Enhancing patient comfort in varicose vein treatment through combined lidocaine and ropivacaine tumescent anesthesia.

Objective: To compare the analgesic effects of specific tumescent anesthetic solutions composed of lidocaine, ropivacaine, or a combination of lidocaine and ropivacaine during endovenous radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of great saphenous vein varicosities. Method: This study included 149 patients with lower limb varicose veins who were admitted to our department between 2019 and 2023. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups: the lidocaine group (Group I), the ropivacaine group (Group II), and the lidocaine + ropivacaine group (Group III). Intraoperative vital signs, intraoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and long-term treatment outcomes were assessed using the venous clinical severity score (VCSS) based on clinical performance. Results: There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, operative time, or blood loss among the three groups (P ≥ 0.05). The differences in the mean arterial pressure and heart rate during surgery in Group II were significantly greater than those in Groups I and III (P < 0.05). The intraoperative VAS scores in Group II were higher than those in Groups I and III (P < 0.05) and at 8 and 12 h postoperatively. There were no significant differences in VCSS among the groups (P ≥ 0.05). Conclusion: The use of a tumescent anesthetic solution composed of lidocaine and ropivacaine significantly improved patient comfort during the perioperative period without affecting surgical outcomes. This formulation can be considered safe and reliable for preparing tumescent anesthesia solutions.

Minimal Pain Tumescent Local Anesthesia Injection for Wide Awake Modified Radical Mastectomy.

The advent of minimal pain tumescent local anesthesia injection has improved patient safety by eliminating the need for sedation for many wide awake operations, especially in patients with significant medical comorbidities. Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) for breast cancer is commonly performed under general anesthesia as it requires the dissection of the entire breast and an ipsilateral axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). General anesthesia has been shown to have a high risk in patients with severe medical comorbidities. We present a case of a 78-year-old male patient who was diagnosed with invasive ductal breast carcinoma, cardiac failure, and other metabolic abnormalities. Taking his comorbidities into account, we performed a wide awake MRM and ALND after tumescent minimal pain local anesthesia injection. The patient experienced the successful procedure safely with minimal discomfort.

L'anesthésie locale par tumescence associée à une douleur minimale a amélioré la sécurité des patients en éliminant la sédation lors de nombreuses opérations éveillées, particulièrement chez les patients qui ont des affections concomitantes importantes. La mastectomie radicale modifiée (MRM) du cancer du sein est souvent effectuée sous anesthésie générale, car elle exige la dissection du sein entier et la dissection des ganglions lymphatiques axillaires (DGLA) ipsilatéraux. Il a été démontré que l'anesthésie générale comporte un risque élevé chez les patients atteints d'affections connexes graves. Les auteurs présentent le cas d'un patient de 78 ans qui a reçu un diagnostic de carcinome canalaire invasif, d'insuffisance cardiaque et d'autres anomalies métaboliques. Compte tenu de ses affections connexes, les médecins ont effectué une MRM et une DGLA après une anesthésie locale par tumescence associée à une douleur minimale. Le patient a subi avec accès une intervention sécuritaire et a éprouvé très peu d'inconfort.

Retrospective Study on Optimizing Breast Augmentation Outcomes in Transgender Patients: A Comprehensive Analysis of Tumescent Local Anesthesia Technique.

BACKGROUND: Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) involves the infusion of a saline solution containing lidocaine and epinephrine into tissues to achieve localized anesthesia and vasoconstriction. While the use of TLA in sub-glandular augmentation mammoplasty has been documented, we present a modified TLA approach for primary sub-muscular breast augmentation in transgender patients based on our experience over the past years. METHODS: Between the years 2014 and 2021, we performed primary sub-muscular breast augmentation on 20 transgender patients under TLA and conscious sedation. The tumescent solution consisted of 25 mL of 2% lidocaine, 8 mEq of sodium bicarbonate, and 1 mL of epinephrine (1 mg/1 mL) in 1000 mL of 0.9% saline solution. Initially, the solution was infiltrated between the pectoral fascia and the mammary gland, and subsequently, during the surgery, under the pectoralis major muscle. RESULTS: The average volume of tumescent solution infiltrated during TLA was 740 mL per breast. There were no reports of adrenaline or lidocaine toxicity, and no cases required a conversion to general anesthesia. Patients experienced no pain or discomfort during the preoperative infiltration or surgical procedure. Reoperations due to short-term complications never occurred. We observed a major complication rate of 5%, represented by 1 hematoma. Long-term complications comprised one case of implant dislocation and one occurrence of dystrophic scar formation. No cases of capsular contracture needing reoperation, asymmetry, and implant rupture occurred. In total, one individual (5%) requested larger implants. Follow-up time ranged from 30 days to 1 years. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, augmentation mammaplasty is a valuable choice for transgender women aiming to enhance their feminine characteristics and alleviate gender dysphoria. It is imperative for patients to conduct thorough research, grasp the potential pros and cons, and consult experienced healthcare professionals in transgender care. Additionally, tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) has proven to be a safe and efficient method for sub-muscular breast augmentation, providing effective pain control with minimal postoperative complications, resulting in high patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Paediatric Post Burn Flexion Contracture Release: Early Outcomes Using Two Bloodless Techniques.

