Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Periodontol ; 51(8): 1017-1033, 2024 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38685818

RESUMO

AIM: To assess the efficacy of heterologous fibrin biopolymer (HFB) in promoting alveolar bone healing after tooth extraction in rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The upper right incisors of 48 Wistar rats were extracted. Toothless sockets were filled with HFB (HFBG, n = 24) or blood clot (BCG, n = 24). The tooth extraction sites were subjected to micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), histological, histomorphometric and immunohistochemical (for Runt-related transcription factor 2/Runx2 and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase/TRAP) analyses on days 0, 7, 14 and 42 after extraction. RESULTS: Socket volume remained similar between days 0 and 14 (69 ± 5.4 mm3), except in the BCG on day 14, when it was 10% lower (p = .043). Although the number of Runx2+ osteoblasts was high and similar in both groups (34 × 102 cells/mm2), the HFBG showed lower inflammatory process and osteoclast activity than BCG at 7 days. On day 14, the number of Runx2+ osteoblasts remained high and similar to the previous period in both groups. However, osteoclast activity increased. This increase was 55% lower in the HFBG than BCG. In the BCG, the presence of an inflammatory process and larger and numerous osteoclasts on day 14 led to resorption of the alveolar bone ridge and newly formed bone. On day 42, numbers of Runx2+ osteoblast and TRAP+ osteoclasts decreased dramatically in both groups. Although the BCG exhibited a more mature cortical bone formation, it exhibited a higher socket reduction (28.3 ± 6.67%) and smaller bone volume (37 ± 5.8 mm3) compared with HFBG (socket reduction of 14.8 ± 7.14% and total bone volume of 46 ± 5.4 mm3). CONCLUSIONS: HFB effectively suppresses osteoclast activity and reduces alveolar bone resorption compared with blood clot, thus preventing three-dimensional bone loss, particularly during the early healing period. HFB emerges as a promising biopharmaceutical material for enhancing healing processes after tooth extraction.


Assuntos
Fibrina , Ratos Wistar , Extração Dentária , Alvéolo Dental , Cicatrização , Microtomografia por Raio-X , Animais , Alvéolo Dental/efeitos dos fármacos , Ratos , Cicatrização/efeitos dos fármacos , Fibrina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Biopolímeros/uso terapêutico , Biopolímeros/farmacologia , Processo Alveolar/efeitos dos fármacos , Processo Alveolar/patologia , Processo Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoclastos/efeitos dos fármacos
2.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res ; 26(1): 4-14, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37674334

RESUMO

AIM: The present systematic review aimed to identify and summarize the clinical, radiographic, and histological outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation using bone xenografts and absorbable sealing materials compared with spontaneous healing in the esthetic zone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) fulfilling specific eligibility criteria were included. Two review authors independently searched for eligible studies, extracted data from the published reports and performed the risk of bias assessment (RoB 2 tool). Study results were summarized using random effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: Thirteen articles concerning 10 RCTs were included, involving a total of 357 participants. Most of studies were considered as "low" risk of bias. Meta-analyses indicated less horizontal (difference in means-MD = 1.88 mm; p < 0.001), vertical mid-buccal (MD = 1.84 mm; p < 0.001) and vertical mid-lingual (MD = 2.27 mm; p < 0.001) bone resorption in alveolar ridge preservation compared to spontaneous healing as assessed clinically. Bone changes assessed radiographically showed consistent results in terms of horizontal (at 1 mm: MD = 1.84 mm, p < 0.001), vertical mid-buccal (MD = 0.95 mm; p < 0.001) and mid-lingual (MD = 0.62 mm; p = 0.05) resorption. Part of the bone resorption in the spontaneous healing group was compensated by soft-tissues, since the observed differences between groups in linear ridge reduction evaluated through cast models superimposition were smaller (MD = 0.52 mm; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Alveolar ridge preservation with xenogeneic bone substitutes and non-autogenous resorbable socket sealing materials is efficacious in reducing post-extraction bone and ridge changes in the esthetic region.


