How common is extra-articular knee deformity? How to achieve a ''safe zone'' alignment total knee arthroplasty in patients with extra-articular deformity.

The need for total knee arthroplasty is increasing considerably and one of the goals is to achieve post-surgical coronal alignment. Robotic surgical assistance achieves a functional alignment, which is a hip-knee-ankle angle of 0°. However, it is not possible to provide robotic assisted surgery to all our patients so we must include the full-length hip-to-ankle AP weight-bearing radiograph in preoperative planning to obtain a "safe zone" alignment, which is a post-surgical hip-knee-ankle Angle of 0 ± 3°. How can we achieve a "safe zone" alignment total knee arthroplasty in patients with extra-articular deformity?

La necesidad de artroplastia total de rodilla está aumentando considerablemente y uno de los objetivos es lograr la alineación coronal postquirúrgica. La asistencia quirúrgica robótica consigue una alineación funcional, que es un ángulo cadera-rodilla-tobillo de 0°. Sin embargo, no es posible ofrecer cirugía asistida por robot a todos nuestros pacientes, por lo que debemos incluir la radiografía AP de soporte de peso de cadera a tobillo de cuerpo entero en la planificación preoperatoria para obtener una alineación de "zona segura", que es un ángulo postquirúrgico cadera-rodilla-tobillo de 0 ± 3°. ¿Cómo podemos conseguir una artroplastia total de rodilla con alineación de "zona segura" en pacientes con deformidad extraarticular?

How common is extra-articular knee deformity? How to achieve a «safe zone¼ alignment total knee arthroplasty in patients with extra-articular deformity / ¿Qué tan común es la deformidad extraarticular de rodilla? ¿Cómo lograr una artroplastia total de rodilla con alineación de «zona segura¼ en pacientes con deformidad extraarticular?

Abstract: The need for total knee arthroplasty is increasing considerably and one of the goals is to achieve post-surgical coronal alignment. Robotic surgical assistance achieves a functional alignment, which is a hip-knee-ankle angle of 0o. However, it is not possible to provide robotic assisted surgery to all our patients so we must include the full-length hip-to-ankle AP weight-bearing radiograph in preoperative planning to obtain a «safe zone¼ alignment, which is a post-surgical hip-knee-ankle Angle of 0 ± 3o. How can we achieve a «safe zone¼ alignment total knee arthroplasty in patients with extra-articular deformity?

Resumen: La necesidad de artroplastia total de rodilla está aumentando considerablemente y uno de los objetivos es lograr la alineación coronal postquirúrgica. La asistencia quirúrgica robótica consigue una alineación funcional, que es un ángulo cadera-rodilla-tobillo de 0o. Sin embargo, no es posible ofrecer cirugía asistida por robot a todos nuestros pacientes, por lo que debemos incluir la radiografía AP de soporte de peso de cadera a tobillo de cuerpo entero en la planificación preoperatoria para obtener una alineación de «zona segura¼, que es un ángulo postquirúrgico cadera-rodilla-tobillo de 0 ± 3o. ¿Cómo podemos conseguir una artroplastia total de rodilla con alineación de «zona segura¼ en pacientes con deformidad extraarticular?

What Is the Alignment and Balance of a Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Using a Calipered Kinematic Alignment Technique?

METHODS: We simulated calipered kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty (cKATKA) using alignment data and ligament tensions acquired during 607 consecutive robotic-assisted TKAs performed using a dynamic ligament tensor. The distal femur was resected parallel to the native joint line accounting for cartilage loss. The proximal tibial resection necessary to achieve extension gap balance was calculated for each knee. Similarly, symmetric posterior condylar resections prescribed by this method were simulated and the tibial resection needed to achieve a balanced flexion gap calculated. Finally, the resultant limb alignment and degree of joint balance in both flexion and extension of each knee were determined and categorized according to the preoperative knee alignment. RESULTS: Increasing preoperative varus deformity required a greater tibial varus cut to achieve a balanced extension gap (P < .0001). There was no correlation between tibial varus angle and flexion gap balance (P > .1). For mild varus deformities 81% and 95% of knees could be balanced and have an overall limb alignment within 3° and 5° from the mechanical axis respectively. For knees with moderate-severe varus, only 37% and 74% could be balanced within these alignment boundaries (P < .01). Overall, 95% of these simulated knees could be balanced with an overall alignment within 0° ± 5°. However, 50% of the simulated TKAs had looser medial gaps in flexion compared to the lateral gap. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the cKATKA method can yield TKAs within 0° ± 5° of mechanical axis alignment by simply adjusting the proximal tibial resection without ligament releases. However, an undesirable flexion gap balance was predicted in nearly 50% of the TKAs.

In Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty, Failure to Recreate Native Tibial Alignment Is Associated With Early Revision.

BACKGROUND: The goal of kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to restore native knee anatomy. However, there are concerns about patellofemoral tracking problems with this technique that lead to early revision. We measured the differences between preoperative anatomic alignment and postoperative component alignment in a consecutive series of KA TKA and evaluated the association between alignment changes and the likelihood of early revision. METHODS: The charts of 219 patients who underwent 275 KA TKA procedures were reviewed. Preoperative anatomic alignment and postoperative tibial and femoral component alignment were measured radiographically. The difference in component alignment compared with preoperative anatomic alignment was compared between patients who underwent aseptic revision and those who did not at a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic curves were created for statistically significant variables, and the Youden index was used to determine optimal alignment thresholds with regard to likelihood of revision surgery. RESULTS: Change in tibial component alignment compared with native alignment was greater (P = .005) in the revision group (5.0° ± 3.7° of increased varus compared with preoperative anatomic tibial angle) than in the nonrevision group (1.3° ± 4.2° of increased varus). The Youden index indicated that increasing tibial varus by >2.2° or more is associated with increased likelihood of revision. Preoperative anatomic alignment and change in femoral alignment and overall joint alignment (ie, Q angle) were not associated with increased likelihood of revision. CONCLUSION: Small increases in tibial component varus compared with native alignment are associated with early aseptic revision in patients undergoing KA TKA.