"I think they should give primary health care a little more priority". The primary health care in Caribbean SIDS: what can be said about adaptation to the changing climate? The case of Dominica- a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Adaptation to climate change (CC) is a priority for Small Island Developing States (SIDS) in the Caribbean, as these countries and territories are particularly vulnerable to climate-related events. Primary health care (PHC) is an important contributor to CC adaptation. However, knowledge on how PHC is prepared for CC in Caribbean SIDS is very limited. The aim of this paper is to discuss health system adaptation to climate change, with a focus on PHC. METHODS: We explored the perspectives of PHC professionals in Dominica on PHC adaptation to climate change. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted in each of the seven health districts in Dominica, a Caribbean SIDS, between November 2021 and January 2022. The semi-structured interview guide was based on the Essential Public Health Functions: assessment, access to health care services, policy development and resource allocation. Data coding was organized accordingly. RESULTS: Findings suggest that health care providers perceive climate change as contributing to an increase in NCDs and mental health problems. Climate-related events create barriers to care and exacerbate the chronic deficiencies within the health system, especially in the absence of high-level policy support. Healthcare providers need to take a holistic view of health and act accordingly in terms of disease prevention and health promotion, epidemiological surveillance, and ensuring the widest possible access to healthcare, with a particular focus on the environmental and social determinants of vulnerability. CONCLUSION: The primary health care system is a key stakeholder in the design and operationalization of adaptation and transformative resilience. The Essential Public Health Functions should integrate social and climate and other environmental determinants of health to guide primary care activities to protect the health of communities. This study highlights the need for improved research on the linkages between climate events and health outcomes, surveillance, and development of plans informed by contextual knowledge in the SIDS.

[Digital transformation as a strategy to strengthen essential public health functions in the AmericasTransformação digital como estratégia de fortalecimento das funções essenciais de saúde pública nas Américas]. / La transformación digital como estrategia para el fortalecimiento de las funciones esenciales de salud pública en las Américas.

This article systematizes the main actions taken to address the essential public health functions (EPHF) in the context of the digital transformation of health systems. A narrative review was conducted, in which the conceptual framework of the renewed EPHF was linked to the eight guiding principles of the digital transformation of the health sector.In the selected publications, the main actions in digital transformation included electronic health records, telemedicine, digital health legislation, digital literacy, patient portals, open-source technologies, and data governance. These actions make it possible to increase the quality and efficiency of health systems, promote accessibility, and improve health outcomes.

Este artigo sistematiza as principais ações de transformação digital (TD) dos sistemas de saúde relacionadas às funções essenciais de saúde pública (FESP). Foi realizada uma revisão narrativa, inter-relacionando o marco conceitual das FESP renovadas com base nos os oito princípios orientadores da transformação digital do setor da saúde.Nas publicações selecionadas, constatou-se que as principais ações de TD incluem prontuários eletrônicos, telemedicina, legislação de saúde digital, letramento digital, portais para pacientes, tecnologias de código aberto e governança de dados. Essas ações permitem aumentar a qualidade e a eficiência dos sistemas de saúde, aprimorar a acessibilidade e melhorar os resultados de saúde.

Estudio piloto sobre la afectación de los servicios de las residencias medicalizadas de ancianos por efecto de la Covid-19 / Pilot study on the impact of COVID-19 on the services provided in nursing homes for the elderly

Objetivo: la COVID-19 ha azotado con virulencia a las residencias de ancianos en España. Los numerosos contagios y fallecimientos, la afectación sobre la salud física y mental de los profesionales o las medidas sanitarias de protección y prevención, han afectado a ciertos servicios fundamentales para los usuarios, empeorando su salud y calidad de vida. El presente estudio pretende identificar los servicios afectados por la pandemia, determinar el grado de afectación de los mismos y establecer posibles diferencias de opinión en función de los datos sociodemográficos y laborales de los profesionales respondientes. Método: muestreo intencional, 49 profesionales de dos residencias medicalizadas en Morón de la Frontera (Sevilla), metodología de encuesta, diseño cuasiexperimental y transversal, análisis descriptivos e inferenciales (contrastes de medias) con el programa SPSS. Resultados: muchos servicios se han visto afectados, aunque en distinto grado. En grado alto, las relaciones sociales y terapias ocupacionales; en grado medio, la salud física y mental, ABVD y educación social. En menor grado, AIVD y recursos sociales. Así mismo, no se hallaron diferencias significativas en las respuestas debidas al sexo, edad, formación, profesión o residencia (p-valor ≥.05 en todos los casos), mostrando así un alto grado de acuerdo en las opiniones de los profesionales. Conclusiones: numerosos servicios y rutinas, fundamentales para la calidad de vida de los usuarios, resultaron multi-afectados por efecto de la pandemia en ambos centros residenciales para personas mayores. (AU)