Assuntos
Perda do Osso Alveolar , Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar , Humanos , Processo Alveolar/cirurgia , Alvéolo Dental/cirurgia , Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar/métodos , Perda do Osso Alveolar/prevenção & controle , Perda do Osso Alveolar/cirurgia , Xenoenxertos , Remissão Espontânea , Extração Dentária/métodos , Estética Dentária
3.
Periodontol 2000 ; 91(1): 65-88, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35913046

RESUMO

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the benefit of ridge preservation (RP) with minimally invasive (MI) approaches with or without concomitant implant placement on morbidity, esthetics, and patient-related outcomes. Three Internet sources were used to search for appropriate papers. The search strategy was designed to include any clinical study published on RP with MI approaches such as flapless surgery, socket shield and socket sealing techniques and, use of biological agents. Characteristics of the individual studies, regarding methodological aspects, quantitative and qualitative data were extracted. The potential risk of bias was estimated, and the acquired evidence was graded. Independent screening of 860 reports resulted in 26 included original articles. Nine publications evaluated MI approaches for RP without concomitant implant placement. Eleven studies evaluated interventions for RP with immediate implant placement (IIP). Six studies compared RP with IIP vs RP without IIP. This systematic review found that MI approaches in most of the studies failed to improve clinical variables regarding morbidity, esthetics, and patient-related outcomes. Based on the limited number of studies analyzed and the methodological discrepancies observed, it is not possible to confirm that MI approaches promote a significant benefit when applied to RP procedures.


Assuntos
Processo Alveolar , Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar , Humanos , Alvéolo Dental/cirurgia , Extração Dentária
4.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1405306

RESUMO

RESUMEN: Actualmente existen varias alternativas para prevenir, disminuir y corregir deformidades en el reborde alveolar, originadas por la reabsorción ósea al momento de la extracción de uno o varios dientes. La preservación alveolar es cualquier procedimiento que se realiza al momento de una extracción y permite conservar las dimensiones y el contorno del alveolo. Hay diversas técnicas para preservación las cuales están diseñadas para prevenir tanto como sea posible los cambios ocurridos al retirar un órgano dentario. El tratamiento de elección para reemplazar la funcionalidad, estabilidad biológica y estética de un diente, es a través de la colocación de implantes dentales, cuya colocación posterior a la preservación alveolar reduce los cambios dimensionales del reborde alveolar. La recientemente propuesta técnica de preservación alveolar BARP, "Biologically-oriented Alveolar Ridge Preservation" por sus siglas en Inglés, logró preservar las dimensiones de la cresta alveolar, al tiempo que restringe cualquier interferencia sobre el biomaterial.


ABSTRACT: Nowadays there are several choices, to prevent, reduce and correct alveolar ridge deformities caused by resorption at the time of extracting one or several teeth. Alveolar ridge preservation is defined as any procedure performed, following any dental extraction that allows the dimensions of the alveolus to be preserved. Those techniques of alveolar ridge preservation are designed to prevent as many reabsorption changes that occur after dental extraction. The best choice to replace the functionality, biological stability, and esthetic, of natural teeth is to place a dental implant. The placement of the alveolar ridge preservation treatment reduces the dimensional changes over the alveolar ridge. The recently proposed technique to alveolar ridge preservation called BARP or "Biologically-oriented Alveolar Ridge Preservation" managed to preserve the alveolar ridge dimensions while restricting any interference with the biomaterial at the same time.

5.
Braz. dent. j ; Braz. dent. j;33(3): 82-91, July-Sept. 2022. graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS, BBO - Odontologia | ID: biblio-1384027

RESUMO

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate a Demineralized Human Dentine Matrix (DHDM) as viable biomaterial for alveolar ridge preservation in a rat model. Wistar rats were submitted to the extraction of maxillary first molars bilaterally. Sockets were filled with biomaterials and divided into 4 experimental groups (n=5): blood clot, autogenous bone, bovine-derived xenograft (BDX) and DHDM. Animals were sacrificed at 7, 14 e 28 days. Microtomography (uCT) volumetric evaluation and qualitative histological analyses were performed. Results obtained through the uCT showed similar values between the DHDM and the other experimental groups. The histological evaluation demonstrated DHDM with an unspecific inflammatory process and bone neoformation with slow reabsorption of the material. This result indicates that DHDM implanted in rat sockets is biocompatible and reduces the alveolar ridge volume loss after tooth extraction.


