The Utility and Implications of Ambient Scribes in Primary Care.

Ambient scribe technology, utilizing large language models, represents an opportunity for addressing several current pain points in the delivery of primary care. We explore the evolution of ambient scribes and their current use in primary care. We discuss the suitability of primary care for ambient scribe integration, considering the varied nature of patient presentations and the emphasis on comprehensive care. We also propose the stages of maturation in the use of ambient scribes in primary care and their impact on care delivery. Finally, we call for focused research on safety, bias, patient impact, and privacy in ambient scribe technology, emphasizing the need for early training and education of health care providers in artificial intelligence and digital health tools.

Navigating the Complexities of Nursing Documentation When Patients Have Access to the Content: A Qualitative Study.

AIM: To explore how Danish registered nurses (RNs) in hospitals experience documenting nursing care in electronic patient records when the content is accessible to patients. METHODS: In a qualitative research design, data were generated in six focus groups conducted in late 2022 and early 2023, comprising 31 RNs employed in inpatient wards at a university hospital in Denmark. Subsequently, qualitative content analysis was applied to the gathered data. RESULTS: The findings include three themes: (1) weighing one's words, (2) building trust or triggering conflicts and (3) risking loss of knowledge. Together, these three themes illustrate the complexities that RNs navigate when patients have access to the content of nursing documentation. CONCLUSION: Patients' access to nursing documentation requires RNs to navigate a complex interplay of factors, including awareness of language-use, influence on the nurse-patient-relative relationships, and the risk of losing essential knowledge. Therefore, although patients' access to nursing documentation can induce a positive change in terms of strengthening the professional focus on documentation, it can also result in changes in documentation practices in ways that may compromise nursing documentation as a working tool. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: The findings emphasize an urgent need to explore and discuss how sensitive nursing observations can be shared in a safe and appropriate way when patients have access to the documentation. Furthermore, to prevent misunderstandings and conflicts with patients, it is essential to focus on and prioritize patient involvement in nursing documentation. IMPACT: RNs navigate complex practices when patients have direct online access to nursing documentation content. It is crucial to clarify which content nursing documentation should entail and how sensitive nursing observations can be shared in a safe and appropriate way. REPORTING: The COREQ checklist was used for reporting.

Enhancing laboratory biosafety management: a comprehensive strategy from theory to practice.

Objective: This study examines biosafety management practices in a psychiatric hospital's laboratory in China, focusing on how outdated information technology impacts the hospital's ability to respond to public health emergencies. The goal is to enhance the hospital's emergency response capabilities by updating risk assessments, biosafety manuals, and implementing a comprehensive quality management system alongside a specialized infection control system for significant respiratory diseases. Methods: We utilized an integrated research approach, expanding the scope of risk assessments, updating the biosafety manual according to the latest international standards, and implementing a quality management system. A specialized infection control system for significant respiratory diseases was introduced to improve emergency response capabilities. Results: Updated risk assessments and a new biosafety manual have significantly improved the identification and management of biosafety threats. Implementing new quality management and infection control systems has enhanced response efficiency and operational standardization. Conclusion: The measures taken have strengthened the biosafety management and emergency response capabilities of the laboratory department, highlighting the importance of information technology in biosafety management and recommending similar strategies for other institutions.

Occupational Therapy Assessment Tools for Children and Adolescents in Iran: A Scoping Review.

Background: Assessment tools are essential in occupational therapy for providing client-centered care, clinical decision-making, evidence-based documentation, and defining expected outcomes. This study investigated available occupational therapy assessment tools for children and adolescents in Iran. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed Central, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, SID, Magiran, and Google Scholar from their inception until May 24, 2022. Two reviewers screened records and applied inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed articles in English or Persian, covering children and adolescents aged 0-18 years old in Iran. The methodological quality of each study and the evidence quality of each measurement tool was assessed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) Risk of Bias Checklist, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: A review of 66 articles published between 2010 and 2021, identified 51 assessment tools. The majority of tools (70.7%) targeted typically developing children and those with cerebral palsy, with limited options for adolescents (n=5) and infants (n=1). These tools primarily focused on assessing body functions (47.06%), particularly sensory-motor functions. While numerous tools demonstrated good reliability (66.67%) and significant content validity (31.37%), there was a paucity of high-quality evidence supporting other psychometric properties. Conclusion: This study identified 51 occupational therapy assessment tools for Iranian children and adolescents. However, the present research identified some concerning trends, such as lack of tools available for specific populations, an overreliance on translated tools, and a predominant focus on body functions. Moreover, there were concerns about the methodological quality of studies using these tools.

