Could incremental haemodialysis be a new standard of care? A suggestion from a long-term observational study.

Introduction: The term incremental haemodialysis (HD) means that both dialysis dose and frequency can be low at dialysis inception but should be progressively increased, to compensate for any subsequent reduction in residual kidney function. Policy of the Matera Dialysis Center is to attempt an incremental start of HD without a strict low-protein diet in all patients choosing HD and with urine output (UO) >500 ml/day. The present study aimed at analyzing the results of this policy over the last 20 years. Subjects and methods: The dataset of all patients starting HD between January 1st, 2000 and December 31st, 2019 was retrieved from the local electronic database. Exclusion criteria were: urine output <500 ml/day or follow-up <3 months after the start of the dialysis treatment. Results: A total of 266 patients were retrieved; 64 of them were excluded from the study. The remaining 202 patients were enrolled into the study and subdivided into 3 groups (G1, G2 and G3) according to the frequency of treatment at the start of dialysis: 117 patients (57.9%) started with once-a-week (1HD/wk) (G1); 46 (22.8%) with twice-a-week (2HD/wk) (G2); 39 (19.3%) with thrice-a-week (3HD/wk) dialysis regimen (G3). Patients of G1 remained on 1HD/wk for 11.9 ±14.8 months and then transferred to 2HD/wk for further 13.0 ±20.3 months. Patients of G2 remained on 2HD/wk for 16.7 ±23.2 months. Altogether, 25943 sessions were administered during the less frequent treatment periods instead of 47988, that would have been delivered if the patients had been on 3HD/wk, thus saving 22045 sessions (45.9%). Gross mortality of the entire group was 12.6%, comparable to the mean mortality of the Italian dialysis population (16.2%). Survival at 1 and 5 years was not significantly different among the 3 groups: 94% and 61% (G1); 83% and 39% (G2); 84% and 46% (G3). Conclusions: Our long-term observational study suggests that incremental HD is a valuable option for incident patients. For most of them (80.7%) it is viable for about 1-2 years, with obvious socio-economic benefits and survival rates comparable to that of the Italian dialysis population. However, randomized controlled trials are lacking and therefore urgently needed. If they will confirm observational data, incremental HD will be a new standard of care.

Routine Kt/V and Normalized Protein Nitrogen Appearance Rate Determined From Conductivity Access Clearance With Infrequent Postdialysis Serum Urea Nitrogen Measurements.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVES: Conventional monitoring of hemodialysis dose is implemented using urea kinetic modeling based on single-pool Kt/V, which requires both pre- and postdialysis serum urea nitrogen (SUN) measurements. We compared this conventional approach to one in which Kt/V is calculated using conductivity clearance, thereby reducing the need for regular postdialysis SUN measurements. STUDY DESIGN: Comparative study of 2 diagnostic tests. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Prevalent patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis for at least 2 years for whom both urea reduction ratio (URR) and average conductivity clearance (Kecn) were measured. TESTS COMPARED: During the initial 8 months (baseline interval), average Kecn and URR were used to calculate a median patient-specific, modeled, calibration solute distribution volume (Vcal). During months 9 to 16 (period 1) and 17 to 24 (period 2), Kt/V was conventionally computed using URR and also by a new method using Vcal and Kecn without postdialysis SUN values. We examined the percentage error between these 2 methods of calculating Kt/V. OUTCOMES: Concordance between the 2 methods of calculating Kt/V. RESULTS: Among 1,093 patients, mean individual-level median single-pool Kt/V values derived using the conventional method during the baseline interval, period 1, and period 2 were 1.62±0.24 (SD), 1.66±0.24, and 1.67±0.24, respectively. During periods 1 and 2, patient-level median Kt/V values derived using Kecn were 1.64±0.24 and 1.65±0.24, respectively. Percent differences between patient-level median values of Kt/V (conductivity minus conventional URR methods) were-0.63%±7.7% and-0.75%±8.4% for periods 1 and 2. Normalized protein nitrogen appearance were comparable between the 2 methods. LIMITATIONS: Data were collected over 2 years. Study was limited to in-center hemodialysis patients dialyzed 3 times per week. Dialysis session length was not adjusted for treatment interruptions. CONCLUSIONS: A new method of calculating Kt/V based on Kecn that requires fewer postdialysis SUN measurements provided diagnostic data comparable to those from conventional use of URR and has the potential to avoid errors related to postdialysis blood sampling and measurement.

