In-hospital systolic blood pressure lowering patterns and risk of rehospitalization for angina in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease.

This study aimed to examine the association between in-hospital systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering patterns and rehospitalization for angina in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease (HT-CAD). This prospective cohort study was conducted in Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. We included 730 patients with HT-CAD, who were hospitalized between August 2020 and September 2022. The in-hospital SBP lowering patterns were identified according to SBP level at admission, SBP level at discharge, and the difference between them: normal-stable SBP, more-intensive SBP reduction, less-intensive SBP reduction, and non-reduced SBP. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the risk of rehospitalization for angina according to SBP lowering patterns. We identified 121 cases of rehospitalization for angina in a median follow-up of 28.2 months. Patients with more-intensive SBP reduction had the lowest incidence rate of rehospitalization for angina, followed by those with normal-stable SBP, less-intensive SBP reduction, and non-reduced SBP. After adjusting for potential confounders, we found that compared with patients with more-intensive SBP reduction, the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of rehospitalization for angina were 1.35 (0.78-2.35) for patients with normal-stable SBP, 2.17 (1.14-4.14) for patients with less-intensive SBP reduction, and 2.99 (1.57-5.68) for patients with non-reduced SBP. This association was more pronounced in patients with multi-vessel stenosis than in patients with single-vessel stenosis. In conclusion, in-hospital SBP lowering patterns were associated with risk of rehospitalization for angina. These results highlighted the importance of intensive in-hospital SBP control in patients with HT-CAD.

Factors Related to Nonachievement of Intensive Blood Pressure-Lowering Target in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is one of the most disabling forms of stroke. Intensive lowering of blood pressure (BP) has been postulated as one of the therapies that can improve functional outcomes. However, this intensive reduction is not always achieved. We aimed to study the differences between patients in whom intensive BP lowering was achieved during the first 24 h after admission and those in whom this BP lowering was not possible. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical charts to obtain information on BP management during the first 24 h. Our protocol establishes that intensive BP lowering below 140 mm Hg of systolic BP should be pursued. RESULTS: In total, 210 patients were included. In 107 (51.0%), an intensive target BP was not achieved. This group of patients had higher initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores and poorer clinical evolution, with more early neurological deterioration, higher requirements for antihypertensive treatment, higher necessity for surgical evacuation, more withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, and higher mortality at 3 months (all p < 0.05). In the multivariable analysis, high BP levels at admission remained related to the nonachievement of BP-lowering goals, despite a higher administration of antihypertensive medications. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the intensive BP-lowering goal was not achieved in about half of the patients with ICH, despite the high proportion of patients receiving antihypertensive medications. This group of patients had poorer outcomes and higher mortality rates at 3 months. High BP at presentation may be difficult to control in patients with high clinical severity of ICH despite aggressive management.

Plasma renin activity as a marker for predicting the antihypertensive effect of switching to sacubitril/valsartan in treated hypertensive patients: Usefulness in daily clinical practice.

The authors investigated the antihypertensive effect of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) when switching from other drugs and assessed whether brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or plasma renin activity (PRA) before drug switching was a predictor of blood pressure lowering after switching to Sac/Val. In 92 patients with treated hypertension, clinic blood pressure, plasma BNP, and PRA were examined before and after switching to Sac/Val. Clinic systolic and diastolic blood pressures significantly decreased after drug switching to Sac/Val (p < .0001, respectively). The level before drug switching of BNP had no correlation with the change in systolic blood pressure (Δ-SBP) before and after switching to Sac/Val, but that of PRA was significantly correlated with Δ-SBP (r = .3807, p = .0002). A multiple regression analysis revealed that PRA before drug switching was an independent determinant of Δ-SBP. Our findings suggest that low PRA may become a useful marker to predict the antihypertensive effect of switching to Sac/Val in treated hypertensive patients.

Influence of multiple risk factor control level on cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients.

