Experience of the temporary discharge from the inpatient palliative care unit: A nationwide post-bereavement survey for end-of-life cancer patients.

Objective: Inpatient palliative care units (PCUs) have two roles: place of death and symptom control. In case of symptom control, most patients whose distressing symptoms could be relieved would be temporarily discharged back home. However, the experience of the patient and their family during temporary discharge is unclear. Methods: This study is a part of the Japan HOspice and Palliative Care Evaluation Study 3, a nationwide cross-sectional post-bereavement survey. We sent questionnaires to bereaved relatives of cancer patients who died in PCUs in 2018. Results: Among 968 questionnaires sent, 571 questionnaires were analyzed (59%). Sixteen percent of patients experienced temporary discharge from PCUs. Seventy-two percent of bereaved family members reported that patients said "I am happy to be discharged home." Overall, 22%-37% of participants reported improvement in the patient's condition after discharge. The caregiver's recognition of better patient's quality of life at home and the doctor's assurance of re-hospitalization, if necessary, were significantly associated with positive experience. Conclusions: Bereaved family members recognized temporal discharge as positive experiences for patients and families. Appropriate home palliative care and discharge planning would contribute to positive experience after discharge.

Comparison of the quality of death between primary malignant brain tumor patients and other cancer patients: results from a nationwide bereavement survey in Japan.

PURPOSE: No studies have investigated the association between malignant brain tumor and the quality of dying, which is an important outcome in end-of-life care. This study aimed to clarify whether the quality of dying and related factors in patients with malignant brain tumor differ from those in patients with other malignant diseases. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of data collected by two nationwide, multicenter, bereavement surveys of palliative care units in Japan. This analysis included 14,171 bereaved family members (160 patients with malignant brain tumors). The quality of dying was examined using the good death inventory (GDI), a validated tool widely used in palliative care settings. RESULTS: Patients with malignant brain tumors were younger (p < 0.0001) and had a longer palliative care unit stay during their end-of-life (p < 0.0001) than others. The total GDI score was significantly lower in patients with malignant brain tumors than others (p < 0.0001). Five GDI items were significantly lower in the malignant brain tumor group than other cancer group: "Being able to stay in one's favorite place" (p = 0.03); "Trusting the physician" (p = 0.003); "Not being a burden to others" (p = 0.01); "Being independent in daily activities" (p = 0.01); and "Feeling that one's life is worth living" (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that the quality of dying of patients with malignant brain tumors was lower compared to other cancers, suggesting the need to review care for patients with malignant brain tumors based on their characteristics.

"Saying goodbye all alone with no close support was difficult"- Dying during the COVID-19 pandemic: an online survey among bereaved relatives about end-of-life care for patients with or without SARS-CoV2 infection.

BACKGROUND: During the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, protection measures, as well as visiting restrictions, had a severe impact on seriously ill and dying patients and their relatives. The study aims to describe the experiences of bereaved relatives of patients who died during the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, regardless of whether patients were infected with SARS-CoV2 or not. As part of this, experiences related to patients' end-of-life care, saying goodbye, visiting restrictions and communication with the healthcare team were assessed. METHODS: An open observational post-bereavement online survey with free text options was conducted with 81 bereaved relatives from people who died during the pandemic in Germany, with and without SARS-CoV2 diagnosis. RESULTS: 67/81 of the bereaved relatives were female, with a mean age of 57.2 years. 50/81 decedents were women, with a mean age of 82.4 years. The main underlying diseases causing death were cardiovascular diseases or cancer. Only 7/81 of the patients were infected with SARS-CoV2. 58/81 of the relatives felt burdened by the visiting restrictions and 60/81 suffered from pandemic-related stress. 10 of the patients died alone due to visiting restrictions. The burden for relatives in the hospital setting was higher compared to relatives of patients who died at home. 45/81 and 44/81 relatives respectively reported that physicians and nurses had time to discuss the patient's condition. Nevertheless, relatives reported a lack of proactive communication from the healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Visits of relatives play a major role in the care of the dying and have an impact on the bereavement of relatives. Visits must be facilitated, allowing physical contact. Additionally, virtual contact with the patients and open, empathetic communication on the part of healthcare professionals is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00023552).