Use of an ambient artificial intelligence tool to improve quality of clinical documentation.

Background: Electronic health records (EHRs) have contributed to increased workloads for clinicians. Ambient artificial intelligence (AI) tools offer potential solutions, aiming to streamline clinical documentation and alleviate cognitive strain on healthcare providers. Objective: To assess the clinical utility of an ambient AI tool in enhancing consultation experience and the completion of clinical documentation. Methods: Outpatient consultations were simulated with actors and clinicians, comparing the AI tool against standard EHR practices. Documentation was assessed by the Sheffield Assessment Instrument for Letters (SAIL). Clinician experience was measured through questionnaires and the NASA Task Load Index. Results: AI-produced documentation achieved higher SAIL scores, with consultations 26.3% shorter on average, without impacting patient interaction time. Clinicians reported an enhanced experience and reduced task load. Conclusions: The AI tool significantly improved documentation quality and operational efficiency in simulated consultations. Clinicians recognised its potential to improve note-taking processes, indicating promise for integration into healthcare practices.

Adherence to Evidence-Based Guidelines and Implications When Designing Electronic Documentation for Urinary Catheters.

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the point prevalence and the rate of adherence to evidence-based guidelines for patients who had indwelling urinary catheters in three Australian acute care hospitals. DESIGN: A cross-sectional observational design was used. METHODS: A multisite cross-sectional observational design was utilised in three acute hospitals across Australia. Data were collected from each site in a single day directly from observation of the patient, the bedside notes and medical records. The data collected included observations of clinical care and scrutiny of the documentation of the insertion details and catheter care using best practice guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 1730 patients audited, 47% were female. The mean point prevalence of catheters in situ across three sites was 12.9%. Correct documentation compliance was reported to be, on average, 40%. Documentation was significantly better when a template was available to guide information recorded: this was regardless of whether it was hard copy or electronic. Overall, clinical care compliance with best practices was 77%. Of note for improvement was the fixing of the urinary catheter to the thigh in highly dependent patients. CONCLUSION: It was identified that there is a need for improvement across all three sites: specifically regarding securement of the urinary catheter to the patient's thigh within the ICU. In addition, it was identified that there is a need for documentation of the urine bag change in ward areas. Documentation may be improved by incorporating templates into healthcare documentation systems in the future. Further work is needed to ensure nurses are aware of the adverse effects of urinary catheters and thus, the need to adhere to best practice guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: There has been no patient or public contribution. REPORTING METHOD: We have adhered to the STROBE guidelines for reporting.

Improving Blood Transfusion Request Form Documentation: A Quality Improvement Project.

BACKGROUND: The transfusion quality improvement project (QIP) serves as a valuable tool for assessing and educating individuals who request blood components. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that each institution utilize a blood transfusion request form to ensure the effective conveyance of patient information to the hospital's blood bank. This QIP aimed to implement a transfusion request form and measure compliance with its use. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted at Al Managil Teaching Hospital, Sudan, from May 1 to August 3, 2024, to address the lack of standardized transfusion request forms. The study included three cycles involving pre-intervention analysis, two phases of intervention with training sessions, and post-intervention evaluations. The interventions focused on developing and implementing a new transfusion request form, training clinical physicians, and reinforcing the form's use. Data from 100 randomly selected transfusion request forms were analyzed for completeness and adherence. RESULTS: The study showed significant improvements in the completeness of transfusion request forms across three cycles. In the first cycle, no data were collected, highlighting the absence of standardized forms. During the second cycle, with the introduction of the new form, the completion rates varied: some fields, such as patient information and clinical details, were fully completed in 50 cases (100%), while critical clinical parameters, such as current hemoglobin (Hb) and platelet (PLT) levels, were completed in only four requests (8%). By the third cycle, there was a substantial increase in completion rates across all domains. For example, patient information fields achieved 100% completion in 50 cases, and clinical parameters saw significant improvement, with current Hb and PLT levels documented in 48 cases (96%). The mean percentage completion increased from 68.1% in the second cycle to 97.9% in the third cycle, demonstrating the effectiveness of the interventions and training sessions. Minor decreases were observed in health insurance documentation and certain clinical details, indicating areas for further improvement. CONCLUSION: The systematic implementation and iterative evaluation of transfusion request forms significantly enhanced documentation completeness.

