Optimizing vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring compliance in pediatric oncology: towards personalized medication management.

Aim: Vancomycin, a crucial treatment for Gram-positive bacteria, necessitates therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to prevent treatment failures. We investigated the healthcare professional's compliance toward TDM of vancomycin recommendations and follow-up levels. Materials & methods: We collected data from 485 patients who received vancomycin in the Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt 57357 medical records system (Cerner) over 4 months, from January to April 2020. Results: Our data shows that only 54% of patients had TDM requests from healthcare professionals for the total patients who received vancomycin treatment. The healthcare professionals' compliance with the recommendations was 91.7%, while the follow-up levels were 66.7%. Conclusion: While overall adherence to recommendations is strong, enhancing compliance with follow-up levels remains a priority for improvement.

[Box: see text].

Using incident reports to diagnose communication challenges for precision intervention in learning health systems: A methods paper.

Introduction: Poor communication is a leading root cause of preventable maternal mortality in the United States. Communication challenges are compounded with the presence of biases, including racism. Hospital administrators and clinicians are often aware that communication is a problem, but understanding where to intervene can be difficult to determine. While clinical leadership routinely reviews incident reports and acts on them to improve care, we hypothesized that reviewing incident reports in a systematic way might reveal thematic patterns, providing targeted opportunities to improve communication in direct interaction with patients and within the healthcare team itself. Methods: We abstracted incident reports from the Women's Health service and linked them with patient charts to join patient's race/ethnicity, birth outcome, and presence of maternal morbidity and mortality to the incident report. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of incident reports using an inductive and deductive approach to categorizing communication challenges. We then described the intersection of different types of communication challenges with patient race/ethnicity and morbidity outcomes. Results: The use of incident reports to conduct research on communication was new for the health system. Conversations with health system-level stakeholders were important to determine the best way to manage data. We developed a thematic codebook based on prior research in healthcare communication. We found that we needed to add codes that were equity focused, as this was missing from the existing codebook. We also found that clinical and contextual expertise was necessary for conducting the analysis-requiring more resources to conduct coding than initially estimated. We shared our findings back with leadership iteratively during the work. Conclusions: Incident reports represent a promising source of health system data for rapid improvement to transform organizational practice around communication. There are barriers to conducting this work in a rapid manner, however, that require further iteration and innovation.

Implementing an advanced team-based care model in a federally qualified health center (FQHC): Assessing implementation facilitators and challenges.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to assess implementation facilitators and challenges for advanced team-based care (aTBC) in a federally qualified health center (FQHC). In aTBC, care team coordinators room patients, perform vitals and agenda setting during patient intake, and remain present alongside providers during patient visits. METHODS: The authors conducted a qualitative post-hoc analysis of the aTBC implementation using data from several sources. They used content analysis to code items as facilitators or challenges and thematic analysis to group those into larger themes. Finally, they applied a priori codes from the revised consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) to organize the facilitators and barriers into subdomains. RESULTS: The existing evidence-base around aTBC, the FQHC's ability to pilot and adapt it, and strong implementation leads were key facilitating factors. Challenges included an external shock (i.e., the COVID-19 pandemic), aTBC complexity, and uncertainty about whether success required implementation of the full model versus easier-to-integrate smaller components. CONCLUSIONS: FQHCs that wish to implement aTBC models need strong champions and internal structures for piloting, adapting, and disseminating interventions. FQHC leaders must think strategically about how to build support and demonstrate success to improve an FQHC's chances of expanding and sustaining aTBC.

