Antinuclear antibody (ANA) positivity pattern by line immunoassay in a hospital from eastern India: Update from a laboratory perspective.

Context: The existence of more than one antibody in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) or connective tissue disease (CTD) along with features of more than one autoimmune disease (AD) in an individual is suggestive of overlap syndrome (OS). Line immunoassay (LIA) can target many autoantibodies in a single approach, thus making the identification of OS feasible. Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to identify the pattern of distribution of antinuclear antibodies by LIA prevalent in a hospital population in eastern India and identify common forms of SARD in this belt based on laboratory findings. Material and Methods: A total of 1660 samples received for ANA profile testing by LIA were analysed. Statistical Analysis: Factor analysis was performed with factor loading scores used in the k-means algorithm to identify clustering of various autoantibodies. Results: U1-snRNP positivity was the highest at 16.69%, and the least frequent autoantibody noted was anti-Jo-1 at 0.71% positivity. Based on the outcome of factor analysis, three clusters were determined. Cluster 1 showed a predominance of anti-PM/Scl antibodies, cluster 2 showed a predominance of anti-dsDNA, anti-histone, anti-SmD1, anti-nucleosomes, anti-PCNA, anti-Po, anti-SSA/Ro52, anti-SSA-Ro60, anti-SSB/La, anti-Scl-70, anti-Mi-2, anti-Ku and anti-AMA-M2, and cluster 3 showed a predominance of anti-U1-snRNP. Conclusions: Mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) and overlap syndrome (OS) are prevalent more than pure form of an AD in our study population. OS may be missed out by monospecific immunoassays and hence adds to diagnostic challenges. LIA may be more useful in identifying specific autoantibodies by a single approach rather than monospecific immunoassays in populations after a positive screen by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF).

Association of Systemic Markers of Inflammation with Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease and Sjogren's Syndrome in the Dry Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM©) Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the possible role of systemic inflammation in dry eye disease (DED) via systemic inflammatory marker associations with DED signs and symptoms, and an analysis of a subgroup with Sjogren's Syndrome (SS). METHODS: Participant serums were analyzed using line immunoassays (LIAs) for the presence of antibodies against 34 systemic inflammatory markers. Using the 2012 American College of Rheumatology definition, the 481 participants were categorized into group 1 (SS; n = 52), group 2 (autoimmune disease not including SS; n = 66), or group 3 (control, i.e. no autoimmune disease; n = 363). RESULTS: 3 markers were positive in ≥10% of participants: Ro52 (19.3%), Scl-70 (15.0%), CN-1A (14.2%). 2 markers were positively associated with symptoms: PM-Scl100 (p = 0.02), Sm (p = 0.009). 5 markers were positively associated with signs: U2SnRNP A', Ro52, La, DNA, Ro60. SS participants showed significantly higher positivity for 4 markers compared to participants with no autoimmune disease: PL-7 (p = 0.02), Ro52 (p < 0.0001), La (p < 0.0001), Ro60 (p < 0.0001). SS participants showed significantly higher positivity for 3 markers compared to participants with another autoimmune disease: Ro52 (p < 0.0001), La (p = 0.002), Ro60 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show evidence of significant systemic inflammation in participants with moderate-to-severe DED, based on the markers tested. PM-Scl100 and Sm may be associated with more severe DED symptoms. U2SnRNP A', Ro52, La, DNA, and Ro60 may be associated with more severe ocular surface disease. Ro52 and PL-7 may be diagnostic markers for SS. Future research evaluating these relationships and their clinical significance is needed.

The Role of Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF) and Line Immunoassay (LIA) in the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Diseases and Their Clinical Correlation: An Observational Study From a Tertiary Care Center in Bihar.

Background and aim The presence of distinct sets of autoantigens and autoantibodies bestow these autoimmune diseases (ADs) with specific immune profiles or fingerprints, which has cleared the diagnostic dilemma associated with these ADs. This study was planned to collate and compare the reporting of indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) with line immunoassay (LIA) and their clinical correlations. This study was conducted to investigate the association between the reporting of anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) screening by IIF and ANA profile reporting by LIA. Additionally, it aimed to explore the association of ANA pattern detection by IIF with the detection of autoantibodies against nuclear antigens by LIA and the association of autoantibody detection by LIA with clinical diagnosis. Methodology A total of 98 samples from patients suspected of having ADs were subjected to both IIF and LIA, and results were correlated with clinical diagnosis. Results In the homogenous pattern noted by IIF, the clustered antigens identified by LIA included dsDNA, Nucleosome, Histone, and Mi-2. In the speckled pattern, the identified antigens were SS-A/Ro52, P0, SS-A/Ro60, SS-B/La, and U1-snRNP. On the other hand, the nucleolar pattern revealed antigens AMA M2, PCNA, and CENP-B. The centromere pattern was mostly associated with CENP-B. The speckled pattern was found to be most commonly associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The most common autoantibody found in total ANA profile-positive samples was anti-U1-snRNP followed by anti-SS-A/Ro60 and anti-SS-B/La, and all three were found to be associated with SLE. Conclusions SLE was the most common AD identified in our study samples, with the speckled pattern being the most common pattern on IIF and anti-U1-snRNP being the most common ANA identified by LIA. The fluorescence pattern of IIF predicts the presence of specific antibodies. LIA should be reserved for IIF-positive but dubious cases and whose signs and symptoms are nebulous and do not match the disease dictated by IIF.

Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu-Lato-Specific Antibodies in Sera of Canine and Equine Origin-A Comparative Study with Two Line Immunoassays.

Lyme borreliosis is a vector-borne disease in humans and animals caused by bacteria from the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex (Bbsl). The possible transmission of Bbsl from companion animals to humans via ticks makes this disease important in terms of One Health approaches. Thus, early and accurate diagnosis and treatment are of utmost importance. Today's standard for the detection of specific antibodies against Bbsl is a two-tiered test system based on an ELISA for screening combined with a line immunoassay (LIA) for confirmation. In this study, 200 canine and 200 equine serum samples with known antibody status were tested with two different LIAs (A and B). Results were compared regarding sensitivity, specificity, the diagnostic outcome for dogs and horses, as well as operability of the test. The results for canine serum samples corresponded to 94.0%, making both LIAs a good choice for LB diagnostic in dogs. For equine serum samples, the agreement of both tests was 65.5%, displaying the challenge equine samples still provide in LB diagnostic. Major concerns were the interpretation of the OspA antigen (AG) signal and the use of unspecific (i.e., p100/p83) or too sensitive signals on the LIA. The operability of both LIAs was equally user-friendly. Regarding the tests' evaluation, the scanning process provided by LIA A was a major advantage considering the comparability of the tests.

Differences in Antiphospholipid Antibody Profile between Patients with Obstetric and Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune condition characterised by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) associated with vascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy complications. In a cohort of 74 yet diagnosed APS individuals fulfilling Sydney laboratory criteria (twice positive for lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, aCL, and/or anti-ß2glycoprotein I, aß2GPI), 33 out of 74 were obstetric APS (OAPS) and 41 thrombotic APS (TAPS) patients. 39% of TAPS patients were women. Although aPL detection was persistent, we observed an oscillatory aPL positivity in 56.7% and a transient seroconversion in 32.4% of APS patients at enrolment. Thus, we tested their sera in a line immunoassay that simultaneously detected IgG or IgM for criteria (aCL and aß2GPI) and non-criteria (anti-phosphatidylserine, aPS; anti-phosphatidic acid, aPA; anti-phosphatidylinositol, aPI; anti-annexin 5, aA5; anti-prothrombin, aPT; anti-phosphatidylethanolamine; anti-phosphatidylglycerol, and anti-phosphatidylcholine) aPL. OAPS and TAPS patients displayed different but overlapping clusters based on their aPL reactivities. Specifically, while OAPS patients showed higher aPA, aPS, aA5, aß2GPI and aPT IgM levels than TAPS patients, the latter displayed higher reactivity in aCL, aPI and aA5 IgG. Eventually, with a cut-off of the 99th percentile established from a population of 79 healthy donors, TAPS patients significantly tested more positive for aCL and aA5 IgG than OAPS patients, who tested more positive for aPA, aPS and aß2GPI IgM. Transiently seronegative APS patients showed non-criteria aPL positivity twice in sera obtained 3 months apart. Overall, our data show that APS patients presented clusters of aPL that define different profiles between OAPS and TAPS, and persistent non-criteria aPL positivity was observed in those who are transiently seronegative.

The choice of anti-LEDGF/DFS70 assay matters: a comparative study of six assays.

