Management of radiotherapy patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators: A Report of the AAPM TG-203†.

Managing radiotherapy patients with implanted cardiac devices (implantable cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators) has been a great practical and procedural challenge in radiation oncology practice. Since the publication of the AAPM TG-34 in 1994, large bodies of literature and case reports have been published about different kinds of radiation effects on modern technology implantable cardiac devices and patient management before, during, and after radiotherapy. This task group report provides the framework that analyzes the potential failure modes of these devices and lays out the methodology for patient management in a comprehensive and concise way, in every step of the entire radiotherapy process.

Management of cardiac implantable electronic devices during interventional pulmonology procedures.

An increasing number of patients are receiving cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) now. Many of them need pulmonary procedures for various indications including, but not limited to, lung cancer and benign endobronchial lesions. Over the last two decades, interventional pulmonology (IP) has expanded its scope to include various modalities that use heat and electrical energy and in the process, create electromagnetic field in the vicinity. This raises concerns for electromagnetic interference (EMI) causing abnormal behavior in the CIEDs. While guidelines and recommendations on the peri-procedural management of CIEDs do exist, none of them directly address the pulmonary procedures. In this paper, we strive to review the available literature pertaining to the management of CIEDs in the context of EMI caused by the various IP procedures.

How Should ICDs Be Stopped in the Terminal Phase of Cancer?: Five Cases of Patients in a Palliative Care Unit

<p>From January 2015 to January 2017, we encountered five terminal cancer patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in the palliative care unit of our hospital. Due to delirium or dementia, four of these five patients did not have the decision-making capacity to stop their ICD. Although one patient was capable of making his own decisions, his family did not agree with the medical professional considering the patient’s decision. The families of all five patients made decisions on behalf of the patients. The procedure for stopping the ICD was first discussed with the families at 2–21 days prior to the patients’ deaths. The ICDs were stopped between 3 h and 11 days prior to the patients’ deaths, following the consent of the families, which was obtained after 1–5 consultations. Through these experiences, we became aware of the following problems with regard to stopping ICDs: (1) the lack of experience of medical professionals in decision-making, (2) the lack of recognition of medical professionals to the distress caused to patients by ICDs, (3) the psychological burden and time constraint of discussions, and (4) the lack of knowledge of ICDs among patients and their families. These problems need to be addresses as part of advance care planning for cancer patients. </p>