Resumo O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a Matriz Dentinária Humana Desmineralizada (MDHD) como biomaterial viável para preservação do rebordo alveolar, no modelo em rato. Ratos Wistar foram submetidos à exodontias dos primeiros molares superiores bilateralmente. Os alvéolos foram preenchidos com biomateriais e divididos em 4 grupos experimentais (n=5): coágulo sanguíneo, osso autógeno, osso xenógeno de origem bovina e MDHD. Os animais foram sacrificados aos 7, 14 e 28 dias. Foram realizadas avaliações volumétricas por microtomografia (uCT) e análises histológicas qualitativas. Os resultados obtidos por meio do uCT mostraram valores semelhantes entre o MDHD e os demais grupos experimentais. A avaliação histológica demonstrou MDHD com processo inflamatório inespecífico e neoformação óssea com lenta reabsorção do material. Esse resultado indica que a MDHD implantada em alvéolo de rato é biocompatível e reduz a perda de volume do rebordo alveolar após extração dentária.

6.
J Clin Periodontol ; 49(7): 694-705, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35451071

RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of different techniques to seal the alveolus (flap advancement [FA], open healing with barrier [OHB], and open healing without barrier [OHNB]) during alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in terms of horizontal ridge width resorption. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized trials of at least 2 months duration comparing at least two techniques to seal the alveolus against each other or against spontaneous healing (SH) were eligible. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Central. Conventional meta-analysis, meta-regression, and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted, with clinical and tomographic ridge width changes as outcomes. Predictive intervals (95% PI) were reported. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included, accounting for 52 study arms. Meta-regression identified that the socket sealing technique and publication year explained the observed heterogeneity. NMA showed that FA and OHB led to significantly lower ridge resorption than SH, resulting in 1.18 mm (95% PI 0.21-2.13) and 1.10 mm (95% PI 0.49-1.69) wide alveolar ridges, respectively. No significant difference between OHNB and SH was found (0.46 mm, 95% PI -0.70 to 1.64). The treatment with the largest probability for ARP was FA (52.7%), followed by OHB (39.1%) and OHNB (8.2%). CONCLUSIONS: FA and OHB are efficacious techniques to seal the alveolus during ARP.


Assuntos
Perda do Osso Alveolar , Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar , Perda do Osso Alveolar/prevenção & controle , Perda do Osso Alveolar/cirurgia , Processo Alveolar/cirurgia , Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar/métodos , Humanos , Metanálise em Rede , Extração Dentária , Alvéolo Dental/cirurgia
7.
Int. j. odontostomatol. (Print) ; 15(3): 616-625, sept. 2021. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1385783

RESUMO

The present study investigated the healing response of 12 fresh post-extraction alveolous grafted with particulate autologous teeth to achieve preservation of the post-extraction alveolar ridge. The objective is to elucidate the osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties of the autologous dental graft used as a bone substitute in the alveolar ridge preservation technique. Five patients were included, with at least one hopeless tooth and in need of extraction and preservatio n of the ridge, to receive in the same place a dental implant in prosthetic replacement. In the first surgical stage, dental extractions and preservation of the alveolar ridge were performed, using the teeth extracted and processed with an automatic system as bone substitutes. In the second surgical stage, an incisional bone biopsy was performed in each grafted site, the bone beds were recapitulated in a drilling protocol that allowed the placement of the dental implant, and the harvested bone specimens were prepared for analysis. The histological results of the bone biopsies in all cases showed remnant particles of the dental graft, made up of dentin, partially resorbed, with irregular superficial edges and in close contact with newly forme d bone in transition to mature lamellar bone, in which well differentiated osteocytes were observed. The immunohistochemical results showed a moderate positive expression of osteopontin at the edges of the integrated teeth particles, inside the peritubular dentin space and at the osteodental contact interfaces. In conclusion, the evidence from the study shows that the autologous dental graft is a biocompatible bone substitute, that provides an osteoconductive scaffold that promotes bone cell adhesion and migration for local osteogenesis and that it is associated with moderate in situ expression of osteopontin, which showed a high affinity with mineralized dental tissue, suggesting osteoinductive properties in situ.


