Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Versus Navigation to Determine Cup Anteversion in Direct Anterior Total Hip Replacement: A Technical Trick for Obtaining "True" Anteversion.

During acetabular cup positioning, intraoperative measurements of cup anteversion were taken using both fluoroscopy and navigation system. With the C-arm introduced at 40°, an anteroposterior view of the pelvis is taken. The C-arm is then centered over the hip, showing an anteverted cup with an approximate inclination of 40°. The axial C-arm is tilted away until the cup opening is visualized as a straight line, indicating that the beam of the fluoroscopy is aligned with the cup's anteversion. The tilt angle on the C-arm and anteversion reading on the navigation workstation were recorded. The high degree of agreement between fluoroscopic and navigation measurement of acetabular cup anteversion supports the use of fluoroscopy in settings with limited access to navigation systems in direct anterior total hip arthroplasty.

Navigated augmented reality through a head-mounted display leads to low deviation between planned, intra- and post-operative parameters during glenoid component placement of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a proof-of-concept case series.

BACKGROUND: Navigated augmented reality (AR) through a head-mounted display (HMD) has led to accurate glenoid component placement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in an in-vitro setting. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the deviation between planned, intra-, and postoperative inclination, retroversion, entry point and depth of the glenoid component placement during RSA, assisted by navigated AR through a HMD, in a surgical setting. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter study was conducted. All consecutive patients undergoing RSA in two institutions, between August 2021 and January 2023, were considered potentially eligible for inclusion in the study. Inclusion criteria were: age >18 years, surgery assisted by AR through a HMD, and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans at six weeks. All participants agreed to participate in the study and an informed consent was provided in all cases. Preoperative CT scans were undertaken for all cases and used for three-dimensional (3D) planning. Intra-operatively, glenoid preparation and component placement were assisted by a navigated AR system through a HMD in all patients. Intraoperative parameters were recorded by the system. A postoperative CT scan was undertaken at 6 weeks, and 3D reconstruction was used for obtaining postoperative parameters. The deviation between planned, intra-, and postoperative inclination, retroversion, entry point, and depth of the glenoid component placement was calculated. Outliers were defined as >5° for inclination and retroversion and >5 mm for entry point. RESULTS: 17 patients (9 females, 12 right shoulders) with a mean age of 72.8±9.1 years old (range, 47.0 to 82.0) met inclusion criteria. The mean deviation between intra- and postoperative measurements was 1.5°±1.0° (range, 0.0° to 3.0°) for inclination, 2.8°±1.5° (range, 1.0° to 4.5°) for retroversion, 1.8±1.0 mm (range, 0.7mm to 3.0mm) for entry point, and 1.9±1.9 mm (range, 0.0mm to 4.5mm) for depth. The mean deviation between planned and postoperative values was 2.5°±3.2° (range, 0.0° to 11.0°) for inclination, 3.4°±4.6° (range, 0.0° to 18.0°) for retroversion, 2.0±2.5 mm (range, 0.0° to 9.7°) for entry point, and 1.3±1.6 mm (range, 1.3mm to 4.5mm) for depth. There were no outliers between intra- and postoperative values and there were three outliers between planned and postoperative values. The mean time (minutes:seconds) for the tracker unit placement and the scapula registration was 03:02 (range, 01:48 to 04:26) and 08:16 (range, 02:09 to 17:58), respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of a navigated AR system through a HMD in RSA led to low deviations between planned, intra-operative and postoperative parameters for glenoid component placement.

Computer-Assisted Navigation in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Surgical Experience and Clinical Outcomes.

Background: The primary cause of medium- to long-term complications in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is the failure of the glenoid component. The purpose of this study was to evaluate both the achievement of planning through computer-assisted navigation and the clinical outcomes at a minimum follow-up (FU) of 12 months. Methods: From December 2019 to December 2022, 57 Equinoxe RSAs with computer-assisted navigation were performed. The average age was 72.8 ± 6.6 years. Using the Orthoblue software, the version and inclination of the glenoid were evaluated from a preoperative CT scan, and planning was performed. Intraoperative navigation data were evaluated, and the clinical outcomes were assessed at a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Results: The average follow-up was 30.7 ± 13.5 months. The planning was reproduced in all implants. No errors in the computer-assisted navigation system were detected. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded. At the final FU, the average active anterior elevation was 143° ± 36°, external rotation was 34° ± 5°, QuickDASH score was 19 ± 16 points, and constant score was 77 ± 18. Conclusions: Computer-assisted navigation is a reliable system for positioning prosthetic implants on challenging glenoids. A longer follow-up period is necessary to confirm the reduction in postoperative complications and the increase in survival compared to traditional RSA.