Post burn flexion contracture of the hand in children constitutes a significant proportion of post burn complications. We compared the early clinical outcomes of reconstruction of pediatric post burn flexion contracture of the digits of the hand using tourniquet or tumescent technique. A prospective randomised study of pediatric patients requiring contracture release and wound resurfacing with full thickness skin graft between September 2020 and August 2021. Patients were randomised into groups of either tourniquet or tumescent technique for contracture release. The surface area of graft take and total active motion across joints were the outcome measures. Student t-test, and Chi-squared test were performed. Twenty-two (22) patients were randomised into either group. The mean age of the participants was 6.09 ± 2.41 years, mostly males 31 (72.1%). A grade three (3) flexion contracture was the most common (72.1%). Ninety four (94) digits and one hundred and seventy eight (178) joints were operated on with the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) being the most common (48.9%). The mean surface area of graft take on post operative day ten (10) was significantly higher for the tumescent group than the tourniquet group, p =0.001. The total active motion across the joints at six (6) and nine (9) weeks post operative showed a strong correlation between the total active motion across joints and the technique of release, p=0.004 and 0,001 respectively. Tumescent technique is a feasible alternative to the tourniquet method for post burn flexion contracture release of the digits in the pediatric burned hand.

Enhancing Safety in Tumescent Liposuction: Managing Sedation-Related Respiratory Issues and Serious Complications Under Deep Sedation with the Propofol-Ketamine Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Over the past 4 years, aesthetic surgery, notably liposuction, has substantially increased. Tumescent liposuction, a popular technique, has two variants-true tumescent liposuction (TTL) and semi-tumescent liposuction. While TTL reduces risks, it has limitations. There is no literature reported on semi-tumescent liposuction under deep sedation using the propofol-ketamine protocol, which is proposed as a potentially safe alternative. METHODS: The retrospective analysis covered 8 years and included 3094 patients performed for tumescent liposuction under deep sedation, utilizing the propofol-ketamine protocol. The evaluation of patient safety involved an examination of potential adverse events with a specific focus on respiratory issues related to sedation, including instances of mask ventilation. RESULTS: Among the 3094 cases, no fatalities were recorded. Noteworthy events included 43 mask ventilation instances, primarily occurring in the initial 10 min. Twelve cases experienced surgery cancellation due to various factors, including respiratory issues. Three patients were transferred to upper-level hospitals, while another three required blood transfusions. Vigilant management prevented significant complications, and other adverse events like venous thromboembolism (VTE), fat embolism, severe lidocaine toxicity, and so on were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of 3094 tumescent liposuction cases highlighted the overall safety profile of the propofol-ketamine protocol under deep sedation. The scarcity of severe complications underscores its viability. The study emphasizes the significance of thorough preoperative assessments, careful patient selection, and awareness of potential complications. Prompt interventions, particularly in addressing sedation-related respiratory issues, further contribute to positive outcomes for patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Tumescent technique for split-thickness skin graft donor sites: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is widely used for reconstructive wound management. This review aimed to use level I evidence to determine if tumescent techniques were safe and effective compared to other interventions for STSG donor sites. It was hypothesized that tumescent techniques were safe and effective for STSG donor sites. METHODS: Five databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus) were searched to identify studies concerning the use of tumescent solutions for STSG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and Cochrane's guidelines were strictly followed. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials met the criteria. Included studies were published from 2001 to 2021, with results from 40 of 121 possible queried outcomes and complications. Outcomes included patient demographics, formulations of tumescent solutions, tumescent technique, hemodynamics, pain, perfusion, graft take, healing time, and postoperative complications. The tumescent technique reduced estimated blood loss (standard mean differences [SMD]: -2.68, 95%CI: -3.41 to -1.94; participants = 72; studies = 2; I2 = 96%; p < 0.001), and postoperative analgesic use within 24 hours (SMD: -1.75, 95%CI: -2.09 to -1.41; participants = 202; studies = 2; I2 = 96%; p < 0.001), without increasing graft loss/take (SMD: 0.29, 95%CI: -0.02 to 0.61; participants = 158; studies = 3; I2 = 41%; p = 0.07) and infection (risk ratios [RR]: 0.52, 95%CI: 0.08 to 3.54; participants = 87; studies = 3; I2 = 0%; p = 0.58) complications compared to other interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Level I evidence demonstrated tumescent techniques were safe and effective for STSG donor sites. Tumescent techniques reduced blood loss and postoperative analgesic use within 24 hours without increasing graft loss/take and infection complications compared to other interventions. Inconsistencies between studies limit conclusions and emphasize the need for standardized protocols regarding tumescent solution formulations, techniques, and reported outcomes.