Incremental hemodialysis, a valuable option for the frail elderly patient.

Management of older people on dialysis requires focus on the wider aspects of aging as well as dialysis. Recognition and assessment of frailty is vital in changing our approach in elderly patients. Current guidelines in dialysis have a limited evidence base across all age group, but particularly the elderly. We need to focus on new priorities of care when we design guidelines "for people not diseases". Patient-centered goal-directed therapy, arising from shared decision-making between physician and patient, should allow adaption of the dialysis regime. Hemodialysis (HD) in the older age group can be complicated by intradialytic hypotension, prolonged time to recovery, and access-related problems. There is increasing evidence relating to the harm associated with the delivery of standard thrice-weekly HD. Incremental HD has a lower burden of treatment. There appears to be no adverse clinical effects during the first years of dialysis in presence of a significant residual kidney function. The advantages of incremental HD might be particularly important for elderly patients with short life expectancy. There is a need for more research into specific topics such as the assessment of the course of frailty with progression of chronic kidney disease and after dialysis initiation, the choice of dialysis modality impacting on the trajectory of frailty, the timing of dialysis initiation impacting on frailty or on other outcomes. In conclusion, understanding each individual's goals of care in the context of his or her life experience is particularly important in the elderly, when overall life expectancy is relatively short, and life experience or quality of life may be the priority.

[Inadequate doses of hemodialysis. Predisposing factors, causes and prevention]. / Dosis de hemodiálisis subóptima. Factores predisponentes, causas y prevención.

Patients receiving sub-optimal dose of hemodialysis have increased morbidity and mortality. The objectives of this study were to identify predisposing factors and causes of inadequate dialysis, and to design a practical algorithm for the management of these patients. A cross-sectional study was conducted. Ninety patients in chronic hemodialysis at Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba were included, during September 2015. Twenty two received sub-optimal dose of hemodialysis. Those with urea distribution volume (V) greater than 40 l (72 kg body weight approximately) are 11 times more likely (OR = 11.6; CI 95% = 3.2 to 51.7, p < 0.0001) to receive an inadequate dose of hemodialysis, than those with a smaller V. This situation is more frequent in men (OR = 3.5; 95% CI 1.01-15.8; p = 0.0292). V greater than 40 l was the only independent predictor of sub-dialysis in the multivariate analysis (OR = 10.3; 95% CI 2.8-37; p < 0.0004). The main cause of suboptimal dialysis was receiving a lower blood flow (Qb) than the prescribed (336.4 ± 45.8 ml/min vs. 402.3 ± 28.8 ml/min respectively, p < 0.0001) (n = 18). Other causes were identified: shorter duration of the session (n = 2), vascular access recirculation (n = 1), and error in the samples (n = 1). In conclusion, the only independent predisposing factor found in this study for sub-optimal dialysis is V greater than 40 l. The main cause was receiving a slower Qb than prescribed. From these findings, an algorithm for the management of these patients was developed.

Dosis de hemodiálisis sub-óptima: Factores predisponentes, causas y prevención / Inadequate doses of hemodialysis. Predisposing factors, causes and prevention

Los pacientes que reciben dosis sub-óptima de hemodiálisis tienen mayor morbimortalidad. El objetivo del trabajo fue identificar los factores predisponentes y las principales causas de diálisis inadecuada y diseñar un algoritmo para aplicar en estos casos. Se realizó un estudio de corte transversal. Se incluyeron 90 pacientes en hemodiálisis crónica, en el Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, en septiembre 2015. Veintidós recibieron una dosis sub-óptima de hemodiálisis. Aquellos con un volumen de distribución de urea (V) mayor a 40 l (72 kg de peso corporal aproximadamente), tienen 11 veces mayores posibilidades (OR = 11.6; IC95% = 3.2-51.7, p < 0.0001) de recibir una dosis inadecuada de hemodiálisis que los que tienen un V menor a esa cifra; y los hombres 3 veces más probabilidad que las mujeres (OR = 3.5; IC95% 1.0-15.8; p = 0.0292). El V mayor a 40 l fue el único factor independiente predictor de sub-diálisis en el análisis multivariado (OR = 10.3; IC95% 2.8-37; p = 0.0004). La principal causa de diálisis sub-óptima fue recibir un flujo sanguíneo (Qb) menor al prescripto (336.4 ± 45.8 vs. 402.3 ± 28.8 ml/min, respectivamente, p < 0.0001) (n = 18). Otras causas fueron: menor duración de la sesión (n = 2), recirculación del acceso vascular (n = 1) y error en las muestras (n = 1). En conclusión, el único factor independiente predisponente de sub-diálisis fue el V mayor a 40 l. La principal causa de diálisis inadecuada fue recibir un Qb menor al prescripto. A partir de estos hallazgos, se desarrolla un algoritmo para aplicar en estos casos.