El presente estudio investigó el resultado cicatrizal de 12 alvéolos frescos postextracción injertados con dientes autólogos particulados para lograr la preservación del reborde alveolar postextracción. El objetivo es dilucidar las propiedades osteoconductivas y osteoinductivas del injerto dental autólogo utilizado como sustituto óseo en la técnica de preservación de reborde. Se incluyeron 5 pacientes, con al menos un diente sin esperanza y con necesidad de extracción y preservación del reborde, para recibir en el mismo sitio un implante dental en sustitución protésica. En la primera etapa quirúrgica, se realizaron las extracciones dentales y la preservación del reborde alveolar, utilizando como sustituto óseo los dientes extraídos y procesados con un sistema automático. En la segunda etapa quirúrgica, se realizó una biopsia ósea incisional en cada sitio injertado, los lechos óseos fueron recapitulados en un protocolo de fresado que permitió la colocación del implante dental y los especímenes óseos recolectados fueron preparados para su análisis. Los resultados histológicos de las biopsias óseas en todos los casos mostraron partículas remanentes del injerto dental, conformadas por dentina, parcialmente reabsorbidas, con margenes superficiales irregulares y en estrecho contacto con depósitos de hueso de reciente formación en transición hacia hueso laminar maduro, en el cual se observaron osteocitos bien diferenciados. Los resultados inmunohistoquímicos mostraron una expresión positiva moderada de osteopontina en los bordes de las partículas del injerto dental integrado, al interior del espacio peritubular dentinario y en las interfases de contacto osteodental. En conclusión, la evidencia del estudio muestra que el injerto dental autólogo es un sustituto óseo biocompatible, que provee un andamio osteoconductivo promotor de la adhesión y migración de las células óseas para la osteogénesis local y que está asociado a la expresión modera in situ de osteopontina, la cual mostro una alta afinidad con el tejido dental mineralizado, sugiriendo propiedades osteoinductivas in situ.


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Perda do Osso Alveolar/diagnóstico , Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar/métodos , Transplante Autólogo , Biópsia , Demografia , Perda do Osso Alveolar/cirurgia , Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Alvéolo Dental , Osteopontina/metabolismo , Processo Alveolar/cirurgia , Histologia
8.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 59(10): 1227-1232, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34256958

RESUMO

Our aim was to evaluate resorption of the alveolar ridge using the socket shield technique (SST) without immediate placement of dental implants. This randomised controlled clinical trial included 27 patients: 14 maxillary non-molar teeth were partially extracted using the SST (test group) and 13 were extracted using a minimally traumatic extraction approach (control group). Alterations in height and thickness of the alveolar ridge were evaluated by cone beam computed tomograms taken immediately after, and 100 days after, surgery. Minor resorption was observed in the height of the buccal and palatal plates, without intergroup difference (p ≥ 0.10). The test group showed significantly better preservation of the buccal-to-palatal crest dimension (p ≤ 0.05). In the control group, preservation of buccal plate thickness was significantly greater (p ≤ 0.05), but intragroup vertical resorption of the buccal plate and reduction in the buccal-to-palatal crest distance were greater (p ≤ 0.05). The SST without the immediate placement of implants showed greater preservation of the buccal-to-palatal crest dimension and lower preservation of buccal wall thickness compared with minimally traumatic extraction. In addition, it provided superior maintenance of the baseline buccal wall height. The modified SST is a promising approach, but factors that interfere with the results should be investigated.


