Prior treatment with oxaliplatin-containing regimens and higher total bilirubin levels are risk factors for neutropenia and febrile neutropenia in patients with gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer receiving weekly paclitaxel and ramucirumab therapy: a single center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Weekly paclitaxel + ramucirumab (wPTX + RAM) therapy is recommended as the standard second-line chemotherapy regimen for unresectable advanced/recurrent gastric cancer (GC) or esophagogastric junction cancer. Recent subgroup analysis of the RAINBOW trial revealed a higher frequency of severe neutropenia due to wPTX + RAM in Japanese compared to Western patients. However, no risk factors for severe neutropenia have been identified. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients with advanced/unresectable gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer who received wPTX + RAM after failure to respond to platinum and fluoropyrimidine doublet chemotherapy between June 2015 and April 2020. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify the risk factors associated with grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN). In addition, we investigated the relationship between the number of risk factors and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Among 66 patients who met the inclusion criteria, grade 4 neutropenia and FN occurred in 21 (31.8%) and 12 (18.2%) patients, respectively. Prior treatment with oxaliplatin-containing regimens was identified as an independent risk factor for developing grade 4 neutropenia (odds ratio (OR) 20.034, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.216-124.807, P = 0.001). Total bilirubin of > 1.5 mg/dL (OR 31.316, 95% CI 2.052-477.843, P = 0.013) and prior treatment with oxaliplatin-containing regimen (OR 12.502, 95% CI 1.141-137.022, P = 0.039) were identified as independent risk factors for developing FN. Next, we classified patients with 0, 1, 2 risk factor(s) as RF-0, RF-1, and RF-2 subgroups, respectively, and compared the PFS and OS among the three subgroups. PFS was not significantly different among the three subgroups, whereas OS was significantly shorter in the RF-2 subgroup (median 1.4 month, 95% CI 0.0-5.3 month) than in the RF-0 subgroup (median 10.2 month, 95% CI 6.8-13.5 month, P < 0.01 vs RF-2) and RF-1 subgroup (median 13.3 month, 95% CI 10.9-15.7 month, P < 0.01 vs RF-2). CONCLUSIONS: Careful monitoring for grade 4 neutropenia and FN is needed for patients receiving wPTX + RAM therapy who have a history of treatment with oxaliplatin-containing regimens and higher total bilirubin levels.

DICE: Dual mTorc Inhibition in advanCed/recurrent Epithelial ovarian cancer resistant to standard treatment-a study protocol for a randomised trial investigating a novel therapy called TAK228.

BACKGROUND: The standard initial treatment for ovarian cancer is surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy and potentially maintenance therapy with avastin or inhibitors of poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP). While a proportion of women are cured by this approach, the vast majority will relapse and become resistant to platinum chemotherapy either initially or on subsequent treatment. There is an unmet need to improve response to treatment and quality of life in these women. TAK228 is a novel therapy that can be added to standard treatment in the participant population and the aim of the DICE trial is to assess its effectiveness. Laboratory and clinical research has shown that these ovarian cancers may respond to the molecular target of a drug such as TAK228, and there have been studies using it in other advanced solid tumours including endometrial cancer. METHODS: One hundred twenty-four eligible women will be recruited from participating research sites in the United Kingdom (UK) and Germany. Randomised participants will receive either weekly paclitaxel alone (standard treatment, n = 62) or TAK228 plus weekly paclitaxel (n = 62) until the cancer significantly worsens; there are significant adverse events or any other protocol-defined stopping criteria. Participants will be monitored for response to treatment (using radiological imaging), adverse events and quality of life during both randomised treatment and subsequent follow-up. DISCUSSION: The primary objective/endpoint of the study is to compare the two treatments in terms of progression-free survival, or the length of time that each participant is alive without the cancer significantly worsening according to defined assessment criteria. If the addition of TAK228 to weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy is shown to significantly improve this statistically, and adverse events and quality of life are not significantly worse than standard treatment, then TAK228 plus weekly paclitaxel could potentially be taken forward within the context of a larger phase III trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03648489 . Registered on 27 August 2018.

