Legionella pneumonia: A Case of Fever Prolonged for 10 Days.

Legionnaires' disease is a potentially severe type of pneumonia most often caused by the organism Legionella pneumophila. Exposure to this bacterial pathogen typically happens in the community but may also occur in the hospital setting. This report describes the case of a patient who presented due to 10 days of fever, shortness of breath, and diarrhea, with initial imaging demonstrating multifocal pneumonia. The patient was appropriately started on empiric antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia and admitted to the medicine floor. The patient showed no meaningful improvement in his initial hospital course on empiric antibiotics with continued oxygen requirements. Meanwhile, urine Legionella antigen testing returned positive on hospital day four, and after tailoring antibiotics accordingly, the patient's clinical status improved significantly. This case report highlights the efficacy of broad testing in the initial admission and the need for constant re-evaluation in the context of a patient not improving with appropriate therapy.

Invalidity of JRS atypical pneumonia prediction score in Omicron variant of COVID-19 pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether the Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) atypical pneumonia prediction score can be adapted for the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia due to Omicron BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5 subvariants. METHODS: We enrolled a total of 547 patients with community-acquired COVID-19 pneumonia. Of the COVID-19 pneumonia patients, 198 cases were the Omicron BA.1 subvariant, 127 cases were the Omicron BA.2 subvariant, and 222 cases were the Omicron BA.5 subvariant. Patients with extremely severe pneumonia were excluded and finally 524 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Rates of conformity for the six predictors were identical among the three Omicron groups, and high rates of conformity were observed in the following predictors: adventitious sounds; etiological agent; and a peripheral WBC count. The sensitivities of the diagnosis of atypical pneumonia in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia based on four or more predictors were 49.0% in the BA.1 subvariant group, 58.1% in the BA.2 subvariant group, and 51.0% in the BA.5 subvariant group. The diagnostic sensitivities for Omicron BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5 subvariant groups were 96.6%, 100%, and 96.4% for non-elderly (aged <60 years) patients and 28.4%, 29.7%, and 34.2% for elderly (aged ≥60 years) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In Omicron variant of COVID-19, the JRS atypical pneumonia prediction score is a useful tool for distinguishing between COVID-19 pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia only in patients aged <60 years.

["Crack lung" - atypical bilateral pneumonia]. / "Crack lung" ­ atypische bilaterale Pneumonie.

Inhalation of crack and freebase results in alveolar hemorrhage. In severe courses of the disease, progressive respiratory insufficiency may lead to respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Computed tomography of the thorax reveals bilateral consolidation and ground-glass pattern leaving a subpleural gap. This case report of a 48-year-old male patient highlights the importance of a thorough medical history while ruling out infectious causes.

Is the JRS atypical pneumonia prediction score useful in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia under nursing or healthcare settings?

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 causes frequent outbreaks in elderly care facilities that meet the criteria for nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP). We evaluated whether the Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) atypical pneumonia prediction score could be adapted to the diagnosis of nursing and healthcare acquired COVID-19 (NHA-COVID-19) with pneumonia. METHODS: We analyzed 516 pneumonia patients with NHA-COVID-19 and compared them with 1505 pneumonia patients with community-associated COVID-19 (CA-COVID-19). NHA-COVID-19 patients were divided into six groups; 80 cases had the ancestral strain, 76 cases had the Alfa variant, 30 cases had the Delta variant, 120 cases had the Omicron subvariant BA.1, 53 cases had the Omicron subvariant BA.2, and 157 cases had the Omicron subvariant BA.5. RESULTS: The sensitivities of the diagnosis of atypical pneumonia in patients with NHA-COVID-19 based on four or more predictors were 22.8 % in the ancestral strain group, 32.0 % in the Alfa variant group, 34.5 % in the Delta variant group, 23.1 % in the BA.1 subvariant group, 32.7 % in the BA.2 subvariant group, and 30.4 % in the BA.5 subvariant group. The diagnostic sensitivity for the presumptive diagnosis of atypical pneumonia was significantly lower for NHA-COVID-19 than for CA-COVID-19 (28.2 % vs 64.1 %, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our present study demonstrated that the JRS atypical pneumonia prediction score is not a useful tool in elderly patients even if there is a lot of atypical pneumonia in the NHCAP group. The caution is necessary that JRS atypical pneumonia prediction score was not fully applied to prediction for NHA-COVID-19 pneumonia.

