Think before you pop: Outcomes of non-operative management of ureteroceles.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Ureteroceles are often diagnosed antenatally and incidentally and treated in a minimally invasive fashion with endoscopic puncture. Recent literature suggests that observation, or non-operative management, is an effective and viable management option in select patients with ureteroceles and certain radiologic findings, however there is no consensus on how to best select patients for non-operative management. OBJECTIVE: To 1) determine if pediatric ureteroceles managed non-operatively require less or sooner secondary surgical intervention than those managed with up-front incision, 2) describe characteristics of success and failure in pediatric ureteroceles managed non-operatively, and 3) identify risk factors associated with receiving intervention and time to intervention. RESULTS: Of 287 ureteroceles, 65 (23%) were managed non-operatively and underwent secondary surgical intervention less frequently (9% vs. 34%, P < 0.01) and later (median age 40 vs. 20 months) than those managed with puncture. Successful non-operative management was associated with fewer comorbidities, smaller ureterocele size, absence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and high-grade VUR, single collecting system, lesser degree of hydronephrosis, ipsilateral MCDK and intravesical location. For all ureteroceles, high-grade VUR, duplex system, and female sex were associated with shorter time to secondary intervention (intervention after initial management). DISCUSSION: In the largest retrospective review of ureterocele management, smaller ureterocele size, absence of high-grade VUR, single system, ipsilateral MCDK and minimal hydronephrosis were factors that increased the efficacy of non-operative management of select pediatric ureteroceles. Furthermore, time to event analysis showed that non-operative management did not predispose patients to sooner secondary intervention (Figure). Lack of a standardized protocol for ureterocele management is a limitation of this single institution retrospective study as it introduces selection bias to the results, however few patients with low risk characteristics underwent puncture and no high risk patients were observed. CONCLUSION: Smaller ureterocele size, absence of high-grade VUR, single system, ipsilateral MCDK and minimal hydronephrosis are factors that may increase the efficacy of non-operative management of select pediatric ureteroceles, which may delay or avoid secondary surgical intervention.

Sonographic Differentiation From Pseudoureterocele of Ectopic Ureter and Ureterocele in Pediatric Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Ectopic ureter and ureterocele need an adequate treatment plan and different surgical interventions. However, some cases appear as intravesical cystic lesions on ultrasound, with ectopic ureter sometimes reported as pseudoureterocele. This study aimed to describe the sonographic imaging findings of intravesical cystic lesions to differentiate between pseudoureterocele and ureterocele. METHODS: Nineteen patients with duplex collecting system and intravesical cystic lesions that were classified into pseudoureterocele and ureterocele based on the surgical findings were included. The ultrasound findings compared between the 2 groups were as follows: intravesical lesion with/without a covered muscular layer, presence/absence of notch sign within the lesion, and dynamic change in the appearance of intravesical cystic lesions using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The lesions in 3 patients were classified as pseudoureterocele due to ectopic ureter and the remaining 16 as ureterocele. Significant differences were observed in intravesical lesions with/without a muscular layer (pseudoureterocele versus ureterocele = 3/0 versus 3/13, P = .021) and the presence or absence of a notch sign within the vesical cystic lesion (pseudoureterocele versus ureterocele = 3/0 versus 3/13, P = .021) between the groups. Although there was a tendency for the dynamic change in the appearance of intravesical cystic lesions to be more detectable in cases with ureterocele than in pseudoureterocele, the difference was not significant (0/3 versus 11/5, P = .058). CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic findings, including bladder muscular layer location and the presence of a notch sign within the cystic lesion, were useful in differentiating pseudoureterocele and ureterocele in intravesical cystic lesions in pediatric patients with a duplex collecting system.

Endoscopic incision of ureterocele.

