Pediatric femoral shaft fractures: the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guidelines versus actual management in a teaching hospital.

Background: In 2009, the clinical practice guidelines (CPG) were released by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), which outline an age-based approach for treating pediatric femoral shaft fractures (PFSF), both nonoperatively and operatively. The aim of the current study was to investigate potential disparities between the recommended treatments for PFSF based on the AAOS-CPG and the actual treatments administered in The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on the medical charts and radiographs of all PFSF treated at The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from January 2014 to January 2022. We identified 445 children who met our inclusion criteria and evaluated their treatments according to the AAOS-CPG. Actual treatments were then compared with the treatments recommended by the AAOS-CPG. Binomial and multivariate logistic regression was used to examine whether different factors could predict the choice between operative and nonoperative management. Results: Operative treatments were undertaken in 102 of 215 (47.4%) fractures in children younger than 6 years, in 102 of 122 (83.6%) fractures in those between 6 and 12 years of age, and in 107 of 108 (99.1%) fractures in those older than 12 years. Nonoperative management was conducted in 113 of 215 (52.6%) fractures in children younger than 6 years, in 20 of 122 (16.4%) fractures in those between 6 and 12 years of age, and in 1 of 108 (0.9%) fractures in those older than 12 years of age. Surgeon decisions for non-surgery were in agreement with the CPG 52.6% of the time, whereas agreement reached 90.9% for surgical choices. Predictors of actual operative management were age (P=0.01), patient weight (P<0.001), fracture pattern (P<0.001), presence of other orthopedic injuries requiring surgery (P=0.002), and polytrauma (P=0.02). Conclusions: There was limited concordance between actual treatments and CPG recommendations, particularly for the nonoperative management of fractures in children under 6 years old. Age, patient weight, fracture pattern, presence of other orthopedic injuries requiring surgery, and polytrauma were the main predictors of our operative decision-making process.

Delayed femoral artery injury caused by heterotopic ossification: a rare case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Arterial injury caused by heterotopic ossification (HO) following fractures is rarely reported, yet it can have catastrophic consequences. This case report presents a unique instance of femoral artery injury and hematoma organization, occurring a decade after intramedullary nail fixation for a femoral shaft fracture complicated by HO. CASE PRESENTATION: A 56-year-old male presented with right femoral artery injury and organized hematoma, a decade after suffering bilateral femoral shaft fractures with mild head injury in a traffic accident. He had received intramedullary nailing for the right femoral shaft fracture and plate fixation for the left side in a local hospital. Physical examination revealed two firm, palpable masses with clear boundaries, limited mobility, and no tenderness. Peripheral arterial pulses were intact. Radiography demonstrated satisfactory fracture healing, while a continuous high-density shadow was evident along the inner and posterior aspect of the right thigh. Computed tomography angiography identified a large mixed-density mass (16.8 × 14.8 × 20.7 cm) on the right thigh's medial side, featuring central calcification and multiple internal calcifications. The right deep femoral artery coursed within this mass, with a smaller lesion noted on the posterior thigh. Surgical consultation with a vascular surgeon led to planned intervention. The smaller mass was completely excised, but the larger one partially, as it encased the femoral artery. The inability to remove all HO was due to excessive bleeding. Postoperatively, the patient experienced no complications, and one-year follow-up revealed a favorable recovery with restoration of full right lower limb mobility. CONCLUSION: This case underscores the potential gravity of vascular injury associated with heterotopic ossification. Surgeons should remain vigilant regarding the risk of vascular injury during HO excision.

Acute prophylactic antibiotic nailing of open femoral shaft fractures for prevention of fracture-related infection.

