Utilizing tubular retractors in colloid cyst resection: A single surgeon experience.

Background: Colloid cysts are intracranial lesions originating from abnormalities in the primitive neuroepithelium folding of the third ventricle. Various surgical approaches have been explored for the management of colloid cysts, each carrying its own set of advantages and limitations. Tubular retractors developed recently alleviate retraction pressure through radial distribution, potentially offering benefits for colloid cyst resection. This study aims to introduce and assess a modified microsurgical method utilizing the tubular retractor for addressing colloid cysts. Methods: The study included a retrospective assessment of patients who had colloid cysts and who were treated between 2015 and 2023 by one experienced surgeon. The demographic, clinical, radiological, histological, and surgical data regarding these patients were evaluated. The patients were assessed using the colloid cyst risk score, indicating a risk for obstructive hydrocephalus. Results: The minimally invasive microsurgical approach was successfully applied to all 22 identified patients. No postoperative surgical complications were reported. Gross total resection was achieved in 21 (95.5%) patients. The early complication rate was 22.7% (n = 5). There were no postoperative seizures, permanent neurological deficits, or venous injuries. The average hospital stay was 3 days. There was no evidence of recurrence at an average follow-up length of 25.9 months. Conclusion: The transtubular approach is an effective, safe method for treating colloid cysts. It achieves complete cyst removal with minimal complications, offering the benefits of less invasiveness, improved visualization, and reduced tissue disruption, strengthening its role in colloid cyst surgery.

Minimally invasive craniotomy for putaminal hemorrhage using a tubular retractor: A technical note.

Background: Minimally invasive endoscopic and stereotactic surgery have been established as surgical treatments for putaminal hemorrhage. However, facilities that do not have equipment for endoscopic or stereotactic surgery will likely have to perform conventional craniotomy. Using a tubular retractor, we were able to perform minimally invasive surgery, such as endoscopic surgery. Methods: A craniotomy was performed for left putaminal hemorrhage after cerebral infarction treatment. A 3-4 cm craniotomy centered at Kocher's point was performed under general anesthesia. A 2 cm incision was made in the cortex, and a tubular retractor was inserted under a microscope. The hematoma was reached at a position 4-5 cm from the cortex. Results: Thanks to the tubular retractor, it was relatively easy to observe the hematoma, and it was possible to remove it and confirm hemostasis without difficulty. Brain injury caused by the retractor insertion cavity was small, and no hemostasis was required. The surgery was completed by dura mater closure, bone flap fixation, and wound closure as per the standard. Most of the putaminal hemorrhage could be removed, and there was no rebleeding after the operation. The patient is still undergoing rehabilitation because of aphasia and muscle weakness. Manual Muscle Testing was at three points in the upper limb, and four points in the lower limb remained. Conclusion: For putaminal hemorrhage, microscopic craniotomy was performed using a tubular retractor and an approach such as endoscopic surgery. Craniotomy, hematoma removal, and hemostasis operations are also considered to be minimally invasive surgeries.

Minimally Invasive Technique for Chiari I Decompression Without Durotomy: Surgical Technique and Preliminary Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Chiari I malformation, marked by severe headaches and potential brainstem/spinal cord issues, often requires surgical intervention when conservative methods fail. This study introduces a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) Chiari decompression technique utilizing a 3-blade retractor, aiming to reduce postoperative discomfort and optimize outcomes. METHODS: Chiari type I malformation patients who underwent a MIS technique were included. Technique consisted of a minimal-soft tissue opening using a 3-blade retractor, suboccipital craniectomy, C1 laminectomy, and resection of the atlantooccipital band without a durotomy. RESULTS: Ten patients were treated. Mean age was 43.3 years, with 7 female patients. All patients presented with occipital headaches; 50% retroorbital pain; 40% neck, upper back, or shoulder pain; and 30% limb paresthesias. Median pre-surgical modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was 3 (2-4) and pain visual analog score (VAS) was 7 (5-9). Mean operative time was 59 (59-71) minutes, with mean blood loss of 88.5 (50-140) mL. In our sample, 90% of patients were discharged the same surgical day (mean 7.2 [5.3-7.7] hours postoperative). No immediate or delayed postoperative complications were evidenced. At 6 months, 90% of patients had mRS 0-1. At last follow-up the mean VAS was 1.5 (range: 0-4, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The MIS 3-blade flexible retractor technique for Chiari decompression is feasible, provides wide visualization angles of the suboccipital region and C1 arch, allows 2-surgeon work, and minimizes skin and soft tissue disruption. This combination may diminish postoperative discomfort, reduce the risk of surgical site infections, and optimize outcomes.