Response to and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer and poor general condition.

It has remained elusive whether standard chemotherapy regimens are safe for patients with ovarian cancer and poor general condition. The purpose of the present study was to assess the response to and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin (W-PC) in patients with ovarian cancer and poor general condition. The subjects were patients with ovarian cancer who received W-PC at Jichi Medical University Hospital (Shimotsuke, Japan) between January 2008 and December 2016. Patients who were ≥80 years old and/or had a performance status ≥3 and/or severe complications/underlying diseases were selected. Patients received paclitaxel (60 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the curve 2 mg/ml/min) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 31 patients were included in the study. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia developed in 18 (58%), 5 (16%) and 1 (3%) patients, respectively. Furthermore, three (10%) patients had a complete response (CR), 12 (39%) had a partial response (PR), 5 (16%) had stable disease and 11 (35%) had progressive disease. The overall response rate was 48% (15/31) and the disease control rate was 65% (20/31). The 5-year progression-free survival was 15% and the 5-year overall survival was 15%. A total of 9 patients survived for >40 months, one of whom survived without recurrence for 122 months. Performance status <3, a tumor response of CR or PR and >5 chemotherapy cycles were indicators of favorable prognosis. Only >5 chemotherapy cycles (vs. ≤5; P=0.002) was an independent good prognostic factor according to multivariate analysis. In conclusion, W-PC was tolerable and slightly effective in patients with ovarian cancer and poor general condition. W-PC may be one option for patients who are unable to receive standard chemotherapy regimens.

Chemoradiation with Weekly Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Study.

Objective Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) using paclitaxel and carboplatin has significantly improved the survival rates in carcinoma esophagus, especially in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). This regimen has not been adequately explored prospectively as a definitive CRT strategy. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy, toxicity, and compliance to this regimen in a prospective setting in locally advanced esophageal SCC. Materials and Methods Patients with locally advanced esophageal SCC were planned for definitive CRT by using weekly paclitaxel 50 mg/m 2 and carboplatin area under curve 2 along with radical radiotherapy to a dose of 50.4 to 54 Gy. Treatment-related toxicity was assessed by using the common terminology criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0, and the response was assessed by using endoscopy and computed tomography (CT) 4 to 6 weeks following CRT. The pathological response was documented for those who underwent surgery. Results Fifteen patients were included in the study, and all patients completed the planned course of radiation. The median number of chemotherapy cycles received was four. In total, 66% of the patients had delay or interruptions in chemotherapy, mostly due to neutropenia, and 66% of the patients had a clinical complete response (CR). Four patients underwent definitive esophagectomy, and the histopathology revealed pathologic CR. Overall CR rate was 80%. The median overall survival was 14 months, and 1-year survival was 57%. Conclusion Definitive CRT in esophageal SCC using weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin was relatively well tolerated with manageable toxicities and good clinical response rates. It may potentially represent a new standard of care as definitive therapy in the management of these tumors.

Phase I evaluation of lenvatinib and weekly paclitaxel in patients with recurrent endometrial, ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and describe toxicities associated with lenvatinib and weekly paclitaxel in patients with recurrent endometrial and platinum resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Using a 3 + 3 design patients were given weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV day 1, 8, 15 and oral levantinib daily on a 28-day cycle. Lenvatinib dose levels were 8 mg, 12 mg, 16 mg, 20 mg. Toxicities were recorded using CTCAE v4.03 and response was determined with imaging after cycle 2, then every 3rd cycle, using RECIST 1.1 criteria. RESULTS: 26 patients were enrolled; 19 with ovarian cancer (14 high grade serous, 1 low grade serous, 2 clear cell, 1 endometrioid, and 1 carcinosarcoma), and 7 with endometrial cancer (3 serous, and 4 endometrioid). The MTD was established at lenvatinib 16 mg and weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2. Toxicities (all grades) occurring in ≥25% of patients included anemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, mucositis, nausea, diarrhea, anorexia, hypertension, fatigue, proteinuria, epistaxis, hoarseness. Twenty-three patients were evaluable for response and PFS; 15 (65%) had a partial response, 7 (30%) stable, 1 (4%) progressive disease with an objective response rate of 65%; 71% in ovarian and 50% in endometrial cancer. Median progression free survival (PFS) is 12.4 months; 14.0 months in endometrial cancer, 7.2 months in ovarian cancer; 54% had a PFS > 6 months. The median duration of response for PR patients (n = 15) was 10.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: The regimen was tolerable with manageable side effects. Encouraging activity was observed in endometrial and ovarian cancer, and warrants further development.