Background: Open, grossly contaminated femoral shaft fractures pose a significant threat for fracture-related infection. Traditional treatment for these injuries consists of irrigation and debridement with temporizing external fixation placement and staged conversion to definitive fixation. Methods: We describe a protocol for acute antibiotic cement nailing of open femoral shaft fractures as an infection prophylaxis modality in fractures with a high risk of infection and present three cases. Results: Three patients presented with open femoral shaft fractures with large soft tissue defects and gross contamination and were successfully treated with acute retrograde antibiotic nailing and external fixation with later conversion to definitive metallic nailing. They did not develop infection and had acceptable postoperative function and fracture alignment. Conclusion: This technique of early infection prophylaxis after open femoral shaft fracture is reproducible, pragmatic, and cost-effective.

Femoral shaft displacement and Winquist classification provide predictive characteristics for combined femoral neck and femoral shaft fractures.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study is to establish radiographic features and characteristics of patient injury in cases of femoral shaft fractures that predict the presence of ipsilateral femoral neck fractures (IFNFs). METHODS: Patient data was retrospectively assessed from a single level I trauma center through the electronic health record using (Current Procedural Terminology) CPT codes for both isolated and combined ipsilateral femoral shaft and neck fractures. Demographic information, injury characteristics, and independently reviewed radiographic features were collected and compared against the same information from a group of isolated femoral shaft fractures. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for concomitant IFNFs and their respective odds ratios. A probability algorithm for assessing ipsilateral femoral neck fractures based on independent multivariate predictors was constructed and used. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients with either isolated femoral shaft fractures or combined femoral shaft and IFNF (n = 33) met inclusion criteria and were identified for this study. Fracture displacement was most strongly associated with increased risk of combined injury with an aOR of 25.64 (95 %CI = 5.96-110.28) for every 100 % displacement. Motorcycle crash (MCC) was the mechanism associated with the highest risk of combined injury, with an aOR of 9.85 (95 % CI = 1.99-48.74). Combined injury was also correlated with lower Winquist score and presentation with a closed fracture, with aORs of 0.38 (95 %CI = 0.21 - 0.68) and 11.61 (95 %CI = 1.93-69.94), respectively. Presence of at least 3 of the statistically significant variables produced a positive predictive value (PPV) of ≥ 89 % for combined femoral shaft and IFNF. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of combined femoral shaft and IFNF is of critical importance when caring for orthopedic trauma patients. While diagnosis remains a challenging task, MCC mechanism, >100 % fracture displacement, and lower Winquist classification were found to be associated with combined injuries. The combination of these variables might assist in predicting the probability of combined injury and potentially guide decision making on the appropriateness of obtaining single sequence MRI or implementing prophylactic femoral neck fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Exploration of the Clinical Effect of Different Autotransfusion Methods on Patients With Femoral Shaft Fracture Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical effect of predeposit, salvage, and hemodilution autotransfusion on patients with femoral shaft fracture (FSF) surgery. METHODS: Selected patients with FSF were randomly divided into three groups: intraoperative blood salvage autotransfusion, preoperative hemodilution autohemotransfusion, and predeposit autotransfusion. Five days after the operation, the body temperature, heart rate, blood platelet (PLT), and hemoglobin (Hb) of patients were determined. The concentrations of EPO and GM-CSF in the three groups were calculated by ELISA. The content of CD14+ monocytes was calculated by FCM assay. The growth time and condition of the patient's callus were determined at the 30th, 45th, and 60th day after operation. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the correlation between EPO, GM-CSF, CD14+ mononuclear content, callus growth, and autotransfusion methods. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in body temperature and heart rate between the three groups (p > 0.05). PLT and Hb in the Predeposit group were markedly increased compared with that in the Salvage and Hemodilution groups. The concentrations of EPO and GM-CSF in the Predeposit group were markedly increased compared with that in the Salvage and Hemodilution groups. The content of CD14+ monocytes in the Predeposit group was significantly higher than that in the Salvage and Hemodilution groups. Predeposit autotransfusion promotes callus growth more quickly. CONCLUSION: Predeposit autotransfusion promoted the recovery of patients with FSF after the operation more quickly than salvage autotransfusion and hemodilution autotransfusion.