Lens-epithelial derived growth factor (LEDGF/DFS70) autoantibodies result in the commonly observed dense fine speckled (DFS) pattern by anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) assay. However, there is no consensus approach for confirmation of this autoantibody specificity. To evaluate current approaches, we examined inter-assay agreement between six anti-LEDGF/DFS70 assays. A total of 395 consecutive sera samples from routine ANA diagnostics were obtained, tested by routine ANA, anti-ENA line immunoblot assay (LIA) and anti-dsDNA assay and with six anti-DFS/LEDGF assays: the EuroLine-LIA (Euro-LIA), Medical and Biological Laboratories ELISA (MBL-ELISA), Phadia-EliA (EliA), QUANTA Flash CLIA, EuroImmun ELISA (Euro-ELISA) and Immco-Diagnostics HEp-2 ELITE/DFS-Knockout (HEp-2KO). Of 395 sera, 108 tested positive by at least one assay. Despite general good concordance between all assays across the cohort (Gwet's AC1=0.89), within the target DFS-ANA pattern group inter-assay agreement was poor (AC1=0.59). Euro-LIA, CLIA and MBL-ELISA assays were most concordant, but CLIA and Euro-LIA were also most likely to identify discordant positive results. EliA and Euro-ELISA had poorer agreement, which could be attributable to ill-matched cut-offs between assays. HEp-2KO was frequently discordant with all other assays tested. Euro-LIA, CLIA and MBL-ELISA were most concordant at manufacturer's specifications and are suited for use in clinical laboratories. Modified assay thresholds are required to ensure comparative results for Euro-ELISA and EliA. HEp-2KO assay is frequently discordant with all other assays, making it less suited for routine diagnostics. The study highlights the importance of considering inter-assay variability when developing a diagnostic strategy for anti-LEDGF/DFS70 autoantibodies in clinical laboratories.

Anti-Ro52/TRIM21 serological subsets identify differential clinical and laboratory parameters.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-Ro52/tripartite motif-containing protein 21 (TRIM21) IgG is one of the most common autoantibodies found in systemic autoimmune diseases and is typically found in conjunction with anti-Ro60 and/or anti-La. A retrospective, cross-sectional study was undertaken to examine the clinical and laboratory features of two serological subsets: patients with anti-Ro52/TRIM21 autoantibodies in the absence of anti-Ro60 and anti-La (isolated anti-Ro52/TRIM21) and patients with anti-Ro52/TRIM21 in the presence of anti-Ro60 and/or anti-La. METHODS: Over a 12-month period, patients tested positive for anti-Ro52/TRIM21 via line immunoassay (LIA) at the Westmead Hospital (Australia) immunopathology laboratory were included. The presence of anti-Ro60 and/or anti-La via same LIA was noted. Associated laboratory and medical records were perused to extract demographic, laboratory, and clinical information. RESULTS: There were 346 patients within the study period, and 39.9% of the patients positive for anti-Ro52/TRIM21 lacked anti-Ro60/anti-La autoantibodies. Isolated anti-Ro52/TRIM21 patients tend to be older, have lower anti-Ro52/TRIM21 titres, have lower rheumatoid factors, and have lower proportions of neutropaenia compared to patients who were positive for anti-Ro52/TRIM21 and anti-Ro60/La. This occurred independent to diagnoses of Sjögren's syndrome or systemic lupus erythematosus. Coexisting neurological syndromes, pulmonary pathologies, and malignancies were more prevalent in the isolated anti-Ro52/TRIM21 subset. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with isolated anti-Ro52/TRIM21 tend to have distinct and important clinical and laboratory associations. It is unclear if these patients evolve or remain a stable subset and how they originate immunologically. Longitudinal and prospective studies are required to ascertain the overall predictive and prognostic value of this stratification. Key Points • Anti-Ro52/TRIM21 is an autoantibody found in autoimmunity and non-immunological conditions. • Sixty percent of anti-Ro52/TRIM21 patients are positive for anti-Ro60. • Isolated anti-Ro52/TRIM21 has reduced anti-Ro52/TRIM21 and rheumatoid factor titres. • Isolated anti-Ro52/TRIM21 is associated with anaemia and malignancies.

Analytical and clinical performance of different platforms simultaneously detecting 15 antinuclear antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are invaluable biomarkers for the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases (AIDs). This study aims to compare the performances of line immunoassay (LIA), multiplex bead-based flow fluorescent immunoassay (MBFFI), and magnetic bar code immunofluorescence assay (MBC-IF) to detect ANA-Profile-15S. METHODS: In total, 184 samples from AID patients and 50 healthy controls (HCs) were collected. Fifteen ANAs (anti-dsDNA, nucleosome, histone, Sm, PCNA, ribosomal-P, SS-A/Ro52, SS-A/Ro60, SS-B/La, centromere B [CENP-B], Scl-70, U1-snRNP, AMA-M2, Jo-1, and Pm/Scl) were subjected to parallel detection by the LIA, MBFFI, and MBC-IF. The consistency between assays was analyzed. The discrepant results were further examined by chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA). RESULTS: Anti-SS-A/Ro52 and SS-A/Ro60 autoantibodies were the most common autoantibodies in ANA positive-profiles, and were detected with equal efficiency by the LIA, MBFFI, and MBC-IF (p = 0.101 and p = 0.732, respectively). The three assays showed excellent agreement (consistency range: 66.5%-97.5%), and total consistency was 85.8%. The MBFFI and MBC-IF assays were in good agreement in terms of ANA-Profile-15S determination; the kappa coefficient ranged from 0.59 to 0.95, except for the PCNA and PM-Scl. Of the 262 re-assessed divergent results, 124 (47.33%) were positive on CLIA; the various autoantibodies exhibited variable patterns. More importantly, the ANA-Profile-15S results of the MBFFI and MBC-IF accurately identified patients with AID; the area under the curves ranged from 0.642 to 0.919. CONCLUSIONS: The novel MBFFI and MBC-IF assay performed well in detecting ANA-Profile-15S. The application of MBFFI and MBC-IF play important roles in laboratory diagnosis of AIDs.