Physician's Communication in Code Status Discussions for Terminally Ill Cancer Patients in Inpatient Hospice/Palliative Care Units in Japan: A Nationwide Post-Bereavement Survey.

CONTEXT: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is one of the most important end-of-life care decisions. However, the experience of bereaved families during code status discussions is not well documented. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to describe the degree of emotional distress of bereaved families when discussing code status, identify their perceived areas for improvement and determine associated factors. METHODS: This study is part of a nationwide post-bereavement survey, the Japan Hospice and Palliative care Evaluation 3 (J-HOPE3) study. Questionnaires were sent to the relatives of cancer patients who had died in palliative care units in Japan in 2014. RESULTS: From an analysis of 338 questionnaires, 37% of families reported high emotional distress during code status discussions and 32% reported a need for improvement. Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed the following were associated with high-level distress: the family had hoped for the miraculous and spontaneous recovery of the patient (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-4.43, P = 0.0049), the family felt they could not voice their opinion about Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR 2.07, CI 1.12-3.81, P = 0.02), or the physician failed to adapt the explanation to the family's preparation level (OR 0.36, CI 0.18-0.68, P = 0.0015). Factors identified for improvement were: holding discussions in a relaxing atmosphere conducive to questioning (OR 0.36, CI 0.16-0.80, P = 0.012), and ensuring the physician adapted the explanation to the family's preparation level (OR 0.47, CI 0.23-0.96, P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: We recommend the development of educational programs for code status discussions to improve the experience of bereaved family members.

The distress and benefit to bereaved family members of participating in a post-bereavement survey.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have simultaneously collected quantitative data regarding the positive and negative effects of participating in post-bereavement surveys. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional postal questionnaire survey in October 2013. Potential participants were caregivers for family members who had died in four inpatient palliative care units, two home hospices, and a general hospital. We collected opinions regarding the distress and benefit of completing a post-bereavement survey. After collecting data, we provided feedback to participating institutions in the form of study results and de-identified open-ended comments. RESULTS: Of 692 potential participants, 596 were sent questionnaires; 393 returned questionnaires were valid and analyzed. Of the respondents, 62% reported being distressed by completing the questionnaire. Female participants and those who were mentally ill during the caregiving period reported more distress. However, 86% of respondents reported they found the questionnaire beneficial. Better quality of end-of-life care and respondent depression were associated with more benefit. Major benefits were: contributing to the development of end-of-life care as a family (63%); expressing gratitude to the hospital and medical staff (60%); and looking back and reflecting on the end-of-life period (40%). Feeling benefit was not correlated with feeling distressed (P = -0.02). CONCLUSION: In this large-scale study on the effects of post-bereavement surveys in Japan, many bereaved family members reported that completing the survey was beneficial. In addition to possibly having feelings of distress, post-bereavement surveys might also be beneficial to end-of-life care facilities.

How well do we currently care for our dying patients in acute hospitals: the views of the bereaved relatives?