Objective: COVID-19 has hit nursing homes in Spain with virulence. The numerous infections and deaths, the impact on the physical and mental health of the professionals and the health protection and prevention measures have affected certain essential services for users, worsening their health and quality of life. The present study aims to identify the services affected by the pandemic, to determine the degree to which they have been affected and to establish possible differences of opinion according to the sociodemographic and occupational data of the responding professionals. Method: purposive sampling, 49 professionals from two medical residences in Morón de la Frontera (Seville), survey methodology, quasi-experimental and cross-sectional design, descriptive and inferential analysis (mean contrasts) with the SPSS program. Results: many services have been affected, albeit to varying degrees. To a high degree, social relations and occupational therapies; to a medium degree, physical and mental health, BADL and social education. To a lesser degree, IADL and social resources. Likewise, no significant differences were found in the responses due to sex, age, training, profession or residence (p-value ≥.05 in all cases), thus showing a high degree of agreement in the opinions of the professionals. Conclusions: numerous services and routines, fundamental to the quality of life of users, were multiply affected by the pandemic in both residential centers for the elderly. (AU)

Corrigendum: A novel approach to utilizing the essential public health functions in Ireland's health system recovery and reform.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1074356.].

A novel approach to utilizing the essential public health functions in Ireland's health system recovery and reform.

This article is part of the Research Topic 'Health Systems Recovery in the Context of COVID-19 and Protracted Conflict.' The COVID-19 pandemic presented a challenge to health systems and exposed weaknesses in public health capacities globally. As Ireland looks to recovery, strengthening public health capacities to support health systems resilience has been identified as a priority. The Essential Public Health Functions (EPHFs) provide an integrated approach to health systems strengthening with allied sectors and their operationalization supports health systems and multi-sectoral engagement to meet population needs and anticipate evolving demands. The Health Systems Resilience team (World Health Organization, HQ) in collaboration with the Department of Health (Ireland) developed a novel approach to the assessment of the EPHFs in Ireland. The approach involved a strategic and focused review of the delivery and consideration of EPHFs in relation to policy and planning, infrastructure, service delivery, coordination and integration, monitoring and evaluation and learning. Informed by a literature review and key document search, key stakeholder mapping and key informant interviews, lessons learned from experience with COVID-19 nationally and internationally, strengths as well as potential areas of improvement to optimize delivery of EPHFs were identified. Mapping of the EPHFs in Ireland revealed that there is evidence of delivery of all 12 EPHFs to varying degrees; however a number of challenges were identified, as well as numerous strengths and opportunities. Recommendations to optimize the delivery of EPHFs in Ireland include to integrate and coordinate EPHFs, increase the visibility of the public health agenda, leverage existing mechanisms, recognize and develop the workforce, and address issues with the Health Information System. There is a public health reform process currently underway in Ireland, with some of these recommendations already being addressed. The findings of this process can help further inform and support the reform process. Given the current focus on strengthening public health capacities globally, the findings in Ireland have applicability and relevance in other WHO regions and member states for health systems recovery and building back better, fairer and more resilient health systems.

La transformación digital como estrategia para el fortalecimiento de las funciones esenciales de salud pública en las Américas / Digital transformation as a strategy to strengthen essential public health functions in the Americas / Transformação digital como estratégia de fortalecimento das funções essenciais de saúde pública nas Américas

RESUMEN En el presente artículo se sistematizaron las principales acciones de transformación digital (TD) de los sistemas de salud que abordan a las funciones esenciales de la salud pública (FESP). Se realizó una revisión narrativa, donde se interrelacionó el marco conceptual de las funciones esenciales de la salud pública renovadas con los ocho principios rectores de la transformación digital del sector de la salud. En las publicaciones seleccionadas, se halló que las principales acciones de la TD comprenden la historia clínica electrónica, la telemedicina, la legislación en salud digital, la alfabetización digital, los portales del paciente, las tecnologías de código abierto y la gobernanza de datos. Estas acciones posibilitan aumentar la calidad y la eficiencia de los sistemas de salud, favorecer la accesibilidad y mejorar los resultados de salud.