Performance of myositis-specific antibodies detected on myositis line immunoassay to diagnose and sub-classify patients with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, a retrospective records-based review.

AIM: To evaluate myositis line immunoassay (LIA) for diagnosis and sub-classification of suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). To investigate if test performance is improved by increasing signal strength cut-off for myositis-specific antibody (MSA) or combining MSA with indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). METHODS: A retrospective, consecutive case series of patients investigated for MSAs from June 2013 to June 2020 for suspected IIM. Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated with 95% confidence intervals for diagnosis of IIM. Association of IIM diagnosis with increased signal strength and presence of an expected IIF pattern on Hep-2 cells was assessed by Fisher's exact test in MSA-positive patients. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients were evaluated. IIM was diagnosed in 32/195 (16.4%) patients. MSAs were detected in 41/195 (21%) patients, 18/41 (43.9%) patients with an MSA had a diagnosis of IIM. The probability of an IIM diagnosis was increased in MSA-positive patients with high compared with low signal strength (83.3% vs 43.5%; P = 0.01) and an expected compared with unexpected IIF pattern (61.5% vs 23.8%; P = 0.04). Specificity for IIM was not significantly improved by increasing signal strength cut-off (85.9% vs 93.8%). Positive predictive value of myositis LIA was only modest and not significantly improved by either increasing signal strength cut-off or requiring an expected IIF pattern for determination of MSA positivity (43.9% vs 60% vs 61.5%). Sub-classification of IIM correlated closely for respective MSAs (88.9%). CONCLUSION: Increased MSA signal strength on myositis LIA and the presence of an expected IIF pattern were associated with IIM diagnosis. Test performance was non-significantly improved by these methods. Prevalence of IIM in this patient cohort was low; it is not excluded that LIA performance could be improved by these methods in a higher prevalence cohort.

Comparison of antinuclear antibody profiles obtained using line immunoassay and fluorescence enzyme immunoassay.

OBJECTIVE: LIA-ANA-Profile-17S is a multiplex line immunoassay that simultaneously detects 17 antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) against extractable nuclear antigens (ENAs). We evaluated the utility of LIA-ANA-Profile-17S as a supplement to ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and EliA ENA (a fluorescence enzyme immunoassay) for diagnosis of ANA-associated rheumatic diseases. METHODS: Sera were collected from 245 patients referred for an ANA IIF test. LIA-ANA-Profile-17S results were compared with those of EliA ENA. The kappa coefficients, agreement rates, and diagnostic performance of these tests were assessed for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and Sjögren's syndrome (SjS). RESULTS: We observed almost perfect interassay agreement for antibodies against Ro52/Ro60, CENP-B, and Scl-70 (kappa = 0.91, 0.97, and 1.00, respectively); strong agreement for anti-SS-B/La antibody (kappa = 0.81); and relatively low agreement for other antibodies, including those against dsDNA, Sm, RNP, and Jo-1. For SLE diagnosis, LIA-ANA-Profile-17S showed lower sensitivity and similar specificity compared with EliA ENA. The sensitivity and specificity of these two assays were similar for SjS diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The specificity of LIA-ANA-Profile-17S was enhanced when combined with ANA IIF and was comparable with that of EliA ENA. LIA-ANA-Profile-17S showed relatively good agreement with EliA ENA. In combination with ANA IIF, these assays showed enhanced diagnostic performance.

Lack of standardisation in interpretation and reporting of autoantibody assays: a survey analysis of Australasian laboratories with focus on line immunoassays.