Minimally invasive resection of intracranial lesions using tubular retractors: A single surgeon series.

OBJECTIVE: Tubular retractors are increasingly used due to their low complication rates, providing easier access to lesions while minimizing trauma from brain retraction. Our study presents the most extensive series of cases performed by a single surgeon aiming to assess the effectiveness and safety of a transcortical-transtubular approach for removing intracranial lesions. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent resection of an intracranial lesion with the use of tubular retractors. Electronic medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, preoperative clinical deficits, diagnosis, preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, lesion characteristics including location, volume, extent of resection (EOR), postoperative complications, and postoperative deficits. RESULTS: 112 transtubular resections for intracranial lesions were performed. Patients presented with a diverse number of pathologies including metastasis (31.3 %), GBM (21.4 %), and colloid cysts (19.6 %) The mean pre-op lesion volume was 14.45 cm3. A gross total resection was achieved in 81 (71.7 %) cases. Seventeen (15.2 %) patients experienced early complications which included confusion, short-term memory difficulties, seizures, meningitis and motor and visual deficits. Four (3.6 %) patients had permanent complications, including one with aphasia and difficulty finding words, another with memory loss, a third with left-sided weakness, and one patient who developed new-onset long-term seizures. Mean post-operative hospitalization length was 3.8 days. CONCLUSION: Tubular retractors provide a minimally invasive approach for the extraction of intracranial lesions. They serve as an efficient tool in neurosurgery, facilitating the safe resection of deep-seated lesions with minimal complications.

O-arm guided minimally invasive resection of intrathoracic epidural schwannoma: how I do it.

BACKGROUND: Schwannomas are the most common intrathoracic neurogenic tumors. In the past, they were often treated by traditional open surgery. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has also been used for some large tumors. Recently, minimally invasive posterior neurosurgical technique provides a new option for some of these tumors. METHOD: Here, we describe the specific steps involved in the O-arm guided minimally invasive removal of intrathoracic epidural schwannoma, as well as its advantages and limitations. CONCLUSION: O-arm guided minimally invasive resection of intrathoracic epidural schwannoma is safe and effective and causes little damage.

Impact of Preoperative Mapping and Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery for Deep-Seated Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Transsulcal tubular retractor-assisted minimally invasive parafascicular surgery changes the surgical strategy for deep-seated lesions by promoting a deficit-sparing approach. When integrated with preoperative brain mapping and intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), this approach may potentially improve patient outcomes. In this study, we assessed the impact of preoperative brain mapping and IONM in tubular retractor-assisted neuro-oncological surgery. METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study included patients who underwent transsulcal tubular retractor-assisted minimally invasive parafascicular surgery for resection of deep-seated brain tumors from 2016 to 2022. The cohort was divided into 3 groups: group 1, no preoperative mapping or IONM (17 patients); group 2, IONM only (25 patients); group 3, both preoperative mapping and IONM (38 patients). RESULTS: We analyzed 80 patients (33 males and 47 females) with a median age of 46.5 years (range: 1-81 years). There was no significant difference in mean tumor volume (26.2 cm3 [range 1.07-97.4 cm3]; P = 0.740) and mean preoperative depth of the tumor (31 mm [range 3-65 mm], P = 0.449) between the groups. A higher proportion of high-grade gliomas and metastases was present within group 3 (P = 0.003). IONM was related to fewer motor (P = 0.041) and language (P = 0.032) deficits at hospital discharge. Preoperative mapping and IONM were also related to shorter length of stay (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative and intraoperative brain mapping and monitoring enhance transsulcal tubular retractor-assisted minimally invasive parafascicular surgery in neuro-oncology. Patients had a reduced length of stay and prolonged overall survival. IONM alone reduces postoperative neurological deficit.

Awake minimally invasive parafascicular approach to a language eloquent brain tumour-surgical video.