OBJECTIVE: The relationship between the level of baseline risk factor control and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with blood pressure intervention is not well understood. It is also unclear whether the level of baseline risk factor control is persuasively associated with cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with blood pressure lowering strategy. METHOD: We performed an analysis of the Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial. Participants without complete baseline risk factor data were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and estimate association between risk factor control levels (≥6, 5, 4, and ≤ 3) and cardiovascular outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 8337 participants were involved in the analysis and the median follow-up period was 3.19 years. Each additional risk factor uncontrolled was associated with a 24% higher cardiovascular risk (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11-1.37). Compared with participants with optimal risk factor control, those with ≤ 3 factors control exhibited 95% higher cardiovascular risk (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.37-2.77). The corresponding protective effects of multiple risk factor modification were not influenced by intensive or standard antihypertensive treatment (P for interaction = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: A stepwise association was observed between cardiovascular risk and the number of risk factor control in hypertensive patients. The more risk factor was modified, the less cardiovascular risk was observed, irrespective of different blood pressure lowering strategies. Comprehensive risk factor control strategies are warranted to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in hypertensive patients. Trial registration STEP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03015311. Registered 2 January 2017.

Relationships between sodium, fats and carbohydrates on blood pressure, cholesterol and HbA1c: an umbrella review of systematic reviews.

Background: The relationship between nutrition and health is complex and the evidence to describe it broad and diffuse. This review brings together evidence for the effect of nutrients on cardiometabolic risk factors. Methods: An umbrella review identified systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses estimating the effects of fats, carbohydrates and sodium on blood pressure, cholesterol and haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Science Citation Index were search through 26 May 2020, with supplementary searches of grey literature and websites. English language systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included that assessed the effect of sodium, carbohydrates or fat on blood pressure, cholesterol and HbA1c. Reviews were purposively selected using a sampling framework matrix. The quality of evidence was assessed with A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) checklist, evidence synthesised in a narrative review and causal pathways diagram. Results: Forty-three systematic reviews were included. Blood pressure was significantly associated with sodium, fibre and fat. Sodium, fats and carbohydrates were significantly associated with cholesterol. Monounsaturated fat, fibre and sugars were associated with HbA1c. Conclusion: Multiple relationships between nutrients and cardiometabolic risk factors were identified and summarised in an accessible way for public health researchers. The review identifies associations, inconsistencies and gaps in evidence linking nutrition to cardiometabolic health.

Electrocardiographic tracking of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension: incidence and prognostic outcomes from the SPRINT trial.

BACKGROUND: This study explores the impact of intensive blood pressure (BP) control on left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) incidence and evaluates the prognostic implications of LVH status (pre-existing/new-onset/persistent/regression) using Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) Electrocardiogram Data. METHODS: Poisson regression was used to assess new-onset LVH and LVH regression rates. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models determined the risk of adverse cardiovascular events (ACE), a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), non-MI acute coronary syndrome, stroke, heart failure, or cardiovascular death, alongside safety adverse events. RESULTS: In 8,016 participants, intensive BP control significantly reduced new-onset LVH (8.27 vs. 14.79 per 1000-person years; adjusted p<0.001) and increased LVH regression (14.89 vs. 11.89 per 1000-person years; adjusted p<0.001). Elevated ACE risk was notable in participants with pre-existing LVH [adjusted HR: 1.94 (95% CI: 1.25-2.99); p = 0.003], new-onset LVH [adjusted 1.74 (95% CI: 1.16-2.60); p = 0.007], and persistent LVH[adjusted HR: 1.96 (95% CI: 1.11-3.46); p = 0.020], compared to those without LVH. Intriguingly, LVH regression attenuated this risk increment [adjusted HR: 1.57 (95% CI: 0.98-2.53); p = 0.062]. Achieving a BP target of < 120/80 mmHg nullified the increased ACE risk in those with pre-existing LVH. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive BP control is instrumental in both reducing the emergence of LVH and fostering its regression. Pre-existing, new-onset LVH and persistent LV remain a predictor of adverse cardiovascular prognosis, whereas LVH regression and achieving on-treatment BP < 120/80 mmHg in pre-existing LVH individuals may further mitigate residual cardiovascular risk. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: ClinicalTrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT01206062.

Impact of baseline cardiovascular risk on the outcomes of intensive blood pressure intervention: a post hoc analysis of the China rural hypertension control project.