Autoantibody assays are reported in a variety of formats. Results only slightly above established cut-offs provide lower likelihood ratios; therefore, their clinical significance may be more uncertain, which is not readily communicated with dichotomous qualitative reporting. Line immunoassays (LIA) are a common method for detecting antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) and myositis-associated antibodies. However, recommended positive cut-offs are contentious. We distributed a survey via e-mail to participants in the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program (RCPAQAP) Immunology modules and to a dedicated immunology mailing list in Australasia. Questions explored general viewpoints surrounding autoantibody reporting, as well as current laboratory practices, with particular focus on interpretation and reporting of the most commonly used ENA LIA manufactured by Euroimmun. There were 31 responders, representative of at least 17 unique laboratories across Australia (8 public, 5 private) and New Zealand (4 laboratories). Responses suggest that autoantibody reporting is not standardised; there was variation in general viewpoints and reporting practices, particularly regarding the interpretation of and positive cut-offs used for the Euroimmun ENA LIA, which were contrary to the manufacturer's guidelines in a majority of the responses. Interpretative qualitative reporting based on results from other investigations and the clinical history was a common theme. There is large variation in the reporting of autoantibody assays within Australasia, especially by LIA. A majority of respondents report the most commonly used ENA LIA contrary to manufacturer's guidelines; alternative positive cut-offs are commonly utilised. LIA reports should indicate the level of positivity to enhance their relevance in the clinical decision-making process.

Current Promising Biomarkers and Methods in the Diagnostics of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Review.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a hypercoagulation condition associated with the incidence of heterogenic antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), which non-specifically affect hemostasis processes. APS is clinically manifested by recurrent arterial and venous thromboses and reproduction losses. The aPL antibodies, which may induce clinical manifestations of APS, include criteria antibodies anti-cardiolipin, anti-ß2-glycoprotein-I, and lupus anticoagulant, but also non-criteria antibodies, for example anti-ß2-glycoprotein-I domain I, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin, anti-annexin V, and many others. APS occurs mostly in patients of younger and middle age, most frequently in females. Laboratory diagnostics of APS are quite difficult, as they include a wide spectrum of examining methods, which are based on various principles of detection and are performed using various laboratory techniques. The objective of the review is to describe the current state of potentially examined biomarkers and methods in APS diagnostics. The aforementioned biomarkers are lupus anticoagulant, anti-ß2-glycoprotein-I, anti-cardiolipin, anti-ß2-glycoprotein-I domain I, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin, anti-ß2-glycoprotein-I IgA, anti-cardiolipin IgA, anti-annexin V and II, anti-prothrombin, anti-cardiolipin/vimentin, anti-protein S/protein C, and antibodies against phospholipid antigens for whose diagnostics we may use some of the methods established for a long time and some of the modern methods-the coagulation method for the determination of lupus anticoagulant (LA), enzyme-linked imunosorbent assay (ELISA), chemiluminescence analysis (CLIA), multiplex fluorescence flow immunoassay (MFFIA), fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (EliA), line immunoassay (LIA), multiline dot assay (MLDA), and thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Conclusion: Antibodies against phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, cardiolipin/vimentin complex, and annexin V are currently the most studied new markers. However, these assays have not been standardized until now, both from the laboratory and clinical point of view. In this review we summarize the evidence of the most studied aPL markers and their potential clinical significance in seronegative APS (SN-APS).

A Strategy for Screening and Confirmation of HTLV-1/2 Infections in Low-Endemic Areas.

Serological tests have been widely used for detecting human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1/2 (HTLV-1/2) antibodies in the endemic areas, but their performance in low-risk populations is rarely reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of four HTLV-1/2 screening assays and to discuss a strategy for diagnosis of HTLV-1/2 infection in a non-endemic area. At the present study, 1546 specimens repeatedly reactive (RR) by one screening ELISA were collected from blood centers/banks from January 2016 to April 2019. Avioq-ELISA, Murex-ELISA, Roche-ECLIA and Fujirebio-CLIA were independently performed on each plasma sample and compared to WB and LIA confirmatory tests. Positive or indeterminate specimens with blood available were quantified by qPCR. The results showed that 48 samples were finally confirmed as HTLV-1 positive, 13 were HTLV positive, 151 were indeterminate, and 387 were negative. All the WB-positive samples were also LIA-positive. Roche-ECLIA showed the highest sensitivity that was able to detect 91.8% positives and combined with the Murex-ELISA would significantly increase the positive detection rate (98.4%). In addition, LIA yield more indeterminate and HTLV-untyped results than WB (152 vs. 27), but was able to resolve infection status of some individuals with an indeterminate WB. Besides, 3 WB indeterminate and 1 LIA-untyped samples were confirmed as HTLV-1 positive by qPCR. Based on these findings, we put forward a proper test strategy for HTLV-1/2 diagnosis in low-prevalence areas. If possible, the Roche-ECLIA with the highest sensitivity is suggested as a second screening assay in primary labs. If not, all RR specimens are recommended to be firstly retested by Roche-ECLIA and Murex-ELISA in the reference lab. Secondly, samples reactive to any one of the two tests were quantified by qPCR, and then the NAT-negatives were furtherly submitted to LIA for confirmation. Thereby, the cost can be reduced and the diagnostic accuracy would be improved.

