiento farmacológico al diagnóstico de trastorno adaptativo, mientras que solo un 22,8% son derivados a Psicología clínica. Al alta, solo 50% de los pacientes son derivados a Salud Mental. El 13,8% de los pacientes fueron exitus antes del alta de hospitalización. El 72,6% precisaron durante el año de seguimiento un nuevo reingreso hospitalario, y de este grupo, el 16,6% precisó escalada en la dosis de psicofármacos. Conclusiones. Además de aportar datos sobre el manejo clínico de este perfil complejo y frecuente de pacientes, este trabajo sirve como punto de partida para futuras líneas de investigación que puedan aportar luz sobre un aspecto muy pobremente reflejado en la bibliografía médica actual a pesar del envejecimiento inexorable de la población. (AU)

Introduction. Adaptive disorder is a frequent diagnosisbut poorly studied in the elderly population hospitalized. Despite it is considerate benign and non-subsidiary entityof improvement through pharmacological treatment. It canevolve in a difficult way and the pharmacological treatmentis widespread. The use of drugs could be harmful the elderly population with pluripathology and polypharmacy. Methods. A retrospective descriptive study, total of 123patients diagnosed with adaptive disorder and attended bythe Psychogeriatric Liaison in a third-level hospital between2016 and 2017. Medical history, management at diagnosis andfollow-up until one year after discharge were collected on. Results. At the diagnosis of adaptative disorder the75.9% of all patients received pharmacological treatment, while only 22.8% were referred to psychology. Only 50% ofpatients were referred to mental health upon discharge. The13.8% of patients died before discharge from hospital. During the follow-up year, the 72.6% required a new hospital admission. And of this group, the 16.6% required increasingthe dose of drugs. Conclusions. This study provides data on the clinical management of this complicated and frequent profile ofpatients. In addition, this work is a starting point for future lines of research that can shed light on an aspect very poorly reflected in the current medical literature despite the aging of the population. (AU)

Mental health status and risk factors during Covid-19 pandemic in the Croatia's adult population.

Background: The Covid-19 pandemic is associated with adverse mental health outcomes for people worldwide.Objective: The study aimed to assess mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic and the key risk factors from the human ecology perspective in Croatia's adult population.Method: An online panel survey with 1,201 adult participants (50.1% women) was done with a nationally representative sample in terms of gender, age, and country region four months after the nation lockdown began and two months after most of the restrictions were lifted. Indicators of mental health included symptoms of adjustment disorder (ADNM-8); depression, anxiety, and stress (DASS-21); symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PC-PTSD-5); and well-being (WHO-5).Results: In the entire sample, 9.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.9%, 14.0%) of the participants were at risk of adjustment disorder, 7.7% (95% CI: 6.7%, 11.9%) were at risk of depression disorder, and 7.8% (95% CI: 5.3%, 10.3%) were at risk of anxiety disorder. In addition, 7.2% (95% CI: 5.3%, 10.2%) were experiencing high levels of stress. The average well-being score was 56.5 (SD = 21.91) on a scale from 0 to 100. Among the participants who have lifetime traumatic experience (n = 429), 14% (95% CI: 10.6%, 17.2%) were at risk for PTSD. Key risk factors for specific mental health outcomes differed, but the common ones included: current health status, previous mental health diagnosis, and psychological resilience. Being younger, having a below-average income, and excessively following news about Covid-19 were predictive for some of the mental health problems.Conclusions: Together, the key risk factors identified in this study indicate the need for public health interventions addressing the general population's mental health, but also for specific risk groups. Lower rates of mental health symptoms assessed soon after lifting quarantine measures that have been found in other studies may indicate human resilience capacity.

Key risk factors for mental health disorders during the Covid-19 pandemic in Croatia were: current health status, previous mental health diagnosis, psychological resilience, younger age, below-average income, and excessively following news about the pandemic.

How do adolescents with Adjustment Disorder cope with stressful situations? Relationship with suicidal risk.

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the role of coping in relation to suicidal risk in adolescents with Adjustment Disorder (AD). The present study aimed to assess the relation between suicidal ideation and intention and coping strategies in a clinical sample of adolescents with AD, paying special attention to gender differences. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Self-reported questionnaires about suicidal ideation and intention and coping strategies were administered to 108 adolescents with an AD diagnosis. RESULTS: Compared with the normative population, adolescents with an AD diagnosis made more use of Acceptance-Resignation (an avoidance-type coping strategy) and less use of Positive Reappraisal (an approach-type coping strategy). Nevertheless, gender introduced some peculiarities. A relationship was observed between the use of certain coping strategies and suicidal ideation and intention, but with notable differences depending on gender: significant and high correlations were found between these two variables in AD boys, both in the total approach score (r=.53, p<.01) and in the total avoidant score (r=.60, p<.01), with coping strategies explaining 41% of suicidal ideation and intention; in girls, in contrast, the only significant relationship was with an avoidant strategy, Emotional Discharge (r=.25, p<.05), although it had low explanatory power. CONCLUSIONS: Coping strategies must be taken into consideration when assessing and treating adolescents with AD at risk of suicide, especially in the case of boys. The absence of association between coping strategies and suicidal risk in girls is discussed, and some therapeutic proposals are presented.