Comparison of dose-dense vs. 3-weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in the first-line treatment of ovarian cancer in a propensity score-matched cohort.

BACKGROUND: Benefit of carboplatin and dose-dense weekly paclitaxel (ddCT) in first line treatment of ovarian cancer patients has been different in Western and Asian studies. In the present study we compare progression-free survival (PFS) of ddCT to three-weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel (CT) in first-line treatment of ovarian carcinoma in a single institution in a Western population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records from patients with ovarian carcinoma treated in a tertiary cancer center from 2007 to 2018. All patients treated with ddCT or CT in the first-line setting were included. Patients who received first-line bevacizumab were not included. PFS and overall survival (OS) were compared in a propensity score-matched cohort to address selection bias. Patients were matched according to age, ECOG performance status, CA 125, FIGO stage, residual disease, and histological subtype, in a 1:2 ratio. RESULTS: Five hundred eighty-eight patients were eligible for propensity score matching, the final cohort consisted of 69 patients treated with ddCT and 138 CT group. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced. After a median follow-up of 65.1 months, median PFS was 29.3 vs 20.0 months, favouring ddCT treatment (p = 0.035). In the multivariate cox regression ddCT showed a 18% lower risk of progression (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99, p = 0.04). Overall survival data is immature, but suggested better outcomes for ddCT (not reached versus 78.8 months; p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Our retrospective study has shown superior PFS of ddCT over CT regimen in first-line treatment of ovarian carcinoma in a Western population not treated with bevacizumab.

Biomarkers of outcome to weekly paclitaxel in epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the role of intrinsic chromosomal aberrations in determining favorable outcome to weekly paclitaxel (WP) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: We evaluated the common genomic aberrations of two patients with EOC and exceptional WP response in the GENIUS study (NCT03740503). We then searched for potential markers of unusual outcomes to WP in a validation cohort. We performed shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS) in the tumor tissue of women with EOC considered as short-responders (SR; progression with ≤3 cycles) and long-responders (LR; response at ≥8 cycles) to WP monotherapy. RESULTS: We identified two women with exceptional response to WP, lasting over four years, who shared chromosome 8 gain as a common genomic aberration. In order to validate our findings, we reviewed 188 patients with EOC treated with WP and selected 61 women (39 SR, 22 LR) with unusual responses. By sWGS, there was no differential alterations in the copy number changes in chromosome 8, or in genes related to angiogenesis, tubulin superfamily, cell-cycle, apoptosis and paclitaxel metabolism or transportation pathways. Amongst the LR group, we identified six exceptionally long responders (ExLR), with responses lasting over a year. In an exploratory analysis, there was increased amplification of angiogenesis (VEGFB, MMP9), tubulin superfamily (TSC2) and apoptosis related genes (BCL2L1, BAD) in ExLR compared to SR. We identified one patient with a complete response to WP for over 7 years. Molecular profiling identified unique amplifications in interleukin related genes (CXCR1, CXCR2, IL1A, IL1B), not detected in other patients. CONCLUSION: Intrinsic tumor pathways may impact outcome with weekly paclitaxel monotherapy and further investigations are required.

Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Paclitaxel in Breast Cancer With Symptomatic Bone Marrow Infiltration.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Currently, there is no recommendation for the treatment of breast cancer (BC) with bone-marrow cell infiltration (BMI). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of weekly-paclitaxel in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included all BC patients with BMI receiving weekly-paclitaxel between January 2014 and May 2018. Overall-survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were progression-free-survival (PFS) and safety. RESULTS: BMI was diagnosed in 26 patients. This infiltration was suggested by peripheral blood smear in 73% of cases. All patients had anemia, and 77% had thrombocytopenia. OS and PFS were 7.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI)=2.6-20.7] and 3.3 months (95%CI=1.6-7.2), respectively. Good performance-status, absence of thrombocytopenia and presence of less than 5% of circulating erythroblasts at BMI diagnosis, were associated with better survival. One patient presented grade 5 febrile neutropenia but no episodes of bleeding were reported. CONCLUSION: Weekly-paclitaxel is an effective therapeutic option with limited toxicity for BC with BMI.

Comparing Paclitaxel-Carboplatin with Paclitaxel-Cisplatin as the Front-Line Chemotherapy for Patients with FIGO IIIC Serous-Type Tubo-Ovarian Cancer.

The use of weekly chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced-stage serous-type epithelial Tubo-ovarian cancer (ETOC), and primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) is acceptable as the front-line postoperative chemotherapy after primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS). The main component of dose-dense chemotherapy is weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2), but it would be interesting to know what is the difference between combination of triweekly cisplatin (20 mg/m2) or triweekly carboplatin (carboplatin area under the curve 5-7 mg/mL per min [AUC 5-7]) in the dose-dense paclitaxel regimen. Therefore, we compared the outcomes of women with Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC ETOC and PPSC treated with PCS and a subsequent combination of dose-dense weekly paclitaxel and triweekly cisplatin (paclitaxel-cisplatin) or triweekly carboplatin using AUC 5 (paclitaxel-carboplatin). Between January 2010 and December 2016, 40 women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC EOC, FTC, or PPSC were enrolled, including 18 treated with paclitaxel-cisplatin and the remaining 22 treated with paclitaxel-carboplatin. There were no statistically significant differences in disease characteristics of patients between two groups. Outcomes in paclitaxel-cisplatin group seemed to be little better than those in paclitaxel-carboplatin (median progression-free survival [PFS] 30 versus 25 months as well as median overall survival [OS] 58.5 versus 55.0 months); however, neither reached a statistically significant difference. In terms of adverse events (AEs), patients in paclitaxel-carboplatin group had more AEs, with a higher risk of neutropenia and grade 3/4 neutropenia, and the need for a longer period to complete the front-line chemotherapy, and the latter was associated with worse outcome for patients. We found that a period between the first-time chemotherapy to the last dose (6 cycles) of chemotherapy >21 weeks was associated with a worse prognosis in patients compared to that ≤21 weeks, with hazard ratio (HR) of 81.24 for PFS and 9.57 for OS. As predicted, suboptimal debulking surgery (>1 cm) also contributed to a worse outcome than optimal debulking surgery (≤1 cm) with HR of 14.38 for PFS and 11.83 for OS. Based on the aforementioned findings, both regimens were feasible and effective, but maximal efforts should be made to achieve optimal debulking surgery and following the on-schedule administration of dose-dense weekly paclitaxel plus triweekly platinum compounds. Randomized trials validating the findings are warranted.

