Impact of COVID-19 pandemic among patients with lung and head and neck cancer assisted in a public cancer center in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: There is no updated national data regarding the real impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on delaying diagnosis and treatment among patients with lung, and head, and neck cancers in Brazil. This study aimed to analyze the COVID-19 pandemic impact on cancer diagnosis and clinical outcomes among lung, head, and neck cancer patients assisted in a tertiary cancer center in Southeastern Brazil, as well as to analyze these patients' pretreatment clinical features. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of patients with lung or head and neck cancer assisted in a tertiary cancer center in southeastern Brazil between January/2019 and December/2021. To assess statistical differences among groups [i.e., cohort 2019 versus (vs.) 2020 and 2019 vs. 2021] chi-square test was used with a 5% significance level and 90% power for sample size calculation. Differences among baseline clinical features and sociodemographic characteristics were evaluated either by T-test for two samples or Fisher's or Pearson's chi-square test (for quantitative or qualitative variables). All utilized tests had a 5% significance level. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-two patients were included, 332 with lung and 320 with head and neck cancer; it was observed a significant decrease in oncologic treatment recommendations and increase in palliative care recommendation for patients with lung cancer, despite similar stages at diagnosis. During the COVID-19 pandemic, more pain symptoms were reported at the first Oncology assessment for patients with head and neck cancer (p < 0.05). Compared to 2019, head and neck cancer patients diagnosed in 2021 presented a worse initial performance status (p = 0.008). There was a statistically significant increase in survival for patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer in 2021 when compared to 2019 (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: This research highlights low survival rates for patients with lung and head and neck cancer in Brazil, even before the pandemic started, as consequence of advanced diseases at diagnosis at the public health system and clinical degrading features. Additionally, there was an increase incidence in both lung cancer and head and neck cancer despite no differences in clinical stage. This reflects how fragile is the public healthcare system even before facing an acute public health crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, the total impact on public health may follow for many years.

Analysis of pharmaceutical interventions in chemotherapy prescriptions of adult and pediatric patients at an oncology reference institute.

Chemotherapy, one of the primary cancer treatments, has a high risk of causing significant harm in cases of its misuse. Pharmaceutical intervention is one of the strategies used to prevent medication errors from reaching the patient by identifying drug-related problems or other discrepancies related to patient data or medical progress. The primary objective of this study was to analyze the profile of the pharmaceutical intervention made in chemotherapy prescriptions for adult and pediatric patients in order to measure its impact on patient safety. A retrospective cross-sectional and observational study was conducted at a reference center for cancer treatment in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Pharmaceutical interventions performed in chemotherapy prescriptions from January to October 2022 were quantified, classified, and analyzed by their type, most common medicine, and acceptability. From the patients treated in the period, 220 (14.8%) adults and 64 (23.4%) children and teenagers received at least one pharmaceutical intervention. The most common types for adults were dose adjustments: overdose (22.5%) and underdose (22.5%). However, in pediatry, incompleteness of supporting drug protocol (22.1%) was the most registered. The most common medicines involved in pharmaceutical intervention were carboplatin (for adults) and electrolytes/hydration (for pediatric patients). Pharmaceutical intervention acceptability by prescriptors was very similar, reaching 80.4% for adults and 77.9% for pediatrics. The pharmaceutical intervention profile was quite distinct by virtue of the singularities of each population. The pharmacists' role was shown to be paramount in intercepting medication errors in the prescription of chemotherapy protocols, contributing to patient safety.

Highlights of the 'I Congress ecancer Choosing Wisely' March 30 and 31, 2022 Santa Cruz, Bolivia.

The ecancer 'Choosing Wisely' conference was held for the first time in Latin America in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. The event had more than 150 registered attendees in addition to 22 speakers from different countries and different specialities in the field of oncology, who presented topics on prevention, oncological surgery, clinical oncology and palliative care, in order to demonstrate the current evidence of how to approach a patient in daily clinical practice based on the human resources, materials and drugs available, trying to offer the maximum benefit to the patient based on current scientific evidence. In addition to addressing issues of vital importance in breast cancer, during the 2 days of the event, updated information generated in recent years was presented, the results of which will change clinical practice. All the experts were in favour of developing strategies and methods that help us to properly select treatments to optimise resources and reduce the economic toxicity of the most modern and current treatments. This conference was an event of vital importance because it was the first face-to-face event for ecancer and the physicians after difficult years due to COVID-19.

