Radiographic changes after alveolar ridge preservation using autogenous raw tooth particles versus xenograft: A prospective controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The use of extracted teeth has been introduced as an option for bone grafting. However, the current method requires special machines and solutions, posing significant time and cost. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of autogenous raw tooth particles (RTP), a grafting material made from a ground tooth using basic equipment, for alveolar ridge preservation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients (12 study/11 control), having 14 and 13 sites were included for the study and control groups (commercially available xenograft), respectively. Radiographic measurements were taken at the baseline and the 4-month follow-up appointment. Furthermore, a questionnaire survey concerning the general preference of the type of graft to receive (if needed), before and after knowing the price, was distributed at the completion of the procedure for patients to answer. RESULTS: Alveolar ridge width change was -1.03 ± 0.64 and -0.84 ± 0.35 for the study and the control groups, respectively. Regarding the height, the study group showed a buccal and lingual change of -0.66 ± 0.48 and -0.78 ± 0.81, respectively, while this was -0.78 ± 0.56 and -0.9 ± 0.41 for the xenograft group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups. Patients preferred the raw tooth particles over other grafting materials (p = .01). CONCLUSION: No core biopsies were taken to evaluate bone formation, which should be done in future studies. Within its limitations, the current study demonstrated that RTP graft could be an alternative graft for bone augmentation, offering a new cost-effective option for clinicians when available.

Analysis of perioperative autonomic nervous system activity to visualize stress in pediatric patients undergoing alveolar bone graft surgery.

Perioperative stress in pediatric patients is often difficult to assess via interviews; thus, an objective measure to assess perioperative stress is needed. To visualize perioperative stress, we observed autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity, circulatory dynamics, and psychological status in pediatric patients undergoing alveolar bone grafting under general anesthesia. This prospective observational study included 40 patients aged 8-12 years who were scheduled for alveolar bone grafting in our hospital. ANS activity was analyzed using heart rate variability the day before surgery, during general anesthesia, 2 h postoperatively, 24 h postoperatively, and the day before discharge. ANS assessment included LF/HF (sympathetic nervous system activity) and HF (parasympathetic nervous system activity). Additionally, heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), face scale (FS) score were recorded. Data from 31 patients, excluding dropouts, were analyzed. The ratio of change to the preoperative value was compared. After surgery, the LF/HF, HR, SBP, and FS score significantly increased (P < 0.01) and HF significantly decreased (2 h postoperatively: P < 0.05, 24 h postoperatively, before discharge: P < 0.01). SBP recovered to preoperative values 24 h postoperatively, and HR and FS scores recovered to preoperative values before discharge. However, even before discharge, LF/HF remained significantly higher than preoperative values, and HF remained significantly lower than preoperative values (P < 0.01). Conclusion We observed perioperative stress from multiple perspectives. Circulatory dynamics and psychological status recovered by the day before discharge; however, ANS activity did not. Therefore, evaluating ANS activity may be useful in visualizing potential perioperative stress in pediatric patients.

Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using a Collagenated Xenograft: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of cancellous bovine bone mineral granules and 10% porcine collagen (deproteinized bovine bone mineral with collagen [DBBM-C]; (OCS-B Collagen® [Straumann XenoFlex], NIBEC, Korea) in a mouldable block form, with or without socket seal, using autogenous free gingival graft (FGG). METHODS: Fifty-four patients were included and randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) spontaneous healing (control group), (2) alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) using DBBM-C (DBBM-C group), and (3) ARP employing DBBM-C sealed with FGG (DBBM-C/FGG group). Bone biopsy and implant fixture placement were performed 180 days after ARP. Cone-beam computed tomography, histological analysis, implant stability, and three-dimensional volumetric analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Of the 54 patients, 4 dropped out owing to loss of follow-up and osseointegration failure. The changes in alveolar bone during follow-up were not significantly different. Between 84- and 180-day postextraction, the volume of the DBBM-C and DBBM-C/FGG groups was maintained at 3 mm below the alveolar ridge crest (0.72 ± 0.80 mm, 6.05 ± 6.69%), whereas the volume in the control group decreased (-0.37 ± 1.31 mm, -2.10% ± 8.37%) (P = .026). The DBBM-C/FGG group exhibited less horizontal ridge resorption at 1 mm below the alveolar crest (-9.19 ± 5.09 mm, -73.67% ± 32.53%) between preextraction and 84 days postextraction (P = .049). In all groups, the implant stability quotient remained above 70. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, both ARP using DBBM-C with and without socket sealing effectively preserved the width dimension of the alveolar ridge, with no significant difference in alveolar bone resorption. However, socket sealing appeared to enhance the stability of the bone graft and bone quality. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of DBBM-C for ARP seems to aid in volume maintenance as compared with spontaneous healing. Gingival sealing with an FGG can help maintain the width of the alveolar ridge. This clinical trial was not registered prior to participant recruitment and randomization. This study was registered at WHO ICTRP (https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=KCT0008266).