A Study at Wad Madani, Sudan: Are We Documenting Acute Ankle Fractures Effectively?

BACKGROUND: Medical records are essential documents that outline a patient's medical history and current health status. It involves maintaining records that include assessments of patient outcomes, care plans, and interventions necessary to meet patient needs. A patient's medical record encompasses details about their condition, as documented by healthcare professionals, including clinical assessments, evaluations, and professional opinions related to the delivery of care. METHODS:  This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the adequacy of our documentation for acute ankle fractures in accordance with the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidelines, encompassing a total of 41 cases. The research was conducted at the Gezira Center for Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (GCOST) in Wad Madani, Sudan, from May 12 to July 12, 2022. RESULTS: Of the 41 recorded notes for acute ankle fractures, 26 (63.4%) were documented by medical officers and 15 (36.6%) by orthopaedic trainees. Most fractures (25 cases, 61%) occurred in individuals aged 18-40 years, and the gender distribution showed that males accounted for most fractures, with 29 cases (70.7%). Additionally, all patients (100%) had a documented cause of injury. Skin integrity was noted in 38 patients (92.7%). Vascular examination was documented in 18 patients (43.9%), while neurological examination was recorded in 16 patients (39%). CONCLUSION: Although the cause of ankle fractures was reported in all patients, the neurovascular examination was insufficiently documented, compromising patient care and failing to meet national standards, as highlighted in our study. We recommend implementing the BOAST guidelines to ensure proper documentation and essential assessments.

Assessment of the quality of oral squamous cell carcinoma clinical records in oral surgery with Surgical Tool for Auditing Records (STAR) scoring.

BACKGROUND: The Surgical Tool for Auditing Records scoring system [STAR] focuses on surgical record auditing with promising outcomes. It offers a structured approach to evaluating the quality of surgical notes. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the STAR in evaluating oral surgical records and identifying areas for improvement in documentation practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data was obtained from the Dental Information Archival Software (DIAS) of our institution. The sample size was determined using G*Power 3.1.9.4 software. Fifty consecutive oral surgery clinical records of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients were evaluated using STAR. Each record was reviewed for adherence to documentation standards including Initial Assessment (10 points), Follow-up Entries (8 points), Consent Documentation (7 points), Anesthesia Report (7 points), Surgical Log (9 points), and Discharge Synopsis (9 points). compiling a total STAR score (50 points). The data was tabulated in Google Sheets. The descriptive statistics with inter-observer agreement and the mean score were recorded. RESULTS: We observed that each of the 50 records received a score of 49/50 points on the STAR. Deductions were necessary in the Operative record section due to the lack of information regarding the sutures used. CONCLUSION: To summarize, this study emphasizes the effectiveness of the STAR scoring system in evaluating the quality of oral surgical records. Identifying deficiencies, particularly in documenting operative details, can improve the completeness and accuracy of patient records. It can ultimately enhance patient care and facilitate better communication among healthcare professionals.

Electronic nursing documentation for patient safety, quality of nursing care, and documentation: a systematic review .

