Endovascular interventional treatment of patients with gastrointestinal bleeding after dual antiplatelet therapy: A case report.

Dual antiplatelet therapy is commonly used to treat or prevent thromboembolic events in patients with deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, atrial fibrillation, in patients after coronary artery stenting, cerebral artery stenting or artificial heart valves, etc. Although they significantly reduce the morbidity and mortality from thromboembolic events, dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with the risk of bleeding, which can be life-threatening. Gastrointestinal bleeding is one of the most common and dangerous events when using dual antiplatelet therapy for a long time. According to studies, nearly half of the major bleeding cases related to dual antiplatelet therapy arise from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. We report the case of a 74-year-old female patient with lower gastrointestinal bleeding after using dual antiplatelet therapy that was successfully treated endovascularly with a coil.

Dual antiplatelet therapy duration and stent type in patients with high bleeding risk: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) vary according to DAPT duration and stent type (e.g., durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DESs), biodegradable polymer DESs (BP-DESs), or polymer-free drug-coated stents (PF-DCSs)). We aimed to study the stent type and DAPT duration appropriate for patients with HBR. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched until October 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with HBR that compared standard DAPT (6-12 months) with DP- or BP-DES versus short DAPT (≤3 months) with DP- or BP-DES or PF-DCS or bare-metal stent (BMS) were identified. The primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included MI and stent thrombosis (ST). We performed a network meta-analysis using a random effects model. RESULTS: Thirteen RCTs with a total of 19,418 patients with HBR were included. Compared to standard DAPT with DP-DES, short DAPT with BMS was associated with a higher risk of MACE and MI. For major bleeding, short DAPT strategies were associated with a lower risk than standard DAPT strategies (e.g. short DAPT with DP-DES versus standard DAPT with DP-DES; HR[95% CI]: 0.48[0.28-0.82]). Interestingly, the use of BP-DES was associated with a higher risk of ST than DP-DES (e.g. standard DAPT with BP-DES versus short DAPT with DP-DES; HR[95% CI]: 2.65[1.03-6.79]). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HBR who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, a short DAPT strategy with DP-DES should be used since it offers the best combination of efficacy and safety.

Antiplatelet Strategy for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Optimal duration and choice of antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remain controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Digital databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase) were queried to select all randomized controlled trials on a post-percutaneous coronary intervention population with acute coronary syndrome. Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel for 12 months was compared with 4 major strategies: high-potency, high- to low-potency, low-dose, and short-duration DAPT. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare the safety and efficacy of different antiplatelet strategies. This study was the second updated manuscript under the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review registration (CRD42021286552). Thirty-two randomized controlled trials comprising 103 459 (51 750 experimental, 51 709 control) patients were included. Compared with DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel for 12 months, high- to low-potency DAPT (risk ratio [RR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.52-0.92]) and aspirin+prasugrel containing DAPT for 12 months (RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72-0.98]) had a significantly lower, whereas DAPT for 1 month followed by clopidogrel only (RR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.06-2.39]) had a higher, incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year (median follow-up). Prasugrel (RR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.09-1.66]) and ticagrelor (RR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.17-1.62]) containing DAPT for 12 months had significantly higher rates, whereas high- to low-potency DAPT (RR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.63-1.15]) had no significant risk of major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin and ticagrelor for 3 months, followed by aspirin and clopidogrel for the remaining duration, can be considered the optimal strategy for treating post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients with acute coronary syndrome because of a significantly reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events without increasing the risk of bleeding.

Optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy for minor stroke within 72 hours of symptom onset: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the potential spillover effect, the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy for minor stroke within 72 hours of symptom onset is still uncertain. METHODS: Safety and Efficacy of Aspirin-Clopidogrel in Acute Noncardiogenic Minor Ischemic Stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score≤5) is a prospective cohort study involving patients with minor ischaemic stroke within 72 hours of symptom onset. The DAPT group was further categorised into three subgroups: shorter duration (<10 days), short duration (10-21 days) and long duration (>21 days). The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were composite vascular event and severe bleeding during 90 days. RESULTS: Among 3061 eligible patients (age was 61.7±12.0 years, 73.3% were men, median (IQR) NIHSS score, 2 (1-3)), 2977 (97.4%) completed the follow-up. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) were administered in 61.0% and 39.0% of patients. Among them, 305 patients (16.8%) received a shorter duration of DAPT, 937 patients (51.7%) received a short duration and 572 patients (31.5%) received a long duration. In the propensity-weighted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, the use of DAPT in the short-duration group was associated with a lower risk of the primary vascular event outcome (HR (HR)=0.66, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.94, p=0.02) compared with SAPT group. The incidence of severe bleeding events at 90 days was similar. Similar findings were obtained from the propensity score-matching analysis. CONCLUSION: Short duration of DAPT (10-21 days) is superior to SAPT in minor stroke within 72 hours, reducing 90-day composite vascular events without increasing bleeding risk.