Patient-reported outcome differences for navigated and robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty frequently do not achieve clinically important differences: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) using computer-assisted navigation (N-THA) and robot-assisted surgery (RA-THA) has been increasingly adopted to improve implant positioning and offset/leg-length restoration. Whether clinically meaningful differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) compared to conventional THA (C-THA) are achieved with intraoperative technology has not been established. This systematic review aimed to assess whether published relative PROM improvements with technology use in THA achieved minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE/Cochrane Library were systematically reviewed for studies comparing PROMs for primary N-THA or RA-THA with C-THA as the control group. Relative improvement differences between groups were compared to established MCID values. Reported clinical and radiographic differences were assessed. Review of N-THA and RA-THA literature yielded 6 (n = 2580) and 10 (n = 2786) studies, respectively, for analyses. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in postoperative PROM scores were reported in 2/6 (33.3%) studies comparing N-THA with C-THA, though only 1 (16.7%) reported clinically significant relative improvements. Statistically significant improvements in postoperative PROMs were reported in 6/10 (60.0%) studies comparing RA-THA and C-THA, though none reported clinically significant relative improvements. Improved radiographic outcomes for N-THA and RA-THA were reported in 83.3% and 70.0% of studies, respectively. Only 1 study reported a significant improvement in revision rates with RA-THA as compared to C-THA. CONCLUSIONS: Reported PROM scores in studies comparing N-THA or RA-THA to C-THA often do not achieve clinically significant relative improvements. Future studies reporting PROMs should be interpreted in the context of validated MCID values to accurately establish the clinical impact of intraoperative technology.

Functional and Radiological Outcomes of All-Posterior Surgical Correction of Dystrophic Curves in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: To determine outcomes following all-posterior surgery using computed tomography navigation, hybrid stabilization, and multiple anchor point techniques in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) and dystrophic scoliosis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Previous studies favored antero-posterior fusion as the most reliable method; however, approaching the spine anteriorly was fraught with significant complications. With the advent of computer assisted navigation and multiple anchor point method, posterior only approach is reporting successful outcomes. METHODS: This study included patients who underwent all-posterior surgical deformity correction for dystrophic NF-1 curves. Coronal and sagittal Cobbs angles, apical rotation, and the presence of dystrophic features were evaluated before surgery. Postoperatively, sagittal, coronal, and axial correction, implant position, and implant densities were evaluated. The decline in curve correction and implant-related complications were evaluated at follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised index. RESULTS: This study involved 50 patients with a mean age of 13.6 years and a mean follow-up duration of 5.52 years. With a mean coronal flexibility of 18.7%, the mean apical vertebral rotation (AVR), preoperative coronal Cobb angle, and sagittal kyphosis were 27.4°, 64.01°, and 47.70°, respectively. The postoperative mean coronal Cobb angle was 30.17° (p <0.05), and the sagittal kyphosis angle was 25.4° (p <0.05). The average AVR correction rate was 41.3%. The correction remained significant at the final mean follow-up, with a coronal Cobb angle of 34.14° and sagittal kyphosis of 25.02° (p <0.05). The average implant density was 1.41, with 46% of patients having a high implant density (HID). The HID had a markedly higher mean curve correction (29.30° vs. 38.05°, p <0.05) and a lower mean loss of correction (5.7° vs. 3.8°, p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing computer-assisted navigation, hybrid instrumentation, and multiple anchor point technique and attaining high implant densities, this study demonstrates successful outcomes following posterior-only surgical correction of dystrophic scoliosis in patients with NF-1.

Anterior cervical osteotomy of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis lesions with computer-assisted navigation surgery: A case report.