Osseous Outcomes of Cleft Alveolar Bone Grafting with Allograft and Platelet-Rich Fibrin: Preliminary Study with Radiological Outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Cleft lip and palate are the most common craniofacial malformations worldwide. The alveolar cleft is treated with a bone graft, between 4 and 7 years of age in mixed dentition. This is an important step because it provides good quality jawbone and a better support of the lip and the alar cartilage on the side of the cleft. Bone autografting with iliac harvesting remains the most commonly used technique, but it is not without risks. Allograft techniques have therefore been described to reduce this morbidity (pain, infectious risk, hemorrhagic risk, fracture risk). The aim of this study was to evaluate, one year after allografting, the efficiency and consolidation of the bone allograft in the alveolar cleft. SETTING: A retrospective study was conducted in the department of pediatric craniomaxillofacial surgery in the Woman-Mother-Child Hospital in Lyon, France. PATIENTS: This series includes 22 patients or 25 alveolar cleft bone grafts, including 16 boys and 6 girls, with an average age of 6.1 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantify the residual bone allograft by evaluating the ratio between the volume of the bone graft and the volume of the initial space on pre- and post-operative cone beam computed tomography. RESULTS: The residual bone allograft percentage at 1 year was 58.5% (± 22.3). CONCLUSIONS: Alveolar cleft bone graft with bone allograft is an alternative to iliac autografting to reduce donor site morbidity.

Speech Outcomes after Delayed Hard Palate Closure and Synchronous Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Cleft Lip, Alveolus and Palate.

Background The best timing of closure of the hard palate in individuals with cleft lip, alveolus, and palate (CLAP) to reach the optimal speech outcomes and maxillary growth is still a subject of debate. This study evaluates changes in compensatory articulatory patterns and resonance in patients with unilateral and bilateral CLAP who underwent simultaneous closure of the hard palate and secondary alveolar bone grafting (ABG). Methods A retrospective study of patients with nonsyndromic unilateral and bilateral CLAP who underwent delayed hard palate closure (DHPC) simultaneously with ABG at 9 to 12 years of age from 2013 to 2018. The articulatory patterns, nasality, degree of hypernasality, facial grimacing, and speech intelligibility were assessed pre- and postoperatively. Results Forty-eight patients were included. DHPC and ABG were performed at the mean age of 10.5 years. Postoperatively hypernasal speech was still present in 54% of patients; however, the degree of hypernasality decreased in 67% ( p < 0.001). Grimacing decreased in 27% ( p = 0.015). Articulation disorders remained present in 85% ( p = 0.375). Intelligible speech (grade 1 or 2) was observed in 71 compared with 35% of patients preoperatively ( p < 0.001). Conclusion This study showed an improved resonance and intelligibility following DHPC at the mean age of 10.5 years, however compensatory articulation errors persisted. Sequential treatments such as speech therapy play a key role in improvement of speech and may reduce remaining compensatory mechanisms following DHPC.

Comprehensive three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography assessment unilateral alveolar cleft reconstruction using autologous iliac cancellous bone combined with deproteinized bovine bone: A clinical retrospective evaluation.