Tumescent local anesthesia in geriatric patients with head and neck skin cancer - a retrospective study of 782 patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Due to frailty, dermatosurgery in the elderly is preferably performed under tumescent local anesthesia, but data is limited. The aim was to evaluate tumescent local anesthesia for skin cancer surgery in the elderly with focus on clinical benefits (treatment processes, pain management) and local postoperative complication risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Investigation of patients ≥ 75 years with inpatient head and neck skin cancer surgery under tumescent local anesthesia. RESULTS: 2,940 procedures in 782 patients (mean age 83.3 years) were performed with the aim of complete tumor resection during the inpatient stay. 3.8 (range: 1-20) interventions were done over an average of 4.9 days (range: 1-28). 43.2% did not require any postoperative analgesia. 53.5% received NSAIDs, 3.3% opioids. Infection (13.6%) was the most common local postoperative complication. Surgical intervention due to bleeding was required in 2.8%. None was hemoglobin relevant or life-threatening. Suture dehiscence and necrosis were rare (0.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Tumescent local anesthesia is an effective method for skin cancer surgery in the elderly. By avoiding general anesthesia, treatment processes can be optimized and anesthesiologic risks minimized. Local postoperative complications are still low and well treatable. The long-lasting analgesia results in a reduced need for analgesics and drug interactions.

The Development and Implementation of an Evidence-Based Tumescent Liposuction Protocol, Online Educational Course for Perioperative Staff, and Discharge Instructions: A Quality Improvement Project.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to improve perioperative management of patients undergoing tumescent liposuction (TL) through the development and implementation of a perioperative evidence-based protocol, educational course for perioperative staff, and patient discharge instructions. DESIGN: The TL protocol was validated using the modified Delphi process. The educational course and discharge instructions used a pre and postimplementation design. METHODS: An evidence-based protocol, an educational course for perioperative staff, and readable discharge instructions for patients undergoing TL were developed in accordance with best practice guidelines. The protocol was validated by subject matter experts at the facility and submitted for adoption. The evidence-based educational course was implemented, and the effectiveness of the course was evaluated for improving providers' knowledge and self-confidence. The evidence-based discharge instructions were implemented and evaluated for patient satisfaction and readability. FINDINGS: Three items were removed from the protocol, 2 items were modified, and 25 items were accepted with no change from modified Delphi analysis. Provider knowledge scores improved from 85.7% ± 16.18 to 97.1% ± 4.88; however, this was not statistically significant (P = .066). There was a trend toward improved confidence scores (P = .180). Overall patient satisfaction scores slightly improved postimplementation; results were not statistically significant (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: All three phases of perioperative care in patients receiving TL were evaluated, reflecting best practice guidelines and successful adoption. There was no statistically significant improvement in provider knowledge, provider self-confidence, or patient satisfaction. A small sample size was a significant limiting factor.