ABSTRACT This article systematizes the main actions taken to address the essential public health functions (EPHF) in the context of the digital transformation of health systems. A narrative review was conducted, in which the conceptual framework of the renewed EPHF was linked to the eight guiding principles of the digital transformation of the health sector. In the selected publications, the main actions in digital transformation included electronic health records, telemedicine, digital health legislation, digital literacy, patient portals, open-source technologies, and data governance. These actions make it possible to increase the quality and efficiency of health systems, promote accessibility, and improve health outcomes.

RESUMO Este artigo sistematiza as principais ações de transformação digital (TD) dos sistemas de saúde relacionadas às funções essenciais de saúde pública (FESP). Foi realizada uma revisão narrativa, inter-relacionando o marco conceitual das FESP renovadas com base nos os oito princípios orientadores da transformação digital do setor da saúde. Nas publicações selecionadas, constatou-se que as principais ações de TD incluem prontuários eletrônicos, telemedicina, legislação de saúde digital, letramento digital, portais para pacientes, tecnologias de código aberto e governança de dados. Essas ações permitem aumentar a qualidade e a eficiência dos sistemas de saúde, aprimorar a acessibilidade e melhorar os resultados de saúde.

[Contributions of the new framework for essential public health functions to addressing the COVID-19 pandemicContribuições da nova estrutura para funções essenciais de saúde pública na resposta à pandemia de COVID-19]. / Aportes del nuevo marco para las funciones esenciales de salud pública a la lucha contra la pandemia de COVID-19.

This article uses a health stewardship perspective to interpret the strengths of and challenges to national health authorities' capacities to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic through the renewed essential public health functions (EPHF) framework. Based on a literature review, this article argues that the institutional capacities required by countries to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Americas included all four stages of the new EPHF policy cycle: assessment, policy development, allocation of resources and access. While health authorities provided these key functions (e.g. data analysis, intersectoral policy dialogues, allocation of additional funds), the interventions implemented depended on each 'country's own institutional structures. Health authorities faced significant challenges including fragmentation and the lack of institutional and personnel capacities, thus compromising the delivery of an effective and equitable response. In addition, the response to the pandemic has been uneven due to weaknesses in central leadership and coordination capacity, the politicization of the response and differences in the capacity to respond at subnational levels. Such challenges reflect structural weaknesses that existed prior to the onset of the pandemic, as well as the low prioritization of public health in agendas for health systems strengthening. A future agenda should prioritize improving structural elements while strengthening the stewardship capacities of health authorities and developing institutional structures that guarantee access to and universal coverage of health care.

Este artigo utiliza uma perspectiva de gestão de saúde para interpretar os pontos fortes e os desafios das capacidades das autoridades nacionais de saúde na resposta à pandemia de COVID-19, por meio da estrutura renovada das funções essenciais de saúde pública (FESP). Com base em uma revisão da literatura, este artigo argumenta que as capacidades institucionais requeridas pelos países para responder à pandemia de COVID-19 nas Américas incluíram todas as quatro etapas do novo ciclo de políticas das FESP: avaliação, formulação de políticas, alocação de recursos e acesso. Embora as autoridades de saúde tenham fornecido essas funções essenciais (por exemplo, análise de dados, diálogos intersetoriais de política, alocação de fundos adicionais), as intervenções implementadas dependiam das próprias estruturas institucionais de cada país. As autoridades de saúde enfrentaram desafios significativos, incluindo a fragmentação e a falta de capacidades institucionais e de pessoal, comprometendo, assim, uma resposta eficaz e equitativa. Além disso, a resposta à pandemia tem sido desigual em decorrência de pontos fracos na liderança central e na capacidade de coordenação, da politização da resposta e de diferenças na capacidade de resposta nos níveis subnacionais. Tais desafios refletem as fragilidades estruturais que existiam antes do início da pandemia, bem como a baixa priorização da saúde pública nas agendas para o fortalecimento dos sistemas de saúde. Uma agenda futura deve priorizar a melhoria dos elementos estruturais, ao mesmo tempo em que fortalece as capacidades de gestão das autoridades de saúde e desenvolve estruturas institucionais que garantam o acesso à saúde e a cobertura universal de saúde.