Profiling of non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with SLE: differentiation of thrombotic SLE patients and risk of recurrence of thrombosis.

To reveal the clinical significance of criteria and non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies detected by line immunoassay in comparison with ELISA, systemic lupus erythematosus patients with and without thrombotic events were investigated. Thus, 107 systemic lupus erythematosus patients (48% with deep vein thrombosis or/and arterial thrombosis) and 120 healthy donors were enrolled. Serum antiphospholipid antibodies were detected by ELISA (Orgentec Diagnostika, Germany) and line immunoassay (GA Generic Assays, Germany). Lupus anticoagulant and IgG to cardiolipin and ß2GPI but not IgM as well as triple positivity by ELISA and line immunoassay were linked with thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. IgG to phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylserine by line immunoassay showed significantly higher levels in systemic lupus erythematosus with deep vein thrombosis/arterial thrombosis than without and were independent risk factors for deep vein thrombosis (odds ratio 3.9, 95% confidence interval 1.1, 13.2) and arterial thrombosis (odds ratio 5.1, 95% confidence interval 1.3, 19.8) as well as thrombosis (odds ratio 3.6, 95% confidence interval 1.1, 11.3) and recurrence thereof (odds ratio 6.9, 95% confidence interval 2.1, 22.6), respectively. The occurrence of >4 IgG antiphospholipid antibodies by line immunoassay was an independent risk factor for thrombosis (odds ratio 10.9, 95% confidence interval 1.2, 101.5), arterial thrombosis (odds ratio 14.6, 95% confidence interval 2.5, 86.3), deep vein thrombosis (odds ratio 5.8, 95% confidence interval 1.0, 32.4) and recurrence of thrombosis (odds ratio 35.9, 95% confidence interval 3.8, 342.8). Line immunoassay is a promising multiplex test for the simultaneous detection of criteria and non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies. Profiling of antiphospholipid antibodies by line immunoassay can differentiate systemic lupus erythematosus patients with thrombosis from systemic lupus erythematosus patients without and assess the risk for thrombosis and recurrence thereof.

Niveles de anticuerpos anti nucleares por Fana y Ana-Lia en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas sistémicas / Levels of anti-nuclear antibodies by Fana and Ana-Lia in systemic rheumatic diseases patients

Objetivo: Correlacionar los niveles de anticuerpos antinucleares obtenidos por las técnicas de inmunofluorescencia indirecta (FANA) e inmunoensayo lineal (ANA-LIA) en pacientes diagnosticados o con sospecha clínica de enfermedad autoinmune. Métodos: Se incluyeron 100 pacientes que dieron su consentimiento informado para participar en el estudio. Los ensayos e interpretación de los resultados de las pruebas de FANA y ANA-LIA se realizaron siguiendo las recomendaciones del fabricante. Resultados: el 97,4% de los pacientes estudiados eran de sexo femenino con edad promedio de 42 años, siendo la Artritis reumatoide, Poliartritis y Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico las enfermedades que con mayor frecuencia acompañaron la solicitud médica. Se observó que ambos métodos fueron positivos en el 21% de los casos y que el indice de correlaciòn de Kappa entre las pruebas fue moderado (k= 0,51; p< 0,05), la sensibilidad y especificidad de los métodos fue del 71,4% y 84,8% respectivamente, se observó también que para un determinado patrón fluorescente puede haber positividad de más de un antígeno de la prueba de ANA-LIA y viceversa. Conclusiones: FANA es el método de tamizaje aceptado en la práctica clínica para orientar hacia un diagnóstico clínico de enfermedad autoinmune más probable, debido a la subjetividad en la interpretación de sus resultados y necesidad de entrenamiento en la identificación de los patrones fluorescentes, se requiere del apoyo de otros métodos de laboratorio que permitan identificar con mayor precisión los antígenos reconocidos por los autoanticuerpos, ANA-LIA es una herramienta de laboratorio costo-efectiva de elevada sensibilidad y especificidad que se ajusta a este requerimiento.

