Mental health in mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder: a cross-sectional study.

The increased prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has placed a significant emotional and psychological burden on mothers. We explored the association between the severity of ASD symptoms in children and the mental health of their mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study included 1,924 mothers of children with ASD, enrolled in a web-based cross-sectional survey over 85 consecutive days to gather clinical and sociodemographic data. The severity of ASD symptoms was obtained according to the children's age. Using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS-21) scale, we found that 35.8 percent of mothers experienced both anxiety and depression. A high education level and a high family income reduced the chance of concurrent anxiety and depression. Conversely, unemployment, a child using psychiatric medication, and higher severity of ASD symptoms increased the chance. Notably, the severity of the ASD symptom was the sole predictor of maternal co-occurring anxiety and depression across all age groups (<3 years aOR = 2.04, 95%CI 1.07-3.89; 3-5 years aOR = 2.76, 95%CI 1.67-4.56; ≥ 6 years aOR = 1.61, 95%CI 1.04-2.50). Recognizing the challenges associated with ASD leads to greater acceptance and tailored interventions, ultimately improving the overall well-being of both individuals with ASD and their mothers.

Stigma toward people with mental disorders in mental healthcare in Chile.

OBJECTIVE: This research aimed to determine the stigma toward people with mental illness among mental health personnel and identify individual, professional, and contextual predictors. METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional, and correlational design was used. The sample consisted of 218 mental health personnel working in Outpatient Psychiatric Units belonging to hospitals and Community Mental Health Centers in Chile. Stigma was evaluated using a scale of humanized treatment, a scale of social distance, and a scale of attitudes in health personnel. In addition, sociodemographic and professional information was collected from mental health personnel and contextual information, particularly the type of outpatient mental health center and the technical-administrative unit that groups all the health centers in a territory. RESULTS: It was found that mental health personnel, in general terms, present low levels of stigma expressed in behaviors of comfort and support toward users, a desire for closeness and social interaction, and reduced stigmatizing beliefs and attitudes of infantilization toward individuals with MHPs. However, intimacy and trust were lower than expected.Only educational levels and health centers were related to stigma. CONCLUSIONS: The low levels of stigma may be due to the evolution of this phenomenon and the country's mental health policies.

Association of mental health with walking capacity in patients with claudication: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to verify the association between mental health (MH) indicators with walking capacity in patients with PAD. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-six patients with PAD and claudication symptoms participated in this study. Physical function was assessed objectively with the 6-min walk test (6MWT) and subjectively using the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ). MH was assessed by the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Bref (WHOQOL-Bref) (six questions were selected - 1, 2, 10, 16, 19, and 26). Patients were divided into tertile groups according to their composite z-score for mental health (Low MH, Middle MH, and High MH). RESULTS: The High MH group presented higher scores (p < 0.05) for the WIQ (distance = 26.8 ± 25.6, speed = 25.4 ± 17.3, and stairs = 33.6 ± 27.5), claudication onset distance (161.6 ± 83.6 m), and total walking distance (352.9 ± 79.6 m) compared to Low MH (WIQ distance = 14.8 ± 16.2, 17.7 ± 13.0, and stairs = 22.7 ± 20.7). Additionally, the High MH group presented a longer claudication onset distance (115.5 ± 70.5 m), and total walking distance in 6MWT (306.6 ± 83.2 m), and higher scores in the total walking distance compared to Middle MH (309.5 ± 93.6 m) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients with PAD, MH was positively associated with walking capacity. Based on these results, treatments that can improve mental health, through different mechanisms, can also positively influence the ability of these patients to walk.

