Covering the intercostal artery branching of the Adamkiewicz artery during endovascular aortic repair increases the risk of spinal cord ischemia.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the relationship between covering the intercostal artery branching of the Adamkiewicz artery (ICA-AKA) and spinal cord ischemia (SCI) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods: Patients who underwent TEVAR from 2008 to 2022 were enrolled. Stent grafts covered the ICA-AKA in 108 patients (covered AKA group) and stent grafts didn't cover the ICA-AKA in 114 patients (uncovered AKA group). The characteristics of 58 patients from each group were matched based on propensity scores. Results: No significant differences in SCI rates were detected between the covered AKA (10%; 11/108) and uncovered AKA (3.5%; 4/114) groups (P = .061). Shaggy aorta (odds ratio [OR], 5.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.74-15.3, P = .003), iliac artery access (OR, 6.81; 95% CI, 2.22-20.9, P = .001), and procedural time (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02, P = .003) were risk factors for SCI in the entire cohort. Although covering the ICA-AKA (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 0.86-7.88, P = .058) was not a significant risk factor, shaggy aorta (OR, 8.15; 95% CI, 2.07-32.1, P = .003), iliac artery access (OR, 9.09; 95% CI, 2.22-37.2, P = .002), and procedural time (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01-1.02, P = .008) were risk factors for SCI in the covered AKA group. No significant risk factors were detected in the uncovered AKA group. Conclusions: Covering the ICA-AKA was not an independent risk for SCI in TEVAR. However, covering the ICA-AKA was indirectly associated with the risk of SCI in patients with shaggy aorta, iliac access, and procedural time.

Systematic Review of the Effect of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage on Outcomes After Endovascular Descending Thoracic/Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether prophylactic use of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage in endovascular descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (DTAA) and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair contributes to a lower rate of post-operative spinal cord ischaemia (SCI). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. REVIEW METHODS: A literature review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021245893). Risk of bias was assessed through the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS), and the certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE approach. A proportion meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the pooled rate and 95% confidence interval (CI) of both early and late onset SCI. Pooled outcome estimates were calculated using the odds ratio (OR) and associated 95% CI. The primary outcome was SCI, both early and lateonset. Secondary outcomes were complications of CSF drainage, length of hospital stay, and peri-operative (30 day or in hospital) mortality rates. RESULTS: Twenty-eight observational, retrospective studies were included, reporting 4 814 patients (2 599 patients with and 2 215 without CSF drainage). The NOS showed a moderate risk of bias. The incidence of SCI was similar in patients with CSF drainage (0.05, 95% CI 0.03 ‒ 0.08) and without CSF drainage (0.05, 95% CI 0.00 ‒ 0.14). No significant decrease in SCI was found when using CSF drainage (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.29 ‒ 1.55, p = .35). The incidence rate of CSF drainage related complication was 0.10 (95% CI 0.04 ‒ 0.19). The 30 day and in hospital mortality rate with CSF drainage was 0.08 (95% CI 0.05 ‒ 0.12). The 30 day and in hospital mortality rate without CSF drainage and comparison with late mortality and length of hospital stay could not be determined due to lack of data. The quality of evidence was considered very low. CONCLUSION: Pre-operative CSF drainage placement was not related to a favourable outcome regarding SCI rate in endovascular TAAA and DTAA repair. Due to the low quality of evidence, no clear recommendation on pre-operative use of CSF drainage placement can be made.