Healthcare team resilience during COVID-19: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Resilience, in the field of Resilience Engineering, has been identified as the ability to maintain the safety and the performance of healthcare systems and is aligned with the resilience potentials of anticipation, monitoring, adaptation, and learning. In early 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic challenged the resilience of US healthcare systems due to the lack of equipment, supply interruptions, and a shortage of personnel. The purpose of this qualitative research was to describe resilience in the healthcare team during the COVID-19 pandemic with the healthcare team situated as a cognizant, singular source of knowledge and defined by its collective identity, purpose, competence, and actions, versus the resilience of an individual or an organization. METHODS: We developed a descriptive model which considered the healthcare team as a unified cognizant entity within a system designed for safe patient care. This model combined elements from the Patient Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) and the Advanced Team Decision Making (ADTM) models. Using a qualitative descriptive design and guided by our adapted model, we conducted individual interviews with healthcare team members across the United States. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis and extracted codes were organized within the adapted model framework. RESULTS: Five themes were identified from the interviews with acute care professionals across the US (N = 22): teamwork in a pressure cooker, consistent with working in a high stress environment; healthcare team cohesion, applying past lessons to present challenges, congruent with transferring past skills to current situations; knowledge gaps, and altruistic behaviors, aligned with sense of duty and personal responsibility to the team. Participants' described how their ability to adapt to their environment was negatively impacted by uncertainty, inconsistent communication of information, and emotions of anxiety, fear, frustration, and stress. Cohesion with co-workers, transferability of skills, and altruistic behavior enhanced healthcare team performance. CONCLUSION: Working within the extreme unprecedented circumstances of COVID-19 affected the ability of the healthcare team to anticipate and adapt to the rapidly changing environment. Both team cohesion and altruistic behavior promoted resilience. Our research contributes to a growing understanding of the importance of resilience in the healthcare team. And provides a bridge between individual and organizational resilience.

[The street as a space for care production: the singular therapeutic project and tuberculosis management in people experiencing homelessness during the Covid-19 pandemic in the city of Rio de Janeiro]. / La calle como espacio de producción de cuidados: el proyecto terapéutico singular y el manejo de la tuberculosis en personas en situación de calle durante la pandemia de covid-19 en la ciudad de Río de Janeiro.

From the theoretical perspective of the cartography of the micropolitics of living labor in action, the objective was to analyze the work process of the "street clinic" team based in a primary care unit in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in the management of tuberculosis cases in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. This is an exploratory qualitative research. Between May and December 2021, seven professionals from the street clinic team were interviewed, and participant observation was conducted with field diary records. Three thematic axes emerged from the interviews related to people experiencing homelessness in the context of the Covid -19 pandemic: 1) Challenges, potentialities, and weaknesses of tuberculosis care; 2) Building intersectoral care networks for monitoring individuals with tuberculosis; and 3) The street as a space for care production: the work process of the street clinic in tuberculosis management. It is concluded that caring for people experiencing homelessness with tuberculosis in the context of the Covid -19 pandemic requires not only managing clinical protocols but also building shared work with the intra and intersectoral network. In addition to the task of being in the territory, the outpatient service in the territory must also be a street outpatient service, especially regarding tuberculosis treatment.

Desde la perspectiva teórica de la cartografía de la micropolítica del trabajo vivo en acto, el objetivo fue analizar el proceso de trabajo del equipo del "consultorio en la calle" con sede en una unidad de atención básica de la ciudad de Río de Janeiro, Brasil, en el manejo de casos de tuberculosis, en el contexto de la pandemia de covid-19. Se trata de una investigación exploratoria con enfoque cualitativo. Entre mayo y diciembre de 2021, se entrevistaron a siete profesionales del equipo consultorio en la calle, y se realizó observación participante con registros en diario de campo. De las entrevistas surgieron tres ejes temáticos relacionados con la población en situación de calle en el contexto de la pandemia covid-19: 1) Desafíos, potencialidades y fragilidades del cuidado de la tuberculosis; 2) Construcción de redes de cuidados intersectoriales para el seguimiento de las personas con tuberculosis; y 3) La calle como espacio de producción de cuidado: el proceso de trabajo del consultorio en la calle en el manejo de la tuberculosis. Se concluye que la atención a personas en situación de calle con tuberculosis en el contexto de la pandemia covid-19 requiere no solo de la gestión de protocolos clínicos, sino también de la construcción de un trabajo compartido con la red intra e intersectorial. Además de la tarea de estar en el territorio, el servicio ambulatorio del territorio también debe ser un servicio ambulatorio de la calle, especialmente en lo que respecta al tratamiento de la tuberculosis.