BACKGROUND: The National Care of the Dying Audit-Hospitals (NCDAH) is used as a method to evaluate care for dying patients in England. An additional component to the 2013/2014 audit was the Local Survey of Bereaved Relatives Views using the 'Care Of the Dying Evaluation' (CODE) questionnaire. AIM: Within the context of the NCDAH audit, to evaluate quality of care provided to dying patients and their families in acute hospitals from the perspective of bereaved relatives. DESIGN: Postbereavement survey to bereaved relatives. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: For acute hospitals wishing to participate, consecutive 'expected' adult deaths occurring between 1 May and 30 June 2013 were identified and the CODE questionnaire was sent to the next-of-kin. RESULTS: From 3414 eligible next-of-kin, 95 (2.8%) were excluded due to being involved in a complaint procedure and 1006 (29.5%) due to insufficient next-of-kin details. From the remaining 2313 potential participants, 858 returned a completed CODE questionnaire (37.1% response rate). Generally, symptoms were perceived to be well controlled with 769 (91%) participants reporting that either no pain was present or only there 'some of the time'. Unmet information needs, however, was a recognised area for improvement, for example, 230 (29%) reporting having a discussion about hydration would have been beneficial. CONCLUSIONS: Adopting a postbereavement survey to NCDAH appears to be feasible, acceptable and a valuable addition. On the whole, the majority of participants reported good or excellent care. A small but significant minority, however, perceived poor quality of patient care with clear and timely communication urgently needed.

Nationwide Survey on Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in Cancer Patients Who Died at Palliative Care Units in Japan: Prevalence of CAM and Family Experience

<p>The aim of this study was to understand the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in cancer patients in Japan. This study was part of the Japan Hospice and Palliative care Evaluation 2016 (J-HOPE2016) Study. A multicenter questionnaire survey was conducted on a sample of bereaved family members of cancer patients who died at palliative care units. Data suggest that 54% of cancer patients use CAM. In comparison with a previous study in 2005 in Japan, categories of CAM vary widely; CAM previously included supplements mostly, but now exercise and mind and body therapy are also used. Most cancer patients use CAM without any harmful influence on their household economy and cancer treatment; however, in some patients, CAM incurs a large expense and a delay in starting cancer treatment. Therefore, it is important for medical staff and patients to have an opportunity to discuss CAM use. Multiple logistic regression analysis shows that CAM use is significantly associated with younger patients and highly educated families; moreover, there is a possibility that family members who use CAM have a high level of psychological distress. We must pay attention to the physical and the psychological aspects of cancer patients who use CAM and their families. Further studies are needed to investigate the use of each category of CAM, and to understand patients who use CAM and who die at home or in hospitals other than palliative care units.</p>

Why Patients in Institutions with Religious Background Achieve ‘Good Death’ ? : Findings from National Bereavement Survey of 127 Hospice and Palliative Care Units

<p>Previous study reported that patients of institutions with religious background are more likely to achieve ‘good death’ than patients in non-religious institutions, although the reasons are unclear. This study aims to examine the reasons for this difference using a national survey of religious and non-religious institutions. We sent a self-administered questionnaire to 10,715 bereaved family caregiver and 133 hospice and palliative care units which cared for their family members prior to death. The questionnaire for bereaved families included the Good Death Inventory (GDI). The questionnaire for institutions included their religious affiliation and their subjective and objective provided care. In total, 7,286 bereaved families (68%) and 127 (95%) institutions including 23 religious end-of-life care institutions responded. We performed t-test and χ-square test to compare the GDI scores and provided care for religious and non-religious end-of-life care institutions. The GDI total score was significantly higher (p=0.01) in religious institutions compared to non-religious institutions. Items such as “providing many activities for seasonal events to the patients”, “providing more bereavement care”, “having facilities to practice their religion”, and “having regular visits from religious leaders”, were all reported more frequently in the religious institutions, and significantly associated with achievement of ‘good death’ (p<0.05 for all items). This study suggests that factors for achieving ‘good death’ are not only limited to providing religious care but also providing other forms of care, services, and activities that can enhance the patients’ ‘good death’.</p>

Practical Use of Feedback Report of Nationwide Bereavement Survey in Participated Institutions