Key Clinical Message: Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) involves spine ligament ossification. Computer-assisted navigation (CAN) effectively aids complex surgeries, such as anterior cervical osteotomy, to alleviate progressive DISH-related dysphagia. Abstract: We describe a 68-year-old man with sudden onset dysphagia to both solids and liquids. Radiographic Imaging revealed DISH lesions from C2 down to the thoracic spine. The patient was successfully treated with CAN anterior osteotomy and resection of DISH lesions from C3-C6 and had complete symptom relief within 2 weeks post-operatively.

Improving alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric assessment of a surgical navigation tool with computed tomography imaging.

PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy of an imageless, optical surgical navigation tool to assist with femoral and tibial bone cuts performed during TKA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six board-certified orthopedic surgeons participated in a laboratory cadaver investigation, performing femoral and tibial bone cuts with the assistance of a computer navigation tool. Femoral and tibial varus/valgus, tibial slope, femoral flexion, and both femoral and tibial rotation measurements from the device were compared with angular measurements calculated from computed tomography (CT) images of the knees. RESULTS: Measurements with the navigation tool were highly correlated with those obtained from CT scans in all three axes. For the distal femoral cut, the absolute mean difference in varus/valgus was 0.83° (SD 0.46°, r = 0.76), femoral flexion was 1.91° (SD 1.16°, r = 0.85), and femoral rotation was 1.29° (SD 1.01°, r = 0.88) relative to Whiteside's line and 0.97° (SD 0.56°, r = 0.81) relative to the posterior condylar axis. For the tibia, the absolute mean difference in varus/valgus was 1.08° (SD 0.64°, r = 0.85), posterior slope was 2.78° (SD 1.40°, r = 0.60), and rotation relative to the anteroposterior axis (posterior cruciate ligament to the medial third of the tibial tuberosity) was 2.98° (SD 2.54°, r = 0.79). CONCLUSION: Utilization of an imageless navigation tool may aid surgeons in accurately performing and monitoring femoral and tibial bone cuts, and implant rotation in TKA and thus, more accurately align TKA components.

Free-Hand MIS TLIF without 3D Navigation-How to Achieve Low Radiation Exposure for Both Surgeon and Patient.

BACKGROUND: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is one of the most frequently performed spinal fusion techniques, and this minimally invasive (MIS) approach has advantages over the traditional open approach. A drawback is the higher radiation exposure for the surgeon when conventional fluoroscopy (2D-fluoroscopy) is used. While computer-assisted navigation (CAN) reduce the surgeon's radiation exposure, the patient's exposure is higher. When we investigated 2D-fluoroscopically guided and 3D-navigated MIS TLIF in a randomized controlled trial, we detected low radiation doses for both the surgeon and the patient in the 2D-fluoroscopy group. Therefore, we extended the dataset, and herein, we report the radiation-sparing surgical technique of 2D-fluoroscopy-guided MIS TLIF. METHODS: Monosegmental and bisegmental MIS TLIF was performed on 24 patients in adherence to advanced radiation protection principles and a radiation-sparing surgical protocol. Dedicated dosemeters recorded patient and surgeon radiation exposure. For safety assessment, pedicle screw accuracy was graded according to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification. RESULTS: In total, 99 of 102 (97.1%) pedicle screws were correctly positioned (Gertzbein grade A/B). No breach caused neurological symptoms or necessitated revision surgery. The effective radiation dose to the surgeon was 41 ± 12 µSv per segment. Fluoroscopy time was 64 ± 34 s and 75 ± 43 radiographic images per segment were performed. Patient radiation doses at the neck, chest, and umbilical area were 65 ± 40, 123 ± 116, and 823 ± 862 µSv per segment, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using a dedicated radiation-sparing free-hand technique, 2D-fluoroscopy-guided MIS TLIF is successfully achievable with low radiation exposure to both the surgeon and the patient. With this technique, the maximum annual radiation exposure to the surgeon will not be exceeded, even with workday use.

Comparison of major spine navigation platforms based on key performance metrics: a meta-analysis of 16,040 screws.