Comparing outcomes of plate augmentation, nail exchange, and nail exchange with plate augmentation in the treatment of atrophic femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing: a multicenter retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Intramedullary (IM) nailing is the treatment of choice for femoral shaft fractures, but nonunion rates have been reported to be as high as 12%. Surgical interventions for nonunion involve exchange nailing or plate augmentation. Recently, a combined treatment of exchange nailing and plate augmentation has demonstrated good results, but its comparative effectiveness remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of three different surgical interventions for atrophic femoral shaft nonunion, and investigate the factors that affect bone healing after reoperation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at five university hospitals involving 149 patients with aseptic atrophic nonunion after IM nailing. These patients underwent reoperation with plate augmentation, exchange nailing, or combined treatment. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed and compared according to reoperation procedure. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting persistent nonunion after reoperation. RESULTS: Of the cohort, 57 patients underwent plate augmentation, 64 underwent exchange nailing, and 28 received combined treatment. There were no significant differences in patient demographics among the groups. Exchange nailing produced a significantly lower union rate than did the combined treatment (82.8% vs. 100%, p = 0.016), whereas no significant difference was observed in the union rate and time to the union between plate augmentation and the combined treatment. Combined treatment showed the longest operative time and the greatest transfusion requirements. The risk factors for persistent nonunion included age, absence of autogenous bone grafts, and use of an exchange nailing technique. CONCLUSIONS: Exchange nailing as a treatment for atrophic femoral shaft nonunion after IM nailing resulted in a lower union rate. The efficacy of the combined treatment requires further study, and persistent nonunion may be influenced by age, bone grafting, and surgical techniques. A comprehensive approach targeting both biological environment and mechanical stability is crucial in the treatment of atrophic femoral shaft nonunion.

Pediatric femoral shaft fracture requiring revision surgery for nonunion associated with vitamin D and K deficiencies: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Nonunion of femoral shaft fractures in children is rare, and there is no clear treatment protocol. In this case report, a pediatric femoral shaft fracture that developed in nonunion due to vitamin deficiency after osteosynthesis, which was successfully treated with vitamin augmentation and replacement with a rigid antegrade intramedullary nail, is described. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient is an 11-year-old Japanese girl. She injured her right femoral shaft fracture when she hit a wall after kickboarding down a hill and underwent osteosynthesis with a titanium elastic nail. Six months postoperatively, she developed nonunion, was found to be deficient in vitamins D and K, and was started on vitamin supplementation. She underwent replacement with a rigid antegrade intramedullary nail at 7 months postoperatively, and bone union was achieved 3 months after reoperation. CONCLUSION: When delayed union of a fracture is observed postoperatively, even in children without underlying disease, the cause of the problem must be investigated and treated promptly.

Capsular distension in high-energy femoral shaft fractures is associated with occult femoral neck fracture: a preliminary retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between hip capsular distension, the computed tomography (CT) capsular sign, and lipohemarthrosis as they relate to occult femoral neck fracture (FNF) in the setting of ipsilateral femoral shaft fracture (FSF). DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and forty-two patients with high-energy FSF and no evidence of FNF on preoperative radiographs and pelvis CT. All patients were stabilized with non-reconstruction style nails. INTERVENTION: Pelvis CT scans were examined for hip capsular distension irrespective of the other side, differing side-to-side measurements of capsular distension (i.e., the CT capsular sign), and lipohemarthrosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: FNF was observed for on postoperative radiographs. Relative risk (RR), number needed to treat (NNT), sensitivity (SN), and specificity (SP) were determined. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (24.0%) had capsular distension. Forty-two patients (17.4%) had differing capsular measurements (i.e., the CT capsular sign), and 16 (6.6%) had symmetrical distension from bilateral hip effusions. Eight patients (3.3%) had lipohemarthrosis. Four FNFs (1.7%) were identified. Three patients had capsular distension, 2 had CT capsular signs, and 1 had lipohemarthrosis. The last patient had no CT abnormalities. Only capsular distension (RR = 10, CI = 1.001-90, P = 0.049; SN = 75%, SP = 77%; NNT = 22) and lipohemarthrosis (RR = 23, CI = 1.6-335, P = 0.022; SN = 50%, SP = 96%; NNT = 8) were associated with occult FNF. CONCLUSIONS: Capsular distension is associated with FNF irrespective of the contralateral hip. Preemptive stabilization using a reconstruction nail could be considered in the setting of capsular distension or lipohemarthrosis to prevent displacement of an occult FNF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III.

