RESUMO
Survivorship issues and treatment related toxicities have considerably increased in breast cancer patients following improved therapeutic options. Cardiotoxicity has been a major treatment related side effects in these patients. Despite this being a well-known entity, the real magnitude of the problem remains an enigma. The amount of research in mitigation of cardiotoxicity or its management in breast cancer survivors is limited and there is an urgent need for finding solutions for the problem. In this article, we are reviewing the agents that cause cardiotoxicity and suggesting a proposal for follow up of breast cancer survivors in an attempt to reduce the magnitude of impact on their quality of life.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Cardiotoxicidade/etiologia , Cardiotoxicidade/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , SobreviventesRESUMO
Primary care physicians are in a favorable position to curb the growing burden of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This review aims to provide an overview of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from a primary care perspective, with a specific focus on risk factors, selection of high-risk individuals for screening, patient presentation at the primary-care clinic, and the role of the internist in supportive care. Overall, the internist is an essential member of the multidisciplinary care team with respect to optimizing patients' quality of life across various stages of the pancreatic cancer.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Medicina Interna/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/etiologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/etiologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite clear benefits of radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer, there are numerous side effects. Radiation dermatitis has a significant impact on quality of life and can result in treatment interruptions or cessation. The purpose of this study was to prospectively follow breast radiation dermatitis and determine trends including peak toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Upon initiation of RT treatment, to assess skin reaction, each patient was seen weekly by the healthcare team, or contacted via telephone to assess patient-reported symptoms. Weekly progression of radiation dermatitis was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.03. Patients were stratified for analysis of radiation dermatitis based on RT technique and dosage. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients with 2 or more skin assessments were analyzed. The majority of patients received 2-field tangential RT (64.2%) with a dose of 5000 cGy in 25 fractions. Overall, patients experienced the most Grade 2 CTCAE toxicity (61.9%) 2 weeks after completion of RT; Grade 3 toxicity also peaked at this time (8.3%). Regardless of stratification by RT technique or by dosage of RT, Grade 2 and 3 toxicities consistently peaked at 1 or 2 weeks after RT. CONCLUSIONS: Breast radiation dermatitis appears to peak approximately 2 weeks after RT. Treatment factors such as technique or dosing regimen do not appear to have a substantial effect on radiation dermatitis, but our study was limited by small sample size. This study provides additional evidence that radiation dermatitis should continue to be followed closely, especially in the 2 weeks following RT.