Equal short-term outcomes of intracorporeal mechanical gastrogastrostomy in laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for cT1N0 gastric cancer in the middle stomach compared with the extracorporeal hand-sewing method.

BACKGROUND: Intracorporeal mechanical gastrogastrostomy (IMG) techniques have recently been developed and their short-term safety was presented in their initial evaluation. However, whether they are comparable to extracorporeal hand-sewing gastrogastrostomy (EHG) remains unclear. The aim of the study is to establish the safety of IMG in totally laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (TLPPG) compared to EHG in laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (LAPPG). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the short-term outcomes of patients with middle-third early gastric cancer who underwent LAPPG or TLPPG between 2005 and 2022. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the non-inferiority of IMG to EHG in terms of safety, with the primary endpoint being the risk difference in anastomosis-related complications (ARCs). The sample size required to achieve a statistical power of 80% for the non-inferiority test was 971 with a one-sided alpha level of 5% and non-inferiority of 5%. RESULTS: The analysis included a total of 1,021 patients who underwent LAPPG or TLPPG during the study period. Among them, 488 patients underwent EHG, while 533 underwent IMG. The incidences of ARCs were 11.3% and 11.4% in EHG and IMG, respectively. The observed difference in incidence was 0.0017 (90% confidence interval - 0.0313 to 0.0345), which statistically demonstrated the non-inferiority of IMG to EHG in the incidence of ARCs. Among other complications, the incidence of wound infection in IMG was lower than that in EHG. CONCLUSION: IMG is safe regarding ARCs compared with EHG. These results will encourage surgeons to introduce IMG for patients with early middle gastric cancer.

Purse-indigitation mechanical anastomosis vs. traditional mechanical anastomosis undergoing McKeown esophagectomy: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Background: Postoperative anastomosis-related complication rates remain high in patients undergoing McKeown esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis, and the optimal anastomotic technique remains under debate. We describe a new method of anastomosis, referred to as purse-indigitation mechanical anastomosis (PIMA) by reinforcing esophagogastric anastomosis, which can be performed after minimally invasive surgery. This study was designed to compare its feasibility, efficacy, and safety with those of traditional mechanical anastomosis (TMA). Methods: Between September 2020 and January 2022, 264 patients undergoing McKeown esophagectomy at a single center were included. Demographic data, including patient age, sex, diagnosis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy/radiation therapy in cases of malignancy, comorbidities, and operation time, anastomotic time, estimated blood loss, post­operative complications were collected. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed, analyzed and compared between the PIMA and TMA cohorts. Results: The baseline comparability of the PIMA and TMA before the comparisons is no statistical difference. Univariable analysis revealed significantly decreased anastomotic leak rate with PIMA compared to TMA (4.10% vs. 11.59%, P=0.04). No significant difference was demonstrated in total operation time, estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, or pulmonary complications between PIMA and TMA (243.94±21.98 vs. 238.70±28.45 min; 201.10±67.83 vs. 197.39±65.13 mL; 8.83±2.77 vs. 9.35±3.78 days; 8.21% vs. 11.59%; all P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (3.44% vs. 50%) was significantly associated with an increased rate of anastomotic leak [odds ratio (OR): 15.50; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.81-43.71; P<0.01]. Conclusions: PIMA is feasible, safe to perform, and demonstrated a leak rate less than half that of TMA in this study. PIMA may represent a superior alternative to standard esophagogastric cervical anastomosis techniques. Larger sample size and long-term survival are required to fully evaluate PIMA.

A multicentre, prospective cohort study of handsewn versus stapled intracorporeal anastomosis for robotic hemicolectomy.

AIM: Robotic right hemicolectomy is gaining in popularity due to the recognized technical benefits associated with the robotic platform. However, there is a lack of standardization regarding the optimal anastomotic technique in this cohort of patients, namely stapled or handsewn intra- or extra-corporeal anastomosis. The ergonomic benefit associated with the robotic platform lends itself to intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA). The aim of this study was to compare the short-term clinical outcomes of stapled versus handsewn ICA. METHOD: A multicentre prospective cohort study was undertaken across four high-volume robotic centres in France between September 2018 and December 2020. All adult patients undergoing an elective robotic right hemicolectomy with an ICA performed and a minimum postoperative follow-up of 30 days were included. The primary endpoint of our study was anastomotic leak within 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients underwent robotic right hemicolectomy: 92 (63.8%) had a stapled ICA and 52 (36.1%) a handsewn ICA. The operative indication was adenocarcinoma in 90% with a stapled ICA compared with 62% in the handsewn ICA group (p < 0.001). The overall operating time was longer in the handsewn ICA group compared with the stapled ICA group (219 min vs. 193 min; p = 0.001). The anastomotic leak rate was 3.3% in stapled ICA and 3.8% in handsewn ICA (p = 1.00). There was no difference in the rate or severity of postoperative morbidity. CONCLUSION: ICA robotic hemicolectomy is technically safe and is associated with low rates of anastomotic leak overall and equivalent clinical outcomes between the two techniques.

