Types of Errors Hiding in Google Scholar Data.

Google Scholar (GS) is a free tool that may be used by researchers to analyze citations; find appropriate literature; or evaluate the quality of an author or a contender for tenure, promotion, a faculty position, funding, or research grants. GS has become a major bibliographic and citation database. For assessing the literature, databases, such as PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science, can be used in place of GS because they are more reliable. The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of citation data collected from GS and provide a comprehensive description of the errors and miscounts identified. For this purpose, 281 documents that cited 2 specific works were retrieved via Publish or Perish software (PoP) and were examined. This work studied the false-positive issue inherent in the analysis of neuroimaging data. The results revealed an unprecedented error rate, with 279 of 281 (99.3%) examined references containing at least one error. Nonacademic documents tended to contain more errors than academic publications (U=5117.0; P<.001). This viewpoint article, based on a case study examining GS data accuracy, shows that GS data not only fail to be accurate but also potentially expose researchers, who would use these data without verification, to substantial biases in their analyses and results. Further work must be conducted to assess the consequences of using GS data extracted by PoP.

A Framework for Anti-Racist Publication in Palliative Care: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes.

Systemic or structural racism describes an embedded pattern of explicit and implicit racial biases that, through policy and action, systematically confer advantage to white people and disadvantage Black, indigenous, and other people of color. Hospice and palliative care journals participate in this broader system of racial discrimination. Building on palliative care's explicit focus on patients' goals and values, which may in and of itself comprise a form of social justice in healthcare, palliative care journals and their publishers have an opportunity to lead others in cultivating anti-racist practices and explicitly promoting equity. The publication life cycle of submission and solicitation, manuscript peer-review, and publication provide a framework for examining the structures, processes, and outcomes by which palliative care and other journals might address systemic racism. We describe the current academic publishing landscape, which diminishes the voices and experiences of racial and ethnic minority patients and undermines the careers of under-represented scholars. We then propose reforms that we believe will improve publication equity and quality as well as healthcare outcomes. These include an Equity in Publication checklist, solicitation of manuscripts on equity-relevant topics, promotion of scholars through editorial structures and peer review processes, and a standard Equity Rating for publications. Greater efforts to include non-dominant voices in every aspect of publication, through appropriate recognition of their scholarship and remuneration for their efforts, will drive equity in health outcomes. By pursuing an anti-racist and equity-focused publishing agenda, hospice and palliative medicine journals and their publishers have an opportunity to transform healthcare.

Academic publications of full-time master of public health program students / 上海预防医学

Objective:To investigate academic publications of students of the full-time master of public health （professional degree， MPH） program and explore their research capacity. Methods:A total of 160 students of the full-time MPH program admitted from 2010 through 2014 were included in the study. Their academic publications were retrieved for analysis. Results:The average number of academic publications was 1.35. Moreover， 10.2% of the students had academic publications in Chinese journals， and 12.5% had publications in SCI-indexed English journals. Type of disciplines， province they were from， and economic status of their family were determined to be significantly associated with academic publications in SCI-indexed journals. Conclusion:Students of the full-time MPH program have research capacity； however， they have achieved relatively few academic publications of high quality. Establishment of a teaching and training program is warranted in both practice and research for students in full-time MPH programs in universities.

Global industrial park research trends: a bibliometric analysis from 1987 to 2016.

Industrial parks, which are characterized as a group of industrial businesses designed to meet the concomitant demands of different organizations within an area, have played an important role in the national development strategies of many countries. Industrial parks have received increasingly more attention over time. Nevertheless, few scholars have visually analyzed global scientific data. This paper quantitatively and visually examines global academic research papers on industrial parks from 1987 to 2016 by using a bibliometric analysis. A total of 1823 papers from Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Sciences Citation Index databases were analyzed. The distributions of authorship, keywords, countries/territories, and institutes were generated. According to data from Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Sciences Citation Index databases, the top five most productive authors (i.e., Geng Y. with 22 articles, Fujita T. with 17, El-Halwagi M.M. with 15, Zhang Y. with 14, and Tan R.R. with 12) have contributed significantly to industrial park research. Papers on industrial park research have mainly been from China, the USA, and Taiwan. The dominant keywords from industrial park research from 1987 to 2016 are "China", "system", "heavy metal", and "eco-industrial park". These keywords will be the hot topics in industrial park research in the future. The research findings can provide a reference for understanding the research development process and trends in analyses in the field of industrial parks.