Objective: To evaluate the impact of electronic nursing documentation on patient safety, quality of nursing care and documentation. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted in December 2022, and comprised a comprehensive search on Scopus, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Sage Journals and Google Scholar databases for English-language human studies published between 2018 and 2022. The key words used in the search included "Nursing", "care", "documentation", "record", "electronic", "process" and "health services". The risk of bias was assessed using Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology tool. RESULTS: Of the 469 items initially identified, 15(3.2%) were analysed in detail, indicating a positive influence of electronic nursing documentation on patient safety, care quality, and documentation. However, shortcomings were observed in the development of electronic nursing documentation for optimal effectiveness. Conclusion: Electronic nursing documentation significantly enhanced patient safety, care quality and documentation. To facilitate its integration into clinical settings, a standardised and logically structured electronic nursing documentation system is essential.

Impact of the I-DECIDED Tool to Improve Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Care in Paediatrics: Interrupted Time-Series Study.

AIM: To determine whether the I-DECIDED assessment and decision tool enhances peripheral intravenous catheter assessment, care and decision-making in paediatrics. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental, interrupted time-series study. METHODS: An interrupted time-series study was conducted in a paediatric inpatient unit at a public teaching hospital in Brazil. The participants were patients aged less than 15 years old with a peripheral intravenous catheter, and their parents or guardians. Data were collected between January and July 2023, encompassing six time points, three pre-intervention and three post-intervention. Evaluation data were based on the I-DECIDED tool, including idle devices, dressings, complications, patient/family awareness, hand hygiene, disinfection and documentation. RESULTS: We conducted 585 peripheral intravenous catheter observations, with 289 in the pre-intervention phase and 296 in the post-intervention phase, inserted in 65 hospitalised children, 30 in the pre-intervention phase and 35 in the post-intervention phase. After the intervention, reductions were observed in the number of idle catheters, substandard dressings and complications. Patients and family members reported an increase in device assessment, hand hygiene and peripheral intravenous catheter disinfection. Additionally, there was an increase in documentation of decision-making performed by nurses and nursing technicians/assistants. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the I-DECIDED assessment and decision tool in a paediatric unit significantly improved the assessment, care and decision-making regarding peripheral intravenous catheters. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Opportunity to enhance practice standards, elevate the quality of care provided to paediatric patients, contribute to improved patient outcomes, advance evidence-based practice in vascular access management and enhance patient experience through increased involvement in care. IMPACT: To influence clinical practice and healthcare policies aimed at improving peripheral intravenous catheter care and patient safety in paediatric settings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution to the design of this study.

Application of AI in the creation of discharge summaries in psychiatric clinics.

BACKGROUND: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI; ChatGPT 4.0) into medical workflows presents a great potential to enhance efficiency and quality. The use of artificial intelligence in the creation of discharge summaries seems particularly interesting and valid. The course of each hospitalization is described in the discharge summary, which is given to each patient and then to his general practitioner at the end of hospital treatment. An exploratory analysis of discharge summaries in psychiatric clinics underscores that these documents must fulfill diverse and specific requirements. Nevertheless, AI-generated discharge summaries offer the opportunity to optimize information transfer and alleviate the workload on physicians. METHOD: The study evaluates the quality of discharge summaries produced by clinical staff and by an AI model (ChatGPT 4.0). The clinicians involved in writing of the discharge summaries were not informed about the study's purpose or methodology. The completed summaries were subsequently assessed by four attending physicians using predefined criteria. These physicians were also blinded to the study's objectives and were unaware of the individual authors of the summaries. The evaluation criteria included consistency, completeness, and comprehensibility. Additionally, the time required to prepare these summaries and its impact on overall quality were analyzed. RESULTS: The results of the study indicate that discharge summaries generated by AI are more efficient than discharge summaries prepared by clinic staff. The AI was particularly effective in terms of coherence and information structure. CONCLUSION: Further research, training and development is needed to improve the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated discharge summaries.

Detecting refactoring type of software commit messages based on ensemble machine learning algorithms.

