Antithrombotic Strategies According to Age: Insights from the AUGUSTUS Trial.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of antithrombotic strategies by age in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome and/or percutaneous coronary intervention in AUGUSTUS. METHODS: Patients were stratified into 3 age groups: <65, 65-74, and ≥75 years. Outcomes of interest were major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, major bleeding, death or rehospitalization, and ischemic events. Treatment effects of apixaban vs. vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and aspirin vs. placebo were assessed across age groups using Cox models. RESULTS: Of 4614 patients, 1267 (27.5%) were <65, 1802 (39.0%) were 65-74, and 1545 (33.5%) were ≥75 years. Apixaban was associated with lower rates of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding than VKA (<65: HR 0.69 [0.47-1.00]; 65-74: HR 0.57 [0.43-0.75]; ≥75: HR 0.81 [0.63-1.04]). Death or hospitalization occurred less often with apixaban, regardless of age. No differences were observed in rates of ischemic events between apixaban and VKA according to age. Aspirin was associated with higher rates of bleeding than placebo (<65: HR 1.67 [1.15-2.43]; 65-74: HR 2.32 [1.73-3.10]; ≥75: HR 1.69 [1.31-2.19]). Rates of death or rehospitalization and ischemic events were similar among patients receiving aspirin or placebo across age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Apixaban was associated with greater absolute reduction in bleeding than VKA in older age groups, reflecting their higher hemorrhagic risk. Aspirin increased bleeding in all age groups vs. placebo. Our findings support the use of apixaban plus a purinergic receptor P2Y12(P2Y12) inhibitor without aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation and recent acute coronary syndrome/percutaneous coronary intervention, regardless of age.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation and bioprosthetic valves: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal anticoagulation strategy for patients with bioprosthetic valves and atrial fibrillation remains uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis using updated evidence comparing direct anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with bioprosthetic valves and atrial fibrillation. METHODS: Medline and Embase were searched through March 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies investigating the outcomes of DOAC therapy and VKA therapy in patients with bioprosthetic valves and atrial fibrillation. The outcomes of interest were all-cause death, major bleeding, and stroke or systemic embolism. RESULTS: Our analysis included 4 RCTs and 6 observational studies enrolling a total of 6405 patients with bioprosthetic valves and atrial fibrillation assigned to a DOAC group (n = 2142) or a VKA group (n = 4263). Pooled analysis demonstrated the similar rates of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.05; P = .18; I2 = 0%) in the DOAC and VKA groups. However, the rate of major bleeding was significantly lower in the DOAC group (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.89; P = .006; I2 = 0%), whereas the rate of stroke or systemic embolism was similar in the 2 groups (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.44-1.17; P = .18; I2 = 39%). CONCLUSIONS: DOAC might decrease the risk of major bleeding without increasing the risk of stroke or systemic embolism or all-cause death compared with VKA in patients with bioprosthetic valves and atrial fibrillation.

CoaguChek® XS versus standard laboratory prothrombin time for anticoagulant monitoring in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: The standard of care for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Prothrombin time, and its corresponding international normalized ratio (INR), is the laboratory test routinely performed to assess anticoagulation. Self-management of VKA therapy using point-of-care (POC) devices seems to be an attractive option. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of a POC device (CoaguChek XS) in APS patients by comparing it with venous laboratory INR. Furthermore, we analyzed whether other clinical and laboratory features could interfere with the CoaguChek XS results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a single-center cross-sectional study with 94 APS patients from a tertiary rheumatology clinic performed from August 2014 to March 2015. The comparison between CoaguChek XS and venous laboratory INR results was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (r) followed by the Bland-Altman test. A paired t-test was also applied. A difference of up to ±0.5 INR unit between the two systems was considered clinically acceptable. RESULTS: The mean CoaguChek-INR was 2.94 ± 1.41 and venous laboratory INR was 2.43±0.86, with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.95. Categorizing INR values in ranges (INR <2, INR 2-3, INR 3-4, and INR >4), we found that the INR >4 group presented a lower correlation (r = 0.64) compared to the other ranges (p < 0.05). Although both methods were highly correlated, CoaguChek XS showed higher values than the venous laboratory INR, with an increased average of 0.42 ± 0.54. Therefore, we proposed a simple linear regression model to predict the venous laboratory INR values, using results obtained from CoaguChek XS. A difference ≤0.5 INR unit between the two systems was observed in 57.4% of patients, and the aPL profile did not influence the results. CONCLUSION: Although CoaguChek XS and venous laboratory INR demonstrated a good linear correlation in the group of INR ≤4, extra caution should be taken in APS patients, since a reasonable proportion of patients can present differences in INR results that are not acceptable. We do not recommend routine POC in APS patients.

