Incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients with vulvar carcinoma undergoing vulvectomy with or without lymphadenectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following radical surgery for vulvar carcinoma remains poorly characterized, and recommendations for postoperative chemoprophylaxis are varied. Our objective was to assess the incidence of postoperative VTE in patients undergoing surgery for vulvar carcinoma and to determine if VTE incidence differs by radical vulvectomy with or without lymph node assessment. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients with a diagnosis of vulvar cancer undergoing radical vulvectomy with or without lymph node assessment from 2012 to 2020. Clinical characteristics and 30-day incidence of VTE as well as other postoperative outcomes were abstracted. Variables were compared using Chi-square test and Fischer's exact test, as well as Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank sum tests where appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 1672 patients underwent radical vulvectomy for vulvar carcinoma. 11 patients (0.7%) experienced postoperative VTE within 30 days of surgery. The incidence of VTE was similar when radical vulvectomy was performed alone or with lymph node dissection by any method (p = 0.116). Longer operative times (p = 0.033) and greater postoperative length of stay (p = 0.001) were associated with increased risk of postoperative VTE. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of postoperative VTE is low in patients undergoing radical vulvar surgery in this national cohort. Inguinofemoral lymph node dissection by any method does not appear to be a risk factor for VTE when compared to radical vulvectomy alone. Further research is needed to determine if extended VTE prophylaxis is beneficial in this population.

Enhanced Recovery after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.

The objective of this study was to review on the influence of enhanced rehabilitation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery outcomes, specifically focusing on length of hospital stay, hospital costs, pain, morbidity, and patient satisfaction. Following the PRISMA model and using PubMed as a source, eight articles pertaining to prolapse surgery and two articles concerning vaginal hysterectomies were selected, all published between 2014 and 2021. These studies revealed no significant difference in terms of operating time, intra- and post-operative complications, intra-operative blood loss and post-operative pain scores before and after the introduction of the ERAS program. Only one study noted a difference in readmission rates. There was, however, a noticeable decrease in intra-operative and post-operative intravenous intakes, opioid administration, length of stay, and overall hospital costs with the adoption of ERAS. Additionally, with ERAS, patients were able to mobilize more rapidly, and overall patient satisfaction significantly improved.

Rapidly progressing vulvar soft tissue infection as a result of severe hypogammaglobulinemia following CAR T-cell therapy.

•Consider immune dysfunction in rapidly progressing soft tissue infections refractory to medical or surgical management.•Vulvar ulcers may rapidly progress to severe complications in patients with immune dysfunction after CAR T-cell therapy.•As CAR T-cell therapy use expands, recognition of unique toxicities is an important consideration.

Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature regarding the outcomes following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions. This is a common procedure among gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists, and a body of evidence is warranted to guide clinical care and future research. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the rate of wound complications following simple vulvar excision and to identify the risk factors for these outcomes. Our secondary objectives were to determine the rates of (1) positive margins and (2) occult carcinoma in the cases of vulvar dysplasia. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of the patients who underwent simple vulvar excision procedures for suspected premalignant or benign lesions between June 2016 and February 2020. Our primary outcome was the rate of composite wound complications, including wound separation or breakdown, infection, or hematoma. Our secondary outcomes were the incidence of (1) margins positive for residual dysplasia and (2) occult minimally invasive carcinoma. The Fisher exact tests and chi-squared tests were used to compare the categorical variables and logistic regression models and independent student t tests were used for continuous variables, as appropriate. Multivariate stepwise selection and multiple logistic regression was performed to evaluate the risk factors for complications and generate the odds ratios. RESULTS: Of the 338 patients included in the study, 143 (42.3%) experienced wound complication. Most of these complications were wound separation or breakdown (n=134, 39.6%), followed by infection (n=22, 6.5%), and hematoma (n=4, 1.2%). On multivariate analysis, the presence of high-grade vulvar dysplasia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-3.15), longer specimen diameter (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.05), and lesion location on the perineum (adjusted odds ratio, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-3.66) were independent risk factors. With high-grade vulvar dysplasia, the rate of positive margins was 50.2% (114/227) and that of occult microinvasive carcinoma was 17.2% (39/227). Notably, the primary and secondary outcomes were similar among gynecologic oncologists and gynecologists. CONCLUSION: Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions are common. Select groups may benefit from anticipatory counseling and future interventional studies to prevent complication. The incidence of positive surgical margins and occult minimally invasive carcinoma is also high, reflecting the challenging nature of treating vulvar disease.