Evolution of antiplatelet therapy in Japan for the management of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease: a survey using data from an insurance claims data information service.

BACKGROUND: Non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke (NCIS) and ischemic heart disease (IHD) require secondary prevention with antiplatelet therapy (APT). We investigated APT prescription status for patients with NCIS and IHD. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective study utilized claims data from patients with NCIS and those who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for IHD and received antiplatelet drugs. The study included Phases A (2015-2016), B (2017-2018), and C (2019-2020). We evaluated patient characteristics, APT prescription rates (dual [DAPT] and single [SAPT]), and prescriptions by NCIS subtype. RESULTS: In the NCIS cohort, the initial DAPT prescription rate increased over time (Phase A: 14.9%, B: 19.2%, C: 28.0%), but decreased to 6% after 3 months. Subsequently, 25% of patients did not receive APT. For IHD, DAPT duration decreased over time, with 12-month prescription rates of 48.0%, 43.1%, and 32.6% for Phases A, B, and C, respectively. SAPT prescriptions, predominantly aspirin, increased, and use of P2Y12 inhibitors also rose. Few patients (10%) did not receive APT. CONCLUSIONS: Shorter DAPT duration/earlier switching to SAPT for NCIS and IHD have gained acceptance in regional medical care. A higher proportion of NCIS vs IHD patients did not receive APT in the chronic phase. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000052198.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy and Outcomes in Acute Mild to Moderate Stroke With Versus Without Large-Artery Atherosclerosis Post Hoc Analysis of ATAMIS.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the ATAMIS (Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Mild to Moderate Ischemic Stroke) trial to investigate whether the priority of clopidogrel plus aspirin to aspirin alone was consistent between patients with and without stroke pathogenesis of large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with stroke classification randomized to a clopidogrel-plus-aspirin group and aspirin-alone group in a modified intention-to-treat analysis set of ATAMIS were classified into LAA and non-LAA subtypes. The primary outcome was early neurologic deterioration at 7 days, defined as a >2-point increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score compared with baseline, and safety outcomes were bleeding events and intracranial hemorrhage. We compared treatment effects in each stroke subtype and investigated the interaction. Among 2910 patients, 225 were assigned into the LAA subtype (119 in the clopidogrel-plus-aspirin group and 106 in the aspirin-alone group) and 2685 into the non-LAA subtype (1380 in the clopidogrel-plus-aspirin group and 1305 in the aspirin-alone group). Median age was 66 years, and 35% were women. A lower proportion of early neurologic deterioration was found to be associated with dual antiplatelet therapy in the LAA subtype (adjusted risk difference, -10.4% [95% CI, -16.2% to -4.7%]; P=0.001) but not in the non-LAA subtype (adjusted risk difference, -1.4% [95% CI, -2.6% to 0.1%]; P=0.06). No significant interaction was found (P=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the non-LAA subtype, patients with stroke of the LAA subtype may get more benefit from dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin with respect to early neurologic deterioration at 7 days. REGISTRATION: URL: clinicaltrials.gov; UnIque identifier: NCT02869009.

Supporting appropriate use of extended dual antiplatelet therapy post-myocardial infarction based on an innovative 12-month ticagrelor virtual service.