BACKGROUND: The 2018/2023 ESC/ESH Guidelines underlined a gap how baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk predicted blood pressure (BP) lowering benefits. Further, 2017 ACC/AHA Guideline and 2021 WHO Guideline recommended implementation studies about intensive BP control. Now, to bridge these guideline gaps, we conducted a post hoc analysis to validate whether the baseline CVD risk influences the effectiveness of the intensive BP control strategy, which was designed by China Rural Hypertension Control Project (CRHCP). METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of CRHCP, among which participants were enrolled except those having CVD history, over 80 years old, or missing data. Subjects were stratified into quartiles by baseline estimated CVD risk and then grouped into intervention and usual care group according to original assignment in CRHCP. Participants in the intervention group received an integrated, multi-faceted treatment strategy, executed by trained non-physician community health-care providers, aiming to achieve a BP target of < 130/80 mmHg. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratios of outcomes for intervention in each quartile, while interaction effect between intervention and estimated CVD risk quartiles was additionally assessed. The primary outcome comprised myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or CVD deaths. RESULTS: Significant lower rates of primary outcomes for intervention group compared with usual care for each estimated CVD risk quartile were reported. The hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) in the four quartiles (from Q1 to Q4) were 0.59 (0.40, 0.87), 0.54 (0.40, 0.72), 0.72 (0.57, 0.91) and 0.65 (0.53, 0.80), respectively (all Ps < 0.01). There's no significant difference of hazard ratios by intervention across risk quartiles (P for interaction = 0.370). Only the relative risk of hypotension, not symptomatic hypotension, was elevated in the intervention group among upper three quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive BP lowering strategy designed by CRHCP group was effective and safe in preventing cardiovascular events independent of baseline CVD risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03527719.

2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

AIM: The "2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, chronic symptomatic, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from October 2020 to June 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that was published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2023 during the peer review process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables where appropriate. STRUCTURE: Recommendations from the "2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with peripheral artery disease have been developed.

2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

AIM: The "2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, chronic symptomatic, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from October 2020 to June 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that was published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2023 during the peer review process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables where appropriate. STRUCTURE: Recommendations from the "2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with peripheral artery disease have been developed.

The Efficacy of Antihypertensive Drugs in Lowering Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Events in the Elderly Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. One of the main risk factors for cardiovascular events is hypertension. The use of antihypertensive drugs can protect against these events. It occurs directly through the control of hypertension and indirectly through other cardiovascular effects. This meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to assess the impact of various antihypertensive medications (ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, etc.) on blood pressure and various cardiovascular outcomes. A thorough search was conducted using several online databases and search engines, including PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Medline, Embase, and others. RCTs evaluating the impact of antihypertensive medications on BP and other cardiovascular events like coronary heart disease and stroke were included in this study. Included were studies detailing the use of antihypertensive medication in monotherapy. The meta-analysis was done using RevMan version 5.4 software (Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK). Means and standard deviations were extracted for the continuous variables and events, and the total sample number was extracted for the dichotomous variables. This analysis encompassed a total of 18 RCTs of the elderly population. The data for each variable was extracted independently, and analysis was performed. Overall, systolic blood pressure (SBP) revealed an impact of -11.88, CI=95% (-20.56, -3.19). The diastolic blood pressure (DBP) showed -5.41, CI=95% (-9.62, -1.20), myocardial infarction 0.92, CI=95% (0.82, 1.04), stroke 0.83, CI=95% (0.74, 0.94), and cardiovascular mortality 0.93, CI=95% (0.86, 1.00). Heterogeneity was present due to the variable sample size of the studies and other unidentified biases. In conclusion, there was a significant reduction in the elderly population's risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death when antihypertensive medications were taken.

