RESUMO
El propósito de este estudio fue diseñar y validar un instrumento para la evaluación del conocimiento declarativo y procedimental en un deporte de invasión como el baloncesto en el contexto escolar. En el proceso de validación participaron 15 jueces expertos. El instrumento estuvo formado por 34 ítems distribuidos en dos bloques, declarativo y procedimental. Responde al siguiente tipo de preguntas: ¿Qué es?, ¿Sirve para?, ¿Qué se consigue?, ¿Cuál es? y ¿Cómo se realiza? La validez de contenido se calculó mediante el coeficiente V de Aiken y sus intervalos de confianza. Para la consistencia interna se empleó el coeficiente α de Cronbach. Ninguna de las preguntas que componen el test de conocimiento declarativo y procedimental fue eliminada al superar el valor crítico exacto (V≥.74). La consistencia interna de las preguntas fue excelente (α=.95). Por tanto, el instrumento es válido y fiable para la evaluación del conocimiento en el baloncesto escolar. (AU)
The purpose of this study has been the design and validation of an instrument for the evaluation of declarative and procedural knowledge in an invasion sport such as basketball in the school context. 15 expert judges participated in the validation process. The instrument consisted of 34 items distributed in two blocks, declarative and procedural. Answers the following type of questions: Is it useful for?, What is it ?, What is achieved ?, Which one is it? In addition, how is it done? Content validity was calculated using Aiken's V coefficient and its confidence intervals. Cronbach's α coefficient was used for internal consistency. None of the questions that make up the declarative and procedural knowledge test were eliminated by exceeding the exact critical value (V≥.74). The internal consistency of the questions was excellent (α=.95). Therefore, the instrument is valid and reliable for the evaluation of knowledge in school basketball. (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Conhecimento , Basquetebol , Instituições Acadêmicas , Intervalos de ConfiançaRESUMO
The assessment of tactical-technical knowledge of football is essential to develop optimal and integral teaching processes for students. Therefore, the aim of this study was to design and validate an instrument so that teachers, coaches, and researchers can observe and codify both the tactical behaviors and technical skills performed by the students in the game of football. The design and validation of the instrument were carried out in four phases: a) review of the literature and previous instruments; b) design of the Instrument for the Measurement of Learning and Performance in Football (IMLPFoot). It assesses all the offensive and defensive play actions, with and without the ball, as well as their three components (decision-making, technical execution, and final result); c) sample selection of experts (N = 12); and d) quantitative (Likert-type scale from 1 to 10) and qualitative assessment of degree the pertinence, unambiguity, and importance of each of the 33 items included in the IMLPFoot. Aiken's V coefficient was used to determine content validity. Likewise, internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach's α coefficient. The results showed demanding levels of validity (V ≥ 0.77), internal consistency (α = 0.983), inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability. Therefore, it is a valid and reliable instrument that makes possible a complete assessment of football in physical education classes and/or in the sports context (out-of-school football).
Assuntos
Desempenho Atlético/normas , Futebol Americano , Futebol , Humanos , Aprendizagem , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic diseases in childhood can affect the physical and mental health of patients and their families. The literature on pediatric chronic diseases has found important associations between the sociodemographic variables of children and their caregivers and negative health consequences in families. METHODS: In this study, we aimed to design and validate a questionnaire on sociodemographic variables that would be useful for research on pediatric chronic diseases; and investigate the relationship between sociodemographic variables and psychosocial variables among family caregivers. First, we created a questionnaire that consists of 20 demographic, medical, and family-related items based on a literature review and expert evaluations. This questionnaire was then validated by 335 expert reviewers in the field of Social Work, who work daily with the families of patients with chronic diseases in 10 National Institutes of Health of Mexico. The validation was based on three empirical criteria created specifically for this study, and the reviewers evaluated the usefulness, relevance, and permanence of the items. In a second cross-sectional, correlational and comparative study, a total of 446 family caregivers of children with chronic diseases were interviewed, and they completed the Sociodemographic Variables Questionnaire for research on family caregivers of children with chronic sociodemographic diseases and four psychosocial measurement instruments for evaluating anxiety, depression, caregiver burden and quality of life. RESULTS: Based on the results of the first study, we created the Sociodemographic Variables Questionnaire (Q-SV) for research on family caregivers of children with chronic diseases, and it includes 17 items that assess demographic, medical, and family characteristics. The results of the second study showed that the 17 sociodemographic variables obtained in the validation by expert judges are useful for measuring and evaluating the relationship between psychosocial variables in families of children with chronic diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial and sociodemographic factors are relevant for the development of research processes for families that care for children with chronic diseases.