Use of 5-mm Staple in Neonatal Intestinal Surgery.

Introduction: The use of staples to perform intestinal anastomosis in children has gained popularity in the past years. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of pediatric patients who underwent intestinal anastomosis with a 5-mm staple in a tertiary health care center. Material and Methods: From April 2017 to November 2019, the records of all pediatric patients who underwent intestinal anastomosis with a 5-mm staple were retrospectively revised. The reconstruction technique was functional end-to-end anastomosis. Results: A total of 12 intestinal anastomoses were evaluated. Mean age at surgery was 120 days. Small bowel anastomosis was the most frequently performed procedure (eight cases). Stapling difficulties were found in 3 patients. The anastomosis could not be performed with the 5-mm endostapler in one of these patients. The median follow-up was 26 months (interquartile range 20-40 months). Postoperative complications included one bowel obstruction that was surgically treated. Conclusions: Mechanical suturing with 5-mm staple is a safe alternative technique to perform intestinal anastomosis in neonates and infants. The use of this staple has proven to be safe and feasible in pediatric patients. It is necessary to select patients carefully according to their bowel characteristics.

One-shot side-to-side anastomosis (OSSSA) with stapler for cavo-cavostomy in liver transplantation: the first step towards a fully mechanized liver transplant?

BACKGROUND: In literature, a variety of caval reconstruction techniques for liver transplantation have been reported. The piggyback technique preserves the recipient's caval vein which is directly anastomosed to donor's inferior vena cava (IVC) allowing for the reduction of hemodynamic compromise during liver transplantation. METHODS: Herein, we present our standardized step-by-step technique for the realization of a caval one-shot side-to-side anastomosis (OSSSA) using a linear stapler. A Satinsky vascular clamp is placed in a top down direction to realize a longitudinal partial clamping of the recipient IVC. A 1-cm venotomy is then performed on the anterior wall of the recipient IVC to permit the easy introduction of the vascular stapler arm in order to perform the mechanical anastomosis. Portal vein, hepatic artery, and biliary anastomosis are then completed in standard fashion. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the manual one, this mechanical anastomosis permits to reduce operative time, caval and portal vein clamping, warm ischemia time, and visceral congestion. RESULTS: In our opinion, this is a rapid, easy, safe, and reproducible technique to perform the side-to-side cavocaval anastomosis during liver transplantation in selected patients when a manual anastomosis may be technically challenging.

Comparison of a modified one-piece mechanical and double-layer hand-sewn anastomosis in McKeown esophagogastrectomy: A single-institute retrospective study.

The present study aimed to introduce a novel method of cervical esophagogastric anastomosis, so-called 'modified one-piece mechanical anastomosis' (MOMA) in McKeown esophagogastrectomy and to compare its feasibility, efficacy and safety with those of 'conventionally double-layer hand-sewn anastomosis' (CDHA). Between March 2016 and March 2018, 80 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing McKeown esophagogastrectomy with a curative intent were included in the present study. Among them, 40 received MOMA and the other 40 received CDHA. Their medical records, including operation time, anastomotic time, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications within 30 days, as well as survival rate, were retrospectively reviewed, analyzed and compared. Total operation time, anastomotic time and estimated blood loss in the MOMA group were significantly decreased compared with those in the CDHA group (207.73±2.66 vs. 225.40±3.43 min; 10.95±0.44 vs. 23.03±0.47 min; 144.50±21.14 vs. 241.75±23.75 ml; all P<0.01). Anastomotic leakage was present in 1 patient in the CDHA group, but no patients in the MOMA group (P=1.000). Anastomotic stenosis was documented in 4 and 2 patients in the MOMA and CDHA group, respectively (P=0.392). The 30-day operative mortality was 0% and no significant difference was demonstrated in postoperative complications within groups (P>0.05). Furthermore, the disease-free and overall survival was compared by means of Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and log-rank tests and no statistical difference was determined (P=0.5114 and P=0.7875, respectively). McKeown esophagogastrectomy with MOMA may be a feasible, effective and reproducible alternative with relatively satisfactory postoperative outcomes for the treatment of TE-SCC, providing shorter operation and anastomosis times, and less estimated intraoperative blood loss.