Raoultella planticola Pneumonia: A Rare Causative Organism.

We present a case of Raoultella planticola (R. planticola) infection that resulted in community-acquired pneumonia in an immunocompetent patient with an eight-week history of productive cough. This gram-negative bacterium is typically found in the environment and has the potential to infect humans. Raoultella planticola infections in humans have been recorded in several case reports from throughout the world in recent years, usually affecting immunocompromised patients. Although R. planticola is sensitive to most antibiotic groups, recent studies have revealed an increase in the infrequent acquisition of resistance genes in R. planticola, such as carbapenem resistance, making this pathogen a potential emergent threat. Our patient acquired R. planticola pneumonia in the absence of any underlying risk factors, making this the first case in the UK of R. planticola causing community-acquired pneumonia in an immunocompetent person.

Legionellosis in Poland in 2018-2021.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the epidemiological situation of legionellosis in Poland in 2018-2021 to prior years, taking into account the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020-2021. Material and methods: The assessment is based on national surveillance data published in the annual bulletin "Infectious Diseases and Poisons in Poland" from 2013 to 2021, as well as data from Legionnaires' disease case reports collected and sent to the Department of Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases and Surveillance NIPH NIH - NRI by sanitary and epidemiological stations or submitted to EpiBase. Results: In Poland, both Legionnaires' disease (an acute infection that progresses to pneumonia) and Pontiac fever (a mild, flu-like sickness) are reported. In 2018-2021, a total of 255 cases of legionellosis were registered, including 236 cases of Legionnaires' disease and 19 cases of Pontiac fever. Each year, there was an increase in the number of notifications compared to the annual median number of cases from 2013-2017. The annual incidence rate in 2019 (0.23 per 100,000 population) was the highest since the start of legionellosis case registration in Poland. It declined again during the years of the COVID-19 pandemic. The notifications occurred throughout the country, but the highest notification rate was observed in the western belt of voivodeships. Pomorskie reported the highest incidence, accounting for more than 20% of all registered cases. The median incidence of Legionnaires' disease in men (0.23 per 100,000) was more than twice that of women (0.10), with the highest incidence (0.58) recorded in men 65 years of age or older. All indigenous cases of Legionnaires' disease were sporadic; all but three patients were hospitalized. State Sanitary Inspection reported 26 fatal cases of Legionnaires' disease (mortality = 11%). Twenty-four cases were linked to contaminated water systems in health-care settings, and 21 cases were likely associated with travel abroad. Summary and conclusions: Although the number of notifications has increased in recent years, Legionnaires' disease is still an infrequently diagnosed respiratory infection in Poland, and the reported incidence remains one of the lowest in the entire EU. The most affected demographic group is men aged 65 and older. Improving the early diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease in healthcare settings remains a priority.

A Rare Case of Community-Acquired Pneumonia Only Presenting With Diarrhea, Abdominal Pain, and Fever: A Case Report.

Legionnaires' disease is an atypical pneumonia caused by Legionella pneumophila (L. pneumophila) pneumonia that features slow onset, nonproductive cough, fatigue, headache, sore throat, myalgias, and malaise. It can be difficult to diagnose, as it presents with extrapulmonary symptoms, and delay in treatment can be fatal. Here, we present the case of a previously healthy 32-year-old Caucasian male with Legionnaires disease who only presented to the clinic with abdominal pain and diarrhea. The patient did not have any pulmonary symptoms at the initial presentation. This presentation did not fit the diagnostic tools available for Legionnaires' disease, including a validated clinical prediction rule, which ruled out L. pneumophila infection with a sensitivity of 97% and a negative predictive value of 99.4%. Due to the complaint of abdominal pain, a flat/upright abdominal X-ray was ordered, which includes a chest X-ray. Upon analyzing the chest X-ray, a right lower lobe consolidation was identified, prompting an L. pneumophila urinary test to be added to the lab orders. This case represents the difficulties in diagnosing Legionnaires' disease due to the diverse clinical complexities of presentations, which may solely involve abdominal complaints.