La Agencia Estatal de Salud Pública: una oportunidad para el sistema de Salud Pública en España / Future National Public Health Agency: an opportunity for the public health system in Spain

La creación de un centro estatal de salud pública, con una dotación adecuada de recursos, permitirá afrontar los desafíos de la salud pública del presente y del futuro en España. Para ello, las funciones de esta futura institución, que se propone como Agencia Estatal, deben abordar, además de las necesidades habituales de organización de la salud pública, la conexión de estas con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible, coordinando una estrategia estatal que integre distintos actores de salud en una red generosa y cooperativa, y desarrollando una estrategia de comunicación en salud pública innovadora, referente y priorizada, entre otros aspectos. La falta de recursos, la relativa desconexión actual de las funciones esenciales de salud pública en el ámbito estatal y la inequidad en el desarrollo autonómico y municipal de estas propician el desarrollo del proyecto de la Agencia como una red de redes, tal como se defiende en este trabajo. Aportamos ideas para un proceso que confiamos en que será decisivo para la salud pública española del siglo XXI. (AU)

The creation of a national centre for public health, with adequate resources, will make it possible to face the public health challenges of the present and the future in our country. To this end, the proposed state agency, should hold functions based on advanced public health organizational schemes, while linking with the sustainable development goals. The coordination of a national public health strategy built on a collaborative network of networks would also be essential, as developing an innovative, benchmarked and prioritised public health communication strategy, among other tasks. The lack of resources, the current relative disconnection of essential public health functions at the state level, and the inequity in their development of these functions at the regional and municipal levels, favour the development of the agency project as a network of networks. In this paper we give ideas for a process that seems decisive for Spanish public health in the 21st century. (AU)

[Future National Public Health Agency: an opportunity for the public health system in Spain]. / La Agencia Estatal de Salud Pública: una oportunidad para el sistema de Salud Pública en España.

The creation of a national centre for public health, with adequate resources, will make it possible to face the public health challenges of the present and the future in our country. To this end, the proposed state agency, should hold functions based on advanced public health organizational schemes, while linking with the sustainable development goals. The coordination of a national public health strategy built on a collaborative network of networks would also be essential, as developing an innovative, benchmarked and prioritised public health communication strategy, among other tasks. The lack of resources, the current relative disconnection of essential public health functions at the state level, and the inequity in their development of these functions at the regional and municipal levels, favour the development of the agency project as a network of networks. In this paper we give ideas for a process that seems decisive for Spanish public health in the 21st century.

Towards applying the essential public health functions for building health systems resilience: A renewed list and key enablers for operationalization.

The COVID-19 pandemic, climate change-related events, protracted conflicts, economic stressors and other health challenges, call for strong public health orientation and leadership in health system strengthening and policies. Applying the essential public health functions (EPHFs) represents a holistic operational approach to public health, which is considered to be an integrated, sustainable, and cost-effective means for supporting universal health coverage, health security and improved population health and wellbeing. As a core component of the Primary Health Care (PHC) Operational Framework, EPHFs also support the continuum of health services from health promotion and protection, disease prevention to treatment, rehabilitation, and palliative services. Comprehensive delivery of EPHFs through PHC-oriented health systems with multisectoral participation is therefore vital to meet population health needs, tackle public health threats and build resilience. In this perspective, we present a renewed EPHF list consisting of twelve functions as a reference to foster country-level operationalisation, based on available authoritative lists and global practices. EPHFs are presented as a conceptual bridge between prevailing siloed efforts in health systems and allied sectors. We also highlight key enablers to support effective implementation of EPHFs, including high-level political commitment, clear national structures for institutional stewardship on EPHFs, multisectoral accountability and systematic assessment. As countries seek to transform health systems in the context of recovery from COVID-19 and other public health emergencies, the renewed EPHF list and enablers can inform public health reform, PHC strengthening, and more integrated recovery efforts to build resilient health systems capable of managing complex health challenges for all people.