Comparison of safety between manual and mechanical anastomosis of esophageal carcinoma after esophagectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis / 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志

@#Objective     To compare the safety of manual anastomosis and mechanical anastomosis after esophagectomy by meta-analysis. Methods    The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about manual anastomosis and mechanical anastomosis after esophagectomy were searched from PubMed, EMbase and The Cochrane Library from inception to January 2018 by computer, without language restrictions. Two authors according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria independently researched literature, extracted data, evaluated bias risk and used R software meta package for meta-analysis. Results     Seventeen RCTs were enrolled, including 2 159 patients (1 230 by manual anastomosis and 1 289 by mechanical anastomosis). The results of meta-analysis showed that: (1) there was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic leakage between mechanical and manual anastomosis (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.67–1.48, P=0.181); (2) no significant difference was found in the 30-day mortality (RR=0.95, 95%CI 0.61–1.49, P=0.631);(3) compared with manual anastomosis, the mechanical anastomosis group may increase the risk of anastomotic stenosis (RR=0.74, 95%CI 0.48-1.14, P<0.001). Conclusion     Esophageal cancer surgery using a linear or circular stapler can increase the incidence of anastomotic stenosis after surgery. There is no significant difference in the anastomotic leakage and 30-day mortality between manual anastomosis, linear stapler and circular stapler.

A novel method of intracorporeal end-to-end gastrogastrostomy in laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer, including a unique anastomotic technique: piercing the stomach with a linear stapler.

BACKGROUND: Delta-shaped anastomosis is usually applied for an intracorporeal gastrogastrostomy in totally laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (TLPPG). However, the remnant stomach is slightly twisted around the anastomosis because it connects in side-to-side fashion. To realize an intracorporeal end-to-end gastrogastrostomy using an endoscopic linear stapler, we invented a novel method including a unique anastomotic technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this new approach, we first made small gastrotomies at the greater and lesser curvatures of the transected antrum and then pierced it using an endoscopic linear stapler. After the pierced antrum and the proximal remnant stomach were mechanically connected, the gastrotomies and stapling lines were transected using an endoscopic linear stapler, creating an intracorporeal end-to-end gastrogastrostomy. We have named this technique the "piercing method" because piercing the stomach is essential to its implementation. Between October 2015 and June 2017, 26 patients who had clinically early gastric cancer at the middle third of the stomach without clinical evidence of lymph node metastasis underwent TLPPG involving the novel method. RESULTS: The 26 patients successfully underwent an intracorporeal mechanical end-to-end gastrogastrostomy by the piercing method. The median operation time of the 26 patients was 272 min (range 209-357 min). With the exception of one gastric stasis, no problems associated with the piercing method were encountered during and after surgery. CONCLUSION: The piercing method can safely create an intracorporeal mechanical end-to-end gastrogastrostomy in TLPPG. Piercing the stomach using an endoscopic linear stapler is a new technique for gastrointestinal anastomosis. This method should be considered if the surgical aim is creation of an intracorporeal end-to-end gastrogastrostomy in TLPPG.

Mechanical suture in rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent digestive malignancies, being the third cause of death by cancer, despite early diagnosis and therapeutic progress made over the past years. Standard treatment in these patients is to preserve the anal sphincter with restoration of intestinal function by mechanical colorectal anastomosis or coloanal anastomosis, and to maintain genitourinary function by preservation of hypogastric nerves. METHODS: In order to emphasize the importance of this surgical technique in the Fourth Surgical Clinic of the CF Clinical Hospital Cluj-Napoca, we conducted a prospective observational interventional study over a 3-year period (2013-2016) in 165 patients hospitalized for rectal and rectosigmoid adenocarcinoma in various disease stages, who underwent Dixon surgery using the two techniques of manual and mechanical end-to-end anastomosis. For mechanical anastomosis, we used Covidien and Panther circular staplers. The patients were assigned to two groups, group A in which Dixon surgery with manual end-to-end anastomosis was performed (116 patients), and group B in which Dixon surgery with mechanical end-to-end anastomosis was carried out (49 patients). RESULTS: Mechanical anastomosis allowed to restore intestinal continuity following low anterior resection in 21 patients with lower rectal adenocarcinoma compared to 2 patients in whom intestinal continuity was restored by manual anastomosis, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.000001). The double-row mechanical suture technique is associated with a reduced duration of surgery (121.67 minutes for Dixon surgery with mechanical anastomosis, compared to 165.931 minutes for Dixon surgery with manual anastomosis, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The use of circular transanal staplers facilitates end-to-end anastomosis by double-row mechanical suture, allowing to perform low anterior resection in situations when the restoration of intestinal continuity by manual anastomosis is technically not possible, with the aim to preserve the anal sphincter, to restore intestinal function and maintain genitourinary function through preservation of hypogastric nerves.

Total mechanical stapled oesophagogastric anastomosis on the neck in oesophageal cancer - prevention of postoperative mediastinal complications.