Lower-profile stent graft reduces the risk of embolism during thoracic endovascular aortic repair in shaggy aorta.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to reveal the association between lower-profile stent graft (LPSG) and embolism during thoracic endovascular aortic repair for non-dissecting distal arch and descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. METHODS: This study reviewed data of 35 patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair with LPSG (27 males; age: 77 ± 9.2 years) and 312 who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair with conventional-sized stent graft (CSSG) (247 males; age: 77 ± 7.4 years) from 2009 to 2021. RESULTS: The rate of total embolic events was significantly lower in the LPSG group (0/35 [0%]) than the CSSG group (34/312 [11.2%]) (P = 0.035). Shaggy aorta (odds ratio: 5.220; P < 0.001) were identified as positive embolic event predictors. The rate of total embolic events in 68 patients with shaggy aorta (12 in LPSG/56 in CSSG) was significantly lower in the LPSG group (0/12 [0%]) than the CSSG group (19/56 [34%]) (P = 0.015). The rate of total embolic events in 279 patients with the non-shaggy aorta (23 in LPSG/256 in CSSG) reveals no difference between the 2 groups (0 [0%]/16 [6.3%]) (P = 0.377). CONCLUSIONS: LPSG usage could reduce embolism in thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and the difference was more pronounced in patients with the shaggy aorta. LPSG might be beneficial in preventing embolism in thoracic endovascular aortic repair for patients with a shaggy aorta.

Recurrent endobronchial occlusion and aorto-bronchial fistula formation in Behcet's disease.

BACKGROUND: Behcet's disease is a multi-system inflammatory disorder. A small subset of patients with Behcet's develop relapsing polychondritis which is classified as a separate disease known as Mouth and Genital ulcers with inflamed cartilage (MAGIC syndrome). It has previously been observed that this condition can also affect the cartilaginous tissue in the tracheobronchial tree. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 44-year-old lady with Behcet's Disease, Mouth and Genital ulcers with inflamed cartilage (MAGIC) syndrome and an aortic Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) who presented to hospital with recurrent episodes of left lobar collapse of the lung. During bronchoscopy, we found the presence of multiple inflammatory endobronchial webs occluding segments of the left bronchial tree. Repeated examinations showed evidence that these inflammatory webs were progressing in size, density and location. Furthermore, we noticed herniation of her descending aortic FET into her left bronchial tree forming an aorto-bronchial fistula which was complicated by a graft infection. Her descending aortic FET section was surgically replaced with an open procedure and bronchoscopic interventions attempted to remove the occlusions in her bronchial tree. Despite optimisation of medical management and surgical correction, this patient continued to develop progressive occlusion of her left bronchial tree, resulting in a chronically collapsed left lung. CONCLUSIONS: A multi-disciplinary team approach is of paramount importance in order to optimally manage patients with Behcet's disease, balancing immunosuppressive regimens that need close monitoring and titration in the context of potential surgical intervention and the risk for intercurrent infection.

Reappraisal of the role of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during open distal aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative motor and somatosensory evoked potentials have been applied to monitor spinal cord ischemia during repair. However, their predictive values remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials on spinal cord ischemia during open distal aortic repair. METHODS: Our group began routine use of both somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials at the end of 2004. This study used a historical cohort design, using risk factor and outcome data from our department's prospective registry. Univariate and multivariable statistics for risk-adjusted effects of motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials on neurologic outcome and model discrimination were assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Both somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials were measured in 822 patients undergoing open distal aortic repair between December 2004 and December 2019. Both motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials were intact for the duration of surgery in 348 patients (42%). Isolated motor evoked potential loss was observed in 283 patients (34%), isolated somatosensory evoked potential loss was observed in 18 patients (3%), and both motor evoked potential and somatosensory evoked potential loss were observed in 173 patients (21%). No spinal cord ischemia occurred in the 18 cases with isolated somatosensory evoked potential loss. When both signals were lost, signal loss happened in the order of motor evoked potentials and then somatosensory evoked potentials. Immediate spinal cord ischemia occurred in none of those without signal loss, 4 of 283 (1%) with isolated motor evoked potential loss, and 15 of 173 (9%) with motor evoked potential plus somatosensory evoked potential loss. Delayed spinal cord ischemia occurred in 12 of 348 patients (3%) with intact evoked potentials, 24 of 283 patients (8%) with isolated motor evoked potentials loss, and 27 of 173 patients (15%) with motor evoked potentials + somatosensory evoked potentials loss (P < .001). Motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials loss were each independently associated with spinal cord ischemia. For immediate spinal cord ischemia, no return of motor evoked potential signals at the conclusion of the surgery had the highest odds ratio of 15.87, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.936, whereas motor evoked potential loss had the highest odds ratio of 3.72 with an area under the curve of 0.638 for delayed spinal cord ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: Somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials are both important monitoring measures to predict and prevent spinal cord ischemia during and after open distal aortic repairs. Intraoperative motor evoked potential loss is a risk for immediate and delayed spinal cord ischemia after open distal aortic repair, and somatosensory evoked potential loss further adds predictive value to the motor evoked potential.