Ureterocele is a cystic dilatation of the intravesical submucosal ureter, with an obstructed orifice. Endoscopic treatment is one of the most common option for surgical treatment. In intravesical ureterocele, the punctures must be made just above the junction between the ureterocele and the bladder floor. We commonly use a 8-9.8 Fr cystoscope, with a 5 Fr working channel, a metallic needle for bulking agent injection 3.7 Fr. In selected cases we also use electric or laser probes to decompress the ureterocele. When evidence of decompression is verified and vesicoureteral reflux is excluded, antibiotic prophylaxis is stopped. If, despite decompression, a large ureterocele is subsequently obstructing the bladder neck a surgical excision is necessary. Forty-four patients (92%) were treated endoscopically. Ureterocele puncture was performed with a metallic needle for bulking agent injection in 30 cases (63%), with a laser fiber in 7 cases (15%), with an electrified ureteral catheter in 4 cases (8%), and with Bugbee in 3 cases (6%). A success rate after one procedure was achieved in 40 children (83%). Adequate opening of the ureterocele with complete decompression of the reno-ureteral system is the goal of endoscopic treatment. An overaggressive incision or puncture could result in an increased chance of secondary vesicoureteral reflux.

Surgical patterns in the endoscopic management of pediatric ureterocele: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the results of endoscopic ureterocele treatments as well as the effects of ureterocele location (intravesical vs. ectopic) and anatomy (single vs. duplicated system) on treatment outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Following the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards, several medical databases as well as Google Scholar were searched comprehensively. Studies describing secondary operation outcomes for endoscopic transurethral incision and puncture were included. Studies were required to compare patients according to ureterocele location (intravesical or ectopic) and anatomy (single or duplex system) or preoperative reflux. Meta-analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-analysis (CMA) software. RESULTS: A total of 83 studies entered this systematic review consisting of 3022 patients. According to the meta-analysis of 16 studies, the risk ratio (RR) of reoperation after ureterocele incision was significantly higher in patients with ectopic vs. intravesical ureteroceles (RR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.89-3.11; P < 0.001; I2: 14.89%). Also, a higher reoperation rate was reported in patients with duplex system ureteroceles (DSU) vs. single system ureteroceles (SSU) with little heterogeneity based on 9 studies. (RR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.60-3.91; P < 0.001; I2: 13.83%). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that ectopic ureteroceles and duplex systems are associated with higher reoperation rates after endoscopic procedures.

Voiding cystourethrography in patients undergoing endoscopic decompression of duplex system ureteroceles: to do or not to do?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) in patients with duplex system ureterocele (DSU) undergoing endoscopic decompression (ED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 75 consecutive patients with DSU undergoing ED [median (range) age, 6 (1-148) months]. Patients were divided into 3 groups, 33 with a VCUG showing vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) before ED (VUR-group), 22 with a VCUG negative for VUR (No-VUR-group), and 20 who did not undergo a VCUG (No-VCUG-group). Secondary surgery (SS) rate was compared among groups. RESULTS: Groups were comparable for baseline characteristics. SS rate was 82% (27/33) in VUR-group vs. 32% (7/22) in the No-VUR-group (p = 0.0001), and 25% (5/20) in the No-VCUG-group (p = 0.001 vs. VUR-group, and 1 vs. No-VUR-group). In the VUR-group, 9 patients underwent preemptive endoscopic treatment of VUR during ED and SS rate was 44% (4/9) vs. 96% (23/24) in the remainder, p= 0.003. In the No-VCUG-group, a VCUG was performed during follow-up in 9/15 patients and showed reflux in all, although only 2 of these developed a (single) urinary tract infections. CONCLUSIONS: SS rate was significantly higher in patients with preoperative VUR. Instead, it was not significantly different between patients without VUR and those who did not undergo a VCUG before ED, despite all the latter who underwent a VCUG during follow-up had evidence of VUR generally in the absence of symptoms. In our opinion, a VCUG could be limited to patients developing symptoms after ED. If a VCUG is performed before ED, a preemptive treatment of VUR should be taken into consideration.

Ureteral duplicity with a left ureterocele: a case report.

An intravesical ureterocele is a rare condition in which a terminal ureter terminates in a cystic dilation of the bladder. We present the case of a 42-year-old female who presented with irritative lower urinary tract symptoms and left lower back pain. Computed tomography (CT) urography revealed ureteral duplication with a ureterocele complicated by upper tract obstruction. Treatment involved endoscopic ureterocelotomy, which successfully relieved symptoms and resolved renal obstruction.

The Radiographic Appearances of Bilateral Ureteroceles and Their Management in an Adult Patient Presenting With Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections.

A ureterocele is a congenital abnormality in which there is abnormal dilatation of the distalmost portion of the ureter, as it enters the urinary bladder. Patients present with frequent urinary tract infections, urinary retention, cyclical abdominal pains, failure to thrive, and hematuria. Ureteroceles are often diagnosed on antenatal ultrasound and sometimes postnatally on ultrasounds done in the setting of a urinary tract infection. This case describes a 51-year-old female who presented with recurrent urinary tract infections. Subsequent imaging with ultrasound, intravenous urogram, and computed tomography demonstrated features typical for bilateral ureteroceles.

Ureterocele as differential diagnosis of hydrosalpinx-an interesting case from the clinical practice.

Hydrosalpinx is a common condition in women of reproductive age that correlates with infertility. A ureterocele is a dilatation of the terminal ureter within the bladder and/or urethra that occurs seldomly in adults, but can sonographically be mistaken for a hydrosalpinx. We report of a 29-year-old patient (G2/P1) who was referred in our department with secondary infertility and suspicion of hydrosalpinx. Intraoperatively, no hydrosalpinx could be visualized. Postoperatively, an intravesical cystic mass was detected, alongside a second-degree urinary retention. Sonographically, a double kidney on the left side and an accentuated calyx system could be diagnosed. Ureteroceles seem to represent a rare but still possible differential diagnosis in suspected hydrosalpinx, given the similar sonographic presentation of both conditions.

Personalized Surgical Management Offers Full Restitution and Unimpaired Quality of Life to Patients with Duplex Kidneys and Associated Pathologies: 30-year Follow-up at a Tertiary Referral Center.

Background: Duplex kidneys may be associated with additional pathologies with an indication for surgery. Various surgical approaches have been described. However, little is known about long-term outcomes and quality of life (QoL) for these patients. Objective: To present long-term outcomes and QoL data up to 30 yr after surgical treatment of duplex kidneys and associated pathologies. Design setting and participants: We collected clinical and operative data for all patients who underwent surgery for complicated duplex kidney at our institution from 1990 to 2018. All patients were invited for a follow-up examination or telephone interview. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We evaluated renal function, clinical outcomes, residual dilation of the upper urinary tract, and health-related QoL. Results and limitations: Of the 176 patients included, 173 were available for follow-up (mean 140.5 mo). Surgical treatment involved an upper-tract, lower-tract, or combined approach in 11%, 56%, and 33% of cases, respectively. Rates of perioperative complications (8%) and secondary surgery (10%) were low. Overall, 95% of our patients achieved full restitution. Renal function was preserved in all cases, with recurrent urinary tract infections reported by just 2% and urinary incontinence by 1%. Good health-related QoL was reported by 98% of patients. Those without full restitution included six patients who underwent total nephrectomy and two boys who underwent multiple surgeries and urinary diversion. Our results are limited by their retrospective nature, including partly incomplete data sets. Conclusions: Management of duplex kidneys and associated pathologies is complex and highly individual. By planning a personal approach for each patient it is possible to achieve full bodily integrity and good QoL for most of these patients. Patient summary: Almost all patients undergoing surgery for duplex kidneys and associated pathologies will lead a life without body impairment and good quality of life.This trial is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register as DRKS00022542.

Duplex Kidney in Adults: a Systematic Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this study, we describe a rare case of a male with a duplex renal collecting system with ectopic ureter insertion into the prostate who presented with sepsis and required urgent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. This study offers urologists and emergency care practitioners a great overview of the variety of manifestations, anatomic differences, and therapeutic approaches for similar patients. RECENT FINDINGS: modified reconstructive strategy could be a method of choice when addressing particular anatomies, such as incomplete duplex kidneys with ureteropelvic junction obstruction in both upper and lower poles when the obstruction is close to the confluence of the two ureters. There is a spectrum of acute presentations and management strategies in adult patients with duplex collecting systems. The majority of patients presenting with obstruction and infection are managed surgically with hemi-nephrectomy; stable patients who present with less extensive anomalies were managed conservatively or with ureteral dilatation or deroofing.

Unraveling recurrent urinary tract infection in adulthood: a rare case report of unilateral partial duplex collecting system with ureterocele.