Efficacy and Safety of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering After Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to comprehensively examine the available data on the efficacy and safety of intensive blood pressure lowering (IBPL) compared to standard blood pressure control (SBPC) in patients with acute ischemic stroke following reperfusion therapy. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted using 4 databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science to collect relevant articles from inception to December 2023. The endpoints were the condition of the patient measured by the modified Rankin scale (mRS, range value from 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) at 90 days, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, death within 90 days, recurrent ischemic stroke, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). RESULTS: Seven eligible studies involving 4499 participants (2218 patients in IBPL group and 2281 patients in SBPC group) were included in the analysis. Both groups demonstrated similar baseline characteristics. Within the endovascular therapy (EVT) subgroup, the IBPL group exhibited worse mRS than in SBPC group. After EVT, different IBPL targets showed worse outcomes in the mRS for the SBP <140 mmHg and SBP <120 mmHg subgroups, with no difference between IBPL and SBPC groups in the SBP <130 mmHg subgroup. In the intravenous thrombolysis subgroup, although the IBPL group exhibited less ICH, the long-term functional outcomes were not improved significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The IBPL group exhibited a less favorable functional outcome after EVT. Moreover, no worse functional outcomes were noticed in the SBP <130 mmHg subgroup after EVT. However, the functional outcome was similar after intravenous thrombolysis.

Mode of Presentation of Hypertension in a Group of Hypertensive Patients in Erbil.

Background Hypertension is a major public health problem, and it remains the major preventable cause of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality worldwide. Most cases are asymptomatic and discovered incidentally. Objectives The objective of this study is to identify (i) the proportion of hypertensive patients diagnosed incidentally and those diagnosed due to symptoms, (ii) the most common symptoms among patients that present with symptoms, (iii) the presentation of acute elevations of blood pressure in hypertensive patients, and (iv) hypertension-related symptoms affect compliance with medications. Patients and methods A cross-sectional study was carried out on 386 hypertensive patients in two public health care centres and public places in Erbil, the capital of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, from December 20, 2021, to February 7, 2022. Data was collected through interviews with the patients using a questionnaire designed by the researchers. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results The majority (76.5%) of patients were diagnosed because they got their blood pressure measured due to symptoms. The likelihood of being diagnosed incidentally was not significantly different with age, gender, age at diagnosis, socioeconomic status, or having one or more risk factors. The most common symptoms were headache followed by lightheadedness. Since diagnosis, 87.7% of subjects reported feeling symptoms with elevations in blood pressure, most commonly headaches followed by lightheadedness. Women and individuals belonging to a low socioeconomic status were more likely to report feeling symptoms. Whether or not patients felt symptoms with elevations of blood pressure, it didn't significantly affect compliance with medications. Conclusion The majority of hypertensive patients are diagnosed once they develop symptoms or complications, and a small percentage are diagnosed incidentally. Screening for hypertension in our region may be inadequate. Treatment rates were high. Hypertension-related symptoms didn't seem to affect compliance with medications.

Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on the Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering: Results From the STEP Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: The STEP (Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients) trial demonstrated that intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering has cardiovascular benefits. However, the influence of baseline diastolic blood pressure (DBP) on the effects of intensive blood pressure lowering on cardiovascular outcomes has not been fully elucidated. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the STEP trial. Participants were randomly allocated to intensive (110 to <130 mm Hg) or standard (130 to <150 mm Hg) treatment groups. The effects of intensive SBP lowering on the primary composite outcome (stroke, acute coronary syndrome, acute decompensated heart failure, coronary revascularization, atrial fibrillation, and cardiovascular death), major adverse cardiac event (a composite of the individual components of the primary outcome except for stroke), and all-cause mortality were analyzed according to baseline DBP as both a categorical and a continuous variable. RESULTS: The 8259 participants had a mean age of 66.2±4.8 years, and 46.5% were men. Participants with lower DBP were slightly older and had greater histories of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. Within each baseline DBP quartile, the mean achieved DBP was lower in the intensive versus standard group. The effects of intensive SBP lowering were not modified by baseline DBP as a continuous variable or as a categorical variable (quartiles, or <70, 70 to <80, and ≥80 mm Hg; all P value for interaction >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effects of intensive SBP lowering on cardiovascular outcomes were unaffected by baseline DBP. Lower DBP should not be an obstacle to intensive SBP control. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03015311.

What predicts drug-free type 2 diabetes remission? Insights from an 8-year general practice service evaluation of a lower carbohydrate diet with weight loss.

Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is often regarded as a progressive, lifelong disease requiring an increasing number of drugs. Sustained remission of T2D is now well established, but is not yet routinely practised. Norwood surgery has used a low-carbohydrate programme aiming to achieve remission since 2013. Methods: Advice on a lower carbohydrate diet and weight loss was offered routinely to people with T2D between 2013 and 2021, in a suburban practice with 9800 patients. Conventional 'one-to-one' GP consultations were used, supplemented by group consultations and personal phone calls as necessary. Those interested in participating were computer coded for ongoing audit to compare 'baseline' with 'latest follow-up' for relevant parameters. Results: The cohort who chose the low-carbohydrate approach (n=186) equalled 39% of the practice T2D register. After an average of 33 months median (IQR) weight fell from 97 (84-109) to 86 (76-99) kg, giving a mean (SD) weight loss of -10 (8.9)kg. Median (IQR) HbA1c fell from 63 (54-80) to 46 (42-53) mmol/mol. Remission of diabetes was achieved in 77% with T2D duration less than 1 year, falling to 20% for duration greater than 15 years. Overall, remission was achieved in 51% of the cohort. Mean LDL cholesterol decreased by 0.5 mmol/L, mean triglyceride by 0.9 mmol/L and mean systolic blood pressure by 12 mm Hg. There were major prescribing savings; average Norwood surgery spend was £4.94 per patient per year on drugs for diabetes compared with £11.30 for local practices. In the year ending January 2022, Norwood surgery spent £68 353 per year less than the area average. Conclusions: A practical primary care-based method to achieve remission of T2D is described. A low-carbohydrate diet-based approach was able to achieve major weight loss with substantial health and financial benefit. It resulted in 20% of the entire practice T2D population achieving remission. It appears that T2D duration <1 year represents an important window of opportunity for achieving drug-free remission of diabetes. The approach can also give hope to those with poorly controlled T2D who may not achieve remission, this group had the greatest improvements in diabetic control as represented by HbA1c.

Worldwide associations of fruit and vegetable supply with blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: an ecological study.

Low fruit and vegetable consumption is a major modifiable risk factor for raised blood pressure (BP), but it is unknown how heterogeneity in national supply has contributed to BP trends. To address this, we characterised supply trends from 1975 to 2015 and whether it met WHO recommendations. We then examined associations with three metrics: systolic, diastolic and raised BP. We used ecological data on fruit and vegetable supply and on BP for 159 countries. We examined trends in fruit and vegetable supply from 1975 to 2015 by country and World Bank income region. Multivariable linear regression was used to examine cross-sectional associations with BP. Global fruit and vegetable supply increased from 1975 to 2015, but with heterogeneous national and regional trends. While WHO recommendations were met globally, this target was not met in almost half the countries, of which many were low-income countries. Significant associations between combined fruit and vegetable supply and raised BP were observed. Over the past four decades, combined fruit and vegetable supply has been consistently and strongly associated with lower prevalence of raised BP globally. However, the heterogeneous regional trends in fruit and vegetable supply underpin the need for international organisations and individual governments to introduce or strengthen policies for increased fruit and vegetable supply to reduce the burden of non-communicable diseases at national and global levels.

Effect of intensive blood pressure lowering on left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Successful antihypertensive management can limit left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and improve the clinical prognosis. However, it remains unclear whether intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering has a greater effect on the occurrence and regression of LVH compared to standard BP lowering. METHODS: We searched the electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science from inception to 2 June 2023. Relevant and eligible studies were included. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULT: Four RCTs including 20,747 patients met our inclusion criteria. The results demonstrated that intensive BP lowering was associated with a significantly lower rate of LVH (OR 0.85; 95%CI: 0.78-0.93; I2 48.6%) in patients with hypertension compared to standard BP lowering. Subgroup analysis revealed that the effect of intensive BP lowering on LVH was more pronounced in patients with high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (OR 0.82; 95%CI: 0.72-0.93; I2 57.9%). In addition, intensive BP lowering led to significant regression of LVH (OR 0.68; 95%CI: 0.52-0.88; I2 45.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that intensive BP lowering should be instigated as soon as possible for optimal control of BP and to prevent regression of LVH, especially in patients with high risk of CVD. However, caution is warranted when treating hypertensive patients with LVH to systolic blood pressure (SBP) targets below 130 mm Hg.