Objective: To correlate levels of antinuclear antibodies obtained by indirect immunofluorescence techniques (FANA) and linear immunoassay (ANA-LIA) in patients diagnosed or with clinical suspicion of autoimmune disease. Methods: 100 patients who gave their informed consent to participate in the study were included. Assays and interpretation of results of FANA and ANA-LIA test were performed following the manufacturer's recommendations. Results: 97,4% of the patients studied were female with an average age of 42 years, being rheumatoid arthritis, polyarthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus the diseases that most frequently accompanied the medical request. It was observed that both methods were positive in 21% of the cases and that the Kappa correlation index was moderate between the tests (k = 0,51; p <0,05), the sensitivity and specificity of the methods was 71,4% and 84,8% respectively. It was also observed that for a given fluorescent pattern there may be positivity of more than one antigen of the ANA-LIA test and vice versa. Conclusions: FANA is the screening method accepted in the clinical practice to guide towards a more probable clinical diagnosis of autoimmune disease. Due to the subjectivity in the interpretation of its results and the need for training in the identification of fluorescent patterns, the support of other laboratory methods that allow the identification of antigens recognized by autoantibodies with greater precision is necessary, ANA-LIA is a cost-effective laboratory tool of high sensitivity and specificity that meets this requirement.

Evaluation of the LIA-ANA-Profile-17S for the detection of autoantibodies to nuclear antigens.

OBJECTIVES: The diagnostic tests for autoimmune disease include screening for autoantibodies for nuclear antigens (ANA) and antibodies against extractable nuclear antigens (ENA). Using the line immunoassay (LIA) method, various kinds of ENA antibodies can be detected simultaneously. We evaluated the performance of the newly launched LIA-ANA-Profile-17S (Shenzhen YHLO Biotech, Shenzhen, China) as compared to a conventional LIA kit. METHODS: Residual samples were collected from 200 patients who had been tested for ANA using indirect immunofluorescence. The LIA-ANA-Profile-17S was compared to the EuroLine ANA (Euroimmun, Oberlausitz, Germany) for the analysis of 17 different autoantibodies. The concordance rate and agreement between assays were determined. Samples showing discrepancies between the LIA-ANA-Profile-17S and EuroLine tests were further examined through additional analysis. RESULTS: The overall agreement was moderate (kappa = 0.759, 95% CI = 0.712-0.805). Agreement between assays ranged from weak to almost perfect, except for those tests targeting nucleosomes, histones, and PM-Scl. Of the 57 disparate results between LIA-ANA-Profile-17S and EuroLine, 38 (66.7%) samples tested positive under an additional assay, showing variable patterns between types of autoantibodies. The positive rate of each autoantibody between LIA-ANA-Profile-17S and EuroLine did not differ significantly, except for anti-nucleosome and anti-histone assays in samples from patients diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (P = 0.004 and 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to those from the conventional EuroLine assay, the LIA-ANA-Profile-17S results showed variable agreement in samples showing different prevalence of each autoantibody. The most frequently detected antibodies showed almost perfect agreement. The LIA-ANA-Profile-17S could play a role in the diagnosis of systemic autoimmune disease in ANA-positive samples.

The comparison of different immunoassays for the detection on autoantibodies specific to primary biliary cholangitis / 中华检验医学杂志

Objective To compare the test performance of different immunoassays for the detection on autoantibodies specific to primary biliary cholangitis,including anti-mitochondrial type 2 antibody(AMA-M2),anti-glycoprotein 210(anti-gp210)and anti-nuclear body protein sp100(anti-sp100).Methods Serum samples from Primary Biliary Cholangitis(PBC, n=91), liver disease control(including viral hepatitis,autoimmune hepatitis and liver cirrhosis,n=67)and healthy individual(n=40)were collected from Beijing Youan Hospital during the period between April 2014 and April 2017.All samples were tested with chemiluminescent immunoassay(CLIA)and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA)for AMA-M2, meanwhile the detection on anti-gp210 and anti-sp100 were compared between CLIA and Line Immunoassay(LIA).The Kappa coefficient were used to measure the level of qualitative agreement between different assays.The diagnostic accuracy of AMA-M2 detected with CLIA and ELISA were compared by receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC).Results The overall qualitative agreement between CLIA and ELISA for the detection to AMA-M2 is 88.4%(Kappa =0.765, P<0.01).Excellent qualitative agreement between CLIA and LIA for the detection to anti-gp210 and anti-sp100 was also found with overall agreement as 96.5%(Kappa=0.852,P<0.01)and 98%(Kappa=0.884,P<0.01), respectively.The ROC analysis also showed similar area under the curve(AUC)for CLIA(0.965, P<0.01)and ELISA (0.928,P<0.01)on detection to AMA-M2.Conclusions CLIA and ELISA showed excellent agreement for the detection to AMA-M2.High qualitative agreement between CLIA and LIA was also found when testing anti-gp210 and anti-sp100.