Identifying the Gaps Between Public Health Training and Practice: A Workforce Competencies Comparative Analysis.

Objectives: The study aimed to generate insights on how best to enhance the compatibility between Public Health training program competencies and the implementation of competencies required by employers to address current and emerging public health needs. Methods: A survey adapted from the WHO-ASPHER Competency Framework for the Public Health Workforce was conducted online among Israeli public health managers from August to November 2021. The survey was formulated to mirror Essential Public Health Operations. Forty-nine managers participated (37.6% response rate) in an assessment of 44 public health competencies and the core organizational public health operations. Results: Analysis of Essential Public Health Operations revealed a notably high deficiency reported for Advocacy Communication and Social Mobilization for health competencies. Collaborations and Partnership and, Leadership and System Thinking were the most reported insufficient competencies, particularly in health departments and research institutes. Governmental offices reported Organizational Literacy and Adaptability competencies being deficient. Deficiencies were more impactful as the level of expertise increased. Conclusion: There is a clear need for public health professionals to acquire versatile and innovative competencies in response to the ever-changing health threats.

The impact of public health interventions in a developing nation: an overview

Introduction: Around 80% of factors that determine population health sit outside the control of health services. It is essential we influence these factors in addition to those within the remit of health services in order to improve and protect the health of population in a developing country. Public health functions encompass working across the domains that constitute population health systems with various partners. The objective of this article is to give an overview of public health interventions that can improve the health of the population of a developing nation. Method: A descriptive study, based on a review of the literature of key public health frameworks and interventions that are likely to have significant impacts on population health. Some selected public health interventions and case studies are highlighted to illustrate the importance of priority areas in developing countries. Results: Various public health frameworks recognise the importance of wider determinants of health (socio-economic factors), effective healthcare, healthy behaviours, working with communities as critical to securing population health. Another framework adopts a life-course model of intervention starting from public health interventions during preconception period and childhood, adolescence, working life and older age. For many developing countries, the author identified some examples of priority areas for interventions such as stopping and preventing wars; improving child health, including free school meals; achieving universal healthcare through integrated primary health care; addressing commercial determinants of health; embracing new technologies; and measuring and monitoring population health. Conclusion: In order to improve the health of a population in a developing country, attention needs to go beyond health services to influence the wider determinants of health, health behaviours and adopting the World Health Organisation's roadmap on essential public health functions.

Aportes del nuevo marco para las funciones esenciales de salud pública a la lucha contra la pandemia de COVID-19 / Contributions of the new framework for essential public health functions to addressing the COVID-19 pandemic / Contribuições da nova estrutura para funções essenciais de saúde pública na resposta à pandemia de COVID-19

RESUMEN En el presente artículo se utiliza una perspectiva de rectoría de la salud, con el fin de interpretar las fortalezas y los obstáculos relativos a las capacidades de las autoridades nacionales de salud para responder ante la pandemia de COVID-19, a través del marco renovado de las funciones esenciales de salud pública (FESP). Sobre la base de una revisión bibliográfica, se sostiene que las capacidades institucionales que necesitan los países de la Región de las Américas para responder ante la pandemia de COVID-19 incluyen las cuatro etapas del nuevo ciclo de políticas en las FESP: la evaluación, la formulación de políticas, la asignación de recursos y el acceso. Aunque las autoridades de salud proporcionaron las funciones esenciales (por ejemplo, análisis de datos, diálogos intersectoriales en materia de políticas y asignación de fondos adicionales), las intervenciones que se implementaron estuvieron sujetas a las estructuras institucionales de cada país. Las autoridades de salud tuvieron que hacer frente a desafíos considerables como la fragmentación y la falta de capacidades institucionales y de personal, lo que pone en peligro la ejecución de actividades de respuesta eficaces y equitativas. Además, la respuesta a la pandemia ha sido desigual debido a algunas debilidades en la capacidad central de liderazgo y coordinación, la politización de las actividades de respuesta y las diferencias en la capacidad de respuesta a nivel subnacional. Esos desafíos son el reflejo de deficiencias estructurales que ya existían antes de que comenzara la pandemia, así como de la asignación de una prioridad baja a la salud pública en la agenda para el fortalecimiento de los sistemas de salud. En las agendas que se elaboren en el futuro debe darse prioridad a mejorar los elementos estructurales, fortalecer las capacidades de rectoría de las autoridades de salud y crear estructuras institucionales que garanticen tanto el acceso universal a la atención de salud como la cobertura universal de salud.