<p>Aims: The aim of this study was to clarify practical use of feedback report in each institution participated the nationwide bereavement survey (J-HOPE3). Methods: After a nationwide bereavement survey (J-HOPE3) conducted in 2014, we sent a feedback report to each participated institution (20 general wards, 133 inpatient palliative care units, and 22 home hospice services). The feedback report included the results from quality of care, bereaved family’s mental status, and free comments from the participant of their own institution. We sent a questionnaire 4 month following to the feedback report for all institutions regarding the practical use of results from the feedback report. Results: The analysis included 129 (response rate 74%) returned questionnaires. The institutions that they passed around the report was 90%, discussed about their results at a staff meeting was 54%, and reported the results to manager/chief of the institution was 65%. Around 80% of the institutions responded positively to receive the feedback report of their own institution such as “It was good that they could understand the strengths and weakness of their own institutions” which reported that they worked on to improve care were 48%. Conclusions: Current study had shown data about practical use of the feedback report of bereavement study. It is important to feedback the results and encourage the institution to make use of the results in their daily practice, especially to discuss the results in staff meetings.</p>

Changes in Relatives' Perspectives on Quality of Death, Quality of Care, Pain Relief, and Caregiving Burden Before and After a Region-Based Palliative Care Intervention.

CONTEXT: A region-based palliative care intervention (Outreach Palliative Care Trial of Integrated Regional Model Study) increased home death, access to specialist palliative care, quality of care, and quality of death and dying. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine changes in palliative care outcomes in different care settings (hospitals, palliative care units, and home) and obtain insights into how to improve region-level palliative care. METHODS: The intervention program was implemented from April 2008 to March 2011. Two bereavement surveys were conducted before and after intervention involving 4228 family caregivers of deceased cancer patients. Family-perceived quality of care (range 1-6), quality of death and dying (1-7), pain relief (1-7), and caregiver burden (1-7) were measured. RESULTS: Response rates were 69% (preintervention) and 66% (postintervention), respectively. Family-perceived quality of care (adjusted mean 4.89, 95% CI 4.54-5.23) and quality of death and dying (4.96, 4.72-5.20) at home were the highest and sustained throughout the study. Palliative care units were at the intermediate level between home and hospitals. In hospitals, both quality of care and quality of death and dying were low at baseline but significantly improved after intervention (quality of care: 4.24, 4.13-4.34 to 4.43, 4.31-4.54, P = 0.002; quality of death and dying: 4.22, 4.09-4.36 to 4.36, 4.22-4.50, P = 0.012). Caregiver burden did not significantly increase after intervention, regardless of place of death. CONCLUSIONS: The dual strategies of transition of place of death to home and improving quality of care in hospitals should be recognized as important targets for improving region-level palliative care.

Assessing the quality of care for dying patients from the bereaved relatives' perspective: further validation of "Evaluating care and health outcomes--for the dying".

CONTEXT: Evaluating Care and Health Outcomes-for the Dying (ECHO-D) is a post-bereavement questionnaire that assesses quality of care for the dying and is linked with the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient (LCP). OBJECTIVES: To further assess the validity and reliability of the ECHO-D, namely the construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of key composite scales. METHODS: Self-completion questionnaires were mailed to 778 next-of-kin of consecutive deceased patients who had died an "expected" cancer death in a hospice or acute tertiary hospital. For those willing to complete ECHO-D for a second time, another copy was sent a month later. Maximum likelihood factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha test were conducted for four key composite scales. Test-retest reliability was assessed using percentage agreement, Kappa statistic, and Spearman's correlation coefficient (ordinal data). Comparisons between hospice and hospital groups were conducted using one-way between-groups analysis of variance. RESULTS: Following exclusions (n = 52), 255 of 726 next-of-kin agreed to participate (35.2% response rate). Maximum likelihood factor analysis showed a single factor for three of the scales, and all had good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha >0.78). Barring two questions, all showed good or moderate stability over time. Overall, hospice participants reported the best quality of care, and hospital participants, where care was not supported by the LCP, reported the worst quality of care. CONCLUSION: These findings support ECHO-D as a valid and reliable instrument to assess quality of care for the dying and assess the effectiveness of interventions such as the LCP.