Assuntos
Perda do Osso Alveolar , Implantes Dentários , Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário , Processo Alveolar , Humanos , Extração Dentária , Alvéolo Dental
9.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 32(6): 711-720, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33715258

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate dimensional changes, level of soft tissue healing, and pain/discomfort perception in post-extraction sockets filling with 1.2% simvastatin (SIM) gel covered with polypropylene membranes (PPPM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-six post-extraction sockets of posterior teeth were randomly allocated in two groups: (a) socket filling with 1.2% SIM gel and covered with PPPM (n = 13) and (b) socket filling with placebo gel and covered with PPPM (n = 13). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images before and 90 days after the extraction enabled alveolar bone dimensional changes calculation using horizontal and vertical measurements. The measurements occurred at three different levels for thickness located 1, 3, and 5 mm from the top of the bone crest. The vertical (depth) measure was assessed from the most apical portion of the socket to the bone crest's most coronal portion. Seven days after the extractions, the level of soft tissue healing and pain perception were also analyzed. RESULTS: After 90 days of extractions, the dimensional changes in thickness in the test group were significantly smaller in sections A (p = .044), B (p = .036) and C (p = .048) when compared to the control group. The test group showed a significantly lower height-dimensional change than the control group (p < .0001). Soft tissue healing index (p = .63), perception of pain (p = .23), and number of analgesics consumed (p = .25) were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin at 1.2% compared with placebo effectively reduced the dimensional changes in post-extraction sockets covered with PPPM. There was no significant difference in the level of soft tissue healing and postoperative pain between the test and control groups.


Assuntos
Perda do Osso Alveolar , Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar , Humanos , Polipropilenos , Sinvastatina/uso terapêutico , Extração Dentária , Alvéolo Dental/diagnóstico por imagem , Alvéolo Dental/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Braz. dent. j ; Braz. dent. j;31(5): 458-465, Sept.-Oct. 2020. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO - Odontologia | ID: biblio-1132332

RESUMO

Abstract This study aims to evaluate the post-extraction alveolar bone reconstruction amongst 12 patients exhibiting loss of buccal bone plate in a tooth of the anterior region of the maxilla using the prosthetically-driven alveolar reconstruction technique (PDAR). In PDAR, a partial fixed provisional prosthesis (PFPP [conventional or adhesive]) with a specially designed pontic maintains the clot in a mechanically stable position during alveolar regeneration. Moreover, the pontic design, in hourglass shape and located in the subgingival area, also prevents gingival margins from collapsing. Gingival recession was evaluated through the 6-month healing period. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed 1 month before and 8 months after PDAR treatment. For the primary outcome, in the panoramic imaging, the central area of bone defect in each tooth was selected for linear measurements. Measurements of the vertical buccal bone gain and the gain in thickness in the alveolar bone crest were obtained 8 months after PDAR. Descriptive statistics and intraclass correlation coefficient analysis were conducted. After treatment, all patients showed bone formation (a mean vertical gain of 7.1±3.7 mm, associated with a horizontal mean gain of 4.5±1.4 mm in the alveolar bone crest). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the measurements performed using CBCT was 0.999. No gingival recession, greater than 1 mm, was observed. Lower-morbidity procedures without the use of biomaterials may be a useful in post-extraction alveolar ridge regeneration and/or preservation. PDAR promoted alveolar bone formation without flaps, grafts and membranes.


Resumo Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a reconstrução do osso alveolar após extração em 12 pacientes com perda da tábua óssea vestibular em dentes na região anterior da maxila usando a técnica da reconstrução alveolar proteticamente guiada (RAPG). Na RAPG, uma prótese parcial fixa provisória (PPFP [convencional ou adesiva]) com um pôntico com design específico mantém o coágulo numa posição mecanicamente estável. Além disso, o design do pôntico, com formato de ampulheta e localizado na área subgengival, também previne o colapso das margens gengivais. A recessão gengival foi avaliada durante o período de cicatrização de 6 meses. Tomografias computadorizadas cone beam (TCCB) foram feitas 1 mês antes e 8 meses após o tratamento com a RAPG. Para o desfecho primário, nas imagens panorâmicas, a área central do defeito ósseo em cada dente foi selecionada para as medições lineares. As medições do ganho vertical ósseo vestibular e do ganho em espessura na crista óssea alveolar foram realizadas. A análise estística descritiva e a análise do coeficiente de correlação intraclasse forma realizados. Após o tratamento, todos os pacientes apresentaram formação óssea (ganho vertical médio de 7,1±3,7 mm, associado a ganho horizontal médio de 4,5±1,4 mm na crista óssea alveolar). O coeficiente de correlação intraclasse foi de 0,999. Nenhuma retração gengival acima de 1 mm foi observada. Procedimentos com baixa morbidade sem o uso de biomateriais podem ser úteis na regeneração/preservação do rebordo após as extrações. A RAPG promove a formação do osso alveolar sem o uso de retalhos, enxertos e membranas.


