Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 2024 Aug 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39090423

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we examined the reason and prognosis of unplanned excision on synovial sarcoma. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 54 patients diagnosed with synovial sarcoma between March 2013 and February 2021, including 26 cases of unplanned excision surgery. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they underwent unplanned excision. Then, factors such as gender, age, tumor size, tumor location, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging, unplanned excision, time of onset, duration of disease, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, amputation, local recurrence factors, and death were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: The results of a multivariate analysis revealed that the AJCC staging is an independent factor for patient prognosis. When patients were divided into two groups, those who had undergone unplanned excision and those who had not, statistical analysis revealed that there was no difference of survival between two groups, but tumor size and AJCC staging had statistical difference. To further explore the influences of unplanned excision, we performed propensity score analysis with 1:1 matching using the nearest neighbor matching method to balance the covariates between the two groups. There was no difference of survival between two groups after propensity score matching. CONCLUSION: Unplanned excision is commonly performed in synovial sarcoma and do not impact the prognosis after extensive resection.

2.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(2)2024 Jan 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38275885

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas are a group of rare neoplasms which can be mistaken for benign masses and be excised in a non-oncologic fashion (unplanned excision). Whether unplanned excision (UE) is associated with worse outcomes is highly debated due to conflicting evidence. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Main outcomes analyzed were five-year overall survival (OS), five-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), amputation rate and plastic reconstruction surgery rate. Risk ratios were used to compare outcomes between patients treated with planned and unplanned excision. RESULTS: We included 16,946 patients with STS, 6017 (35.5%) with UE. UE was associated with worse five-year LRFS (RR 1.35, p = 0.019). Residual tumor on the tumor bed was associated with lower five-year LRFS (RR = 2.59, p < 0.001). Local recurrence was associated with worse five-year OS (RR = 1.82, p < 0.001). UE was not associated with a worse five-year OS (RR = 0.90, p = 0.16), higher amputation rate (RR = 0.77, p = 0.134), or a worse plastic reconstruction surgery rate (RR = 1.25, p = 0.244). CONCLUSIONS: Unplanned excision of Soft Tissue Sarcomas and the presence of disease in tumor bed after one were associated with worse five-year LRFS. Tumor bed excision should remain the standard approach, with special consideration to the presence of residual disease.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA