RESUMO
Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) have been widely used for drainage of peripancreatic collections. A 71-year-old woman with a history of necrotizing pancreatitis who underwent LAMS placement 3 months ago for symptomatic pancreatic fluid collection presented with hematochezia and hemodynamic instability. Computed tomographic angiography of the abdomen showed concerns for stent erosion into the splenic artery. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a large pulsating nonbleeding vessel within the LAMS. She underwent a mesenteric angiogram, which showed splenic artery pseudoaneurysm, and coil embolization was performed. Gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to pseudoaneurysm should be considered in patients with recent LAMS placement who present with signs of gastrointestinal bleeding.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: A recent expert panel issued recommendations about the technical aspects of direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) for pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). However, significant technical heterogeneity still exists among endoscopists. AIM: To report the outcomes of our DEN technique and how it differs from a recent expert consensus statement and previous studies. METHODS: Medical records of patients with WON who underwent DEN from September 2016 - May 2019 were queried for the following information: Age, gender, ethnicity, etiology of acute pancreatitis, WON location and size, DEN technical information, adverse events (AEs) and outcomes. Adverse events were graded according to the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Lexicon grading system. Technical success was defined as adequate lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS) deployment plus removal of ≥ 90% of necrosum. Clinical success was defined as complete resolution of WON cavity by imaging and resolution of symptoms at ≤ 3 months (mo) after last DEN. Data analysis was performed using mean and standard deviation for continuous variables, frequency and proportion for categorical variables, and median and range for interval data. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients underwent DEN. Most of them were Hispanic and their mean age was 51 ± 17 years. The majority of the collections were located in the body of the pancreas and the mean size was 13 cm ± 5 cm. The most common indication was persistent vomiting. Antibiotics were administered only in cases of infected necrosis. All LAMS were placed without radiological guidance, dilated the same day of deployment and removed after a mean of 27 ± 11 d. Routine cross-sectional imaging immediately after drainage was not performed. The mean interval between DEN sessions was 7 ± 4 d and the mean number of DEN/patient was 3 ± 2. Technical and clinical success rates were both 95%. AEs were seen in 5 patients and included: Sepsis (2), stent migration (1), stent maldeployment (1), perforation (1). The sensitivity and positive predictive value of an occluded LAMS leading to sepsis was 50% and 0.11 respectively. No fatalities were observed. CONCLUSION: Our DEN technique differed significantly from the one recommended by a recent expert panel and the one published in previous studies. Despite these differences excellent clinical outcomes were obtained.
RESUMO
Background: Pancreatic fluid collections (PFC) are associated with severe acute pancreatitis. After maturation (after 4 weeks) they are classified as pancreatic pseudocyst (PP) and walled-off necrosis (WON). Endoscopic management is associated with lower morbidity and mortality compared with surgery. Aim: To describe the experience of EUS-guided drainage PFC drainage using plastic stent (PS) or metal stent (lumen apposing metal stents, or "LAMS"). Methods: Retrospective, observational study, between 2016-2019. Results: 17 patients in total. 8 cases were symptomatic PP and 9 were WON. Age 12-72 years. 12 cases in men. Indications: abdominal pain 5 cases and infection 11. The 8 cases of PFC were drained successfully using PS, without adverse effects. Regarding WON drainage, 3 cases were managed with PS and 6 with LAMS. In 5 cases, complementary endoscopic necrosectomy was required. A patient with LAMS required complementary surgical cleaning ("step-up") to treat collections far from the LAMS. Complications: one case of PS presented pigment occlusion with superinfection and another case presented migration to the stomach. Regarding LAMS, one case presented self-limited bleeding, another case presented obstruction of the stent with infection, which was managed endoscopically and with antibiotics. Conclusion: The endoscopic management of PFC is effective and safe, with plastic and metal stent (LAMS). The choice of type of stent depends on the characteristics of PFC (liquid vs solid), center experience and costs.
Introducción: Las colecciones pancreáticas (CP) se asocian a pancreatitis agudas graves. Luego de su maduración (después de las 4 semanas) se clasifican en pseudoquistes (PQ) y necrosis encapsulada (NE). El manejo endoscópico se asocia a menor morbimortalidad comparado con el quirúrgico. Objetivo: Describir la experiencia del drenaje de CP mediante el uso de prótesis plásticas (PP) o metálicas (lumen apposing metal stents, o "LAMS") mediante endosonografía. Método: Estudio retrospectivo, observacional, entre 2016-2018. Resultados: 17 pacientes en total. Ocho casos fueron PQ sintomáticos y 9 NE. Edad 12-72 años (12 casos en hombres). Indicaciones: dolor abdominal 5 casos e infección 11. Los 8 casos de PQ fueron drenados exitosamente con PP, sin efectos adversos. En relación con el drenaje de NE, 3 casos fueron manejados con PP y 6 con LAMS. En 5 casos se requirió necrosectomía endoscópica complementaria. Un paciente con LAMS requirió aseo quirúrgico complementario por colecciones alejadas al LAMS. En relación con las complicaciones, un caso de PP presentó oclusión del pigtail con sobreinfección y otro presentó migración al estómago. Respecto a LAMS, un caso presentó sangrado autolimitado y otro caso obstrucción de la prótesis con sobreinfección, que fue manejada endoscópicamente y con antibióticos. Conclusión: El manejo endoscópico de las CP es efectiva y segura, tanto con prótesis plásticas como metálicas (LAMS). La elección de la prótesis depende de las características de la lesión (líquido vs sólido), experiencia del centro y costos.