A machine learning approach for predicting complications in descending and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: To use machine learning to predict rupture, dissection, and all-cause mortality for patients with descending and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in an effort to improve on diameter-based surgical intervention criteria. METHODS: Retrospective data from 1083 patients with descending aortic diameters 3.0 cm or greater were collected, with a mean follow-up time of 3.52 years and an average descending diameter of 4.13 cm. Six machine learning classifiers were trained using 44 variables to predict the occurrence of dissection, rupture, or all-cause mortality within 1, 2, or 5 years of initial patient encounter for a total of 54 (6 × 3 × 3) separate classifiers. Classifier performance was measured using area under the receiver operator curve. RESULTS: Machine learning models achieved area under the receiver operator curves of 0.842 to 0.872 when predicting type B dissection, 0.847 to 0.856 when predicting type B dissection or rupture, and 0.820 to 0.845 when predicting type B dissection, rupture, or all-cause mortality. All models consistently outperformed descending aortic diameter across all end points (area under the receiver operator curve = 0.713-0.733). Feature importance inspection showed that other features beyond aortic diameter, such as a history of myocardial infarction, hypertension, and patient sex, play an important role in improving risk prediction. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides surgeons with a more accurate, machine learning-based, risk-stratification metric to predict complications for patients with descending aortic aneurysms.

Two Cases of Descending Aortic Diverticulum Associated with the Right-Sided Aortic Arch / 日本心臓血管外科学会雑誌

Case 1 is a 70-year-old male. He has a history of cholelithiasis and left inguinal hernia. A preoperative examination of the inguinal hernia showed the enlargement of the mediastinal shadow, and he was referred to our department. A close examination revealed a right-sided aortic arch, a right descending aorta, and a descending aortic diverticulum. No subjective symptoms, intracardiac malformations, or other cardiovascular diseases were observed. The surgery was scheduled for descending aorta replacement including a diverticulum with right posterior lateral 4th intercostal thoracotomy and lower body partial extracorporeal circulation. However, due to aortic intima injury at the proximal end, hypothermic cerebral circulatory arrest and proximal anastomosis were performed by the open proximal method. There was no problem with the postoperative course, and he was discharged 19 days after surgery. Case 2 is a 51-year-old female. Born in China, she has lived in Japan for 15 years. No notable history. An abnormal shadow was shown on chest Xp performed in a medical examination, and aortic malformation was suspected on chest CT. She was referred to our department. The diagnosis was right-sided aortic arch, right descending aorta, aberrant left subclavian artery, and Kommerell diverticulum. There were no subjective symptoms and no intracardiac malformations. The operation was a two-stage operation. As the initial surgery, median sternotomy was performed, total arch replacement with intrathoracic reconstruction of the left subclavian artery, and open stent graft insertion, and the Kommerell diverticulum was covered with an open stent graft. We did not treat the diverticulum because it was located on the dorsal side. At 15 days after surgery, we performed embolization of the origin of the left subclavian artery from the Kommerell diverticulum. There was no problem with the postoperative course, and she was discharged 19 days after the initial surgery.

Endovascular repair of a ruptured, extremely tortuous, descending thoracic aorta aneurysm with aortic coarctation.

We have presented a case of a ruptured descending aortic aneurysm that was accompanied by extreme tortuosity and a pseudocoarctation at the level of the ligamentum arteriosum. We performed successful endovascular repair, covering the left subclavian artery, using a transapical-to-femoral artery (through-and-through) guidewire technique to overcome the tortuosity, with the option to perform balloon angioplasty in the case of an increased gradient over the coarctation. In the present case report, we have underlined the role of close collaborations with aortic expertise centers.