The use of an inkjet injection technique in immunoassays by quantitative on-line electrophoretically mediated microanalysis.

The paper describes a new online quantitative electrophoretically mediated microanalysis (EMMA) for use in immunoassays based on the unique drop-by-drop introduction of a sample by means of an inkjet for capillary electrophoresis (CE). Plugs of a fluorescein-labeled antibody (Anti-humanIgG-DyL550) and human IgG were alternately injected into a capillary using the inkjet, followed by the merging of the plugs and the subsequent immune reaction. The antigen-antibody complex that was formed in the merged zone was then separated by CE. As a proof-of-concept, the method was used to determine human IgG. As a result, both the consumption of the reaction solution and the analysis time were significantly reduced. The method showed a wide linear range (10-2000ngmL-1, R2=0.9912) of calibration and the detection limit (5ngmL-1) was substantially lower than that by for conventional methods.

Anti-DFS70 antibodies detected by immunoblot methods: A reliable tool to confirm the dense fine speckles ANA pattern.

BACKGROUND: Autoantibodies to the DFS70 (dense fine speckles 70) protein have been identified among the antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in patients with various disorders. However, the ANA test in indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) is not a reliable method to identify anti-DFS70 antibodies. We undertook this study to evaluate the diagnostic performance of two new immunoblot methods for the detection of anti-DFS70 antibodies and to investigate whether their different DFS70 antigen composition could affect diagnostic accuracy in detecting anti-DFS70 antibodies. METHODS: 62 samples showing a DFS70 staining pattern by IIF were tested by dot blot (Alphadia) and line blot (Euroimmun) methods. The dot blot method employs a truncated sequence of the DFS70 antigen (residues 349-435), while the line blot uses the full-length protein (aa 1-530). The 62 samples were previously assayed by a chemoluminescent (CLIA) method also using a truncated antigen (aa 349-435): 27 were CLIA positive and 35 were CLIA negative. 120 sera from subjects with infectious diseases were used as controls. RESULT: Both immunoblot methods were positive in the 27 IIF/CLIA positive samples; in addition, the Alphadia dot blot identified another seven DFS70 samples and the Euroimmun line blot was positive in five samples that were negative by CLIA. Among the 120 control samples, two false positives were recorded for the CLIA method, six for the Alphadia method and four for the Euroimmun method. Therefore, in this selected series of samples, sensitivity and specificity were 43.5% and 98.3% for the CLIA method, 54.8% and 95% for the dot blot and 51.6% and 96.6% for the line blot, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Because of great inconsistency in assessing the DFS70 pattern using the ANA-IIF test, specific assays should be used to confirm anti-DFS70 antibodies. The results of this study show that there is no difference in the overall diagnostic accuracy among methods that use the truncated or the full-length DFS70 antigenic sequence and that it is likely that antibodies directed against antigens other than DFS70 may be responsible for producing a DFS70-like ANA-IIF pattern.

Comparison of two extractable nuclear antigen testing algorithms: ALBIA versus ELISA/line immunoassay.

Extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) antibody testing is often requested in patients with suspected connective tissue diseases. Most laboratories in Australia use a two step process involving a high sensitivity screening assay followed by a high specificity confirmation test. Multiplexing technology with Addressable Laser Bead Immunoassay (e.g., FIDIS) offers simultaneous detection of multiple antibody specificities, allowing a single step screening and confirmation. We compared our current diagnostic laboratory testing algorithm [Organtec ELISA screen / Euroimmun line immunoassay (LIA) confirmation] and the FIDIS Connective Profile. A total of 529 samples (443 consecutive+86 known autoantibody positivity) were run through both algorithms, and 479 samples (90.5%) were concordant. The same autoantibody profile was detected in 100 samples (18.9%) and 379 were concordant negative samples (71.6%). The 50 discordant samples (9.5%) were subdivided into 'likely FIDIS or current method correct' or 'unresolved' based on ancillary data. 'Unresolved' samples (n = 25) were subclassified into 'potentially' versus 'potentially not' clinically significant based on the change to clinical interpretation. Only nine samples (1.7%) were deemed to be 'potentially clinically significant'. Overall, we found that the FIDIS Connective Profile ENA kit is non-inferior to the current ELISA screen/LIA characterisation. Reagent and capital costs may be limiting factors in using the FIDIS, but potential benefits include a single step analysis and simultaneous detection of dsDNA antibodies.