Adherencia al Tratamiento Psicofarmacológico de los Pacientes con Trastornos Mentales Graves y Persistentes: Revisión Sistemática / Adherence to Psychopharmacological Treatment in Patients with Severe and Persistent Mental Disorders: a Systematic Review

resumen Introducción: Se sabe que la falta de adherencia a los medicamentos psiquiátricos tiene consecuencias perjudiciales tanto para los pacientes como para la sociedad. Objetivo: Recopilar información sobre la incidencia de falta de adherencia, los factores y las causas que afectan a la adherencia al tratamiento psicofarmacológico de los pacientes con trastornos mentales graves y persistentes. Métodos: Revisión sistemática de artículos científicos en pacientes adultos (edad > 17 arios), publicados en los últimos 5 años (2015-2020) en bases de datos especializadas como Pub-Med, Scopus, Scielo y BioMed. Se incluyeron artículos de revistas indexadas con factor de impacto > 0,5 en inglés o español, originales, con diseño analítico, prospectivo, retrospectivo, transversal y aleatorizados. Una vez identificados los artículos, se procedió a su análisis, extrayendo la información necesaria para responder las preguntas de investigación. Resultados: Se incluyeron 15 artículos, el 40% (n = 6) publicados en 2020, el 20% (n = 3) realizados en China y el 53,3% (n = 8) de diseño observacional. Se incluyó una población total de 5.837 pacientes, varones el 50,6% (n = 2.955). Reportaron adherencia moderada 10 investigaciones (66,7%). La falta de adherencia varía desde el 7,7 al 60,6%. Los factores que afectan a la adherencia son propios del paciente (edad y sexo) o su red de apoyo familiar, relacionados con la enfermedad o el tratamiento. La principal causa de la falta de adherencia es la ausencia de insight. Conclusiones: La adherencia al tratamiento con psicofármacos es multifactorial. Se debería mejorar el acceso a los servicios de salud mental, poner énfasis en la formación del paciente y aportar mayor conocimiento de la enfermedad mental; la formación y la interacción con el psiquiatra podrían ser intervenciones beneficiosas.

abstract Introduction: It is known that non-adherence to psychiatric medications has harmful consequences for both patients and society. Objective: To collect information on the incidence of non-adherence, and the factors and causes affecting adherence to psychopharmacological treatment in patients with severe and persistent mental disorders. Methods: A systematic review of scientific articles on adult patients (>17 years) published in the last five years (2015-2020) on specialized databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Scielo and BioMed. Original articles from indexed journals with an impact factor>0.5, in English or Spanish, with an analytical, prospective, retrospective, cross-sectional and randomized design were included. Once the articles were identified, they were analyzed, extracting the information necessary to answer the research questions. Results: Fifteen articles were included. Of these, 40% (n = 6) were published in 2020, 20% (n = 3) were produced in China and 53.3% (n = 8) had an observational design. A total of 5,837 patients were included, of which 50.6% were men (n = 2,955), with moderate adherence (n = 10; 66.7%) reported in 10 investigations. Non-adherence varies from 7.7% to 60.6%. The factors that affect adherence are specific to the patient (age and sex), their family support network, and related to the disease or the treatment. The main cause of non-adherence is lack of insight. Conclusions: Adherence to treatment with psychotropic drugs is multifactorial. Access to mental health services should be improved, with an emphasis placed on patient education and providing greater knowledge of mental illness. Interventions to promote education and interaction with the psychiatrist could be beneficial.

Identifying disparities in Mental Illness and Well-Being across Non-Risk, Risk, and Intersectional Groups during COVID-19 and the Sociodemographic's Role in Mental Health Outcomes.

Few pandemic studies explored positive aspects of mental health and employed an intersectional perspective, which considers the concomitant action of different risk conditions. Our intersectional investigation aimed to identify possible mental illness and well-being differences between groups identified as psychologically vulnerable in the pandemic by the WHO (immigrants, minorities, and people with psychiatric diagnoses) and people without pre-existing risk factors while controlling for sociodemographic variables. A cross-sectional survey involved 1,134 participants (76.1% women) aged 18 to 76. We utilized the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS-21) for mental disorder assessment and the Life Satisfaction and Positive and Negative Affects Scales for well-being evaluation. Since a variable-centered approach, multivariate analysis revealed significant differences between the groups in the variables of mental health, depression [F(2.1131)=72.7, p<.001], anxiety [F(2.1131)=78.0, p<.001], stress [F(2.11 1)=85.9, p<.001], and subjective well-being [F(2.1131)=53.6, p<.001]. The groups also differed when we employed a person-centered approach to analyze the variables jointly using Latent Profile Analysis. We identified six mental profiles composed of different levels of depression, anxiety, stress, and well-being. Risk and intersectional groups were more likely to be characterized by Generalized Suffering [ORrisk=0.85, ORintersec=0.93] and Profound Anguish [ORrisk&intersec=0.97] profiles. Control of demographic variables indicated that mental health disparities were partially attributed to participant risk conditions.