Aggressive use of prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage to prevent spinal cord ischemia during thoracic endovascular aortic repair is not supportive.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether prophylactic preoperative cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) was effective in preventing spinal cord ischemia (SCI) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair of degenerative descending thoracic aortic aneurysms, excluding dissecting aneurysms. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair involving proximal landing zones 3 and 4 between 2009 and 2020. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients with preemptive CSFD [68 men; median (range) age, 76.0 (71.0-81.0) years] and 115 patients without CSFD [89 men; median (range) age, 77.0 (74.0-81.5) years] were included in this study. Among them, 59 from each group were matched based on propensity scores to regulate for differences in backgrounds. The incidence rate of SCI was similar: 8/89 (9.0%) in the CSFD group and 6/115 (5.2%) in the non-CSFD group (P = 0.403). Shaggy aorta (odds ratio, 5.13; P = 0.004) and iliac artery access (odds ratio, 5.04; P = 0.005) were identified as positive predictors of SCI. Other clinically important confounders included Adamkiewicz artery coverage (odds ratio, 2.53; P = 0.108) and extensive stent graft coverage (>8 vertebrae) (odds ratio, 1.41; P = 0.541) were not statistically significant. Propensity score matching yielded similar incidence of SCI: 4/59 (6.8%) in the CSFD group and 3/59 (5.1%) in the non-CSFD group (P = 0.697). CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive use of prophylactic CSFD was not supportive in patients without complex risks of SCI.

Extensive cell salvage and postoperative outcomes following thoracoabdominal and descending aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: Cell salvage (CS) reduces intraoperative blood transfusion. However, it may cause deformity of the red blood cells and loss of coagulation factors, which may lead to unwanted sequelae. Thus, we hypothesized that extensive CS would lead to adverse outcomes after descending/thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (D/TAAA) repair. METHODS: Between 1991 and 2017, 2012 patients undergoing D/TAAA repair were retrospectively reviewed. After we excluded patients without reported intraoperative CS amount, patients were enrolled in the study (N = 1474) and divided into 2 groups: low CS (salvaged units <40, N = 983) and high CS (salvaged units ≥40, N = 491). Analyses were performed to verify the extensive CS as the risk factor for adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Preoperative demographics showed that the high-CS group had a significantly greater incidence of male patients (72% vs 58%), heritable aortic disease (24% vs 17%), redo (27% vs 20%), greater glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m2, 75 vs 66) and more extensive aneurysms (TAAA extent II-IV). The high-CS group had significantly more postoperative complications compared with the low-CS group, including respiratory failure, renal failure, cardiac complications, neurologic deficits, bleeding, and 30-day mortality. Multivariable analysis confirmed high CS was an independent risk factor for renal failure along with long bypass time, older age, and extent of repairs. There was an incremental risk of renal failure and 30-day mortality proportional to salvaged cell unit (P < .001 in both). CONCLUSIONS: Increased salvaged cell units were associated with adverse postoperative outcomes after D/TAAA repairs. Risk of renal failure and mortality increased proportionally to the salvaged cell units.

Differences in Mid-Term Outcomes Between Patients Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Aneurysm or Acute Aortic Syndromes: Report From the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment.

PURPOSE: To analyze differences in baseline characteristics, overall mortality, device-related mortality, and re-intervention rates in patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (DTAA) with atherosclerotic/degenerative cause or acute aortic syndrome (AAS), using the Global Registry For Endovascular Aortic Treatment (GREAT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients submitted to TEVAR for AAS or DTAA, included in GREAT, were eligible for this analysis. Primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality rate. Secondary outcomes were 30-day aorta-related mortality and re-intervention rate, 1-year and 3-year all-cause mortality, aorta-related mortality and re-intervention rate. RESULTS: Five-hundred and seventy-five patients were analyzed (305 DTAA and 270 AAS). Thirty-day mortality rate was 1.3% and 1.8% for DTAA and AAS, respectively (p=0.741). One-year and 3-year mortality rates were 6.2% versus 9.3 and 17.3% versus 15.9% for DTAA and AAS, respectively (p=0.209 and p=0.655, respectively). Aorta-related mortality rates at 30 days, 1 year and 3 years were 1.3%, 1.3%, and 2.6% for DTAA, 1.8%, 4.2%, and 4.2% for AAS (p=ns). Re-intervention rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years were 1.3%, 4.3%, and 7.5% for DTAA, 3.3%, 8.1%, and 10.7% for AAS (p=ns). Furthermore, a specific analysis with similar outcomes was performed dividing follow-up in 3 periods (1-30 days, 31-365 days, 366-1096 days) and describing mutual differences between 2 groups and temporal trends in each group. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent TEVAR for DTAA or AAS experienced different mortality and re-intervention rates among years during mid-term follow-up. Although all-cause related deaths within 30 days were TEVAR-related, aorta-related deaths were more common for AAS patients within 1 year. A greater re-intervention rate was described for AAS patients, although only 1 year after TEVAR.