Guidelines for vulvar and vaginal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society recommendations.

This is the first collaborative Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society guideline for optimal perioperative care for vulvar and vaginal surgeries. An Embase and PubMed database search of publications was performed. Studies on each topic within the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vulvar and vaginal outline were selected, with emphasis on meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective cohort studies. All studies were reviewed and graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. All recommendations on the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery topics are based on the best available evidence. The level of evidence for each item is presented.

Guidelines for vulvar and vaginal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society recommendations

This is the first collaborative Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society guideline for optimal perioperative care for vulvar and vaginal surgeries. An Embase and PubMed database search of publications was performed. Studies on each topic within the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vulvar and vaginal outline were selected, with emphasis on meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective cohort studies. All studies were reviewed and graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. All recommendations on the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery topics are based on the best available evidence. The level of evidence for each item is presented.

Associated Lichen Sclerosis Increases the Risk of Lymph Node Metastases of Vulvar Cancer.

The most important prognostic factor in vulvar cancer is inguinal lymph node status at the time of diagnosis, even in locally advanced vulvar tumors. The aim of our study was to identify the risk factors of lymph node involvement in these women, especially the impact of lichen sclerosis (LS). We conducted a retrospective population-based cross-sectional study in two French referral gynecologic oncology institutions. We included all women diagnosed with a primary invasive vulvar cancer. Epithelial alteration adjacent to the invasive carcinoma was found in 96.8% (n = 395). The most frequently associated was LS in 27.7% (n = 113). In univariate analysis, LS (p = 0.009); usual type VIN (p = 0.04); tumor size >2 cm and/or local extension to vagina, urethra or anus (p < 0.01), positive margins (p < 0.01), thickness (p < 0.01) and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (p < 0.01) were significantly associated with lymph node involvement. In multivariate analysis, only LS (OR 2.3, 95% CI [1.2-4.3]) and LVSI (OR 5.6, 95% CI [1.7-18.6]) remained significantly associated with positive lymph node. LS was significantly associated with older patients (p = 0.005), anterior localization (p = 0.017) and local extension (tumor size > 2 cm: p = 0.001). LS surrounding vulvar cancer is an independent factor of lymph node involvement, with local extension and LVSI.

Evidence-based wound classification for vulvar surgery: Implications for risk adjustment.

OBJECTIVES: The correct wound classification for vulvar procedures (VP) is ambiguous according to current definitions, and infection rates are poorly described. We aimed to analyze rates of surgical site infection (SSI) in women who underwent VP to correctly categorize wound classification. METHODS: Patients who underwent VP for dysplasia or carcinoma were collected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (NSQIP). SSI rates of vulvar cases were compared to patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomy via laparotomy, stratified by the National Academy of Sciences wound classification. Descriptive analyses and trend tests of categorical variables were performed. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2016, 2116 and 31,506 patients underwent a VP or TAH, respectively. Among VP, 1345 (63.6%), 364 (17.2%), and 407 (19.2%) women underwent simple vulvectomy, radical vulvectomy, or radical vulvectomy with lymphadenectomy, respectively. The overall rate of SSI for VP was higher than that observed for TAH (5.6% vs. 3.8%; p < 0.0001). While patients undergoing TAH displayed a corresponding increase in the rate of SSI with wound type (type I: 3.4%; type II: 3.8%, type III: 6.8%; type IV 10.6%; p < 0.001), no such correlation was observed for simple VP (type I: 3.3%, type II: 3.0%; type III: 3.2%; type IV: 0%; p = 0.40). On the other hand, a non-significant correlation was observed for radical VP (type I: 4.0%, type II: 10.1%; type III: 14.3%; type IV: 20.0%; p = 0.08). The overall rate of SSI in patients undergoing any radical VP was similar to patients undergoing hysterectomy with a type IV wound (10.1% vs 10.6%, p = 0.87). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing VP are at high risk of infection. Simple vulvectomy should be classified as a type II and radical vulvectomy as a type III wound. These recommendations are important for proper risk adjustment.