Introduction: Duplication of the renal collecting system, known as the duplex collecting system, is a common congenital anomaly of the urinary tract. It can be partial or complete and affects 0.7-4% of the population, with a higher incidence in females. Ureteroceles are cystic dilations of the distal ureter and are often asymptomatic, particularly in adults. Case presentation: The authors present a case of a newly diagnosed partial duplex collecting system of the left kidney and left intravesical ureterocele, which was diagnosed for the first time at the age of 47 years, along with a history of symptoms suggestive of recurrent urinary tract infection and a urethral calculus which was surgically managed 5 years ago. Clinical discussion: The presence of a duplex collecting system can be observed even in males, with the possibility of recurrent urinary tract infection and the rare occurrence of an intravesical ureterocele. While ureteroceles are typically considered a congenital condition, they can also be diagnosed in adults. Conclusion: A partial duplex collecting system of the left kidney with left intravesical ureterocele in the age of 47 years in a male is a rare occurrence. Diagnosis and management of such urological cases can be challenging especially in a resource limited setting, which can be mitigated by awareness of unusual presentations, proper antenatal care, and access to proper diagnostic tools.

A Rare Case of Obstructive Uropathy in an Elderly Male From Rural India - A Case Report.

Ureterocele is a rare congenital anomaly often believed to be caused due to incomplete dissolution of the Chwalla membrane. In this pathology, the distal end of the ureter is invaginated in the bladder and is dilated. We present a case of an 81-year-old male from rural India who came with complaints of hematuria and was diagnosed with ureterocele.

In Utero Treatment of Obstructive Ureterocele.

Lower urinary tract obstruction consists of a heterogeneous group of conditions in which the normal urethral egress of urine from the fetal bladder is impaired. The most frequent diagnoses are posterior urethral valves, urethral atresia, and less common obstructive ureterocele. We report a case of a fetus with prenatal diagnosis of obstructive ureterocele who presented progressive bilateral hydronephrosis. A fetal cystoscopy with laser ablation was performed.

Retrograde incision from orifice (RIO) technique for endoscopic incision of ureterocele: 15 years of outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Management of obstructing ureterocele often includes endoscopic transurethral incision (TUI) that can be challenging secondary to uncertainty in anatomic landmarks with risk of serious complications. To this end, we innovated a technique using predictable landmarks that begins endoscopic incision at the ureterocele orifice and extends retrograde proximal to the bladder neck (Figure). OBJECTIVE: With over 15 years of experience in performing this retrograde incision from orifice (RIO) technique, we aimed to examine post-operative outcomes and risk of surgical failure after RIO compared to traditional TUI techniques for ureteroceles. We hypothesized that clinical outcomes after RIO would be superior to traditional endoscopic approaches to decompression of obstructing ureterocele in infants. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of patients ≤12 months old who underwent TUI ureterocele at our institution between 2007 and -2021 was conducted. Pre-, intra- and post-operative characteristics were compared between patients who underwent RIO vs non-RIO TUI. Primary outcome was post-incision febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI). Secondary outcome was a composite failure measure of fUTI, secondary surgery, de novo bladder outlet obstruction, or vesicoureteral reflux. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were fitted to compare the time-to-event risk of primary and secondary outcomes between groups. RESULTS: Ninety patients with 92 ureteroceles were included (49 RIO, 43 non-RIO). Median follow-up from TUI was 33 months. RIO had a shorter median operative duration (27 vs 35 min, p = 0.021). Primary and secondary outcomes were similar between groups (fUTI: 29% RIO vs 19% non-RIO, p = 0.27; composite failure 54% RIO vs 69% non-RIO, p = 0.15). In multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, there was no significant difference in risk of fUTI (RIO aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.38-2.54, p = 0.97) or composite failure (RIO aHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.45-1.44, p = 0.46) between TUI techniques. DISCUSSION: RIO technique for TUI ureterocele is attractive in that it uses predictable anatomic landmarks making it simple to perform. In analyzing this 15-year institutional experience of TUI ureterocele, RIO showed similar success to non-RIO endoscopic incisions. This study is a retrospective, non-randomized, single-institutional study over 15 years and is therefore subject to change in surgeon practice over time and variable practices between providers. CONCLUSIONS: Given comparable success and durability over time to other TUI ureterocele techniques, and with the advantage of operator ease using consistent anatomic landmarks, RIO is a worthy option for endoscopic ureterocele decompression.