Pathologic Response After Weekly Paclitaxel versus Docetaxel in Operable Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Weekly paclitaxel (Ptx) and q3w docetaxel (Dtx) are equivalent in adjuvant breast cancer treatment. Weekly Ptx is better tolerated than q3w Dtx and became the first choice in daily practice, even preoperatively. METHODS: To compare the efficacy and safety of the two regimens, a retrospective analysis was performed in breast cancer patients (pts) referred for neoadjuvant, sequential, taxane-containing chemotherapy to the Institute of Oncology and Oncofort Clinic, Bucharest, between 2008 and 2017. RESULTS: Forty-seven cases were eligible, median age was 56 years (34-73 years), mainly stage IIIA-B (53.2%, 25 pts) and ductal invasive (70.2%, 33 pts) of which 24 pts (51%) received q3w Dtx and 23 pts (48.9%) weekly Ptx. The histological response rates were 62.5% (15 pts) and 73.7% (17 pts) (p=0.47), average dose-intensity was 87.7% and 96.7% (p=0.002) and grade III-IV toxicity rate was 12.5% and 13% (p=0.64), respectively. Pathologic response was correlated with immunophenotype, PgR expression, tumor size and backbone chemotherapy (p<0.05). DISCUSSION: Our study showed an improved efficacy of taxane's weekly administration, probably due to a better tolerance and a lower rate of dose-impairing toxicities.

Dose-dense chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and 3-weekly carboplatin for recurrent ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the response to dose-dense chemotherapy of weekly paclitaxel and 3-weekly carboplatin in recurrent ovarian cancer, and to report results of literature review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients accepted weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on day 1, 8, 15 and carboplatin on day1 at area under curve (AUC) 6 every 21 days were reviewed for the response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity during January 2012 to April 2016 in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taiwan. RESULTS: Sixteen patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, including 1 platinum-resistant, 7 partially platinum-sensitive, and 8 platinum-sensitive, accepted a median of 6 cycles of chemotherapy (range 3-10). The overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate were 93.8%, and 62.5%, respectively. The median PFS of all patients were 10.9 months (range 4.3-40.5). The median time to response (TTR) was 29.0 days (range 19.6-38.4). The median disease-free survival (DFS) after CR was 5.6 months (range 1.2-34.2). Grade 3 at least toxicity included anemia (6.3%), neutropenia (50%), and thrombocytopenia (18.8%). Twenty-nine articles on phase I, II, III, or retrospective studies of dose-dense chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel were reviewed. CONCLUSION: This is the first report using Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group 3016 protocol, weekly paclitaxel and 3-weely carboplatin, on recurrent ovarian cancer. The current study showed high ORR and CR with tolerable toxicities. Our study suggested dose-dense chemotherapy with paclitaxel, especially combining carboplatin created high efficacy probably by anti-angiogenesis. However, consolidation or maintenance therapy is needed to prolong DFS.

Cryotherapy for the prevention of weekly paclitaxel-induced peripheral adverse events in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase II study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of cryotherapy in preventing peripheral neuropathy and dermatological adverse events in breast cancer patients treated with weekly paclitaxel. METHODS: Patients treated with 12 weekly doses of paclitaxel for breast cancer were randomized (1:1) into a cryotherapy or control group. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with a marked decrease in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Neurotoxicity (FACT-NTX) score. The secondary endpoints were Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ), Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) for peripheral neuropathy, and FACT-Taxane score. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were randomly assigned to the cryotherapy (n = 22) or control groups (n = 22). The percentage of patients with a marked decrease in FACT-NTX scores was significantly lower in the cryotherapy group than in the control group (41 vs. 73%, p = 0.03). The incidence of CTCAE grade ≥ 2 sensory (p = 0.001) and motor peripheral neuropathy (p = 0.01), and PNQ grade D or higher for sensory peripheral neuropathy (p = 0.02), and decrease in the FACT-Taxane score (p = 0.02) were also significantly lower in the cryotherapy group than in the control group. There were no serious side effects associated with cryotherapy. CONCLUSION: Cryotherapy is an effective approach for prevention of peripheral neuropathy and dermatological adverse events in breast cancer patients treated with weekly paclitaxel.

Weekly Dose-Dense Paclitaxel and Triweekly Low-Dose Cisplatin: A Well-Tolerated and Effective Chemotherapeutic Regimen for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Primary Peritoneal Cancer.