Refactoring is a well-established topic in contemporary software engineering, focusing on enhancing software's structural design without altering its external behavior. Commit messages play a vital role in tracking changes to the codebase. However, determining the exact refactoring required in the code can be challenging due to various refactoring types. Prior studies have attempted to classify refactoring documentation by type, achieving acceptable results in accuracy, precision, recall, F1-Score, and other performance metrics. Nevertheless, there is room for improvement. To address this, we propose a novel approach using four ensemble Machine Learning algorithms to detect refactoring types. Our experimentation utilized a dataset containing 573 commits, with text cleaning and preprocessing applied to address data imbalances. Various techniques, including hyperparameter optimization, feature engineering with TF-IDF and bag-of-words, and binary transformation using one-vs-one and one-vs-rest classifiers, were employed to enhance accuracy. Results indicate that the experiment involving feature engineering using the TF-IDF technique outperformed other methods. Notably, the XGBoost algorithm with the same technique achieved superior performance across all metrics, attaining 100% accuracy. Moreover, our results surpass the current state-of-the-art performance using the same dataset. Our proposed approach bears significant implications for software engineering, particularly in enhancing the internal quality of software.

Seismic analysis of Islamic Egyptian minarets through 3D scanning and dynamic simulation.

Recently, Egypt had seismic activity. These seismic events have affected the stability of minarets, especially historical ones. Weight is one of the minaret's main stability factors. The main objective of the current research is to perform a three-dimensional (3D) assessment of an existing minaret, determine its accurate spatial model, document its current condition, examine its stability in the event of earthquakes, and identify the requisite measures to safeguard the minaret from any potential damage. The masonry to construct the minaret was used by extracting and examining specimens of this substance to determine its physical characteristics. The current work created three-dimensional models of the Abou-Ghanam El-Bialy minaret using a terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) to document its current condition, as well as minaret was subjected to a free vibration analysis using 3D finite element modeling. Finally, the minaret's seismic behavior was assessed utilizing mode forms, base responses, and normal stresses. The surveying method effectively documented the Minarets' existing case. The 3D seismic analysis showed that the minaret responded dynamically to earthquake loading, with mode shapes, base reactions, and normal stresses being crucial characteristics. Based on these data, we may suggest procedures to protect the minaret during seismic events.

A National Evaluation of Undergraduate Nursing and Midwifery Curricula.

AIM: To conduct a comprehensive review of Undergraduate Nursing and Midwifery Curricula leading to registration in Ireland. DESIGN: A mixed methods approach using a curriculum evaluation framework that was underpinned by the philosophy and principles of appreciative inquiry. METHODS: Five separate workstreams completed an evaluation of national policy documents and international curriculum documents, a literature review and two phases of stakeholder engagement including a graduate survey and peer-grouped stakeholder focus groups. The workstreams were emulated for the professions of nursing and midwifery. RESULTS: National policy indicates a significant shift in healthcare delivery to the community environment, with a strong focus on the social determinants of health and a flexible interprofessional workforce. International curricula review revealed that nursing and midwifery education was split equally between academia and clinical practice at bachelor's degree level. Graduates were assessed for clinical competence with a variance of four to seven domains of competence evident for nurses and five principles for midwives. Direct entry midwifery was not widely available. The graduate survey identified that students were satisfied with the academic components of the curriculum; however, significant challenges in clinical placement were reported. Stakeholder focus groups reported a need for a learner-focused approach to the curricula, increased access to education, a deeper understanding and appreciation of the various roles required to educate nurses and midwives and a recognition of midwifery as a separate profession. CONCLUSION: There is a need for a significant revision of the current nursing and midwifery curricula to meet the future healthcare needs of the diverse patient population with a community-focused delivery. REPORTING METHOD: The good reporting of a mixed methods study was used to guide the development of this manuscript. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: An Expert Advisory Group (EAG) was appointed to oversee the conduct of the research project and advise the research team as requested. There were five service user representatives included in the membership of the EAG. This included one representative from each of the divisions of the nursing and midwifery register in Ireland. A separate stakeholder engagement focus group was also conducted for the research upon the request from the service users.

Written Mobility Communication in Acute Care Medical Wards: An Observational Study of Physical Therapists' and Nurses' Documentation Practice.