We conducted a meta-analysis of four randomised controlled trials involving 20,747 patients with hypertension. The result suggested that intensive BP lowering should be instigated as soon as possible for optimal control of BP and to prevent regression of LVH, especially in patients with high risk of CVD. However, caution is warranted when treating hypertensive patients with LVH to SBP targets below 130 mm Hg.

Blood pressure-lowering medication prescribing, its adherence to guidelines and relationship with blood pressure control at a family medicine department.

Background: In many resource-constrained countries, control of blood pressure (BP) is low. Antihypertensive drug prescribing practices may influence BP control. However, adherence of prescribing to treatment guidelines may not be optimal in resource-constrained settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pattern of blood pressure-lowering medication prescribing, and how it adheres to treatment guidelines, and to identify the relationship between medication prescriptions and BP control. Methods: It was a cross-sectional study of hypertensive outpatients at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH) Family Medicine department (FMD)/Polyclinic. Data was collected with a validated structured form. Adherence of "prescribing" to recommendations of the 2017 Standard Treatment Guidelines of Ghana and 2018 European Society of Cardiology guidelines was assessed using a composite measure. We analyzed data with SPSS. Results: About 81% (247/304) of patients received two or more antihypertensive drugs. Most patients (41%; 267/651) received calcium channel blockers (CCB), and 21.8% (142/651), 15.7% (102/651) and 12.7% (83/651) were on diuretics, angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors respectively. CCB plus RAS inhibitor (50%) was the most prescribed two-drug combination. Number of BP drugs per patient had a statistically significant inverse relationship with BP control (beta Coefficient = -0.402; 95% Cl: 1.252-2.470; p = 0.015). The composite adherence score was 0.73 (moderate adherence) but Single-pill combination (SPC) was poor (3.2%; n = 8). Conclusion: Most patients received multiple-pill combination treatment, and overall adherence to guidelines was suboptimal, largely owing to complex drug therapy. Number of drugs predicted BP control. Our findings suggest a need to prioritize simplified treatment, and implement other strategies to improve hypertension guideline adherence. Further research on the influence of SPC on BP control may inform future hypertension guidelines in Ghana and elsewhere in Africa.

The second randomized controlled ENhanced Control of Hypertension ANd Thrombectomy strokE stuDy (ENCHANTED2): Protocol and progress.

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty exists over the optimal level of blood pressure (BP) after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). OBJECTIVES: We aim to determine the effectiveness and safety of intensive BP-lowering following MT reperfusion of large-vessel occlusion (LVO)-related AIS. DESIGN: The second ENhanced Control of Hypertension ANd Thrombolysis strokE stuDy (ENCHANTED2) is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) trial of intensive systolic BP (SBP) control in reperfused (extended treatment in cerebral infarction (eTICI) classification 2b/2c/3) LVO-AIS patients with persistent hypertension (SBP ⩾ 140 mmHg) at 60+ sites in China, and Australia and the United Kingdom. Eligible patients are centrally randomly allocated to more- (target SBP ⩽ 120 mmHg within 1 h) or less-intensive (target SBP 140-180 mmHg) BP management, to be maintained for 72 h. Primary outcome is an ordinal shift analysis of scores on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days. Sample size of 2257 patients provides 90% power to detect a 6.5% absolute reduction in poor outcome from more-intensive BP-lowering using ordinal logistic regression. PROGRESS: Recruitment started in China in July 2020. At a meeting of the independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board in March 2022 to review primary outcome data available for 347 patients, they recommended suspension of recruitment due to safety concerns in the more-intensive group; which was implemented by the Trial Steering Committee (TSC) with 817 randomized patients only in China. The TSC then stopped recruitment after the safety concerns persisted on further review of the data in June 2022. The TSC will make a decision on restarting the trial with modification of the protocol when the results are made public. DISCUSSION: ENCHANTED2 will provide further randomized evidence on the role of intensive BP-lowering after reperfusion in MT-treated AIS patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04140110; registered 25 October 2019.