Deep-seated brain tumours are surgically challenging to access. When planning approaches to these lesions, it is important to take into account eloquent cortical areas, grey matter nuclei, and subcortical white matter tracts. Traditionally, access to deep-seated lesions would require brain retraction; however, this is associated with secondary brain damage, which may impair neurological function. A trans-sulcal minimally invasive parafascicular approach allows gentle splitting of brain fibres and is thought to splay rather than sever white matter tracts. This is particularly important when approaching medially located, language-eloquent tumours, which lack brain surface expression. This video describes a minimally invasive approach to a deep-seated, language-eloquent brain tumour. We utilized preoperative cortical and subcortical planning to define a safe surgical corridor. We then demonstrate using intraoperative neuro-monitoring and mapping of the motor and language functions to define the boundaries of surgical resection. We find trans-sulcal minimally invasive parafascicular approach to be a safe and effective technique when approaching language-eloquent lesions medial to the main language subcortical networks.

Standardization of Strategies to Perform a Parafascicular Tubular Approach for the Resection of Brain Tumors in Eloquent Areas.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work is to define a methodological strategy for the minimally invasive tubular retractor (MITR) parafascicular transulcal approach (PTA) for the management of brain tumors sited in eloquent areas. METHODS: An observational prospective study was designed to evaluate the benefits of PTA associated with MITRs, tractography and intraoperative cortical stimulation. They study was conducted from June 2018 to June 2021. Information regarding white matter tracts was processed, preventing a potential damage during the approach and/or resection. All patients older than 18 years who had a single brain tumor lesion were included in the study. Patients with a preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score greater than 70% and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score > 14 points were included. RESULTS: 72 patients were included in the study, the mean age was 49.6, the most affected gender was male, 12.5% presented aphasia, 11.1% presented paraphasia, 41.6% had motor deficit, 9.7% had an affection in the optic pathway, the most frequently affected region was the frontal lobe (26.3%), the most frequent lesions were high-grade gliomas (34.7%) and the measurement of the incisions was on average 5.58 cm. Of the patients, 94.4% underwent a total macroscopic resection and 90.2% did not present new postoperative neurological deficits. In all cases, a PTA was used. CONCLUSION: Tubular minimally invasive approaches (MIAs) allow one to perform maximal safe resection of brain tumors in eloquent areas, through small surgical corridors. Future comparative studies between traditional and minimally invasive techniques are required to further investigate the potential of these surgical nuances.

Pure endoscopic minimally invasive surgery with a non­expandable tubular retractor for intradural extramedullary spinal tumors.

Minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) for intradural extramedullary (IDEM) spinal tumors is a safe and effective surgical strategy. Currently, various tubular retractors are widely used in the MISS of IDEM spinal tumors, primarily relying on microscopic visualization. To the best of the authors' knowledge, there is no report of pure endoscopic surgery with parallel non-expandable tubular retractors for IDEM spinal lesions. The present study reports a case series of IDEM spinal tumors that were treated via pure endoscopic MISS with a parallel non-expandable tubular retractor. The extent of tumor resection was evaluated by comparing preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The initial and follow-up clinical conditions were assessed according to the visual analog scale for pain and the modified McCormick scale for neurological status. Postoperative MRI demonstrated that all cases had achieved a gross total resection. After the operation, the clinical symptoms of all patients were significantly improved and there were no serious postoperative complications. At the initial follow-up, the pain experienced by the patients was significantly reduced or had even disappeared, and the neurological deficit was improved by at least one grade on the modified McCormick scale. The present report indicates that pure endoscopic MISS with a parallel non-expandable tubular retractor may be an effective and safe surgical strategy for IDEM spinal tumor resection.

Minimally invasive tubular approach for lumbar extraforaminal disc herniation: how I do it.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgical resection of extraforaminal disc herniation is challenging. The anatomical landmarks are varying from common interlaminar approach. The main risk is to damage the exiting nerve root as it is not yet protected by any bony structure. METHOD: Here, we present the different steps of the minimally invasive approach to resect a lumbar extraforaminal disc herniation, using tubular retractor under microscopy. CONCLUSION: Once the key steps of tubular placements are well known, minimally invasive approach for such extraforaminal resection affords appropriate exposure, while reducing blood loss and muscle injury.

A minimally invasive tubular retractor-assisted retropleural approach for thoracic disc herniations - case series and technical note.