[When workplace becomes the place where a relative with cancer is cared: How do caregiver, patient and healthcare professionals interact?] / Quand le lieu de travail devient le lieu d'accueil d'un proche atteint de cancer : quelles interactions entre aidant, patient, soignants ?

INTRODUCTION: Three clinical situations explored the interactions between patients treated for cancer in oncology, their family caregivers working as doctors or nurses in the same establishment or service, and the healthcare team providing the patient's care, as well as the repercussions of such a context on these three players. METHODS: In each situation, the patient, the family caregiver and a member of the team were interviewed using a semi-directive interview guide. The 8 interviews were recorded and transcribed in full, then subjected to thematic content analysis. RESULTS: The tension between "wanting to stay in their place as a relative" and facilitating/accelerating the patient's medical journey was heightened when the patient is being cared for in the institution/service in which the family's caregiver works. The healthcare team reported additional psychological pressure, but few arrangements are made by the team to support the specific nature of these situations. Various factors, such as the severity of the illness, the closeness of the relationship between the caregiver and the patient, existence of a hierarchical link between the caregiver and the team, and the presence of the caregiver on the ward, seemed to potentiate the difficulties felt by the healthcare team and the individual suffering of the caregiver. DISCUSSION: These situations generated intra- and interpersonal psychological tensions for all concerned, each oscillating between their status as family caregiver and healthcare professional, or as colleague and healthcare professional. These situations have raised ethical and psychological questions for all involved, which need to be anticipated.

La calle como espacio de producción de cuidados: el proyecto terapéutico singular y el manejo de la tuberculosis en personas en situación de calle durante la pandemia de covid-19 en la ciudad de Río de Janeiro / The street as a space for care production: the singular therapeutic project and tuberculosis management in people experiencing homelessness during the Covid-19 pandemic in the city of Rio de Janeiro

RESUMEN Desde la perspectiva teórica de la cartografía de la micropolítica del trabajo vivo en acto, el objetivo fue analizar el proceso de trabajo del equipo del "consultorio en la calle" con sede en una unidad de atención básica de la ciudad de Río de Janeiro, Brasil, en el manejo de casos de tuberculosis, en el contexto de la pandemia de covid-19. Se trata de una investigación exploratoria con enfoque cualitativo. Entre mayo y diciembre de 2021, se entrevistaron a siete profesionales del equipo consultorio en la calle, y se realizó observación participante con registros en diario de campo. De las entrevistas surgieron tres ejes temáticos relacionados con la población en situación de calle en el contexto de la pandemia covid-19: 1) Desafíos, potencialidades y fragilidades del cuidado de la tuberculosis; 2) Construcción de redes de cuidados intersectoriales para el seguimiento de las personas con tuberculosis; y 3) La calle como espacio de producción de cuidado: el proceso de trabajo del consultorio en la calle en el manejo de la tuberculosis. Se concluye que la atención a personas en situación de calle con tuberculosis en el contexto de la pandemia covid-19 requiere no solo de la gestión de protocolos clínicos, sino también de la construcción de un trabajo compartido con la red intra e intersectorial. Además de la tarea de estar en el territorio, el servicio ambulatorio del territorio también debe ser un servicio ambulatorio de la calle, especialmente en lo que respecta al tratamiento de la tuberculosis.

ABSTRACT From the theoretical perspective of the cartography of the micropolitics of living labor in action, the objective was to analyze the work process of the "street clinic" team based in a primary care unit in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in the management of tuberculosis cases in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. This is an exploratory qualitative research. Between May and December 2021, seven professionals from the street clinic team were interviewed, and participant observation was conducted with field diary records. Three thematic axes emerged from the interviews related to people experiencing homelessness in the context of the Covid -19 pandemic: 1) Challenges, potentialities, and weaknesses of tuberculosis care; 2) Building intersectoral care networks for monitoring individuals with tuberculosis; and 3) The street as a space for care production: the work process of the street clinic in tuberculosis management. It is concluded that caring for people experiencing homelessness with tuberculosis in the context of the Covid -19 pandemic requires not only managing clinical protocols but also building shared work with the intra and intersectoral network. In addition to the task of being in the territory, the outpatient service in the territory must also be a street outpatient service, especially regarding tuberculosis treatment.