Outcomes of Abdominoplasty in Tumescent Local Anesthesia Combined with Subdural Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Abdominoplasty is a common surgical procedure performed under general anesthesia, and although the use of TLA combined with subdural anesthesia has never been reported in abdominoplasty, it offers several benefits such as safe and effective local anesthesia and vasoconstriction. We outline our experience with the TLA technique for primary abdominoplasty over the last 7 years. METHODS: From 2014 to 2021, TLA and subdural anesthesia have been used in primary abdominoplasty surgeries for 106 patients. The TLA solution consisted of 25 mL of 2% lidocaine, 8 mEq of sodium bicarbonate, and 1 mL of epinephrine (1 mg/1 mL) diluted in 1000 mL of 0.9% saline solution. The solution was then injected with a 2-mm cannula into the subcutaneous adipose tissue in the suprafascial plane. The subdural anesthesia was performed at intervertebral level L1-L2 using Ropivacaine 15/18 mg in 4 ml. RESULTS: Patients aged from 32 to 75 years. The amount of tumescent solution infiltrated ranged between 500 and 1000 mL. Mean surgery time was 70 minutes, and recovery room time averaged at 240 minutes. Major complications related to the surgery were observed in 12.26% of patients, including eight hematomas and five seromas. Two patients experienced wound dehiscence, and no dystrophic scar formation was observed. Eventually, there was no need for a conversion to general anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Tumescent local anesthesia combined with subdural anesthesia is a highly effective and safe method for performing abdominoplasty. This technique has proven to be an excellent choice for primary abdominoplasty, providing significant benefits to patients and surgeons alike due to its safe administration, precise pain management during and after surgery, and minimal postoperative side effects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Application of Femoral Nerve Block in Treating Great Saphenous Vein Insufficiency by Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Punctate Stripping.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block (FNB) in treating great saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency by endovenous radiofrequency ablation (EVRA) combined with punctate stripping (PS). METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study. A total of 135 patients were divided into Group A (59 patients) and Group B (76 patients). All patients received tumescent anesthesia during the operation, and group A received an additional ultrasound-guided FNB before the procedure. Intraoperative and postoperative pain score, the volume of tumescent anesthesia solution (TAS), and other indicators were compared in two groups. RESULTS: Group A had a significantly lower intraoperative pain visual analog scale than group B (2.7 ± 1.2 vs 5.2 ± 1.5, P < 0.001). The volume of TAS in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (198 ± 26.6 ml vs 338 ± 34.7 ml, P < 0.001). Postoperative muscle strength of group A was significantly decreased compared with group B (54.2% vs 3.90%, P < 0.001); no patient had severe limitation of active movements in both groups, and all motor blocks recovered within 24 h. The incidence of skin ecchymosis in group A was lower than that in group B (18.6% vs 46.1%, P = 0.001). The operation duration of the two groups had no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided FNB in treating GSV insufficiency by EVRA combined with PS significantly relieved intraoperative pain and reduced the dosage of TAS and the incidence of skin ecchymosis without increasing the complications of anesthesia or any other surgical complications.

Tumescent anesthesia use for cutaneous malignancies does not impact sentinel node identification but decreases estimated blood loss.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel node biopsy is performed to stage clinically and radiographically occult regional disease in cases of malignancy, including cutaneous cancer such as melanoma. The use of tumescent anesthesia with sentinel node biopsy for cutaneous malignancies has not been well studied. Therefore, we aimed to compare the rate of successful sentinel node identification and estimated blood loss between patients who underwent sentinel node biopsy with and without the use of tumescent anesthesia. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of a prospectively maintained single-institution database of all patients who underwent reconstruction after the extirpation of a cutaneous malignancy over an 18-month period. Patient demographics, tumor histology, and characteristics, indication for and success of sentinel node biopsy, use of tumescent anesthesia, and total estimated blood loss were examined. RESULTS: Sentinel node biopsy was performed in 15 of 39 patients (38.5%) receiving tumescent anesthesia compared with 6 of 26 patients (23.1%) not receiving it (p = 0.19). Sentinel node biopsy had a success rate of 100% in the tumescent and nontumescent anesthesia groups. The mean estimated blood loss in the tumescent anesthesia group was 36.7 mL versus 59.6 mL in the nontumescent anesthesia group (p < 0.001). Complication rates were comparable between the tumescent anesthesia (12.8%) and nontumescent anesthesia (19.2%) groups (p = 0.48). CONCLUSION: The use of tumescent anesthesia in cutaneous malignancy extirpation and immediate reconstruction was not associated with a decreased sentinel node identification rate or change in complication rates. However, tumescent anesthesia was associated with a decrease in the estimated blood loss.

A Novel Two-Step Ultrasound-Guided Technique for Anesthesia and Postsurgery Analgesia in Gluteal Augmentation Surgery.