A combination of cytoreductive surgery, either primary (PCS) or interval (ICS), and chemotherapy with a platinum-paclitaxel regimen is the well-accepted treatment for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), fallopian tube cancer (FTC), and primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC), but it is still uncertain whether a combination of dose-dense weekly paclitaxel and low-dose triweekly cisplatin is useful in the management of these patients. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of women with advanced-stage EOC, FTC, and PPSC treated with PCS and subsequent dose-dense weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) and low-dose triweekly cisplatin (20 mg/m2). Between January 2011 and December 2017, 32 women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC-IV EOC, FTC, or PPSC were enrolled. Optimal PCS was achieved in 63.5% of patients. The mean and median progression-free survival was 36.5 and 27.0 months, respectively (95% confidence interval (CI): 26.8-46.2 and 11.3-42.7 months, respectively). The mean overall survival was 56.0 months (95% CI: 43.9-68.1 months), and the median overall survival could not be obtained. The most common all-grade adverse events (AEs) were anemia (96.9%), neutropenia (50%), peripheral neuropathy (28.1%), nausea and vomiting (34.4%), and thrombocytopenia (15.6%). These AEs were predominantly grade 1/2, and only a few patients were complicated by grade 3/4 neutropenia (21.9%) and anemia (6.3%). A multivariate analysis indicated that only suboptimal PCS was significantly correlated with a worse prognosis, resulting in an 11.6-fold increase in the odds of disease progression. In conclusion, our data suggest that dose-dense weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) combined with low-dose triweekly cisplatin (20 mg/m2) is a potentially effective and highly tolerable front-line treatment in advanced EOC, FTC, and PPSC. Randomized trials comparing the outcome of this regimen to other standard therapies for FIGO stage IIIC-IV EOC, FTC, and PPSC are warranted.

Randomized phase II study evaluating weekly oral vinorelbine versus weekly paclitaxel in estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative patients with advanced breast cancer (NorBreast-231 trial).

BACKGROUND: Single-agent paclitaxel and vinorelbine are recommended treatments for advanced breast cancer (ABC) non-responsive to hormone therapy and without visceral crisis. This phase II trial compared first-line oral vinorelbine versus weekly paclitaxel for ABC. METHODS: Eligible female patients had measurable locally recurrent/metastatic estrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer and had received prior endocrine therapy (any setting) but no chemotherapy for ABC. Patients were stratified by prior taxane and visceral metastases and randomized to either oral vinorelbine 80 mg/m2 (first cycle at 60 mg/m2, escalated to 80 mg/m2 in the absence of grade 3/4 toxicity) or intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR; confirmed complete or partial response, or stable disease for ≥6 weeks). RESULTS: The 131 randomized patients had received a median of 2 prior endocrine therapies; >70% had prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and 79% visceral metastases. DCR was 75.8% (95% confidence interval: 63.6-85.5%) with vinorelbine and 75.4% (63.1-85.2%) with paclitaxel. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (52%), fatigue (11%), and vomiting (5%) with vinorelbine, and neutropenia (17%), dyspnea (6%), hypertension (6%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (5%) with paclitaxel. Grade 2 alopecia occurred in 2% of vinorelbine-treated and 34% of paclitaxel-treated patients. Neither arm showed relevant global health status changes. CONCLUSION: Oral vinorelbine and paclitaxel demonstrated similar DCRs (∼75%). Safety profiles differed and, together with administration route and convenience, may influence treatment choice (EudraCT number, 2012-003530-16).