Effect of postoperative fracture gap on bone union: A retrospective cohort analysis of simple femoral shaft fractures.

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary nailing (IMN) is considered the gold-standard treatment for femoral shaft fractures. The post operative fracture gap is commonly recognized as a risk factor for nonunion. However, no evaluation standard for measuring the fracture gap size has yet been established. In addition, the clinical implications of the fracture gap size have also not been determined so far. This study aims to clarify how we should evaluate fracture gaps when assessing simple femoral shaft fractures with radiographs and to determine the acceptable cut-off value of the fracture gap size in simple femoral shaft fractures. METHOD: A retrospective observational study with a consecutive cohort was conducted at the trauma center of a university hospital. We investigated the fracture gap using postoperative radiography and the postoperative bone union of transverse and short oblique femoral shaft fractures fixed by IMN. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to obtain the fracture gap's mean, minimum, and maximum cut-off values. Fisher's exact test was used at the cut-off value of the most accurate parameter. RESULTS: In the four nonunions among the 30 cases, the analysis using ROC curves revealed that the maximum value had the highest accuracy among the maximum, minimum, and mean values of fracture-gap size. The cut-off value was determined to be 4.14 mm with high accuracy. Fisher's exact test showed that the incidence of nonunion was higher in the group with a maximum fracture gap of 4.14 mm or greater (risk ratio = not applicable, risk difference = 0.57, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In simple transverse and short oblique femoral shaft fractures fixed with IMN, the fracture gap on radiographs should be evaluated by the maximum gap in the AP and lateral views. The remaining maximum fracture gap of ≥4.14 mm would be a risk factor for nonunion.

Comparing pediatric femoral shaft fracture repair patient outcomes between pediatric and non-pediatric orthopedic surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: While pediatric femoral shaft fractures account for less than 2% of all fractures in children, they are the most common pediatric fracture requiring hospitalization. Management of pediatric femoral shaft fractures is challenging, with various treatment options relating to severity and patient age. The last few decades have seen an increased supply of pediatric orthopedic surgeons (POS) along with increased referral rates. However, there continues to be a maldistribution of POS throughout the country. This study sought to determine outcomes following femoral shaft fracture repair by POS compared to non-pediatric trained orthopedic surgeons. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database was queried to identify pediatric patients who underwent open treatment of femoral shaft fracture from 2012 to 2019. Differences in patient demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were assessed and compared between patients who were treated by pediatric subspecialty-trained orthopedic surgeons and those treated by non-pediatric orthopedic surgeons. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses were utilized. RESULTS: Of the 5862 pediatric patients who underwent femoral shaft fracture treatment, 4875 (83.2%) had their surgeries performed by a POS whereas 987 (16.8%) were operated on by a non-pediatric surgeon. POS were more likely to operate on patients with a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (p < 0.001) and those with medical comorbidities, including gastrointestinal (p = 0.022) and neurological (p < 0.001). After controlling for baseline patient characteristics on multivariable regression analysis, patients treated by non-pediatric orthopaedic surgeons are at an increased risk of prolonged hospital stay (OR 2.595; p < 0.001) when compared to patients operated on by POS. CONCLUSION: The results indicated that patients undergoing surgical treatment for a femoral shaft fracture by a non-pediatric trained orthopedic surgeon were at increased risk of a prolonged hospital stay compared to those being treated by POS. Additionally, POS were more likely to operate on more difficult patients with increased comorbidities.