Treatment Site Does Not Affect Changes in Pulse Wave Velocity but Treatment Length and Device Selection Are Associated With Increased Pulse Wave Velocity After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Background: Endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysm is associated with an increase in pulse wave velocity (PWV) after surgery. However, the effect of different types of endovascular devices on PWV at different sites of the thoracic aorta remains unclear. Objectives: The purposes of this study were (1) to investigate the changes in PWV after endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysm; (2) to evaluate whether there is a difference in the changes in PWV at different treatment sites; and (3) to evaluate the effect of treatment length on changes in PWV. Methods: From July 2008 to July 2021, 276 patients underwent endovascular treatment of the true thoracic aortic aneurysm. Of these patients, 183 patients who underwent preoperative and postoperative PWV measurement within 1 year of surgery were included in the study. The treatment length index was calculated by treatment length divided by the height of the patients. Results: Five different types of endovascular devices were used (Najuta, Kawasumi Laboratories, Inc., Tokyo, Japan; TAG, W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., AZ, USA; Relay, Bolton Medical, Inc., FL, USA; Talent/Valiant, Medtronic, MN, USA; and Zenith, Cook Medical, IN, USA). There was no significant change in PWV in patients receiving Najuta (Before: 2,040 ± 346.8 cm/s vs. After: 2,084 ± 390.5 cm/s, p = 0.14). However, a significant increase was observed in other devices: TAG (Before: 2,090 ± 485.9 cm/s vs. After: 2,300 ± 512.1 cm/s, p = 0.025), Relay (Before: 2,102 ± 465.3 cm/s vs. After: 2,206 ± 444.4 cm/s, p = 0.004), Valiant (Before: 1,696 ± 330.2 cm/s vs. After: 2,186 ± 378.7 cm/s, p < 0.001), and Zenith (Before: 2,084 ± 431.7 cm/s vs. After: 2,321 ± 500.6 cm/s, p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in PWV in patients treated from aortic arch (Before: 2,006 ± 333.7 cm/s vs. After: 2,132 ± 423.7 cm/s, p < 0.001) and patients treated from descending thoracic aorta (Before: 2,116 ± 460.9 cm/s vs. After: 2,292 ± 460.9 cm/s, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment site was not an independent factor associated with changes in PWV. However, Najuta (Coef -219.43, 95% CI -322.684 to -116.176, p < 0.001) and treatment index (Coef 147.57, 95% CI 24.826 to 270.312, p = 0.019) were independent factors associated with changes in PWV. Conclusion: Najuta did not show a significant increase in PWV, while other commercially available devices showed a significant increase. The treatment site did not have a different effect on PWV. However, the treatment length was an independent factor associated with an increase in PWV.