Prognostic and predictive factors for angiosarcoma patients receiving paclitaxel once weekly plus or minus bevacizumab: an ancillary study derived from a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: We report here a correlation analysis conducted along with a phase II trial assessing bevacizumab in combination with weekly paclitaxel. METHODS: Circulating pro/anti-angiogenic factors were assessed on day 1 (D1) and day 8 (D8). The prognostic value for progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated using a Cox model with biomarkers as continuous variables. RESULTS: Among the 51 patients enrolled and treated in this trial, biomarker analysis was performed for 42: 18 in Arm A (single-agent) and 24 in Arm B (combination). With a median follow-up of 46 months, PFS was 5.5 versus 5.7 months, respectively (p = 0.75). According to univariate analysis, factors associated with a poor PFS were as follows: visceral angiosarcoma, de novo angiosarcoma, and high PlGF and low VEGF-C baseline values. In multivariate analysis, de novo angiosarcoma (HR = 2.5; p = 0.024) and baseline VEGF-C value (HR = 0.7; p = 0.003) were significant prognostic factors. We observed a significant increase in circulating PlGF (< 0.001) and a decrease in VEGF (< 0.001) during bevacizumab treatment. An increase in FGF was associated with a poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: De novo angiosarcoma and a low baseline level of VEGF-C were found to be associated with a poor prognosis. Addition of bevacizumab induces major changes in circulating biomarkers (VEGF and PlGF) in a short timeframe without impacting PFS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered on EudraCT N° 2009-017020-59 and NCT01303497 (February 24, 2011).

Once weekly paclitaxel associated with a fixed dose of oral metronomic cyclophosphamide: a dose-finding phase 1 trial.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this trial was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of weekly paclitaxel (wP) administered in combination with oral metronomic cyclophosphamide (OMC). METHODS: Patients ≥ 18 years of age with refractory metastatic cancers were eligible if no standard curative measures existed. Paclitaxel was administered IV weekly (D1, D8, D15; D1 = D28) in combination with a fixed dose of OMC (50 mg twice a day). A 3 + 3 design was used for dose escalation of wP (40 to 75 mg/m2) followed by an expansion cohort at RP2D. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined over the first 28-day cycle as grade ≥ 3 non-hematological or grade 4 hematological toxicity (NCI-CTCAE v4.0) or any toxicity leading to a dose reduction. RESULTS: In total, 28 pts. (18 in dose-escalation phase and 10 in expansion cohort) were included, and 16/18 pts. enrolled in the dose-escalation phase were evaluable for DLT. DLT occurred in 0/3, 1/6 (neuropathy), 0/3 and 2/4 pts. (hematological toxicity) at doses of 40, 60, 70 and 75 mg/m2 of wP, respectively. The RP2D of wP was 70 mg/m2; 1/10 patients in the expansion phase had a hematological DLT. At RP2D (n = 14), the maximal grade of drug-related adverse event was Gr1 in three patients, Gr2 in six patients, Gr3 in one patient and Gr4 in one patient (no AE in three patients). At RP2D, a partial response was observed in one patient with lung adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: The combination of OMC and wP resulted in an acceptable safety profile, warranting further clinical evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TRN: NCT01374620 ; date of registration: 16 June 2011.

A case report of locally advanced triple negative breast cancer showing pathological complete response to weekly paclitaxel with bevacizumab treatment following disease progression during anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard of care for locally advanced triple negative breast cancer, however, approximately 5% of cases show disease progression during NAC. Although downstaging is essential to create an opportunity for curative surgery and to improve the local control outcome in such a case, no additional line of chemotherapy has been established. CASE PRESENTATION: A 60-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for an axillary mass presenting three weeks ago and was diagnosed as having right locally advanced (T2N2M0, stage IIIA) triple negative breast cancer. After two courses of epirubicine and cyclophosphamide as NAC, disease progression was recognized and curative resection was considered impossible due to enlarged axillary lymph nodes showing invasion to surrounding tissue. As second-line chemotherapy, weekly paclitaxel with bevacizumab treatment was initiated and significant shrinkage was immediately obtained. A clinically complete response was diagnosed after four courses of weekly paclitaxel with bevacizumab and she underwent a right breast mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection without major complications. Histopathological examination of surgical specimens showed no residual invasive or noninvasive disease and she was diagnosed as having a pathological complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Although the addition of bevacizumab to standard adjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended in unselected triple negative breast cancer, the potent effect on tumor shrinkage should be considered in the treatment of locally advanced triple negative breast cancer showing disease progression during standard NAC.

A tertiary care experience with paclitaxel and cetuximab as palliative chemotherapy in platinum sensitive and nonsensitive in head and neck cancers.