Surgical Treatments for Femoral Shaft Fractures: A Narrative Review.

Femoral shaft fractures are increasingly common due to various traumatic injuries. Intramedullary nail (IMN) is considered the gold standard treatment for these fractures, but comorbidities often require thorough trauma life support and intensive care. The primary goal of treatment is rigid fixation, early mobilisation, and long-term functional recovery. This article reviews current concepts in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures, including the effects of early or delayed operation, differences between antegrade or retrograde intramedullary nailing, alternative methods to using a fracture table, methods to predict nail length before operation, assessing femoral rotation during an operation, and complications.

Submuscular plating vs. elastic stable intramedullary nailing for diaphyseal femur fractures in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: This review evaluates the safety and efficacy of submuscular plating (SMP) vs. elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) in the treatment of pediatric femur shaft fracture. Method: Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of SMP and ESIN in pediatric shaft fracture were retrieved from five databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, OVID, and Web of Science) from inception to March 2023 using a systematic literature search strategy. A total of 13 outcome measures, such as perioperative parameters, clinical outcomes, and radiographic results, were included in the meta-analysis. Results: Eight eligible studies involving 491 patients were included in the narrative synthesis. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Meta-analysis showed reduced radiation time (RT), soft tissue irritation and angular deformation in the SMP group than in the ESIN group. However, the SMP group had greater estimated blood loss (EBL) than the ESIN group. The duration of surgery, length of hospital stay (LOS), implant removal, complications requiring surgery, Flynn score, incidence of infection, fracture healing time, and limb length discrepancy (LLD) were similar between the two groups. Only one study reported higher incidences of fracture nonunion or delayed healing in the ESIN group. Conclusion: SMP is an effective and safe intervention superior to ESIN in reducing soft tissue irritation, angular deformation and radiation time. Given the presence of potential bias and heterogeneity, surgeons should select the treatment that would provide the best outcomes for EBL, LOS, operation time, and bone nonunion or delayed healing based on their experience. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023404118, Identifier PROSPERO (CRD42021228512).

Clinical versus radiological method for adjusting rotational alignment during femoral shaft fractures intramedullary nailing and the malrotation impact on the functional outcomes: early results from a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the current study is to assess which is better for obtaining the proper femoral rotation during IMN of femoral fractures, the radiological or clinical method. The secondary objectives were to document malrotation's incidence and its effect on the hip and knee functional outcomes. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with unilateral femoral shaft fractures were treated using intramedullary nails (IMN) on a usual radiolucent operative table. Intraoperative rotation adjustment was performed using a radiological method (relying on the contralateral lesser trochanter profile) in 16 patients (group A), while in 17 patients, a clinical method was used (group B). Postoperative assessment of malrotation was performed using a CT scan, and 15 degrees was the cutoff value where below is an acceptable rotation (group I) and above is true malrotation (group II). Functional assessment was performed using the Harris hip score (HHS), the Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (TLKSS), and the Neer score. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 30.7 ± 9.3 years; 81.8% were males, and the left side was injured in 63.6% of patients. After a mean follow up of 18.2 ± 6.9 months, all fractures were united, and the overall mean amount of rotational difference between the fractured and the contralateral side was 14.7° ± 6.0 (3-29.4), 84.8% were in external rotation. No difference in the mean rotational deformity in group A compared to group B. Measurements were 13.9 ± 6.7 and 15.7 ± 5.5, respectively (p = 0.47). Seventeen (51.5%) patients in group I with a mean deformity of 9.8 ± 3.4 (3-14.7), while group II consisted of 16 (48.5%) patients with a mean deformity of 19.6 ± 3.7 (15.3-29.4). There was no difference in the functional scores between group I and group II; HHS was 89.4 ± 7.4 versus 87.7 ± 8.9 (p = 0.54), TLKSS was 84.6 ± 9.6 versus 80.4 ± 13.9 (p = 0.32), and Neer score was 87.9 ± 9.5 versus 83 ± 12.5 (p = 0.21) for group I and group II, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in malrotation incidence after unilateral femoral fractures IMN with either an intraoperative clinical or radiological method for rotational adjustment; furthermore, malrotation did not affect the functional outcomes.