Safety of perioperative cerebrospinal fluid drain as a protective strategy during descending and thoracoabdominal open aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: We present our experience with routine application of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drain (CSFD) during open aortic repair. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 100 patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (DTAA) or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) or who underwent CSFD insertion before open repair between 2006 and 2017. All CSFDs were inserted by the cardiovascular anesthesia team. The goal was to keep intracranial pressure <10 mm Hg during the surgical procedure by draining CSF at a rate of 20 to 30 mL/h. Postoperatively, CSFD was set to maintain the lumbar pressure <10 mm Hg to reduce the risk of postoperative paraplegia. CSFD was part of our standard cord protection regimen. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 65.4 ± 11.7 years, and 60 (60%) were male. A CSFD was successfully inserted in all patients. The mean hospital length of stay was 11.9 ± 11.8 days, and hospital mortality was 6%. Postoperative transient paresis was observed in 4 patients (4%), and permanent paraplegia was seen in 2 (2%). CSFD-related complications were reported in 14 patients (14%). Complications included persistent CSF leakage and blood-tinged CSF with and without intracranial hemorrhage and spinal cutaneous fistula in 7 (7%), 9 (9%), and 1 (1%), respectively. Long-term survival was excellent (68.4% at 10 years). CONCLUSIONS: CSFD is a safe practice when applied routinely as an adjunct strategy to prevent paraplegia in surgical management of DTAA and TAAA. We feel that this contributed to good early and late clinical results.

Long-term outcomes of the conformable TAG thoracic endoprosthesis in a prospective multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: The Gore conformable TAG thoracic endoprosthesis (CTAG) was engineered to enhance conformability in the thoracic aorta and has demonstrated greater deployment accuracy and wall apposition than the original TAG device. The Food and Drug Administration approved the CTAG in 2011 based on the 1-year results of the pivotal trial for the CTAG device. In the present report, we have documented the outcomes for those patients through 5 years. METHODS: The CTAG aneurysm study was a prospective, multicenter trial that assessed the safety and effectiveness of the CTAG device as treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Follow-up imaging assessments consisted of radiographs and computed tomography at annual intervals through 5 years. A core imaging laboratory was used to assess the aneurysm size, device integrity, and endoleaks. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients were enrolled (51 pivotal arm patients and 15 continued access patients) from October 2009 through September 2011. The baseline characteristics, procedural characteristics, and outcomes through 2 years were reported previously. Through 5 years, five patients (7.6%) had required device-related reintervention (one type Ia endoleak or contained rupture of the descending thoracic aorta, one type Ib endoleak, two indeterminate endoleaks, and one thoracic aortic pseudoaneurysm). Four patients (6.1%) had died of aneurysm-related causes, with one death occurring within 30 days of the index procedure. A total of 24 patients (36.3%) had died during the 5-year study period. Seven patients (10.6%) had experienced stroke or transient ischemic attack through 5 years, with one early stroke (postoperative day 28). Prosthesis or intercomponent migration was observed in six patients (9.1%) through 5 years; however, no patient had developed a type III junctional endoleak. No stent-graft fracture or compression was observed through 5 years. At 5 years, 14 patients (50.0%) showed sac regression, 5 (17.9%) showed sac expansion, and 9 (32.1%) showed sac stability using on a 5-mm threshold for change. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the CTAG device was associated with low rates of aneurysm-related mortality and reintervention through 5 years. Proximal endoleak was rare, and most patients showed sac regression or stability at 5 years after the initial thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Severe intraluminal atheroma and iliac artery access affect spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for degenerative descending aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to reveal additional factors potentially contributing to the multifactorial ethiopathogenesis of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA). METHODS: The medical records of 293 patients who underwent TEVAR without debranching procedures for descending TAA between 2011 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. We excluded the following cases from the study: 72 patients with aortic dissection; 15 with rupture; 14 with anastomotic pseudoaneurysm; 22 with re-TEVAR; 34 without evaluation of the artery of Adamkiewicz (AKA). Sufficient data were available for 136 patients (79% men; mean age of 76 ± 7.4 years). We conducted univariable and multivariable analyzes using the logistic regression analysis to assess the relationship between pre-/intraoperative factors and postoperative SCI. RESULTS: SCI was observed in nine patients (6.8%). Severe intraluminal atheroma [odds ratio (OR), 6.23; p = 0.014] and iliac artery access (OR 4.65; p = 0.043) were identified as the positive predictors of SCI by univariable analysis. Risk factors of SCI were determined additionally as follows: coverage of the intercostal artery branching AKA (ICA-AKA) (OR 4.89; p = 0.054); coverage of the ICA-AKA combined with iliac access (OR 10.1; p = 0.002); that combined with severe intraluminal atheroma (OR 13.7; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Severe intraluminal atheroma and iliac artery access were the independent predicting factors of SCI after TEVAR for degenerative descending TAA. In patients with complicated aortoiliofemoral access route, coverage of the ICA-AKA is associated with the risk of SCI.