RESUMEN This article uses a health stewardship perspective to interpret the strengths of and challenges to national health authorities' capacities to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic through the renewed essential public health functions (EPHF) framework. Based on a literature review, this article argues that the institutional capacities required by countries to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Americas included all four stages of the new EPHF policy cycle: assessment, policy development, allocation of resources and access. While health authorities provided these key functions (e.g. data analysis, intersectoral policy dialogues, allocation of additional funds), the interventions implemented depended on each 'country's own institutional structures. Health authorities faced significant challenges including fragmentation and the lack of institutional and personnel capacities, thus compromising the delivery of an effective and equitable response. In addition, the response to the pandemic has been uneven due to weaknesses in central leadership and coordination capacity, the politicization of the response and differences in the capacity to respond at subnational levels. Such challenges reflect structural weaknesses that existed prior to the onset of the pandemic, as well as the low prioritization of public health in agendas for health systems strengthening. A future agenda should prioritize improving structural elements while strengthening the stewardship capacities of health authorities and developing institutional structures that guarantee access to and universal coverage of health care.

RESUMO Este artigo utiliza uma perspectiva de gestão de saúde para interpretar os pontos fortes e os desafios das capacidades das autoridades nacionais de saúde na resposta à pandemia de COVID-19, por meio da estrutura renovada das funções essenciais de saúde pública (FESP). Com base em uma revisão da literatura, este artigo argumenta que as capacidades institucionais requeridas pelos países para responder à pandemia de COVID-19 nas Américas incluíram todas as quatro etapas do novo ciclo de políticas das FESP: avaliação, formulação de políticas, alocação de recursos e acesso. Embora as autoridades de saúde tenham fornecido essas funções essenciais (por exemplo, análise de dados, diálogos intersetoriais de política, alocação de fundos adicionais), as intervenções implementadas dependiam das próprias estruturas institucionais de cada país. As autoridades de saúde enfrentaram desafios significativos, incluindo a fragmentação e a falta de capacidades institucionais e de pessoal, comprometendo, assim, uma resposta eficaz e equitativa. Além disso, a resposta à pandemia tem sido desigual em decorrência de pontos fracos na liderança central e na capacidade de coordenação, da politização da resposta e de diferenças na capacidade de resposta nos níveis subnacionais. Tais desafios refletem as fragilidades estruturais que existiam antes do início da pandemia, bem como a baixa priorização da saúde pública nas agendas para o fortalecimento dos sistemas de saúde. Uma agenda futura deve priorizar a melhoria dos elementos estruturais, ao mesmo tempo em que fortalece as capacidades de gestão das autoridades de saúde e desenvolve estruturas institucionais que garantam o acesso à saúde e a cobertura universal de saúde.

[Impact of COVID-19 on the provision of essential health services in Paraguay]. / Impacto de la COVID-19 en la prestación de los servicios de salud esenciales en Paraguay.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the magnitude of the impact of the current COVID-19 pandemic on the delivery of essential health services at all levels of care in Paraguay. METHODS: Descriptive and cross-sectional observational research. Indicators of services of the Ministry of Public Health and Social Welfare monitored in the country were analyzed. To compare the behavior of these indicators over time, data from the first four months (January-April) of 2017-2020 were used. To calculate the impact on each indicator, the same four-month period of 2019 and 2020 was compared, and the percentages of increase or decrease between these years were calculated. RESULTS: Since 2017, the number of visits has increased for all indicators; however, in 2020 visits related to almost all indicators have decreased to a variable degree. The most affected indicators (more than 30% decrease) were visits for digestive, hemolymphopoietic and ocular conditions. The number of visits related to the indicators control of diabetes mellitus and health control in children under 5 years increased 10.5% and 3.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Health care related to essential services has been affected by the pandemic with a reduction of visits for non-COVID-19 causes, which should serve as an alert for the health system in order not to lose the ground gained on this front.

A renewed framework for the essential public health functions in the Americas.