Negación psicótica del embarazo. Reporte de caso / Psychotic denial of pregnancy. Case report

La negación psicótica del embarazo es un trastorno poco frecuente y potencialmente peligroso que puede dividirse en dos variantes: psicótica y no psicótica. La negación psicótica del embarazo suele ir acompañada de antecedentes de enfermedad mental. Entre sus efectos negativos se encuentran la angustia psicológica, los partos no asistidos fuera de los hospitales y un aumento potencial de la morbilidad y mortalidad materna y neonatal. Es crucial incluir antecedentes personales y/o familiares de psicopatologías como parte de la anamnesis, ya que esta condición debe ser tratada por un psiquiatra. En cuanto al manejo de este trastorno durante el embarazo o puerperio, no existen recomendaciones específicas. Para proporcionar una atención integral, suele ser necesario un enfoque multidisciplinario. Se presenta un caso de negación psicótica del embarazo(AU)

Denial of pregnancy is a rare, potentially dangerous disorder that can be divided into two variants: psychotic and nonpsychotic. Psychotic denial of pregnancy is typically accompanied by a history of mental illness. Negative effects include psychological distress, unsupported births outside of hospital, and a potential rise in mother and newborn morbi-mortality. It is crucial to include a personal and/or family history of psychopathology as part of the anamnesis because this condition should be treated by a psychiatrist. Regarding the management of this disorder during pregnancy or puerperium, there are no specific recommendations. To provide comprehensive care, a multidisciplinary approach is typically required. A case of psychotic denial of pregnancy is presented(AU)

Reducing Stigma Toward People with Serious Mental Illness Through a Virtual Reality Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Stigma toward people with serious mental illnesses (SMI), like schizophrenia, is a serious global public health challenge that limits the quality of life of those affected and poses a major barrier that keeps people from seeking professional help. There is an urgent need for novel, effective, and scalable interventions to decrease stigmatized perceptions of chronic psychotic disorders and to reduce the health burden imposed by them. Method: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of a new immersive virtual reality game (Inclúyete-VR) on the level of stigma toward people with SMI, measured by the Attribution questionnaire (AQ-27). Participants in the experimental group were exposed in an immersive way to hallucinations common in schizophrenia, then shown different psychosocial resources available for their recovery and social inclusion; those in the control group used VR software unrelated to mental health. VR sessions were delivered through Oculus headgear and lasted 25 minutes. Results: We randomly assigned 124 university students (55% female) to experimental or control conditions (n = 62 each). We used mixed ANOVA to compare outcomes before and after the intervention between the two groups. We found a significant intervention-by-time interaction (P < 0.001), with a reduction in the experimental group of overall stigma levels on the AQ-27 scale and its three subscales: dangerousness-fear, avoidance, and lack of solidarity (P < 0.001 for all). Conclusions: The Inclúyete-VR software proved effective in the short term in reducing stigma toward people with severe mental illness. The program's longer-term efficacy, scalability, and dissemination remain to be studied. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05393596.

Developing and Testing an Evaluation Framework for Collaborative Mental Health Services in Primary Care Systems in Latin America.

To develop and pilot-test a feasible and meaningful evaluation framework to support the ongoing improvement and performance measurement of services and systems in Latin America regarding Collaborative Mental health Care (CMHC). This mixed methods study, guided by a developmental evaluation approach, included: (1) a critical review of the literature; (2) an environmental scan at three selected health networks in Mexico, Nicaragua and Chile; (3) a Delphi group with experts; (4) a final consultation in the three sites; and (5) a pilot-test of the framework. A comprehensive evaluation framework was developed and successfully piloted. It considers five levels, 28 dimensions and 40 domains, as well as examples of indicators and an implementation plan. This evaluation framework represents an important effort to foster accountability and quality regarding CMHC in Latin America. Recommendations to build upon current capacity and to effectively address the existing implementation challenges are further discussed.