The first commercial use of the Valiant Navion stent graft system for endovascular repair of a descending thoracic aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVES: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the standard of care for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (DTAA), and newer generation stent grafts have significant design improvements compared to earlier generation devices. METHODS: We report the first commercial use of the Medtronic Valiant Navion stent graft for treatment of an 85-year-old woman with a 5.8 cm DTAA and a highly tortuous thoracic aorta. RESULTS: A percutaneous TEVAR was performed using a two-piece combination of the Valiant Navion FreeFlo and CoveredSeal stent graft configurations for zones 2-5 coverage. The devices were successfully delievered through highly tortuous anatomy and deployed, excluding the entire length of the aneurysm with precise landing, excellent apposition and no evidence of endoleak. The patient tolerated the procedure well and has had no stent graft-related complications through one-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Design enhancements such as a lower profile delivery system, better conformability, and a shorter tapered tip are some of the improvements to this third-generation TEVAR device. Coupled with the multiple configuration options available, this gives physicians a better tool to treat thoracic aortic pathologies in patients with challenging anatomy. The early results are encouraging, and evaluation of long-term outcomes will continue.

Respiratory Failure after Open Descending Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Risk Factors and Outcomes.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to identify predictors of respiratory failure after open repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (DTAA), and to identify any relationship between respiratory failure and long-term survival. METHODS: A total of 75 patients undergoing elective open DTAA repair at the Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the odds ratios for incident postoperative respiratory failure after open DTAA repair. Survival over time was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Respiratory failure, defined as ventilation dependence for longer than 48 hours, occurred in 11 patients (14.7%). Independent predictors of respiratory failure after DTAA included prolonged operation time and reduced preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity × 100 (FEV1%). In-hospital mortality was higher (p = 0.020) among patients with respiratory failure (18.2% of those who suffered respiratory failure) than among those without (0%). The survival rates at 8 years were significantly lower (p = 0.010) in the respiratory failure group (at 44.2%) than in the group without respiratory failure (at 89.0%). CONCLUSION: Lower FEV1% and longer operation time were risk factors of postoperative respiratory failure after open repair of DTAA, which in turn is associated with significantly reduced long-term survival.

Thoracic aortic remodeling with endografting after a decade of thoracic endovascular aortic repair experience.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) results have been studied in short-term time frames. This study aimed to evaluate midterm and long-term outcomes of TEVAR, emphasizing postoperative aortic remodeling and need for reintervention. METHODS: This is an institutional retrospective review of TEVAR for isolated descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Data were collected from 2004 to 2018. Primary outcomes studied included aneurysm sac remodeling, freedom from reintervention, and all-cause mortality. Other outcomes studied include endoleak rates, neurologic complication rates, and any overall postoperative complication rates. RESULTS: During the study period, 219 patients underwent TEVAR for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. The median effect of TEVAR on sac diameter was a 0.7-cm decrease in size (interquartile range, -1.4 to 0.0 cm). During the study period, 80% (n = 147) of patients experienced aneurysm sac regression or stability. Perioperative neurologic complications occurred in 16% (n = 34) of patients. Significant predictors of sac growth were endoleak (odds ratio [OR], 65; P < .001), preoperative carotid-subclavian bypass (OR, 8; P = .003), and graft oversizing <20% (OR, 15; P = .046). Every 1-mm increase in aortic diameter at the proximal TEVAR landing zone led to an increased odds of endoleak (OR, 2; P = .049). Access complications (OR, 8) and subclavian artery coverage (OR, 6) significantly increased the odds of reintervention, whereas every percentage of graft oversizing protected against reintervention (OR, 0.005). Life-table analysis revealed an overall survival of 78% (71%-83%) at median follow-up. At 3 years, survival was 88% (80%-93%) for those with aneurysm sac stability or regression, whereas it was 70% (49%-84%) for those with aneurysm sac growth (P = .0402). Cox proportional hazards model showed that the only protective factor for mortality was percentage oversizing, with every 1% of oversizing having a hazard ratio (HR) of <.001 (P = .032). This was counterbalanced by the fact that patients with graft oversizing >30% had an increased odds of mortality with HR >10 (P = .049). Other significant factors that increased the odds of mortality included endoleak (HR, 3.6; P = .033), diabetes (HR, 4.1; P = .048), age (every 1-year increase in age; HR, 1.2; P = .002), year of surgery (every year subsequent to 2004; HR, 1.3; P = .012), and peripheral artery disease (HR, 5.2; P = .041). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients (80%) experience sac stability or regression after TEVAR, which offers a clear survival advantage. Endoleaks are predictive of sac growth, conferring increased mortality. Rigorous surveillance is necessary to prevent future aortic events through reintervention.