Oesophagogastric anastomosis after oesophagus resection is commonly performed on the neck. Even though a few different techniques of oesophagogastric anastomosis have been previously detailed, both manual and mechanical procedures have been burdened with leakages and strictures. Our simple technique of oesophagogastric anastomosis is a modification of mechanical anastomosis with the use of a circular stapler in order to prevent postoperative leak and concomitant mediastinal complications. Since 2008, we have performed nine oesophagogastric anastomoses following oesophagus resection. The mean age of the operated patients was 54 years. There was no mortality among the operated patients in the early post-operative period. The mean follow-up period for the patients operated on in our department was 17 months until the time of the analysis. None of the patients showed any leakage or stricture, and no mediastinal complications were reported in the group. Following our own experience, mechanical anastomosis with the use of a circular stapler seems to decrease the time of the operation as well as significantly reducing the incidence of leakages from the anastomosis. This type of anastomosis may decrease the number of postoperative strictures and the most dangerous mediastinal infections.

Microvascular anastomotic coupler assessment in head and neck reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the advantages of using mechanical anastomotic systems in head and neck free tissue transfer. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: A university-based tertiary care center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of mechanical venous coupler devices in head and neck reconstruction performed between October 2004 and December 2006. A total of 261 venous anastomoses were performed in 234 consecutive patients. Five types of flaps were performed: radial forearm (66%), anterior lateral thigh (12%), fibula (9%), rectus abdominis (8%), and latissimus dorsi (2%). Demographic data were collected, and the outcomes measured were flap survival and microvascular complications. RESULTS: The size of the venous anastomosis ranged from 1.5 to 4.0 mm, with most being 3.0 mm (56%) followed by 3.5 mm (23%). The most common recipient vein used was a stump off the internal jugular vein (76%) followed by the external jugular vein (17%). Microvascular complications occurred in <5% (n = 11) of patients, with >50% of those being arterial insufficiency (n = 7). Total failures occurred in 3% (n = 7) of patients: 1.5% (n = 4) acute failures (<5 days) and 1.5% (n = 3) late failures. Of the acute failures, causes included venous congestion (n = 1) and arterial insufficiencies (n = 3). The venous coupler used in the failures was 3.0 mm in diameter. Free flap failures resulting from arterial insufficiency involved coupling to the external jugular vein, while the remaining free flap failures (n = 4) used the internal jugular vein. CONCLUSION: With an early venous failure rate of 0.38%, mechanical anastomosis is an adequate alternative to hand-sewn techniques.

The influence of the operation through tubular stomach plus mechanical anastomosis on the life quality of patients with esophageal cancer / 中国基层医药

Objective To study the influence of the operation through tubular stomach plus mechanical anastomosis on the life quality of patients with esophageal cancer.Methods Seventy patients with esophageal cancer were treated by operation,tubular stomach plus mechanical anastomosis were used.They were followed up for six months.The quality of life was evaluated.Results The average time for the operation was 120 min and the average amount of bleeding was 291.3ml.Compared with before surgery,there was significant difference in emotion,activity,sleep and diet ( P ＜ 0.05 ).Conclusion The operation through tubular stomach plus mechanical anastomosis could significantly improve the quality of life of patients with esophageal cancer.

Application of circular stapler in the reconstruction of intrathoracic esophagus / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective To review the outeonle of intrathoracic esophageal reconstruction using circular stapler after esophageal or cardiac cancer resection.Methods From June 1996 to April 2007,744 patients underwent tumor removal and intrathoracie esophageal reconstruction in Daping Hospital.Of all patients,658 suffered from thoracic esophageal cancer and the other 86 from cardiac cancer.The operative modalities consisted of gastroesophageal anastomosis at the top of tim thoracic cavity or above the aortic arch in 402 patients,gastroesophageal anastomosis below the aortic arch in 317,and total gastrectomy in 25(esophageal replacement with colon in 21 patients and esophagojejunostomy in 4).Results Anastomotie bleeding oecurred in 5 patients intraoperatively.One patient died of acute respiratory distress syndrome,1 of septic shock and 1 of hepatic failure postoperatively.Psychiatric disorder was observed in 5 patients,respiratory complications in 34,anastomotie fistula in 4,and anastomotic stricture in 20.Three weeks after the operation,the esophageal manometric examination in 25 patients showed that intraesophageal,anastomotie and intragastric pressures were(-0.2±2.0),(1 1.2±4.4)and(2.4±1.5)mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa),respectively.Twenty-four hour pH monitoring demonstrated that 13 patients had abnormal DeMeester score(＞14.72),3 of thenl developed reflux symptoms and got relieved after receiving acid suppression therapy for 1.0-2.2 months.The 13 patients with abnormal DeMeester score were followed up for 3-38 months,and the pH value of the esophagus was back to normal in 2 patients,and it almost remained the same in 9 patients.Two patients died of tumor reculTenee of metastasis.Conclusions Intratlmracic esophageal reconstruction with circular stapler is safe,reliable and able to reduce the postoperative complications such as anastomotic fistula.