PURPOSE: The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare available computer-assisted navigation platforms by key performance metrics including pedicle screw placement accuracy, operative time, neurological complications, and blood loss. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using major databases for articles comparing pedicle screw accuracy of computer-assisted navigation to conventional (freehand or fluoroscopy) controls via post-operative computed tomography. Outcome data were extracted and pooled by random-effects model for analysis. RESULTS: All navigation platforms demonstrated significant reduction in risk of breach, with Stryker demonstrating the highest accuracy compared to controls (OR 0.16 95% CI 0.06 to 0.41, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%) followed by Medtronic. There were no significant differences in accuracy or most surgical outcome measures between platforms; however, BrainLab demonstrated significantly faster operative time compared to Medtronic by 30 min (95% CI - 63.27 to - 2.47, P = 0.03, I2 = 74%). Together, there was significantly lower risk of major breach in the navigation group compared to controls (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.27-0.63, P < 0.0001, I2 = 56%). CONCLUSIONS: When comparing between platforms, Stryker demonstrated the highest accuracy, and Brainlab the shortest operative time, both followed by Medtronic. No significant difference was found between platforms regarding neurologic complications or blood loss. Overall, our results demonstrated a 60% reduction in risk of major breach utilizing computer-assisted navigation, coinciding with previous studies, and supporting its validity. This study is the first to directly compare available navigation platforms offering insight for further investigation and aiding in the institutional procurement of platforms. LEVEL 3 EVIDENCE: Meta-analysis of Level 3 studies.

Accuracy of bony resection under computer-assisted navigation for bone sarcomas around the knee.

BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted navigation has made bone sarcoma resections more precise. However, further clinical studies involving accuracy analyses under navigation are still warranted. METHODS: A retrospective study for analysis of computer-assisted navigation accuracy was carried out. Between September 2008 and November 2017, 39 cases of bone sarcomas around the knee joint were resected under computer-assisted navigation. The control group comprised 117 cases of bone sarcomas around the knee treated by limb salvage surgery wherein bony cutting was achieved freehand. The length difference (LD) was defined as the specimen length minus the planned resection length. The LDs were detected in both groups and compared. The margin accuracy (MA) was defined as the achieved margin minus the desired margin at the bone cutting site and was detected in the navigation group. RESULTS: The LDs between the postoperative specimen length and the preoperative planned length were compared. In the navigation group, the LD was 0.5 ± 2.5 mm (range, - 5 to 5 mm), while in the freehand group, the LD was 3.4 ± 9.6 mm (range, - 20 to 29 mm), with a significant difference (P < 0.01). In the absolute value analysis, the LD absolute value was 2.0 ± 1.6 mm in the navigation group and 8.3 ± 6.0 mm in the freehand group, with a significant difference (P < 0.01). In the navigation group, the MA was 0.3 ± 1.5 mm (range, - 3 to 3 mm) and the MA absolute value was 1.1 ± 1.0 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Better accuracy can be achieved when computer-assisted navigation is conducted for bone sarcoma resection around the knee. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Comparative Study on Accuracy of Intra-Operative Computed Tomography-Navigation Based Pedicle Screw Placement With Skin vs Bone Fixed Dynamic Reference Frame in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of intra-operative navigation-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw insertion between bone fixed and skin fixed dynamic reference frame (DRF) in Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). METHODS: Between October 2018 and September 2022, patients who underwent MIS-TLIF were included in this study with DRF fixed either on bone (group B) or skin (group S). Pedicle screws were inserted under the guidance of intra-operative Cone bean Computed tomography (cbCT) based navigation. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement was immediately checked by a final intra-operative cbCT Spin. RESULTS: Among 170 patients, group B included 91 patients and group S included 79 patients. Out of total 680 screws, 364 screws (group B) and 316 screws (group S) were placed. Patient's demographic data and distribution of screws showed no statistically significant difference. The accuracy showed no significant difference between both the groups (94.5% in group B and 94.3% in group S). CONCLUSION: Skin fixed DRF can serve as an alternate way for placement and avoids extra incision with similar accuracy in pedicle screw insertions with bone fixed DRF using intra-operative CT guided navigation in MIS TLIF.

Is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? A Google trends analysis from the point of public interest.