Large-volume autologous iliac cancellous bone grafting for alveolar cleft may lead to undesirable bone resorption and susceptible donor-site morbidity, whereas the addition of deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) could optimize outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combining autologous iliac bone with DBB using three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (3D-CBCT) for better analysis of bone generation than conventional evaluation methods. Thirty-six patients with unilateral alveolar cleft were assigned into two groups. Group A (n = 21) underwent autogenous cancellous bone graft harvested from the anterior iliac crests, while Group B (n = 15) received a composite of autogenous iliac cancellous bone and DBB. Patients in Group B displayed higher bone filling rates (P < 0.0001) and lower bone absorption rates (P < 0.001) than those in Group A at both 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Additionally, there were directional differences in bone absorption within the bone grafts, with more absorption observed on the alveolar crest and palatal sides than that on the nasal and labial sides (P < 0.001). This study demonstrates that employing a combination of DBB and autologous bone in alveolar cleft repair achieves better outcomes of bone grafting.

Rehabilitation Using Implants with Sloped Platform Edge vs. Standard Platform with Guided Bone Regeneration: A Randomized Control Clinical Trial.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the vertical bone loss after using different techniques: sloped implants or standard implants with guided bone regeneration. Patients with tooth gap and horizontal bone deficiency were randomly allocated to the test group (implants with sloped platform-SLP) and control group (standard design implants with guided bone regeneration-GBR). The primary outcome was bone loss (6 months after finishing the prosthetic treatment). Secondary outcomes included the following: patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), post-operative edema, keratinized mucosa width, and pink aesthetic score (PES). The average bone loss at 6 months was 0.23 ± 0.15 mm and 1.03 ± 0.37 mm in the SLP and GBR groups, respectively. The SLP group was characterized by lower pain intensity the first 7 days (p < 0.001), lower post-operative edema (p < 0.001), lower consumption of NSAIDs on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 (p = 0.002, <0.001, <0.001, and 0.008), and lower total OHIP-14 (p = 0.047) on day 7. The keratinized mucosa width was 3.7 (3.4-4.0) mm and 2 (1.4-2.0) mm in the SLP and GBR groups, respectively. The preservation of the mesial, distal papillae, and the level of soft tissue correspondence were significantly higher in the SLP group (p = 0.003, 0.038, <0.001). In the SLP group, more natural color and better texture of soft tissues were found (p = 0.048, p = 0.041). The use of implants with a sloped platform resulted in superior outcomes compared to the standard-design implants with GBR.

Recombinant human fibroblast growth factor and autogenous bone for periodontal regeneration: Alone or in combination? A randomized clinical trial.

AIM: To compare the outcomes of therapy using recombinant human fibroblast growth factor (rhFGF)-2 combined with autologous bone grafting (ABG) therapy with those of rhFGF-2 alone and ABG alone in the treatment of periodontal intraosseous defects. METHODS: Periodontal intraosseous defects were randomized to receive rhFGF-2 therapy + ABG, rhFGF-2 therapy alone, or ABG alone. Periodontal examination and periapical radiography were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At the 12 months follow-up, all three groups showed significant improvement in the clinical attachment level (CAL): 5.6 ± 1.6, 5.8 ± 1.7, and 5.2 ± 1.6 mm in the rhFGF-2 + ABG, rhFGF-2 alone, and ABG alone groups, respectively, with no significant inter-group differences (p < .05). rhFGF-2 therapy (alone or in combination) resulted in greater bone defect filling (BDF) (2.3 ± 1.2 mm and 2.6 ± 1.9 mm, respectively) than ABG therapy alone (1.2 ± 1.2 mm). Gingival recession was lesser in the ABG alone (1.2 ± 1.1 mm) and rhFGF-2 + ABG groups (1.4 ± 0.8 mm) than in the rhFGF-2 alone group (2.2 ± 1.2 mm). CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that at 12 months postoperatively, all treatments resulted in statistically significant clinical improvements compared to the baseline. From these results, it can be concluded that rhFGF-2 promotes hard tissue regeneration in intraosseous defects.

