Successful pregnancy outcome after fresh embryo transfer in a dual stimulation cycle - a case report.

Controlled ovarian stimulation by antagonist protocol sometimes presents unpleasant surprises in the form of unexpected premature rupture of follicles despite well-timed daily administration of the antagonist. In such cases ovum pick up cannot be done, dual stimulation of the next crop of follicles may be pursued to salvage the cycle. A 'freeze all' strategy is usually implemented in all cases of dual stimulation because of embryo-endometrial asynchrony. Here we present a case where dual stimulation was followed by fresh embryo transfer with a successful pregnancy outcome.

Three successful births after three consecutive embryo transfers.

In the last decade, frozen embryo transfer (FET) has become the preferred option for certain groups of patients rather than fresh embryo transfer. The apparent superiority of FET may be explained by improved endometrial receptivity outside stimulated cycles. In this context, our study seeks to contribute to this discussion by reporting a case involving a certain degree of originality and a success rate not commonly seen in ART. This case demonstrates that both fresh and frozen embryo transfer are good treatment options.

Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer: Cumulative live birth rates of 7,236 IVF cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether elective frozen embryo transfer (eFET), or the 'freeze-all' strategy, associated with better cumulative clinical outcomes compared with fresh embryo transfer (ET). METHODS: A total of 7,236 IVF cycles that were followed by a fresh ET or eFET between 2013 and 2017. The patients were subjected to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol and cleavage-stage ET. Embryo cryopreservation was performed on day 3 by vitrification using an open system. A comparison of cumulative outcomes between the eFET (n=4,065cycles) and the fresh ET groups (n=3,171cycles) were performed. The analysis was performed in four groups of patients based on the number of retrieved oocytes: Group 1: poor responders (1-3 oocytes); Group 2: suboptimal responders (4-9 oocytes); Group 3: normal responders (10-15 oocytes); and Group 4: hyper-responders (>15 oocytes). The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per stimulated cycle. RESULTS: There were a total of 10,283 ETs (n=5,639 eFET group; n=4,644 fresh group). The freeze-all strategy is associated with improved CLBRs in normal and hyper-responders, but not in suboptimal and poor responders. In Group 1, there were 351 IVF cycles and 387 ETs in total, and the CLBR was 14.3% and 17.7% (p=0.584) for the eFET and fresh group, respectively. In Group 2, there were 2,074 IVF cycles and 2,465 ET in total, and the CLBR was 25.1% and 23.3% (p=0.083) in the eFET and fresh group, respectively. There was a significant difference in the CLBR in Groups 3 and 4, favouring the eFET strategy. In Group 3, 2226 IVF cycles and 3243 ET were performed. The CLBR was 40.5% in the eFET and 36.6% in the fresh group (p<0.001). In Group 4, there were 2547 IVF cycles and 3,188 ET in total, and the CLBR was 52.2% and 47.7% (p<0.001) in the eFET and fresh group, respectively. The number needed to treat to achieve one additional live birth was 25.9 in Group 3 and 22.3 in Group 4. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the freeze-all strategy should be individualized. The freeze-all strategy is associated with improved CLBRs in normal and hyper-responders, but not in suboptimal and poor responders.

Efficacy of a modified transvaginal ultrasound-guided fresh embryo transfer procedure.

OBJECTIVE: To present a modified transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) guided embryo transfer (ET) procedure and analyze its efficacy in comparison with conventional transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) guided ET in an unselected population of Brazilian women. METHODS: This retrospective observational case-control study involved 447 fresh ET cycles, 221 guided by TVUS (Group 1), conducted between June 2016 and February 2019, and 226 by TAUS (Group 2), conducted between July 2012 and December 2015. Pregnancy rate was the main endpoint. Groups were compared using the Z test at a level of significance of 95% (p≤0.05). RESULTS: Patient age ranged from 21 and 48 years; mean age was 37.7 years in Group 1 and 38 years in Group 2. Overall, patients that underwent TVUS-guided fresh ET demonstrated significantly higher pregnancy rates than their counterparts that underwent TAUS-guided fresh ET (p=0.0107). TVUS-guided fresh ET also yielded significantly higher pregnancy rates in the subgroups of women aged 36-39 years (p=0.0037) and ≥ 40 years (p=0.0025). However, no significant pregnancy rate difference was observed in women aged ≤ 35 years (p=0.0905). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that TVUS-guided fresh ET was at least as effective as TAUS-guided fresh ET in the studied sample. Pending further prospective studies to better ascertain the effect of TVUS-guided ET, the technique presented deserves consideration since it can offer better visualization, more comfort to patients, and requires only one operator, without negatively affecting pregnancy results.

Pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization using fresh or frozen embryo transfer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing IVF using fresh and/or frozen embryo transfer. METHODS: In this retrospective patient record study, we reviewed 2,872 infertile women's files, who were candidates for IVF. The patients were classified into two groups, including those who underwent fresh embryo transfer (n=1628) and/or frozen embryo transfer (FET) (n=1244). RESULTS: Fertility was achieved in 313 (19.23%) and 356 (28.62%) patients, who underwent fresh ET and FET, respectively. The rates of clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live births were significantly higher in the FET group than the fresh ET group. The incidence of multiple pregnancies, perinatal mortality, abortion in the first trimester, preterm delivery, and low birth weight were significantly higher among fresh ET group [38 (35.51%), 15 (14.50%), 72 (23.01%), 26 (8.30%), and 33 (10.54%), respectively] than in the FET group [25 (15.33%), 6 (6.87%), 63 (17.69%), 14 (3.93%), and 20 (5.61%); p<0.05]. In addition, the incidence of ectopic pregnancies, abortion in the second trimester, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and placenta previa were higher in the fresh ET group, but not significantly so (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Women who underwent IVF via FET showed more successful fertility and pregnancy outcomes compared to those who underwent IVF by fresh ET.

Clinical Pregnancy After Elimination of Embryo Fragments Before Fresh Cleavage-stage Embryo Transfer.

Objective: To determine if the elimination of fragments in cleavage-stage embryos, before fresh transfer, improves pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization cycles. Materials and methods: This is a Prospective observational case-control study carried out at a University Reproductive Center. We included Twenty-six infertile patients divided into two groups. Group one: 13 patients with embryos classified as grade B and C (embryos with fragments) according to the Hill classification, and Group two: 13 patients with grade A embryos (embryos with no fragments). Embryo Defragmentation was performed in embryos of group one 65 to 68 hours after conventional fertilization. Fresh embryo transfer was made after two hours post fragments removal. Reproductive results were evaluated and compared between both groups. Results: The total number of clinical pregnancies was nine. In group one there were 5 (38.5 %); in group two, there were 4 (30.8%). The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.68). Two abortions were reported in the study, both in group one; were fragment elimination was performed. This represents an abortion rate of 40% in patients who got pregnant in this group. These patients had twice the probability of suffering an abortion (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.4-3.37). Ongoing pregnancies were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Removal of fragments in freshly transferred day three embryos could be an alternative to increase clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates in patients who have only poor-quality embryos. Despite the relationship with a higher abortion rate, this strategy could represent a real alternative for this type of patient.

Obstetric outcomes after fresh versus frozen-thawed embryo transfers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if there are differences in the risks of obstetric outcomes in IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies when compared fresh to frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FET). METHODS: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the obstetric outcomes in singleton pregnancies after FET and fresh embryo transfer. The outcomes included in this study were pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), pre-eclampsia, placenta previa, and placenta accreta. RESULTS: The search yielded 654 papers, 6 of which met the inclusion criteria and reported on obstetric outcomes. When comparing pregnancies that arose from FET or fresh embryo transfer, there was an increase in the risk of obstetric complications in pregnancies resulting from FET when compared to those emerging from fresh embryo transfers in PIH (aOR 1.82; 95% CI 1.24-2.68), pre-eclampsia (aOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.07, 1.63), and placenta accreta (aOR 3.51, 95% CI 2.04-6.05). There were no significant differences in the risk between the FET and fresh embryo transfer groups when evaluating placenta previa (aOR 0.70; 95% CI 0.46-1.08). CONCLUSION: The obstetric outcomes observed in pregnancies arising from ART may differ among fresh and FET cycles. Thus, when evaluating to perform a fresh embryo transfer or a freeze-all cycle, these differences found in obstetric outcomes between fresh and FET should be taken into account. The adverse obstetric outcomes after FET found in this study emphasize that the freeze-all policy should not be offered to all the patients, but should be offered to those with a clear indication of the benefit of this strategy.