Computer-assisted navigation system (CAS) and robotic assisted surgery (RAS) have been widely used in joint arthroplasty, but few studies focused on public interest. We aimed to evaluate current trend and seasonality of public interest in CAS and RAS arthroplasty over the past 10 years, and forecast the future development. All data related to CAS or RAS arthroplasty from January 2012 to December 2021 were collected through Google Trends. Public interest was described by relative search volume (RSV). Pre-existing trend was evaluated by linear and exponential models. Time series analysis and ARIMA model were utilized to analyze the seasonality and future trend. R software 3.5.0 was for statistics analysis. Public interest in RAS arthroplasty has been continuously increasing (P < 0.001) and exponential model (R2 = 0.83, MAE = 7.35, MAPE = 34%, RSME = 9.58) fitted better than linear one (R2 = 0.78, MAE = 8.44, MAPE = 42%, RSME = 10.67). CAS arthroplasty showed a downtrend (P < 0.01) with equivalent R2 (0.04) and accuracy measures (MAE = 3.92, MAPE = 31%, RSME = 4.95). The greatest popularity of RAS was observed in July and October, while the lowest was in March and December. For CAS, a rise of public interest was in May and October, but lower values were observed in January and November. Based on ARIMA models, the popularity of RAS might continuously increase and nearly double in 2030, along with a stability with slight downtrend for CAS. Public interest in RAS arthroplasty has been continuously increasing and seems to maintain this uptrend in the next 10 years, whereas popularity of CAS arthroplasty will likely remain stable.

An experience of displaced third molar roots removed using computer-assisted navigation system.

The frequency of displacement of a third molar root is low and considered a rare incident. A computer-assisted navigation system is a surgical support system that allows the patient to confirm the surgical site in three dimensions during surgery has recently been introduced to oral and maxillofacial surgery. We used a computer-assisted navigation system to remove a displaced third molar root in the floor of the mouth without complications and report the outline of the procedure and the effectiveness of the computer-assisted navigation system safety. This was a 56-year-old male who underwent extraction of the mandibular right third molar at a referral clinic. At that time, the proximal root fracture remained in the extraction socket, and the distal root fracture displaced to floor of the mouth. The patient was referred to our hospital immediately after tooth extraction. We extracted the displaced third molar root fracture under general anesthesia using a computer-assisted navigation system to accurately locate the root fracture and performed minimally invasive extraction. The root extraction was performed 18 days after the initial tooth extraction. No lingual nerve exposure was observed during surgery. No sensory abnormalities in the lower lip or tongue were observed postoperatively. Computer-assisted navigation system is a useful surgical support system that enables oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures and prevents postoperative complications such as lingual nerve palsy safety.

Technological Advances in Spine Surgery: Navigation, Robotics, and Augmented Reality.

Accurate screw placement is critical to avoid vascular or neurologic complications during spine surgery and to maximize fixation for fusion and deformity correction. Computer-assisted navigation, robotic-guided spine surgery, and augmented reality surgical navigation are currently available technologies that have been developed to improve screw placement accuracy. The advent of multiple generations of new technologies within the past 3 decades has presented surgeons with a diverse array of choices when it comes to pedicle screw placement. Considerations for patient safety and optimal outcomes must be paramount when selecting a technology.

Computer-Assisted Navigation Is Associated With Decreased Rates of Hardware-Related Revision After Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To (1) define utilization trends for navigated instrumented posterior lumbar fusion (PLF), (2) compare reasons and rates of revision at 30-day, 60-day, 90-day, and 1-year follow-up, and (3) compare 90-day perioperative complications between navigated versus conventional instrumented PLF. METHODS: Patients who underwent navigated or conventional instrumented PLF were identified from the Humana insurance database using the PearlDiver Patient Records between 2007-2017. Usage of navigation was characterized. Patient demographics and operative characteristics (number of levels fused, interbody usage) were compared between the 2 treatment groups. Propensity score matching was done and comparisons were made for revision rates at different follow-up periods (categorized by reasons) and other 90-day perioperative complications. RESULTS: This study included 1,648 navigated and 23 429 conventional instrumented PLF. Navigated cases increased over the years studied to approximately 10% in 2017. Statistical analysis after propensity score matching revealed significantly lower rates of hardware-related revision at 90-day follow-up in the navigated cohort (0.49% versus 1.15%, P = .033). At 1-year follow-up, the navigated cohort continued to have significantly lower rates of hardware-related revision (1.70% versus 2.73%, P = .044) as well as all cause revision (2.67% versus 4.00%, P = .032). There were no statistical differences between the 2 cohorts in any of the 90-day perioperative complications studied, such as cellulitis and blood transfusion (P > .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that navigation is associated with reductions in hardware-related revisions after instrumented PLF. However, these results should be interpreted cautiously in the setting of potential confounding by other unmeasured variables.