Inpatient versus Outpatient Alveolar Bone Grafting: A Nationwide Cost Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative outcomes and costs between inpatient and outpatient ABG in the United States. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Multi-institutional/national. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent ABG (n = 6649) were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database from 2012-2021. Inpatient and outpatient cohorts were matched using coarsened exact matching. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S): Thirty-day readmission, reoperation, and complications. A modified Markov model was developed to estimate the cost difference between cohorts. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: After matching, 3718 patients were included, of which 1859 patients were in each hospital-setting cohort. The inpatient cohort had significantly higher rates of reoperations (0.6% vs. 0.2%; p = 0.032) and surgical site infections (0.8% vs. 0.2%; p = 0.018). The total cost of outpatient ABG was estimated to be $10,824 vs. $20,955 for inpatient ABG, resulting in $10,131 cost savings per patient. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that all 10,000 simulations resulted in consistent cost savings for the outpatient cohort that ranged from $8000 to $24,000. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient ABG has become increasingly more popular over the past ten years, with a majority of cases being performed in the ambulatory setting. If deemed safe for the individual patient, outpatient ABG may confer a lower risk of nosocomial complications and offer significant cost savings to the healthcare economy.

Spontaneous regeneration of bone following mandibular ramus bone harvesting: a CBCT analysis.

The aim of this study was to evaluate healing at the donor site following autogenous block graft harvesting from the mandibular ramus. In this retrospective study, cone beam computed tomography images taken at different time-points were examined, and the volumes of preoperative and postoperative regions of interest were calculated in the software. Images were classified into four groups: 0-3 months, 4-6 months, 7-12 months, and >12 months post-surgery. To characterize the healing process over time, statistical analyses were conducted for both the 70% and 80% healing thresholds. Nearly half (n = 15, 47%) of the 32 patients included in this study achieved 70% bone healing within 4-12 months post-surgery. At the end of the 28-month period covered by this study, 21 patients (66%) had achieved 70% bone healing. The median time to achieve 70% healing was 9 months, while the median time to achieve 80% healing was 28 months. The findings of this study validate the feasibility of reutilizing the mandibular ramus area for additional bone augmentation when other intraoral sites are unavailable.

The effect of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) versus freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) used in alveolar ridge preservation on the peri-implant soft and hard tissues: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of alveolar ridge preservation on bone regeneration and tissue healing has been thoroughly documented in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate the peri-implant soft and hard tissue changes after alveolar ridge preservation using either platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) or freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) over a 12-month period following the prosthetic loading of implants. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, 40 individuals were recruited for alveolar ridge preservation using (1) FDBA or (2) PRF in incisal/premolar areas. At two follow-up sessions (six- and 12-months post-implant insertion), radiographic imaging and clinical examinations assessed marginal bone loss and soft tissue factors, including gingival recession and bleeding on probing. The differences between study groups were analyzed using Generalized estimating Equations, the Binary logistic regression model, and Cochran's Q test. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference regarding gingival recession at both follow-up evaluations; values in the PRF group were considerably lower compared to the FDBA group (p < 0.05). The mean values for vertical marginal bone loss and bleeding on probing showed no significant differences between the two study groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Except for gingival recession, applying PRF yielded comparable clinical results to FDBA after one year of implant loading and could be recommended as a potential biomaterial for alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extractions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The research protocol was registered in the Protocol Registration and Results System on 13/08/2021, available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (NCT05005377).

Characterization and functional prediction of the dental plaque microbiome in patients with alveolar clefts.

Introduction: Alveolar cleft (AC) is a common congenital defect in people with cleft lip and palate (CLP). Alveolar bone grafting (ABG) is typically performed during adolescence, resulting in the fissure remaining in the mouth for a longer length of time. Patients with AC have a greater rate of oral diseases such as dental caries than the normal population, and the precise characteristics of the bacterial alterations caused by AC are unknown. Methods: We recruited a total of 87 subjects and collected dental plaque samples from AC adolescents (AAP), post-operative ABG adolescents (PAP), healthy control adolescents (CAP), AC young adults (AYP), post-operative ABG young adults (PYP), and healthy control young adults (CYP). The sequencing of 16S rRNA genes was performed. Results: The microbial composition of plaque from alveolar cleft patients differed significantly from age-matched healthy controls. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis revealed that AAP was enriched for Neisseria, Haemophilus, Fusobacterium, Rhodococcus, Aggregatibacter, Gemella, and Porphyromonas, whereas AYP was enriched for Capnocytophaga, Rhodococcus, and Actinomyces-f0332. There were phenotypic differences in facultatively anaerobic, Gram-negative, Gram-positive, and oxidative stress tolerance between the AYP group with longer alveolar cleft and the healthy control group according to Bugbase phenotypic predictions. Alveolar bone grafting did not alter the functional phenotype of alveolar cleft patients but reduced the number of differential genera between alveolar cleft patients and healthy controls at both ages. Conclusions: Our study systematically characterized the supragingival plaque microbiota of alveolar cleft patients, post-alveolar bone grafting patients, and matched healthy controls in two ages to gain a better understanding of plaque ecology and microbiology associated with alveolar clefts.