Self-perceived quality of life of primary antiphospholipid syndrome patients using vitamin K antagonist.

PURPOSE: Primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) is a chronic autoimmune disorder clinically characterized by thromboembolic events or obstetric complications. Prolonged anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is the treatment of choice for PAPS patients with thrombosis. However, the efficacy of VKA therapy depends on laboratory monitoring, dose adjustment, adequate lifestyle and adherence to treatment. Difficulties with VKA therapy can affect patients' self-perceived health related quality of life (HRQOL). This study aims to evaluate PAPS patients' HRQOL, therapy adherence and knowledge of treatment. METHODS: A general Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale (DASS) were used to access APS-patients self-perceived HRQOL. Treatment adherence was measured by the Treatment Measure Adhesion (TMA) - oral anticoagulant version instrument, and knowledge of VKA treatment was measured using the MedTake test. RESULTS: 66 PAPS patients using VKA were assessed. 63% of them were female; the mean age was 41.9 years old, approximately 60% had unprovoked venous thrombosis and one third of the patients had recurrent thrombotic events. The most impacted domain of DASS was "psychological impacts" and the factors associated to anticoagulation related poor HRQOL were: female sex, presence of arterial thrombosis and INR lability. Using the SF-36 instrument, PAPS-patients self-perceived HRQOL was poorer than that of the general Brazilian population and was associated with female sex and presence of cardiovascular risk factors. CONCLUSION: Despite the high adherence to treatment and knowledge of VKA therapy, self-perceived HRQOL is poor in patients with PAPS and is mainly affected by VKA therapy. Searching for better treatment options is warranted.

Use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in Colombia: A descriptive study using a national administrative healthcare database.

PURPOSE: We aimed to describe time-trends in the use of NOACs among a group of ambulatory patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in Colombia and to describe treatment patterns and user characteristics. METHODS: Using the Audifarma S.A administrative healthcare database in Colombia, we identified 10 528 patients with NVAF aged at least 18 years between July 2009 and June 2017 with a first prescription (index date) for apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban (index NOAC) and followed them for at least year (max, 8.0 years, mean 2.2 years). We described patient characteristics, NOAC use over time, and the dose of the first NOAC prescription. RESULTS: A total of 2153 (20.5%) patients started on apixaban, 3089 (29.3%) on dabigatran and 5286 (50.2%) on rivaroxaban. The incidence of new users of apixaban and rivaroxaban increased over study years while for dabigatran it decreased. Mean age at the index date was: 78.5 years (apixaban), 76.5 years (dabigatran), 76.0 years (rivaroxaban). The percentage of patients started NOAC therapy on the standard dose was: apixaban 38.0%, dabigatran 30.9%, rivaroxaban 56.9%. The percentage still prescribed their index NOAC at 6 months was apixaban 44.6%, dabigatran 51.4%, rivaroxaban 52.7%. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (>80% in each NOAC cohort). CONCLUSION: During the last decade, the incidence of NOAC use in patients with NVAF affiliated with a private healthcare regime in Colombia has markedly increased. Future studies should evaluate whether the large number of patients with NVAF starting NOAC treatment on a reduced dose are done so appropriately.

Inclusion in the World Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines of Non-Vitamin K Anticoagulants for Treatment of Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Step Towards Reducing the Burden of Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) represent a paradigm shift in the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) with major practice guidelines around the world recommending NOACs over vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for initial treatment of AF for stroke prevention. Here we describe the evidence collated and the process followed for the successful inclusion of NOACs into the 21st WHO Model List of Essential Medicines (EML). Individual NOACs have been reported to be non-inferior or superior to warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism in eligible AF patients with a reduction in the risk of stroke and systemic embolism and a lower risk of major bleeding in patients with non-valvular AF compared with warfarin in both RCTs and real-world data. The successful inclusion of NOACs in the WHO EML is an important step forward in the global fight against cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, especially in low- and middle-income countries, where the burden of disease is high and limited access to diagnosis and treatment translates into a higher burden of morbidity, mortality, and economic costs.