The learning curve associated with imageless navigation in total knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Computer-assisted navigation systems (CAS) are increasingly being integrated into total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures, but perceptions of associated learning curve and increased operative time continue to curtail uptake. Newer-generation navigational systems aim to streamline integration into surgical workflow to mitigate increases in operative time. Here, we assess the impact of a novel imageless CAS on operative time for TKA. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of a cohort of patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA with one of three surgeons between October 2019 and March 2020 was conducted. Consecutive cases using a novel imageless CAS were included in analysis. For each surgeon, average operative time was recorded and compared in sequential five-case cohorts to average operative time for the same procedure performed conventionally using a two-tailed t test. RESULTS: Average conventional operative times were 95.9 ± 15.0, 86.6 ± 13.7, and 116.9 ± 25.1 min for the three surgeons. Initial CAS-assisted operative times increased to 107.0 ± 9.8 (p = 0.07) and 102.4 ± 13.2 (p = 0.06) min for Surgeons 1 and 2 and decreased to 113.2 ± 9.8 min (p = 0.52) for Surgeon 3. Most recent CAS-assisted operative times were 94.8 ± 13.9 (p = 0.88), 88.7 ± 15.3 (p = 0.84), and 104.8 ± 13.2 (p = 0.12) min as compared to pre-CAS. Absolute differences for the most recent navigated procedures ranged from 12.1 min faster to 2.0 min slower. CONCLUSION: The learning curve for TKA navigation may be as few as 10 cases, and any associated increases in operative time may be transient and non-significant. Moreover, navigation may ultimately speed operative time, perhaps as the result of enhanced intraoperative assessment of alignment.

Combined use of 3D printing and computer-assisted navigation in the clinical treatment of multiple maxillofacial fractures.

OBJECTIVES: In the field of computer-assisted surgery, 3D printing technology and computer-aided navigation (CAN) technology have led to advances in craniofacial surgery. However, the application of these two techniques in maxillofacial fractures is mostly limited to unilateral zygomatic bone and zygomatic arch fractures, and few studies have investigated their use for multiple maxillofacial fractures. This study summarizes the combined application of 3D printing technology and CAN for complex maxillofacial fractures to guide clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with multiple maxillofacial fractures from 09/2017 to 03/2021 were retrospectively studied and divided according to surgical method into an experimental group (navigation-aided surgery combined with a 3D-printed guide) and a control group (navigation-aided surgery only). The surgical time was compared between the groups, and posttreatment computed tomography and follow-up visits were conducted at 1 week and 3 months, respectively, to compare the quality of treatment in terms of infection, occlusal disorder, restricted mouth opening, midline displacement, and bilateral asymmetry. RESULTS: According to our results, the combined use of CAN and 3D printing significantly improved the treatment results of double-sided maxillofacial fractures (rs = 0.448, P < 0.05). The surgical time of the experimental group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (Z = -2.083, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study broadens our understanding of the treatment of multiple maxillofacial fractures. The combined use of 3D printing technology and CAN effectively shortened the operation time and achieved a better therapeutic effect.

Use of intraoperative technology in total knee arthroplasty is not associated with reductions in postoperative pain.