In recent years, there has been an increase in demand for gluteal augmentation and reshaping surgeries with intramuscular implants which are becoming increasingly popular. Until now, this surgery was mainly performed under general anesthesia, but recently locoregional anesthesia techniques, such as tumescent local anesthesia, are being applied more and more. Today, the use of ultrasound for locoregional anesthesia and analgesia allows us to perform techniques that are increasingly precise and burdened with lower risks. In this report, we present a novel two-step ultrasound-guided technique combining a botox injection in the gluteus maximus four weeks before surgery and tumescent anesthesia with a cluneal nerve block. Furthermore, the combination of anesthetic and analgesic techniques can guarantee a better result both in terms of surgical execution of the intervention and in reducing pain and improving patient comfort in the postoperative period.

Use of Radiofrequency-Assisted Liposuction (BodyTite) for Upper Arms Lifting.

BACKGROUND: Body contouring surgery is increasingly requested by patients, both for aesthetic and post-bariatric purposes. There has also been a rapid increase in demand for noninvasive aesthetic treatments. While brachioplasty is burdened by numerous complications and unsatisfactory scars, and conventional liposuction is unsuitable for all patients, nonsurgical arm remodeling performed with radiofrequency-assisted liposuction (RFAL) allows to effectively treat most of patients, regardless of the amount of fat and ptosis of the skin and avoiding surgical excision. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on 120 consecutive patients who presented to the author's private clinic and required upper arm remodeling surgery for aesthetic purposes or after weight loss. Patients were classified according to the modified classification of El Khatib and Teimourian. Pre- and posttreatment upper arm circumferences were taken after 6 months of follow-up to assess the degree of skin retraction obtained by treating the arm with RFAL. A satisfaction questionnaire regarding the appearance of the arms (Body-Q upper arm satisfaction) was administered to all patients before surgery and after 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: All patients were effectively treated with RFAL, and no cases required conversion to brachioplasty. The average reduction in arm circumference was 3.75 cm at 6 months follow-up, and patients' satisfaction increased from 35 to 87% posttreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Radio frequency is a valid tool to treat most patients with upper limbs skin laxity, with significant aesthetic results and a high degree of patient satisfaction, regardless of the degree of skin ptosis and lipodystrophy of the arm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

[Microcannular liposuction in tumescent anesthesia in lipedema patients: an analysis of 519 liposuctions]. / Mikrokannuläre Liposuktion in Tumeszenzanästhesie beim Lipödem: Eine Analyse von 519 Liposuktionen.

This is a retrospective analysis of all lipedema patients treated by tumescent liposuction at our department in the years 2007-2021: We performed 519 liposuctions in 178 patients with a mean age of 45 ± 15.5 years. By the stage of lipedema the mean age increased significantly, what underlines the concept of lipedema as a chronic progressive disorder. Three-thirds of patients reported at least one comorbidity. The most common were arterial hypertension (32.58%), obesity (24.16%), and hypothyroidism (20.79%). We removed a mean lipoaspirate volume of 4905 ± 2800 mL. A major target for treatment is pain reduction. All patients reported at least a 50% pain reduction after liposuction, while 96 achieved a pain reduction ≥ 90%. The pre-operative pain intensity (p = 0.000) and the lipedema stage (p = 0.032) exerted a significant impact on absolute pain reduction. There was no association of pain reduction to volume loss. The post-operative rate of adverse events was 2.89%. Liposuction in tumescent anesthesia is an effective and safe method to reduce both pain and volume in patients with lipedema.

Lipectomy for madelung disease using tumescent technique: a cross-sectional study.