Reseña de Ludwig Binswanger y el análisis existencial. Un enfoque filosófico de la enfermedad mental. Foucault, M. (2022). Siglo XXI Ediciones. Trad. Horacio Pons. ISSN: 978-987-801-145-5

Ludwig Binswanger y el análisis existencial. Un enfoque filosófico de la enfermedad mental es una obra escrita por el joven Foucault a principio de 1950, en donde la interrogante filosófica sobre el hombre se presenta relacionada a la enfermedad mental. Esta inquietud filosófica presenta puntos de contactos con Enfermedad mental y personalidad publicada en 1954, aunque se diferencia en cuanto al énfasis clínico desarrollado por Foucault a través de los casos de Binswanger. La lectura foucaultiana sobre el análisis existencial del psiquiatra suizo, nos permite identificar las diferencias de este con el psicoanálisis y la psiquiatría tradicional, así como la importancia de los conceptos de espacio y tiempo en la enfermedad mental.

Ludwig Binswanger y el análisis existencial. Un enfoque filosófico de la enfermedad mental is a work written by the young Foucault in the early 1950s, where the philosophical question about man is presented related to mental illness. This philosophical concern presents points of contact with Endfermedad mental y personalidad published in 1954, although it differs in terms of the clinical emphasis developed by Foucault through Binswanger's cases. Foucault's reading of the Swiss psychiatrist's existential analysis allows us to identify its differences with psychoanalysis and traditional psychiatry, as well as the importance of the concepts of space and time in mental illness.

Ludwig Binswanger y el análisis existencial. Un enfoque filosófico de la enfermedad mental é uma obra escrita pelo jovem Foucault no início da década de 1950, onde é apresentada a questão filosófica sobre o homem relacionada à doença mental. Esta preocupação filosófica apresenta pontos de contato com Enfermedad mental y personalidad publicada em 1954, embora se diferencie quanto à ênfase clínica desenvolvida por Foucault através dos casos de Binswanger. A leitura que Foucault faz da análise existencial do psiquiatra suíço permite identificar suas diferenças com a psicanálise e a psiquiatria tradicional, bem como a importância dos conceitos de espaço e tempo na doença mental.

Comprehensive rehabilitation and job reintegration of people with severe mental illness in a Latin American country: REINTEGRA study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing use of comprehensive rehabilitation models for people with severe mental illness (SMI), there are still limitations to their implementation and replicability in a consensual way, particularly in Latin American countries. The REINTEGRA program aims to be a standardized model of comprehensive rehabilitation focused on psychosocial and cognitive improvement through a set of interventions on different areas of people's functionality, with the goal of reintegrating people with SMI into the labour market. In this paper we summarize the protocol for its subsequent implementation in a mental health institution in Mexico. METHOD: The protocol is based on a quasi-experimental, prospective longitudinal study, with a pragmatic or naturalistic control group. It will be carried out in three phases. Phase 1 consists of a series of interventions focused on psychosocial improvement; Phase 2 focuses on cognitive and behavioral improvement treatments; and Phase 3 targets psychosocial recovery through rehabilitation and reintegration into the labour market. The overall procedure will be monitored with standarized evaluations at different stages of the program. DISCUSSION: This study presents a model of integral rehabilitation of people with SMI. At the moment, one of the obstacles to overcome is the organization and procedural control of the different actors needed for its implementation (nurses, psychologists, doctors, companies, institutions, etc.). REINTEGRA will be the first comprehensive rehabilitation model that includes systematized procedures for job reinsertion for people with SMI in Mexico, which aims to be a standardized tool of easy adaptation and the replicability for other mental health centers and institutions.

Prevention of mental illness within public health: An analysis of progress via systematic literature review and a pathway forward.

