RESUMO
Ecological monitoring programs typically aim to detect changes in the abundance of species of conservation concern or which reflect system status. Coral reef fish assemblages are functionally important for reef health and these are most commonly monitored using underwater visual surveys (UVS) by divers. In addition to estimating numbers, most programs also collect estimates of fish lengths to allow calculation of biomass, an important determinant of a fish's functional impact. However, diver surveys may be biased because fishes may either avoid or are attracted to divers and the process of estimating fish length could result in fish counts that differ from those made without length estimations. Here we investigated whether (1) general diver disturbance and (2) the additional task of estimating fish lengths affected estimates of reef fish abundance and species richness during UVS, and for how long. Initial estimates of abundance and species richness were significantly higher than those made on the same section of reef after diver disturbance. However, there was no evidence that estimating fish lengths at the same time as abundance resulted in counts different from those made when estimating abundance alone. Similarly, there was little consistent bias among observers. Estimates of the time for fish taxa that avoided divers after initial contact to return to initial levels of abundance varied from three to 17 h, with one group of exploited fishes showing initial attraction to divers that declined over the study period. Our finding that many reef fishes may disperse for such long periods after initial contact with divers suggests that monitoring programs should take great care to minimise diver disturbance prior to surveys.
RESUMO
Reef fish assemblages in the Caribbean are under increasing pressure from human activities. Inadequate enforcement of legislation coupled with unreliable and data-poor landings in Tobago have led to the unregulated exploitation of reef fish for decades. This study addresses the lack of data on major reefs. Visual observations of fish fauna were conducted from November 2011-May 2013 at open access reef sites (Speyside, Charlotteville, Culloden, Arnos Vale, Mt. Irvine, La Guira, Kilgwyn, Plymouth and Black Rock) and one protected area (Buccoo Reef Marine Park). Belt transects surveys were used to determine fish density, species diversity and abundance at the 10-15m depth contour. Fish sizes were converted to biomass using the length-weight relationship of fish W=aLb. Most fish assemblages were dominated by small herbivores (<15cm), in particular Pomacentridae and Scaridae. Few large predators (>40cm) e.g. Serranidae, were noted, which is indicative of fishing pressure. MDS ordination identified three fish assemblages: i) northeastern, ii) southwestern and iii) intermediate. The northwestern cluster (Speyside and Charlotteville) were most representative of reef fish assemblages across the entire island, and exhibited the highest species richness, diversity and biomass. However, the southwestern cluster the highest numerical abundance. The marine protected area contained higher fish biomass, abundance, diversity and richness, but it was only representative of reef fish assemblages on the southwest of the island and not the entire Tobago. Research on the reef fishery, particularly spear fishing, is recommended to determine impact.
Los ensamblajes de peces de arrecife en el Caribe están bajo una creciente presión de las actividades humanas. La ejecución inadecuada de la legislación, junto con los desembarques poco fiables y con escasez de datos en Tobago han llevado a una explotación sin reglas durante décadas. Este estudio aborda la falta de datos sobre las comunidades de peces de arrecife en los principales arrecifes. Las observaciones visuales se llevaron a cabo desde noviembre 2011 hasta mayo 2013 en sitios de acceso a los arrecifes abiertos (Speyside, Charlotteville, Culloden, Arnos Vale, el monte Irvine, La Guira, Kilgwyn, Plymouth y Negro Rock) y un área protegida (El parque Buccoo Marine Reef). Se utilizaron encuestas para determinar la densidad de peces, la diversidad y abundancia de especies a 10-15m de profundidad del contorno. El tamaño de los peces se convirtió a biomasa utilizando la relación talla- peso de los peces W=aLb. La mayoría de las comunidades de peces son dominadas por pequeños herbívoros (<15cm), en particular Pomacentridae y Scaridae. Pocos depredadores grandes (>40cm), por ejemplo Serranidae, se observó, lo que es indicativo de la presión de pesca. El análisis de escala multidimensional identificó tres conjuntos distintos de peces indicados como i) del noreste, ii) al suroeste y iii) grupos intermedios. El grupo del noroeste (Speyside y Charlotteville ) es más representativo de comunidades de peces de arrecife en toda la isla, y mostró la mayor riqueza de especies, diversidad y biomasa. Sin embargo, se observó la abundancia más alta de peces en el grupo del suroeste. El área marina protegida contenia mayor biomasa, abundancia, diversidad y riqueza de peces, pero era el único representante de las asociaciones de peces arrecifales en el suroeste de la isla y no de todo Tobago. Se recomienda determinar los impactos de la pesca en los arrecifes, particularmente con el uso de arpón.