This report presents the results of a consensus decision making process conducted to elaborate a renewed conceptual framework of the essential public health functions for the Americas. The emerging framework consists of four pillars encompassing action-oriented components relating to the new scope and concerns of public health. The four pillars call for adopting a human rights approach to public health, addressing the social determinants of health, ensuring access to both individuals and population-based services, and expanding the stewardship role of health authorities through a collaborative implementation of public health functions. Public health functions were conceptualized as a set of capacities that are part of an integrated policy cycle the encompasses four stages: assessment, policy development, allocation of resources, and access. The framework provides a road map for evaluation and development by health authorities of integrated enabling public health policies through intersectoral collaboration. The application of the framework would require engaging countries working to improve public health through national assessments and systematic incorporation of these findings into quality improvement efforts and sectoral and intersectoral decision-making processes around policy and investments priorities promoted by governments. Work is ongoing in the definition of a list of public health functions that gives operational clarity to each dimension of this framework and guides performance evaluation.

En este informe se presentan los resultados de un proceso de toma de decisiones por consenso realizado para elaborar un marco conceptual renovado de las funciones esenciales de salud pública para las Américas. El marco resultante consta de cuatro pilares que abarcan componentes orientados a la acción relacionados con el nuevo alcance y las nuevas preocupaciones de la salud pública. Los cuatro pilares exigen la adopción de un enfoque de la salud pública basado en los derechos humanos, el abordaje de los determinantes sociales de la salud, la garantía de acceso a los servicios de salud tanto a nivel individual como de la población, y la ampliación de la función de rectoría de las autoridades sanitarias mediante una aplicación colaborativa de las funciones de salud pública. Las funciones de salud pública se conceptualizaron como un conjunto de capacidades que forman parte de un ciclo integrado de políticas que comprende cuatro etapas: evaluación, elaboración de políticas, asignación de recursos y acceso. El marco proporciona una hoja de ruta para la evaluación y el desarrollo por parte de las autoridades sanitarias de políticas de salud pública integradas y habilitantes mediante la colaboración intersectorial. La aplicación del marco exigiría el compromiso de los países para mejorar la salud pública mediante evaluaciones nacionales y la incorporación sistemática de sus conclusiones en las actividades de mejoramiento de la calidad y en los procesos de toma de decisiones sectoriales e intersectoriales acerca de las prioridades en materia de políticas e inversiones promovidas por los gobiernos. Se está trabajando en la definición de una lista de funciones de salud pública que dé claridad operacional a cada dimensión de este marco y oriente la evaluación de su desempeño.

Internacionalización en el desarrollo de Recursos Humanos a Nivel de Posgrado en Salud Pública en Meso América / Internacionalization of Human Resources development at Posdegree level on Public Health in Meso American Region

Desde 1982 hasta 2017, el CIESUNAN Managua ha entregado a la Región Meso Americana um aproximado de 1532 Profesionales Graduados de Posgrado, donde el 64% son mujeres, y el resto varones. 930 son nicaragüenses (60.7%), y el resto son graduados de otros países de la Región Mesoamericana. Estos Graduados han aprobado uno o más de los cinco programas de Maestrías (Administración de la Salud y Epidemiología desde 1982, Salud Pública desde 1990, Economía de la Salud desde 2005 y Salud Ocupacional desde 2010). En el 2015 es abierto el Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias de la Salud. La Gestión Institucional basada en la Extensión Universitaria y la Internacionalización se constituyen en las bases imprescindibles de la Formación de Recursos Humanos en ambientes complejos y a veces hasta conflictivos. Es posible identificar diferentes momentos o kayros en los 35 años del CIES, y deducir las lecciones aprendidas en este proceso, condición necesaria para comprender y emprender los retos del futuro de la Educación de Posgrado en Salud Pública en función del impacto tecnológico y epistemológico que caracteriza a la determinación social de la Salud y la necesaria Intersectorialidad a construir en el marco de la Iniciativa Salud en Todas las Políticas y de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenibles. Se exploran los diferentes períodos (kayros) de desarrollo y las lecciones aprendidas en cada uno de ellos, especialmente en los aspectos relacionados con la internacionalización de estos procesos, las relaciones establecidas con los actores surgidos y los espacios abiertos en estos processos.

