Racial/ethnic disparities in curative-intent treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients among heterogeneous Black populations: US-born Black, Afro-Haitian, West Indian Black, and Hispanic Black.

BACKGROUND: Heterogeneous Black populations encounter significant obstacles in accessing cancer care, yet research on lung cancer treatment disparities remains limited. This study investigates whether the disparity in receiving curative-intent treatment (curative-intent surgery and/or stereotactic body radiation therapy [SBRT]) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs) and total Blacks extends to diverse Black populations, including US-born, Afro-Haitian, West Indian Black, and Hispanic Black individuals. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included all Florida cancer registry early-stage NSCLC cases 2005-2017, linked to individual-level discharge data containing comorbidity and specific treatment details (surgery and/or SBRT). Multivariable logistic regression assessed the association between race/ethnicity and the receipt of curative-intent treatment, while accounting for sociodemographic factors (poverty, age, insurance, and smoking status) and clinical variables. RESULTS: Among 55,655 early-stage NSCLC patients, 71.1% received curative-intent treatment: 72.1% NHW and 59.7% Black (non-Hispanic and Hispanic) individuals. Black patients had 35% lower odds (ORadj, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.59-0.70) of receiving curative-intent treatment compared to NHW patients. ORs varied from 0.57 (95% CI, 0.59-0.70) for Hispanic Black to 0.76 (95% CI, 0.56-1.02) for West Indian Black. Remarkably, Black-White disparities persisted despite the availability of curative treatment options (SBRT) for both high Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) observed among US-born Blacks and surgery for low CCI patients among all other Black subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Pronounced disparities in accessing curative-intent treatments for early-stage NSCLC were evident across all Black subgroups, regardless of treatment availability and comorbidity profile. These findings underscore the need to address Black heterogeneity and prompt further research to rectify treatment disparities in early-stage NSCLC.

Joint Associations of Maternal-Fetal APOL1 Genotypes and Maternal Country of Origin With Preeclampsia Risk.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVES: Preeclampsia, which disproportionately affects Black women, is a leading cause of preterm delivery and risk for future hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) kidney risk alleles, common among Black individuals, contribute substantially to CKD disparities. Given the strong link between preeclampsia and CKD, we investigated whether maternal and fetal APOL1 risk alleles can jointly influence preeclampsia risk, and explored potential modifiers of the association between APOL1 and preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: Nested case-control study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 426 Black mother-infant pairs (275 African Americans and 151 Haitians) from the Boston Birth Cohort. EXPOSURE: Maternal and fetal APOL1 risk alleles. OUTCOMES: Preeclampsia. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Logistic regression models with adjustment for demographic characteristics were applied to analyze associations between fetal and maternal APOL1 risk alleles and risk of preeclampsia and to investigate the effects of modification by maternal country of origin. RESULTS: Fetal APOL1 risk alleles tended to be associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia, which was not statistically significant in the total genotyped population. However, this association was modified by maternal country of origin (P<0.05 for interaction tests): fetal APOL1 risk alleles were significantly associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia among African Americans under recessive (odds ratio [OR], 3.6 [95% CI, 1.3-9.7]; P=0.01) and additive (OR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.1-2.6]; P=0.01) genetic models but not in Haitian Americans. Also, maternal-fetal genotype discordance at the APOL1 locus was associated with a 2.6-fold higher risk of preeclampsia (P<0.001) in African Americans. LIMITATIONS: Limited sample size in stratified analyses; self-reported maternal country of origin; pre-pregnancy estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria data in mothers were not collected; unmeasured confounding social and/or environmental factors; no replication study. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the hypothesis that fetal APOL1 kidney risk alleles are associated with increased risk for preeclampsia in a recessive mode of inheritance in African Americans and suggests that maternal-fetal genotype discordance is also associated with this risk. These conclusions underscore the need to better understand maternal-fetal interaction and their genetic and environmental factors as contributors to ethnic disparities in preeclampsia.

An exploration of differences in sleep characteristics between Mexico-born US immigrants and other Americans to address the Hispanic Paradox.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Decreased sleep duration and quality are associated with poor health. Given that Mexico-born US immigrants (MI) often have favorable health status relative to the general US population (USALL), we tested the hypothesis that MI have better sleep as compared to USALL and to Mexican-Americans (MA) born in the US. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of a stratified multistage probability sample of 18 years and older civilian non-institutionalized USALL enrolled in NHANES during 2005-2006. Age-adjusted population prevalence rates and adjusted odd ratios of short habitual sleep time (SHST) and insomnia were calculated using weighted analyses. SETTING: Computer assisted personal bilingual (English/Spanish) interviews in the participants' home using a sleep questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: 5160 USALL participants, including 1046 MA, of whom 620 were MI. RESULTS: In logistic regression models unadjusted and adjusted for socioeconomic characteristics, health related behavior risk factors, health status, and depression, MI status was significantly associated with lower odds of SHST (OR = 0.7, 95%CI [0.6-0.9]), insomnia (OR = 0.3, 95%CI [0.2-0.5]), and sleep-associated functional impairments (OR = 0.4, 95%CI [0.2-0.8]). In MA males, MI status was associated with reduced odds of SHST < 7 h/weeknight and insomnia symptoms. Cultural changes measured by increased levels of English compared to Spanish language spoken at home were associated with an increased risk of poor sleep in MA men in univariate models, and may partially explain better sleep in MI men compared to their US-born counterparts. CONCLUSION: Compared to the general US poplulation, Mexican-born US immigrants have more favorable sleep, possibly contributing to their lower reported risk of diabetes, hypertension, CVD, and all-cause mortality (the "Hispanic Paradox").