A man with culture sterile cavitating lung lesions: molecular techniques can provide the key to diagnosis.

A 20-year-old male presented to the Emergency Department with pyrexia, dyspnoea, chest pain and haemoptysis. Cavitating lung lesions were noted on chest X-ray and the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit where he was intubated and ventilated. Routine investigations including serial cultures did not provide an aetiological diagnosis. As such, a CT-guided lung biopsy was carried out and 16S rDNA PCR was undertaken on the sample. This identified Fusobacterium necrophorum as the causative organism. The patient was treated for Lemierre's syndrome and successfully discharged from hospital. This case highlights how DNA tissue typing on a lung biopsy sample can be the key to successful diagnosis in an atypical pneumonia and raises the question as to whether this infrequently used approach should be added to forthcoming community acquired pneumonia guidelines.

Computed tomography findings in COVID-19 and atypical pneumonia: a comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: Computed tomography (CT) has an important role in the rapid diagnosis, treatment, and management of lower respiratory tract infections. This study aimed to explore different imaging characteristics between Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and atypical pneumonia (non-COVID-19) on chest CT of patients admitted to the emergency department. METHODOLOGY: CT features of 120 patients with positive Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and 83 patients with negative SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR but positive respiratory tract sample test results for other respiratory pathogens were retrospectively evaluated, findings were recorded and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared to non-COVID-19, COVID-19 patients were more likely to have a peripheral (60.5% vs. 23.8%, p < 0.001) and bilateral distribution (72.3% vs. 41.3%, p < 0.001), patchy consolidations (45% vs. 28.9%, p = 0.021), ground glass opacity (GGO) (94.2% vs. 83.1%, p = 0.011), crazy paving patterns (55% vs. 31.3%, p < 0.001); but less likely to have centrilobular nodules (15% vs. 62.7%, p < 0.001), pleural effusion (3.3% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.032), multifocal consolidations (7.5% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.003), and random distribution (1.7% vs. 46.3%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences between the CT patterns of patients with COVID-19 and other atypical pneumonia. The presence of patchy consolidations, GGO, crazy paving patterns with typical peripheral, bilateral distribution, and absence of centrilobular nodules, pleural effusion, and multifocal consolidations may help to differentiate COVID-19 from atypical pneumonia.

A 40-Year-Old Female With Mycobacterium abscessus Successfully Treated With a Dual Beta-Lactam Combination.

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections are difficult to treat conditions, specially Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab) lung disease. The most recent ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA clinical practice guidelines (2020) recommend regimens of multiple intravenous (IV) and oral antibiotics. Recent in vitro studies on M. abscessus show that the combination of two beta-lactam antibiotics, as well as select beta-lactamase inhibitors, provides significant synergy in its treatment. We present the first in vivo case of the successful treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus with imipenem and amoxicillin in addition to macrolides, clofazimine, and inhaled liposomal amikacin.