Anatomical Basis for Preservation of Cartilaginous Apophysis in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvest: A Cohort Study.

Background The anterior iliac crest is the workhorse for the harvest of cancellous bone in children undergoing cleft alveolar bone grafting. However, the complexity of the anatomy makes the process of harvesting graft technique sensitive. The aim was to describe the outcomes of the medially based trap door method of graft harvest in pediatric patients undergoing cleft alveolar bone grafting. Methods A cohort study was conducted, including all the patients in the age group of 8-12 years. Alveolar bone grafting was performed after harvesting a cancellous graft from the iliac crest bone grafting (ICBG) using a medially based trap door approach. Intraoperative time, average blood loss, and postoperative outcomes, including pain score, paresthesia, and gait disturbances, were recorded. Results A total of 28 patients were included in the study based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The volume of cancellous bone harvested was between 4-9 cc. The mean intraoperative time was 42 minutes, with an average blood loss of 36 to 48 ml. The average visual analog scale (VAS) score in the postoperative period was 3.5, 6, and 4 on the first, third, and seventh postoperative days. All the patients were ambulated on the second postoperative day, and none of them reported paresthesia. Long-term evaluation of the anterior illum revealed intact crestal morphology with a bone refill on the posterior-anterior (PA) pelvic X-ray. Conclusion A medially based modified trap door approach is more efficacious and less morbid for the harvest of ICBG in pediatric patients.

Does the adjunctive use of autologous platelet concentrate during secondary alveolar bone grafting reduce the risk of wound dehiscence? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wound dehiscence is a common complication after secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG), leading to unfavourable surgical outcomes. Studies have shown that autologous platelet concentrates (APC) may enhance wound healing and improve outcomes. Therefore, this review aimed to evaluate in patients with alveolar clefts, whether using APC and iliac crest bone graft can mitigate the likelihood of wound dehiscence formation compared with those who underwent iliac bone grafting only following SABG. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using various electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, Ovid MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane Library, and grey literature, to include studies until July 31, 2023, without any restriction to language and time of publication. Only randomized (RCT) and controlled (CCT) clinical trials were included. Two independent reviewers screened the studies based on the predefined criteria, after which a qualitative and quantitative analysis was conducted. The search yielded 821 studies, of which seven were deemed eligible for systematic review. The risk of bias assessment done using "The Cochrane collaboration tool for risk of bias assessment" for six RCTs and the "Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions" for one CCT revealed a moderate to high risk of bias. The meta-analysis of five studies showed that the overall risk of developing wound dehiscence was lower in the APC group (RR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.71; p = 0.005; χ2 = 0.82; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analyses based on study design further supported these findings. Although the adjuvant use of APC for alveolar cleft reconstruction reduces the risk of wound dehiscence, more studies with increased scientific rigour and fewer confounding variables are warranted.

Two-Step Periosteal Releasing Incision for Tension-Free Flap Closure After Implant Placement With Simultaneous Guided Bone Regeneration.