Carbon Dioxide with a New Pulse Profile and Shape: A Perfect Tool to Perform Labiaplasty for Functional and Cosmetic Purpose.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the benefits and safety of using Carbon Dioxide Laser in multi-pulse modalities when performing labiaplasty and anatomical variants approach for functional and cosmetic indications. DESIGN: This is a prospective, descriptive case series study. SETTING: Private Practice Quirofano Calculaser Megacentro Pinares Pereira Colombia. POPULATION: One Hundred and twelve women seeking labia minora labiaplasty for functional and cosmetic reasons were enrolled in the study protocol from June 2013 to June 2016. Labia minora labioplasty and anatomical variants approach were performed with Carbon Dioxide laser Multi-pulse modalities DEKA M.EL.A Florence Italy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Good Cosmetic results, functional and sexuality improvement. RESULTS: Dramatic changes in the VAS and VSQ were detected after the surgical procedure. All the participants reported a high degree of satisfaction, felt more confident with their partners during sexual encounters, and the procedure was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Laser Carbon Dioxide Laser with a new pulse profile and shape seems to be a safe and precise surgical tool to perform this type of procedures, optimal biophysical and bio stimulative laser-tissue interactions allow delicate vulvar tissues to shorten downtime.

Survey on Aesthetic Vulvovaginal Procedures: What do Portuguese Doctors and Medical Students Think? / Inquérito sobre procedimentos estéticos vulvovaginais: qual a opinião dos médicos e estudantes de medicina portugueses?

Abstract Objective To assess themedical doctors andmedical students' opinion regarding the evidence and ethical background of the performance of vulvovaginal aesthetic procedures (VVAPs). Methods Cross-sectional online survey among 664 Portuguese medical doctors and students. Results Most participants considered that there is never or there rarely is amedical reason to perform: vulvar whitening (85.9% [502/584]); hymenoplasty (72.0% [437/607]); mons pubis liposuction (71.6% [426/595]); "G-spot" augmentation (71.0% [409/576]); labia majora augmentation (66.3% [390/588]); labia minora augmentation (58.3% [326/559]); or laser vaginal tightening (52.3%[313/599]).Gynecologists and specialistsweremore likely to consider that there are no medical reasons to performVVAPs; the opposite was true for plastic surgeons and students/residents. Hymenoplasty raised ethical doubts in 51.1% (283/554) of the participants. Plastic surgeons and students/residents were less likely to raise ethical objections, while the opposite was true for gynecologists and specialists. Most considered that VVAPs could contribute to an improvement in self-esteem(92.3% [613/664]); sexual function (78.5% [521/664]); vaginal atrophy (69.9% [464/664]); quality of life (66.3% [440/664]); and sexual pain (61.4% [408/664]). Conclusions While medical doctors and students acknowledge the lack of evidence and scientific support for the performance of VVAPs, most do not raise ethical objections about them, especially if they are students or plastic surgeons, or if they have had or have considered having plastic surgery.