Identificación de genotipos de Chlamydia trachomatis en neonatos con distrés respiratorio / Identification of Chlamydia trachomatis genotypes in newborns with respiratory distress

Introducción: Cada año se notifican ciento treinta millones de infecciones por Chlamydia trachomatis en todo el mundo. Diecinueve serotipos de este patógeno pueden causar infecciones en mujeres embarazadas y recién nacidos. En México se desconoce la distribución de estos genotipos en recién nacidos con infecciones respiratorias. Material y métodos: Se analizaron mil sesenta y dos muestras de lavado bronquial de neonatos con síndrome de dificultad respiratoria para detección de infección por clamidia. El diagnóstico de clamidia se realizó mediante la detección de plásmidos con un ensayo PCR interno y los genotipos se identificaron mediante un ensayo PCR-RFLP del gen ompA. Resultados: El genotipado de 40 cepas identificó a 14 como I/Ia (35%), 13 como E (32,5%), 7 como D (17,5%), 5 como F (12,5%) y 1 como L2 (2,5%). El análisis de riesgo relativo mostró que el genotipo D se asoció con sepsis neonatal (RR=5,83; IC 95%: 1,51-25,985; p <0,02), mientras que el genotipo I/Ia mostró asociación significativa con madres que desarrollaron corioamnionitis (2,8; IC 95%: 1,4-5,5; p <0,05). Conclusiones: Si bien los genotipos I/Ia y E de Chlamydia trachomatis fueron la causa más frecuente de infección respiratoria en neonatos mexicanos, el 80% de los genotipos F produjeron este padecimiento. En cambio, el genotipo D se asoció con el desarrollo de sepsis neonatal y el genotipo I/Ia con corioamnionitis. (AU)

Introduction: One hundred thirty million Chlamydia trachomatis infections are reported worldwide each year. Nineteen serotypes of this pathogen can cause infection in pregnant women and neonates. The distribution of these genotypes in newborns with respiratory infections in Mexico is unknown. Material and methods: We tested 1062 bronchial lavage samples from neonates with respiratory distress syndrome for Chlamydia infection. The diagnosis of Chlamydia was made by plasmid detection with an in-house PCR assay, and genotypes were identified using a PCR-RFLP assay for the ompA gene. Results: The genotyping of 40 strains identified 14 as I/Ia (35%), 13 as E (32.5%), 7 as D (17.5%), 5 as F (12.5%), and 1 as L2 (2.5%). The relative risk analysis showed that genotype D was associated with neonatal sepsis (RR, 5.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-25.985; P<.02), while the I/Ia genotype was significantly associated with chorioamnionitis in the mother (2.8; 95% CI, 1.4–5.5; P<.05). Conclusions: Although Chlamydia trachomatis genotypes I/Ia and E of were the strains involved most frequently in respiratory infections in Mexican neonates, 80% of patients with genotype F developed respiratory disease. In contrast, genotype D was associated with neonatal sepsis, and genotype I/Ia with chorioamnionitis. (AU)

Enfermedad del legionario en Argentina: evolución de la estrategia diagnóstica en el laboratorio / Legionnaires' disease in Argentina: Evolution of the laboratory diagnostic strategy

Resumen La enfermedad del legionario (EL) es una neumonía aguda grave, que ocurre espo-rádicamente o como epidemias, y que, generalmente, requiere hospitalización. El objetivo deeste trabajo fue describir la experiencia en el abordaje diagnóstico de laboratorio de la ELen Argentina durante el período 2016-2021. Se analizaron 168 especímenes clínicos correspondientes a 93 casos de neumonía con sospecha de EL. Las pruebas de laboratorio incluyeron ladeterminación del antígeno soluble de Legionella pneumophila serogrupo 1 en orina, la detec-ción de ADN de Legionella spp. en secreciones respiratorias bajas, por métodos moleculares convencionales y comerciales de tipo sindrómico, y el cultivo en medio selectivo. Se confirmó EL en 12 pacientes. El antígeno urinario confirmó el diagnóstico de 8 de ellos. Se recuperó L. pneumophila mediante el cultivo del material respiratorio de 6 pacientes que correspondieron a casos de neumonía asociada a cuidados de la salud y que fueron previamente diagnosticados por el método molecular comercial. La mitad de ellos no presentó antigenuria detectable. En un único paciente no hubo antigenuria detectable ni recuperación de Legionella en cultivo, y la confirmación de EL se basó en la detección de ADN de Legionella spp. por PCR en secreción respiratoria y el vínculo epidemiológico con otro caso de EL confirmado por cultivo. La detección del antígeno urinario es la prueba diagnóstica de primera línea. Sin embargo, la incorporación de métodos moleculares complementarios ha demostrado evitar falsos negativos y contribuir a un mejor conocimiento de la verdadera incidencia de la enfermedad.