Incidence and risk factors of adverse events in pediatric hemato-oncological patients: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric hemato-oncological (HO) patients are highly susceptible to the occurrence of adverse events (AE), nevertheless few research has been done in this field. Our aim was to describe the incidence, type, severity and preventability of AE in these patients, including bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients, and to identify patient's risk factors for having an AE. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. Children under 18yo hospitalized at the HO or BMT ward in 2016 were eligible for the study. Type of AE, severity and preventability were described as absolute and relative frequencies. Cumulative incidence of patients with at least one AE (CI_AE) and the rate of occurrence of all AE were calculated. Risk factors (sex, recovery probability, comorbidities and being a BMT patient) were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: 114 patients were included, 58% were male, average age was 8.7yo and 25 were BMT patients. 44 had at least one AE, with CI_AE of 38.6% (95%CI 29.7-47.5). Overall rate of occurrence of AE was 2.5 cases per 100 patients-day (95%CI 2.15-2.98). For BMT and non-BMT patients they were 2.8 (95%CI 2.2-3.6) and 2.5 (95%CI 1.98-3.1) respectively. Healthcare related infection was the most frequent AE. Most AE were moderate and with high preventability. Being a BMT patient was the only independent factor associated with the occurrence of at least one AE (OR=11.5, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that AE tend to be moderate and preventable in HO pediatric patients. BMT patients seem to be at greater risk of having an AE. Strategies focused on patient safety need to account for their specific characteristics.

Analysis of the interventions in antineoplastic therapy by a clinical pharmacy service at a tertiary hospital in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Medication errors are avoidable occurrences that can assume clinically significant dimensions and impose relevant costs to the health system, especially in the context of antineoplastic therapy. OBJECTIVE: Assess the clinical significance and economic impacts of a clinical pharmaceutical service. This retrospective study consists of an analysis of pharmacy interventions and drug-related problems found in a review of electronic prescriptions referring to antineoplastic therapy of a public teaching tertiary hospital in Brazil. METHOD: Retrospective descriptive study obtained from electronic records of drug-related problems and pharmaceutical interventions related to antineoplastic therapy for oncological and hematological diseases, obtained through the pharmacotherapy review service. The accepted interventions were analyzed for the financial impact generated, evaluating your direct costs. The perception of clinical significance of a random sample of interventions was ascertained by the experts' opinion, using the Delphi method. RESULTS: The most frequent problem was a "lack of information to professionals" (25.06%), "problems as to the frequency and interval of doses" (22.90%), and "medication underdosing" (16.20%). Dose adjustment (31.50%) and clarifications (30.90%) were the most frequent pharmaceutical interventions. In the second round of Delphi, experts rated 77.77% of interventions as extremely significant and very significant. The main drugs reported in the interventions were cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, methotrexate, folinic acid, and monoclonal antibodies. The savings amounted to US$1,193,970.18 and involved mainly bortezomib, dactinomycin, and monoclonal antibodies. CONCLUSION: Clinical pharmacy services contributed to the rational use of medicines presenting clinical significance and avoiding waste of financial resources.

Is there a place for optimizing thoracic radiotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer after twenty years?

Thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) is one of the main treatments in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). Hyperfractionated TRT (45 Gy, 1.5 Gy twice daily) has been the standard of care (SOC) since Turrisi and colleagues published the results of their clinical trial in 1999. Two meta-analyses have demonstrated the benefits of concurrent chemotherapy and TRT in terms of intrathoracic disease control at 2 years and 3-year overall survival (OS). The phase 2 trial by Grønberg et al (2016) comparing once-daily hypofractionated TRT to twice-daily hyperfractionated TRT in LS-SCLC found similar outcomes in both groups in terms of response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), grade 3-4 adverse effects, and OS. The CONVERT trial, published in 2017, failed to demonstrate the superiority of the conventional scheme (once-daily TRT) vs twice-daily radiotherapy, despite the application of modern radiotherapy techniques and a quality assurance programme, thus confirming the twice-daily hyperfractionated regimen as the SOC. At the 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting, Grønberg et al reported preliminary findings from a phase 2 trial comparing two different TRT dose regimens (45 Gy vs 60 Gy), both administered twice daily. Those data demonstrated a marked improvement in 2-year survival rates in the high dose arm (70.2% vs 46.1%, P = 0.002), despite similar objective response rates and PFS outcomes. Those findings provide a new treatment alternative to consider: Hyperfractionated, high-dose TRT. However, the results of that trial will need to be validated in a large, randomized phase 3 study. The results of the phase 2 CALCG 30610 trial will help to clarify the optimal dose and regimen. The potential role of upfront immunotherapy, which early data suggest may improve OS, also needs to be determined.

Síndrome de vena cava superior en pediatría. Una revisión de la literatura / Superior vena cava syndrome in pediatrics. A review of the literature

Las urgencias oncológicas son un reto para el clínico. El síndrome de vena cava superior es una emergencia hemato-oncológica en pediatría, el cual se define como la obstrucción intrínseca o extrínseca de la vena cava superior. La clínica más frecuente en pediatría es la aparición de circulación colateral, edema en esclavina y cianosis facial. El diagnóstico es clínico y debe hacerse lo menos invasivamente posible y de una manera rápida, para iniciar cuanto antes su manejo. Los linfomas, el uso prolongado de catéter venoso central y la cirugía cardiovascular en cardiopatías congénitas, son las principales etiologías. En algunas ocasiones, puede ser necesario un tratamiento empírico para salvar la vida del paciente, mediante el uso de esteroides y radioterapia. El objetivo del presente artículo es revisar y actualizar los aspectos más importantes sobre la etiología, las manifestaciones clínicas, el diagnóstico y el tratamiento del síndrome de vena cava superior en pediatría

Oncological emergencies are a challenge for the clinician. The superior vena cava syndrome is a hemato-oncological emergency in pediatrics; it is defined as an intrinsic or extrinsic obstruction of the superior vena cava. The most frequent clinical manifestations in children are the appearance of collateral circulation, edema in the body and facial cyanosis. The diagnosis is clinical and should been done as little invasively as possible and without delay to start its management as soon as possible. Lymphomas, prolonged use of a central venous catheter, and cardiovascular surgery in congenital heart disease are the main etiologies. In some cases, empirical treatment may be necessary to save the patient's life, through the use of steroids and radiotherapy. The aim of this article is to review and update the most important aspects of the etiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment of the superior vena cava syndrome in pediatrics

The Value of Biomarkers in Optimizing the Use of Immuno-oncologic Therapy.

The development of therapies that restore or activate the host immune response - the socalled "immuno-oncologic" therapy - has improved the survival of some cancer patients harboring specific tumor types. These drugs, however, are very expensive which has greatly limited their use and consequently reduced the number of patients who could likely benefit. Not to mention, the proportion of patients who display a clinical benefit from therapy is limited. Thus, from a clinical and health economics perspective, there is a pressing need to identify and treat those patients for whom a given immuno- oncologic therapy is most likely to be beneficial. At this end, the identification, validation and use of biomarkers emerge as an important therapeutic tool. Here, we briefly review the state of immunologic biomarker development and utilization and make suggestions for interested clinicians, health policy makers and other stakeholders to prepare for the broader use of biomarkers associated with immuno-oncologic therapy in routine practice. The biomarker field is clearly in its earliest stages and there is no doubt that continued research will identify new biomarkers with valuable clinical indications. Of course, the clinical utility of a biomarker must consider patient preferences and perspectives. In addition, health economic analyses are crucial to better define the value of immunotherapy based on precision medicine strategies and promote value-based pricing.

A survey of perceptions, attitudes, knowledge and practices of medical oncologists about cancer pain management in Spain.

PURPOSE: To monitor oncologists' perspective on cancer pain management. METHODS: An anonymized survey was conducted in two waves. First, over a convenience sample of oncologists known to be particularly concerned with the management of pain. Second, using a random sample of oncologists. RESULTS: In total, 73 and 82 oncologists participated in the first and second wave, respectively. Many oncologists reported to have good knowledge of analgesic drugs (95.9%), the mechanism of action of opioids (79.5%), and good skills to manage opioid-related bowel dysfunction (76.7%). Appropriate adjustment of background medication to manage breakthrough pain was reported by 95.5% of oncologists. Additionally, 87.7% (68.3% in the second wave, p = 0.035) of oncologists reported suitable opioid titration practices, and 90.4% reported to use co-adjuvant medications for neuropathic pain confidently. On the other hand, just 9.6% of oncologists participated in multidisciplinary pain management teams, and merely 30.3 and 27.1% reported to routinely collaborate with the Pain Clinics or involve other staff, respectively. Only 26.4% of the oncologists of the second wave gave priority to pain pathophysiology to decide therapies, and up to 75.6% reported difficulties in treating neuropathic pain. Significantly less oncologists of the second wave (82.9 vs. 94.5%, p = 0.001) used opioid rotation routinely. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike in previous surveys, medical oncologists reported in general good knowledge and few perceived limitations and barriers for pain management. However, multi-disciplinary management and collaboration with other specialists are still uncommon. Oncologists' commitment to optimize pain management seems important to improve and maintain good practices.

PET/TC en sarcoidosis asociada a enfermedad oncológica / PET/TC en sarcoidosis asociada a enfermedad oncológica

Objetivos: Considerar el diagnóstico de sarcoidosis y reacción sarcoid-like en pacientes oncológicos controlados por tomografía computada por emisión de positrones (PET/TC), que presentan adenopatías hiliomediastinales hipercaptantes, para evitar errores diagnósticos. Materiales y métodos: Se analizaron retrospectivamente 18 estudios PET/TC realizados durante 3 anos a pacientes con tumores sólidos y linfoma, que presentaron adenopatías hiliomediastinales hipermetabólicas. El patrón morfológico, la distribución y, en algunos casos, la asociación con nódulos pulmonares permitieron plantear como diagnóstico diferencial la sarcoidosis. Resultados: Las enfermedades oncológicas correspondieron a mama (n = 4), próstata (n = 3), ovario (n = 2) y otros (n = 9). En 9 pacientes se obtuvo la confirmación histopatológica. En 7 de los 18 pacientes, las adenopatías fueron catalogadas como benignas por confirmación histológica de sarcoidosis, antracosis o reacción sarcoid-like. En 5 el comportamiento evolutivo fue compatible con benignidad, en 2 la biopsia mostró secundarismo y en los 4 restantes la evolución demostró malignidad. El total de lesiones benignas fue de 12 (66%). Discusión: El hallazgo de adenopatías hiliomediastinales hipermetabólicas con patrón morfológico y de distribución que orientan a sarcoidosis lleva a plantear esta entidad. En pacientes oncológicos, se requiere biopsia para descartar recaída. El uso de nuevos marcadores PET/TC para un diagnóstico diferencial representa un desafío. Los trazadores de síntesis de aminoácidos, como la 18F-fluorotimidina (FLT) y 18F-fluorometiltirosina (FMT), han demostrado ser útiles en la diferenciación entre malignidad y enfermedades granulomatosas. Conclusión: En estudios PET/TC de pacientes oncológicos, la presencia de adenopatías hiliomediastinales bilaterales y simétricas debe plantear sarcoidosis como diagnóstico diferencial.

Purposes: To describe the radiological findings of sarcoidosis or sarcoid-like reactions in cancer patients being monitored by positron emission computed tomography (PET/CT). Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 18 PET/CT studies performed over 3 years in patients with lymphomas and solid tumours who presented with hypermetabolic hiliar-mediastinal adenopathies. The morphological pattern of these adenopathies, the distribution, and in some cases the association with pulmonary nodules, might suggest sarcoidosis as a differential diagnosis. Results: Oncological diseases corresponded to breast (4), prostate (3), ovary (2), and others (9). The adenopathies were classified in 7 of the 18 patients as benign after histological confirmation of sarcoidosis, anthracosis or sarcoid-like reaction. The evolutionary behaviour in 5 patients was compatible with benign lesions. The biopsy of 2 patients indicated secondary lesions and malignancy was confirmed by the evolution of the 4 remaining cases. There was a total of 12 (66%) benign lesions. Discussion: Sarcoidosis must be suspected in the presence of hypermetabolic hiliar-mediastinal adenopathies with a characteristic morphological pattern and pulmonary changes. However, biopsy is required to rule out oncological recurrence. The use of new PET/CT markers for differential diagnosis represents a challenge. Aminoacid synthesis tracers such as 18F-fluorothymidine (FLT) and 18F-fluoromethyltyrosine (FMT) are useful in the differentiation between malignancy and granulomatous diseases in oncologic patients. Conclusion: The differential diagnosis of sarcoidosis should be considered in the presence of bilateral symmetric mediastinal hilum lymphadenopathies.