Anticoagulation Therapy by Age and Embolic Risk for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation in Mexico, an Upper-Middle-Income Country: The CARMEN-AF Registry.

Background: Documenting the patterns of oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) is essential to prevent thromboembolic complications of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Objective: To report the patterns of OAT according to age and thromboembolic risk in patients included in CARMEN-AF, a nationwide registry of NVAF in Mexico, an upper middle-income country. Material and methods: There were 1,423 consecutive patients ≥18 years old and with at least one thromboembolic risk factor enrolled in the CARMEN-AF Registry at their regular clinical visit during a three-year period. They were analyzed according to 1) age, 2) AF type, and 3) CHA2DS2-VASc score. Results: Overall, 16.4% of patients did not receive antithrombotic treatment, 19.4% received antiplatelet drugs (APD), 29.2% vitamin K antagonists (VKA), and 34.6% direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). With increasing age, the proportion of subjects treated with VKA decreased significantly from 36.2% in subjects <65 years to 22.5% in those ≥75 years old (P <0.0001). Concomitantly, an increase in both APD and no antithrombotic treatment was observed with increasing age. DOAC were prescribed equally among all age groups (34.2% in <65, 36.0% in 65-74, and 33.9% in ≥75). According to the type of AF, VKA use was more common in patients with permanent AF (32.7%). A lower use of DOAC was observed in high thromboembolic risk subjects (33.6% in CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2) compared with the moderate risk group (41% in CHA2DS2-VASc = 1). Conclusions: VKA use for NVAF in Mexico decreased in relation to increasing age. The proportion of DOAC therapy was the same in all age groups. Nevertheless, elderly patients with high thromboembolic risk received a suboptimal thromboprophylaxis. These data could help to improve gaps in the implementation of global guidelines. Clinical trial registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02334852. Highlights: CARMEN-AF is a nationwide multi-centric registry seeking to bridge the data gap on anticoagulation therapy for NVAF in Mexico.Elderly patients are more prone to receive suboptimal OAT for NVAF.DOAC were less frequently used in high thromboembolic risk patients (CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2).

XANTUS-EL: A real-world, prospective, observational study of patients treated with rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in Eastern Europe, Middle East, Africa and Latin America.

BACKGROUND: The prospective, observational XANTUS study demonstrated low rates of stroke and major bleeding in real-world rivaroxaban-treated patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) from Western Europe, Canada and Israel. XANTUS-EL is a component of the overall XANTUS programme and enrolled patients with NVAF treated with rivaroxaban from Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EEMEA) and Latin America. METHODS: Patients with NVAF starting rivaroxaban for stroke prevention were consecutively recruited and followed for 1 year, at approximately 3-month intervals, or for ≥30 days after permanent rivaroxaban discontinuation. Primary outcomes were major bleeding, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included stroke, non-central nervous system systemic embolism (non-CNS SE), transient ischaemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI) and non-major bleeding. All major outcomes were centrally adjudicated. RESULTS: Overall, 2064 patients were enrolled; mean age ±â€¯standard deviation was 67.1 ±â€¯11.32 years; 49.3% were male. Co-morbidities included heart failure (30.9%), hypertension (84.2%), diabetes mellitus (26.5%), prior stroke/non-CNS SE/TIA (16.2%) and prior MI (10.7%). Mean CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 2.0, 3.6 and 1.6, respectively. Treatment-emergent event rates were (events/100 patient-years, [95% confidence interval]): major bleeding 0.9 (0.5-1.4); all-cause mortality 1.7 (1.2-2.4); stroke/non-CNS SE 0.7 (0.4-1.2); any AE 18.1 (16.2-20.1) and any serious AE 8.3 (7.0-9.7). One-year treatment persistence was 81.9%. CONCLUSIONS: XANTUS-EL confirmed low stroke and major bleeding rates in patients with NVAF from EEMEA and Latin America. The population was younger but with more heart failure and hypertension than XANTUS; stroke/SE rate was similar but major bleeding lower.

Edoxaban for Venous Thromboembolism Treatment-The New Kid on The Block for Latin America. A Practical Guide.

Edoxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor (FXa), is the fourth direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) approved for clinical use in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Latin America, following global approvals for this indication. Edoxaban features some particular characteristics when compared to the previously approved DOACs. This review summarizes the main properties of edoxaban, the outcomes results of its pivotal global clinical trials and the peculiar clinical features of this compound. This practical guide aims to help Latin America clinicians understand edoxaban, its proper indication and its use for the appropriate patients with VTE.

Genotype-guided warfarin therapy: current status.

Warfarin pharmacogenomics has been an extensively studied field in the last decades as it is focused on personalized therapy to overcome the wide interpatient warfarin response variability and decrease the risk of side effects. In this expert review, besides briefly summarizing the current knowledge about warfarin pharmacogenetics, we also present an overview of recent studies that aimed to assess the efficacy, safety and economic issues related to genotype-based dosing algorithms used to guide warfarin therapy, including randomized and controlled clinical trials, meta-analyses and cost-effectiveness studies. To date, the findings still present disparities, mostly because of standard limitations. Thus, further studies should be encouraged to try to demonstrate the benefits of the application of warfarin pharmacogenomic dosing algorithms in clinical practice.

Stroke Prevention with Oral Anticoagulants: Summary of the Evidence and Efficacy Measures as an Aid to Treatment Choices.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an established risk factor for a first or recurrent stroke. Despite proven efficacy in preventing stroke in patients with AF, warfarin is underused, partly due to safety concerns. Recent randomized trials have shown that non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) such as dabigatran (a direct thrombin inhibitor) and apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban (factor Xa inhibitors) are not only non-inferior or superior to warfarin but also demonstrate a decreased risk of cerebrovascular bleeding among patients with AF and moderate to high risk of stroke. Additionally, NOACs have an advantage of requiring no monitoring of the international normalized ratio compared with warfarin. This review summarizes the published literature on NOACs for the primary and secondary prevention of ischemic strokes, with an emphasis on the expected absolute benefits from the introduction of such agents. As compared with warfarin, NOACs significantly reduce the risk of hemorrhagic stroke, and only dabigatran (150 mg twice daily) was found to significantly reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. However, measures of relative benefits from medical interventions do not immediately provide the estimated benefit to be derived from an individual patient, something best done by considering the expected absolute benefit. The number needed to treat (NNT) is presented for various outcomes in the phase 3 trials of NOACs. Despite the important progress achieved with the introduction of NOACs, the availability of at least four agents with different efficacy and safety performances in comparison with warfarin prompts the question of whether any of these agents is preferable to another. It is hoped that future studies on the efficacy, safety, and economic performance of NOACs will further allow for rational choices within this important therapeutic class. Meanwhile, the NNT may be a valid metric to be considered by clinicians faced with the need to make such choices.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome On Cloud (APSOnCloud): web-based monitoring of oral anticoagulation.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by recurrent thromboses and fetal losses with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. The main treatment to prevent recurrent thrombotic events is oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonist (VKA), which requires frequent monitoring and dosage adjustments. Outpatient anticoagulation monitoring has its limitations, such as patients spending long hours between the testing procedure and waiting for the results to be adjusted. To optimize this adjustment and to improve APS patients-doctors relationship, we developed a website to help monitor APS patients, called Antiphospholipid Syndrome On Cloud or APSOnCloud. To test it, since March 2014 to March 2016, we registered 20 patients with APS that have inserted 132 international normalized ratio (INR) values. Sixty two percent were out of range and it took on average 7 hours for the doctor in charge to adjust these values. The mean time in therapeutic range was 58.1%. Our preliminary experience in monitoring VKA oral anticoagulation on APSOnCloud suggests that patients with APS might benefit from this web-based monitoring.

Hemothorax due to warfarin overdose / Hemotórax secundário a intoxicação varfarínica