We evaluated the effect of periosteal-releasing incisions on flap displacement in anterior maxillary sites following implant placement and simultaneously guided bone regeneration. Thirty patients, each requiring a single dental implant and guided bone regeneration in the maxillary esthetic zone, were recruited. After full-thickness flap elevation, the displacement of the flap was measured under a standardized tension of 1 Ncm. Then, a 2-step periosteal releasing incision was placed in the internal aspect of the flap, and the displacement was remeasured using the same standardized tension. Keratinized tissue width and mucosal thickness at the surgical site were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed at the 7- and 14-day recall visits. Flap displacement (primary outcome) was calculated before and after periosteal-releasing incisions. Multivariable linear regression models were used to evaluate the influence of mucosal thickness on flap displacement and adjusted for Keratinized tissue width. Primary wound closure was achieved in all patients. The mean difference in flap coronal displacement before and after the periosteal-releasing incisions was 8.2 mm (p < .0001). Adjusted regression models showed no association between mucosal thickness and keratinized tissue width with the amount of flap displacement (p = .770). Patient-reported outcome measures for pain, swelling, and bleeding amounted to 1.28 ± 1.93, 1.36 ± 1.87, and 0.0 ± 0.0 at 7 days and 0.11 ± 0.57, 0.56 ± 1.03, and 0.0 ± 0.0 at 14 days, respectively. Periosteal-releasing incisions using the 2-step procedure described here are a predictable technique to obtain coronal flap displacements >8 mm without increased surgical complications.

Timing of Alveolar Bone Graft and Barriers to Care.

OBJECTIVE: The current standard timing for alveolar bone grafting (ABG) occurs during mixed dentition, typically between the ages of six and twelve. A delay in receiving this operation is associated with an increase in graft loss and an overall thinner maxilla. This study aims to determine whether socioeconomic barriers are associated with a delay in timely ABG. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of patients who received ABG at our institution since 2012. Patient demographics, cleft classifications, operative details, and surgical dates were examined. A logistic regression model was created using socioeconomic variables to predict patients receiving delayed ABG. Significant variables were then included in a backwards selection logistic regression, followed by a final analysis of maximum likelihood estimates. SETTING: Single-institution, primary cleft care center. PATIENTS: 202 patients with cleft palates who underwent ABG. INTERVENTIONS: ABG. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Timing in which patients received ABG: standard (6-12 years) and delayed (>12 years). RESULTS: Female sex was a protective factor in the timing of ABG in our initial univariate analysis (OR = 0.44; p = .015). Socioeconomic factors resulting in delayed presentation for ABG include median income (OR = 1.0; p = .018) and public insurance status (OR = 3.75; p < .001). Median income, sex, and driving distance to the cleft clinic were not significant following backward elimination, however, private insurance status remained significant (OR = 3.71; p = .0001). CONCLUSION: Patients with public insurance are approximately 3.75 times more likely to receive ABG during permanent dentition. Multidisciplinary teams should work closely with patients on public insurance to ensure timely delivery of ABG.Level of Evidence III, Retrospective.

Histologic wound healing in studies using different ridge preservation protocols: A review.

BACKGROUND: Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures are designed to lessen dimensional changes in the alveolar ridge after tooth extraction. Wound healing after ridge preservation involves the formation of new vital bone in the former socket, and this vital bone is important in the osseointegration of dental implants. METHODS: A series of ARP studies have been performed to help clinicians better understand the wound-healing events that occur following tooth extraction and ridge preservation. Different protocols have been examined using various materials and periods of healing time prior to implant placement. The primary aim of these studies was to ascertain the relative percentage of vital bone formation, residual graft material, and connective tissue (CT)/other at the healing site using histomorphometric examination of bone core biopsies obtained during osteotomy preparation. RESULTS: For allografts, the use of demineralized bone alone or in combination with mineralized is associated with more vital bone formation than the use of mineralized allograft alone. For mineralized allografts, the use of cortical versus cancellous bone has only minimal impact on new bone formation. Xenografts from bovine and porcine sources appear to have similar vital bone formation. Longer healing times prior to implant placement are associated with increased vital bone formation and decreased residual graft material. The most stable component in most studies is the percentage of CT/other. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of vital bone and residual graft at ARP sites is dependent on the materials used and the length of healing time prior to obtaining core biopsies. KEY POINTS: What factors may affect the amount of new bone at the ARP site? At a time point about 4 months after ARP, the type of graft material used for ARP plays a large role in new bone formation. Studies focus on means and standard deviations, but patients often do not "follow the mean." Even if a single ARP protocol is used for all patients, there is great interindividual variability in new bone formation, and there is often variability between sites within a single patient. How long after ARP with an allograft should I wait to place an implant? Longer healing times such as 4-5 months generally provide higher amounts of vital bone formation than shorter healing times like 2-3 months. Differences in vital bone formation between ARP protocols tend to decrease with longer healing time. FDBA that contains demineralized bone, either alone or combined with mineralized FDBA, often provides higher amounts of new bone formation than 100% mineralized allograft, especially at shorter healing periods. Even a year after ARP with an allograft, residual graft material is often still present at the ARP site.