Resumo Objetivos Avaliar a opinião de médicos e estudantes de medicina relativamente à evidência e contexto ético para a realização de procedimentos estéticos vulvovaginais (PEVVs). Métodos Estudo transversal, consistindo de inquérito online a 664 médicos e estudantes de medicina portugueses. Resultados A maioria dos participantes considerou que nunca ou raramente há uma razão médica para a realização de: branqueamento vulvar (85,9% [502/584]); himenoplastia (72,0% [437/607]); lipoaspiração do mons pubis (71,6% [426/595]); aumento do "ponto G" (71,0% [409/576]); aumento dos grandes lábios (66,3% [390/588]); aumento dos pequenos lábios (58,3% [326/559]) ou aperto vaginal com laser (52,3% [313/599]). Ser ginecologista e especialista associou-se a maior probabilidade de considerar não haver razões médicas para a realização de PEVV; o oposto foi verdade para os cirurgiões plásticos e estudantes/internos. A himenoplastia levantou dúvidas em termos éticos em 51,1% (283/554) dos participantes. Cirurgiões plásticos e estudantes/internos relatarammenos dúvidas emtermos éticos; o oposto foi verdade para os ginecologistas ou especialistas. Amaioria considerou que os PEVVs podemcontribuir para uma melhoria na autoestima (92,3% [613/664]); função sexual (78,5% [521/664]); atrofia vaginal (69,9% [464/664]); qualidade de vida (66,3% [440/664]); e dor sexual (61,4% [408/664]). Conclusões Ainda que os médicos e estudantes de medicina reconheçam a falta de evidência e bases científicas para a realização de PEVVs, a maioria não levanta objecções em termos éticos, especialmente se forem estudantes, cirurgiões plásticos, ou se eles próprios tiverem sido submetidos a cirurgia plástica ou considerem vir a sê-lo.

A Qualitative Study on Experiences After Vulvar Surgery in Women With Lichen Sclerosus and Sexual Pain.

INTRODUCTION: Lichen sclerosus (LS) of the vulva can profoundly affect sexual interaction because of painful fissures and narrowing of the vaginal introitus. Successful surgical treatment is usually defined as restoration of (pain-free) penetrative sexual activity. AIMS: To evaluate the impact of surgery on (dyadic) sexual functioning and pleasure and psychological well-being. METHODS: Nineteen women with anogenital LS participated in audiotaped, qualitative, individual interviews after surgery to re-enable sexual intercourse. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical, sexual, and psychological experiences were analyzed using the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Vulvar surgery resulted in a decrease of sexual pain in 13 of 19 patients (68%). Of these 13 patients, 4 were completely free of pain and the other 9 patients expressed a shift from preoperative sexual pain to postoperative sexual discomfort. These women reported improved sexual functioning, increased sexual activity and intimacy with the partner, and reinstated feelings of being an adequate woman and sexual partner. In 1 of the 19 patients (5%), surgery did not result in decreased sexual pain, yet she continued to have intercourse. Five of the 19 patients (26%) stopped having intercourse because of pain; one woman had secondary vaginismus and another woman, in retrospect, had premorbid generalized unprovoked vulvodynia. Four of these women were unable to communicate with their partner about sexual matters and to change their sexual repertoire (satisfactorily) once they had ceased intercourse (attempts). Eighteen women (95%) reported a decrease of LS symptoms in daily life. CONCLUSION: Vulvar surgery seems an effective treatment for most women with LS who experience sexual pain owing to anatomic or epithelial changes and who wish to resume intercourse. To assess whether women might benefit from such surgery and/or whether (additional) sexual counseling is indicated, preoperative sexological couple-based consultation is needed. This consultation should exclude comorbid vaginismus and generalized unprovoked vulvodynia and index the couple's pre-existing sex life, including sexual communication skills, and the ability to incorporate non-coital pain-free sexual activities.

Motives for Vulvar Surgery of Women with Lichen Sclerosus.