PURPOSE: Thoracic disc herniations are uncommon and carry a high risk for neurological deterioration. Traditional surgical approaches include thoracotomy, costotransversectomy or posterior approaches with considerable morbidity. In this technical note with case series, we describe a minimally invasive tubular retractor-assisted retropleural approach for simple and less invasive microsurgical exploration of thoracic disc herniations from a lateral angle. METHODS: Surgical technique consisted of partial rib resection and retropleural dissection followed by the placement of a tubular retractor (METRx Tubes, Medtronic) for an anterior-lateral exposure of the disc and neuroforamen. Epidemiological, clinical and surgical patient data were acquired. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2020, six patients were surgically treated using the minimally invasive tubular retractor-assisted retropleural approach. Microsurgical exposure of the disc and neural structures was achieved from a lateral direction without requiring thoracotomy or lung deflation. Control imaging confirmed resection in all cases without relevant residuum. As postoperative complications, one dural injury and one postoperative pneumothorax occured. No neurologic deterioration or recurrence occurred during a median follow-up of 3 months. CONCLUSION: The described tubular retractor-assisted retropleural exposure serves as a feasible minimally invasive microsurgical approach to the anterior-lateral thoracic spine.

Long-Term Reoperation Rates After Open versus Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Disease: Five Year Follow-Up of 2130 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (MISS) is a growing alternative to Open Spine Surgery (OSS). The preservation of musculature and minimization of iatrogenic injury is hypothesized to decrease the need for reoperation by preserving normal anatomy. Our objective is to compare the relative long-term reoperation rates after MISS and OSS for the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. METHODS: This retrospective analysis compares the long-term reoperation rates after MISS and OSS. Eligible patients were adults with a primary lumbar intervention carried out between 5/1/2004 and 1/31/2014 to allow for at least 5 years of follow up. Patients without sufficient descriptive metrics or follow-up data were excluded. The primary outcome was the rate of lumbar spine reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 2130 patients met the inclusion criteria-1895 underwent OSS and 235 underwent MISS. On average and across all surgery types (decompression and decompression with fusion), 28% of OSS patients required reoperation during the minimum 5-year follow up period while only 14% of MISS patients required reoperation (P = 0.001). The MISS group was statistically identical to the OSS group in all categories except that the MISS group was on average 1.8 years older (62.25 vs. 60.45, P = 0.039) and had a higher incidence of diabetes (26% vs. 17%, P = 0.000), but had a lower average body mass index than the OSS group (28.35 vs. 29.60, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of degenerative lumbar spine disease, MISS has the potential to reduce the long-term need for reoperation when compared with OSS.

Surgical cytoreduction of deep-seated high-grade glioma through tubular retractor.

OBJECTIVE: Maximal safe resection is the goal of surgical treatment for high-grade glioma (HGG). Deep-seated hemispheric gliomas present a surgical challenge due to safety concerns and previously were often considered inoperable. The authors hypothesized that use of tubular retractors would allow resection of deep-seated gliomas with an acceptable safety profile. The purpose of this study was to describe surgical outcomes and survival data after resection of deep-seated HGG with stereotactically placed tubular retractors, as well as to discuss the technical advances that enable such procedures. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 20 consecutive patients who underwent 22 resections of deep-seated hemispheric HGG with the Viewsite Brain Access System by a single surgeon. Patient demographics, survival, tumor characteristics, extent of resection (EOR), and neurological outcomes were recorded. Cannulation trajectories and planned resection volumes depended on the relative location of white matter tracts extracted from diffusion tractography. The surgical plans were designed on the Brainlab system and preoperatively visualized on the Surgical Theater virtual reality SNAP platform. Volumetric assessment of EOR was obtained on the Brainlab platform and confirmed by a board-certified neuroradiologist. RESULTS: Twenty adult patients (18 with IDH-wild-type glioblastomas and 2 with IDH-mutant grade IV astrocytomas) and 22 surgeries were included in the study. The cohort included both newly diagnosed (n = 17; 77%) and recurrent (n = 5; 23%) tumors. Most tumors (64%) abutted the ventricular system. The average preoperative and postoperative tumor volumes measured 33.1 ± 5.3 cm3 and 15.2 ± 5.1 cm3, respectively. The median EOR was 93%. Surgical complications included 2 patients (10%) who developed entrapment of the temporal horn, necessitating placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt; 1 patient (5%) who suffered a wound infection and pulmonary embolus; and 1 patient (5%) who developed pneumonia. In 2 cases (9%) patients developed new permanent visual field deficits, and in 5 cases (23%) patients experienced worsening of preoperative deficits. Preoperative neurological or cognitive deficits remained the same in 9 cases (41%) and improved in 7 (32%). The median overall survival was 14.4 months in all patients (n = 20) and in the newly diagnosed IDH-wild-type glioblastoma group (n = 16). CONCLUSIONS: Deep-seated HGGs, which are surgically challenging and frequently considered inoperable, are amenable to resection through tubular retractors, with an acceptable safety profile. Such cytoreductive surgery may allow these patients to experience an overall survival comparable to those with more superficial tumors.

[Tubular retractors for transcranial approaches to intraaxial brain tumors in children]. / Opyt primeneniya tubulyarnykh retraktorov v transkranial'noi khirurgii intraaksial'nykh opukholei golovnogo mozga u detei.

Reduction of surgical trauma associated with approach to deep brain structures including resection of tumors is an urgent direction in development of techniques and technology. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy and safety of tubular retractors in surgery of deep brain tumors in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 17 children with deep brain tumors who underwent surgery between 2020 and 2021. Tubular retractors were used in all cases. The control group consisted of 15 children with a similar disease and standard intraoperative tissue traction technique. All patients underwent MRI of the brain on the first postoperative day. We analyzed severity of traction-induced damage to brain tissue in T2 FLAIR and DWI images. RESULTS: Clinical outcomes and structure of surgical complications were similar in both groups. Tubular retractor turned out to be a tool reducing traction injury. In the main group, postoperative MRI revealed significantly less damage to brain tissue along surgical approach in T2 (edema zone) and DWI (ischemic changes) images.

Decision-Making and Management in a Patient With Coexistent Colloid Cyst and Pituitary Macroadenoma: A Case Report.

The coexistence of separate and distinct primary intracranial tumors is rare. Specifically, there are no previous reports of a colloid cyst coexisting with a pituitary macroadenoma. We present the case of a 40-year-old male with a colloid cyst associated with mild enlargement of the right lateral ventricle and a coexistent pituitary macroadenoma with compression of the optic apparatus. An endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS) for resection of the pituitary mass was performed first due to the patient's complaints of acute visual changes. He then underwent a right frontal craniotomy for resection of the colloid cyst one month later. The patient recovered without residual deficits in vision, and he did not require ventricular shunting after removal of the colloid cyst. We aimed to discuss our decision-making process and the management of these coexistent lesions.

Posterior Oblique Square Decompression with a Three-Step Wanding Technique in Tubular Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Report and Mid-Long-Term Clinical Outcomes.

Although minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is the most common procedure in minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt), details of the technique remain unclear. This technical report shows the mid-long-term clinical outcomes in patients who underwent posterior oblique square decompression (POSDe) with the three-step wanding technique of tubular MIS-TLIF for degenerative lumbar disease. Tubular MIS-TLIF (POSDe) was performed on 50 patients (males, 19; age, 69.2 ± 9.6 years), and traditional open surgery was performed (OS) on 27 (males, 4; age, 67.9 ± 6.6 years). We evaluated the clinical outcomes using the Visual Analog Scale for back pain, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. We also assessed the fusion rate using the Bridwell grading system with computed tomography or plain radiography for at least 2 years postoperatively. Although there was no significant difference in the improvement rate of JOA scores between the two groups, the mean operation time and blood loss were significantly lower with MIS-TLIF than with OS. In the tubular MIS-TLIF group, there were no cases of deep wound infection; four cases had a pseudarthrosis, two had dural injury, and three had cage retropulsion. We revealed good clinical outcomes in patients who underwent POSDe.

Feasibility of unilateral hemilaminectomy utilizing a Williams retractor for the resection of intradural-extramedullary spinal neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: While open approaches have historically been used in the surgical treatment of intradural-extramedullary spine tumors, minimally-invasive surgical (MIS) techniques are frequently applied to minimize post-operative complications associated with open surgery. Tubular retractor systems in particular have been employed in combination with the unilateral hemilaminectomy (UHL) approach. Here we describe the use of a Williams retractor as a safe and effective minimally-invasive alternative to tubular retractor systems with similar post-operative outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of eight patients who underwent unilateral hemilaminectomy using a Williams retractor for the minimally-invasive resection of intradural-extramedullary neoplasms at a large tertiary academic center from 2017 to 2019. Patient demographics, pathologic specimens, radiographic studies, and intraoperative parameters were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: In our series, gross total resection was achieved in all cases. Average operative time was 158±40minutes, the mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 44.4±30.4mL, and mean length of stay was three days. All patients reported symptomatic improvement at follow-up as reported by Visual Analog Scale scores. CONCLUSION: A Williams retractor yields similar outcomes with respect to post-operative pain, operative time, and EBL as it maintains the advantages of the UHL approach in the resection of intradural-extramedullary spine tumors while enhancing feasibility and providing significant cost savings.