Evaluating risk factors and complications in mandibular ramus block grafting: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective cohort study aimed to identify the complications and risk factors associated with alveolar grafting using autologous mandibular ramus grafts, guided by the research question: What are the complications encountered in patients undergoing alveolar bone grafting using autologous mandibular ramus block and what are the risk factors associated with the development of these complications? MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 70 patients who underwent alveolar crest augmentation with autologous mandibular ramus block grafting. Intraoperative, early postoperative, and late postoperative complications were analyzed, as were various risk factors. RESULTS: The results showed that the majority of patients had successful outcomes with minimal complications. Sex was found to significantly influence the visibility of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). Early postoperative complications were associated with IAN visibility and the use of a single screw for graft fixation. Late postoperative complications were significantly associated with the presence of infection. CONCLUSION: The findings emphasize the importance of careful surgical techniques, infection prevention, and patient selection in minimizing complications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This article may contribute to clinicians' and so patients' understanding of potential risk factors associated with over all ramus block grafting procedure. Based on this information, clinicians can also improve their ability to manage risk factors and associated complications and compare ramus block grafting with other alternatives to determine the best treatment approach for that particular patient.

A meta-analysis of alveolar bone grafting using bone substitutes in cleft lip and palate patients.

In individuals with cleft lip and palate (CLP), an alveolar bone graft (ABG) is carried out for alveolar cleft closure. Several sources for ABG include autologous bone, xenologous bone, and alloplastic substitutes. Autologous bone has been the preferred source for ABG. Alloplastic substitutes might serve as an alternative. This study aimed to compare the outcomes between autologous and alloplastic as sources for ABG. This study made use of eight web databases. Randomized control trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs were included. CLP patients with alveolar cleft with imaging studies, computed tomography (CT scan) and/or cone beam CT scan, and bone graft volume within 6-12 months postintervention were selected. Bone graft volume within 6-12 months postintervention was assessed. Three studies met the inclusion criteria. After 6-12 months of follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in bone graft volume between autologous and alloplastic bone grafts (fixed-effect model estimate value = 0.21; confidence interval - 0.301-0.730; P = 0.414). The limitations include small research sample sizes, a high likelihood of bias among included studies, and different alloplastic materials from each included study. Autologous and alloplastic bone grafts showed similar effectiveness in alveolar bone grafting. Further clinical trial studies with bigger sample sizes and similar interventions are needed as evidence for future reviews.

Validation and comparison of 2D grading scales and 3D volumetric measurements for outcome assessment of bone-grafted alveolar clefts in children.

BACKGROUND: Several methods have been proposed to assess outcome of bone-grafted alveolar clefts on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), but so far these methods have not been compared and clinically validated. OBJECTIVES: To validate and compare methods for outcome assessment of bone-grafted clefts with CBCT and provide recommendations for follow-up. METHODS: In this observational follow-up study, two grading scales (Suomalainen; Liu) and the volumetric bone fill (BF) were used to assess the outcome of 23 autogenous bone-grafted unilateral alveolar clefts. The mean age at bone grafting was 9 years. The volumetric BF was assessed in five vertical sections. The bone-grafted cleft outcome was based on a binary coding (success or regraft) on a clinical multidisciplinary expert consensus meeting. Grading scales and volumetric assessment were compared in relation to the bone-grafted cleft outcome (success or regraft). Reliability for the different outcome variables was analyzed with intra-class correlation and by calculating kappa values. LIMITATIONS: The study had a limited sample size. Clinical CBCT acquisitions had a varying tube current and exposure time. RESULTS: Volumetric 3D measurements allowed for outcome assessment of bone-grafted alveolar clefts with high reliability and validity. The two grading scales showed highly reliable outcomes, yet the validity was high for the Suomalainen grading scale but low for the Liu grading scale. CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric 3D measurement as well as the Suomalainen grading can be recommended for outcome assessment of the bone-grafted cleft. Yet, one must always make a patient-specific assessment if there is a need to regraft.