Purpose: Extended dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ticagrelor and aspirin is recommended in selected cases after myocardial infarction (MI) but not widely deployed in practice. This study assessed an innovative, cardiology pharmacist-led virtual service for determining eligibility for extended DAPT among patients completing 12 months of initial DAPT in primary care following MI. Methods: Within this model, potentially eligible individuals are reviewed virtually by a cardiology pharmacist for suitability for extended DAPT with reduced-dose ticagrelor [60 mg twice daily (BD)] for up to 3 years. Eligibility is guided by the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial criteria (aged ≥50 years and having ≥1 high-risk feature for further ischaemic events). This is balanced against potential ineligibility driven primarily by bleeding risk, assessed using PRECISE-DAPT score. The final recommendation is sent to primary care to action. The present work is a retrospective evaluation of patients referred to the service between July 2018 and December 2021. Results: A total of 200 patients were included [n = 131 (65.5%) male; mean age: 69.4 ± 9.5 years]. Of these, 79 (39.5%) were recommended for extended DAPT based on the balance of risks for further ischaemic events vs. bleeding. Sixty-three patients on high-dose DAPT (ticagrelor 90 mg BD)-which is inappropriate beyond 12 months-were reassigned to reduced-dose DAPT or aspirin monotherapy. Conclusions: This virtual clinic played a key role in medicines optimisation, enabling appropriate patients to benefit from extended DAPT while offsetting bleeding risk. The model could be adapted locally for use elsewhere.

Ticagrelor monotherapy after ≤ 1-month DAPT vs continued DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend at least 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, DAPT prolonged use may increase the risk of bleeding complications. Therefore, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis to assess whether ticagrelor monotherapy after ≤1 month of DAPT improves clinical outcomes compared with continued DATP in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients post-PCI. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials published up to August 2024. All-cause and cardiovascular death, overall and major bleeding events, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stent thrombosis within 1-2 years post-procedure were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.1.7. RESULTS: Three studies and 13,737 patients were included, of whom 6861 (49.95 %) received ticagrelor alone. When compared with DAPT, ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced the risk of overall (2.0 % vs 4.5 %; RR 0.44; 95 % Cl 0.33-0,59; p < 0.00001) and major (1.4 % vs 2.5 %; RR 0.49; 95 % Cl 0.29-0.83; p = 0.04) bleeding events. Both antiplatelet regimens had similar rates of mortality, MI, stroke, TVR or stent thrombosis. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that ticagrelor alone after ≤1 month of DAPT post-PCI in ACS patients reduces bleeding complications without increasing major adverse events compared with traditional DAPT for 12 months.

Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: 6 versus 12 Months.

Background/Objectives: For patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of an unprotected left main coronary artery (uLMCA) stenosis, the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of 6- versus 12-month DAPT duration in patients with PCI of an uLMCA and stable angina. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we included consecutive patients of our centre who underwent PCI of uLMCA stenosis for stable angina and who received DAPT with acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel for either 6 or 12 months. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at one year. Secondary endpoints included individual components of the primary endpoint, definite/probable stent thrombosis, and bleeding. Clinical outcomes were assessed by unadjusted analysis and by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Results: Out of 984 included patients, 339 (34.5%) received DAPT for 6 months and 645 (65.5%) for 12 months. The primary endpoint occurred in 51 patients (15.2%) in the 6-month group and in 104 (16.3%) in the 12-month group (p = 0.674). Incidences of stent thrombosis (0.9% versus 0.3%, p = 0.224) and BARC 3,4,5 bleeding (6% versus 5.8%, p = 0.808) were also comparable in both groups. We found no significant differences in the primary endpoint and its components or BARC 3,4,5 bleeding between 6 and 12 months. Conclusions: Our findings do not support the extension of DAPT beyond 6 months after PCI for uLMCA in patients with stable angina.

Predicting Individual Treatment Effects to Determine Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Stent Implantation.