BACKGROUND: The combination of paclitaxel and cetuximab (PaCe) has led to an encouraging response rate in Phase 2 setting with limited toxicity. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of this regimen in our setting in platinum sensitive and nonsensitive patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of head and neck cancer patients treated with weekly PaCe as palliative chemotherapy between May 2010 and August 2014. The standard schedule of cetuximab along with 80 mg/m2 of weekly paclitaxel was administered till either disease progression or withdrawal of patient's consent. The toxicity and response were noted in accordance with CTCAE version 4.02 and RECIST version 1.1 criteria, respectively. The response rates between platinum sensitive and nonsensitive patients were compared by Chi-square test. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier survival method and log-rank test was used for comparison. Cox proportional hazard model was used for identification of factors affecting PFS and OS. RESULTS: One Hundred patients with a median age of 52 years (interquartile range: 46-56 years) were included. Forty-five patients (45%) were platinum insensitive, whereas 55 patients (55%) were platinum sensitive. In platinum insensitive patients and sensitive patients, the response rates were 38.5% and 22.2%, respectively (P = 0.104), whereas the symptomatic benefit in pain was seen in 89.5% and 71.7%, respectively (P = 0.044). The median PFS in platinum insensitive and sensitive patients were 150 and 152 days, respectively (P = 0.932), whereas the median OS was 256 days (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 168.2-343.8 days) and 314 days (95% CI: 227.6-400.4 days), respectively (P = 0.23). Nineteen patients (19%) had grades 3-4 adverse events during chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Weekly paclitaxel combined with cetuximab has promising efficacy and good tolerability in the palliative setting in advanced head and neck cancer in both platinum sensitive and insensitive patients.

Critically short telomeres and toxicity of chemotherapy in early breast cancer.

Cumulative toxicity from weekly paclitaxel (myalgia, peripheral neuropathy, fatigue) compromises long-term administration. Preclinical data suggest that the burden of critically short telomeres (< 3 kilobases, CSTs), but not average telomere length by itself, accounts for limited tissue renewal and turnover capacity. The impact of this parameter (which can be modified with different therapies) in chemotherapy-derived toxicity has not been studied.Blood from 115 treatment-naive patients from a clinical trial in early HER2-negative breast cancer that received weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 for 12 weeks) either alone or in combination with nintedanib and from 85 healthy controls was prospectively obtained and individual CSTs and average telomere lenght were determined by HT Q-FISH (high-throughput quantitative FISH). Toxicity was graded according to NCI common toxicity criteria for adverse events (NCI CTCAE V.4.0). The variable under study was "number of toxic episodes" during the 12 weeks of therapy.The percentage of CSTs ranged from 6.5%-49.4% and was directly associated with the number of toxic events (R2 = 0.333; P < 0.001). According to a linear regression model, each 18% increase in the percentage of CSTs was associated to one additional toxic episode during the paclitaxel cycles; this effect was independent of the age or treatment arm. Patients in the upper quartile (> 21.9% CSTs) had 2-fold higher number of neuropathy (P = 0.04) or fatigue (P = 0.019) episodes and >3-fold higher number of myalgia episodes (P = 0.005). The average telomere length was unrelated to the incidence of side effects.The percentage of CSTs, but not the average telomere size, is associated with weekly paclitaxel-derived toxicity.

Carboplatin plus Weekly Paclitaxel Combined with Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

AIM: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carboplatin plus weekly paclitaxel with bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB/IV or postoperative recurrent NSCLC (n=33) were treated with carboplatin (area under the curve of 6) on day 1; paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15; and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on day 1 repeated every 4 weeks, for four to six cycles; followed by maintenance bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 76%. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 8.4 months and 22.2 months, respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia in 55% of patients, anemia in 18%, febrile neutropenia in 12%, and anorexia in 9%. No treatment-related deaths were observed. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin plus weekly paclitaxel with bevacizumab was effective and well tolerated by patients with advanced NSCLC.