Patients receiving sub-optimal dose of hemodialysis have increased morbidity and mortality. The objectives of this study were to identify predisposing factors and causes of inadequate dialysis, and to design a practical algorithm for the management of these patients. A cross-sectional study was conducted. Ninety patients in chronic hemodialysis at Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba were included, during September 2015. Twenty two received sub-optimal dose of hemodialysis. Those with urea distribution volume (V) greater than 40 l (72 kg body weight approximately) are 11 times more likely (OR = 11.6; CI 95% = 3.2 to 51.7, p < 0.0001) to receive an inadequate dose of hemodialysis, than those with a smaller V. This situation is more frequent in men (OR = 3.5; 95% CI 1.01-15.8; p = 0.0292). V greater than 40 l was the only independent predictor of sub-dialysis in the multivariate analysis (OR = 10.3; 95% CI 2.8-37; p < 0.0004). The main cause of suboptimal dialysis was receiving a lower blood flow (Qb) than the prescribed (336.4 ± 45.8 ml/min vs. 402.3 ± 28.8 ml/min respectively, p < 0.0001) (n = 18). Other causes were identified: shorter duration of the session (n = 2), vascular access recirculation (n = 1), and error in the samples (n = 1). In conclusion, the only independent predisposing factor found in this study for sub-optimal dialysis is V greater than 40 l. The main cause was receiving a slower Qb than prescribed. From these findings, an algorithm for the management of these patients was developed.

Daily Dialysis and Flexible Schedules: How to Assess Kt/V and EKRc ?

Despite the growing interest in daily hemodialysis (DHD), logistic and economic factors limit its dissemination. Not the least of these factors is the lack of uniform criteria for measuring efficiency. From November 1998 to November 2000, 19 patients were on DHD in our unit. The dialysis prescription was bicarbonate buffer; 6 sessions per week; 2 - 3 hours; blood flow 250 - 350 mL/min; individual K, HCO3 , and Na levels; membrane 1.6 - 2 m2 (polysulfone, polycarbonate). The prescription represented the minimum dialysis requirement; patients were free to add up to 30 minutes per session, further increase or any decreases needed confirmation by the caregivers. The aim of the study was to assess Kt/Vurea variability in this clinical setting, and to identify the minimum number of dialysis sessions required to obtain a reliable estimate of weekly Kt/Vurea [relative error (RE) < 10%]. We studied 169 dialysis sessions in 13 clinically stable patients on DHD for ≥ 3 months, with ≥ 3 Kt/Vurea measurements within 2 weeks (median: 10; range: 3 - 32 sessions), tested in the same laboratory. To assess variability, we employed the simplest formula (the Lowrie Kt/Vurea ), the widely used Daugirdas II formula, and the derived single-pool equivalent renal clearance (EKRc ), according to Casino. The variability of Kt/Vurea per session was high (Lowrie: RE = 2.5% - 22.1%; Daugirdas II and EKRc : RE = 3.6% - 24%). Averaging several dialysis sessions leads to a more reliable estimate of weekly efficiency (6 sessions: RE = 0; 3 sessions, Lowrie formula: Kt/Vurea RE = 1.1% - 9.7%; Daugirdas II and EKRc : RE = 1.6% - 10.6%). In patients with wide time variations, variability may be lower if weekly efficiency is determined on the basis of "average hourly Kt/Vurea ," which is calculated by dividing Kt/Vurea by the number of hours in the studied sessions, and then multiplying by the hours of dialysis performed in the whole week (Lowrie formula, Kt/Vurea : RE = 4.8% - 16.6% for 1 session, 2.1% - 7.3% for 3 sessions). Once again, the RE decreases sharply when data from 3 sessions are considered. Therefore, for flexible DHD, we suggest averaging the data from ≥ 3 sessions for weekly Kt/Vurea assessment.