Madelung's disease is a rare disfiguring disorder that affects both function and esthetic appearance in the head and/or shoulder, neck, and arms regions. Lipectomy is typically necessary but such treatment can encounter difficulties due to the large sizes of the tumors, interspersed with important organs in the surrounding region. In this report, the authors evaluate the effectiveness of using tumescent solution in lipectomy to provide a dual treatment of tissue removal for Madelung disease in the head-and-neck region. Methods: A prospective study and clinical descriptions were conducted on 17 patients undergoing 26 head-and-neck lipectomies. A tumescent solution was injected into the surgical region with a blunt-tip cannula 5-10 min before skin incision. The authors recorded systemic manifestations both during and after surgery; tumescent volume; surgical region; clarity of the operative field; weight of fat removed, and early complications. After surgery, the authors followed the patients from periods of 3 months to 4 years. Results: All 17 male patients had a history of alcoholism. In total, 12 lipectomies for the removal of anterior neck fatty masses and 14 lipectomies for the removal of posterior neck fatty masses were performed. The average amount of tumescent injected was 260.1 ml (range 140-550 ml). Surgery was reported as totally bloodless in 10 (38.5%) operative fields, with minimum bleeding in 12 (46.1%) operative fields, acceptable bleeding in four (15.4%) operative fields. The average surgical time was 175.6 min (range 135-250 min). The removed fatty masses weighed between 250 and 2150 g, with an average of 582.9 g. Early complications were seen in four patients, accounting for 15.4% (2 hematoma, 1 skin necrosis, and 1 seroma). Conclusions: Using tumescent solution in lipectomies to treat Madelung disease in the head and neck area is a simple, safe, and useful technique. The technique helps to create a clean operative field, reduces bleeding, and thereby assists surgeons during the operation.

Clinical analysis of tumescent anesthesia technique combined with superficial fascia rotational atherectomy in axillary bromhidrosis.

Axillary bromhidrosis, which involves the apocrine sweat glands, severely affects adolescents. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of tumescent anesthesia technique combined with superficial fascia rotational atherectomy treatment for axillary bromhidrosis. The present retrospective study included a total of 60 patients with axillary bromhidrosis. These patients were divided into experimental and control groups. Patients in the control group were treated using the tumescent anesthesia technique combined with conventional surgery, while patients in the experimental group were treated using the anesthesia technique combined with superficial fascia rotational atherectomy. The intraoperative blood loss, operation time, histopathological examination and dermatology life quality index (DLQI) score were used to assess the treatment effect. The intraoperative blood loss and operation time were significantly lower in the experimental group compared with the control group. The histopathological results revealed that the sweat gland tissues in experiment group significantly decreased compared with that in control group. Furthermore, there was a significant improvement in axillary odor degree for postoperative patients, and the DLQI scores in experiment group were significantly lower compared with those in control group. The tumescent anesthesia technique combined with superficial fascia rotational atherectomy is a promising approach to treating patients with axillary bromhidrosis.

Back to the future: breast surgery with tumescent local anesthesia (TLA)?

PURPOSE: Breast surgery is usually performed under general anesthesia. Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) offers the possibility to anesthetize large areas with highly diluted local anesthetic. METHODS: In this paper, the implementation, and experiences with TLA in the field of breast surgery are discussed. CONCLUSION: For carefully selected indications, breast surgery in TLA represents an alternative to ITN.

Tumescent local anesthesia versus general anesthesia for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia (GA) is the standard anesthetic approach for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation. Nonetheless, GA is expensive and can be associated with adverse events. Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) has been shown to reduce in-room and procedural times and to decrease post-procedural pain, all of which could result in a reduction in procedure-related costs. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of GA and TLA in patients undergoing S-ICD implantation. METHODS: The present study is a prospective, nonrandomized, controlled study of patients who underwent S-ICD implantation between 2019 and 2022. Patients were allocated to either the TLA or the GA group. We performed a cost analysis for each intervention. As an effectiveness measure, the 0-10 point Numeric Pain Rating Scale at 1, 12, and 24 hours post-implantation was analyzed and compared between the groups. A score of 0 was considered no pain; 1-5, mild pain; 6-7, moderate pain; and 8-10, severe pain. Cost-effectiveness was calculated using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: Seventy patients underwent successful S-ICD implantation. The total cost of the electrophysiology laboratory was higher in the GA group than in the TLA group (median ± interquartile range US$55,824 ± US$29,411 vs US$37,222 ± US$24,293; P < .001), with a net saving of $20,821 when compared with GA for each S-ICD implantation. There was a significant decrease in post-procedural pain scores in the TLA group when compared with the GA group (repeated measures analysis of variance, P = .009; median ± interquartile range 0 ± 3 vs 0 ± 5 at 1 hour, P = .058; 3 ± 4 vs 6 ± 8 at 12 hours, P = .030; 0 ± 4 vs 2 ± 6 at 24 hours, P = .040). CONCLUSION: TLA is a more cost-effective alternative to GA for S-ICD implantation, with both direct and indirect cost reductions. Importantly, these reduced costs are associated with reduced postprocedural pain.