Abstract Legionnaires' disease (LD) is severe acute pneumonia that occurs in sporadic or epidemic form, and generally requires hospitalizaron. The objective of this work was to describe the experience in the LD laboratory diagnostic approach in Argentina during the period 2016-2021. The laboratory analyzed 168 clinical specimens from 93 cases of suspected LD pneu-monia. Laboratory tests included the detection of the soluble antigen of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 in urine sample, detection of DNA of Legionella spp. in lower respiratory secre-tions by conventional and commercial molecular methods and isolation in selective medium. LD was confirmed in 12 patients. The urinary antigen allowed the diagnosis for 8 patients. L. pneumophila was isolated from the respiratory material of 6 patients suffering from health care-associated pneumonia, who had been previously diagnosed using the commercial molecular method. Fifty percent of these cases did not show detectable urinary antigen. A single patient did not shows neither detectable antigenuria nor isolation of Legionella from the respiratory sample and was diagnosed as a confirmed case of LD by the detection of DNA of Legionella spp. by PCR directly from the respiratory secretion and the epidemiological link with another case of confirmed LD by culture. Urinary antigen detection is the first-line diagnostic test. However, the incorporation of complementary molecular methods has proved to avoid false negatives and contributed to a better understanding of the true incidence of the disease.

Validation of JRS atypical pneumonia score in patients with community-acquired Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia.

INTRODUCTION: The Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) atypical pneumonia score is a useful tool for the rapid presumptive diagnosis of atypical pneumonia. We investigated the clinical features of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) due to Chlamydia psittaci and validated the JRS atypical pneumonia score in patients with C. psittaci CAP. METHODS: This study was conducted at 30 institutions and assessed a total of 72 sporadic cases with C. psittaci CAP, 412 cases with Mycoplasma pneumoniae CAP, and 576 cases with Streptococcus pneumoniae CAP. RESULTS: Sixty-two of 72 patients with C. psittaci CAP had a history of avian exposure. Among the six parameters of the JRS score, matching rates of four parameters were significantly lower in the C. psittaci CAP than the M. pneumoniae CAP in the following parameters: age <60 years, no or minor comorbid illness, stubborn or paroxysmal cough, and absence of chest adventitious sounds. The sensitivity of the diagnosis of atypical pneumonia in patients with C. psittaci CAP was significantly lower than the M. pneumoniae CAP (65.3% and 87.4%, p < 0.0001). When the diagnostic sensitivity was analyzed for different ages, the diagnostic sensitivities for the C. psittaci CAP were 90.5% for non-elderly patients and 30.0% for elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: The JRS atypical pneumonia score is a useful tool for distinguishing between C. psittaci CAP and bacterial CAP in patients aged <60 years, but not in patients aged ≥60 years. A history of avian exposure in middle-aged patients with normal white blood cell count may be suggestive of C. psittaci pneumonia.

Identification of Chlamydia trachomatis genotypes in newborns with respiratory distress.

INTRODUCTION: One hundred thirty million Chlamydia trachomatis infections are reported worldwide each year. Nineteen serotypes of this pathogen can cause infection in pregnant women and neonates. The distribution of these genotypes in newborns with respiratory infections in Mexico is unknown. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We tested 1062 bronchial lavage samples from neonates with respiratory distress syndrome for Chlamydia infection. The diagnosis of Chlamydia was made by plasmid detection with an in-house PCR assay, and genotypes were identified using a PCR-RFLP assay for the ompA gene. RESULTS: The genotyping of 40 strains identified 14 as I/Ia (35%), 13 as E (32.5%), 7 as D (17.5%), 5 as F (12.5%), and 1 as L2 (2.5%). The relative risk analysis showed that genotype D was associated with neonatal sepsis (RR, 5.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-25.985; P < .02), while the I/Ia genotype was significantly associated with chorioamnionitis in the mother (2.8; 95% CI, 1.4-5.5; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Although C. trachomatis genotypes I/Ia and E of were the strains involved most frequently in respiratory infections in Mexican neonates, 80% of patients with genotype F developed respiratory disease. In contrast, genotype D was associated with neonatal sepsis, and genotype I/Ia with chorioamnionitis.