The vitamin K antagonists are the most widely used oral anticoagulant. Although bleedings are common side effect, development of hemothorax is rare. Most cases are associated with impairment in pleura or parenchyma structural alteration in the presence of INR values outside therapeutic range. We report the case of a patient with rheumatoid arthritis presenting with massive hemothorax under anticoagulation with warfarin and present an overview of the main aspects related to warfarin overdose. A 58-year-old woman was evaluated due to transvaginal bleeding and dry cough. In her past medical history, rheumatoid arthritis, smoking and deep venous thrombosis was reported. She had clinical signs of anemia and pulmonary auscultation revealed no lung sounds in the lower third of the right hemithorax. The hemoglobin was 7,2g/dL and the international normalized ratio (INR) was greater than 9. The tomographic study showed pleural effusion and pulmonary embolism in the left pulmonary artery with chronic characteristics, but was negative for pulmonary infarct. The patient received crystalloids, vitamin K and transfusions of blood products. Thoracentesis demonstrated presence of hemothorax. After recovery and hospital discharge, an elective pleural biopsy reveals pleural tissue without histological changes and no signs of malignancy. Despite the fact that hemothorax is a rare complication in patients on oral anticoagulants, this occurrence can be life threatening. The evidence of pleural effusion in these patients should always raise the suspicion of hemothorax. Comorbidities that may affect the lung may be predisposing factors for the occurrence of hemothorax, but the roll of pleural and parenchymal diseases of the lung is not fully clarified and investigation of such conditions should be encouraged.

Os antagonistas da vitamina K são os anticoagulantes orais mais utilizados. Embora sangramentos sejam efeitos colaterais comuns, o desenvolvimento de hemotórax é raro. A maioria dos casos está associada ao comprometimento da pleura ou alteração estrutural do parênquima na presença de valores de INR fora da faixa terapêutica. Relatamos o caso de uma paciente com artrite reumatóide e em anticoagulação com varfarina que apresentou-se com hemotórax maciço. Apresentamos também uma visão geral sobre os principais aspectos relacionados à intoxicação varfarínica. Uma mulher de 58 anos de idade foi avaliada devido a sangramento transvaginal e tosse seca. Em seu histórico médico, artrite reumatóide, tabagismo e trombose venosa profunda foram relatados. Ela tinha sinais clínicos de anemia e a ausculta pulmonar revelou ruídos abolidos no terço inferior do hemitórax direito. A hemoglobina era de 7,2g/dL e a relação normatizada internacional (RNI) maior do que 9. O estudo tomográfico mostrou derrame pleural e embolia na artéria pulmonar esquerda com características crônicas, mas foi negativo para infarto pulmonar. O paciente recebeu cristalóides, vitamina K e transfusões de hemocomponentes. A toracocentese demonstrou presença de hemotórax. Após a recuperação e alta hospitalar, uma biópsia pleural eletiva revelou tecido pleural sem alterações histológicas e sem sinais de malignidade. Apesar do fato de que hemotórax é uma complicação rara em pacientes que tomam anticoagulantes orais, esta ocorrência pode ser fatal. A evidência de derrame pleural nesses pacientes deve sempre levantara suspeita de hemotórax. Co-morbidades que podem afetar o pulmão podem ser fatores predisponentes para a ocorrência de hemotórax, mas o papel de doenças pleurais e parenquimatosas do pulmão não está totalmente esclarecido e a investigação de tais condições deve ser incentivada.

A novel approach indirectly comparing benefit-risk balance across anti-thrombotic therapies in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Anti-thrombotic reduces thromboembolic events but increases bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We evaluated the benefit-risk of anti-platelet and anti-coagulant therapies, weighing these conflicting effects of treatment. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials in patients with AF were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through April 2014. We performed a stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis, which allowed us to compute a comprehensive benefit-risk profile. In the primary analysis, we used prior established rankings of mortality, intracranial haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, major extracranial haemorrhage, and systemic embolism based on utility functions. In sensitivity analyses, we explored: (i) rankings based on costs, (ii) bleeding ranked higher than thromboembolism, and (iii) thromboembolism ranked higher than bleeding events. RESULTS: 100 913 patients (21 studies) were allocated to placebo/control, aspirin and/or clopidogrel, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), or new oral anti-coagulants (NOACs). Based on utility, NOACs were better than VKA or anti-platelet therapy; dabigatran 150 mg was ranked highest (21% chance of being best). Ranked by cost, the 3 factor Xa inhibitors were very similar (16-18% chance of being best). When haemorrhagic events were weighted more than ischaemic events, edoxaban 30 mg was ranked higher (22%), while rivaroxaban (23%) was most preferred when ischaemic events were rated worse than haemorrhagic events. CONCLUSION: New oral anti-coagulants had a more favourable benefit-risk profile across a wide range of assumptions regarding the relative importance of clinical events. Differences between NOACs were modest and depended upon the order of ranking of clinical events.