Expanding general practice with interprofessional teams: a mixed-methods patient perspective study.

BACKGROUND: Across healthcare systems, current health policies promote interprofessional teamwork. Compared to single-profession general practitioner care, interprofessional primary healthcare teams are expected to possess added capacity to care for an increasingly complex patient population. This study aims to explore patients' experiences when their usual primary healthcare encounter with general practice shifts from single-profession general practitioner care to interprofessional team-based care. METHODS: Qualitative and quantitative data were collected through interviews and a survey among Norwegian patients. The interviews included ten patients (five women and five men) aged between 28 and 89, and four next of kin (all women). The qualitative analysis was carried out using thematic analysis and a continuity framework. The survey included 287 respondents, comprising 58 per cent female and 42 per cent male participants, aged 18 years and above. The respondents exhibited multiple diagnoses and often a lengthy history of illness. All participants experienced the transition to interprofessional teamwork at their general practitioner surgery as part of a primary healthcare team pilot. RESULTS: The interviewees described team-based care as more fitting and better coordinated, including more time and more learning than with single-profession general practitioner care. Most survey respondents experienced improvements in understanding and mastering their health problems. Multi-morbid elderly interviewees and interviewees with mental illness shared experiences of improved information continuity. They found that important concerns they had raised with the nurse were known to the general practitioner and vice versa. None of the interviewees expressed dissatisfaction with the inclusion of a nurse in their general practitioner relationship. Several interviewees noted improved access to care. The nurse was seen as a strengthening link to the general practitioner. The survey respondents expressed strong agreement with being followed up by a nurse. The interviewees trusted that it was their general practitioner who controlled what happened to them in the general practitioner surgery. CONCLUSION: From the patients' perspective, interprofessional teamwork in general practice can strengthen management, informational, and relational continuity. However, a prerequisite seems to be a clear general practitioner presence in the team.

Current trends and future perspectives of stroke management through integrating health care team and nanodrug delivery strategy.

Stroke is accounted as the second-most mortality and adult disability factor in worldwide, while causes the bleeding promptly and lifetime consequences. The employed functional recovery after stroke is highly variable, allowing to deliver proper interventions to the right stroke patient at a specific time. Accordingly, the multidisciplinary nursing team, and the administrated drugs are major key-building-blocks to enhance stroke treatment efficiency. Regarding the healthcare team, adequate continuum of care have been declared as an integral part of the treatment process from the pre-hospital, in-hospital, to acute post-discharge phases. As a curative perspective, drugs administration is also vital in surviving at the early step and reducing the probability of disabilities in later. In this regard, nanotechnology-based medicinal strategy is exorbitantly burgeoning. In this review, we have highlighted the effectiveness of current clinical care considered by nursing teams to treat stroke. Also, the advancement of drugs through synthesis of miniaturized nanodrug formations relating stroke treatment is remarked. Finally, the remained challenges toward standardizing the healthcare team and minimizing the nanodrugs downsides are discussed. The findings ensure that future works on normalizing the healthcare nursing teams integrated with artificial intelligence technology, as well as advancing the operative nanodrugs can provide value-based stroke cares.

Having a Say Matters: The Association Between Home Health Aides' Voice and Job Satisfaction.