From 1982 to 2017, CIESUNAN Managua has delivered to the Mesoamerican Region approximately 1532 Graduate Graduates, where 64% are women. Among those graduates, 930 are Nicaraguans (60.7%), and the rest are graduates coming from other countries of the Mesoamerican Region. These Graduates have approved one or more of the five Master's programs (Health Administration and Epidemiology since 1982, Public Health since 1990, Health Economics since 2005 and Occupational Health since 2010). In 2015 the Doctorate Program in Health Sciences is opened. Institutional Management based on University Extensionand Internationalization constitute the essential bases of Human Resource Training in complex and sometimes even conflicting environments. It is possible to identify different moments or kayros in the 35 years of the CIES, and to deduce the lessons learned in this process, a necessary condition to understand and undertake the future challenges of Postgraduate Education in Public Health according to the technological and epistemological impact that characterizes to the social determination of Health and the necessary intersectorality to be built within the framework of the Health Initiative in All Policies and the Sustainable Development Goals. It explores the different development periods and lessons learned in each one of them, especially in the aspects related to the internationalization of these processes, the established relationships with the actors that have emerged and the open spaces in these processes

Determinación de las competencias profesionales del egresado de la Licenciatura en Salud Pública / Determination of the professional competences of the graduates in Public Health

Resumen Introducción En el Ejército y Fuerza Aérea Mexicanos (FAM) no hay estudios sobre las competencias del personal profesional que se dedica a la salud pública. Objetivo Determinar si el egresado de la Escuela Militar de Oficiales de Sanidad (EMOS) posee las competencias para realizar las FESP. Material y métodos Estudio observacional, transversal y analítico. Se determinó si los egresados de la EMOS poseían las competencias necesarias para desempeñar las FESP. Se estableció la diferencia estadística entre el grupo que sí las poseía y los que no (t de Student). La comparación de diferencia estadística entre la Licenciatura en Salud Pública y Urgencias Médicas versus Maestría y Curso Técnico Especializado se realizó con una Z de proporciones. Resultados El 53.52% de los egresados de la EMOS poseían las competencias profesionales para la realización de las FESP, con diferencia estadística entre los que las poseen y los que no (t de Student 0.015). Sí existe diferencia estadística entre la Maestría versus la Licenciatura en Salud Pública (z = -2.9226); no se encontró diferencia versus el Curso Técnico Especializado en Salud Pública (z = 0.01116). Conclusiones Los egresados de la EMOS no poseen las competencias para realizar las FESP.

Abstract Introduction In the Mexican Army and Air Force (FAM) there are no studies on the competences of professional personnel dedicated to public health. Objectives To determine if the graduates of the Military School of Health Officials (EMOS) have the competences to carry out the essential public health functions (EPHF). Material and methods Observational, transversal and analytical study. It was determined if the personnel graduated from the EMOS possessed the necessary competences to perform the EPHF. The statistical difference was established between the group that did possess them and those that did not (Student's t test). The comparison of statistical difference between the degree in Public Health and Medical Emergencies versus the Master's and Specialized Technical Course was made with a Z of proportions. Results 53.52% of the graduates of the EMOS had the professional competences for the realization of the EPHF, existing statistical difference between those who possessed them and those who did not (t Student 0.015). There was a statistical difference between the Master's degree and the Degree in Public Health (z = -2.9226); there was no difference versus the Specialized Technical Course in Public Health (z = 0.01116). Conclusions Graduates of the EMOS do not have the competences to carry out the EPHF.

Defining and Assessing Public Health Functions: A Global Analysis.

Given the broad scope and intersectoral nature of public health structures and practices, there are inherent difficulties in defining which services fall under the public health remit and in assessing their capacity and performance. The aim of this study is to analyze how public health functions and practice have been defined and operationalized in different countries and regions around the world, with a specific focus on assessment tools that have been developed to evaluate the performance of essential public health functions, services, and operations. Our review has identified nearly 100 countries that have carried out assessments, using diverse analytical and methodological approaches. The assessment processes have evolved quite differently according to administrative arrangements and resource availability, but some key contextual factors emerge that seem to favor policy-oriented follow-up. These include local ownership of the assessment process, policymakers' commitment to reform, and expert technical advice for implementation.