Assuntos
Humanos , Perda do Osso Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagem , Alvéolo Dental , Extração Dentária , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico , Processo Alveolar/cirurgia , Processo Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagem , Maxila
11.
CES odontol ; 25(2): 44-53, jul.-dic. 2012.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-671092

RESUMO

Bone resorption is a physiological consequence of tooth loss that could be a significant functional andan esthetic risk for dental implants. The dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge could be managedwith different graft materials and surgical techniques that have been reported in the scientific literature.The purpose of this review is to explore the indications and present actual techniques to help preventresidual ridge resorption, as much as possible, guaranteeing the success of Prosthodontic rehabilitationwith implants.


La reabsorción ósea es una consecuencia fisiológica de la pérdida dental que puede convertirse en un riesgofuncional y estético significativo para la colocación de implantes dentales. Los cambios dimensionales delreborde alveolar pueden ser manejados con diferentes materiales de injerto y procedimientos quirúrgicosreportados en la literatura. El propósito de esta revisión es presentar las indicaciones y técnicas actualesutilizadas para ayudar a prevenir, en lo posible, la reabsorción del reborde residual asegurando el éxitode la rehabilitación sobre implantes.


Assuntos
Humanos , Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar , Reabsorção Óssea , Transplante Ósseo , Implantes Dentários , Extração Dentária
12.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-627553

RESUMO

Durante más de cien años el sulfato de calcio se ha distinguido de otros biomateriales, por ser uno de los materiales aloplásticos más simples y que presenta la más larga historia clínica como material sintético. Entre sus principales propiedades destacan que es de fácil obtención, capacidad de osteoconducción, es totalmente absorbible, no provoca reacciones de inflamación o antigénicas, fácil modelado y fuerza de compresión semejante al tejido óseo. Todas éstas características son necesarias para ser usado como sustituto óseo. Sin embargo, diferencias en la morfología y estructura de sus cristales, la porosidad, propiedades mecánicas y en la constitución química del sulfato de calcio puede alterar significativamente sus propiedades biológicas. El objetivo de la presente revisión es conocer las propiedades del sulfato de calcio y sus diferentes aplicaciones clínicas como sustituto óseo en procedimientos regenerativos.


For over 100 years, the calcium sulfate has stood out from other biomaterials, for being one of the simplest alloplastic materials and having the longest history as synthetic material. It is readily available, has osteoconductive properties, is completely absorbed, does not cause inflammation or antigenic reactions, can be modeled to defect, has compressive strength similar to bone tissue and can be used as a vehicle for in situ release of chemotherapeutic agents. All these features are required to be used as a bone substitute. However, differences in morphology, crystal structure, porosity, mechanical properties and chemical constitution of calcium sulfate can significantly alter its biological properties. The aim of this study was to determine through a review of the literature, the properties of calcium sulfate and its various clinical applications as bone substitute in regenerative procedures.


Assuntos
Humanos , Materiais Dentários/química , Sulfato de Cálcio/química , Materiais Biocompatíveis , Regeneração Óssea , Transplante Ósseo , Implantes Dentários , Cirurgia Bucal
13.
Univ. odontol ; 31(66): 145-183, ene.-jun. 2012. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-673819