Purpose: Despite a rapidly growing need for home health aides (HHAs), turnover rates are high. While this is driven in large part by the demanding nature of their work and low wages, another factor may be that HHAs are often not considered part of the medical team which can leave them feeling unheard by other healthcare professionals. We sought to determine whether this concept, or HHAs' perceived voice, was associated with job satisfaction. Methods and Design: This cross-sectional survey of English- and Spanish-speaking HHAs caring for adults with heart failure (HF) was conducted from June 2020 to July 2021 in New York, NY in partnership with a labor management fund of a large healthcare union that provides benefits and training to HHAs. Voice was assessed with a validated 5-item scale (total score range 5 to 25). Job Satisfaction was assessed with the 5-item Work Domain Satisfaction Scale (total score range 5 to 35). Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to examine the association between voice and job satisfaction. Results: A total of 413 HHAs employed by 56 unique home care agencies completed the survey; they had a mean age of 48 years, 97.6% were female, 60.2% were Hispanic, and they worked as HHAs for a median of 10 years (IQR, 5, 17). They had a median Voice score of 18 (IQR 15-20) and mean job satisfaction score of 26.4 (SD 5.6). Higher levels of voice (1.75 [0.46-3.04]) were associated with greater job satisfaction (p=0.008). When adjusting for Race/Ethnicity, HF training, and HF knowledge, the association between Voice and job satisfaction remained significant ((1.77 [0.40-3.13]). Conclusion: HHAs with a voice in the care of their patients experienced greater job satisfaction. Voice may be an important target for interventions aiming to improve HHAs' retention in the field.

The Significance of Cooperation in Interdisciplinary Health Care Teams as Perceived by Polish Medical Students.

Teamwork, as the preferred method of cooperation in healthcare, became prevalent in the 1960s, and since then has been universally recognized as a measure to improve the quality of healthcare. Research indicates that medical care based on interdisciplinary cooperation is associated with increased patient safety, lower hospitalization rates, and reduced rates of complications and medical errors. Furthermore, it enhances the coordination of care and improves patient access to medical services. This model of providing medical care also results in considerable benefits for medical professionals. These include greater job satisfaction and a reduced risk of professional burnout syndrome. AIM: The aim of the study was to explore the opinions of medical students with regard to cooperation in the interdisciplinary team, as well as the factors affecting the formation of opinions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted using the Polish version of the questionnaire Attitudes Towards Interprofessional Health Care Teams. The study involved 1266 participants, including students of medicine (n = 308), midwifery (n = 348), nursing (n = 316) and physiotherapy (n = 294). RESULTS: According to the opinions of the students participating in the study, the therapeutic process based on the interdisciplinary model improves the quality of medical care provided, increases patient safety, and improves communication between members of the therapeutic team. The factors affecting the assessment of cooperation in interdisciplinary medical care teams included the faculty and the year of studies, gender, as well as participation in the multidisciplinary courses. CONCLUSIONS: Students recognize the need for interdisciplinary medical teams. The training of future medical professionals should incorporate the elements of interprofessional education. This form of education allows students to develop both a professional identity and identification with their own profession, as well as encourages teamwork skills and shapes the attitude of openness towards representatives of other medical professions. However, in order to provide the students with the relevant knowledge, skills and competencies, it is essential to respect their diversity in terms of the faculty, as well as to account for the impact of gender and the year of studies which may affect their readiness to engage in teamwork.

Value of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Fellowship After Surgical Training: Bridging the Gap for Improved Patient Care.

Objective: Surgeons comprise 2% of HPM-trained physicians. Little is known about the perceived value of HPM training to the surgeon or medical community. We aim to demonstrate the value of HPM fellowship training to surgeons and surgical practice from the point of view of HPM fellowship trained surgeons. Design: A qualitative analysis was performed using semi-structured zoom interviews that elicited the lived experiences of HPM trained surgeons. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Setting: Researchers were from the University of Kansas School of Medicine and the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Participants were trained and worked across the United States in a variety of settings. Participants: Eligibility included training in general surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, or affiliated subspecialties and completion of a 1-year HPM fellowship. Results: 17 interviews were performed. Several themes emerged regarding the transformative value of HPM training to their medical and surgical practice: (1) Learning to apply shared decision making and goal-concordant care to surgical decision making, and (2) Decreasing personal bias in medical decision making, and (3) Enabling wellness in surgeons. Two themes emerged regarding the perceived value to both the surgical community and the HPM community: (1) Value of the HPM Fellowship Trained Surgeon to the Surgical Community, and (2) Value of the HPM Fellowship Trained Surgeon to the HPM Community. All study participants valued their HPM training and felt highly valued by the healthcare team. Conclusion: HPM trained surgeons are highly valued on the healthcare team and improve patient-centered surgical care.