Septic Shock and Bacteremia Secondary to Herbaspirillum huttiense: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

The Herbaspirillum species are gram-negative bacteria that inhabit soil and water. Infections caused by this pathogen are an uncommon clinical entity. We describe a rare case of septic shock and bacteremia caused by Herbaspirillum huttiense in an immunocompetent adult female. The patient, a 59-year-old female, presented to the hospital with circulatory shock, fever, chills, and cough. Chest x-ray revealed right lower lobe lung consolidation consistent with pneumonia, and blood cultures with a positive concerning gram-negative curved rod which was later identified as H. huttiense. The patient was treated in the ICU for three days with cefepime and vasoactive agents. After improvement and an additional seven days of hospitalization, the patient was discharged home with a five-day course of oral levofloxacin. Although our patient responded well to cefepime and levofloxacin, meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam were found to be the most commonly used and the most effective antibiotics to treat H. huttiense infections in other reported cases. This is amongst the few reported cases of H. huttiense bacteremia in an immunocompetent individual with pneumonia.

Atrio-Ventricular Block by Legionella Disease.

Although Legionnaires' disease mainly affects the lungs, it can also present with other systemic involvement, including rare cardiac manifestations. Recognised presentations are endocarditis, myocarditis, pericarditis, and pericardial effusion. A 72-year-old British man presented with a six-day history of dry cough and a four-day history of fever during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. His electrocardiogram showed Mobitz type II atrio-ventricular block. Although all the cultures were negative, the chest X-ray demonstrated COVID-19 infection-like features. With high clinical suspicions and chest X-ray features, the polymerase chain reaction of the COVID tests was repeated three times and all were negative. He had a positive urinary Legionella antigen, and his bradycardia and heart block improved after treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and clarithromycin. As the electrocardiogram showed Mobitz type II, a permanent pacemaker was implanted. The follow-up pacemaker check showed that he still required active pacing.

[Legionnaires' disease in Argentina: Evolution of the laboratory diagnostic strategy]. / Enfermedad del legionario en Argentina: evolución de la estrategia diagnóstica en el laboratorio.

Legionnaires' disease (LD) is severe acute pneumonia that occurs in sporadic or epidemic form, and generally requires hospitalization. The objective of this work was to describe the experience in the LD laboratory diagnostic approach in Argentina during the period 2016-2021. The laboratory analyzed 168 clinical specimens from 93 cases of suspected LD pneumonia. Laboratory tests included the detection of the soluble antigen of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 in urine sample, detection of DNA of Legionella spp. in lower respiratory secretions by conventional and commercial molecular methods and isolation in selective medium. LD was confirmed in 12 patients. The urinary antigen allowed the diagnosis for 8 patients. L. pneumophila was isolated from the respiratory material of 6 patients suffering from health care-associated pneumonia, who had been previously diagnosed using the commercial molecular method. Fifty percent of these cases did not show detectable urinary antigen. A single patient did not shows neither detectable antigenuria nor isolation of Legionella from the respiratory sample and was diagnosed as a confirmed case of LD by the detection of DNA of Legionella spp. by PCR directly from the respiratory secretion and the epidemiological link with another case of confirmed LD by culture. Urinary antigen detection is the first-line diagnostic test. However, the incorporation of complementary molecular methods has proved to avoid false negatives and contributed to a better understanding of the true incidence of the disease.