Trends in incidence, health care consumption, and medical and productivity costs of femoral shaft fractures in the Netherlands between 2005 and 2019.

INTRODUCTION: Population-based knowledge on the occurrence of femoral shaft fractures is necessary for allocation of health care services, optimization of preventive measures, and research purposes. This nationwide study aimed to provide an overview on the incidence of femoral shaft fractures over a 15-year period and to gain insight into health care consumption and work absence with associated costs in the Dutch population. METHODS: Data of patients who sustained an acute femoral shaft fracture in the years 2005-2019 were extracted from the National Medical Registration of the Dutch Hospital Database. The incidence rate, hospital length of stay (HLOS), direct medical costs, productivity costs, and years lived with disability were calculated for age- and gender specific groups. RESULTS: A total of 15,847 patients with a femoral shaft fracture were included. The incidence rate increased with 13 % over this 15-year period (5.71/100,000 persons per year in 2005 and 6.47/100,000 in 2019). The mean HLOS per patient was 13.8 days in 2005-2009 versus 8.4 days in 2015-2019 for the entire group. Mean HLOS per patient increased with age (10.0 days for age group 0-9 and 12.7 days for age group >80), but declined over time from 13.6 days in 2005-2009 to 8.8 days in 2015-2019 in males, and from 13.7 days and to 8.2 days, respectively, in females. The costs due to work absence was higher in males. Cumulative health care costs were highest in females >80 years (8.4 million euros versus 1.6 million in males). CONCLUSION: The incidence rate of femoral shaft fractures increased over the past 15 years in the Netherlands. Mean HLOS per patient has decreased in all age groups and in both sexes. Health care costs were highest for female octogenarians.

Ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures: Results of two treatment strategies / Fracturas ipsilaterales proximales y diafisarias del fémur: resultados de 2 estrategias de tratamiento

Introduction: Ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures typically occur in young adults after high-energy trauma. No consensus exists regarding the optimal internal fixation device or surgical strategy for these complex fractures. Our main objective is to identify differences on outcomes and complications between patients treated with one or combined implants. Material and method: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study in patients with associated fractures of the proximal (31 AO) and shaft femur (32 AO). We divided the patients into two groups according to the use of single (Group I) or combined implants (Group II). Demographic, clinical, radiological, surgical data and development of complications were collected.Results: We identified 28 patients (19 men and 9 women) with an average age of 43 years. We used an anterograde femoral nail in group I (17 patients) and a retrograde femoral nail or a plate associated with hip lag screws or sliding hip screw in Group II (11 patients). Patients were followed up for 26.28 (9.12–62.88) months. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head, osteoarthritis, infection or nonunion was found in 9 patients (32%). No significant differences (p 0.70) were found in complications between two groups or between definitive surgical fixation before or after the first 24h. Conclusions: No differences in the development of complications or timing of definitive fixation were found between the use of one or combined implants in ipsilateral proximal femur and shaft fractures. Regardless of the implant chosen, an appropriate osteosynthesis technique is crucial, even so high complication rates are expected.