The Future of Medicine Is Now: the Role of PA Education and the Ever-Changing Healthcare Landscape in the USA.

PAs have been a part of American healthcare team since 1965 and have grown exponentially over the last 20 years. However, the knowledge of the role of PAs and their educational training is not well known, despite the increased number of PA programs in the United States, as well as the presence of PA education programs globally. With the increased demand for clinicians to meet the national and international healthcare needs, PAs and PA education are crucial for the future of healthcare.

Decisões terapêuticas com pacientes em fim de vida: a visão do residente / Therapeutic decisions with end-of-life patients: the perspective of residents

As mudanças epidemiológicas e demográficas impactam diretamente no aumento das doenças crônicas não transmissíveis e na demanda por cuidados em saúde cada vez mais complexos que englobam a tomada de decisão de forma multidisciplinar e compartilhada entre equipe, família e paciente. Portanto o objeto desta pesquisa foi a visão do aluno da residência multiprofissional a respeito das decisões terapêuticas com pacientes em fim de vida tendo como pano de fundo a bioética por princípios de Beauchamp e Childress. Os objetivos foram: descrever, através do discurso do aluno da residência multiprofissional, como se dá o processo de tomada de decisões terapêuticas com pacientes em fim de vida e quais respaldos morais e bioéticos são utilizados nestas decisões; identificar, a partir do discurso do residente multidisciplinar, a participação dos profissionais da saúde, da família/cuidadores e do próprio paciente nas decisões terapêuticas do fim da vida. Trata-se de uma pesquisa qualitativa, descritiva e exploratória, realizada com 25 alunos de três programas de residência multiprofissional do município do Rio de Janeiro. A técnica para coleta dos dados baseou-se em entrevista semiestruturada realizada no período de 15/07 à 20/09/2022. O método para obtenção dos participantes foi o de bola de neve (snow ball) onde o primeiro participante é escolhido aleatoriamente e os demais são indicados pelo antecessor. Foram observados todos os critérios éticos em pesquisa da Resolução 466/2012 do Ministério da Saúde. Para o tratamento dos dados foi utilizada a análise categorial de Denize Oliveira. Ao final da categorização emergiram três categorias: "Processo de tomada de decisão com pacientes em fim da vida", "Princípios éticos norteadores da tomada de decisão" e "O mundo ideal e o mundo real do processo de tomada de decisão". A primeira categoria buscou detalhar o processo de tomada de decisão com pacientes no fim da vida mostrando a centralização da tomada de decisão, a tomada de decisão de forma multidisciplinar e de forma compartilhada com paciente e família. A segunda categoria relacionou o processo de tomada de decisão com pacientes no fim da vida aos princípios bioéticos de Beaucahmp e Childress demonstrando de forma individualizada a utilização destes para a personalização da tomada de decisão. A terceira categoria apontou os pontos que os residentes entendiam como ideais para o processo de tomada de decisão e as questões relacionadas ao que realmente acontece na prática clínica do dia a dia permeada pelas dificuldades estruturais, sociais e acadêmicas que interferem neste processo. Conclui-se que estamos ainda distantes de um modelo ideal de processo de tomada de decisão que ainda se apresenta de forma médicocentrada, verticalizada e pouco compartilhada com família e pacientes. AU

Epidemiological and demographic changes directly impact the increase in non-communicable chronic diseases and the demand for increasingly complex healthcare, which involves multidisciplinary and shared decision-making among the team, family, and patient. Therefore, the objective of this research was to explore the perspective of residents regarding therapeutic decisions with end-of-life patients, framed within the principles of Beauchamp and Childress' bioethics. The specific aims were to describe, through the discourse of multidisciplinary residents, the process of making therapeutic decisions with end-of-life patients and the moral and bioethical foundations guiding these decisions, as well as to identify the involvement of healthcare professionals, family/caregivers, and the patients themselves in end-of-life therapeutic decisions. This qualitative, descriptive, and exploratory research was conducted with 25 residents from three multidisciplinary residency programs in the city of Rio de Janeiro. Data collection was based on semi-structured interviews conducted from July 15th to September 20th, 2022. The snowball sampling method was used to select participants, where the first participant is chosen randomly and subsequent participants are referred by the preceding ones. The ethical criteria outlined in Resolution 466/2012 of the Ministry of Health were observed throughout the research process. Data analysis was performed using Denize Oliveira's categorical analysis. Three categories emerged from the analysis: "Process of decision-making with end-of-life patients," "Ethical principles guiding decision-making," and "The ideal world and the real world of the decision-making process." The first category aimed to detail the decision-making process with end-of-life patients, highlighting the centralization of decision-making, multidisciplinary decision-making, and shared decision-making with patients and their families. The second category linked the decision-making process with end-of-life patients to Beauchamp and Childress' bioethical principles, demonstrating their individualized application to personalize decision-making. The third category identified the aspects that residents perceived as ideal for the decision-making process, as well as the challenges encountered in the clinical practice influenced by structural, social, and academic difficulties. The findings suggest that we are still far from an ideal model of decision-making, as it remains predominantly physician-centered, hierarchical, and lacking in shared decision-making with families and patients. AU

Frequency and type of alterations during medical interpretation by trained healthcare interpreters / 国際保健医療

Objective  This study aimed to identify the types, frequency, and clinical significance of altered interpreta-tion in clinical settings.Methods  Routine outpatient encounters involving Portuguese-speaking Brazilian patients, Japanese doctors, and hospital-provided interpreters were digitally recorded and transcribed. Segments of consecutively interpreted utterances were coded as “altered,” in which the interpreter changed the meaning of the source utterance, or “unaltered (accurate),” and the types and frequency of occurrence were analyzed. Altered interpretations were categorized as clinically negative or positive and classified into four categories: omission, addition, substitution, or voluntary intervention. Incidents resulting from alterations were investigated. Reliability was assessed by examining the correlation between random independently coded samples.Results  In total, 111 encounters were analyzed. The mean segments per encounter was 67.9 (range 14-186), and the mean frequency (standard deviation) of altered interpretations per 100 segments was 46.7 (14.3) for accurate interpretations; 46.1 (17.9) for negative or not significant alterations, including 27.2 (10.3) for omissions, 6.0 (5.0) for additions, 10.4 (6.9) for substitutions, and 2.5 (2.7) for voluntary interventions; 0.0 (0.2) for alterations potentially leading to an incident; and 26.2 (11.9) for positive alterations, including 1.8 (2.6) for positive omissions, 7.7 (4.7) for positive additions, 7.8 (6.3) for positive substitutions, and 8.8 (5.2) for positive voluntary interventions. The frequency of negative alterations was weakly negatively correlated with number of segments per minute (r＝−0.339). Conclusion  Trained healthcare interpreters with fewer clinically significant altered interpretations were effective. Professional medical providers should recognize the importance of positive alterations by healthcare interpreters and collaborate with them to provide safe medical care for foreign patients. To facilitate the provision of appropriate medical care to a growing foreign population with diverse cultural and linguistic needs, undergraduate medical education should teach aspiring medical professionals how to collaborate with healthcare interpreters and foreign patients.

A mixed-methods program evaluation of the Alda Healthcare Experience- a program to improve healthcare team communication.

