Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
International Journal of Surgery ; (12): 672-675, 2008.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) | ID: wpr-398341

RESUMO

Objective To compare the effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined choledochoscopic exploration( method A)and duodenoscopic sphincterotomy combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy( method B) in treating choledocholithiasis with cholecystohthia-sis. Methods A retrospective study was adopted to analyze by statistical methods comparatively the clinical data of 114 patients, concerning operation time, blood lost, odynolysis rate, conversion rate,calculi residual rate ,complication rate ,hospitalization time and cost, et al. 68 cases were treated by method A,and 72 ca-ses were treated by method B. Results There were statistical differences in calculi residual rate, a conver-sion rate, apart complication rates and hospitalization cost between two groups, but there was no statistical difference in other index. Conclusion The two methods for choledocholithiasis and cholecystohthiasis has advantage and shortcoming respectively. The treatment for patients must be individualized by MRCP/USG, actual state of illness, and so on.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA