Diagnostic Stewardship: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Blood Collection Diversion Devices Used to Reduce Blood Culture Contamination and Improve the Accuracy of Diagnosis in Clinical Settings.

Background: Blood culture contamination may lead to misdiagnosis, overutilization of antibiotics, and prolonged length of stay. Blood specimen diversion devices can reduce contamination rates during blood culture collection procedures. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis evaluating the influence of blood specimen diversion devices in blood culture contamination rates. Methods: We searched Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science, from database inception to 1 March 2023, for studies evaluating the impact of a diversion device on blood culture contamination. Blood culture contamination was a positive blood culture with microorganisms not representative of true bacteremia, but rather introduced during collection or processing the blood sample. Random-effects models were used to obtain pooled mean differences, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Results: Of 1768 screened studies, 12 met inclusion criteria for this systematic literature review. Of them, 9 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Studies were substantially heterogeneous, but stratified analyses considering only high-quality studies revealed that venipuncture using a diversion device was associated with a significant reduction in blood culture contamination in comparison to the standard procedure of collection (pooled odds ratio [OR], 0.26 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .13-.54]; I2 = 19%). Furthermore, the stratified analysis showed that the adoption of a diversion device did not reduce the detection of true infection (pooled OR, 0.85 [95% CI, .65-1.11]; I2 = 0%). Conclusions: Blood culture diversion devices was associated with decreased contamination rates and could improve quality of care, reduce costs, and avoid unnecessary antibiotic use.

FilmArray® Meningoencephalitis panel in the diagnosis of central nervous system infections: stewardship and cost analysis in a paediatric hospital in Chile.

BACKGROUND: Central nervous system (CNS) infection has been an ongoing concern in paediatrics. The FilmArray® Meningoencephalitis (FAME) panel has greater sensitivity in identifying the aetiology of CNS infections. This study's objective was to compare the aetiological identification and hospitalization costs among patients with suspected CNS infection before and after the use of FAME. METHODS: An analytical observational study was carried out using a retrospective cohort for the pre-intervention (pre-FAME use) period and a prospective cohort for the post-intervention (post-FAME use) period in children with suspected CNS infection. RESULTS: A total of 409 CSF samples were analysed, 297 pre-intervention and 112 post-intervention. In the pre-intervention period, a total of 85.5% of patients required hospitalization, and in the post-intervention period 92.7% required hospitalization (p < 0.05). Median of ICU days was significantly lower in the post-intervention period than it was in the pre-intervention period. The overall positivity was 9.4 and 26.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). At ages 6 months and below, we found an increase in overall positivity from 2.6 to 28.1%, along with an increased detection of viral agents, S. agalactiae, S. pneumoniae, and N. meningitidis. The use of this diagnostic technology saved between $2916 and $12,240 USD in the cost of ICU bed-days. FAME use provided the opportunity for more accurate aetiological diagnosis of the infections and thus the provision of adequate appropriate treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The cost/benefit ratio between FAME cost and ICU bed-day cost savings is favourable. Implementation of FAME in Chilean public hospitals saves public resources and improves the accuracy of aetiological diagnosis.

Clinical and Financial Impact of a Diagnostic Stewardship Program for Children with Suspected Central Nervous System Infection.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the optimal implementation and clinical and financial impacts of the FilmArray Meningitis Encephalitis Panel (MEP) multiplex polymerase chain reaction testing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in children with suspected central nervous system infection. STUDY DESIGN: A pre-post quasiexperimental cohort study to investigate the impact of implementing MEP using a rapid CSF diagnostic stewardship program was conducted at Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO). MEP was implemented with electronic medical record indication selection to guide testing to children meeting approved use criteria: infants <2 months, immunocompromised, encephalitis, and ≥5 white blood cells/µL of CSF. Positive results were communicated with antimicrobial stewardship real-time decision support. All cases with CSF obtained by lumbar puncture sent to the CHCO microbiology laboratory meeting any of the 4 aforementioned criteria were included with preimplementation controls (2015-2016) compared with postimplementation cases (2017-2018). Primary outcome was time-to-optimal antimicrobials compared using log-rank test with Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Time-to-optimal antimicrobials decreased from 28 hours among 1124 preimplementation controls to 18 hours (P < .0001) among 1127 postimplementation cases (72% with MEP testing conducted). Postimplementation, time-to-positive CSF results was faster (4.8 vs 9.6 hours, P < .0001), intravenous antimicrobial duration was shorter (24 vs 36 hours, P = .004), with infectious neurologic diagnoses more frequently identified (15% vs 10%, P = .03). There were no differences in time-to-effective antimicrobials, hospital admissions, antimicrobial starts, or length of stay. Costs of microbiologic testing increased, but total hospital costs were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of MEP with a rapid central nervous system diagnostic stewardship program improved antimicrobial use with faster results shortening empiric therapy. Routine MEP testing for high-yield indications enables antimicrobial optimization with unchanged overall costs.

Corrigendum: Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Escherichia coli Isolates from Urine Samples of Hospitalized Patients in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00243.].

Impact of Multiplex Testing on the Identification of Pediatric Clostridiodes Difficile.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the implementation of a multiplex gastrointestinal pathogen panel (GIP) was associated with changes in Clostridioides difficile (C difficile) testing and detection rates. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an observational study using interrupted time series analysis and included pediatric patients with testing capable of detecting C difficile. From 2013 to 2015 ("conventional diagnostic era"), stool testing included C difficile-selective polymerase chain reaction and other pathogen-specific tests. From 2015 to 2017 ("GIP era"), C difficile polymerase chain reaction was available along with the GIP, which detected 22 pathogens including C difficile, and replaced the need for additional tests. Outcomes included C difficile testing and detection rates in ambulatory, emergency department, and inpatient settings. RESULTS: There were 6841 tests performed and 1214 C difficile positive results. Across the 3 settings, GIP era had significantly higher C difficile testing (1.7-2.3 times higher) and C difficile detection rates (1.9-3.4 times higher) compared with conventional diagnostic era. After adjusting for the number of tests performed, detection rates were no longer significantly different. Of C difficile positive GIPs, 31% were coinfected with another organism. With GIP testing, patients 1 year of age had a significantly higher C difficile percent positivity than 2-year-old (P = .02) and 3- to 18-year-old children (P < .01). Younger children with C difficile were more likely to be coinfected (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Introducing a multiplex panel led to increased C difficile testing, which resulted in increased C difficile detection rates and potential identification and treatment of colonized patients. This highlights an important target for diagnostic stewardship and the challenges associated with multiplex testing.

Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Escherichia coli Isolates from Urine Samples of Hospitalized Patients in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are often caused by Escherichia coli. Their increasing resistance to broad-spectrum antibiotics challenges the treatment of UTIs. Whereas, E. coli ST131 is often multidrug resistant (MDR), ST69 remains susceptible to antibiotics such as cephalosporins. Both STs are commonly linked to community and nosocomial infections. E. coli phylogenetic groups B2 and D are associated with virulence and resistance profiles making them more pathogenic. Little is known about the population structure of E. coli isolates obtained from urine samples of hospitalized patients in Brazil. Therefore, we characterized E. coli isolated from urine samples of patients hospitalized at the university and three private hospitals in Rio de Janeiro, using whole genome sequencing. A high prevalence of E. coli ST131 and ST69 was found, but other lineages, namely ST73, ST648, ST405, and ST10 were also detected. Interestingly, isolates could be divided into two groups based on their antibiotic susceptibility. Isolates belonging to ST131, ST648, and ST405 showed a high resistance rate to all antibiotic classes tested, whereas isolates belonging to ST10, ST73, ST69 were in general susceptible to the antibiotics tested. Additionally, most ST69 isolates, normally resistant to aminoglycosides, were susceptible to this antibiotic in our population. The majority of ST131 isolates were ESBL-producing and belonged to serotype O25:H4 and the H30-R subclone. Previous studies showed that this subclone is often associated with more complicated UTIs, most likely due to their high resistance rate to different antibiotic classes. Sequenced isolates could be classified into five phylogenetic groups of which B2, D, and F showed higher resistance rates than groups A and B1. No significant difference for the predicted virulence genes scores was found for isolates belonging to ST131, ST648, ST405, and ST69. In contrast, the phylogenetic groups B2, D and F showed a higher predictive virulence score compared to phylogenetic groups A and B1. In conclusion, despite the diversity of E. coli isolates causing UTIs, clonal groups O25:H4-B2-ST131 H30-R, O1:H6-B2-ST648, and O102:H6-D-ST405 were the most prevalent. The emergence of highly virulent and MDR E. coli in Brazil is of high concern and requires more attention from the health authorities.