INTRODUCTION: Women with lichen sclerosus (LS) may experience (superficial) dyspareunia or the inability to have vaginal intercourse due to painful fissures and narrowing of the vaginal introitus. A surgical procedure may contribute to the relief of these sexual pain problems. It is unknown what motives women have to undergo surgery in order to regain the ability to have sexual intercourse. Such knowledge can offer important insights that are indispensable when discussing the option of vulvar surgery with patients with LS and might prevent potential patient dissatisfaction. This study's purpose is to examine why women with LS decide to undergo vulvar surgery in order to restore intercourse. METHODS: Nineteen women with anogenital LS participated in audiotaped qualitative individual interviews, in which their motives for undergoing vulvar surgery to restore intercourse were explored retrospectively. Interview data were analyzed using the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Three main motives for wanting to undergo surgery in order to restore intercourse were found. These were the desire to be a "normal" woman, the desire to sexually satisfy the male partner, and the desire to regain the experience of intimacy and sexual enjoyment. Another reason for surgery was to reduce daily life LS symptoms. The sexual pain complaints prevented the women from living up to their norms about heterosexuality and gender roles. Being unable to have intercourse led women to feel inadequate as a woman and as a sexual partner. CONCLUSIONS: Women with LS may opt for surgery to restore their identity as a "normal" woman and sexual partner, to regain the experience of coital intimacy, and to be less bothered by LS symptoms in daily life. The present findings point to the importance of a thorough couple-based sexual history in which women's motives for and expectations of vulvar surgery will be explored in order to facilitate a good decision and to increase treatment satisfaction.

[Pudendal nerve block for perineo-vulvar surgery: monocentered prospective and randomised study]. / Bloc du nerf pudendal en chirurgie périnéo-vulvaire : étude monocentrique prospective randomisée.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of pudendal nerve block on the quality of analgesia in perineal or vulvar surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We realised a monocentered, prospective and randomised study of all patients undergoing perineo-vulvar surgery. Two groups of patients were evaluated: general anaesthesia alone (GA group, 41 patients) and both general anaesthesia and bilateral nerve stimulator-guided pudendal nerve block (15 mL of Ropivacaïne 5 mg.mL(-1)+0,5 µg.kg(-1) of Clonidine) (PB group, 42 patients). Evaluation of pain was realised with per- and post-surgical prescription of hypnotics and antalgics was noted. The primary outcome measure was the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) pain means scores in the first postoperative 24 hours. RESULTS: There was no difference in the VAS pain means scores in the first 24 hours, but it seemed to have a decrease in VAS pain at 2 hours in the PB group. Analgesic consumption during surgery was decreased in the same group. No complication of the pudendal block has been reported. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The nerve stimulator-guided pudendal nerve block is a simple and useful method which can, when associated with general anesthesia, reduce per-operative antalgics consumption and a decrease in the immediate postoperative pain in perineal or vulvar surgery, without complication or lengthening operating time. Further studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of this technique and evaluate the costs and potential complications.

Vulvar reconstruction using the "lotus petal" fascio-cutaneous flap.

INTRODUCTION: Vulvar reconstruction using the "lotus petal" fascio-cutaneous flap offers a relatively novel means to restore symmetry and functionality after extirpative gynecologic or oncologic procedures. We sought to assess the success rates and morbidity in a large series of consecutively treated patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 59 consecutive cases of lotus petal flaps performed at a single institution to more accurately assess success and complication rates. RESULTS: We identified 80 flaps performed among the 59 patients between September 1, 2008 and March 30, 2013. The median (range) age was 59 years (24-89) and the median (range) BMI was 27 kg/m(2) (19-34). The indications for vulvar/perineal excision were as follows: 39 (66.1%) vulvar carcinoma or melanoma, 12 (20.3%) vulvar dysplasia, 5 (8.5%) colorectal disease and 3 (5.1%) cases of hidradenitis suppurativa. The mean defect area, determined by post-fixation pathology specimen was 29 cm(2). Medical or surgical complications occurred in 36% of patients of which superficial wound separation was the most common (15%). There were no cases of complete flap loss, but partial loss occurred in 7 (8.8%) cases. 3 (5.1%) patients required re-operation prior to discharge with one case requiring skin grafting. Delayed surgical revision was required in 4 patients for partial flap loss (2) or stricture/stenosis (2). CONCLUSION: The lotus petal flap is safe for use in gynecologic reconstruction, with acceptable short- and long-term complication rates. Previous reports of smaller series likely underestimate the risk of complications through case selection.