BACKGROUND: After coronary stent implantation, prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) increases bleeding risk, requiring personalization of DAPT duration. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning model to predict optimal DAPT duration after contemporary drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: The One-Month DAPT, RESET (Real Safety and Efficacy of 3-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation), and IVUS-XPL (Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesion) trials provided a derivation cohort (n=6568). Using the X-learner approach, an individualized DAPT score was developed to determine the therapeutic benefit of abbreviated (1-6 months) versus standard (12-month) DAPT using various predictors. The primary outcome was major bleeding; the secondary outcomes included 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and 1-year net adverse clinical events. The risk reduction with abbreviated DAPT (3 months) in the individualized DAPT-determined higher predicted benefit group was validated in the TICO (Ticagrelor Monotherapy After 3 Months in the Patients Treated With New Generation Sirolimus-Eluting Stent for Acute Coronary Syndrome) trial (n=3056), which enrolled patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with ticagrelor. The validation cohort comprised 1527 abbreviated and 1529 standard DAPT cases. Major bleeding occurred in 25 (1.7%) and 45 (3.0%) patients in the abbreviated and standard DAPT groups, respectively. The individualized DAPT score identified 2582 (84.5%) participants who would benefit from abbreviated DAPT, which was significantly associated with a lower major bleeding risk (absolute risk difference [ARD], 1.26 [95% CI, 0.15-2.36]) and net adverse clinical events (ARD, 1.59 [95% CI, 0.07-3.10]) but not major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (ARD, 0.63 [95% CI, -0.34 to 1.61]), compared with standard DAPT in the higher predicted benefit group. Abbreviated DAPT had no significant difference in clinical outcomes of major bleeding (ARD, 1.49 [95% CI, -1.74 to 4.72]), net adverse clinical events (ARD, 2.57 [95% CI, -1.85 to 6.99]), or major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (ARD, 1.54 [95% CI, -1.26 to 4.34]), compared with standard DAPT in the individualized DAPT-determined lower predicted benefit group. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning using the X-learner approach identifies patients with acute coronary syndrome who may benefit from abbreviated DAPT after drug-eluting stent implantation, laying the groundwork for personalized antiplatelet therapy.

Abbreviated ticagrelor based dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Few randomized clinical trials have evaluated the safety and efficacy of abbreviated ticagrelor based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS); however, these trials were underpowered to detect differences in hard clinical outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Scopus databases was performed through June 2024, for trials that compared abbreviated (≤3-months) versus standard 12-months ticagrelor based DAPT in ACS. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, ischemic stroke, and major bleeding. Endpoints were measured at 12-months after DAPT initiation. Data were pooled using random-effects model. Effect measure utilized was risk ratio (RR). Heterogeneity was assessed via Chi-squared and Higgin's I2 test. RevMan 5.0 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, United Kingdom) was utilized to perform statistical analysis. RESULTS: Five trials were included in this analysis with 21,407 patients assessed. ULTIMATE-DAPT, T-PASS, and GLOBAL LEADERS-ACS assessed 1-month DAPT duration while TICO and TWILIGHT-ACS assessed 3-months DAPT duration. The average age was 62.7 years and 22.7 % were women. ACS presentations included non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (40.1 %), unstable angina (35.2 %), and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (31.5 %). Abbreviated ticagrelor based DAPT was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.78; 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) 0.62-0.98, I2 = 0 %) compared with standard duration DAPT. There was no difference between groups in cardiovascular death (RR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.41-1.03, I2 = 0 %), myocardial infarction (RR 1.04; 95 % CI 0.85-1.27, I2 = 0 %), stent thrombosis (RR 0.97; 95 % CI 0.64-1.45, I2 = 0 %), or ischemic stroke (RR 0.90; 95 % CI 0.62-1.30, I2 = 0 %). Abbreviated DAPT was associated with lower risk of major bleeding (RR 0.50; 95 % CI 0.38-0.66, I2 = 46 %). CONCLUSION: Our analysis includes the totality of randomized data evaluating the merits of abbreviated ticagrelor based DAPT after ACS. The salient study finding was the observed reduced risk of all-cause mortality and major bleeding with abbreviated DAPT approach.

Real-World Implementation of a Genotype-Guided P2Y12 Inhibitor De-Escalation Strategy in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.

BACKGROUND: CYP2C19 genotype-guided de-escalation from ticagrelor or prasugrel to clopidogrel may optimize the balance between ischemic and bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare bleeding and ischemic event rates in genotyped patients vs standard care. METHODS: Since 2015, ACS patients in the multicenter FORCE-ACS (Future Optimal Research and Care Evaluation in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome) registry received standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Since 2021, genotype-guided P2Y12 inhibitor de-escalation was recommended at a single center, switching noncarriers of the loss-of-function allele CYP2C19∗3 or CYP2C19∗2 from ticagrelor or prasugrel to clopidogrel, whereas loss-of-function carriers remained on ticagrelor or prasugrel. The primary ischemic endpoint, a composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and the primary bleeding endpoint, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3, or 5 bleeding, were compared between a genotyped cohort and a cohort treated with standard DAPT after 1 year. RESULTS: Among 5,321 enrolled ACS patients, 406 underwent genotyping compared with 4,915 nongenotyped ACS patients on standard DAPT. In the genotyped cohort, 65.3% (n = 265) were noncarriers, 88.7% (n = 235) of whom were switched to clopidogrel. The primary ischemic endpoint occurred in 5.2% (n = 21) of patients in the genotyped cohort compared to 6.9% (n = 337) in the standard care cohort (adjusted HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.53-1.28). The primary bleeding rate was significantly lower in the genotyped cohort compared to the standard care cohort (4.7% vs 9.8%; adjusted HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.30-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a CYP2C19 genotype-guided P2Y12 inhibitor de-escalation strategy in a real-world ACS population resulted in lower bleeding rates without an increase in ischemic events compared to a standard DAPT regimen.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes.

The antithrombotic management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) involves a 6-month course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), followed by chronic aspirin therapy. In patients with a baseline indication for anticoagulation, a variable duration of triple antithrombotic therapy is administered, followed by dual antithrombotic therapy until the sixth month post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and ultimately a transition to chronic anticoagulation. However, advancements in stent technology reducing the risk of stent thrombosis and a growing focus on the impact of bleeding on prognosis have prompted the development of new therapeutic strategies. These strategies aim to enhance protection against ischemic events in the initial stages after PCI while mitigating the risk of bleeding in the long term. This article delineates the therapeutic strategies outlined in European and American guidelines for CCS management, with special attention to investigational strategies.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Early mechanical reperfusion, primarily via percutaneous coronary intervention, combined with timely antithrombotic drug administration, constitutes the main approach for managing acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Clinicians have access to a variety of antithrombotic agents, necessitating careful selection to balance reducing thrombotic events against increased bleeding risks. This review offers a comprehensive update on current antithrombotic therapy in ACS, emphasizing the need for individualized treatment strategies.

One-Month Duration Compared with Twelve-Month Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Elective Angioplasty for Coronary Artery Disease: Bleeding and Ischaemic Outcomes.

Background/Objectives: The need to determine the safest duration of dual antiplatelet therapy duration after elective angioplasty to reduce bleeding events without an adverse effect on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) remains a challenge. Methods: In this investigator-initiated, single-centre cohort study, we identified all patients who underwent PCI for de novo coronary disease for stable angina between January 2015 and November 2019. We compared 1-month and 12-month durations of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to determine if there was any difference in the primary outcome of major bleeding. The secondary outcome was a patient-oriented composite endpoint of all-cause mortality; any myocardial infarction, stroke, or revascularisation; and the individual components of this composite endpoint. Data were analysed using Cox regression models and cumulative hazard plots. Results: A total of 1025 patients were analysed, of which 340 received 1 month of DAPT and 685 received 12 months of DAPT. There was no difference in major bleeding between the two groups (2.6% vs. 2.5% respectively). On univariable cox regression analysis, no characteristics were predictors of major bleeding. A proportion of 99.7% of patients in the 1-month DAPT arm were treated with a DCB strategy, whilst 93% in the 12-month DAPT group were treated with a DES. There was no difference between the two groups with regards to the composite patient-oriented MACE (11% vs. 12%, respectively) or any individual component of this. These results were unchanged after propensity score matched analysis. Conclusions: A 1-month duration of DAPT, for which 99.7% of patients were treated with a DCB strategy, appears safe and effective when compared with a 12-month duration of DAPT with no difference in major bleeding or MACE.

Non-invasive recanalization of first-generation sirolimus-eluting stent thrombosis due to stent fracture and coronary artery aneurysm after clopidogrel treatment 15 years after implantation.

In 2020, a 48-year-old male patient was admitted to our hospital due to unstable angina. In 2005, three first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents (1st-SESs) had been deployed to his right coronary artery (RCA). Over the past 10 years or so, the patient has been treated with single antiplatelet therapy using aspirin. Coronary angiography (CAG) revealed severe stenosis in the left circumflex artery (LCx) and total occlusion at the proximal portion of the stented RCA. Furthermore, fluoroscopy showed multiple 1st-SES fractures. After ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention of the LCx, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was resumed by adding the P2Y12 inhibitor clopidogrel to aspirin. Two months later, CAG revealed complete recanalization and multiple peri-stent coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) in the RCA. Intravascular ultrasound revealed late-acquired stent malapposition (LSM) and formation of true aneurysms. Coronary angioscopy showed the uncovered struts of the 1st-SES and mural red thrombus. DAPT was continued thereafter, and 8 months later, follow-up CAG showed no significant RCA restenosis. To date, the patient remains free from cardiovascular events. This report documents a rare case of thrombotic occlusion of a 1st-SES with LSM, CAA, and stent fractures followed by non-invasive recanalization after clopidogrel treatment 15 years after 1st-SES implantation. Learning objective: Stent thrombosis due to stent fracture and coronary aneurysm can occur even years after first-generation sirolimus-eluting stent (1st-SES) implantation. Risk assessment using coronary imaging should be made and long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) should be recommended in patients with a high risk of stent thrombosis after 1st-SES implantation. In cases of stent thrombosis of the 1st-SES, resuming DAPT, including P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, may be a useful non-invasive treatment option.

