Effects of two immunosuppression regimens on T-lymphocyte subsets in elderly kidney transplant recipients.

Background: Despite the growing number of elderly kidney transplant (Ktx) recipients, few studies have examined the effects of immunosuppression on their lymphocyte profiles. Methods: We evaluated the early conversion from mycophenolate sodium (MPS) to everolimus (EVL) after rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) 2 mg/kg induction in elderly kidney recipients. Three groups of KTx patients were compared: (a) Young (n=20, 36 ± 7 y) receiving standard immunosuppression (Group A1) (prednisone, tacrolimus, and MPS), (b) Elderly (n=35, 65 ± 3 y) receiving standard immunosuppression (Group B1), and (c) Elderly (n=16, 65 ± 3 y) with early (mean 30 d) conversion from MPS to EVL (Group B2). Naive, memory, and regulatory peripheral blood TCD4+ lymphocytes were quantified at 0, 30, and 365 d. Results: Results are reported as [mean(p25-p75)]. Young recipients had higher lymphocyte counts at baseline [2,100(1,630-2,400) vs. 1,310 (1,000-1,600)/mm3, p<0.0001] maintained higher counts within 365 d [1,850(1,590-2,120) vs. 1,130(460-1,325)/mm3, p=0.018 and vs. 1,410(805-1,895)/mm3, p=0.268]. Elderly recipients showed a decrease in lymphocytes within 30 d [1,310(1,000-1,600) vs. 910(700-1,198)/mm3, p=0.0012] with recovery within 365 d. The same pattern was observed in total lymphocytes and TCD4+ counts. Rabbit antithymocyte globulin induced a reduction in central memory T-cell percentages at 30 d in both young recipients [6.2(3.77-10.8) vs. 5.32(2.49-7.28)% of CD4+, p=0.036] and in elderly recipients [8.17(5.28-12.88) vs. 6.74(4.36-11)% of CD4+, p=0.05] on standard immunosuppression, returning to baseline at 365 d in elderly recipients but not in young recipients. Regulatory T CD39+ cells (Treg) percentages decreased at 30 d in elderly recipients [2.1(1.23-3.51) vs. 1.69(0.8-2.66)% of CD4+, p=0.0028] and in young recipients [1.29(0.45-1.85) vs. 0.84(0.18-1.82)% of CD4+, p=0.0038], returning to baseline at 365 d in elderly recipients [2.1(1.23-3.51) vs. 2.042(0.88-2.42)% of CD4+], but not in young recipients [1.29(0.45-1.85) vs. 0.86(0.7-1.34) % of CD4+]. The elderly everolimus conversion group did not show significant changes in cell profile over time or compared to elderly recipients with standard immunosuppression. Conclusion: Aging favored the maintenance of Treg during the late transplantation period despite ongoing immunosuppression. Lymphocyte depletion due to rATG was more prominent in elderly recipients and affected memory subsets with a temporary reduction in central memory T cells. However, conversion to everolimus did not impact Treg profile. Reducing the dose of rATG in elderly recipients seems necessary for the expected lymphocyte changes with EVL to occur. Clinical trial registration: nEverOld Trial, identifier NTC01631058.

Kidney transplantation outcomes: Is it possible to improve when good results are falling down?

Famure et al describe that close to 50% of their patients needed early or very early hospital readmissions after their kidney transplantation. As they taught us the variables related to those outcomes, we describe eight teaching capsules that may go beyond what they describe in their article. First two capsules talk about the ideal donors and recipients we should choose for avoiding the risk of an early readmission. The third and fourth capsules tell us about the reality of cadaveric donors and recipients with comorbidities, and the way transplant physicians should choose them to maximize survival. Fifth capsule shows that any mistake can result in an early readmission, and thus, in poorer outcomes. Sixth capsule talks about economic losses of early readmissions, cost-effectiveness of transplantation, and how to improve outcomes and reduce costs by managing a risky patient-portfolio. Seventh capsule argues about knowing your risk behavior to better manage your portfolio; and Eighth capsule about the importance of the center experience in transplanting complex patients. We finish with some lessons of the importance of the transplantation process and the collaboration with other disciplines in order to prevent the conditions that lead to early readmissions.