Primary prevention is the cornerstone of public health. Prevention is especially important for chronic diseases of significant burden such as mental illnesses because many of them have limited treatment options, an onset in childhood or in adolescence, and are linked to adverse childhood experiences requiring a focus on early childhood and maternal-child health (MCH). Despite this need, there appears to be a paucity of research into prevention of mental illnesses within public health. To confirm this, we performed a systematic literature review to quantify the proportion of articles in public health that focus on prevention of mental illness versus intervention for these illnesses after their onset, and the proportion of published articles within MCH that focus on mental health. Between November 2019 and August 2021, we reviewed 211,794 published articles from 147 Scimago-ranked English public health journals with no limit on year of publication. As hypothesized, a very small portion (2.2%) of mental health articles included primary prevention and a small portion of MCH articles (7.8%) included mental health. These results are consistent with the existence of a research gap in mental illness prevention within the public health field. Given the early onset of mental illness, the importance of early childhood experiences in the later development of mental illness, and the importance of the social-emotional connection between mother and child for building resilience, public health professionals must incorporate evidence from the field of MCH to develop and assess more primary prevention programs for mental illness.

The RAS-24: Development and validation of an adherence-to-medication scale for severe mental illness patients.

Introduction: Several studies have found that most patients with severe mental illness (SMI) and comorbid (physical) conditions are partially or wholly nonadherent to their medication regimens. Nonadherence to treatment is a serious concern, affecting the successful management of patients with SMIs. Psychiatric disorders tend to worsen and persist in nonadherent patients, worsening their overall health. The study described herein aimed to develop and validate a scale (the Ralat Adherence Scale) to measure nonadherence behaviors in a culturally sensitive way. Materials and Methods: Guided by a previous study that explored the primary reasons for nonadherence in Puerto Rican patients, we developed a pool of 147 items linked to the concept of adherence. Nine experts reviewed the meaning, content, clarity, and relevance of the individual items, and a content validity ratio was calculated for each one. Forty items remained in the scale's first version. This version was administered to 160 patients (21-60 years old). All the participants had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, or schizoaffective disorder. The STROBE checklist was used as the reporting guideline. Results: The scale had very good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.812). After a factor analysis, the scale was reduced to 24 items; the new scale had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.900. Conclusions: This adherence scale is a self-administered instrument with very good psychometric properties; it has yielded important information about nonadherence behaviors. The scale can help health professionals and researchers to assess patient adherence or nonadherence to a medication regimen.

Mental illness attitudes in medical education: Assessing the stigma in medical students / Actitudes hacia los trastornos mentales en la educación médica: evaluando el estigma en estudiantes médicos

Abstract Introduction Factors affecting the quality of physician care include a shortage of trained staff, stigma, and discrimination. Objective The objective was to compare the intensity of stigmatization before and after a Psychiatry course, as measured by the scale of clinicians' attitudes towards mental illness, a version for medical students (MICA-2) designed to identify stigmatic attitudes towards mental disorders. Method The fifth-year Medicine students enrolled in the Psychiatry course answered anonymously using the MICA-2 test at the start and the end of their course. Additionally, we asked the students to answer a question about their interest in learning more about mental illness. Results Three hundred and thirty students were invited; 300 agreed to participate in the first application of the scales, and 291 in the follow-up. The average age was 22 ± 2 years, with a range of 20-30 years, and there was a similar gender distribution in both applications. In the initial application, the average score of the MICA-2 was 41.34 (SD = 7.86, 95% CI = [40.43, 42.25]). The follow-up application's mean was 37.10 (SD = 8.15, 95% CI = [36.30, 38.15]). Also, there was a decrease in interest in learning more about mental illness. Discussion and conclusion A reduction in the average scores of the MICA-2 was observed after a Psychiatry course, suggesting that attitudes toward mental disorders improved. A Psychiatry clerkship with close supervision modified the attitudes of medical students toward mental disorders. However, it did not increase their interest in learning more about mental illness.