Navigating Aspirin Hypersensitivity in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Aspirin hypersensitivity continues to be a major clinical challenge in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), particularly in those requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the absence of a validated alternative antiplatelet regimen. Although true aspirin allergies are uncommon, they can manifest with severe reactions such as angioedema or anaphylaxis, highlighting the critical role of diagnostic challenge tests and tolerance induction strategies. Here, a 61-year-old female with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis presented with new-onset heart failure and elevated troponins in the setting of a hypertensive emergency. A subsequent left heart catheterization revealed severe multivessel disease, but PCI was deferred due to her history suggestive of aspirin-induced angioedema and the absence of a known optimal approach in this scenario. Given the feasibility of completing a desensitization protocol, aspirin desensitization was pursued, facilitating the successful placement of a drug-eluting stent. This case highlights the need for validated protocols to manage aspirin hypersensitivity, as the current treatment paradigm necessitates a highly individualized approach by the treating clinician.

Early detection of resistance to dual antiplatelet therapy in patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention using the VerifyNow test and associated factors.

Resistance to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), including aspirin and clopidogrel, in patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) leads to the inability to prevent thrombotic complications. The present study aimed to evaluate early resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel in patients following PCI using the VerifyNow test and associated factors. A total of 50 patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) who underwent emergency PCI and received DAPT were recruited in the present study. The detection of resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel was performed using the VerifyNow system. Resistance to aspirin was determined with VerifyNow Aspirin >550 aspirin reaction units (ARU). Resistance to clopidogrel was determined with VerifyNow P2Y12 >208 P2Y12 reaction units (PRU). The resistance rate to aspirin was 14%, while the resistance rate to clopidogrel was higher, at 34%. There were 2 patients with resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel (4%). Univariable logistic regression analysis revealed that diabetes, the use of ß-blockers, and low levels of hemoglobin and hematocrit were associated with resistance to clopidogrel. Following multivariable logistic regression analysis, only the use of ß-blockers was truly associated with resistance to clopidogrel. On the whole, the results of the present study may also prove to be helpful in the selection of therapeutic drugs for patients undergoing PCI and who are diagnosed with ACS.

Aspirin-free P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review.

Background: A modified antiplatelet therapy approach after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), specifically reducing dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration and transitioning to P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, may offer advantages in terms of bleeding risk reduction. However, the impact of initiating aspirin-free P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy immediately after PCI is not yet fully understood. Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases until January 2024 for studies that examined the use of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy as a treatment approach without initial DAPT following PCI. Results: Four single-arm pilot prospective studies and 1 randomized controlled trial were included. In acute coronary syndrome patients with P2Y12 monotherapy following aspirin withdrawal immediately after PCI, the occurrence rates of the primary ischemic and bleeding endpoint were 2.91 % (8 out of 275 patients) and 1.09 % (3 out of 275 patients) respectively, whereas both the incidence rates of the primary ischemic and bleeding endpoints were 0.25 % (1 out of 407 patients) in individuals with stable coronary artery disease. In the STOPDAPT-3 trial comparing the effect of aspirin-free prasugrel monotherapy with standard DAPT after PCI, no differences were found in the primary ischemic or bleeding endpoints and most secondary outcomes (death, stroke, and myocardial infarction). However, there was an increased risk of coronary revascularization and stent thrombosis in the no-aspirin group. Conclusions: Single-arm studies suggest the safety and feasibility of aspirin-free P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy without initial DAPT after PCI in selected patients with acute coronary syndrome or stable coronary artery disease. However, the safety and efficacy of this aspirin-free approach compared with standard DAPT strategies following PCI still require further investigation.