OBJECTIVE: Low inpatient mobility is associated with poor hospital outcomes. Poor communication between clinicians has been identified as a barrier to improving mobility. Understanding how mobility is communicated within the multi-disciplinary team may help inform strategies to improve inpatient mobility. The aim of this study was to describe written mobility communication by physical therapists and nurses in acute care medical wards. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted across 4 hospitals in an Australian health service. A survey of physical therapists and nurses identified preferred sources and content of written mobility communication. An audit described and compared written mobility communication in the most strongly preferred documentation sources. Findings were described and compared graphically between discipline and site. RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by 85 physical therapists and 150 nurses. Twenty-two sources of documentation about mobility were identified. Preferences for sources and content varied between disciplines. Physical therapists nominated several preferred information sources and sought and documented broader mobility content. Nurses often sought nursing documents which focused on current mobility assistance and aids, with limited communication of mobility level or mobility goals. Audits of 104 patient records found that content varied between sources and sites, and content was variably missing or inconsistent between sources. CONCLUSION: Written mobility communication focused on mobility assistance and aids, rather than mobility levels or mobility goals, with poor completion and inconsistency within documentation. More complete and consistent documentation might improve progressive mobilization of hospital inpatients. IMPACT STATEMENT: Physical therapists and nurses seek and document different content in a wide range of locations, leading to incomplete and inconsistent written documentation.Understanding and resolving these practice differences offers potential to improve mobility communication and practice.

A Study in Wad Madani, Sudan: Are We Documenting Operation Notes Effectively?

BACKGROUND: Operative notes represent the critical record of a surgical procedure, encompassing comprehensive details encountered throughout the operation. Recognizing the importance of comprehensive documentation, the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) developed the Good Surgical Practice guidelines, which emphasize accurately recording every procedure and specifying the necessary parameters for each operative note. These guidelines help maintain high standards of surgical care and patient safety. METHODS: A retrospective review of 88 orthopaedic surgery operative notes for fracture neck of femurs was conducted at Gezira Centre for Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (GCOST) from March 12 to May 28, 2022. The review assessed 18 parameters against RCS guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 25.0; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY), which facilitated comprehensive data examination. RESULTS: In 37 cases (42.05%), the operation notes were written by a medical officer. In 29 cases (32.95%), an orthopaedic resident authored the notes. A specialist documented the notes in 21 cases (23.86%), and a consultant wrote the notes in one case (1.14%). Over 90% of the notes included surgeon and assistant names, procedure names, operative diagnoses, operative procedures, prosthesis details, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and antibiotic prophylaxis, and signatures. The name of the theatre anaesthetist, elective/emergency details, and additional procedures with reasons were absent in all notes. Less than 50% of the notes documented the time of the procedure, type of incision, operative findings, anticipated blood loss, closure technique specifics, and complications. CONCLUSION: The study emphasizes the shortcomings in the operating notes, underscoring the necessity for training initiatives to enhance the recording by medical officers and orthopaedic trainees. Implementing structured templates that adhere to RCS standards can improve the comprehensiveness and consistency of operating notes, effectively resolving existing discrepancies. Regular audits and feedback sessions are essential for identifying and rectifying persistent issues. It is recommended to arrange workshops and seminars to educate medical officials and trainees on the skills of efficient note-taking and thorough documentation procedures.

Electronic health record system use and documentation burden of acute and critical care nurse clinicians: a mixed-methods study.