Introducción: Las fracturas ipsilaterales proximales y diafisarias del fémur suelen ocurrir en adultos jóvenes después de un traumatismo de alta energía. No existe consenso sobre el dispositivo de fijación interna óptimo o la estrategia quirúrgica para estas fracturas complejas. Nuestro principal objetivo es identificar las diferencias en los resultados y complicaciones entre los pacientes tratados con un implante o combinados. Material y método: Este es un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo unicéntrico en pacientes con fracturas asociadas del fémur proximal (31 AO) y diafisarias (32 AO). Dividimos a los pacientes en 2 grupos según el uso de implantes únicos (grupo i) o combinados (grupo ii). Se recogieron datos demográficos, clínicos, radiológicos, quirúrgicos y complicaciones. Resultados: Se identificaron 28 pacientes (19 hombres y 9 mujeres) con una edad promedio de 43 años. Utilizamos un clavo femoral anterógrado en el grupo i (17 pacientes) y un clavo femoral retrógrado o una placa con tornillos a compresión o tornillo deslizante de cadera en el grupo ii (11 pacientes). Los pacientes fueron seguidos durante 26,28 (9,12-62,88) meses. Se encontró osteonecrosis de la cabeza femoral, osteoartritis, infección o seudoartrosis en 9 pacientes (32%). No se encontraron diferencias significativas (p=0,70) en las complicaciones entre los 2 grupos o entre la fijación quirúrgica definitiva antes o después de las primeras 24h. Conclusiones: No se encontraron diferencias en el desarrollo de complicaciones o el momento de la fijación definitiva entre el uso de un implante o combinado en fracturas ipsilaterales de fémur proximal y diafisario. Independientemente del implante elegido, una técnica de osteosíntesis adecuada es crucial; aun así son esperables altas tasas de complicaciones.(AU)

[Artículo traducido] Fracturas ipsilaterales proximales y diafisarias del fémur: resultados de dos estrategias de tratamiento / Ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures: Results of two treatment strategies

Introduction: Ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures typically occur in young adults after high-energy trauma. No consensus exists regarding the optimal internal fixation device or surgical strategy for these complex fractures. Our main objective is to identify differences on outcomes and complications between patients treated with one or combined implants. Material and method: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study in patients with associated fractures of the proximal (31 AO) and shaft femur (32 AO). We divided the patients into two groups according to the use of single (Group I) or combined implants (Group II). Demographic, clinical, radiological, surgical data and development of complications were collected.Results: We identified 28 patients (19 men and 9 women) with an average age of 43 years. We used an anterograde femoral nail in group I (17 patients) and a retrograde femoral nail or a plate associated with hip lag screws or sliding hip screw in Group II (11 patients). Patients were followed up for 26.28 (9.12–62.88) months. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head, osteoarthritis, infection or nonunion was found in 9 patients (32%). No significant differences (p 0.70) were found in complications between two groups or between definitive surgical fixation before or after the first 24h. Conclusions: No differences in the development of complications or timing of definitive fixation were found between the use of one or combined implants in ipsilateral proximal femur and shaft fractures. Regardless of the implant chosen, an appropriate osteosynthesis technique is crucial, even so high complication rates are expected.

Introducción: Las fracturas ipsilaterales proximales y diafisarias del fémur suelen ocurrir en adultos jóvenes después de un traumatismo de alta energía. No existe consenso sobre el dispositivo de fijación interna óptimo o la estrategia quirúrgica para estas fracturas complejas. Nuestro principal objetivo es identificar las diferencias en los resultados y complicaciones entre los pacientes tratados con un implante o combinados. Material y método: Este es un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo unicéntrico en pacientes con fracturas asociadas del fémur proximal (31 AO) y diafisarias (32 AO). Dividimos a los pacientes en 2 grupos según el uso de implantes únicos (grupo i) o combinados (grupo ii). Se recogieron datos demográficos, clínicos, radiológicos, quirúrgicos y complicaciones. Resultados: Se identificaron 28 pacientes (19 hombres y 9 mujeres) con una edad promedio de 43 años. Utilizamos un clavo femoral anterógrado en el grupo i (17 pacientes) y un clavo femoral retrógrado o una placa con tornillos a compresión o tornillo deslizante de cadera en el grupo ii (11 pacientes). Los pacientes fueron seguidos durante 26,28 (9,12-62,88) meses. Se encontró osteonecrosis de la cabeza femoral, osteoartritis, infección o seudoartrosis en 9 pacientes (32%). No se encontraron diferencias significativas (p=0,70) en las complicaciones entre los 2 grupos o entre la fijación quirúrgica definitiva antes o después de las primeras 24h. Conclusiones: No se encontraron diferencias en el desarrollo de complicaciones o el momento de la fijación definitiva entre el uso de un implante o combinado en fracturas ipsilaterales de fémur proximal y diafisario. Independientemente del implante elegido, una técnica de osteosíntesis adecuada es crucial; aun así son esperables altas tasas de complicaciones.(AU)