Clinical outcomes and risk factor analysis of early endoscopic puncture decompression for ureterocele associated with duplex kidney in children: a single-center retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to analyze the clinical outcomes of treating duplex system ureteroceles with early endoscopic puncture decompression and to identify the risk factors related to outcomes to help guide future work. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients with ureteroceles with duplex kidney that were treated with early endoscopic puncture decompression. Charts were reviewed for demographics, preoperative imaging, surgical indications, and follow-up data. Recurrent febrile urinary tract infections (fUTIs), de novo vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), persistent high-grade VUR, unrelieved hydroureteronephrosis, and the need for further intervention were considered unfavorable outcomes. Gender, age at surgery, BMI, antenatal diagnosis, fUTIs, bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), type of ureterocele, ipsilateral VUR diagnosed before surgery, simultaneously upper-pole moiety (UM) and lower-pole moiety (LM) obstruction, the width of ureter affiliated to UM, and maximum diameter of ureterocele were all considered potential risk factors. A binary logistic regression model was used to identify the risk factors of unfavorable outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients with ureteroceles related to duplex kidney underwent endoscopic holmium laser puncture from 2015 to 2023 at our institution. After a median follow-up of 21.6 months, unfavorable outcomes developed in 17 patients (47.2%). Three patients underwent ipsilateral common-sheath ureter reimplantation and one patient underwent laparoscopic ipsilateral upper to lower ureteroureterostomy combined with recipient ureter reimplantation. Three patients underwent laparoscopic upper-pole nephrectomy. Fifteen patients suffered from recurrent UTIs were treated with oral antibiotics and eight of them were diagnosed de novo VUR according to voiding cystourethrography (VCUG). In univariate analysis, patients with simultaneously UM and LM obstruction (P = 0.003), fUTIs before surgery (P = 0.044), and ectopic ureterocele (P = 0.031) were more likely to have unfavorable outcomes. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that ectopic ureterocele (OR = 10.793, 95% CI 1.248-93.312, P = 0.031) and simultaneously UM and LM obstruction (OR = 8.304, 95% CI 1.311-52.589, P = 0.025) were identified as independent factors for unfavorable outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that early endoscopic puncture decompression is not a preferred but an available treatment option to release BOO or to cure refractory UTIs. It was easier to fail if the ureterocele was ectopic or simultaneously UM and LM obstruction existed. Gender, age at surgery, BMI, antenatal diagnosis, fUTIs, bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), ipsilateral VUR diagnosed before surgery, the width of ureter affiliated to UM, and maximum diameter of ureterocele were not significantly related to the success rate of early endoscopic punctures.

Unilateral renal agenesis, blind-ended ureter, and ectopic ureterocele inserting into the seminal vesicle: A very rare developmental association.

Congenital renal anomalies are common imaging findings and can often be detected antenatally. In some cases, these anomalies may go undetected and present in adulthood. We report a very rare case of unilateral renal agenesis in a 22-year-old male associated with an ipsilateral dilated blind-ended ureter that ectopically inserted into the seminal vesicle. This unique combination of developmental anomalies can lead to a variety of clinical presentations and requires careful monitoring and management.

Embryology, Treatment, and Outcomes of Ureteroceles in Children.

A ureterocele is a congenital cystic dilatation of the intravesical ureter that may affect either a single system kidney or the upper pole of a duplex system. The position of ureteral orifice correlates with function of associated renal moiety. Ureteroceles associated with good renal function and prompt drainage or ureteroceles associated with no renal function can be managed nonoperatively. Endoscopic puncture of ureteroceles addresses most cases; iatrogenic reflux may rarely require secondary surgery. Robot-assisted laparoscopic upper pole nephroureterectomy and ureteroureterostomy procedures are rarely associated with complications.

Prolapse of ectopic ureterocele in the vulva.

Ureterocele is rare urinary malformation. We reported a 12-month-old girl case with a prolapsed ectopic ureterocele in the vulva. Urinary catheterization was used as an emergency treatment to minimize the ureterocele. The patient later benefited from an upper polar hemi-nephrectomy, which helped to resolve the issue partially. She sought treatment for the prolapse again a Three month later, this time ureterecelectomy with ureteral reimplantation was employed. The non-consensual management of this malformation must be initiated as soon as possible to prevent complications. The first treatment goal was to decompress the prolapsed ureterocele and remove it endoscopically.