Resumen Introducción Los factores que afectan la calidad de la atención médica incluyen: la escasez de personal capacitado, el estigma y la discriminación. Objetivo El objetivo fue comparar la intensidad de la estigmatización antes y después del curso de Psiquiatría, se utilizó la escala de las actitudes de los clínicos hacia la enfermedad mental, versión para estudiantes médicos (MICA-2), diseñada para identificar actitudes estigmatizantes hacia los trastornos mentales. Método Los estudiantes médicos de quinto año que tomaban el curso de Psiquiatría respondieron de forma anónima la escala MICA-2 al inicio y al final del curso. Además, se les preguntó sobre su interés en aprender más sobre los trastornos mentales. Resultados Se invitaron a 330 estudiantes; 300 aceptaron participar en la primera aplicación de las escalas y 291 en el seguimiento. La edad promedio fue de 22 ± 2 años, con un rango de 20-30 años; con una distribución de género similar en ambas aplicaciones. En la aplicación inicial, la puntuación media del MICA-2 fue de 41.34 (DE = 7.86, IC 95% = [40.43, 42.25]). En la de seguimiento, la media fue de 37.10 (DE = 8.15, IC 95% = [36.30, 38.15]). El interés en aprender más sobre los trastornos mentales disminuyó. Discusión y conclusión Observamos una reducción en los puntajes promedio después de tomar el curso de Psiquiatría, lo que sugiere que las actitudes hacia los trastornos mentales mejoraron. Un curso de Psiquiatría con mayor disposición y supervisión estrecha modificó las actitudes hacia los trastornos mentales de los estudiantes médicos, pero su interés en aprender más sobre los trastornos mentales disminuyó.

Mental health and associated risk factors of Puerto Rico Post-Hurricane María.

BACKGROUND: Mental health disorders have an increased prevalence in communities that experienced devastating natural disasters. Maria, a category 5 hurricane, struck Puerto Rico on September 20, 2017, weakening the island's power grid, destroying buildings and homes, and limiting access to water, food, and health care services. This study characterized sociodemographic and behavioral variables and their association with mental health outcomes in the aftermath of Hurricane Maria. METHODS: A sample of 998 Puerto Ricans affected by Hurricane Maria was surveyed between December 2017 and September 2018. Participants completed a 5-tool questionnaire: Post-Hurricane Distress Scale, Kessler K6, Patient Health Questionnaire 9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) 7, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder checklist for DSM-V. The associations of sociodemographic variables and risk factors with mental health disorder risk outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Most respondents reported experiencing hurricane-related stressors. Urban respondents reported a higher incidence of exposure to stressors when compared to rural respondents. Low income (OR = 3.66; 95% CI = 1.34-11.400; p < 0.05) and level of education (OR = 4.38; 95% CI = 1.20-15.800; p < 0.05) were associated with increased risk for severe mental illness (SMI), while being employed was correlated with lower risk for GAD (OR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.275-0.811; p < 0.01) and lower risk for SIM (OR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.483-0.952; p < 0.05). Abuse of prescribed narcotics was associated with an increased risk for depression (OR = 2.94; 95% CI = 1.101-7.721; p < 0.05), while illicit drug use was associated with increased risk for GAD (OR = 6.56; 95% CI = 1.414-39.54; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Findings underline the necessity for implementing a post-natural disaster response plan to address mental health with community-based social interventions.

Impacts of mental health in the sleep pattern of healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: After >2 years of the Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, it is well established how sleep symptoms are rising, especially among healthcare workers (HCW). The aim of this study is to evaluate what features are associated with sleep disturbances in the HCW population. METHODS: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of social and clinical variables associated with sleep problems and insomnia incidence in HCW in a large, national-level cohort. The measurement of sleep problems was assessed by self-report using Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS). A multivariate analysis was used in the cross-sectional design and generalized linear models were used in the longitudinal design. RESULTS: 10,467 HCW were analyzed in the cross-sectional analysis, 3313 participants were analyzed in the three timepoints of the study. Sex, previously diagnosed mental illness and frontline work with COVID-19 were associated with higher scores in JSS in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, only previous diagnosis of mental illness was related with sleep difficulties, especially previously diagnosed insomnia. The longitudinal analysis concluded that previous diagnosis of mental illnesses was associated with higher levels of insomnia development (OR = 11.62). The self-reported disorders found to be major risk factors were addiction (OR = 7.69), generalized anxiety disorder (OR = 3.67), social anxiety (OR = 2.21) and bipolar disorder (OR = 2.21). LIMITATIONS: Attrition bias. CONCLUSIONS: Previous diagnosis of mental illness was strongly related to insomnia development in HCW during the COVID-19 pandemic. Strategies that focus on this population are advised.