BACKGROUND: Communication among interprofessional healthcare worker teams is critical to ensure a thriving and resilient workforce. We will evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the Alda Healthcare Experience (AHE), a novel medical improvisation (improv) workshop designed to improve interprofessional communication skills among healthcare professionals. The AHE workshop includes a two-hour experiential training workshop led by an improv specialist and a clinical co-facilitator. In July 2022 we began implementing the AHE workshop by training 18 clinical co-facilitators who will co-facilitate the workshops for 550 healthcare workers from five hospital departments at Stony Brook University Hospital over the course of a year and a half. Using mixed-methods, we will conduct an Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Design project that includes an outcome evaluation (effectiveness) and a process evaluation (implementation). METHODS: Our outcome evaluation will assess the impact of the AHE workshop on short- and long-term improvement in interprofessional communication, stress, and professional fulfillment. The process evaluation component will examine programmatic, organizational, and individual facilitators or barriers to effective implementation of the AHE workshop. Qualitative methods will include dimensional analysis employing individual interviews of 20-40 AHE Project Participants, 5-10 Selected Informants, and all the clinical co-facilitators. Quantitative methods will use a quasi-experimental longitudinal design with an intervention group and surveillance of a control group (wait-list) and repeated assessments using validated instruments measuring communications skills, professional fulfillment, stress, burnout, uncertainty tolerance, and teamwork. DISCUSSION: Effective and efficient communication within healthcare teams is fundamental to building team cohesion that, in turn, supports individual resilience and builds positive organizational culture. The AHE program is an innovative approach to improve interprofessional healthcare communication and reduce healthcare worker burnout. In addition to institutional buy-in, rigorous evaluations of medical improv programs are necessary as a critical step in making such programs scalable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: N/A.

Leading Change Together: Supporting Collaborative Practice through Joint Accreditation for Interprofessional Continuing Education.

Interprofessional continuing education in support of team-based care is a critical component of healthcare quality and safety. In an effort to develop and advance the field of interprofessional continuing education (IPCE), the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) collaborated to launch Joint Accreditation for Interprofessional Continuing Education™, the first and only accrediting body in the world to offer the opportunity to be simultaneously accredited to provide CE activities for multiple healthcare professions through a single, unified application process, fee structure, and set of accreditation standards. To date, seven additional professions have joined Joint Accreditation: athletic trainers, dentists, dieticians, optometrists, physician associates/physician assistants (PAs), psychologists, and social workers. With this expansion, jointly accredited organisations can choose to offer IPCE for up to ten professions without needing to attain separate accreditations. Jointly accredited providers are able to offer education that is designed for single professions, multiple professions, and interprofessional teams, as long as 25% of the education is interprofessional. This innovation facilitates and incentivises IPCE which leads to improved healthcare delivery and better patient outcomes. To effectively integrate interprofessional collaborative practice throughout healthcare systems across the world, IPCE needs to become an integral part of lifelong learning for all health professions. There are several jointly accredited organisations that operate outside of the USA, and interest in Joint Accreditation and IPCE continues to grow.

[Our path to electronic patient files]. / Unser Weg zur elektronischen Patientenakte.

Digitization in hospitals is developing rapidly. The aim of many tools is to save time and better interlink interprofessional teams. Digitization also harbors dangers which, in the best-case scenario, can be identified and resolved in good time. This article describes the path of an orthopedic department in the context of a maximum-supply clinic to electronic patient files.

Clinicians' attitudes towards a co-leadership structure for maternity emergency teams: An interview study.

Shared leadership improves team performance in many domains and is present in some interprofessional healthcare teams. Despite the dominant paradigm of a singular obstetrician leader in maternity emergencies, co-leadership, a specific form of shared leadership, has been identified as a potentially beneficial to clinical care. This qualitative interview study addresses the gaps in knowledge regarding clinician attitudes toward co-leadership and how a co-leadership structure might be implemented within a maternity care setting. Twenty-five clinicians (midwives, obstetricians and anaesthetists) working in the birthing units of two tertiary maternity units were interviewed and a conventional content analysis conducted. Clinicians viewed co-leadership as potentially beneficial to patient care through improved leadership performance and co-leader back up behavior. Implementation of co-leadership was thought to require a supportive organizational culture, agreed patient management protocols and the participation in simulation training. Enacting co-leadership required adaptable leadership sharing practices, effective communication, and high levels of trust between the co-leaders. These findings inform the future implementation strategies for co-leadership in interprofessional healthcare teams.