[Surgical treatment of a patient with traumatic rupture of the aortic arch and late oesophageal perforation]. / Khirurgicheskoe lechenie bol'nogo s travmaticheskim razryvom dugi aorty i pozdnei perforatsiei pishchevoda.

Described herein is a clinical case report regarding a patient presenting with traumatic rupture of the aortic isthmus with the development of a pseudoaneurysm occupying virtually the entire posterior mediastinum and measuring 20?10 cm in size. He was immediately treated as an emergency to undergo prosthetic reconstruction of the portion of the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta by means of temporary bypass grafting with a synthetic graft in order to protect the visceral organs. The postoperative period was complicated by oesophageal perforation with the formation of an oesophago-paraprosthetic fistula, infection of the vascular graft, accompanied by the development of pleural empyema and mediastinitis. A second operative procedure was performed, consisting of subclavian-iliac bypass grafting on the right with a polytetrafluoroethylene graft measuring 20 mm in diameter, exclusion of the intrathoracic portion of the oesophagus, creation of a gastro- and oesophagostoma, retrieval of the vascular graft followed by suturing of the aorta, pleurectomy, decortication of the lung, and removal of the empyemic sac on the left. There was no evidence of ischaemia of the spinal cord or visceral arteries. One month postoperatively, he underwent a traumatological stage and 4 months thereafter plasty of the oesophagus with an isoperistaltic gastric pedicle, extirpation of the thoracic portion of the oesophagus, to be later on followed by closure of the oesophagostoma. The patient experienced no difficulties either while walking or during other physical activities, with the ankle-brachial index amounting to 0.9. With time, he developed difficult-to-correct pulmonary hypertension. Unfortunately, the patient eventually died of acute cardiopulmonary insufficiency 9 years after right-sided extra-anatomical subclavian-iliac bypass grafting.

Replacement of the descending thoracic aortic aneurysm with partial cardiopulmonary bypass in the era of endovascular repair.

OBJECTIVES: Although the advent of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has provided an alternative treatment option for descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (DTAA), open repair still plays a crucial role in DTAA repair. The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate the operative and long-term outcomes of open repair with partial cardiopulmonary bypass, compared to the results of TEVAR with a proximal landing zone of 3 or 4. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2017, open repair was performed for 44 patients and TEVAR for 282 patients. Acute aortic dissection and open proximal anastomosis under circulatory arrest were excluded. Perioperative and long-term follow-up data were analyzed. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality rate (4.5% vs 3.2%, p = 0.42), and frequencies of spinal cord injury and neurological deficit showed no significant differences between the open repair and TEVAR groups (p = 0.41, 0.25, respectively). The propensity score-matched analysis showed similar cumulative survival (p = 0.23), but significantly higher reintervention rates for the repaired segment in the TEVAR group than in the open repair group (p = 0.0054). Twenty-two (7.8%) TEVAR patients required re-interventions for the repaired segment. Of those, 17 patients underwent additional TEVAR and 5 patients needed open conversion surgery with partial cardiopulmonary bypass. Reintervention rates for the repaired segment were significantly higher in the TEVAR group than in the open repair group (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Open repair DTAA using partial cardiopulmonary bypass showed operative outcomes comparable to TEVAR and lower reintervention rates, and thus remains an acceptable procedure for selected patients in this era of endovascular repair.