Cross-cultural adaptation of four instruments to measure stigma towards people with mental illness and substance use problems among primary care professionals in Chile.

Stigma toward people with mental illness and substance use problems is a significant global concern, and prevents people with these conditions from accessing treatment, particularly in primary health care (PHC) settings. Stigma is a cultural phenomenon that is influenced by particular contexts and can differ by country and region. The majority of stigma research focuses on Europe or North America leading to a lack of culturally relevant stigma research instruments for the Latin American context. The present study describes and discusses the methodology for cross-culturally adapting four stigma measurement scales to the Chilean context. The cross-cultural adaptation process included nine phases: (1) preparation; (2) independent translations; (3) synthesis 1 with expert committee; (4) focus groups and interviews with researchers, PHC professionals, and PHC users; (5) synthesis 2 with expert committee; (6) independent back translations; (7) synthesis 3 with expert committee; (8) pilot with PHC professionals; and (9) final revisions. The adaptation process included an array of diverse voices from the PHC context, and met three adaptation objectives defined prior to beginning the process (Understandability, Relevance, and Acceptability and Answer Options). The resulting, culturally adapted questionnaire is being validated and implemented within PHC settings across Chile to provide in-depth insight into stigma among PHC professionals in the country. The authors hope it will be useful for future research on mental illness and substance use stigma in similar settings across Latin America.

Cultural Influences on Mental Health Provision in the Caribbean: How Do Contemporary Perceptions and Beliefs About Persons With Mental Illness Inform Workforce Transformation?

INTRODUCTION: Mental illness is a global phenomenon in society, including trained health professionals, often responding to people with mental illness based on perceptions and beliefs. The research examined "contemporary perceptions and beliefs about mental illness held by stakeholders" attending a mental health symposium in Trinidad. METHODS: Data were collected using a 43-item questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS Version 22. Overall, 84 attendees working directly or experienced in mental health completed the survey. RESULTS: Respondents believed mental illness should be treated within local community settings. Participants who were more comfortable sharing their mental health diagnosis with friends were more likely to share with others, including their employers. There was a relationship between perception of the superstitious causes of mental illness and its effects on healing. DISCUSSION: Qualifications and experience in mental health do not reduce stigma associated with mental illness which has implications for addressing mental health literacy among health professionals.

Cuidado de enfermería del paciente con trastorno mental en atención domiciliaria: revisión narrativa / Nursing care of the patient with mental disorder in home care: narrative review

INTRODUCCIÓN: El manejo integral del paciente con trastorno mental desde enfermería, incluye abordajes que son llevados a cabo en la atención domiciliaria permitiendo así desarrollar actividades de valoración, seguimiento y atención al paciente y su familia. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda estratégica en Medline, Epistemonikos, Base JBI, Biblioteca Virtual en Salud, utilizando los términos "mental disease", "mental illness", "homecare", "nursing". La extracción y análisis de los datos se dio acorde a los planteamientos del JBI, RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 25 artículos que cumplían con los criterios de inclusión y se clasificaron en 4 temas: 1. La experiencia del cuidado en el domicilio del paciente con trastorno mental. 2. Adherencia a la medicación de pacientes con trastorno mental que reciben tratamiento en casa. 3. El adulto mayor con trastorno mental y 4. Estrategias tecnológicas para dar atención domiciliaria al paciente con trastorno mental. CONCLUSIONES: Para abordar integralmente el cuidado del paciente con trastorno mental en el domicilio se deben incluir intervenciones de cuidado soportadas en la evidencia que incluyan la instrucción al cuidador familiar, por lo que es central el rol de enfermería teniendo en cuenta la creciente demanda de intervenciones domiciliarias en psiquiatría basadas en la evidencia, teniendo en cuenta el impacto de la trastorno mental, así como con los desafíos sociales y económicos que conlleva el padecer una trastorno mental para el paciente y su familia.