PURPOSE: Our systematic review and meta-analysis sought to assess how technology-assistance impacts (1) post-operative pain and (2) opioid use in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Four online databases were queried for studies published up to October 2021 that reported on pain and opioid usage between technology-assisted and manual TKA (mTKA) patients. Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) models were utilized to calculate pooled mean difference (MDs) and 95% confidence interval (CIs). Subgroup analyses were conducted to isolate robotic-arm assisted (RAA) and computed-assisted navigation (CAN) cohorts. Risk of bias was assessed for all included non-randomized studies with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. For the randomized control trials included in our study, the Detsky scale was applied. RESULTS: Our analysis included 31 studies, reporting on a total of 761,300 TKAs (mTKA: n = 753,554; Computer-Assisted Navigation (CAN): n = 1,309; Robotic-Arm Assisted (RAA): n = 6437). No differences were demonstrated when evaluating WOMAC (MD: 0.00, 95% CI - 0.69 to 0.69; p = 1.00), KSS (MD: 0.01, 95% CI - 1.46 to 1.49; p = 0.99), KOOS (MD - 2.91, 95% CI - 6.17 to 0.34; p = 0.08), and VAS (MD - 0.54, 95% CI - 1.01 to - 0.007; p = 0.02) pain scores between cohorts. There was mixed evidence regarding how opioid consumption differed between TKA techniques. CONCLUSION: The present analysis demonstrated no difference in terms of pain across a variety of utilized patient-reported pain measurements. However, there were mixed results regarding how opioid consumption varied between manual and technology-assisted cohorts, particularly in the immediate post-operative period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Impact of Navigation on 30-Day Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database study. OBJECTIVE: Navigation has been increasingly used to treat degenerative disease, with positive radiographic and clinical outcomes and fewer adverse events and reoperations, despite increased operative time. However, short-term analysis on treating adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery with navigation is limited, particularly using large nationally represented cohorts. This is the first large-scale database study to compare 30-day readmission, reoperation, morbidity, and value-per-operative time for navigated and conventional ASD surgery. METHODS: Adults were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Multivariate regression was used to compare outcomes between navigated and conventional surgery and to control for predictors and baseline differences. RESULTS: 3190 ASD patients were included. Navigated and conventional patients were similar. Navigated cases had greater operative time (405 vs 320 min) and mean RVUs per case (81.3 vs 69.7), and had more supplementary pelvic fixations (26.1 vs 13.4%) and osteotomies (50.3 vs 27.7%) (P <.001).In univariate analysis, navigation had greater reoperation (9.9 vs 5.2%, P = .011), morbidity (57.8 vs 46.8%, P = .007), and transfusion (52.2 vs 41.8%, P = .010) rates. Readmission was similar (11.9 vs 8.4%). In multivariate analysis, navigation predicted reoperation (OR = 1.792, P = .048), but no longer predicted morbidity or transfusion. Most reoperations were infectious and hardware-related. CONCLUSIONS: Despite controlling for patient-related and procedural factors, navigation independently predicted a 79% increased odds of reoperation but did not predict morbidity or transfusion. Readmission was similar between groups. This is explained, in part, by greater operative time and transfusion, which are risk factors for infection. Reoperation most frequently occurred for wound- and hardware-related reasons, suggesting navigation carries an increased risk of infectious-related events beyond increased operative time.

Does computer-assisted navigation improve baseplate screw configuration in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Introduction: Navigation technologies have improved accuracy and precision in positioning glenoid components during shoulder arthroplasty. The influence of navigation on baseplate screw placement has not been independently investigated. This study aimed to evaluate and synthesize the best scientific evidence on the influence of intraoperative navigation on the length and number of screws for primary baseplate fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty procedures. Methods: In August 2022, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases were accessed. We analyzed the screw purchase length, the number of screws required for the fixation of the baseplate, and the proportion of cases fixed with two screws in all clinical trials, comparing navigation to standard instrumentation for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Following an evaluation of the heterogeneity of the studies, DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models were utilized to merge data from separate studies. Results: The systematic search revealed a total of 2034 articles. After excluding duplicates and irrelevant studies, 633 shoulder arthroplasties from 6 trials were included in the analysis. The pooled mean difference in screw purchase length was 5.839 mm (95 %CI 4.496 to 7. 182) in favor of navigation (P < .001). In addition, significant differences were also found in the number of screws per case (- 0.547, 95 %CI -0.890 to -0.203, P = .002) and in the proportion of cases fixed with two screws (Odds Ratio 3.182 95 %CI 1.057 to 9.579, P = .040) in favor of the navigation group. Conclusions: Intraoperative navigation improves the baseplate screw placement, allowing for a greater screw purchase length and fewer screws to achieve primary fixation of the glenoid component during reverse shoulder arthroplasty. It is unclear whether these improvements will increase the longevity of the prosthesis or the clinical outcomes of the patients.