Minimally invasive versus open lumbar spinal fusion: a matched study investigating patient-reported and surgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: With the expanding indications for and increasing popularity of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for lumbar spinal fusion, large-scale outcomes analysis to compare MIS approaches with open procedures is warranted. METHODS: The authors queried the Quality Outcomes Database for patients who underwent elective lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease. They performed optimal matching, at a 1:2 ratio between patients who underwent MIS and those who underwent open lumbar fusion, to create two highly homogeneous groups in terms of 33 baseline variables (including demographic characteristics, comorbidities, symptoms, patient-reported scores, indications, and operative details). The outcomes of interest were overall satisfaction, decrease in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and back and leg pain, as well as hospital length of stay (LOS), operative time, reoperations, and incidental durotomy rate. Satisfaction was defined as a score of 1 or 2 on the North American Spine Society scale. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in ODI was defined as ≥ 30% decrease from baseline. Outcomes were assessed at the 3- and 12-month follow-up evaluations. RESULTS: After the groups were matched, the MIS and open groups consisted of 1483 and 2966 patients, respectively. Patients who underwent MIS fusion had higher odds of satisfaction at 3 months (OR 1.4, p = 0.004); no difference was demonstrated at 12 months (OR 1.04, p = 0.67). Lumbar stenosis, single-level fusion, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System grade, and absence of spondylolisthesis were most prominently associated with higher odds of satisfaction with MIS compared with open surgery. Patients in the MIS group had slightly lower ODI scores at 3 months (mean difference 1.61, p = 0.006; MCID OR 1.14, p = 0.0495) and 12 months (mean difference 2.35, p < 0.001; MCID OR 1.29, p < 0.001). MIS was also associated with a greater decrease in leg and back pain at both follow-up time points. The two groups did not differ in operative time and incidental durotomy rate; however, LOS was shorter for the MIS group. Revision surgery at 12 months was less likely for patients who underwent MIS (4.1% vs 5.6%, p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who underwent lumbar fusion for degenerative spinal disease, MIS was associated with higher odds of satisfaction at 3 months postoperatively. No difference was demonstrated at the 12-month follow-up. MIS maintained a small, yet consistent, superiority in decreasing ODI and back and leg pain, and MIS was associated with a lower reoperation rate.

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Tubular Surgery with Conventional Surgery in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative safety and efficacy of minimally invasive tubular surgery for patients with spinal metastasis. METHODS: A total of 161 consecutive patients with spinal metastasis between June 2017 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 36 patients were included in this study, 14 patients underwent minimally invasive tubular surgery (M), and 22 patients underwent conventional surgery (C). T-test and chi-square tests were used to evaluate demographic and perioperative data differences between the two groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between M and C groups except for the SINS (p=0.002) and preoperative Alb (p=0.026). There was no significant difference in operative time and complications between M and C groups (p<0.05). The M group had less mean blood loss than the C group (1275 vs 718mL, p=0.045). Blood transfusion was comparable between the two groups (p<0.05). The mean amount and drainage time were lower than the C group (141 vs 873mL, p<0.001; 3.1 vs 7.0 days, P<0.001). The mean postoperative hospitalization of the M group was 8.8 days, which was lower than the C group (11.3 days, p=0.045). Sub-analysis showed that for patients with hyper-vascular tumor, the M group had less mean amount and time of drainage compared with the C group (p<0.05); for patients with hypo-vascular tumor, the mean blood loss and amount of blood transfusion were also reduced in M group (p<0.05). The mean blood loss and drainage time of patients with hypo-vascular tumors were less than patients with hyper-vascular tumors in the M group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In selected cases, minimally invasive tubular surgery is safe and effective for patients with spinal metastasis. Patients with hypo-vascular tumors were more suitable for this technique with less blood loss, fewer blood transfusions, minor drainage, and shorter postoperative hospitalization.