INTRODUCTION: The comprehensive management of the patient with mental disorder from nursing, includes approaches that are carried out in home care, thus allowing the development of assessment, monitoring and care activities for the patient and his family. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A strategic search was carried out in Medline, Epistemonikos, JBI Database, Virtual Health Library, using the terms "mental disease", "mental illness", "homecare", "nursing". The extraction and analysis of the data occurred according to the approaches of the JBI. RESULTS: 25 articles were identified that met the inclusion criteria and were classified into 4 themes: 1. The experience of care at home for patients with mental disorder. 2. Medication adherence of patients with mental disorder receiving treatment at home. 3. The elderly with mental disorder and 4. Technological strategies to provide home care to patients with mental disorder. CONCLUSIONS: In order to comprehensively address the care of patients with mental disorder at home, care interventions supported by evidence should be included, including instruction for the family caregiver, so the role of nursing is central, taking into account the growing demand for interventions evidence-based psychiatry home care, taking into account the impact of mental disease, as well as the social and economic challenges that mental disease entails for the patient and their family.

Transtornos mentais comuns durante a Pandemia da Covid-19: frequência e fatores associados / Common mental disorders during the COVID-19 Pandemic: frequency and associated factors / Trastornos mentales comunes durante la Pandemia de Covid-19: frecuencia y factores asociados

Este estudo teve por objetivo avaliar a frequência de sintomas de transtornos mentais comuns e os fatores associados a eles na população brasileira no início da pandemia da coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Uma amostra de 1.482 adultos, com idade média de 34,68 anos (DP = 13,66), 76,8% do sexo feminino, respondeu a um questionário sociodemográfico, à Escala de Depressão, Ansiedade e Estresse ­ 21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 [DASS-21]) e à Escala de Atenção e Consciência Plena. Foram observados níveis elevados e atípicos de transtornos comuns, bem como automutilação, ideação suicida e tentativas de suicídio. O traço mindful foi o principal fator associado negativamente tanto a sintomas de ansiedade quantos a sintomas de depressão. Pior condição financeira e orientação sexual não normativa predisseram sintomas de ansiedade e depressão, mas não foram encontradas diferenças entre o grupo que seguiu e o que não seguiu as regras do distanciamento social. O efeito pandêmico pode ser inferido a partir dos níveis clínicos elevados, mas estudos longitudinais podem ajudar a compreender efeitos de longo prazo.

Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar la frecuencia y factores asociados a los síntomas de trastornos mentales comunes en la población brasileña al comienzo de la pandemia de coronavirus disease 2019 (CO-VID-19). Una muestra de 1.482 adultos, con edad media de 34,68 años (DE = 13,66), 76,8% mujeres, res-pondieron un cuestionario sociodemográfico, la Escala Depresión, Ansiedad y Estrés ­ 21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 [DASS-21]) y la Escala de Atención y Conciencia Plena. Se observaron niveles altos atípicos de trastornos comunes, así como automutilación, ideación suicida e intentos de suicidio. La atención plena fue el principal factor asociado negativamente tanto a los síntomas de ansiedad como a los síntomas de depresión. La peor situación económica y orientación sexual no normativa predijeron sínto-mas de ansiedad y depresión, pero no se encontraron diferencias entre el grupo que siguió y el que no si-guió las reglas del distanciamiento social. A partir de los altos índices clínicos, se puede inferir el efecto pandémico, pero estudios longitudinales podrían ayudar a comprender los efectos a largo plazo

This study aimed to assess the frequency and associated factors of symptoms of common mental disor-ders in the Brazilian population at the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A sample of 1,482 adults, with a mean age of 34.68 years (SD = 13.66 years), 76.8% female, answered a so-ciodemographic questionnaire, the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21), and the Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale. Atypical high levels of symptoms of common disorders were observed, as well as self-mutilation, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts. The mindful trait was the main factor negatively associated with both anxiety and depression symptoms. Worse financial conditions and non-normative sexual orientation predicted symptoms of anxiety and depression, but no differences were found between the group that followed and the one that did not follow the social distancing measures. From the high clinical indices, the pandemic effect can be inferred, but longitudinal studies could help understand long-term effects.