Accelerated fixation is associated with fewer pulmonary embolism in patients with isolated and unilateral femoral shaft fractures: A TQIP analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal time to intramedullary internal fixation for patients with isolated and unilateral femoral shaft fractures was investigated by the American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adult patients from the TQIP between 2017 and 2019 were eligible for inclusion. The associations between time to fixation and target outcomes (pulmonary embolism [PE], deep vein thrombosis [DVT], acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS], and mortality) were assessed. Maximization of the sum of sensitivity and specificity was used to determine the optimal cut point. The patients were divided into three groups according to different time to fixation intervals. A multinomial propensity scores weighting using generalized boosted models was performed for all unbiased pre-treatment factors between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to clarify the outcomes predictors. RESULTS: The univariate and multivariate analysis before weighting showed that only PE was significantly associated with time to fixation (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.09; p = 0.012). The optimal cut point of time to fixation was 13.88 h. The patients were divided into accelerated (≤ 13.88 h), standard (> 13.88 and ≤ 24 h), and delayed (> 24 and < 36 h) groups. After weighting for all unbiased pre-treatment factors between the groups, multivariate logistic regression showed that standard group significantly increased the risk of PE compared with accelerated group (OR, 4.436; 95% CI, 1.844-10.672; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Accelerated intramedullary internal fixation within 13.88 h was associated with a significantly decreased risk of PE compared with standard fixation in patients with isolated and unilateral femoral shaft fractures without additional mortality risks.

Ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures: Results of two treatment strategies. / [Artículo traducido] Fracturas ipsilaterales proximales y diafisarias del fémur: resultados de dos estrategias de tratamiento.

INTRODUCTION: Ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures typically occur in young adults after high-energy trauma. No consensus exists regarding the optimal internal fixation device or surgical strategy for these complex fractures. Our main objective is to identify differences on outcomes and complications between patients treated with one or combined implants. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study in patients with associated fractures of the proximal (31 AO) and shaft femur (32 AO). We divided the patients into two groups according to the use of single (GroupI) or combined implants (GroupII). Demographic, clinical, radiological, surgical data and development of complications were collected. RESULTS: We identified 28 patients (19 men and 9 women) with an average age of 43years. We used an anterograde femoral nail in GroupI (17 patients) and a retrograde femoral nail or a plate associated with hip lag screws or sliding hip screw in GroupII (11 patients). Patients were followed up for 26.28 (9.12-62.88) months. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head, osteoarthritis, infection or nonunion was found in 9 patients (32%). No significant differences (P=.70) were found in complications between two groups or between definitive surgical fixation before or after the first 24h. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in the development of complications or timing of definitive fixation were found between the use of one or combined implants in ipsilateral proximal femur and shaft fractures. Regardless of the implant chosen, an appropriate osteosynthesis technique is crucial, even so high complication rates are expected.

Embolization of Renal Cell Carcinoma Skeletal Metastases Preceding Orthopedic Surgery.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of renal malignancy in adults. Bone is a major site of metastatic disease from RCC. Osseous metastatic disease from RCC is often seen in the spine, pelvis, and femur, and is usually hypervascular in nature like its primary tumor source. This can cause significant pain, reduced function, pathological fracture, nerve compression, and decreased quality of life during cancer treatment and disease course. Surgical treatments for pathological fracture of the femur include resection, reconstruction, and stabilization with arthroplasty or placement of an intramedullary nail. This series looks at three cases of renal cell carcinoma metastases to the hip with pre-procedural embolization and orthopedic stabilization. Interventional radiology embolization of the arterial supply to the metastatic hypervascular bone lesions can reduce intraoperative blood loss and associated complications.