OBJECTIVES: Examine electronic health record (EHR) use and factors contributing to documentation burden in acute and critical care nurses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mixed-methods design was used guided by Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Key EHR components included, Flowsheets, Medication Administration Records (MAR), Care Plan, Notes, and Navigators. We first identified 5 units with the highest documentation burden in 1 university hospital through EHR log file analyses. Four nurses per unit were recruited and engaged in interviews and surveys designed to examine their perceptions of ease of use and usefulness of the 5 EHR components. A combination of inductive/deductive coding was used for qualitative data analysis. RESULTS: Nurses acknowledged the importance of documentation for patient care, yet perceived the required documentation as burdensome with levels varying across the 5 components. Factors contributing to burden included non-EHR issues (patient-to-nurse staffing ratios; patient acuity; suboptimal time management) and EHR usability issues related to design/features. Flowsheets, Care Plan, and Navigators were found to be below acceptable usability and contributed to more burden compared to MAR and Notes. The most troublesome EHR usability issues were data redundancy, poor workflow navigation, and cumbersome data entry based on unit type. DISCUSSION: Overall, we used quantitative and qualitative data to highlight challenges with current nursing documentation features in the EHR that contribute to documentation burden. Differences in perceived usability across the EHR documentation components were driven by multiple factors, such as non-alignment with workflows and amount of duplication of prior data entries. Nurses offered several recommendations for improving the EHR, including minimizing redundant or excessive data entry requirements, providing visual cues (eg, clear error messages, highlighting areas where missing or incorrect information are), and integrating decision support. CONCLUSION: Our study generated evidence for nurse EHR use and specific documentation usability issues contributing to burden. Findings can inform the development of solutions for enhancing multi-component EHR usability that accommodates the unique workflow of nurses. Documentation strategies designed to improve nurse working conditions should include non-EHR factors as they also contribute to documentation burden.

Chaperone in breast examination: a comprehensive systematic review of patient and clinician perspectives, and documentation.

BACKGROUND: The General Medical Council (GMC) has made it mandatory to have a chaperone present during intimate examinations, including breast exams, highlighting the importance of medicolegal protection for both patients and clinicians. AIMS: The use of chaperones during breast examinations is logical, especially in an increasingly litigious society. This review aims to summarize current information regarding patients' and clinicians' perspectives on chaperone use in breast examination. METHODS: A PRISMA-compliant search was conducted in electronic databases from inception until April 2023 for qualitative literature on patients' and clinicians' perspectives on chaperone use in breast examination. The inclusion criteria focused on studies related to breast examinations, excluding other intimate examinations. An inductive thematic analysis was performed in three domains: physician-associated factors, patient-associated factors, and chaperone documentation. RESULTS: Ten studies were included after screening 939 articles. For breast examination, the presence of male and older surgeons, nurse availability, rural settings, and patients' psychiatric comorbidities increased the likelihood of chaperone use during consultations. Medico-legal concerns were prominent for male physicians, while female physicians highlighted the need for technical support. Logistical issues were a common hindrance. The gender of physicians was important for patients, but there was conflicting evidence regarding patient preferences for chaperones and their purpose. Poor documentation was generally observed despite quality improvement projects. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the vital role of chaperones in clinical practice, urging a precise definition and targeted resolution for implementation challenges. Patient preferences highlight the need for a personalized approach, and increased awareness among healthcare professionals is essential.

The OHStat guidelines for reporting observational studies and clinical trials in oral health research: manuscript checklist.

Adequate and transparent reporting is necessary for critically appraising published research, yet ample evidence suggests that the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of oral health research could be greatly improved. Accordingly, the Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research, statisticians and trialists from academia and industry, identified the minimum information needed to report and evaluate observational studies and clinical trials in oral health: the OHStat guidelines. Drafts were circulated to the editors of 85 oral health journals and to Task Force members and sponsors and discussed at a December 2020 workshop attended by 49 researchers. The guidelines were subsequently revised by the Task Force writing group. The guidelines draw heavily from the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT), Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology, and CONSORT harms guidelines, and incorporate the SAMPL guidelines for reporting statistics, the CLIP principles for documenting images, and the GRADE indicating the quality of evidence. The guidelines also recommend reporting estimates in clinically meaningful units using confidence intervals, rather than relying on P values. In addition, OHStat introduces seven new guidelines that concern the text itself, such as checking the congruence between abstract and text, structuring the discussion, and listing conclusions to make them more specific. OHStat does not replace other reporting guidelines; it incorporates those most relevant to dental research into a single document. Manuscripts using the OHStat guidelines will provide more information specific to oral health research.