Does freeze-all policy affect IVF outcome in poor ovarian responders?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the freeze-all strategy affects in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome in poor ovarian responders (POR) defined according to the Bologna criteria. METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing IVF treatment between January 2012 and December 2016 at a single center. A total of 433 POR (as defined by the Bologna criteria) fulfilled criteria and were included in the study; of these, 277 patients underwent fresh embryo transfer (ET) and 156 followed the freeze-all policy. All patients underwent controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) following a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol, and cleavage-stage ET. Main outcome measure was ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes included implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. The freeze-all strategy was implemented when the progesterone serum level was > 1.5 ng/mL or the endometrium was < 7 mm on the trigger day, or as per patient preference. Patients with previous failed fresh ET also underwent fresh ET or freeze-all strategy considering the indications mentioned above. RESULTS: Mean maternal age in the freeze-all group was 39.5 ± 3.6 years and in the fresh ET group was 39.7 ± 3.8 years (P = 0.54). Mean number of embryos transferred (nET) was 1.53 ± 0.6 and 1.60 ± 0.6 (P = 0.12) in the freeze-all and fresh ET groups, respectively. Ongoing pregnancy rate did not differ significantly between the freeze-all and fresh ET groups (9.6% vs 10.1%, respectively; relative risk (RR), 0.95; 95% CI, 0.52-1.73), nor did the clinical pregnancy rate (14.1% vs 13.7%, respectively; RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.63-1.67). Implantation rate was 9.6% and 9.8% (P = 0.82) in the freeze-all and fresh ET groups, respectively. Logistic regression analysis (including maternal age, antral follicle count, number of retrieved and mature oocytes, nET, and fresh ET vs freeze-all strategy) indicated that maternal age (P < 0.001) and nET (P = 0.039) were the only independent variables associated with ongoing pregnancy rate. CONCLUSIONS: The freeze-all strategy, compared with fresh ET, had no impact on IVF outcomes in POR patients as defined according to the Bologna criteria. Multicenter studies including large numbers of patients should be carried out to confirm the results of this study and reach conclusions about the potential benefits of the freeze-all policy for poor responders. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Fresh embryos versus freeze-all embryos - transfer strategies: Nuances of a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether the freeze-all strategy (Freeze/All-ET) could bring about improvements in the clinical assisted reproductive technique (ART) outcomes when compared with the fresh embryo transfer strategy (Fresh-ET) in patients undergoing an ART cycle in accordance with the mean number of oocytes collected. METHODS: A systematic review based on electronic searches in databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) was carried out to identify randomized controlled trails (RCTs) comparing ART outcomes between fresh-embryo transfers versus elective frozen-embryo transfers up to February of 2017. Four reviewers independently evaluated abstracts, validity assessment and data extraction. Odds Ratio (OR) values with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and heterogeneity were evaluated. RESULTS: Five RCTs were included as targets for data extraction and meta-analysis purposes. The results of this meta-analysis were divided into two parts (Freeze/All-ET versus Fresh-ET): Part I- All trials in which the mean number of collected oocytes was >12 and <21 for ongoing pregnancy rate (OR=1.24; 95%CI=1.06-1.44), clinical pregnancy rate (OR=1.19; 95%CI=0.98-1.43), live birth rate (OR= 1.39; 95%CI=0.99-1.95), and miscarriage rate (OR=0.68; 95%CI=0.46-1.00); Part II- Three studies where the mean number of oocytes retrieved was >12 and <15 for ongoing pregnancy rate (OR=1.17; 95%CI=1.00-1.38), clinical pregnancy rate (OR=1.34; 95%CI=0.79-2.28), live birth rate (OR= 1.24; 95%CI=1.00-1.55), and miscarriage rate (RR=0.68; 95%CI=0.46-1.02). CONCLUSIONS: The freeze-all strategy could be favorable when high numbers of oocytes are collected, signaling an association between higher ovarian stimulation and consequent impairment of endometrial receptivity. However, when the mean number of oocytes collected is <15, the freeze-all strategy does not appear to be advantageous.

Elective single embryo transfer: Is frozen better than fresh?

OBJECTIVE: Single embryo transfer (SET) has been recommended to avoid multiple births following assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. Many studies have shown that frozen embryo transfer may yield better pregnancy rates than fresh embryo transfer. This study looked into pregnancy rates following fresh versus frozen single embryo transfer procedures in age-matched patients. METHODS: This retrospective case control study was carried out at a private clinic [NewLife Fertility Clinic, ON, Canada]. Patient groups included infertile women treated with IVF/ICSI and elective single embryo transfer (eSET) given either fresh or frozen embryos. Cycle outcomes were compared between patient groups matched by age. The primary endpoints were positive testing for ß-hCG and viable ongoing pregnancy. The secondary endpoints were live birth and miscarriage rates. RESULTS: A total of 583 eSET cycles (212 fresh transfer cycles and 371 frozen transfer cycles) were performed. Significantly higher pregnancy and live birth rates were observed among patients aged ≤ 39 years given frozen embryos. CONCLUSION: Frozen single embryo transfer was associated with higher pregnancy and live birth rates when compared to fresh single embryo transfer.