RESUMO

Objetivo: evaluar la literatura científica internacional que reportara técnicas, resultadosclínicos y el proceso de cicatrización ósea de los procedimientos de preservación de alvéolospostexodoncia que utilizaran xenoinjertos, aloinjertos y aquellos que permitieran lacicatrización natural del alvéolo. Métodos: en esta revisión de la literatura, las bases dedatos utilizadas fueron Medline/PubMed, Wiley Online Library, OVID, EBSCO, ScienceDirect yNature.com. Fueron incluidos artículos en inglés, español e italiano de revistas indexadas enbases de datos científicas en línea y presentados por el buscador, al utilizar el término MeSHalveolar ridge preservation. La búsqueda no fue limitada por fecha de publicación y fueronincluidos los artículos disponibles en texto completo. Resultados: en total se analizaron 99publicaciones. A partir de estos estudios se evidencia que ocurre menor pérdida vertical yhorizontal en los sitios preservados comparados con sitios no injertados. Al utilizar aloinjertos,se reportan desde ganancias de 1,3 hasta pérdidas de 1,8 mm en sentido vertical,y al utilizar xenoinjertos, ganancias de 0,7 y pérdidas de 1,0 mm; en sentido horizontal, sereportan pérdidas entre 0,5 y 1,8 mm con aloinjertos y entre 0,5 y 2,1 mm con xenoinjertos.Conclusiones: debido a la diferencia de criterios de inclusión de los estudios analizados, nofue posible realizar una comparación estadística de la evidencia obtenida. Aunque las diferenciasclínicas e histológicas no son significativas, la evidencia analizada reporta mejoresresultados de preservación de alvéolos al utilizar xenoinjertos...


Aim: To evaluate the international scientific literature that refers to techniques, clinicalresults, and bone healing process of alveolar ridge preservation procedures when usingxenografts and allografts and those allowing alveolar healing process. Methods: This literaturereview was performed using the scientific search engines Medline/PubMed, WileyOnline Library, OVID, EBSCO, ScienceDirect and Nature.com. Articles in English, Spanish andItalian published in journals indexed in scientific databases available online were included.The search was carried out with the MeSH term alveolar ridge preservation. The search wasnot restricted by publication date. All the full-text articles available on line were included.Results: 99 journal articles were found. It is evident that less vertical and horizontal boneloss occurs on preserved alveolar ridges than on non-treated sites. On-site treatments withallografts show a results ranging from 1.3 mm vertical bone gain to 1.8 mm vertical boneloss. On-site treatments with xenografts showed a range of response such as 0.7 mm verticalbone gain and 1.0 mm vertical bone loss. It was found that the use of allografts showed ahorizontal bone loss of 0.5-1.8 mm while responses to xenografts were 0.5-2.1 mm. Conclusions:A statistical analysis of the evidence was not possible to carry out due to differencesin inclusion criteria among the studies. Despite the clinical and histological differences werenot significant, the evidence analyzed reports better results of alveolar ridge preservationusing xenografts...


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bucal , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Bucais , Processo Alveolar , Transplante Ósseo
14.
Rev. odonto ciênc ; 26(1): 77-83, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO - Odontologia | ID: lil-588607

RESUMO

Several techniques and materials have been suggested for alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) after dental extraction and before implant placement. This literature review aimed to discuss the histological and clinical aspects of alveolar healing and the ARP procedure after dental extraction and to verify whether it allows dental implant placement (with or without further augmentation). Despite the heterogeneity of the studies, some evidence suggests that ridge preservation procedures are efficient in limiting the postextraction dimensional loss of the ridge and are accompanied by a different degree of bone regeneration, with varied amounts of residual graft material particles.


Várias técnicas e materiais têm sido sugeridos para a preservação do rebordo alveolar (PRA) após a extração dentária e antes da colocação do implante. Esta revisão de literatura buscou discutir os aspectos histológicos e clínicos da cicatrização do alvéolo e do procedimento PRA após a extração dentária e verificar se ele permite a colocação de implante dentário (com ou sem enxerto adicional). Apesar da heterogeneidade dos estudos, há evidência que os procedimentos de preservação do rebordo são eficazes na limitação da perda dimensional do rebordo pós-extração e são acompanhados por um grau diferente de regeneração óssea, com variadas quantidades de partículas residuais dos "materiais de enxerto".


Assuntos
Extração Dentária/efeitos adversos , Implantes Dentários , Regeneração Óssea
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA